Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #467924 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-15 09:48 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-08-28 17:05 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 366 — 34 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-15 09:48 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-08-15 19:17 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-15 11:58 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-08-16 13:18 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-16 10:27 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-08-16 10:30 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-08-15 19:51 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-16 04:38 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-16 07:13 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-16 07:21 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-16 07:24 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-08-16 16:44 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-08-16 22:42 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-17 07:14 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-17 07:43 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-08-17 16:57 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-17 08:59 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-17 09:22 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-17 11:23 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-17 14:06 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-17 14:26 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-08-17 23:39 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Lovu Biftek <ufeli@fupuks.cl> - 2018-08-17 22:44 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-17 18:04 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-22 14:55 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Lovu Biftek <ufeli@fupuks.cl> - 2018-08-17 22:45 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-18 06:48 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Lovu Biftek <ufeli@fupuks.cl> - 2018-08-17 22:42 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-18 06:54 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-08-18 16:45 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-18 08:05 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Sushika Imaki <kukih@wkkss.ki> - 2018-08-18 17:52 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-18 12:46 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-08-19 00:32 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-08-17 19:08 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Lovu Biftek <ufeli@fupuks.cl> - 2018-08-17 19:07 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-17 08:04 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light egas@pacbell.net - 2018-08-17 09:20 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-22 14:44 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:53 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-22 15:07 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-22 23:40 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-28 00:35 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-08-15 12:14 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 20:55 +0000
Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-08-15 17:26 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 20:44 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 21:59 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 13:33 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-19 19:15 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-08-20 14:09 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-16 07:07 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-08-16 17:11 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-08-17 18:48 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-17 10:02 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-08-17 19:11 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-16 00:18 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-16 00:40 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-16 00:56 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-16 07:09 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-16 10:20 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-16 13:18 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-08-16 13:36 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-16 09:58 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-16 13:03 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Lovu Biftek <ufeli@fupuks.cl> - 2018-08-16 18:24 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-16 13:37 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-17 13:13 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-17 14:01 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2018-08-17 14:45 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-22 10:47 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 09:44 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-16 10:14 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-17 09:46 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-17 13:47 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-17 14:08 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-17 14:49 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-17 15:55 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-18 06:57 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-18 06:51 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-18 13:49 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-17 19:28 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-18 07:55 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-22 10:46 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 09:37 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 17:45 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 11:21 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 12:20 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-23 05:52 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-19 15:51 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-19 16:09 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-19 19:59 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-20 06:52 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-20 08:03 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-20 22:01 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-21 05:09 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 05:29 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-21 17:01 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-20 10:54 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-20 18:06 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-20 17:23 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-20 09:12 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-20 09:30 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-20 17:24 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-20 13:03 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-20 20:51 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-20 23:22 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-21 07:05 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-21 16:59 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-21 01:04 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-20 21:54 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 13:04 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-21 16:55 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-22 07:21 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:39 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-22 10:48 