Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #470005 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-31 08:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-12-07 09:49 +0000 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 28 participants
Thread has 1627 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1627 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 08:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 15:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-31 10:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 17:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-31 11:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 18:40 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-31 12:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 21:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-31 21:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 14:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-01 09:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-09-02 11:23 -0400
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-02 09:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-09-02 14:44 -0400
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-02 11:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-09-02 15:57 -0400
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-02 13:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-09-02 17:25 -0400
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-02 14:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-09-02 19:51 -0400
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-02 22:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-31 20:37 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-31 12:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 12:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 21:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 16:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-01 00:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 18:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 01:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 20:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 01:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 20:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-01 03:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 05:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Fattore Nzavecchia <avcir@valecw.ba> - 2018-09-01 12:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 09:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-01 06:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 09:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-01 11:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 12:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 13:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 22:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-01 16:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-01 22:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-02 04:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-02 05:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-02 05:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-02 06:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Jeanclaude Erald <urdu@iufienv.vu> - 2018-09-02 12:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 07:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 07:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 18:57 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 12:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 20:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-02 19:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 21:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-03 03:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 05:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-03 10:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 18:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-03 19:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 19:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-03 20:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 20:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-04 03:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 07:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-04 14:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 16:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-04 23:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 18:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 00:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 18:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 11:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 15:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 09:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 19:32 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 13:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-05 14:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 17:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-05 19:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 21:40 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 17:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 19:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 14:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 22:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 15:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 22:57 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-06 23:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-05 22:11 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 17:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-06 02:53 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 20:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-06 05:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 07:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-06 07:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-06 07:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-06 16:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-06 10:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Haných Ltskáš <lnni@yawlucla.ha> - 2018-09-06 15:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 13:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-06 21:08 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 14:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-06 22:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-06 23:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-06 14:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 15:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-06 15:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 15:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-06 15:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-06 22:47 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 16:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-07 00:53 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 21:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-07 17:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 13:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-07 00:45 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 15:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-07 01:04 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-06 16:32 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 14:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 22:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 15:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 22:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-05 16:06 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 09:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-05 17:32 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 11:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 19:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 13:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 22:06 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 17:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 19:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 15:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 22:28 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 15:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 22:57 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 16:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 00:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 21:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 12:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-07 05:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 07:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 17:04 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 11:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 19:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 13:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 22:25 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 15:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 00:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 17:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-08 12:20 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 06:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-08 16:13 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 12:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 07:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-07 16:51 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 11:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-08 12:19 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 17:04 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 12:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-07 14:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 15:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-07 16:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 17:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-07 20:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 06:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-08 07:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 09:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-08 18:53 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 10:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-09 05:21 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 23:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-09 10:36 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-08 17:06 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 12:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-09 05:22 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 23:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-09 10:40 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 05:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-09 16:51 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 13:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 20:32 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-08 10:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 13:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-08 14:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 23:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-09 04:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Lorent Regoires <ewab@ewgvpq.gn> - 2018-09-09 11:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 06:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 05:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-09 12:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 17:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-09 19:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 19:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-09 20:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 21:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-10 04:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-10 05:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-10 06:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 08:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-10 08:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 09:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 03:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-10 12:56 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-10 06:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 09:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 16:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 10:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 17:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-10 09:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 10:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 09:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-11 04:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 21:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-11 12:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 08:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-11 10:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 16:40 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Wilbur Foley <boue@eywffl.uf> - 2018-09-10 16:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-07 21:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 22:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 15:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 00:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 17:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 01:26 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 18:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 13:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 06:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 15:19 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 09:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-08 17:15 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 12:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 17:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 13:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 22:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 23:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-09 04:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Lorent Regoires <ewab@ewgvpq.gn> - 2018-09-09 11:28 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 06:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 18:25 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 13:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 20:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 18:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 01:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 18:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 02:15 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 19:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 12:49 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 09:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-11 03:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 21:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 13:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 21:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 14:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 01:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 18:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 02:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-09-12 20:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-09-13 12:10 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-09-13 17:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 18:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaw.oa> - 2018-09-19 22:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 05:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 15:49 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-09 13:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-09 05:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-09 14:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-09 23:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-10 12:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 08:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 16:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 10:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 17:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 12:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 21:07 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 15:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 15:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 23:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 16:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 00:27 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 20:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 11:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 07:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-10 21:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-12 12:36 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 06:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-10 09:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 10:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 10:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 17:32 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 12:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 21:07 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 15:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 23:00 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 16:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 00:27 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 20:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 14:00 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 08:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 17:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 11:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 19:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 18:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-11 18:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 23:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-12 04:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 02:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 23:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 11:02 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 06:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 13:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 07:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-12 14:47 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 05:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 13:04 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-13 06:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 08:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 19:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 14:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 22:35 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 15:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-13 23:15 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 16:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 01:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 18:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 03:49 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 01:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 18:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-13 20:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-13 21:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-14 05:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 07:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-14 14:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 10:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-14 20:19 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 13:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-14 20:56 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 14:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 21:53 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-14 16:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 11:15 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 09:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-16 00:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 22:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-16 08:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-16 23:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-16 15:38 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 07:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 17:15 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 12:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 19:57 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 13:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 21:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 17:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 01:02 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 18:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-09-16 23:18 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 17:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-16 19:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 20:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 16:35 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 12:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 21:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 15:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 23:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 22:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 11:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 07:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 15:26 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 07:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-09-18 07:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 08:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-09-18 11:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-09-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 15:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-19 03:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 16:02 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 16:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 08:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 16:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-18 10:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 13:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 15:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 00:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 18:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-19 04:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-19 07:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-19 08:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-19 09:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-19 09:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-19 10:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 12:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 08:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-19 09:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 12:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-19 13:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 16:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-19 20:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 20:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-19 20:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 20:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-20 13:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 14:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-20 14:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaws.np> - 2018-09-20 22:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 15:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 15:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-20 17:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 17:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-20 19:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 20:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-21 05:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Stakos Netakis <autp@wsalaws.np> - 2018-09-21 16:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 09:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-21 12:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-21 18:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 02:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-22 06:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-23 04:11 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 22:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-23 05:32 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:43 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 12:01 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-22 07:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-22 07:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-23 04:07 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 22:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 21:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 18:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 11:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-23 04:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 22:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-23 05:47 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-23 03:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Rhett Joyner <udof@rsrrfirwv.on> - 2018-09-23 10:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 10:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-23 04:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-22 21:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 22:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-23 06:06 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 03:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-23 15:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 12:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-23 20:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 18:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-24 02:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 21:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-24 07:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 11:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-24 15:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 16:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 16:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 23:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 08:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:49 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 07:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-26 15:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-09-27 04:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 10:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 21:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 17:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 22:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 17:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 12:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-29 06:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 14:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 07:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:11 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 21:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 13:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 03:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 06:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 01:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 07:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 21:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 06:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 00:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 08:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 08:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 21:19 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 06:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 00:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 21:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 06:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 00:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 08:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 08:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 02:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:06 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 07:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 21:00 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 05:57 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 00:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 08:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 08:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 16:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 09:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 16:31 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 05:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 23:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 06:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 06:29 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 06:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:28 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 09:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:26 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 06:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:28 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 09:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:26 