Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #472886 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-09-28 14:47 -0700 |
| Articles | 13 on this page of 73 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 17:13 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-24 12:38 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 01:20 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 01:38 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 06:47 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:13 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 17:54 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 02:39 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 06:32 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:13 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 17:57 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 02:39 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-24 18:17 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Hilton Packett <wod@wcothr.ce> - 2018-09-24 20:09 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:29 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Hilton Packett <wod@wcothr.ce> - 2018-09-25 22:29 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) herbertglazier0@gmail.com - 2018-09-25 16:55 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-25 17:52 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 20:11 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-26 04:11 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:54 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-26 14:00 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-26 21:29 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 01:10 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-27 06:47 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:37 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-28 13:18 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 22:05 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-29 08:11 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 15:25 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-29 12:40 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-29 20:03 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:03 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-30 19:07 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:52 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-01 11:46 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:30 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-02 07:30 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:08 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 08:37 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-29 09:20 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 15:00 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:31 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-01 11:51 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:30 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-02 07:21 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:08 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:27 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-03 06:03 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-03 13:38 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-10-03 09:10 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 07:41 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:24 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-10-03 05:59 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 07:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 06:20 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-28 07:10 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-28 16:45 +0000
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 13:39 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-26 13:57 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-27 12:46 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 06:30 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-09-28 06:56 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 09:41 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 13:44 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 09:43 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 13:51 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:30 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 14:41 -0700
Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-09-28 14:47 -0700
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
| From | rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 13:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <684d21c2-6ce6-40c8-981f-fb2ba1fb04c9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473349 |
On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 10:10:25 AM UTC-4, kenseto wrote: > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 9:20:07 AM UTC-4, Edward Prochak wrote: > I invented the Pyramid Technique for doing physics No you did not lying ken. You *stole* the idea from others. >and that enabled me to think outside the box Liar, since you cannot think. If you cant solve a simple highschool algebra problem, then you cant think. > and that, in turn, enabled me to come up with the > revolutionary final theory of Model Mechanics. LIAR. You STOLE it from other kranks, and added your crap to it. You just made it worse. > No you were trying to refute my theory and you wanted me to > help you to do so and I refused. Since you refused to try to refute your theory, then you are not a scientist. Real scientist always try to refute their work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 13:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2e06de9b-647a-4fe9-bc90-d7aeb8aa8797@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473106 |