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 09:48 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 09:54 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 10:13 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-22 11:46 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-22 10:09 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 10:16 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-22 11:39 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 12:54 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 13:02 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 13:06 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 13:07 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 13:28 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 13:31 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 13:39 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 13:57 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:11 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 14:35 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 15:47 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-22 13:55 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 14:31 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-22 14:46 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-23 07:38 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-23 10:00 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-23 13:54 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-23 15:51 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-23 21:20 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-24 07:49 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 20:16 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 16:28 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 20:20 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-23 08:00 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 10:34 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-22 11:41 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 12:24 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-08-21 21:17 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-21 22:05 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-08-22 15:12 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-22 15:20 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-08-23 10:44 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-23 20:12 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-23 11:19 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 11:24 +0100
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-24 22:53 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-19 10:36 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-19 20:51 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-19 12:47 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-19 23:15 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-21 17:04 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-20 01:15 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-20 12:54 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-20 07:28 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-20 16:48 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-20 08:12 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-20 08:39 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-20 17:51 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-20 09:02 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-20 09:45 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-20 12:53 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-20 13:22 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 13:41 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-20 21:21 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-22 11:11 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 10:01 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-22 20:23 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-23 08:20 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-23 11:52 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-23 10:15 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-23 13:37 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-23 15:15 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-23 21:13 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-24 06:20 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Eters Beckenbauer <lrrif@dnewrersd.ne> - 2018-08-24 13:25 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-25 03:33 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-28 11:09 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-28 08:37 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-28 09:00 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-28 16:07 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-24 07:30 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-24 08:12 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-24 08:47 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-24 09:02 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-24 09:12 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-08-25 23:29 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 08:53 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-20 13:11 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-20 13:55 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-20 15:29 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-20 09:02 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-20 09:13 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-20 09:50 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-20 12:57 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-20 13:28 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-20 13:38 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-20 13:56 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-08-21 09:54 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-21 07:09 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-21 07:10 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-21 07:18 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-21 07:51 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-21 09:55 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-21 13:51 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 14:02 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-21 23:29 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 18:05 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 18:37 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2018-08-21 14:48 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 15:22 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 10:28 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 08:52 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-21 07:39 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2018-08-22 10:51 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 02:17 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-22 07:13 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-21 17:10 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-21 14:07 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-22 11:36 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 10:51 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-21 17:09 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-21 14:01 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-22 11:45 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-20 23:24 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-21 20:33 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-22 15:04 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 07:18 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-22 10:45 