Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #475690 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-27 01:51 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-11-14 11:39 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 176 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-27 01:51 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-27 04:27 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-10-27 08:04 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 12:31 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-27 14:22 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 18:47 +0100
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-27 23:14 +0200
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-27 14:24 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-10-28 16:34 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 05:46 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-29 00:00 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 18:59 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-31 00:12 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 17:02 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-31 23:56 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 19:08 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-02 01:32 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-11-01 09:02 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 16:19 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-11-01 12:08 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 20:03 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-11-01 15:36 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 00:52 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-10-29 04:14 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-10-29 04:22 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-10-29 04:27 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-10-29 05:53 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-10-29 05:54 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-10-29 05:56 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-29 08:29 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-10-29 10:35 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 11:19 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-27 11:23 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 14:41 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 19:21 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 20:27 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 23:49 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-28 09:11 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-28 09:13 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-28 13:59 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-28 15:11 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-28 16:30 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-10-28 20:32 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-29 00:45 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-28 23:28 +0100
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 06:29 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-29 21:05 +0100
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-29 13:15 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-30 07:22 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-30 17:40 +0100
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-10-30 11:15 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-31 16:38 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-28 23:54 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-29 07:58 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 12:31 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-30 07:41 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 13:44 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-31 16:09 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 16:18 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-11-01 08:55 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 14:23 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-01 14:35 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-11-01 15:28 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-11-01 15:34 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 15:45 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-11-02 06:59 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 15:42 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 16:49 -0400
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 22:38 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-03 00:47 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 13:50 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-11-03 07:32 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 14:43 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-03 10:10 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-03 15:51 +0100
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-03 10:00 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-11-03 07:21 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-03 15:41 +0100
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 14:48 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-03 15:57 +0100
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 18:03 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 16:56 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-04 00:38 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Buck Dehner <uktoa@yswdoez.cb> - 2018-11-04 12:14 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 18:39 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 14:15 -0500
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 22:14 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 18:35 -0500
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 00:01 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 14:55 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Gaston Castaneda <ucpp@java4ow.nv> - 2018-11-12 19:07 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-04 23:22 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 12:59 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-06 00:29 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 11:54 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-06 04:02 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 13:36 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-06 05:49 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 18:24 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-06 23:30 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 14:52 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-08 05:58 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 15:49 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-08 08:16 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 18:44 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-08 10:55 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 20:47 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-08 13:06 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 01:12 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-09 00:10 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 12:28 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-09 06:24 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 19:24 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-09 11:42 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 12:52 -0500
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 20:47 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 18:44 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-08 10:59 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 13:42 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-10 05:51 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 13:59 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 19:40 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 16:30 -0400