On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 11:11:52 PM UTC-4, rotchm wrote: > On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 8:52:52 PM UTC-4, kenseto wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 4:29:27 PM UTC-4, Edward Prochak wrote: > > > Hey idiot, I didn’t nym shifted.... > > It sounds as you did. You nym'ed as someone defending you. You are a cheater and a liar. > Assertion is not a valid argument. You are the one who is lying. You nym shifted from David DeHilster. You are a racist and clueless. The following link demonstrates my point: http://www.modelmechanics.org/dehister.pdf > > > Also IRT is not a subset of any other theory. > > Yes it is. You STOLE it from another crackpot, and put ur name on it and copyrighted it, just like de cheater you are. Remember, you DID admit to me this in the past, when I confronted you with an exact same copy of your irt. > Assertion is not a valid argument. You are the one who is lying. You nym shifted from David deHilster. You are a racist and clueless. The following link demonstrates my point: http://www.modelmechanics.org/dehister.pdf > Assertion is not a valid argument. You are the one who is lying. You nym shifted from David DeHilster. You are a racist and clueless. The following link demonstrates my point: http://www.modelmechanics.org/dehilster.pdf > > > Also IRT is not a subset of any other theory. > > Yes it is. You STOLE it from another crackpot, and put ur name on it and copyrighted it, just like de cheater you are. Remember, you DID admit to me this in the past, when I confronted you with an exact same copy of your irt. Liar....you are clueless. Go ask your dad for clues. > > > Also IRT is not a subset of any other theory. > > Yes it is. You STOLE it from another crackpot, and put ur name on it and copyrighted it, just like de cheater you are. Remember, you DID admit to me this in the past, when I confronted you with an exact same copy of your irt. Liar..... show me the exact same copy that IRT copied from. > > > Hilton Packett is not me. > > Assertion is not a valid argument. > > > Also IRT is not a subset of any other theory. > > Yes it is. You STOLE it from another crackpot, and put ur name on it and copyrighted it, just like de cheater you are. Remember, you DID admit to me this in the past, when I confronted you with an exact same copy of your irt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8335249d-954b-4101-8aa5-263ac7852b69@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473208 |
On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 4:57:04 PM UTC-4, kenseto wrote: > You are the one who is lying. You nym shifted from David DeHilster. > You are a racist and clueless. The following link demonstrates my point: > http://www.modelmechanics.org/dehister.pdf LOL, the link doesnt work. See how much you LIE!!? s not a valid argument. > You are the one who is lying. You nym shifted from David > deHilster. You are a racist and clueless. The following link > demonstrates my point: > http://www.modelmechanics.org/dehister.pdf Saying it twice does not make it any more true... And btw, the link doesnt work. > You are the one who is lying. You nym shifted from David DeHilster. > You are a racist and clueless. The following link demonstrates my point: > http://www.modelmechanics.org/dehilster.pdf Saying it three times doesnt make it any more true. And the link doesnt work. And who is this dehilster person? Stop trying to throw your problems onto others. You are a liar, a fraud & a cheater. If you did really invented irt, then prove it by giving us the answer of (-6)/(-3).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 12:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fd45e36b-2b6c-4f43-a7d1-2c5116f61d39@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473214 |
On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 5:42:33 PM UTC-4, rotchm wrote: > On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 4:57:04 PM UTC-4, kenseto wrote: > > > > You are the one who is lying. You nym shifted from David DeHilster. > > You are a racist and clueless. The following link demonstrates my point: > > http://www.modelmechanics.org/dehister.pdf > > LOL, the link doesnt work. See how much you LIE!!? > s not a valid argument. > > > You are the one who is lying. You nym shifted from David > > deHilster. You are a racist and clueless. The following link > > demonstrates my point: > > http://www.modelmechanics.org/dehister.pdf > > Saying it twice does not make it any more true... And btw, the link doesnt work. > > > > You are the one who is lying. You nym shifted from David DeHilster. > > You are a racist and clueless. The following link demonstrates my point: > > http://www.modelmechanics.org/dehilster.pdf > > Saying it three times doesnt make it any more true. > And the link doesnt work. And who is this dehilster person? You are David deHilster and you are a liar. The link: http://www.modelmechanicns.org/dehilster works perfectly. > Stop trying to throw your problems onto others. You are a liar, a fraud & a cheater. If you did really invented irt, then prove it by giving us the answer of (-6)/(-3).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 06:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9f9861fb-a330-47ab-be22-13f12ba6ccb6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473298 |
On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 3:46:12 PM UTC-4, kenseto wrote: > On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 5:42:33 PM UTC-4, rotchm wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 4:57:04 PM UTC-4, kenseto wrote: > > [] > > > > > You are the one who is lying. You nym shifted from David DeHilster. > > > You are a racist and clueless. The following link demonstrates my point: > > > http://www.modelmechanics.org/dehilster.pdf This link does work, but it doesn't have ANY evidence connecting rotchm with dehilster. You need to calm down, Mr. Seto. > > > > Saying it three times doesnt make it any more true. > > And the link doesnt work. And who is this dehilster person? > > You are David deHilster and you are a liar. The link: http://www.modelmechanicns.org/dehilster > works perfectly. > Google begs to differ: This site can’t be reached www.modelmechanicns.org’s server IP address could not be found. Search Google for model mechanics org de hilster ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED It looks like you has stressed yourself to the point that you cannot type correctly the link to your own website. Time for you to unplug. go outside and enjoy some fresh air. Clear your head, then maybe you can come back and complete a simple calculation from your gravity equation. Enjoy, ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 06:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5c9bf82e-aac0-495e-b65b-85dad806de8e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473346 |