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-22 12:08 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-22 18:25 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-23 04:46 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 20:18 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-22 23:36 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 09:23 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-23 19:55 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-23 15:17 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-24 03:48 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-23 08:24 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-23 00:39 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 17:06 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-25 01:03 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 16:18 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-25 02:01 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 17:51 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 18:06 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-25 11:39 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-25 03:33 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-24 16:41 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-25 02:45 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-25 09:49 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-26 23:27 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-27 12:38 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-28 11:01 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-28 09:59 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 14:25 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-30 08:58 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 10:45 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-30 12:19 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 13:14 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-30 13:26 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 13:58 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-30 14:36 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 14:52 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-30 13:18 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-30 07:56 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-30 09:21 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-27 15:43 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-27 11:22 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Toloni D'antonio <uut@gwrroei.ta> - 2018-08-27 16:37 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 10:24 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 17:20 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 17:43 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 10:51 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 18:01 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-27 18:13 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 19:30 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-28 21:53 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light hallstoncliff@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 15:10 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-08-27 18:31 -0500
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light hallstoncliff@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 19:13 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 09:39 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-27 12:40 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Eters Beckenbauer <lrrif@dnewrersd.ne> - 2018-08-23 14:43 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-25 23:39 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-26 22:53 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-08-27 23:37 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-24 15:22 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-25 07:11 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-22 14:46 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> - 2018-08-23 07:50 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 08:50 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-23 13:34 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-23 13:37 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 14:25 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 15:29 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-24 06:10 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-08-25 23:24 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-08-25 23:37 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 06:40 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-08-26 08:48 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 15:53 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 15:57 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 16:12 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 16:25 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 16:45 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 17:50 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 01:24 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-24 02:04 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 08:16 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 17:14 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 18:36 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-24 17:04 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 11:41 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 18:54 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 12:32 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-27 23:08 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 13:11 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 13:13 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-28 00:47 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 20:28 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-28 00:59 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 01:37 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-28 21:51 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 13:05 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-28 23:46 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 16:12 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 16:41 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 17:00 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-29 17:51 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-29 10:46 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-29 20:04 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-29 11:22 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-29 20:42 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 13:06 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-29 22:10 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 15:35 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> - 2018-08-30 22:48 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-30 15:36 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light alsor@interia.pl - 2018-08-27 13:59 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-27 23:19 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 16:10 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-28 01:18 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 16:27 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-28 02:06 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 09:19 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 16:52 +0000
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 10:32 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-28 22:09 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 13:25 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 17:10 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-28 21:47 +0200