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 08:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 21:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 05:35 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 06:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 00:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 08:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 09:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 16:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 05:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 22:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 06:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 06:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:25 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 09:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-10-04 08:15 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 06:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-10-04 21:48 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@example.invalid> - 2018-10-06 15:27 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 15:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity ldzwinn@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 12:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity ldzwinn@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 12:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 23:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 08:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 08:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:57 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 09:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 16:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-28 23:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity ldzwinn@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 12:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 20:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-06 22:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 20:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-07 14:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 21:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-07 23:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-09-28 15:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 17:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-29 06:29 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 14:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-29 21:25 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 14:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 07:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-30 16:59 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 21:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 13:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 03:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 06:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 02:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:06 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 07:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-01 23:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-01 23:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:11 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 07:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-30 16:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:11 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 21:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-01 10:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-01 23:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 06:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-02 03:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-02 06:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:47 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-02 08:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 13:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity ldzwinn@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 12:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Paul Gish <uop@uwrwuao.tt> - 2018-10-06 19:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-27 21:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 15:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-26 09:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-09-27 04:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 10:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 21:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 17:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 08:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:49 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 22:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-23 06:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 03:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-23 15:08 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 12:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-23 20:25 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 14:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-23 23:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 18:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-23 19:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 21:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 23:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 07:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 19:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 20:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 21:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 17:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-09-27 04:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-27 05:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 10:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 20:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 21:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 21:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 17:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-24 02:31 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 21:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-24 18:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-24 11:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-24 22:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 16:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 23:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-25 00:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 19:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-25 03:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 23:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 07:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-26 15:08 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 15:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 21:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 17:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 21:57 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 18:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 12:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 14:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:06 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 21:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 13:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 03:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 05:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 02:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:19 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 09:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 21:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 23:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-01 23:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:55 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:19 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-02 08:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 09:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 21:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 23:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-03 00:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 08:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-03 02:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 08:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-03 09:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 18:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 05:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 04:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-04 21:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 23:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-05 06:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-05 00:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-05 12:31 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-05 06:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity ldzwinn@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 11:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 20:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 22:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 19:19 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 12:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 20:40 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-07 14:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 21:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-07 23:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 13:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-08 06:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 13:40 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-08 06:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 19:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 02:59 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-07 23:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-08 08:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 17:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-08 15:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 02:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-08 21:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 11:56 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-09 05:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 12:47 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-09 05:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-09 20:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 13:32 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-10 09:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 16:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-10 14:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 13:15 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 14:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 22:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 17:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:04 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 09:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 17:57 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-12 19:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-13 08:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 16:10 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-13 12:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 21:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-13 15:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 23:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-13 16:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 13:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-14 16:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 14:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-15 08:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 18:00 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-15 17:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 02:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-15 21:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 11:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 06:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 16:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 10:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 11:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 21:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 18:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 13:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 13:08 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 08:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 21:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 16:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 12:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-18 08:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 18:40 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 17:40 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 11:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 21:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 21:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 15:40 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-18 18:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 22:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 15:40 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-18 18:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-19 01:11 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-19 05:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-19 12:31 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-19 15:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 15:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-20 09:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 16:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-20 10:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 20:07 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-20 16:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-22 09:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-22 18:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-22 12:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-22 19:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-22 16:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-23 04:02 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-23 08:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-23 18:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-24 08:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-24 17:26 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-24 18:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-24 23:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-25 08:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-31 08:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-31 08:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-31 10:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 17:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-31 15:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 13:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-11-01 07:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 14:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-11-01 09:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 19:59 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-01 13:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-11-01 14:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 00:59 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-11-01 21:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 11:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 07:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 15:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-02 10:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 12:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 22:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 19:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 13:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 13:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 20:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-03 14:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 22:31 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 20:10 -0400
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-04 12:53 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Buck Dehner <uktoa@yswdoez.cb> - 2018-11-04 12:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-04 13:35 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 11:46 -0800
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 16:33 -0400
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 20:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 20:06 -0400
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 00:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 20:21 -0400
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 01:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 02:03 -0500
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:00 -0400
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-02 14:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 19:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-02 01:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-01 09:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-31 23:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 14:04 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 10:17 -0400
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-01 18:24 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-01 10:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-01 09:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 19:59 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-01 13:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 20:06 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-01 13:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-01 22:48 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-11-01 17:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 00:59 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-02 01:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 11:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-02 04:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-02 05:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-02 01:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 10:13 -0400
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-01 18:20 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-01 10:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 19:59 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 21:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 18:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 12:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 07:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 17:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-17 11:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-17 21:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 12:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-09 20:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 13:32 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-10 08:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-10 09:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 16:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-10 14:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 22:11 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-10 21:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 14:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 22:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 17:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 13:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-12 06:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-07 12:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-06 23:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 19:19 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-07 12:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 20:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-07 04:02 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 22:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 19:19 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 12:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 20:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-07 19:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-06 23:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 14:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-06 08:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity ldzwinn@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 12:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 20:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 06:53 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-05 00:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-05 15:53 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-05 21:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 15:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-06 08:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity ldzwinn@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 12:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-07 04:08 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 22:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 14:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-05 00:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 15:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-06 08:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-06 18:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity ldzwinn@gmail.com - 2018-10-06 12:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 09:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-09-30 22:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Talk.Origins@aol.com - 2018-10-03 03:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-10-31 13:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-10-31 14:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-31 15:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-11-01 03:32 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-10-31 21:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-06 16:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity rbwinn3@gmail.com - 2018-12-06 10:00 -0800
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-12-07 09:49 +0000
Page 47 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-01 19:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prfluk$1900$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476011 |
<mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 15:04:51 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>> On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 18:44:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> >>>> Nor do they have high precision agreement with measured reality. >>> >>> A lie, as expected from fanatic trash. >>> Anyone can check at GPS - time (as defined >>> by your idiot guru himself) is galilean >>> with the precision of an acceptable error. >> >> A lie, as expected by fanatic trash. > > > GPS is there. Your lies won't save your > Shit, Odd. > > > Yes GPS is there. It doesn’t support Galilean time as you claim it does. You just don’t know what you’re talking about so you only rave and spit, which is all you know to do. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-01 13:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <807d9aaa-6cec-4cc2-b60a-aa550a8b4028@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476033 |
On Thursday, 1 November 2018 20:59:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:> > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 15:04:51 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 18:44:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> > >>>> Nor do they have high precision agreement with measured reality. > >>> > >>> A lie, as expected from fanatic trash. > >>> Anyone can check at GPS - time (as defined > >>> by your idiot guru himself) is galilean > >>> with the precision of an acceptable error. > >> > >> A lie, as expected by fanatic trash. > > > > > > GPS is there. Your lies won't save your > > Shit, Odd. > > > > > > > > Yes GPS is there. It doesn’t support Galilean time as you claim it does. Yes, poor idiot,. it does. You just don’t know what you’re talking about so you only rave and spit, which is all you know to do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-01 20:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prfmbr$19ot$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476036 |
<mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 20:59:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:> > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 15:04:51 UTC+1, >> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 18:44:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Nor do they have high precision agreement with measured reality. >>>>> >>>>> A lie, as expected from fanatic trash. >>>>> Anyone can check at GPS - time (as defined >>>>> by your idiot guru himself) is galilean >>>>> with the precision of an acceptable error. >>>> >>>> A lie, as expected by fanatic trash. >>> >>> >>> GPS is there. Your lies won't save your >>> Shit, Odd. >>> >>> >>> >> >> Yes GPS is there. It doesn’t support Galilean time as you claim it does. > > > Yes, poor idiot,. it does. No, sorry, it doesn’t. You really don’t know what you’re talking about. But go ahead and fume that you just don’t believe anyone that contradicts you. > You just don’t know > what you’re talking about so you only rave and spit, > which is all you know to do. > > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-01 13:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c83ed172-d581-4607-9191-652961bd9dfa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476039 |
On Thursday, 1 November 2018 21:06:23 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 20:59:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:> > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 15:04:51 UTC+1, > >> Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > >>>>> On Wednesday, 31 October 2018 18:44:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Nor do they have high precision agreement with measured reality. > >>>>> > >>>>> A lie, as expected from fanatic trash. > >>>>> Anyone can check at GPS - time (as defined > >>>>> by your idiot guru himself) is galilean > >>>>> with the precision of an acceptable error. > >>>> > >>>> A lie, as expected by fanatic trash. > >>> > >>> > >>> GPS is there. Your lies won't save your > >>> Shit, Odd. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Yes GPS is there. It doesn’t support Galilean time as you claim it does. > > > > > > Yes, poor idiot,. it does. > > No, sorry, it doesn’t. You really don’t know what you’re talking about. But > go ahead and fume that you just don’t believe anyone that contradicts you. > Yes, sorry, poor idiot, it does. You really don’t know what you’re talking about. But go ahead and fume that you just don’t believe anyone that contradicts your madness.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-01 22:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9584ed30-7a33-8807-adaa-79218445051c@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #476039 |
Odd Bodkin wrote:
> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>> On Thursday, 1 November 2018 20:59:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:> > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 15:04:51 UTC+1,
>>> Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> GPS is there. Your lies won't save your
>>>> Shit, Odd.
>>> Yes GPS is there. It doesn’t support Galilean time as you claim it does.
>>
>> Yes, poor idiot,. it does.
Good grief, he *still* does not get it. How many years has it been now,
four at least?
,-<https://link.springer.com/article/10.12942/lrr-2003-1>
|
| Relativity in the Global Positioning System
| --------------------------------------------
|
| Abstract
|
| The Global Positioning System (GPS) uses accurate, stable atomic clocks in
| satellites and on the ground to provide world-wide position and time
| determination. These clocks have gravitational and motional frequency
| shifts which are so large that, without carefully accounting for numerous
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| relativistic effects, the system would not work. […]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
From the oft-cited Ashby 2003. Dr. Neil Ashby (PhD in Physics from Harvard)
not only is a well-known physicist and now Professor Emeritus of theoretical
math physics [sic] at the University of Colorado Boulder. Also, “[h]is work
was the basis of general relativistic correction being properly included in
the Global Positioning System” which make GPS work in the first place:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Ashby>
See also the equally oft-cited Pogge (current version: 2017-03-11):
<http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html>
(Dr. Richard W. Pogge is Professor of Astronomy at The Ohio State
University. He holds a PhD in Astronomy & Astrophysics from
the University of California, Santa Cruz.)
--
PointedEars
Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbwinn3@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-01 17:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fda6a42a-7dd7-4907-a78f-03124031f463@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476047 |
On Thursday, November 1, 2018 at 2:48:37 PM UTC-7, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> >> On Thursday, 1 November 2018 20:59:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:> > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 15:04:51 UTC+1,
> >>> Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>> GPS is there. Your lies won't save your
> >>>> Shit, Odd.