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 20:55 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 20:03 -0400
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 00:18 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 20:22 -0400
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 20:08 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-11-06 14:39 -0600
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Ntowicz Usarczyk <iswso@wioioksi.io> - 2018-11-06 20:59 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 21:05 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-11-06 20:54 -0600
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 13:02 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 21:20 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 13:50 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 17:28 -0500
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 09:07 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 20:24 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 11:17 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-08 21:22 +0100
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-11-08 10:18 -0600
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 18:38 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 17:22 -0500
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-11-06 17:12 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Ntowicz Usarczyk <iswso@wioioksi.io> - 2018-11-07 19:30 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 15:37 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Gaston Castaneda <agn@j2awdos.nc> - 2018-11-08 00:53 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 19:30 -0800
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-04 11:51 +0100
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 13:52 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-11-03 07:14 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-03 15:37 +0100
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 16:55 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 15:45 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideologyua Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 14:36 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideologyua kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-11-01 09:06 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideologyua Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 16:19 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideologyua mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-01 09:51 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-28 02:49 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-10-28 12:53 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-28 15:53 +0100
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-10-28 16:23 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-28 20:05 +0100
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-28 23:53 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-29 07:37 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-29 07:48 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 17:32 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Ulka Górski <dug@jewandass.cu> - 2018-10-29 17:44 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-29 12:06 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 22:21 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 22:45 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-30 07:47 -0700
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 18:22 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-30 17:24 +0100
Re: Einstein's Relativity as an Insane Ideology Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 11:39 +0000
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 18:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prknua$185n$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476142 |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > Odd Bodkin wrote: >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >>> kenseto wrote: >>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such terms >>>> as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time dilation, >>>> entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? >> >> Because, Ken, ALL specialized fields have jargon. >> Physics also has momentum, potential energy, particle, acceleration, >> reference frame, entropy, and a slew of other basic terms, and you don’t >> know the meaning of ANY of them. > > Please avoid posting a follow-up to my postings if all you do is following > up to someone else’s. Ack > > Also, if you had read more carefully, you would have realized that while > your answer is correct if standalone, it is wrong because it does not answer > the question as the question contains a fallacy. Which I already addressed. You give him too much credit for understanding what I wrote. > >> Because you can’t learn them. > > He probably could, but apparently he does not want to. *That* is the problem. No, he really can’t. His mind has gone to mush, and he knows it. He won’t admit it, but he knows it. He has a freshman physics text, but he cannot read two paragraphs and understand them or retain them correctly. > >>> Your claim that these are terms that are not used within the *physics* >>> community (which extends beyond the community of *physicists*) is so >>> *obviously* wrong that it cannot be based on any data. >>> >>> IOW: You are lying. Why do you do that? > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 16:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <975fe699-f585-4144-9bdf-00b5342e6f74@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476132 |
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 7:21:40 AM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 6:39:00 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 11/2/2018 11:42 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > > >>> On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 6:45:48 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote: > > >>>> On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 3:28:26 PM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > >>>>> On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 5:23:21 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote: > > >>>>>> On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 8:55:57 AM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 7:18:47 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote: > > >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 4:09:33 PM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On Monday, October 29, 2018 at 3:31:23 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, October 29, 2018 at 7:58:18 AM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, October 28, 2018 at 4:59:53 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, October 28, 2018 at 9:13:08 AM UTC-7, Koobee Wublee wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, October 27, 2018 at 11:49:31 PM UTC-7, JanPB wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, October 27, 2018 at 8:27:34 PM UTC-7, Koobee Wublee wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let’s inquire the Einstein dingleberries if asking for a hypothesis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to support an experimental result is too much to ask. Does SR satisfy > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the null results of the MMX? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Learn physics. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Done just that. <shrug> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I cannot teach you here. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Koobee Wublee does not expect the queer of England who is a worshipper of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mysticism and bullshit to teach physics. <shrug> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Lying about your opponents is not a valid debating strategy. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> As far as "mysticism", you should study the history of electrodynamics > > >>>>>>>>>>>> sometime and see how Maxwell's theory introduced MANY problems (despite > > >>>>>>>>>>>> its obvious general success), esp. regarding reconciliation of "light > > >>>>>>>>>>>> as waves in aether" with "light as E and B fields satisfying Maxwell's > > >>>>>>>>>>>> equations". > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The two turned out to be EXTREMELY HARD to reconcile. One > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of the big problems was that in Maxwell's theory E and B fields in > > >>>>>>>>>>>> an electromagnetic wave must be transverse while all aether theories > > >>>>>>>>>>>> allowed longitudinal components. So people started inventing all sorts > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of "mystic" or "ad hoc" requirements that aether had to obey in order > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to get rid of the longitudinal components. Here is a partial list of > > >>>>>>>>>>>> people who worked on JUST this one detail: Navier, Poisson, Cauchy, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Green, Neumann, Lamé, Lord Rayleigh. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> This interpretation is wrong. A structured aether such as the > > >>>>>>>>>>> E-Matrix can indeed transmits light transversely and isotropically.....no > > >>>>>>>>>>> longitudinal component involved. The paper in the following link shows this > > >>>>>>>>>>> interpretation. > > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015experiment.pdf > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> There is nothing in this paper that supports your claim. It's FAPP all English > > >>>>>>>>>> prose. You need to discuss the relevant mathematical models in *full detail*, > > >>>>>>>>>> otherwise it’s just speculation. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I proposed a physical model of our universe that can explain all observations. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> No, you've just written a fantasy. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Less fantasy than field and virtual particles. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> You don't even understand "field" and "virtual particles", > > >>>>>> so how would you know? And in general, designating something you know > > >>>>>> nothing about as “fantasy" is not going to lead you anywhere. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I know what Weinberg say about the field in his book and that the > > >>>>> excitation of the field is the force messenger the boson. It is > > >>>>> probably that you don’t understand “field” and “virtual particle” and > > >>>>> you are trying to bullshit me. > > >>>> > > >>>> You have to understand what those words actually mean (in full technical > > >>>> detail, otherwise you cannot form a valid opinion). > > >>> > > >>> It appears that you have no understanding of those words. > > >> > > >> Ken’s mantra: Words mean what I say they mean. I don’t need to read books > > >> or listen to physicists about what the words mean. Everything that > > >> physicists say and everything in books is wrong. > > > > > > > > > I don't know about books and physicists, but pretty much everything you > > > say is wrong, Odd. Defining words to mean what you say they mean (like > > > say "wave" or "medium") is your idea of science. Obviously that is not > > > science but "philosopher" territory. > > > > Language is determined by the community in their context of usage. If you > > don’t like the community’s usage, then you will fall out of communication > > with them. > > > > Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). If you think they are hazy or vague, then you don't understand them. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 00:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <00e6886d-593a-4631-b0e2-0bb8ec83a1d8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476182 |
On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: > > Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? > > These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). Buhahahahahahahahaha.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Buck Dehner <uktoa@yswdoez.cb> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 12:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prmnrm$4e9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476198 |
mlwozniak wrote: > On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: > >> > Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such >> > terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time >> > dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all >> > observers....etc??? >> >> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, >> all of them). > > Buhahahahahahahahaha. I would second that. There is no convention in those terms means. Much less, as for instance, the fabric of spacetime. No mechanism presented, nor existent. Excellent post, thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 18:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prnecs$1bm8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476198 |
<mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: > >>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such >>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time >>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? >> >> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). > > Buhahahahahahahahaha. > > Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 14:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <prngfh$1eo0$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476235 |
On 11/4/2018 1:39 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: >> >>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such >>>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time >>>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? >>> >>> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). >> >> Buhahahahahahahahaha. >> >> > > Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. > Odd just makes up his own definitions for words. This keeps his science simple and consistent! Usually this sort of thing is termed "journalist science".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 22:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prnr0c$1pl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476237 |
benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/4/2018 1:39 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: >>> >>>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such >>>>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time >>>>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? >>>> >>>> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). >>> >>> Buhahahahahahahahaha. >>> >>> >> >> Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. >> > Odd just makes up his own definitions for words. This keeps his science > simple and consistent! Usually this sort of thing is termed "journalist > science". > You’re pinning something that belongs to the physics community on me. That won’t work. You’re the one disenfranchised, as you’ve said yourself. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 18:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <prnvoh$8u6$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476249 |