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 11:17 -0700
Re: Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 17:05 -0700
Page 1 of 19 [1] 2 3 … 19 Next page →
| From | Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-15 09:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light |
| Message-ID | <6fceaded-718d-4c9b-ba23-577dd41380ec@googlegroups.com> |
Hey guys, I'm baaaack. I just put a new paper on vixra.org. It is titled "Variable Time and the Variable Speed of Light." Here is the link: http://vixra.org/pdf/1607.0289v6.pdf And here is the opening paragraph: "The fact that the speed of light is variable is demonstrated almost every day. No matter where you measure the speed of light, if you measure it correctly, you will get a result of 299,792,458 meters per second. Does this mean that the speed of light is the same everywhere? No. It means the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere. And, according to Einstein’s Theories of Special and General Relativity, the length of a second can be different almost everywhere. That means that if you measure the speed of light to be 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in one location, and if you also measure it to be 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in another location, if the length of a second is different at those two locations, then the speed of light is also different." Since the facts in that paragraph are undeniable, I assume everyone here fully agrees with it. Nevertheless, I'd be interested in your thoughts. :-) Ed
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-15 19:17 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ftj5goFr4b3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #467924 |
Am 15.08.2018 um 18:48 schrieb Ed Lake: > Hey guys, I'm baaaack. > > I just put a new paper on vixra.org. It is titled "Variable Time and the > Variable Speed of Light." Here is the link: http://vixra.org/pdf/1607.0289v6.pdf > > And here is the opening paragraph: > > "The fact that the speed of light is variable is demonstrated almost every day. No matter where you measure the speed of light, if you measure it correctly, you will get a result of 299,792,458 meters per second. Does this mean that the speed of light is the same everywhere? No. It means the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere. And, according to Einstein’s Theories of Special and General Relativity, the length of a second can be different almost everywhere. That means that if you measure the speed of light to be 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in one location, and if you also measure it to be 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in another location, if the length of a second is different at those two locations, then the speed of light is also different." > > Since the facts in that paragraph are undeniable, I assume everyone here fully agrees with it. Nevertheless, I'd be interested in your thoughts. :-) Sure, there is circular reasoning in the definition of space and time. But that doesn't help that much, since with what shall we measure the length of a second if not with a clock? And for the creation of clocks we need to know the length of a second. Similar with distance: speed of light in vacuum is always constant, hence we can define the length of a meter by the fraction of a second and the speed of light in vacuum. But how fast is actually light, if you have no meter defined? TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-15 11:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <630f2bdc-7c12-45e0-9375-4b858a1fd6aa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467926 |
On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 12:17:15 PM UTC-5, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 15.08.2018 um 18:48 schrieb Ed Lake: > > Hey guys, I'm baaaack. > > > > I just put a new paper on vixra.org. It is titled "Variable Time and the > > Variable Speed of Light." Here is the link: http://vixra.org/pdf/1607.0289v6.pdf > > > > And here is the opening paragraph: > > > > "The fact that the speed of light is variable is demonstrated almost every day. No matter where you measure the speed of light, if you measure it correctly, you will get a result of 299,792,458 meters per second. Does this mean that the speed of light is the same everywhere? No. It means the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere. And, according to Einstein’s Theories of Special and General Relativity, the length of a second can be different almost everywhere. That means that if you measure the speed of light to be 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in one location, and if you also measure it to be 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in another location, if the length of a second is different at those two locations, then the speed of light is also different." > > > > Since the facts in that paragraph are undeniable, I assume everyone here fully agrees with it. Nevertheless, I'd be interested in your thoughts. :-) > > Sure, there is circular reasoning in the definition of space and time. The issue is time and the speed of light, not space and time. > > But that doesn't help that much, since with what shall we measure the > length of a second if not with a clock? And for the creation of clocks > we need to know the length of a second. The length of a second was arbitrarily determined. They arbitrarily divided the solar day into 24 hours, an hour into 60 minutes and minutes into 60 seconds. Then they built clocks to measure time that way. Later, as it it became more important to be able to compare measurements of time, they arbitrarily decided that one second is defined as “the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium-133 atom.” The point is: A second defined that way is longer when you are at the bottom of a mountain than when you are at the top, because atoms spin faster when they are farther away from a gravitational mass. > > Similar with distance: > > speed of light in vacuum is always constant, hence we can define the > length of a meter by the fraction of a second and the speed of light in > vacuum. > > But how fast is actually light, if you have no meter defined? They define a meter as 100 centimeters, but the whole scheme of measuring distances was arbitrarily defined, too. Again, the point is: Using the same definition of a meter and the same definition of a second, when you measure the speed of light at the top of a mountain it will be faster than the speed of light measured at the bottom of a mountain. That is because clocks tick faster at the top of the mountain and thus a second that consists of 9,192,631,770 "ticks" is shorter. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-16 13:18 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ftl4rnFa5q3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #467934 |