> >>> Yes GPS is there. It doesn’t support Galilean time as you claim it does.
> >>
> >> Yes, poor idiot,. it does.
>
> Good grief, he *still* does not get it. How many years has it been now,
> four at least?
>
> ,-<https://link.springer.com/article/10.12942/lrr-2003-1>
> |
> | Relativity in the Global Positioning System
> | --------------------------------------------
> |
> | Abstract
> |
> | The Global Positioning System (GPS) uses accurate, stable atomic clocks in
> | satellites and on the ground to provide world-wide position and time
> | determination. These clocks have gravitational and motional frequency
> | shifts which are so large that, without carefully accounting for numerous
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> | relativistic effects, the system would not work. […]
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> From the oft-cited Ashby 2003. Dr. Neil Ashby (PhD in Physics from Harvard)
> not only is a well-known physicist and now Professor Emeritus of theoretical
> math physics [sic] at the University of Colorado Boulder. Also, “[h]is work
> was the basis of general relativistic correction being properly included in
> the Global Positioning System” which make GPS work in the first place:
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Ashby>
>
> See also the equally oft-cited Pogge (current version: 2017-03-11):
>
> <http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html>
>
> (Dr. Richard W. Pogge is Professor of Astronomy at The Ohio State
> University. He holds a PhD in Astronomy & Astrophysics from
> the University of California, Santa Cruz.)
>
> --
> PointedEars
>
> Twitter: @PointedEars2
> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
I get it. Scientists have been running experiments since 1905 to determine how motion and gravitation affect measurement of time. So scientists applied all of this information to GPS satellites and supposedly a clock in a GPS satellite had a rate similar to their predictions. That does not make their equations correct. I can look at the Lorentz equations and see right away what is wrong. They say that the times of two clocks with different rates result in the same velocity.
No, that is not how you work the mathematics. If you have two clocks with different rates, what is required is two sets of equations with different variables for time and velocity. Or you convert the time of one clock to the time of the other and use one set of equations.
But that is not what scientists have been doing for more than 100 years, so there will be a lapse in reason until this generation of scientists dies off and we get some younger scientists not afraid to use correct mathematics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 00:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prg7go$3v0$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476047 |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>> On Thursday, 1 November 2018 20:59:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:> > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 15:04:51 UTC+1, >>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>> GPS is there. Your lies won't save your >>>>> Shit, Odd. >>>> Yes GPS is there. It doesn’t support Galilean time as you claim it does. >>> >>> Yes, poor idiot,. it does. > > Good grief, he *still* does not get it. How many years has it been now, > four at least? It won’t make any difference. He is one of those people that simply says that his common sense rules, and if evidence flies counter to his common sense, then the evidence is to be disbelieved. And he believes further that this stance is commendable, and he has no intention of being persuaded otherwise. > > ,-<https://link.springer.com/article/10.12942/lrr-2003-1> > | > | Relativity in the Global Positioning System > | -------------------------------------------- > | > | Abstract > | > | The Global Positioning System (GPS) uses accurate, stable atomic clocks in > | satellites and on the ground to provide world-wide position and time > | determination. These clocks have gravitational and motional frequency > | shifts which are so large that, without carefully accounting for numerous > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > | relativistic effects, the system would not work. […] > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > From the oft-cited Ashby 2003. Dr. Neil Ashby (PhD in Physics from Harvard) > not only is a well-known physicist and now Professor Emeritus of theoretical > math physics [sic] at the University of Colorado Boulder. Also, “[h]is work > was the basis of general relativistic correction being properly included in > the Global Positioning System” which make GPS work in the first place: > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Ashby> > > See also the equally oft-cited Pogge (current version: 2017-03-11): > > <http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html> > > (Dr. Richard W. Pogge is Professor of Astronomy at The Ohio State > University. He holds a PhD in Astronomy & Astrophysics from > the University of California, Santa Cruz.) > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 01:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8e6b87b0-d3d8-4197-82a5-489cdb1d8bd9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476062 |
On Friday, 2 November 2018 01:59:09 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > > Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > >>> On Thursday, 1 November 2018 20:59:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:> > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 15:04:51 UTC+1, > >>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>> GPS is there. Your lies won't save your > >>>>> Shit, Odd. > >>>> Yes GPS is there. It doesn’t support Galilean time as you claim it does. > >>> > >>> Yes, poor idiot,. it does. > > > > Good grief, he *still* does not get it. How many years has it been now, > > four at least? > > It won’t make any difference. He is one of those people that simply says > that his common sense rules, Right, poor idiot - it does. Check at GPS. They could follow your idiocies, make clocks indicating your "time dilation", keeping your precious symmetry and being unusable. Or they could make clocks indicating t'=t and working. What did they choose? Common sense RULES. Your Shit never really had a chance. > and if evidence flies counter to his common > sense, then the evidence is to be disbelieved. Odd, poor idiot. You have NO evidence. You have only some delusions of unbeatable evidence.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 11:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prhcni$1riu$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476073 |
<mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > On Friday, 2 November 2018 01:59:09 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: >>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, 1 November 2018 20:59:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:> > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 15:04:51 UTC+1, >>>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>> GPS is there. Your lies won't save your >>>>>>> Shit, Odd. >>>>>> Yes GPS is there. It doesn’t support Galilean time as you claim it does. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, poor idiot,. it does. >>> >>> Good grief, he *still* does not get it. How many years has it been now, >>> four at least? >> >> It won’t make any difference. He is one of those people that simply says >> that his common sense rules, > > Right, poor idiot - it does. Check at GPS. > They could follow your idiocies, make > clocks indicating your "time dilation", > keeping your precious symmetry and being > unusable. > Or they could make clocks indicating t'=t > and working. > What did they choose? > Common sense RULES. Your Shit never really > had a chance. > >> and if evidence flies counter to his common >> sense, then the evidence is to be disbelieved. > > Odd, poor idiot. You have NO evidence. You > have only some delusions of unbeatable evidence. > Thanks for confirming your idiocy. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 04:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0aae2801-89e5-4a9a-98e0-735ea8f021db@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476078 |
On Friday, 2 November 2018 12:34:14 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > > On Friday, 2 November 2018 01:59:09 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > >>> Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > >>>>> On Thursday, 1 November 2018 20:59:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:> > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 15:04:51 UTC+1, > >>>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>> GPS is there. Your lies won't save your > >>>>>>> Shit, Odd. > >>>>>> Yes GPS is there. It doesn’t support Galilean time as you claim it does. > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, poor idiot,. it does. > >>> > >>> Good grief, he *still* does not get it. How many years has it been now, > >>> four at least? > >> > >> It won’t make any difference. He is one of those people that simply says > >> that his common sense rules, > > > > Right, poor idiot - it does. Check at GPS. > > They could follow your idiocies, make > > clocks indicating your "time dilation", > > keeping your precious symmetry and being > > unusable. > > Or they could make clocks indicating t'=t > > and working. > > What did they choose? > > Common sense RULES. Your Shit never really > > had a chance. > > > >> and if evidence flies counter to his common > >> sense, then the evidence is to be disbelieved. > > > > Odd, poor idiot. You have NO evidence. You > > have only some delusions of unbeatable evidence. > > > > Thanks for confirming your idiocy. You're welcome, poor halfbrain.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 05:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4bf7ca46-5d77-4d81-b02e-e53470b29efc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476078 |
On Friday, 2 November 2018 12:34:14 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > > On Friday, 2 November 2018 01:59:09 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > >>> Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > >>>>> On Thursday, 1 November 2018 20:59:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:> > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 15:04:51 UTC+1, > >>>>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>> GPS is there. Your lies won't save your > >>>>>>> Shit, Odd. > >>>>>> Yes GPS is there. It doesn’t support Galilean time as you claim it does. > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, poor idiot,. it does. > >>> > >>> Good grief, he *still* does not get it. How many years has it been now, > >>> four at least? > >> > >> It won’t make any difference. He is one of those people that simply says > >> that his common sense rules, > > > > Right, poor idiot - it does. Check at GPS. > > They could follow your idiocies, make > > clocks indicating your "time dilation", > > keeping your precious symmetry and being > > unusable. > > Or they could make clocks indicating t'=t > > and working. > > What did they choose? > > Common sense RULES. Your Shit never really > > had a chance. > > > >> and if evidence flies counter to his common > >> sense, then the evidence is to be disbelieved. > > > > Odd, poor idiot. You have NO evidence. You > > have only some delusions of unbeatable evidence. > > > > Thanks for confirming your idiocy. See, poor idiot - it's one of some reasons why your Shit starts from disabling common sense of its prey. Without common sense you will buy ANY bullshit as an unbeatable evidence...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-02 01:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6d1c314e-ae7f-4838-97f1-97348e53051f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476047 |
