Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #466103 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-29 05:33 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-08-30 06:34 -0700 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 27 participants
Thread has 1050 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1050 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 05:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-29 23:12 +1000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-29 17:09 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 19:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-07-30 13:17 +1000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-30 13:32 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 05:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 13:27 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-07-30 07:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 12:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 21:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 15:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 22:27 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 16:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 00:26 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 21:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 12:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 10:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 19:04 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 01:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 02:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 21:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 09:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 11:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 21:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 16:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 00:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 17:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 01:29 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 21:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 21:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 09:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 13:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 21:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-30 18:29 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-07-31 15:09 +1000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-31 22:34 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-30 04:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-07-29 22:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 22:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-30 05:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 04:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 05:06 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 21:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-07-31 05:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 10:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-07-31 11:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 01:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 19:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 03:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-01 03:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 21:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 09:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 11:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 21:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 17:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 09:28 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 21:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 09:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 11:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-01 20:15 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 13:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 16:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 17:02 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 15:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-03 00:59 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 03:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 12:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 23:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 16:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 04:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-03 04:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 09:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-03 10:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 14:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-03 23:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 16:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-03 19:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 20:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-03 21:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 21:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 05:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-04 14:29 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 05:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 06:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 07:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 09:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 10:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-04 11:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 12:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 13:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 14:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 15:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 22:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 04:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-05 04:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Tson Ylor <uo@srsysts.sd> - 2018-08-05 12:04 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 06:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 06:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-06 00:28 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 15:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 15:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 15:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 19:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-06 08:56 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 05:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-07 11:11 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-07 04:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 06:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 05:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-07 19:00 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 11:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 15:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 15:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 15:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 18:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 20:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 20:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 21:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 22:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 05:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 05:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 07:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 09:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 16:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 09:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 17:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 10:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 18:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 10:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 11:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 18:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 11:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Owen Scharff <nehh@fenohw.hp> - 2018-08-06 18:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 12:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 12:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 14:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 14:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 14:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 21:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 06:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 07:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 11:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Owen Scharff <nehh@fenohw.ho> - 2018-08-06 11:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 06:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 06:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 14:11 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 08:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:26 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 08:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 01:49 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 16:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-06 18:55 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 17:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 05:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 23:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 14:07 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 08:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 16:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 16:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 12:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 19:56 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 13:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 21:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 14:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 21:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 21:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 22:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-07 04:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 06:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 13:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 09:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 17:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-07 10:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 17:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-07 11:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 12:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 12:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 21:25 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 23:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 14:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 08:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 16:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 10:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 17:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 12:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 20:56 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-08 14:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 17:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-09 03:15 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 19:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-08 19:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 20:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-09 04:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 08:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-09 05:11 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 20:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-09 05:14 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 20:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-09 04:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-09 06:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 08:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 16:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 10:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 17:53 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 13:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 21:49 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 14:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 22:47 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 16:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-10 17:19 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-10 09:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 16:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-10 15:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 10:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 09:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 16:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 10:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 18:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 14:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-10 14:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-10 16:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 16:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 22:15 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 23:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 16:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-11 01:58 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 19:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-11 14:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-11 14:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-11 22:35 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-11 15:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-11 15:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-11 16:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-12 00:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-12 03:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-12 04:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Lovu Biftek <ufeli@fupuks.cl> - 2018-08-12 11:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-12 07:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-11 22:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-12 00:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-12 12:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-12 21:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-13 03:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-13 04:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-13 04:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-13 05:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 13:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-13 09:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-13 11:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-13 11:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-13 13:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-12 18:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-12 19:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-08-12 19:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 00:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 13:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 08:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 15:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 12:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 20:31 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-15 07:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-15 02:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 06:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 14:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-15 07:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 14:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 08:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 09:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 11:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 12:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 18:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 12:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 20:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-15 14:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 16:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-15 17:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 19:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-15 19:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 22:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-16 04:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 06:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 06:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 15:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-16 20:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 20:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-17 03:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 04:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-17 05:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-17 06:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 16:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-17 18:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 20:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-17 21:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 16:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 16:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-17 18:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 20:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-17 21:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-17 21:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 04:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-18 05:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-18 06:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 07:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-18 08:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-18 09:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 12:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-18 15:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 22:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-19 06:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 07:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-18 23:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 00:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 19:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 02:49 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 22:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 13:47 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 09:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 17:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-16 11:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 12:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 20:49 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 16:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 23:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 19:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 11:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 16:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 17:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 12:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 19:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 13:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 13:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-19 06:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Icano Bologna <ob@woccgn.cc> - 2018-08-19 15:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-19 09:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Icano Bologna <ob@woccgn.cc> - 2018-08-19 16:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 07:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-19 07:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-19 07:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Icano Bologna <ob@woccgn.cc> - 2018-08-19 15:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-18 13:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-19 08:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-19 02:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 04:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-19 18:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-19 11:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-19 23:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-20 16:40 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 10:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-20 19:27 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 13:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-20 13:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 13:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 11:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-20 17:04 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 11:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-20 21:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 17:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 17:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-20 21:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-20 22:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 13:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 08:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 17:08 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 12:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 20:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 23:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-18 12:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-19 04:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 05:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 13:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 07:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-19 15:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 16:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-19 16:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 21:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 23:40 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-20 03:34 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-19 19:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 23:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 14:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-20 08:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-20 15:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-19 18:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 14:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-19 15:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-20 08:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 09:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 11:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-20 19:47 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 13:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 21:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 13:04 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 08:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 16:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 13:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-21 14:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 21:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-21 23:47 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 18:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 18:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 02:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 23:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 12:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 06:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 09:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 15:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 02:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 19:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-22 14:45 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 07:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-21 10:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 14:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-21 14:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 18:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-21 20:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 23:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 21:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 21:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 13:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 08:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 16:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 09:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 13:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-21 14:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 18:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-22 14:40 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 07:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 08:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-23 13:54 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 07:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-24 00:34 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-25 12:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-27 14:57 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 21:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 18:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 02:29 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 23:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 12:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 07:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:53 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 08:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 21:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 10:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 16:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-25 15:11 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 05:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 07:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:53 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 10:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 16:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 21:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 22:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 10:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 10:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-23 11:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-22 17:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 10:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 12:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-22 21:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 16:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 16:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 19:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 13:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 23:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 12:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 05:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 07:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 23:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-22 14:47 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 05:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 09:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 17:08 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 12:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 13:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 20:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 14:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-20 21:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-20 12:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 10:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 11:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 13:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 13:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 14:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 17:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 18:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 19:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-20 21:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 21:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 00:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 19:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 13:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 08:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 16:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 21:00 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 14:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 21:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 06:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 14:28 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-16 08:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 09:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 18:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-16 11:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 12:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 20:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-17 04:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-15 19:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 22:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 06:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-15 16:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 11:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 19:26 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-15 13:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 13:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 08:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 15:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 12:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 20:31 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-14 00:17 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 18:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 02:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 00:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-14 12:10 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 08:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-15 01:51 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 17:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-15 11:53 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 06:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-15 16:02 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 08:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-16 00:13 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 16:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-16 08:08 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 06:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-17 00:46 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 16:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-15 16:41 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-15 07:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-14 12:12 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 18:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 02:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 00:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-09 12:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 13:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-09 17:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 20:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-09 21:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-09 23:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-10 04:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 22:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-10 18:32 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-10 12:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 14:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-10 01:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-10 08:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 14:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-09 03:10 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 18:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-08 20:21 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 13:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-08 20:18 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 12:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 00:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 18:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 02:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-09 03:13 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 18:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-07 15:29 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 09:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-07 17:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 12:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-07 21:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 23:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-08 15:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 09:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-08 18:19 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 13:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-08 21:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 18:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-08 21:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-09 03:09 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 18:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-08 21:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-07 09:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-07 02:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 19:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-07 03:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 20:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 00:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 15:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 09:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 17:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 10:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 19:07 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 12:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 20:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 14:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 21:57 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-05 01:06 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 16:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 22:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 22:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 21:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 21:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 09:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-03 14:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 09:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-03 