Am 15.08.2018 um 20:58 schrieb Ed Lake: > On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 12:17:15 PM UTC-5, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am 15.08.2018 um 18:48 schrieb Ed Lake: >>> Hey guys, I'm baaaack. >>> >>> I just put a new paper on vixra.org. It is titled "Variable Time and the >>> Variable Speed of Light." Here is the link: http://vixra.org/pdf/1607.0289v6.pdf >>> >>> And here is the opening paragraph: >>> >>> "The fact that the speed of light is variable is demonstrated almost every day. No matter where you measure the speed of light, if you measure it correctly, you will get a result of 299,792,458 meters per second. Does this mean that the speed of light is the same everywhere? No. It means the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere. And, according to Einstein’s Theories of Special and General Relativity, the length of a second can be different almost everywhere. That means that if you measure the speed of light to be 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in one location, and if you also measure it to be 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in another location, if the length of a second is different at those two locations, then the speed of light is also different." >>> >>> Since the facts in that paragraph are undeniable, I assume everyone here fully agrees with it. Nevertheless, I'd be interested in your thoughts. :-) >> >> Sure, there is circular reasoning in the definition of space and time. > > The issue is time and the speed of light, not space and time. Well, 'space' and 'length' are related concepts. You only need to multiply 'length' by three and order the axis in mutual perpendicular directions. >> >> But that doesn't help that much, since with what shall we measure the >> length of a second if not with a clock? And for the creation of clocks >> we need to know the length of a second. > > The length of a second was arbitrarily determined. They arbitrarily divided the solar day into 24 hours, an hour into 60 minutes and minutes into 60 seconds. Then they built clocks to measure time that way. Actually the length of a second was derived from the rotation of planet Earth. But that doesn't tell, how long a second is 'in real'. IOW we are not certain, whether or not other beings from other dimensions would regard a second as long or short and if their second would be similar to ours. > Later, as it it became more important to be able to compare measurements of time, they arbitrarily decided that one second is defined as “the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium-133 atom.” > > The point is: A second defined that way is longer when you are at the bottom of a mountain than when you are at the top, because atoms spin faster when they are farther away from a gravitational mass. > >> >> Similar with distance: >> >> speed of light in vacuum is always constant, hence we can define the >> length of a meter by the fraction of a second and the speed of light in >> vacuum. >> >> But how fast is actually light, if you have no meter defined? > > They define a meter as 100 centimeters, but the whole scheme of measuring distances was arbitrarily defined, too. Again, the point is: Using the same definition of a meter and the same definition of a second, when you measure the speed of light at the top of a mountain it will be faster than the speed of light measured at the bottom of a mountain. That is because clocks tick faster at the top of the mountain and thus a second that consists of 9,192,631,770 "ticks" is shorter. Length was first defined over the length of the Emperors foot. But with aging of the monarch or by loss of the foot, the system of measurement needed to be changed. So other means were considered and speed of light in vacuum was one possibility. But imho that system is not much better than the system with the Emperor's feet. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alsor@interia.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-16 10:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <738a35c3-a53c-4e8a-8997-82444067c3bc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467926 |
W dniu środa, 15 sierpnia 2018 19:17:15 UTC+2 użytkownik Thomas Heger napisał: > But how fast is actually light, if you have no meter defined? This is irrelevant - the base speed is arbitrarily always. But unfortunately: people prefer 'natural units' of measure - always!, thus the 'light speed' is automatically fixed, because these 'natural units' are varying in the same way like the nature itself varries; namely: the units of measure are varying perfectly in the same way, how the light speed varies, because the light speed determines these units.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-16 10:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66d286d9-868f-4777-833a-2ce60bee3bea@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468028 |
Eduardo Del Lago = TARD ((((c^7) / (hbar * (G^2))) * ((((1 kg) * G) / (c^2))^4)) / ((c * (4e-7 * pi))^2)) / (1 - (1 / 137.035999)) = 1.000013 m kg (((1 - (1 / 137.035999)) * m kg) / ((((c^7) / hbar) * (((1 kg) / (c^2))^4)) / ((c * (4e-7 * pi))^2)))^0.5 = 6.67403662 × 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2 ((((1 - (1 / 137.035999)) * m kg) / ((((c^7) / hbar) * (((1 kg) / (c^2))^4)) / ((c * (4e-7 * pi))^2)))^0.5) / G = 0.999993501
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-15 19:51 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pl1p77$1075$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #467924 |
Op 15-aug-2018 om 18:48 schreef Ed Lake: > Hey guys, I'm baaaack. > > I just put a new paper on vixra.org. It is titled "Variable Time and > the Variable Speed of Light." Here is the link: > http://vixra.org/pdf/1607.0289v6.pdf > > And here is the opening paragraph: > > "The fact that the speed of light is variable is demonstrated almost > every day. HAHAHAHAHA! > No matter where you measure the speed of light, if you > measure it correctly, you will get a result of 299,792,458 meters per > second. Does this mean that the speed of light is the same > everywhere? No. It means the speed of light PER SECOND is the same > everywhere. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > And, according to Einstein’s Theories of Special and > General Relativity, the length of a second can be different almost > everywhere. That means that if you measure the speed of light to be > 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in one location, and if you also > measure it to be 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in another location, > if the length of a second is different at those two locations, then > the speed of light is also different." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > > Since the facts in that paragraph are undeniable, I assume everyone > here fully agrees with it. Nevertheless, I'd be interested in your > thoughts. :-) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > > Ed > Here we go for another round of Lake bashing :-) Dirk Vdm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-16 04:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e2fd7720-cf49-4c43-b136-e7a06df58554@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467927 |
El miércoles, 15 de agosto de 2018, 14:51:39 (UTC-3), Dirk Van de moortel escribió: > Op 15-aug-2018 om 18:48 schreef Ed Lake: > > Hey guys, I'm baaaack. > > > > I just put a new paper on vixra.org. It is titled "Variable Time and > > the Variable Speed of Light." Here is the link: > > http://vixra.org/pdf/1607.0289v6.pdf > > > > And here is the opening paragraph: > > > > "The fact that the speed of light is variable is demonstrated almost > > every day. > > HAHAHAHAHA! > > > No matter where you measure the speed of light, if you > > measure it correctly, you will get a result of 299,792,458 meters per > > second. Does this mean that the speed of light is the same > > everywhere? No. It means the speed of light PER SECOND is the same > > everywhere. > > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > > > And, according to Einstein’s Theories of Special and > > General Relativity, the length of a second can be different almost > > everywhere. That means that if you measure the speed of light to be > > 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in one location, and if you also > > measure it to be 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in another location, > > if the length of a second is different at those two locations, then > > the speed of light is also different." > > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > > > > > Since the facts in that paragraph are undeniable, I assume everyone > > here fully agrees with it. Nevertheless, I'd be interested in your > > thoughts. :-) > > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > > > > > Ed > > > > Here we go for another round of Lake bashing :-) > > Dirk Vdm Lake writes this nonsense in his "paper": "The fact that the speed of light is variable is demonstrated almost every day. No matter where you measure the speed of light, if you measure it correctly, you will get a result of 299,792,458 meters per second. Does this mean that the speed of light is the same everywhere? No. It means the speed of light per second is the same everywhere. And, according to Einstein’s Theories of Special and General Relativity, the length of a second can be different almost everywhere. That means that if you measure the speed of light to be 299,792,458 meters per second in one location, and if you also measure it to be 299,792,458 meters per second in another location, if the length of a second is different at those two locations, then the speed of light is also different." Note "It means the ***speed of light per second*** is the same everywhere" Ha Ha Ha!!