On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 9:30:21 AM UTC-4, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 3:46:12 PM UTC-4, kenseto wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 5:42:33 PM UTC-4, rotchm wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 4:57:04 PM UTC-4, kenseto wrote: > > > > [] > > > > > > > You are the one who is lying. You nym shifted from David DeHilster. > > > > You are a racist and clueless. The following link demonstrates my point: > > > > http://www.modelmechanics.org/dehilster.pdf > > This link does work, but it doesn't have ANY evidence connecting > rotchm with dehilster. You need to calm down, Mr. Seto. David deHilster was the only person who was handling the paper presentation at the NPA. He threatened me that he will not allow me to present my paper if I didn’t obey what he said about absolute time....I didn’t obey so he carried out his threat. I communicated with him for many years and he used and still use the gym shifted handle Rotchm. > > > > > > Saying it three times doesnt make it any more true. > > > And the link doesnt work. And who is this dehilster person? > > > > You are David deHilster and you are a liar. The link: http://www.modelmechanicns.org/dehilster > > works perfectly. > > > > Google begs to differ: > This site can’t be reached > www.modelmechanicns.org’s server IP address could not be found. > Search Google for model mechanics org de hilster > ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED > > It looks like you has stressed yourself to the point > that you cannot type correctly the link to your own > website. > > Time for you to unplug. go outside and enjoy some fresh air. > Clear your head, then maybe you can come back and complete > a simple calculation from your gravity equation. > > Enjoy, > ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 09:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e59cff06-aec5-4520-8238-5d053498c6d4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473347 |
On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 6:56:26 AM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > > Time for you to unplug. go outside and enjoy some fresh air. > > Clear your head, then maybe you can come back and complete > > a simple calculation from your gravity equation. > > Ken Shito You have been told many times that "rotchm" is Stephane Baune, a colleague crackpot of yours.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 13:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <239ca2e4-6abe-47c1-9ccd-6f42c69270c1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473347 |
On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 9:56:26 AM UTC-4, kenseto wrote: > David deHilster was the only person who was handling the paper > presentation at the NPA. He threatened me that he will not allow > me to present my paper if I didn’t obey what he said about absolute > time.... That is not true idiot ken, He (David) never told you that. *I* told you that. David is not me (rotchm). You blame everyone of your shortcomings. Keep it up and I will block you from posting on usenet like I did a while back.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 09:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <79938c75-dfa2-4384-9f8f-0b90049b3e06@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473298 |
On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 12:46:12 PM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > You are David deHilster and you are a liar. No, Ken Shito "rotchm" real name is Stephane Baune. A fellow crackpot of yours.Here is his NPA page: https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Stephane_Baune
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 13:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <77352800-0b18-476d-9eb4-05d8337f0a4e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473369 |
On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 12:43:35 PM UTC-4, Dono, wrote: > On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 12:46:12 PM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > > > You are David deHilster and you are a liar. > > No, Ken Shito > > "rotchm" real name is Stephane Baune. A fellow crackpot of yours.Here is his NPA page: > > https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Stephane_Baune Well, Im not david nor stephane (nor mike, nor selleri, nor joseph etc as you used to claim). But what can we expect from someone as you who cant even think out a simple physics/math problem. Remember, *you* failed every little problem I presented here, even basic algebra problems... And Google kept a record of it all. But if you think that you have bettered yourself, game to try another simple fun problem?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 14:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f6f800f2-5e2f-4945-8201-d944a6001b13@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473413 |
On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 1:51:44 PM UTC-7, rotchm wrote: > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 12:43:35 PM UTC-4, Dono, wrote: > > On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 12:46:12 PM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > > > > > You are David deHilster and you are a liar. > > > > No, Ken Shito > > > > "rotchm" real name is Stephane Baune. A fellow crackpot of yours.Here is his NPA page: > > > > https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Stephane_Baune > > Well, Im not david nor stephane Why are you so ashamed of yourself, Stephane? You used to boast about your physique: https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Stephane_Baune
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 14:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <df90b403-ddad-4ae8-97f4-817b5c04a7d3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473420 |
On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 5:30:08 PM UTC-4, Dono, wrote: > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 1:51:44 PM UTC-7, rotchm wrote: > > Well, Im not david nor stephane > > Why are you so ashamed of yourself, Stephane? You used to boast about your physique: I even told you who I really am. But you still couldnt figure it out. The more you are wrong, the better for me. And I still boast about my physique and brains, because I can. You, u have nothing to boast about because you have shown countless times here that u are clueless in math & physics. Even now, you shy away from another challenge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 14:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1c4d51d7-8bb9-40fa-9637-2f2d3fbc2657@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #473425 |
On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 2:41:31 PM UTC-7, rotchm wrote: > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 5:30:08 PM UTC-4, Dono, wrote: > > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 1:51:44 PM UTC-7, rotchm wrote: > > > > Well, Im not david nor stephane > > > > Why are you so ashamed of yourself, Stephane? You used to boast about your physique: > > I even told you who I really am. I know exactly who you are. I also know your "masterpieces"
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web