17:25 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-03 23:11 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 16:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 16:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 22:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 20:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 16:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 00:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 17:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 01:29 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 22:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 10:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 03:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 11:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 04:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 09:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 16:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 10:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 12:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 22:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 16:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 03:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 10:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 10:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-03 18:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 11:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-03 20:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 22:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 16:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 17:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 16:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 17:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 15:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 00:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 10:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 17:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 11:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 15:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 00:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 03:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 13:59 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 07:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 10:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 17:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 22:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 22:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 12:56 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-04 07:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 15:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-04 09:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 18:56 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-05 13:14 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-05 04:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-05 13:51 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-05 05:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 23:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 23:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-04 03:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 09:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 17:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 23:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 17:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 12:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 22:27 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 15:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 16:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 21:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 12:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-01 22:08 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 13:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-01 22:26 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 13:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-01 22:37 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 21:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 21:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 21:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 09:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 03:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 10:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 08:18 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 21:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 17:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 01:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 22:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 10:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 03:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 11:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 04:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 09:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-03 00:54 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 03:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 21:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-01 04:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 12:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-01 14:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 16:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-01 18:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 22:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-02 05:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 05:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-02 06:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 09:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-02 11:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 15:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-03 00:56 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 03:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-31 22:06 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 22:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-30 05:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-07-30 12:24 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 04:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 04:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity paulcardinale0@gmail.com - 2018-07-30 11:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 13:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity paulcardinale0@gmail.com - 2018-07-31 12:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 07:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 14:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 15:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 05:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 13:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 13:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 00:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 18:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 01:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 19:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 03:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 22:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 12:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-27 05:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 06:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-27 09:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 10:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 12:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-27 19:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 14:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 22:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 20:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 19:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 12:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 19:32 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 16:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 02:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-27 14:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 20:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 02:28 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 20:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Oberto Badelli <eual@dillbwoe.ih> - 2018-08-27 15:15 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 06:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 15:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 14:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 11:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 06:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 14:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 08:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 15:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Oberto Badelli <eual@dillbwoe.ih> - 2018-08-27 15:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 15:59 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Oberto Badelli <eual@dillbwoe.ih> - 2018-08-27 16:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 11:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 19:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 19:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-27 19:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 16:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 03:00 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 20:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 21:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 06:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 00:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 12:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 06:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 15:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 08:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 16:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 12:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 21:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 16:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 17:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 13:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 21:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 16:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 05:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 14:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 08:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 16:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 10:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 12:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 12:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 14:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 14:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 15:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 15:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 15:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 19:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 13:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 14:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 22:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 15:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 22:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 13:10 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 15:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 15:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 17:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 18:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 19:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 20:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 21:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 21:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 23:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-30 04:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 00:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-30 04:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-30 15:19 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-30 14:57 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 08:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 16:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 09:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 11:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 05:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 14:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 11:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 19:26 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 12:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 14:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 17:29 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 13:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 06:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 14:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 22:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 20:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 02:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 21:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 05:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 23:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 11:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-28 05:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 13:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-28 06:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 14:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-28 10:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 16:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 23:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 23:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 12:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 12:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-28 13:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 16:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-28 17:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 18:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-28 18:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 18:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-28 19:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 23:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 03:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 05:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 06:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 10:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 10:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 13:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 06:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 15:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 09:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 17:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 17:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-30 11:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 12:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 21:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 15:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 01:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 18:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 01:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 19:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-30 11:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 12:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 21:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 15:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 01:02 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 18:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 01:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 19:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 11:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-30 21:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-30 09:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-30 16:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 09:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-30 16:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 17:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-30 19:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 20:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-31 04:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-30 21:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 23:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-29 17:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-29 15:35 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 19:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 14:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 22:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 13:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 07:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 07:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-30 15:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-30 08:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 10:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 17:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 12:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 21:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 15:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 21:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-29 17:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 12:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 13:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-30 06:34 -0700
Page 31 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 29 30 [31] 32 33 … 50 Next page →
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-10 01:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bc6f0268-cb1c-41b8-b00e-4609c9a55d66@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467480 |
On Friday, 10 August 2018 06:37:17 UTC+2, Michael Moroney wrote: > Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> writes: > > >You are getting to be as much of a philosopher as Odd Bodkin. I can still > >show algebra to you though. OK, here is what we will do. Since all of > >these philosophers say I am wrong, all you have to do is show the error. > >We will take the example of a GPS satellite. > > ... > > >Now you say that you and Odd Bodkin and all of these philosophers you > >quoted have found a mistake in the foregoing explanation. So now go > >ahead and explain the error you have found. > > Well, yeah, as I already told you several times, YOU APPLIED THE GALILEAN > TRANSFORM TO THE GPS SATELLITE SYSTEM! That is your error. The GPS system > was EXPLICITLY based on the general relativity A lie, as expected from a brainwashed fanatic idiot. The GPS system is based on common sense and that's why its clocks indicate t'=t, against moronic prophecies of your moronic Shit. It's not GT, though - GPS model assumes absolute movement too. time transforms, which are > approximately the combination of the Lorentz transform (from the satellite > velocity in orbit) and a gravitational well transform.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-10 15:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pkk9c8$gsb$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #467477 |
Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 5:35:38 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: >> On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 2:16:29 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: >>> >>> On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 12:36:26 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 9:47:51 AM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: >>>>> >>>>> So do you believe that people who do not believe in a length contraction >>>>> can be saved? >>>> >>>> As James wrote, belief has NOTHING to do with anything. >>>> >>>>> Well, if saying that the time of a clock in a GPS satellite is n' is not >>>>> a lie, I just have no idea what you are saying is a lie. Perhaps you >>>>> would care to elaborate. >>>> >>>> I realize that you are terrifically dense, so I won't be offended at your >>>> resistance to the truth: Your assertion that "the time of a clock in a >>>> GPS satellite is n' is the reason we called you a liar" is a lie in and >>>> of itself. This is just ONE of the examples of your dishonesty. Here's >>>> another one: >>>> >>>>> So do you believe that people who do not believe in a length contraction >>>>> can be saved? >>>> >>>> This is deflection from the point (i.e., why you are a liar), which is >>>> dishonest. As for what God is going to think about you and LC, >>>> undoubtedly, that will not even be mentioned. Your tendency to >>>> dissemble, however, WILL. >>> >>> So if God is on your side, you cannot fail, right? >> >> God doesn't "come on your side." YOU come on HIS. >> >>> I told you why I believe that the Galilean transformation equations are >>> the correct equations. Not a peep about what I said from you. >> >> Another lie. >> >>> Now you are claiming that God will prove that you are right. >> >> And another lie! >> >>> What about discussing some of these things now? Surely if you have >>> such truth in your possession, you want to share it with others. >> >> Been there, done that. >> >> “Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want >> to hear.” -- Paulo Coelho >> >> “We are only as blind as we want to be.” – Maya Angelou >> >> “To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like >> administering medicine to the dead.” – Thomas Paine >> >> “we think everything in this universe has to conform to our paradigm >> of what makes sense. Do you have any idea how arrogant that view >> is and on how little of this universe we base it?” ― Robert Buettner >> >> “Opinion is really the lowest form of human knowledge. It requires >> no accountability, no understanding.” – Bill Bullard >> >> “It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how >> smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.” >> -- Richard P. Feynman >> >> “The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the >> easiest person to fool.” -- Richard P. Feynman >> >> “Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn.” >> -- Benjamin Franklin >> >> "By denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox." >> -- Galileo Galilei >> >> “A man sees in the world what he carries in his heart.” – Goethe >> >> “I never learned from a man that agreed with me.” – Robert A. Heinlein >> >> “Denial is the worst kind of lie … because it is the lie you tell >> yourself.” – Michelle A. Homme >> >> “People love answers, but only as long as they are the ones who came up >> with them.” ― Criss Jami >> >> “Relativity and quantum mechanics were not invented because someone >> thought it would be a good idea for the universe to obey these rules; >> rather, these revolutionary ideas were forced upon us by nature.” >> -- Lawrence M. Krauss >> >> "I try to be skeptical of everything (I don't believe there's any >> other way to learn about how the world really works)." >> -- Lawrence M. Krauss >> >> “How much better would life be if a liar’s pants really did catch fire? >> -- Rebel Circus >> >> “Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.” – Friedrich Schiller >> >> “It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.” – Voltaire >> >> “Ninety-nine percent of the people in the world are fools and the >> rest of us are in great danger