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-16 07:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8636176b-d6c6-42cd-8cd3-f5be15cf91f6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467986 |
On Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 6:38:19 AM UTC-5, Paparios wrote: > El miércoles, 15 de agosto de 2018, 14:51:39 (UTC-3), Dirk Van de moortel escribió: > > Op 15-aug-2018 om 18:48 schreef Ed Lake: > > > Hey guys, I'm baaaack. > > > > > > I just put a new paper on vixra.org. It is titled "Variable Time and > > > the Variable Speed of Light." Here is the link: > > > http://vixra.org/pdf/1607.0289v6.pdf > > > > > > And here is the opening paragraph: > > > > > > "The fact that the speed of light is variable is demonstrated almost > > > every day. > > > > HAHAHAHAHA! > > > > > No matter where you measure the speed of light, if you > > > measure it correctly, you will get a result of 299,792,458 meters per > > > second. Does this mean that the speed of light is the same > > > everywhere? No. It means the speed of light PER SECOND is the same > > > everywhere. > > > > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > > > > > And, according to Einstein’s Theories of Special and > > > General Relativity, the length of a second can be different almost > > > everywhere. That means that if you measure the speed of light to be > > > 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in one location, and if you also > > > measure it to be 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND in another location, > > > if the length of a second is different at those two locations, then > > > the speed of light is also different." > > > > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > > > > > > > > Since the facts in that paragraph are undeniable, I assume everyone > > > here fully agrees with it. Nevertheless, I'd be interested in your > > > thoughts. :-) > > > > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > > > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > > Here we go for another round of Lake bashing :-) > > > > Dirk Vdm > > Lake writes this nonsense in his "paper": > > "The fact that the speed of light is variable is demonstrated almost every day. > No matter where you measure the speed of light, if you measure it correctly, you > will get a result of 299,792,458 meters per second. Does this mean that the > speed of light is the same everywhere? No. It means the speed of light per > second is the same everywhere. And, according to Einstein’s Theories of Special > and General Relativity, the length of a second can be different almost > everywhere. That means that if you measure the speed of light to be 299,792,458 > meters per second in one location, and if you also measure it to be 299,792,458 > meters per second in another location, if the length of a second is different at > those two locations, then the speed of light is also different." > > Note "It means the ***speed of light per second*** is the same everywhere" > > Ha Ha Ha!!!! Can you provide an example of a location where the speed of light was MEASURED to be less than or greather than 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND? Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-16 07:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1e7f1139-6d15-4a1e-8584-eb3220ca6f3c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468000 |
El jueves, 16 de agosto de 2018, 11:13:54 (UTC-3), Ed Lake escribió: > On Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 6:38:19 AM UTC-5, Paparios wrote: > > > > Lake writes this nonsense in his "paper": > > > > "The fact that the speed of light is variable is demonstrated almost every day. > > No matter where you measure the speed of light, if you measure it correctly, you > > will get a result of 299,792,458 meters per second. Does this mean that the > > speed of light is the same everywhere? No. It means the speed of light per > > second is the same everywhere. And, according to Einstein’s Theories of Special > > and General Relativity, the length of a second can be different almost > > everywhere. That means that if you measure the speed of light to be 299,792,458 > > meters per second in one location, and if you also measure it to be 299,792,458 > > meters per second in another location, if the length of a second is different at > > those two locations, then the speed of light is also different." > > > > Note "It means the ***speed of light per second*** is the same everywhere" > > > > Ha Ha Ha!!!! > > Can you provide an example of a location where the speed of light was MEASURED to be less than or greather than 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND? > > Ed It was you who wrote ***speed of light per second***. Do you not realize how nonsensical that is?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-16 07:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cd4e8dea-ba17-4be3-820f-a96c5c2b2c0b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468001 |
On Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 9:21:58 AM UTC-5, Paparios wrote: > El jueves, 16 de agosto de 2018, 11:13:54 (UTC-3), Ed Lake escribió: > > On Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 6:38:19 AM UTC-5, Paparios wrote: > > > > > > > Lake writes this nonsense in his "paper": > > > > > > "The fact that the speed of light is variable is demonstrated almost every day. > > > No matter where you measure the speed of light, if you measure it correctly, you > > > will get a result of 299,792,458 meters per second. Does this mean that the > > > speed of light is the same everywhere? No. It means the speed of light per > > > second is the same everywhere. And, according to Einstein’s Theories of Special > > > and General Relativity, the length of a second can be different almost > > > everywhere. That means that if you measure the speed of light to be 299,792,458 > > > meters per second in one location, and if you also measure it to be 299,792,458 > > > meters per second in another location, if the length of a second is different at > > > those two locations, then the speed of light is also different." > > > > > > Note "It means the ***speed of light per second*** is the same everywhere" > > > > > > Ha Ha Ha!!!! > > > > Can you provide an example of a location where the speed of light was MEASURED to be less than or greather than 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND? > > > > Ed > > It was you who wrote ***speed of light per second***. Do you not realize how > nonsensical that is? Nope. Explain the problem to me. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-16 16:44 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pl42ko$efd$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #468002 |