On Thursday, 1 November 2018 22:48:37 UTC+1, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Odd Bodkin wrote: > > <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: > >> On Thursday, 1 November 2018 20:59:19 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:> > On Thursday, 1 November 2018 15:04:51 UTC+1, > >>> Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> GPS is there. Your lies won't save your > >>>> Shit, Odd. > >>> Yes GPS is there. It doesn’t support Galilean time as you claim it does. > >> > >> Yes, poor idiot,. it does. > > Good grief, he *still* does not get it. How many years has it been now, > four at least? > > ,-<https://link.springer.com/article/10.12942/lrr-2003-1> > | > | Relativity in the Global Positioning System > | -------------------------------------------- > | > | Abstract > | > | The Global Positioning System (GPS) uses accurate, stable atomic clocks in > | satellites and on the ground to provide world-wide position and time > | determination. These clocks have gravitational and motional frequency > | shifts which are so large that, without carefully accounting for numerous > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > | relativistic effects, the system would not work. […] > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > From the oft-cited Ashby 2003. An idiot has SAID!!!! Simply must be true. In the meantime in the real world, howeever: if GPS clocks followed your insanity and desynchronize, what is the right path of clocks according to your idiot guru - GPS wouldn't work at all. Or would it, poor halfbrain?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-01 10:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <prf1lg$6fj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #475955 |
On 10/31/2018 1:44 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thursday, October 25, 2018 at 8:49:19 AM UTC-7, rbw...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> The Galilean transformation equations do not have a length contraction. >> > > Nor do they have high precision agreement with measured reality. > Come on Odd! There are large numbers of people her ALL of which know that Galilean transforms are the correct ones and Einstein is an idiot. You Dingleberries are out-voted. Climate change science has proved beyond any doubt that science is always proved by consensus! That makes you an idiot because you are out-voted! Give up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-01 18:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <3d7442f4-a52e-63e8-1a1f-1d8dab3f033a@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #475989 |
benj wrote: > On 10/31/2018 1:44 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thursday, October 25, 2018 at 8:49:19 AM UTC-7, rbw...@gmail.com wrote: >>> The Galilean transformation equations do not have a length contraction. >> >> Nor do they have high precision agreement with measured reality. ACK. > Come on Odd! There are large numbers of people her ALL of which know > that Galilean transforms are the correct ones and Einstein is an idiot. First of all, your argument is a fallacy: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum> Second: They *might* know that (you are merely projecting your opinion there), but what they know would be *wrong*. *That* what they know *is* wrong is shown, for example, by the fact that there are applications, like GPS, that are built on the assumption that the theories of relativity (among other contributions to science by Einstein) are a correct description of reality, and that are *working*. > You Dingleberries are out-voted. The (uninformed) majority opinion is not necessarily a good indicator about what is correct. In fact, as there are always fewer experts than laymen, the majority of any given population is almost certainly wrong about things that require a significant amount of expert knowledge, that require to be *studied*, like physics. So it can be argued that for a majority opinion to be correct, it requires at least one expert to convince a majority of the population of what is actually correct. Case in point: The *fact* that climate change is happening and that it is mostly human-made. (How strange, how deeply illogical, a behavior to first assert superiority over all other lifeforms of a planet, and then to deny the responsibilities that come with that.) -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-01 10:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <04590923-bc18-4562-bef4-ae169f4c919a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476019 |
On Thursday, 1 November 2018 18:20:37 UTC+1, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > benj wrote: > > On 10/31/2018 1:44 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Thursday, October 25, 2018 at 8:49:19 AM UTC-7, rbw...@gmail.com wrote: > >>> The Galilean transformation equations do not have a length contraction. > >> > >> Nor do they have high precision agreement with measured reality. > > ACK. > > > Come on Odd! There are large numbers of people her ALL of which know > > that Galilean transforms are the correct ones and Einstein is an idiot. > > First of all, your argument is a fallacy: > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum> > > Second: They *might* know that (you are merely projecting your opinion > there), but what they know would be *wrong*. > > *That* what they know *is* wrong is shown, for example, by the fact that > there are applications, like GPS, that are built on the assumption that the > theories of relativity (among other contributions to science by Einstein) > are a correct description of reality A lie, as expected from fanatic trash. GPS was built on the assumption that proper clocks are indicating t'=t. Anyone can check in the documentation or in the reality. > and that are *working*. Surely they are. And if they follow these nonsensical "standards" your Shit is trying to force - they wouldn't. > The (uninformed) majority opinion is not necessarily a good indicator about > what is correct. It's always better, however, than the opinion of some brainwashed cultist of an insane guru.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-01 19:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prflul$1900$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #476019 |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> wrote: > benj wrote: >> On 10/31/2018 1:44 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Thursday, October 25, 2018 at 8:49:19 AM UTC-7, rbw...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> The Galilean transformation equations do not have a length contraction. >>> >>> Nor do they have high precision agreement with measured reality. > > ACK. > >> Come on Odd! There are large numbers of people her ALL of which know >> that Galilean transforms are the correct ones and Einstein is an idiot. > > First of all, your argument is a fallacy: Ben knows that. He’s just stirring the sediment up for fun, and you bit. > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum> > > Second: They *might* know that (you are merely projecting your opinion > there), but what they know would be *wrong*. > > *That* what they know *is* wrong is shown, for example, by the fact that > there are applications, like GPS, that are built on the assumption that the > theories of relativity (among other contributions to science by Einstein) > are a correct description of reality, and that are *working*. > >> You Dingleberries are out-voted. > > The (uninformed) majority opinion is not necessarily a good indicator about > what is correct. In fact, as there are always fewer experts than laymen, > the majority of any given population is almost certainly wrong about things > that require a significant amount of expert knowledge, that require to > be *studied*, like physics. > > So it can be argued that for a majority opinion to be correct, it requires > at least one expert to convince a majority of the population of what is > actually correct. Case in point: The *fact* that climate change is > happening and that it is mostly human-made. (How strange, how deeply > illogical, a behavior to first assert superiority over all other lifeforms > of a planet, and then to deny the responsibilities that come with that.) > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-16 21:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pq5k1t$1vf8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #475037 |
<rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 9:38:12 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 4:24:40 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> Legislatures are empowered to make laws. The Supreme Court is not. You >>>>> do not see me trying to run for office, do you? >>>>> There are unconstitutional laws in this state to prevent independent >>>>> voters from running for office. >>>> >>>> So ignore them, as you do court decisions. >>> >>> Why? >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Let’s see how being a scofflaw works for you. >>>>>> >>>>> Scofflaw? Which laws do you claim I was scoffing at? >>>> >>>> Ignoring a court decision is another way to be a scofflaw. >>>> >>> Courts do not make laws. The verdict of a court is an opinion, not a law. >>> Unlike a law, an opinion can be appealed to a higher court. >>> >>>>>>> It just applies to the case for which it was made. >>>>>> >>>>>> And yet, they are used as precedents in subsequent judgments. All the time. >>>>>> >>>>> Lawyers have to base their decisions on something. They are not going to >>>>> use the Constitution. >>>> >>>> So do judges, basing decisions on previous cases. >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> As far as I can tell, Lincoln was the only other American besides me who >>>>>>> understood the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. >>>>>> >>>>>> He also got a constitutional amendment passed. >>>>>> >>>>> Yes, he did. He was very knowledgeable about government. >>>> >>>> So you know what to do. >>> >>> Yes, I do. I follow laws, not court opinions. >>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Constitution is written in English. It says that I have the right to >>>>>>>>> trial by jury in all criminal prosecutions. So now you say you want to >>>>>>>>> take away that right, and you have enlisted the help of nine >>>>>>>>> feeble-minded lawyers. Sorry, you cannot do it without amending the >>>>>>>>> Constitution. I am like the Jews who were gassed to death in Auschwitz. >>>>>>>>> They had the right to live. The fact that they were killed by the >>>>>>>>> representatives of a political party did not take away that right. It >>>>>>>>> means that their right was denied by criminals. But, obviously, you >>>>>>>>> would say, We have already killed 60,000,000 American children by Supreme >>>>>>>>> Court decree. We can certainly take away the right to trial by jury. >>>>>>>>> The Supreme Court also enforced slavery in the United States for sixty >>>>>>>>> years. Then Abraham Lincoln came along and put the Supreme Court in its >>>>>>>>> place. Ignore the Dred Scott decision, he told Americans. It was >>>>>>>>> a wrong decision. >>>>>>>>> Then he wrote the Emancipation >>>>>>>>> Proclamation. Then he persuaded >>>>>>>>> Congress to pass the Thirteenth Amendment. >>>>>>>>> See how it works? >>>>>>>>> There is more to the United States government than nine feeble-minded >>>>>>>>> lawyers, whatever you may believe personally. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, there is the possibility of a Constitutional amendment stating that >>>>>>>> the states have no purview over petty crimes. You could suggest that. Let’s >>>>>>>> see how far that goes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Whenever these criminals take me before a court, I just ask for trial by >>>>>>> jury and let the judge know that I know how to appeal the case. They >>>>>>> always find me not guilty. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ok, so you have no way to exercise an appeal, do you? >>>>>> >>>>> If I am not guilty, I do not need to appeal. >>>>> They do not find me guilty because they do not want me appealing. >>>> >>>> What makes you say that? You just said you were found not guilty because >>>> you were not guilty. Or are you saying you were in fact guilty but they >>>> found you not guilty to avoid the appeal? >>>> >>> They had me in front of their court to prove how powerful they are. >> >> Nice masking. Nine arrests and arraignments for disorderly conduct don’t >> come from telling a police officer no. Somebody complained about your >> disorderly conduct and the police responded. You seem to say you were just >> minding your own business and police banged on your door to arrest you for >> disorderly conduct. Nine times. > > As a matter of fact, I said seven, not nine. Most of those seven times > took place in Mesa, Arizona, and I was the one who called the police with > regard to some pet drug dealers the police had in the neighborhood where > I lived. The last incident took place during a traffic stop in which I > was a passenger in a vehicle. > Passenger, get out of the vehicle. > Passenger, walk to the rear of the vehicle. > Step away from the vehicle. > That was when I told the police officer to find someone else to play his game with. > You think that violates the law. That's fine. Maybe you will want to > tell the police where I am. I am in Moyie Springs, Idaho, right now. > Send them by. I enjoy talking to police and judges. >> >>> They are not afraid of killing 60,000,000 American children. If they see >>> someone doing something that needs to be done, they can stop it from >>> happening. They can make life miserable. I had better respect what they do. >>> So then I am brought in front of them because I told their police state >>> police, No, with regard to something they told me to do. >>> It is a foregone conclusion. I need to be taught a lesson. Then they >>> find out that I know how to appeal a case, and everything changes. They >>> do not want their phony little case against me going before another court >>> because the other court is going to find fault with them for not >>> resolving the matter. So they find me not guilty. That is just how the >>> system works. There is nothing you can do about it. I am going to be >>> found not guilty every time. >>> You might say that it is because they charge me with offenses that are >>> too small. No, when the Bundys were locked up, Ryan Bundy and I >>> exchanged a few letters. I told him that the best way for him to proceed >>> was to represent himself in court. If he had not done so, who knows what >>> would have happened? As it was, they were imprisoned two years waiting >>> for their speedy and public trial. But as soon as they were in court, >>> Ryan knocked it out of the ballpark. >>> So whenever you come around saying, I am threatening you with nine >>> feeble-minded lawyers, it does not really mean anything to me. I can use >>> the nine feeble-minded lawyers to my advantage. >>> Here is what you have to understand. Nine feeble-minded lawyers are not >>> the supreme law of the United States. If you want to find out what the >>> supreme law of the United States is, read the Constitution. >>>>> >>>>>> I’m curious about the nine petty crimes you were arraigned for. >>>>> >>>>> Mostly disorderly conduct or creating a disturbance for disagreeing with police. >>>> >>>> And you did disorderly conduct more than once? That’s being a scofflaw. Do >>>> you know what the law is surrounding orderly conduct? Or are you just >>>> ignoring that repeatedly? >>>> >>> If a police officer is wrong, I go ahead and tell him, You are wrong. >>> That does not violate any law. It just gives the police officer a chance >>> to decide what he is going to do. >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In the present case, there’s a fair amount in the public record about that >>>>>>>>>> Court’s interpretation of the Constitution, which you may disagree with but >>>>>>>>>> you certainly shouldn’t be ignorant of. The application of that clause in >>>>>>>>>> the Constitution, and in particular the boundary against states’ rights and >>>>>>>>>> in particular the domain of states over “petty crimes”, was one of the >>>>>>>>>> crucial outcomes of the 14th amendment. Now, as we’ve discussed before, you >>>>>>>>>> may consider the Supreme Court incompetent to interpret the Constitution, >>>>>>>>>> and you may feel that you’d do a better job of interpreting the >>>>>>>>>> Constitution, but until you get yourself appointed to the Supreme Court — >>>>>>>>>> which is theoretically possible — then you are in no capacity to do that >>>>>>>>>> with any effect. As you’ve seen, as the Supreme Court’s ruling that you are >>>>>>>>>> not entitled to a jury trial in petty offense cases has been applied in >>>>>>>>>> your case despite your wishes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As I said, I do not interpret the Constitution. I just believe what it says. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well, so do members of the Supreme Court. So no there’s the question about >>>>>>>> who has the authority to adjudicate in a difference of opinion about the >>>>>>>> meaning of what it says. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Supreme Court justices can do whatever they choose to do. That is the >>>>>>> way the system works. They cannot be held liable for any decision they >>>>>>> make. So they ruled in 1803 that they are a judicial dictatorship, >>>>>> >>>>>> During which time most of the authors of the Constitution were still alive >>>>>> and active in government. Hmmmm. >>>>>> >>>>>>> and have run that bluff since that time, which worked for them except for >>>>>>> a brief time when Lincoln was President. As Lincoln said, If the Supreme >>>>>>> Court justices make a wrong decision, ignore it. It only applies to the >>>>>>> case in which it is made. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You always have the right to bring forward a case like Duncan and Baldwin >>>>>>>> did. As I recall, Baldwin was convicted of an offense in the state of New >>>>>>>> York that held a one year imprisonment in a New York court that had no >>>>>>>> trial by jury. The case was brought before the Supreme Court in its >>>>>>>> appellate jurisdiction. Baldwin won that case, and his conviction was >>>>>>>> overturned. You see how it works? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, I know how much it means to you European socialists to be able to >>>>>>>>>>> control the lives of other people, but I have the right to work. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Not in this country. There is absolutely nothing in this country that >>>>>>>>>> ensures you the right to work in the vocation of your choice in the >>>>>>>>>> location of your choice. This may come as a huge disappointment and a clash >>>>>>>>>> with what you consider right and proper. You have the option to emigrate to >>>>>>>>>> someplace that has a Constitution and a Court that supports what you think >>>>>>>>>> is right and proper, like a right to work. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well, I know how easy it must seem to you socialists to stop all useful >>>>>>>>> work in the United States because of how easy it was to shut down the >>>>>>>>> lumber industry, but Cliven Bundy and his 900 cattle were a >>>>>>>>> little more difficult. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have barely more than passing interest in the Bundys. What I’m interested >>>>>>>> in is your false claim that you have the right to work in the industry of >>>>>>>> your choosing in the geographical region of your choosing. As far as I >>>>>>>> know, you have never held that right, as much as you would like for it to >>>>>>>> be otherwise. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was not making any claims. Your claim was that your political party >>>>>>> can stop anyone from working by putting an end to their employment. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not my claim at all. Sometimes one’s employment can disappear for a variety >>>>>> of reasons. You are the one seeking to blame political parties for that. >>>>>> >>>>>> You still don’t have any right to work at what you want where you want. >>>>>> >>>>> Yes, I know your feelings about that. Your political party will put a >>>>> stop to any kind of work I try to do. >>>> >>>> It’s not a feeling. It’s a fact. You do not have that right to be employed >>>> at what you want where you want in this country. I have absolutely no idea >>>> why you think you do. Cite a relevant clause in the Constitution if you >>>> like. >>> >>> Why? You have no regard for the Constitution. >> >> The Constitution is irrelevant here. >> There is no right to work called out in the Constitution. I understand that >> in some fictional world you imagine, that right is called out, so that you >> can complain that it’s been abridged for you, but I’m not interested in >> your fictional world of right to work and a powerless court. >> > OK, so you are a union goon. Nope. Don’t belong to a union. Don’t favor them. You STILL don’t have a right to work in your desired profession in your desired location in this country. No amount of label-flinging in my general direction will change that fact. Nor can you find anything in the Constitution that guarantees that right. > Union goons do not impress me much either. I have only worked on a few > union jobs in my life. I do not like labor unions. > >>> I say, Go ahead and try to stop me from working. You have done it a few >>> times, but I have more knowledge now. >> >> You and I have never met. I’ve never had any impact on your job situation. >> In the 1980s when you lost your job I was a small child. I do not live in a >> city, I do not live in an Eastern state, I do not belong to a political >> party. You are imagining things. > > It is the political philosophy I am referring to, not your physical > circumstances. I probably should have said European socialist, but I was > not thinking so globally. Well I’m not socialist or European, so this is just more label flinging. >> >>> Maybe you will be successful. All that means to me is that I find >>> something else to do. >> >> Exactly. You will go someplace else and find something else to do. You do >> not have the right to work at a favored job in a favored geographical >> location. You do not even have a socially or constitutionally protected >> right to work as a welder in Arizona. You have secured that part time work, >> even without a license, but there is no protected right to that. If you >> lose work as a welder in Arizona, you will have to find something else to >> do, or someplace else to go. >> >>> Instead of working in a sawmill, I weld steel parts for buildings. I >>> liked the sawmill better, but I can do the welding. I can always find >>> something to do. So we are back to the original question: Why did you >>> want all sawmills in the West shut down? >> >> Well, I know you are joking with that question because you know I don’t >> want that. I’m fine with them the way they are presently, and the present >> state is not that all the sawmills in the West are shut down, as you’ve >> admitted. >> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> It worked on the lumber industry, not so much on cattle. The Bundys >>>>>>> backed your side down big time. >>> > > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbwinn3@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-16 18:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dff5add4-b120-4272-9c61-eec05dcb27b9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475052 |