of contagion.” – Thornton Wilder > > You are getting to be as much of a philosopher as Odd Bodkin. I can > still show algebra to you though. OK, here is what we will do. Since > all of these philosophers say I am wrong, all you have to do is show the > error. We will take the example of a GPS satellite. A GPS satellite is > orbiting earth at an altitude of about 12,000 miles. We add another 2000 > miles to that for the radius of the earth, and we have the radius of the > orbit. The velocity of a GPS satellite is about 14,000 km/hr. Now we > know scientists will want to use kilometers and miles interchangeably > because they are both distances, the way they do GPS satellite seconds > and earth clock seconds, but we will convert kilometers to miles anyway. > So 14,000 km/hr would be about 6,700 miles per hour. So the > circumference of an orbit of the satellite is 87,920 miles. So then all > we have to do is divide 87,920 by 6,700, and we have the time it takes > for the satellite to make an orbit, 13.12 hrs. > > But scientists tell us that the clock in the satellite is faster than the > clock on earth we used for these calculations, so a clock in the > satellite is going to show more time than 13.12 hours for one orbit of > the satellite. That means that according to the time of the clock in the > satellite, the velocity of the satellite is going to be less than 6,700 miles per hour. > > > Then scientists say they adjust the rate of the clock in the satellite so > that it agrees with the clock on the ground. > > > So what I would do is say that the time of the clock in the satellite > before it is adjusted is n', the time of the clock in the satellite after > it is adjusted is t', and the time of the clock on earth is t. > Consequently, t'=t, which is exactly what the Galilean transformation > equations say t' is. > > > Now you say that you and Odd Bodkin and all of these philosophers you > quoted have found a mistake in the foregoing explanation. So now go > ahead and explain the error you have found. > It’s really quite simple. The mistake is that the different speeds arise from neither the Galilean transforms nor the Lorentz transforms. The Lorentz transforms would say that you using the same orbital circumference for both reference frames is wrong. The Galilean transforms would say that you using two different orbital periods for both reference frames is wrong. The Winn transformations apparently say use different orbital periods because observational evidence tells you to, but use the same orbital circumference because you wish to ignore the observational evidence about length contraction. The result is you get two different orbital speeds in the two frames. Which is a problem you somehow think belongs to physicists. -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-10 08:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9902b956-a593-45fd-9769-f1d75a0e5b4c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467509 |
On Friday, 10 August 2018 17:01:31 UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote: > The Galilean transforms would say that you using two different orbital > periods for both reference frames is wrong. No, poor idiot. GT wouldn't say about right or wrong. You're imagining, as usual. > > The Winn transformations apparently say use different orbital periods > because observational evidence tells you to, but use the same orbital > circumference because you wish to ignore the observational evidence about > length contraction. We always should remember that in modern physics Jargon "observational" means calculated from ingenious Shit of ingenious Great Guru.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-10 10:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <58acf03c-ae2d-4031-9799-7fe961de6808@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467509 |
On Friday, August 10, 2018 at 8:01:31 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > Now you say that you and Odd Bodkin and all of these philosophers you > > quoted have found a mistake in the foregoing explanation. So now go > > ahead and explain the error you have found. > > > > It’s really quite simple. The mistake is that the different speeds arise > from neither the Galilean transforms nor the Lorentz transforms. > > The Lorentz transforms would say that you using the same orbital > circumference for both reference frames is wrong. > > The Galilean transforms would say that you using two different orbital > periods for both reference frames is wrong. > > The Winn transformations apparently say use different orbital periods > because observational evidence tells you to, but use the same orbital > circumference because you wish to ignore the observational evidence about > length contraction. The result is you get two different orbital speeds in > the two frames. Which is a problem you somehow think belongs to physicists. > So using two different circumferences is right, but using the times that clocks actually show is wrong. So go ahead and explain why using two different circumferences is right. How do you get the two different circumferences? My own personal experience with this is that in order to change the circumference, you would either have to change the radius or 3.14159.... In the Navy I worked on radar, so that is how I would think about it. The altitude of a GPS satellite is not going to change whether you measure it from the earth or from the satellite, so you are saying that the value of 3.14159.... changes or else maybe the value of 2 changes. Go ahead and explain how you get two different circumferences. I can explain how I get two different clock readings. They are what the clocks actually show.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-09 14:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b86f4602-0a49-44eb-ae8f-3c567d150277@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467442 |
On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 12:36:26 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 9:47:51 AM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > > > On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 4:40:59 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > > On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 9:14:55 PM UTC-6, Python wrote: > > > > > > > > Robert Winn wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Well, there most certainly is a God. > > > > > > > > Well, just for curiosity, how can you back up such a claim? > > > > > > Some of the evidence I've collected: > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/evidence-for-the-existence-of-god > > > > > > However, believing in God is not sufficient to guarantee you a seat by > > > the side of Father Abraham: > > > > > > "Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also > > > believe, and tremble." -- James 2:19 > > > > So do you believe that people who do not believe in a length contraction > > can be saved? > > As James wrote, belief has NOTHING to do with anything. > > > > > Well, you are claiming that I am a liar because I called the time of a > > > > clock in a GPS satellite n'. I do not really think that makes me a > > > > liar. > > > > > Of course not, but that isn't why you are a liar. And your assertion > > > that it IS why -- is a lie. > > > > Well, if saying that the time of a clock in a GPS satellite is n' is not > > a lie, I just have no idea what you are saying is a lie. Perhaps you > > would care to elaborate. > > I realize that you are terrifically dense, so I won't be offended at your > resistance to the truth: Your assertion that "the time of a clock in a > GPS satellite is n' is the reason we called you a liar" is a lie in and > of itself. This is just ONE of the examples of your dishonesty. Here's > another one: > > > So do you believe that people who do not believe in a length contraction > > can be saved? > > This is deflection from the point (i.e., why you are a liar), which is > dishonest. As for what God is going to think about you and LC, undoubtedly, > that will not even be mentioned. Your tendency to dissemble, however, WILL. If what I believe about the length contraction is not important to God, why is it so important to you? I have invited you several times to go interact with other scientists who will be more sympathetic to your beliefs about a length contraction. No, you want to be in this discussion about the Galilean transformation equations calling me names.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@python.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-09 03:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <5b6b9488$0$14307$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #467307 |
Disgusting liar Robert Winn wrote: > On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 9:38:16 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 7:48:23 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 2:25:11 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 10:03:24 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 6:45:40 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 4:13:45 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 6, 2018 at 11:10:38 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 6, 2018 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 6, 2018 at 4:34:17 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, it DOES mean that the clock that's slow in S' is just as slow >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in S. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, thank you, Gary. The Galilean transformation equations show the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same reality from both frames of reference. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, it shows that the GT does not describe reality. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that's why Winn is not a scientist and is irrelevant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never said I was a scientist. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is clearly obvious that you are not only not a scientist, but that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are neither logical nor honest. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I said I was a welder with a high school education. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So shut up and weld. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That does not mean I cannot do a simple algebra problem. My opinion >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that the people who are doing the algebra problem wrong are the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones who are irrelevant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your opinion is worthless because you are ignorant, illogical and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dishonest. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You seem a little upset. Perhaps there are some of these nice scientists >>>>>>>>>>>>> who could comfort you by talking to you about the length contraction. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No one here is blathering about LC ... except YOU. And LC happens not >>>>>>>>>>>> because of actual "shrinkage" of a moving body, but because of non- >>>>>>>>>>>> simultaneity, which is also responsible for time dilation. So your >>>>>>>>>>>> sorry attempt to explain TD with broken clocks is refuted by your own >>>>>>>>>>>> words. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, you seem to be at odds with Lorentz and Einstein. They both said >>>>>>>>>>> that the length contraction was an actual contraction in length. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don’t believe they used those words at all. I’m curious what you think is >>>>>>>>>> entailed by an “actual contraction in length”. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In any event, if you want to discuss non-simultaneity, I can >>>>>>>>>>> prove that wrong also. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Using experimental data or with algebra? A reminder that you can’t prove >>>>>>>>>> anything in physics with algebra. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well, of course, if you reject algebra, you can do whatever you want to >>>>>>>>> do because then there is no reference for physics. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That’s simply not true, Robert. The reference for physics is, and has been >>>>>>>> for centuries, experimental observational data. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And in fact NONE of the conclusions you mention below were settled with >>>>>>>> algebra. Instead they were settled by experimental tests that showed >>>>>>>> inconsistency with Aristotelian ideas and consistency with the successor >>>>>>>> ideas. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don’t know where you ever got the idea that Galileo or Newton or Maxwell >>>>>>>> or Einstein established the truth of anything with algebra. It is simply >>>>>>>> not correct, and you should rethink your erroneous presupposition about >>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So you can say, Aristotle was right, a heavier object falls faster than a >>>>>>>>> lighter one, the earth is flat, lead can be turned into gold, the sun is >>>>>>>>> going around the earth, the orbits of the planets are epicycles, and >>>>>>>>> there is a length contraction. Who can dispute it? >>>>>>>>> If algebra is not allowed, whatever you say is already proven because you >>>>>>>>> do not allow algebra. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Algebra is certainly ALLOWED. It just doesn’t prove anything in physics. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your playing around with algebra also proves nothing and disproves nothing >>>>>>>> in physics, for that very reason. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I understand what you have said, that you are not really interested in >>>>>>>> physics, and that you want to play with equations. You are certainly >>>>>>>> allowed to do that. Waste your time any way that suits you, as its your >>>>>>>> time to waste. But you aren’t proving or disproving anything by that waste >>>>>>>> of your time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So go ahead and believe whatever you want to believe. I am still going >>>>>>>>> to use algebra. The Galilean transformation equations are algebra. Were >>>>>>>>> you aware that the Galilean transformation equations do not have a length >>>>>>>>> contraction? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, you are certainly free to express your algebraless ideas, but I >>>>>>> would point out that scientists like Galileo and Newton would always >>>>>>> express their ideas mathematically. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why of course they did, Newton quite a bit more than Galileo. After all, >>>>>> algebra is allowed. But it doesn’t prove anything, and Galileo and Newton >>>>>> didn’t prove anything true with algebra. >>>>>> >>>>> Well, OK, algebra means nothing to you. I had suspected that all along. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> No, algebra is quite useful. It is terrific for developing consequences of >>>> ideas. It just doesn’t prove anything in physics. >>>> >>>> I just don’t understand your notion that if it can’t be used for proof in >>>> physics then it is useless. >>> >>> This may surprise you, but I think it can be used for proof in physics. >> >> I’m not surprised you think so. It’s wrong, but I’m not surprised that >> you’re wrong about it. >> >>> What about calculus? Can calculus be used for proof in physics? >> >> Nope. Mathematics does not provide proof in physics. > > Oh, OK, then I will stop saying anything mathematical to you. I am sorry. I did not know you were such a sensitive person. >> >>> Maybe we should get rid of all mathematics. >> >> No, it’s very useful, just not for proof. I see no reason to throw away a >> good tool just because it isn’t good for what you want it to do. I wouldn’t >> throw away a chisel just because I can’t use it to drive nails. Why would >> you? >> > You are wrong. I have actually used a chisel to drive a nail one time. I didn't have a hammer but I had a chisel. Also, I used to make chipping hammers out of chisels by welding a handle on. Well, that may be a little too mathematical for you. I am sorry about being so insensitive. You've been through this story a few years ago, as it ended out your were lying. Too bad you forgot it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-08 18:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <adc7b8f8-8a67-47dc-8152-007449f43e56@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467361 |
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 6:10:34 PM UTC-7, Python wrote: > >> > > You are wrong. I have actually used a chisel to drive a nail one time. I didn't have a hammer but I had a chisel. Also, I used to make chipping hammers out of chisels by welding a handle on. Well, that may be a little too mathematical for you. I am sorry about being so insensitive. > > You've been through this story a few years ago, as it ended out your > were lying. Too bad you forgot it. Yes, I am going to have to work on the insensitivity I show at times.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-08 20:21 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e3586772-8083-9bd5-90c0-40b9aabce572@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #467302 |
Odd Bodkin wrote: > Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >> What about calculus? Can calculus be used for proof in physics? > > Nope. Mathematics does not provide proof in physics. > >> Maybe we should get rid of all mathematics. > > No, it’s very useful, just not for proof. Utter nonsense. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-08 13:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e72cf620-3123-45bc-9b5f-fd6ea6e1b76d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467316 |
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 11:21:17 AM UTC-7, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Odd Bodkin wrote: > > Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What about calculus? Can calculus be used for proof in physics? > > > > Nope. Mathematics does not provide proof in physics. > > > >> Maybe we should get rid of all mathematics. > > > > No, it’s very useful, just not for proof. > > Utter nonsense. > Well, I think Odd Bodkin may have a point. If junior high algebra is too difficult for scientists, maybe they should just use the equations they learned in school.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-08 20:18 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <3073c663-170b-0fe3-a9f3-51c3e28e34f5@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #467294 |
Odd Bodkin wrote: > No, algebra is quite useful. It is terrific for developing consequences of > ideas. It just doesn’t prove anything in physics. Wrong, uneducated guess, and hasty generalization. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-08 12:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d68d4f40-ba61-427f-b593-b673cd7f6af3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467314 |
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 11:18:34 AM UTC-7, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Odd Bodkin wrote: > > No, algebra is quite useful. It is terrific for developing consequences of > > ideas. It just doesn’t prove anything in physics. > > Wrong, uneducated guess, and hasty generalization. > Your statement might be a little too mathematical for Odd Bodkin. He is very sensitive about things like that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-09 00:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pkg0h5$1aa5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #467332 |
Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 11:18:34 AM UTC-7, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> No, algebra is quite useful. It is terrific for developing consequences of >>> ideas. It just doesn’t prove anything in physics. >> >> Wrong, uneducated guess, and hasty generalization. >> > Your statement might be a little too mathematical for Odd Bodkin. He is > very sensitive about things like that. > Sensitive in what way? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-08 18:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <75fb3d7a-8a41-40f4-9946-6918ce53aed8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467356 |
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 5:06:03 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 11:18:34 AM UTC-7, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > >> Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> No, algebra is quite useful. It is terrific for developing consequences of > >>> ideas. It just doesn’t prove anything in physics. > >> > >> Wrong, uneducated guess, and hasty generalization. > >> > > Your statement might be a little too mathematical for Odd Bodkin. He is > > very sensitive about things like that. > > > > Sensitive in what way? > Well, I do not know much about sensitivity. I just know it when I see it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-09 02:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pkg97o$1mep$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #467365 |
Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 5:06:03 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 11:18:34 AM UTC-7, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>> No, algebra is quite useful. It is terrific for developing consequences of >>>>> ideas. It just doesn’t prove anything in physics. >>>> >>>> Wrong, uneducated guess, and hasty generalization. >>>> >>> Your statement might be a little too mathematical for Odd Bodkin. He is >>> very sensitive about things like that. >>> >> >> Sensitive in what way? >> > Well, I do not know much about sensitivity. I just know it when I see it. > Or not. :) -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@python.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-09 03:13 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <5b6b951c$0$14307$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #467332 |
Nutty silly Robert Winn wrote: > On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 11:18:34 AM UTC-7, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> No, algebra is quite useful. It is terrific for developing consequences of >>> ideas. It just doesn’t prove anything in physics. >> >> Wrong, uneducated guess, and hasty generalization. >> > Your statement might be a little too mathematical for Odd Bodkin. He is very sensitive about things like that. He's not, not at all. YOU are very sensitive about length contraction and Thorazine. YOU are very sensitive about being called a nut or a Idiot Jesuit too. Sorry Mr Winn, you ARE a nut, and an idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-08 18:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <59a1e618-4b7c-44fc-8f78-9cdb81eddac3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467362 |
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 6:13:01 PM UTC-7, Python wrote: > Nutty silly Robert Winn wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 11:18:34 AM UTC-7, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > >> Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> No, algebra is quite useful. It is terrific for developing consequences of > >>> ideas. It just doesn’t prove anything in physics. > >> > >> Wrong, uneducated guess, and hasty generalization. > >> > > Your statement might be a little too mathematical for Odd Bodkin. He is very sensitive about things like that. > > He's not, not at all. YOU are very sensitive about length contraction > and Thorazine. YOU are very sensitive about being called a nut or > a Idiot Jesuit too. Yes, that is certainly all very true. I think you have hit the nail on the head. Were you using a hammer or a chisel. Odd Bodkin says it is very important what you use to drive a nail. > > Sorry Mr Winn, you ARE a nut, and an idiot. Well, see, that did not bother me much that time. Maybe I am getting over being sensitive.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-07 15:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pkcds5$5sf$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #467202 |
Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> writes: <snip> You still need to show which of the 1000 clocks that all show different time rates (fast, slow, backwards) can be the n' clock and show time dilation using the Galilean Transform. (Hint: Get busy and invent the Winn transform between t' and one of the clocks!) They all can't be n', since the Galilean transform predicts only a single value for t' with its t'=t. And why the one you chose. Otherwise, all you have is 1000 demonstrations of the t'=t portion of the Galilean Transform. Get busy! >> > You won't find any in this discussion, though. The Galilean >> > transformation equations do not have a length contraction. >> >> Everyone knows that, so this is just more of your regurgitation. And >> your assertions are due to ignorance, illogical thinking and dishonesty. >No, you cannot prove the Galilean transformation equations wrong. They >are the correct equations for relativity. The Galilean transform has already been proven wrong for relativistic speed differences. It works just fine as an approximation for daily life and its low-speed objects encountered (cars, airplanes, bullets, baseballs etc.). You'll never have to encounter it, unless they hire you to weld a tube for a particle accelerator at a major local university or something.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-07 09:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c4372a1c-e1be-446c-9510-cbfa92a07fc6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467211 |
On Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 8:29:11 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote: > Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> writes: > > <snip> > > You still need to show which of the 1000 clocks that all show different > time rates (fast, slow, backwards) can be the n' clock and show time > dilation using the Galilean Transform. (Hint: Get busy and invent the Winn > transform between t' and one of the clocks!) They all can't be n', since > the Galilean transform predicts only a single value for t' with its t'=t. > And why the one you chose. Otherwise, all you have is 1000 demonstrations > of the t'=t portion of the Galilean Transform. Get busy! > > >> > You won't find any in this discussion, though. The Galilean > >> > transformation equations do not have a length contraction. > >> > >> Everyone knows that, so this is just more of your regurgitation. And > >> your assertions are due to ignorance, illogical thinking and dishonesty. > > >No, you cannot prove the Galilean transformation equations wrong. They > >are the correct equations for relativity. > > The Galilean transform has already been proven wrong for relativistic > speed differences. > > It works just fine as an approximation for daily life and its low-speed > objects encountered (cars, airplanes, bullets, baseballs etc.). You'll > never have to encounter it, unless they hire you to weld a tube for a > particle accelerator at a major local university or something. Yes, I know how difficult this must seem. What you do with 1000 different clocks is you use a different letter for time in each set of Galilean transformation equations. But, you say, there are only 26 letters in the alphabet, and four are already used. What you do then is go to the Greek alphabet, then you can use Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Arabic, etc. You can find 1000 different letters for 1000 different times if you put your mind to it. I know it is difficult. But life is difficult. You thought of the 1000 different clocks. It is up to you to assign letters for the time variable for each clock.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-07 17:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pkckj2$457$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #467215 |
Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> writes: >On Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 8:29:11 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote: >> You still need to show which of the 1000 clocks that all show different >> time rates (fast, slow, backwards) can be the n' clock and show time >> dilation using the Galilean Transform. (Hint: Get busy and invent the Winn >> transform between t' and one of the clocks!) They all can't be n', since >> the Galilean transform predicts only a single value for t' with its t'=t. >> And why the one you chose. Otherwise, all you have is 1000 demonstrations >> of the t'=t portion of the Galilean Transform. Get busy! >> >No, you cannot prove the Galilean transformation equations wrong. They >> >are the correct equations for relativity. >> The Galilean transform has already been proven wrong for relativistic >> speed differences. >> It works just fine as an approximation for daily life and its low-speed >> objects encountered (cars, airplanes, bullets, baseballs etc.). You'll >> never have to encounter it, unless they hire you to weld a tube for a >> particle accelerator at a major local university or something. >Yes, I know how difficult this must seem. What you do with 1000 different >clocks is you use a different letter for time in each set of Galilean >transformation equations. But, you say, there are only 26 letters in the >alphabet, and four are already used. What you do then is go to the Greek >alphabet, then you can use Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Arabic, >etc. That's not what I meant and you know it. You claimed to have proven time dilation without length contraction by using the Galilean transform, then inserting a broken clock n' because you misinterpreted Einstein, then the Galilean transform again, to get a time dilated n clock in the original frame. I am simply asking, if there are 1000 broken clocks, which of those 1000 clocks do we use, and why. Call it whatever you want, but you seem to be stuck on n/n' for some reason. But you have to give a valid reason why you chose the clock you chose, because each of those 1000 clocks will give a *different* value of time dilation. They cannot all be right! A proper transform will give ONE value for each of x', y', z', t' given parameters such as v and the transform target x, y, z, t. Both the Galilean and Lorentz transforms do that. If there is a connection between the original t/t' clock and the chosen broken clock (the missing Winn transform) then you MAY have a point. Without that, all you have is 1000 demonstrations of the Galilean transform, and zero proof of your time dilation using the Galilean transform.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-07 12:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0277ecfe-a31d-4d87-aac8-f2574d48c2d4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #467232 |
On Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 10:23:49 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >On Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 8:29:11 AM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >> You still need to show which of the 1000 clocks that all show different
> >> time rates (fast, slow, backwards) can be the n' clock and show time
> >> dilation using the Galilean Transform. (Hint: Get busy and invent the Winn
> >> transform between t' and one of the clocks!) They all can't be n', since
> >> the Galilean transform predicts only a single value for t' with its t'=t.
> >> And why the one you chose. Otherwise, all you have is 1000 demonstrations
> >> of the t'=t portion of the Galilean Transform. Get busy!
>
> >> >No, you cannot prove the Galilean transformation equations wrong. They
> >> >are the correct equations for relativity.
>
> >> The Galilean transform has already been proven wrong for relativistic
> >> speed differences.
>
> >> It works just fine as an approximation for daily life and its low-speed
> >> objects encountered (cars, airplanes, bullets, baseballs etc.). You'll
> >> never have to encounter it, unless they hire you to weld a tube for a
> >> particle accelerator at a major local university or something.
>
> >Yes, I know how difficult this must seem. What you do with 1000 different
> >clocks is you use a different letter for time in each set of Galilean
> >transformation equations. But, you say, there are only 26 letters in the
> >alphabet, and four are already used. What you do then is go to the Greek
> >alphabet, then you can use Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Arabic,
> >etc.
>
> That's not what I meant and you know it. You claimed to have proven time
> dilation without length contraction by using the Galilean transform, then
> inserting a broken clock n' because you misinterpreted Einstein, then the
> Galilean transform again, to get a time dilated n clock in the original
> frame. I am simply asking, if there are 1000 broken clocks, which of
> those 1000 clocks do we use, and why. Call it whatever you want, but you
> seem to be stuck on n/n' for some reason. But you have to give a valid
> reason why you chose the clock you chose, because each of those 1000
> clocks will give a *different* value of time dilation. They cannot all be
> right! A proper transform will give ONE value for each of x', y', z', t'
> given parameters such as v and the transform target x, y, z, t.
> Both the Galilean and Lorentz transforms do that.
Well, each clock is right in terms of its own rate. In other words, in describing motion, the hands of each clock will have their own unique positions or digital display for any specific position of the frames of reference.
>
> If there is a connection between the original t/t' clock and the chosen
> broken clock (the missing Winn transform) then you MAY have a point.
> Without that, all you have is 1000 demonstrations of the Galilean
> transform, and zero proof of your time dilation using the Galilean
> transform.
Well, what we were originally discussing here in sci.physics.relativity were clocks that scientists called ideal clocks that agreed with ideal clocks in frame of reference S, but were found by scientists to have different rates during experiments because of different conditions of motion, gravitation, etc. In order to choose one specific clock, you have to choose one specific experiment because scientists report experiments where ideal clocks in S' are slower, ideal clocks in S' are faster, etc.
Whether a clock is slower or faster, its time can be shown as a variable in a set of Galilean transformation equations.
x = x' - v'n'
y = y'
z = z'
n = n'
n' is the time of the clock with a different rate.
For years I was imitating Einstein by saying x=ct and x'=cn'. That is how I arrived at these equations in the first place. But what I see as more significant now is the actual rates of ideal clocks obtained by experiment. According to scientists, the speed of light always measures c=186,000 miles per second according to the time of any clock that scientists designate as ideal. So, obviously, if there is a relationship which takes t' and results in n', I do not yet have that equation because it would have to describe all clocks that scientists call ideal. If you take x=ct and x' = cn' you always get a slower clock. So perhaps faster clocks have something to do with gravitation, which would result from equations for gravitation rather than from Galileo's equations, which only describe motion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 31 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 29 30 [31] 32 33 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web