Op 16-aug-2018 om 16:24 schreef Ed Lake: > On Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 9:21:58 AM UTC-5, Paparios wrote: >> El jueves, 16 de agosto de 2018, 11:13:54 (UTC-3), Ed Lake escribió: >>> On Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 6:38:19 AM UTC-5, Paparios wrote: >> >>>> >>>> Lake writes this nonsense in his "paper": >>>> >>>> "The fact that the speed of light is variable is demonstrated almost every day. >>>> No matter where you measure the speed of light, if you measure it correctly, you >>>> will get a result of 299,792,458 meters per second. Does this mean that the >>>> speed of light is the same everywhere? No. It means the speed of light per >>>> second is the same everywhere. And, according to Einstein’s Theories of Special >>>> and General Relativity, the length of a second can be different almost >>>> everywhere. That means that if you measure the speed of light to be 299,792,458 >>>> meters per second in one location, and if you also measure it to be 299,792,458 >>>> meters per second in another location, if the length of a second is different at >>>> those two locations, then the speed of light is also different." >>>> >>>> Note "It means the ***speed of light per second*** is the same everywhere" >>>> >>>> Ha Ha Ha!!!! >>> >>> Can you provide an example of a location where the speed of light was MEASURED to be less than or greather than 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND? >>> >>> Ed >> >> It was you who wrote ***speed of light per second***. Do you not realize how >> nonsensical that is? > > Nope. Explain the problem to me. I really hope that nobody will try to explain that. You would then go and make a little change to the "paper", and thus make it less obviously nonsensical for other ignorami who might read it. But I'm sure that *someone* will be daft enough to explain it :-| Dirk Vdm > > Ed >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-16 22:42 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ftm5tkFhq6bU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #468002 |
Am 16.08.2018 um 16:24 schrieb Ed Lake: ... >>>> Note "It means the ***speed of light per second*** is the same everywhere" >>>> >>>> Ha Ha Ha!!!! >>> >>> Can you provide an example of a location where the speed of light was MEASURED to be less than or greather than 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND? >>> >>> Ed >> >> It was you who wrote ***speed of light per second***. Do you not realize how >> nonsensical that is? > > Nope. Explain the problem to me. Well : v = ds /dt if you write 'speed per second' you have time twice below the line of the fraction. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-17 07:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f5e1a222-6b68-49c2-86bc-dd362b28d0c7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468071 |
On Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 3:42:31 PM UTC-5, Thomas Heger wrote: > Am 16.08.2018 um 16:24 schrieb Ed Lake: > ... > >>>> Note "It means the ***speed of light per second*** is the same everywhere" > >>>> > >>>> Ha Ha Ha!!!! > >>> > >>> Can you provide an example of a location where the speed of light was MEASURED to be less than or greather than 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND? > >>> > >>> Ed > >> > >> It was you who wrote ***speed of light per second***. Do you not realize how > >> nonsensical that is? > > > > Nope. Explain the problem to me. > > Well : > > v = ds /dt > > if you write 'speed per second' you have time twice below the line of > the fraction. > > > TH So, you're saying I should have written "velocity of light per second" instead of "speed of light per second" because that is the only way mathematicians can understand it? "Speed" is defined as: "the rate at which someone or something is able to move or operate." "Velocity" is defined as: "the speed of something in a given direction." I wrote "the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere." If I look up the SPEED of light, the answer I get is that the SPEED of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND. If I look up the VELOCITY of light, the answer I get is that the SPEED of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND. Is it only mathematicians who cannot understand that "the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere"? Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-17 07:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <00732213-255a-4f49-b216-142e714646c6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468126 |
El viernes, 17 de agosto de 2018, 11:14:43 (UTC-3), Ed Lake escribió: > > So, you're saying I should have written "velocity of light per second" instead of "speed of light per second" because that is the only way mathematicians can understand it? > > "Speed" is defined as: "the rate at which someone or something is able to move or operate." > > "Velocity" is defined as: "the speed of something in a given direction." > > I wrote "the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere." > > If I look up the SPEED of light, the answer I get is that the SPEED of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND. > > If I look up the VELOCITY of light, the answer I get is that the SPEED of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND. > > Is it only mathematicians who cannot understand that "the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere"? > > Ed Edward: 1) Speed of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND!!! 2) Your "speed of light per second" is read by any normal person as 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND per second. Don't you realized how dumb that is? 3) Because of this your so called "paper" is wrong!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@notmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-17 16:57 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pl6no4$nrl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #468128 |
Op 17-aug-2018 om 16:43 schreef Paparios: > El viernes, 17 de agosto de 2018, 11:14:43 (UTC-3), Ed Lake escribió: > >> >> So, you're saying I should have written "velocity of light per second" instead of "speed of light per second" because that is the only way mathematicians can understand it? >> >> "Speed" is defined as: "the rate at which someone or something is able to move or operate." >> >> "Velocity" is defined as: "the speed of something in a given direction." >> >> I wrote "the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere." >> >> If I look up the SPEED of light, the answer I get is that the SPEED of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND. >> >> If I look up the VELOCITY of light, the answer I get is that the SPEED of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND. >> >> Is it only mathematicians who cannot understand that "the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere"? >> >> Ed > > Edward: > > 1) Speed of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND!!! > 2) Your "speed of light per second" is read by any normal person as > 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND per second. Don't you realized how dumb > that is? > 3) Because of this your so called "paper" is wrong! > You are spoiling the fun :-( Dirk Vdm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-17 08:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6ff30bfc-4aea-4347-92c5-711b6649ea72@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468131 |