On 11/4/2018 5:14 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 11/4/2018 1:39 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such >>>>>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time >>>>>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? >>>>> >>>>> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). >>>> >>>> Buhahahahahahahahaha. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. >>> >> Odd just makes up his own definitions for words. This keeps his science >> simple and consistent! Usually this sort of thing is termed "journalist >> science". >> > > You’re pinning something that belongs to the physics community on me. That > won’t work. You’re the one disenfranchised, as you’ve said yourself. > Wrong. The physics community will make up new meanings for words (like say "spin") but they are carefully defined and everyone agrees on them. You on the other hand take words that are well defined and modify their meanings to suit your current arguments. (you know like Journalists do)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 00:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pro19e$at2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476257 |
benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/4/2018 5:14 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 11/4/2018 1:39 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such >>>>>>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time >>>>>>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? >>>>>> >>>>>> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). >>>>> >>>>> Buhahahahahahahahaha. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. >>>> >>> Odd just makes up his own definitions for words. This keeps his science >>> simple and consistent! Usually this sort of thing is termed "journalist >>> science". >>> >> >> You’re pinning something that belongs to the physics community on me. That >> won’t work. You’re the one disenfranchised, as you’ve said yourself. >> > Wrong. The physics community will make up new meanings for words (like > say "spin") but they are carefully defined and everyone agrees on them. > You on the other hand take words that are well defined and modify their > meanings to suit your current arguments. (you know like Journalists do) > > > Such as? -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 14:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prpllj$v8h$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476258 |
Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote: > benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 11/4/2018 5:14 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/4/2018 1:39 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>>>>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such >>>>>>>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time >>>>>>>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). >>>>>> >>>>>> Buhahahahahahahahaha. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. >>>>> >>>> Odd just makes up his own definitions for words. This keeps his science >>>> simple and consistent! Usually this sort of thing is termed "journalist >>>> science". >>>> >>> >>> You’re pinning something that belongs to the physics community on me. That >>> won’t work. You’re the one disenfranchised, as you’ve said yourself. >>> >> Wrong. The physics community will make up new meanings for words (like >> say "spin") but they are carefully defined and everyone agrees on them. >> You on the other hand take words that are well defined and modify their >> meanings to suit your current arguments. (you know like Journalists do) >> >> >> > > Such as? > So just another bullshit fling from Ben? -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gaston Castaneda <ucpp@java4ow.nv> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-12 19:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pscj0l$1rso$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476257 |
benj wrote: > On 11/4/2018 5:14 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 11/4/2018 1:39 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such >>>>>>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, >>>>>>> time dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all >>>>>>> observers....etc??? >>>>>> >>>>>> These are physics terms with very precise definitions >>>>>> (mathematical, all of them). >>>>> >>>>> Buhahahahahahahahaha. >>>> >>>> Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. >>> >>> Odd just makes up his own definitions for words. This keeps his >>> science simple and consistent! Usually this sort of thing is termed >>> "journalist science". >> >> You’re pinning something that belongs to the physics community on me. >> That won’t work. You’re the one disenfranchised, as you’ve said >> yourself. >> > Wrong. The physics community will make up new meanings for words (like > say "spin") but they are carefully defined and everyone agrees on them. > You on the other hand take words that are well defined and modify their > meanings to suit your current arguments. (you know like Journalists do) The relativity community moon landers are borrowing changed terminology as there is no tomorrow. Next big crash 2019.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-04 23:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <32557592-3764-433e-a96f-5673a2553eef@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476235 |
On Sunday, 4 November 2018 19:39:29 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > > On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: > > > >>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such > >>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time > >>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? > >> > >> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). > > > > Buhahahahahahahahaha. > > > > > > Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. You don't know them either. Jan has simply fabricated them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 12:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prpeqq$its$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476290 |
<mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > On Sunday, 4 November 2018 19:39:29 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: >>> >>>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such >>>>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time >>>>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? >>>> >>>> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). >>> >>> Buhahahahahahahahaha. >>> >>> >> >> Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. > > You don't know them either. Jan has simply > fabricated them. > > Nope. Sorry, your ignorance is showing. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 00:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <880ab8a4-7131-46d5-807f-b7de2cd2af8a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476300 |
On Monday, 5 November 2018 13:59:09 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > > On Sunday, 4 November 2018 19:39:29 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > >>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: > >>> > >>>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such > >>>>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time > >>>>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? > >>>> > >>>> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). > >>> > >>> Buhahahahahahahahaha. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. > > > > You don't know them either. Jan has simply > > fabricated them. > > > > > > Nope. Sorry, your ignorance is showing. Yes. But, being an idiot woodworker without any mathematical training - you have no clue what is "mathematical definition", of course.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 11:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prrvd9$lqe$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476397 |
<mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > On Monday, 5 November 2018 13:59:09 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 19:39:29 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such >>>>>>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time >>>>>>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? >>>>>> >>>>>> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). >>>>> >>>>> Buhahahahahahahahaha. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. >>> >>> You don't know them either. Jan has simply >>> fabricated them. >>> >>> >> >> Nope. Sorry, your ignorance is showing. > > Yes. But, being an idiot woodworker without > any mathematical training This is where you are wrong. What I do for a living doesn’t correlate with my schooling. I have degrees in mathematics and philosophy. > - you have no clue > what is "mathematical definition", of course. > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 04:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63592c04-c672-4a36-8e22-4a32745f85e0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476404 |
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 12:54:20 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > > On Monday, 5 November 2018 13:59:09 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > >>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 19:39:29 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > >>>>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such > >>>>>>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time > >>>>>>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). > >>>>> > >>>>> Buhahahahahahahahaha. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. > >>> > >>> You don't know them either. Jan has simply > >>> fabricated them. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Nope. Sorry, your ignorance is showing. > > > > Yes. But, being an idiot woodworker without > > any mathematical training > > This is where you are wrong. Sorry, poor idiot. Your revelations about Pythagorean theorem showed it clearly. > What I do for a living doesn’t correlate with > my schooling. I have degrees in mathematics and philosophy. What degrees?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 13:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prs5ca$10ct$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476405 |
<mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 12:54:20 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>> On Monday, 5 November 2018 13:59:09 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 19:39:29 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such >>>>>>>>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time >>>>>>>>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Buhahahahahahahahaha. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. >>>>> >>>>> You don't know them either. Jan has simply >>>>> fabricated them. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Nope. Sorry, your ignorance is showing. >>> >>> Yes. But, being an idiot woodworker without >>> any mathematical training >> >> This is where you are wrong. > > Sorry, poor idiot. Your revelations > about Pythagorean theorem showed it > clearly. > >> What I do for a living doesn’t correlate with >> my schooling. I have degrees in mathematics and philosophy. > > What degrees? > B.A., M.S. and you? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 05:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7887ff4a-1f92-4d14-b036-107b6b9808cb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476407 |
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 14:36:14 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 12:54:20 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > >>> On Monday, 5 November 2018 13:59:09 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > >>>>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 19:39:29 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such > >>>>>>>>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time > >>>>>>>>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Buhahahahahahahahaha. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. > >>>>> > >>>>> You don't know them either. Jan has simply > >>>>> fabricated them. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Nope. Sorry, your ignorance is showing. > >>> > >>> Yes. But, being an idiot woodworker without > >>> any mathematical training > >> > >> This is where you are wrong. > > > > Sorry, poor idiot. Your revelations > > about Pythagorean theorem showed it > > clearly. > > > >> What I do for a living doesn’t correlate with > >> my schooling. I have degrees in mathematics and philosophy. > > > > What degrees? > > > > B.A., M.S. And with B.A in mathematics you're extending mathematical theorems with the titles of chapters where they was written. Right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 18:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prsm8l$1vl3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476409 |
<mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 14:36:14 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 12:54:20 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>>>> On Monday, 5 November 2018 13:59:09 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 19:39:29 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, 4 November 2018 00:56:20 UTC+1, JanPB wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Then how come you physicists invented non-community usage for such >>>>>>>>>>> terms as: field/virtual, extra dimensions, length contraction, time >>>>>>>>>>> dilation, entanglement, constant light speed for all observers....etc??? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> These are physics terms with very precise definitions (mathematical, all of them). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Buhahahahahahahahaha. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Aaaand you don’t know them. Chickenshit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You don't know them either. Jan has simply >>>>>>> fabricated them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. Sorry, your ignorance is showing. >>>>> >>>>> Yes. But, being an idiot woodworker without >>>>> any mathematical training >>>> >>>> This is where you are wrong. >>> >>> Sorry, poor idiot. Your revelations >>> about Pythagorean theorem showed it >>> clearly. >>> >>>> What I do for a living doesn’t correlate with >>>> my schooling. I have degrees in mathematics and philosophy. >>> >>> What degrees? >>> >> >> B.A., M.S. > > And with B.A in mathematics you're extending > mathematical theorems with the titles of > chapters where they was written. Right? > I think you will find that most people understand hierarchical context. Now, it may be that in what you call “common sense”, the context has to be explicitly stated in the sentence describing the theorem, otherwise it doesn’t count. If you are limited in this way then you are welcome to live your puny life that way. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 23:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ec4a04c8-fca4-4104-ab7d-cc3a9d55abe1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476429 |
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 19:24:25 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > And with B.A in mathematics you're extending > > mathematical theorems with the titles of > > chapters where they was written. Right? > > > > I think you will find that most people understand hierarchical context. Odd, poor halfbrain, if you ever had ANY mathematical training you would know that math can't afford relying on context.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web