On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 2:09:22 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 9:38:12 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 4:24:40 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Legislatures are empowered to make laws. The Supreme Court is not. You > >>>>> do not see me trying to run for office, do you? > >>>>> There are unconstitutional laws in this state to prevent independent > >>>>> voters from running for office. > >>>> > >>>> So ignore them, as you do court decisions. > >>> > >>> Why? > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Let’s see how being a scofflaw works for you. > >>>>>> > >>>>> Scofflaw? Which laws do you claim I was scoffing at? > >>>> > >>>> Ignoring a court decision is another way to be a scofflaw. > >>>> > >>> Courts do not make laws. The verdict of a court is an opinion, not a law. > >>> Unlike a law, an opinion can be appealed to a higher court. > >>> > >>>>>>> It just applies to the case for which it was made. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And yet, they are used as precedents in subsequent judgments. All the time. > >>>>>> > >>>>> Lawyers have to base their decisions on something. They are not going to > >>>>> use the Constitution. > >>>> > >>>> So do judges, basing decisions on previous cases. > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> As far as I can tell, Lincoln was the only other American besides me who > >>>>>>> understood the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> He also got a constitutional amendment passed. > >>>>>> > >>>>> Yes, he did. He was very knowledgeable about government. > >>>> > >>>> So you know what to do. > >>> > >>> Yes, I do. I follow laws, not court opinions. > >>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The Constitution is written in English. It says that I have the right to > >>>>>>>>> trial by jury in all criminal prosecutions. So now you say you want to > >>>>>>>>> take away that right, and you have enlisted the help of nine > >>>>>>>>> feeble-minded lawyers. Sorry, you cannot do it without amending the > >>>>>>>>> Constitution. I am like the Jews who were gassed to death in Auschwitz. > >>>>>>>>> They had the right to live. The fact that they were killed by the > >>>>>>>>> representatives of a political party did not take away that right. It > >>>>>>>>> means that their right was denied by criminals. But, obviously, you > >>>>>>>>> would say, We have already killed 60,000,000 American children by Supreme > >>>>>>>>> Court decree. We can certainly take away the right to trial by jury. > >>>>>>>>> The Supreme Court also enforced slavery in the United States for sixty > >>>>>>>>> years. Then Abraham Lincoln came along and put the Supreme Court in its > >>>>>>>>> place. Ignore the Dred Scott decision, he told Americans. It was > >>>>>>>>> a wrong decision. > >>>>>>>>> Then he wrote the Emancipation > >>>>>>>>> Proclamation. Then he persuaded > >>>>>>>>> Congress to pass the Thirteenth Amendment. > >>>>>>>>> See how it works? > >>>>>>>>> There is more to the United States government than nine feeble-minded > >>>>>>>>> lawyers, whatever you may believe personally. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Yes, there is the possibility of a Constitutional amendment stating that > >>>>>>>> the states have no purview over petty crimes. You could suggest that. Let’s > >>>>>>>> see how far that goes. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Whenever these criminals take me before a court, I just ask for trial by > >>>>>>> jury and let the judge know that I know how to appeal the case. They > >>>>>>> always find me not guilty. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Ok, so you have no way to exercise an appeal, do you? > >>>>>> > >>>>> If I am not guilty, I do not need to appeal. > >>>>> They do not find me guilty because they do not want me appealing. > >>>> > >>>> What makes you say that? You just said you were found not guilty because > >>>> you were not guilty. Or are you saying you were in fact guilty but they > >>>> found you not guilty to avoid the appeal? > >>>> > >>> They had me in front of their court to prove how powerful they are. > >> > >> Nice masking. Nine arrests and arraignments for disorderly conduct don’t > >> come from telling a police officer no. Somebody complained about your > >> disorderly conduct and the police responded. You seem to say you were just > >> minding your own business and police banged on your door to arrest you for > >> disorderly conduct. Nine times. > > > > As a matter of fact, I said seven, not nine. Most of those seven times > > took place in Mesa, Arizona, and I was the one who called the police with > > regard to some pet drug dealers the police had in the neighborhood where > > I lived. The last incident took place during a traffic stop in which I > > was a passenger in a vehicle. > > Passenger, get out of the vehicle. > > Passenger, walk to the rear of the vehicle. > > Step away from the vehicle. > > That was when I told the police officer to find someone else to play his game with. > > You think that violates the law. That's fine. Maybe you will want to > > tell the police where I am. I am in Moyie Springs, Idaho, right now. > > Send them by. I enjoy talking to police and judges. > >> > >>> They are not afraid of killing 60,000,000 American children. If they see > >>> someone doing something that needs to be done, they can stop it from > >>> happening. They can make life miserable. I had better respect what they do. > >>> So then I am brought in front of them because I told their police state > >>> police, No, with regard to something they told me to do. > >>> It is a foregone conclusion. I need to be taught a lesson. Then they > >>> find out that I know how to appeal a case, and everything changes. They > >>> do not want their phony little case against me going before another court > >>> because the other court is going to find fault with them for not > >>> resolving the matter. So they find me not guilty. That is just how the > >>> system works. There is nothing you can do about it. I am going to be > >>> found not guilty every time. > >>> You might say that it is because they charge me with offenses that are > >>> too small. No, when the Bundys were locked up, Ryan Bundy and I > >>> exchanged a few letters. I told him that the best way for him to proceed > >>> was to represent himself in court. If he had not done so, who knows what > >>> would have happened? As it was, they were imprisoned two years waiting > >>> for their speedy and public trial. But as soon as they were in court, > >>> Ryan knocked it out of the ballpark. > >>> So whenever you come around saying, I am threatening you with nine > >>> feeble-minded lawyers, it does not really mean anything to me. I can use > >>> the nine feeble-minded lawyers to my advantage. > >>> Here is what you have to understand. Nine feeble-minded lawyers are not > >>> the supreme law of the United States. If you want to find out what the > >>> supreme law of the United States is, read the Constitution. > >>>>> > >>>>>> I’m curious about the nine petty crimes you were arraigned for. > >>>>> > >>>>> Mostly disorderly conduct or creating a disturbance for disagreeing with police. > >>>> > >>>> And you did disorderly conduct more than once? That’s being a scofflaw. Do > >>>> you know what the law is surrounding orderly conduct? Or are you just > >>>> ignoring that repeatedly? > >>>> > >>> If a police officer is wrong, I go ahead and tell him, You are wrong. > >>> That does not violate any law. It just gives the police officer a chance > >>> to decide what he is going to do. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> In the present case, there’s a fair amount in the public record about that > >>>>>>>>>> Court’s interpretation of the Constitution, which you may disagree with but > >>>>>>>>>> you certainly shouldn’t be ignorant of. The application of that clause in > >>>>>>>>>> the Constitution, and in particular the boundary against states’ rights and > >>>>>>>>>> in particular the domain of states over “petty crimes”, was one of the > >>>>>>>>>> crucial outcomes of the 14th amendment. Now, as we’ve discussed before, you > >>>>>>>>>> may consider the Supreme Court incompetent to interpret the Constitution, > >>>>>>>>>> and you may feel that you’d do a better job of interpreting the > >>>>>>>>>> Constitution, but until you get yourself appointed to the Supreme Court — > >>>>>>>>>> which is theoretically possible — then you are in no capacity to do that > >>>>>>>>>> with any effect. As you’ve seen, as the Supreme Court’s ruling that you are > >>>>>>>>>> not entitled to a jury trial in petty offense cases has been applied in > >>>>>>>>>> your case despite your wishes. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> As I said, I do not interpret the Constitution. I just believe what it says. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Well, so do members of the Supreme Court. So no there’s the question about > >>>>>>>> who has the authority to adjudicate in a difference of opinion about the > >>>>>>>> meaning of what it says. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Supreme Court justices can do whatever they choose to do. That is the > >>>>>>> way the system works. They cannot be held liable for any decision they > >>>>>>> make. So they ruled in 1803 that they are a judicial dictatorship, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> During which time most of the authors of the Constitution were still alive > >>>>>> and active in government. Hmmmm. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> and have run that bluff since that time, which worked for them except for > >>>>>>> a brief time when Lincoln was President. As Lincoln said, If the Supreme > >>>>>>> Court justices make a wrong decision, ignore it. It only applies to the > >>>>>>> case in which it is made. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You always have the right to bring forward a case like Duncan and Baldwin > >>>>>>>> did. As I recall, Baldwin was convicted of an offense in the state of New > >>>>>>>> York that held a one year imprisonment in a New York court that had no > >>>>>>>> trial by jury. The case was brought before the Supreme Court in its > >>>>>>>> appellate jurisdiction. Baldwin won that case, and his conviction was > >>>>>>>> overturned. You see how it works? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Well, I know how much it means to you European socialists to be able to > >>>>>>>>>>> control the lives of other people, but I have the right to work. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Not in this country. There is absolutely nothing in this country that > >>>>>>>>>> ensures you the right to work in the vocation of your choice in the > >>>>>>>>>> location of your choice. This may come as a huge disappointment and a clash > >>>>>>>>>> with what you consider right and proper. You have the option to emigrate to > >>>>>>>>>> someplace that has a Constitution and a Court that supports what you think > >>>>>>>>>> is right and proper, like a right to work. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Well, I know how easy it must seem to you socialists to stop all useful > >>>>>>>>> work in the United States because of how easy it was to shut down the > >>>>>>>>> lumber industry, but Cliven Bundy and his 900 cattle were a > >>>>>>>>> little more difficult. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I have barely more than passing interest in the Bundys. What I’m interested > >>>>>>>> in is your false claim that you have the right to work in the industry of > >>>>>>>> your choosing in the geographical region of your choosing. As far as I > >>>>>>>> know, you have never held that right, as much as you would like for it to > >>>>>>>> be otherwise. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I was not making any claims. Your claim was that your political party > >>>>>>> can stop anyone from working by putting an end to their employment. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Not my claim at all. Sometimes one’s employment can disappear for a variety > >>>>>> of reasons. You are the one seeking to blame political parties for that. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You still don’t have any right to work at what you want where you want. > >>>>>> > >>>>> Yes, I know your feelings about that. Your political party will put a > >>>>> stop to any kind of work I try to do. > >>>> > >>>> It’s not a feeling. It’s a fact. You do not have that right to be employed > >>>> at what you want where you want in this country. I have absolutely no idea > >>>> why you think you do. Cite a relevant clause in the Constitution if you > >>>> like. > >>> > >>> Why? You have no regard for the Constitution. > >> > >> The Constitution is irrelevant here. > >> There is no right to work called out in the Constitution. I understand that > >> in some fictional world you imagine, that right is called out, so that you > >> can complain that it’s been abridged for you, but I’m not interested in > >> your fictional world of right to work and a powerless court. > >> > > OK, so you are a union goon. > > Nope. Don’t belong to a union. Don’t favor them. You STILL don’t have a > right to work in your desired profession in your desired location in this > country. No amount of label-flinging in my general direction will change > that fact. Nor can you find anything in the Constitution that guarantees > that right. Well, what you are saying is that you and your political party have the right to shut down any work that is useful.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-17 12:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pq7bgb$mm9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #475066 |
<rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 2:09:22 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 9:38:12 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 4:24:40 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Legislatures are empowered to make laws. The Supreme Court is not. You >>>>>>> do not see me trying to run for office, do you? >>>>>>> There are unconstitutional laws in this state to prevent independent >>>>>>> voters from running for office. >>>>>> >>>>>> So ignore them, as you do court decisions. >>>>> >>>>> Why? >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let’s see how being a scofflaw works for you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Scofflaw? Which laws do you claim I was scoffing at? >>>>>> >>>>>> Ignoring a court decision is another way to be a scofflaw. >>>>>> >>>>> Courts do not make laws. The verdict of a court is an opinion, not a law. >>>>> Unlike a law, an opinion can be appealed to a higher court. >>>>> >>>>>>>>> It just applies to the case for which it was made. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And yet, they are used as precedents in subsequent judgments. All the time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lawyers have to base their decisions on something. They are not going to >>>>>>> use the Constitution. >>>>>> >>>>>> So do judges, basing decisions on previous cases. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As far as I can tell, Lincoln was the only other American besides me who >>>>>>>>> understood the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He also got a constitutional amendment passed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, he did. He was very knowledgeable about government. >>>>>> >>>>>> So you know what to do. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, I do. I follow laws, not court opinions. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The Constitution is written in English. It says that I have the right to >>>>>>>>>>> trial by jury in all criminal prosecutions. So now you say you want to >>>>>>>>>>> take away that right, and you have enlisted the help of nine >>>>>>>>>>> feeble-minded lawyers. Sorry, you cannot do it without amending the >>>>>>>>>>> Constitution. I am like the Jews who were gassed to death in Auschwitz. >>>>>>>>>>> They had the right to live. The fact that they were killed by the >>>>>>>>>>> representatives of a political party did not take away that right. It >>>>>>>>>>> means that their right was denied by criminals. But, obviously, you >>>>>>>>>>> would say, We have already killed 60,000,000 American children by Supreme >>>>>>>>>>> Court decree. We can certainly take away the right to trial by jury. >>>>>>>>>>> The Supreme Court also enforced slavery in the United States for sixty >>>>>>>>>>> years. Then Abraham Lincoln came along and put the Supreme Court in its >>>>>>>>>>> place. Ignore the Dred Scott decision, he told Americans. It was >>>>>>>>>>> a wrong decision. >>>>>>>>>>> Then he wrote the Emancipation >>>>>>>>>>> Proclamation. Then he persuaded >>>>>>>>>>> Congress to pass the Thirteenth Amendment. >>>>>>>>>>> See how it works? >>>>>>>>>>> There is more to the United States government than nine feeble-minded >>>>>>>>>>> lawyers, whatever you may believe personally. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yes, there is the possibility of a Constitutional amendment stating that >>>>>>>>>> the states have no purview over petty crimes. You could suggest that. Let’s >>>>>>>>>> see how far that goes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Whenever these criminals take me before a court, I just ask for trial by >>>>>>>>> jury and let the judge know that I know how to appeal the case. They >>>>>>>>> always find me not guilty. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ok, so you have no way to exercise an appeal, do you? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I am not guilty, I do not need to appeal. >>>>>>> They do not find me guilty because they do not want me appealing. >>>>>> >>>>>> What makes you say that? You just said you were found not guilty because >>>>>> you were not guilty. Or are you saying you were in fact guilty but they >>>>>> found you not guilty to avoid the appeal? >>>>>> >>>>> They had me in front of their court to prove how powerful they are. >>>> >>>> Nice masking. Nine arrests and arraignments for disorderly conduct don’t >>>> come from telling a police officer no. Somebody complained about your >>>> disorderly conduct and the police responded. You seem to say you were just >>>> minding your own business and police banged on your door to arrest you for >>>> disorderly conduct. Nine times. >>> >>> As a matter of fact, I said seven, not nine. Most of those seven times >>> took place in Mesa, Arizona, and I was the one who called the police with >>> regard to some pet drug dealers the police had in the neighborhood where >>> I lived. The last incident took place during a traffic stop in which I >>> was a passenger in a vehicle. >>> Passenger, get out of the vehicle. >>> Passenger, walk to the rear of the vehicle. >>> Step away from the vehicle. >>> That was when I told the police officer to find someone else to play his game with. >>> You think that violates the law. That's fine. Maybe you will want to >>> tell the police where I am. I am in Moyie Springs, Idaho, right now. >>> Send them by. I enjoy talking to police and judges. >>>> >>>>> They are not afraid of killing 60,000,000 American children. If they see >>>>> someone doing something that needs to be done, they can stop it from >>>>> happening. They can make life miserable. I had better respect what they do. >>>>> So then I am brought in front of them because I told their police state >>>>> police, No, with regard to something they told me to do. >>>>> It is a foregone conclusion. I need to be taught a lesson. Then they >>>>> find out that I know how to appeal a case, and everything changes. They >>>>> do not want their phony little case against me going before another court >>>>> because the other court is going to find fault with them for not >>>>> resolving the matter. So they find me not guilty. That is just how the >>>>> system works. There is nothing you can do about it. I am going to be >>>>> found not guilty every time. >>>>> You might say that it is because they charge me with offenses that are >>>>> too small. No, when the Bundys were locked up, Ryan Bundy and I >>>>> exchanged a few letters. I told him that the best way for him to proceed >>>>> was to represent himself in court. If he had not done so, who knows what >>>>> would have happened? As it was, they were imprisoned two years waiting >>>>> for their speedy and public trial. But as soon as they were in court, >>>>> Ryan knocked it out of the ballpark. >>>>> So whenever you come around saying, I am threatening you with nine >>>>> feeble-minded lawyers, it does not really mean anything to me. I can use >>>>> the nine feeble-minded lawyers to my advantage. >>>>> Here is what you have to understand. Nine feeble-minded lawyers are not >>>>> the supreme law of the United States. If you want to find out what the >>>>> supreme law of the United States is, read the Constitution. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I’m curious about the nine petty crimes you were arraigned for. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mostly disorderly conduct or creating a disturbance for disagreeing with police. >>>>>> >>>>>> And you did disorderly conduct more than once? That’s being a scofflaw. Do >>>>>> you know what the law is surrounding orderly conduct? Or are you just >>>>>> ignoring that repeatedly? >>>>>> >>>>> If a police officer is wrong, I go ahead and tell him, You are wrong. >>>>> That does not violate any law. It just gives the police officer a chance >>>>> to decide what he is going to do. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the present case, there’s a fair amount in the public record about that >>>>>>>>>>>> Court’s interpretation of the Constitution, which you may disagree with but >>>>>>>>>>>> you certainly shouldn’t be ignorant of. The application of that clause in >>>>>>>>>>>> the Constitution, and in particular the boundary against states’ rights and >>>>>>>>>>>> in particular the domain of states over “petty crimes”, was one of the >>>>>>>>>>>> crucial outcomes of the 14th amendment. Now, as we’ve discussed before, you >>>>>>>>>>>> may consider the Supreme Court incompetent to interpret the Constitution, >>>>>>>>>>>> and you may feel that you’d do a better job of interpreting the >>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution, but until you get yourself appointed to the Supreme Court — >>>>>>>>>>>> which is theoretically possible — then you are in no capacity to do that >>>>>>>>>>>> with any effect. As you’ve seen, as the Supreme Court’s ruling that you are >>>>>>>>>>>> not entitled to a jury trial in petty offense cases has been applied in >>>>>>>>>>>> your case despite your wishes. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As I said, I do not interpret the Constitution. I just believe what it says. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Well, so do members of the Supreme Court. So no there’s the question about >>>>>>>>>> who has the authority to adjudicate in a difference of opinion about the >>>>>>>>>> meaning of what it says. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Supreme Court justices can do whatever they choose to do. That is the >>>>>>>>> way the system works. They cannot be held liable for any decision they >>>>>>>>> make. So they ruled in 1803 that they are a judicial dictatorship, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> During which time most of the authors of the Constitution were still alive >>>>>>>> and active in government. Hmmmm. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and have run that bluff since that time, which worked for them except for >>>>>>>>> a brief time when Lincoln was President. As Lincoln said, If the Supreme >>>>>>>>> Court justices make a wrong decision, ignore it. It only applies to the >>>>>>>>> case in which it is made. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You always have the right to bring forward a case like Duncan and Baldwin >>>>>>>>>> did. As I recall, Baldwin was convicted of an offense in the state of New >>>>>>>>>> York that held a one year imprisonment in a New York court that had no >>>>>>>>>> trial by jury. The case was brought before the Supreme Court in its >>>>>>>>>> appellate jurisdiction. Baldwin won that case, and his conviction was >>>>>>>>>> overturned. You see how it works? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I know how much it means to you European socialists to be able to >>>>>>>>>>>>> control the lives of other people, but I have the right to work. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not in this country. There is absolutely nothing in this country that >>>>>>>>>>>> ensures you the right to work in the vocation of your choice in the >>>>>>>>>>>> location of your choice. This may come as a huge disappointment and a clash >>>>>>>>>>>> with what you consider right and proper. You have the option to emigrate to >>>>>>>>>>>> someplace that has a Constitution and a Court that supports what you think >>>>>>>>>>>> is right and proper, like a right to work. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, I know how easy it must seem to you socialists to stop all useful >>>>>>>>>>> work in the United States because of how easy it was to shut down the >>>>>>>>>>> lumber industry, but Cliven Bundy and his 900 cattle were a >>>>>>>>>>> little more difficult. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have barely more than passing interest in the Bundys. What I’m interested >>>>>>>>>> in is your false claim that you have the right to work in the industry of >>>>>>>>>> your choosing in the geographical region of your choosing. As far as I >>>>>>>>>> know, you have never held that right, as much as you would like for it to >>>>>>>>>> be otherwise. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I was not making any claims. Your claim was that your political party >>>>>>>>> can stop anyone from working by putting an end to their employment. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not my claim at all. Sometimes one’s employment can disappear for a variety >>>>>>>> of reasons. You are the one seeking to blame political parties for that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You still don’t have any right to work at what you want where you want. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, I know your feelings about that. Your political party will put a >>>>>>> stop to any kind of work I try to do. >>>>>> >>>>>> It’s not a feeling. It’s a fact. You do not have that right to be employed >>>>>> at what you want where you want in this country. I have absolutely no idea >>>>>> why you think you do. Cite a relevant clause in the Constitution if you >>>>>> like. >>>>> >>>>> Why? You have no regard for the Constitution. >>>> >>>> The Constitution is irrelevant here. >>>> There is no right to work called out in the Constitution. I understand that >>>> in some fictional world you imagine, that right is called out, so that you >>>> can complain that it’s been abridged for you, but I’m not interested in >>>> your fictional world of right to work and a powerless court. >>>> >>> OK, so you are a union goon. >> >> Nope. Don’t belong to a union. Don’t favor them. You STILL don’t have a >> right to work in your desired profession in your desired location in this >> country. No amount of label-flinging in my general direction will change >> that fact. Nor can you find anything in the Constitution that guarantees >> that right. > > Well, what you are saying is that you and your political party have the > right to shut down any work that is useful. > Work in a particular region can be shut down for any number of reasons in a free market economy: 1. Labor is cheaper elsewhere. 2. Raw materials are more plentiful and cheaper elsewhere. 3. Competitors from other locations are producing a better product that consumers like better. 4. Demand for the product is falling, either locally or more broadly. 5. Consumption of the resource or the activity of the industry is hostile to other more important objectives in the area, such as conservation, residential development, or other industries. 6. Union organization makes industry difficult in the region. 7. Trade tariffs or imposed quotas affect the interest in the product. 8. Workers are driven from the region because of bad health conditions or crime rate. This is not the handiwork of political parties, this is the handiwork of free market economy. This country is based on a free market economy with certain industries regulated. This is precisely the reason why there is no right or entitlement to work. People who want to work have to move to where their work is still being done or they have to choose work that is in demand. There is no right to work in the industry of your choosing and the location of your choosing. Here are some examples of other “useful work” that have declined here as a result of market forces: - Doormen and elevator operators - Horse breeding and care - Cotton farming - Tobacco farming - Steel manufacturing - Tire manufacturing - Wooden furniture making - Bank tellers - Taxi driving - Train conductors and engineers - Newspaper and periodical publishing - Apparel making - Paper mills - Rubber goods - Magnetic and optical storage media manufacturing None of these have declined because of political parties. They have declined because of free market forces. All of the workers in those industries consider it “useful work”, but they don’t whine and misplace blame the way you do. They just find work in industries that aren’t in the same state of decline and suck it up. Something you seem unable to do without bitterness. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbwinn3@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-17 07:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a9b88d1b-7fe9-41ec-b8b9-aabaaf5a878a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475092 |
On Wednesday, October 17, 2018 at 5:55:43 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> Nope. Don’t belong to a union. Don’t favor them. You STILL don’t have a > >> right to work in your desired profession in your desired location in this > >> country. No amount of label-flinging in my general direction will change > >> that fact. Nor can you find anything in the Constitution that guarantees > >> that right. > > > > Well, what you are saying is that you and your political party have the > > right to shut down any work that is useful. > > > > Work in a particular region can be shut down for any number of reasons in a > free market economy: > > 1. Labor is cheaper elsewhere. > > 2. Raw materials are more plentiful and cheaper elsewhere. > > 3. Competitors from other locations are producing a better product that > consumers like better. > > 4. Demand for the product is falling, either locally or more broadly. > > 5. Consumption of the resource or the activity of the industry is hostile > to other more important objectives in the area, such as conservation, > residential development, or other industries. > > 6. Union organization makes industry difficult in the region. > > 7. Trade tariffs or imposed quotas affect the interest in the product. > > 8. Workers are driven from the region because of bad health conditions or > crime rate. > > This is not the handiwork of political parties, this is the handiwork of > free market economy. This country is based on a free market economy with > certain industries regulated. This is precisely the reason why there is no > right or entitlement to work. People who want to work have to move to where > their work is still being done or they have to choose work that is in > demand. There is no right to work in the industry of your choosing and the > location of your choosing. > > Here are some examples of other “useful work” that have declined here as a > result of market forces: > > - Doormen and elevator operators > > - Horse breeding and care > > - Cotton farming > > - Tobacco farming > > - Steel manufacturing > > - Tire manufacturing > > - Wooden furniture making > > - Bank tellers > > - Taxi driving > > - Train conductors and engineers > > - Newspaper and periodical publishing > > - Apparel making > > - Paper mills > > - Rubber goods > > - Magnetic and optical storage media manufacturing > > None of these have declined because of political parties. They have > declined because of free market forces. All of the workers in those > industries consider it “useful work”, but they don’t whine and misplace > blame the way you do. They just find work in industries that aren’t in the > same state of decline and suck it up. Something you seem unable to do > without bitterness. None of those things happened in Lincoln County, Montana. Lawyers filed complaints with federal court. The court ruled that logging on federal lands would be stopped. The Forest Service stopped selling timber sales to citizens of Montana. So, in effect, the most useless people in American society were able to stop some of the most useful people from working. Then they tried the same thing on the cattle industry. It did not work because there were people like Cliven Bundy who said, These people are nothing but cattle thieves. Cliven Bundy was right. He and other private citizens owned cattle, not the federal government. The federal bureaucrats were unable to take the cattle away. But up to that point, federal agents had been stealing cattle right and left in the West. No one had been able to organize an effective opposition to this cattle stealing until the Bundys did it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 47 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web