El viernes, 17 de agosto de 2018, 11:57:11 (UTC-3), Dirk Van de moortel escribió: > Op 17-aug-2018 om 16:43 schreef Paparios: > > El viernes, 17 de agosto de 2018, 11:14:43 (UTC-3), Ed Lake escribió: > > > >> > >> So, you're saying I should have written "velocity of light per second" instead of "speed of light per second" because that is the only way mathematicians can understand it? > >> > >> "Speed" is defined as: "the rate at which someone or something is able to move or operate." > >> > >> "Velocity" is defined as: "the speed of something in a given direction." > >> > >> I wrote "the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere." > >> > >> If I look up the SPEED of light, the answer I get is that the SPEED of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND. > >> > >> If I look up the VELOCITY of light, the answer I get is that the SPEED of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND. > >> > >> Is it only mathematicians who cannot understand that "the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere"? > >> > >> Ed > > > > Edward: > > > > 1) Speed of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND!!! > > 2) Your "speed of light per second" is read by any normal person as > > 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND per second. Don't you realized how dumb > > that is? > > 3) Because of this your so called "paper" is wrong! > > > > You are spoiling the fun :-( > > Dirk Vdm But, as you can see, he will not understand a bit of this....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-17 09:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e17b96c6-8f30-429d-adad-7067881475a7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468140 |
On Friday, August 17, 2018 at 10:59:03 AM UTC-5, Paparios wrote: > El viernes, 17 de agosto de 2018, 11:57:11 (UTC-3), Dirk Van de moortel escribió: > > Op 17-aug-2018 om 16:43 schreef Paparios: > > > El viernes, 17 de agosto de 2018, 11:14:43 (UTC-3), Ed Lake escribió: > > > > > >> > > >> So, you're saying I should have written "velocity of light per second" instead of "speed of light per second" because that is the only way mathematicians can understand it? > > >> > > >> "Speed" is defined as: "the rate at which someone or something is able to move or operate." > > >> > > >> "Velocity" is defined as: "the speed of something in a given direction." > > >> > > >> I wrote "the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere." > > >> > > >> If I look up the SPEED of light, the answer I get is that the SPEED of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND. > > >> > > >> If I look up the VELOCITY of light, the answer I get is that the SPEED of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND. > > >> > > >> Is it only mathematicians who cannot understand that "the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere"? > > >> > > >> Ed > > > > > > Edward: > > > > > > 1) Speed of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND!!! > > > 2) Your "speed of light per second" is read by any normal person as > > > 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND per second. Don't you realized how dumb > > > that is? > > > 3) Because of this your so called "paper" is wrong! > > > > > > > You are spoiling the fun :-( > > > > Dirk Vdm > > But, as you can see, he will not understand a bit of this.... What I'm seeing, Paparios, is that you appear to understand nothing but mathematics, and you therefore cannot explain anything except mathematics. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-17 11:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f7732f6c-4a60-4e68-904f-8b966660508b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468143 |
El viernes, 17 de agosto de 2018, 13:22:46 (UTC-3), Ed Lake escribió: > On Friday, August 17, 2018 at 10:59:03 AM UTC-5, Paparios wrote: > > > > Edward: > > > > > > > > 1) Speed of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND!!! > > > > 2) Your "speed of light per second" is read by any normal person as > > > > 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND per second. Don't you realized how dumb > > > > that is? > > > > 3) Because of this your so called "paper" is wrong! > > > > > > > > > > You are spoiling the fun :-( > > > > > > Dirk Vdm > > > > But, as you can see, he will not understand a bit of this.... > > What I'm seeing, Paparios, is that you appear to understand nothing but mathematics, and you therefore cannot explain anything except mathematics. > > Ed What we are seeing is that you DO NOT KNOW or UNDERSTAND any of math or physics. You wrote, again and again, at the begining of your "paper" the following text: ..."No. It means the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere." The speed of light has units meters/second, right? When you, again and again, write "speed of light PER SECOND" you are expressing something that has units meters/second/PER SECOND, that is meters/second^2 (which are the units of acceleration). This is a childist mistake of yours, and worse one that you apparently can't see....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ed Lake <detect@newsguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-17 14:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <74a48565-f968-4199-9821-16750120b404@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #468161 |
On Friday, August 17, 2018 at 1:23:24 PM UTC-5, Paparios wrote: > El viernes, 17 de agosto de 2018, 13:22:46 (UTC-3), Ed Lake escribió: > > On Friday, August 17, 2018 at 10:59:03 AM UTC-5, Paparios wrote: > > > > > > Edward: > > > > > > > > > > 1) Speed of light is 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND!!! > > > > > 2) Your "speed of light per second" is read by any normal person as > > > > > 299,792,458 meters PER SECOND per second. Don't you realized how dumb > > > > > that is? > > > > > 3) Because of this your so called "paper" is wrong! > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are spoiling the fun :-( > > > > > > > > Dirk Vdm > > > > > > But, as you can see, he will not understand a bit of this.... > > > > What I'm seeing, Paparios, is that you appear to understand nothing but mathematics, and you therefore cannot explain anything except mathematics. > > > > Ed > > What we are seeing is that you DO NOT KNOW or UNDERSTAND any of math or physics. > > You wrote, again and again, at the begining of your "paper" the following text: > > ..."No. It means the speed of light PER SECOND is the same everywhere." > > The speed of light has units meters/second, right? > > When you, again and again, write "speed of light PER SECOND" you are > expressing something that has units meters/second/PER SECOND, that is meters/second^2 (which are the units of acceleration). > > This is a childist mistake of yours, and worse one that you apparently > can't see.... Why did you cut out all the links to places that say the same thing I say? Is it because you cannot admit it is a childish mistake of YOURS due to the fact that you cannot understand English? Here are the links again: "The speed of light in vacuum, commonly denoted c, is a universal physical constant important in many areas of physics. Its exact value is 299,792,458 metres PER SECOND (approximately 300,000 km/s (186,000 mi/s)." Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light "The speed of light in a vacuum is 186,282 miles PER SECOND (299,792 kilometers PER SECOND), and in theory nothing can travel faster than light." Source: https://www.space.com/15830-light-speed.html "The speed of light in a vacuum is 299,792,458 metres PER SECOND, a figure scientists finally agreed on in 1975." Source: https://www.sciencealert.com/why-is-the-speed-of-light-the-speed-of-light Why don't you contact those sources (and thousands more) to tell them they are wrong? Do you believe they are also wrong? Then how can you suggest it is only me? Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 19 [1] 2 3 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web