Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #466103 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-29 05:33 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-08-30 06:34 -0700 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 27 participants
Thread has 1050 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1050 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 05:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-07-29 23:12 +1000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-29 17:09 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 19:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-07-30 13:17 +1000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-30 13:32 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 05:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 13:27 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-07-30 07:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 12:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 21:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 15:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 22:27 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 16:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 00:26 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 21:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 12:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 10:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 19:04 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 01:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 02:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 21:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 09:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 11:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 21:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 16:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 00:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 17:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 01:29 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 21:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 21:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 09:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 13:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 21:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-30 18:29 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-07-31 15:09 +1000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-31 22:34 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-30 04:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-07-29 22:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 22:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-30 05:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 04:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 05:06 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 21:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-07-31 05:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 10:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-07-31 11:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 01:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 19:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 03:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-01 03:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 21:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 09:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 11:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 21:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 17:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 09:28 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 21:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 09:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 11:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-01 20:15 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 13:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 16:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 17:02 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 15:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-03 00:59 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 03:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 12:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 23:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 16:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 04:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-03 04:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 09:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-03 10:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 14:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-03 23:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 16:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-03 19:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 20:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-03 21:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 21:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 05:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-04 14:29 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 05:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 06:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 07:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 09:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 10:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-04 11:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 12:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 13:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 14:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 15:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 22:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 04:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-05 04:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Tson Ylor <uo@srsysts.sd> - 2018-08-05 12:04 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 06:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 06:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-06 00:28 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 15:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 15:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 15:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 19:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-06 08:56 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 05:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-07 11:11 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-07 04:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 06:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 05:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-07 19:00 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 11:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 15:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 15:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 15:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 18:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 20:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 20:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-05 21:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 22:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 05:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 05:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 07:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 09:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 16:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 09:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 17:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 10:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 18:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 10:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 11:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 18:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 11:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Owen Scharff <nehh@fenohw.hp> - 2018-08-06 18:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 12:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 12:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 14:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 14:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 14:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 21:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 06:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 07:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 11:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Owen Scharff <nehh@fenohw.ho> - 2018-08-06 11:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 06:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 06:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 14:11 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 08:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:26 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 08:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 01:49 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 16:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-06 18:55 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 17:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 05:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 23:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 14:07 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 08:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 16:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 16:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 12:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 19:56 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 13:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 21:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 14:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-06 21:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-06 21:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 22:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-07 04:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 06:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 13:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 09:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 17:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-07 10:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 17:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-07 11:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 12:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 12:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 21:25 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 23:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 14:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 08:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 16:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 10:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 17:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 12:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 20:56 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-08 14:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 17:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-09 03:15 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 19:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-08 19:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 20:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-09 04:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 08:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-09 05:11 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 20:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-09 05:14 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 20:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-09 04:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-09 06:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 08:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 16:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 10:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 17:53 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 13:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 21:49 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 14:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 22:47 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 16:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-10 17:19 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-10 09:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 16:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-10 15:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 10:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 09:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 16:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 10:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 18:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 14:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-10 14:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-10 16:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 16:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 22:15 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 23:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 16:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-11 01:58 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 19:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-11 14:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-11 14:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-11 22:35 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-11 15:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-11 15:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-11 16:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-12 00:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-12 03:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-12 04:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Lovu Biftek <ufeli@fupuks.cl> - 2018-08-12 11:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-12 07:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-11 22:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-12 00:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-12 12:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-12 21:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-13 03:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-13 04:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-13 04:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-13 05:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 13:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-13 09:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-13 11:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-13 11:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-13 13:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-12 18:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-12 19:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-08-12 19:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 00:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 13:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 08:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 15:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 12:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 20:31 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-15 07:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-15 02:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 06:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 14:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-15 07:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 14:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 08:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 09:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 11:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 12:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 18:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 12:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 20:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-15 14:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 16:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-15 17:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 19:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-15 19:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 22:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-16 04:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 06:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 06:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 15:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-16 20:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 20:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-17 03:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 04:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-17 05:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-17 06:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 16:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-17 18:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 20:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-17 21:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 16:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 16:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-17 18:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 20:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-17 21:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-17 21:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 04:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-18 05:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-18 06:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 07:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-18 08:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-18 09:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 12:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-18 15:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 22:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-19 06:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 07:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-18 23:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 00:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 19:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 02:49 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 22:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 13:47 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 09:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 17:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-16 11:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 12:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 20:49 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 16:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 23:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 19:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 11:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 16:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 17:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 12:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 19:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 13:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 13:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-19 06:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Icano Bologna <ob@woccgn.cc> - 2018-08-19 15:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-19 09:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Icano Bologna <ob@woccgn.cc> - 2018-08-19 16:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 07:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-19 07:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-19 07:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Icano Bologna <ob@woccgn.cc> - 2018-08-19 15:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-18 13:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-19 08:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-19 02:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 04:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-19 18:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-19 11:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-19 23:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-20 16:40 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 10:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-20 19:27 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 13:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-20 13:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 13:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 11:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-20 17:04 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 11:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-20 21:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 17:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 17:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-20 21:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-20 22:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 13:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 08:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 17:08 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 12:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 20:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 23:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-18 12:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-19 04:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 05:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 13:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 07:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:44 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:17 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-19 15:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 16:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-19 16:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 21:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 23:40 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-20 03:34 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-19 19:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 23:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 14:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-20 08:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Jed Sosebee <eue@eosgps.pn> - 2018-08-20 15:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-19 18:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 22:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 14:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-19 15:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-19 15:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-08-20 08:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 09:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 11:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-20 19:47 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 13:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 21:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 13:04 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 08:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 16:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 13:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-21 14:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 21:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-21 23:47 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 18:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 18:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 02:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 23:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 12:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 06:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 09:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 15:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 02:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 19:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-22 14:45 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 07:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-21 10:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 14:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-21 14:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 18:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-21 20:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 23:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 21:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 21:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 13:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 08:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 16:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 09:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 13:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-21 14:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 18:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-22 14:40 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 07:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 08:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-23 13:54 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 07:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-24 00:34 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-25 12:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-27 14:57 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 21:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 18:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 02:29 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 23:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 12:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 07:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:53 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 08:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 21:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 10:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 16:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-25 15:11 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 05:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 07:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:53 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 10:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 16:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 21:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 22:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 10:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 10:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-23 11:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-22 17:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 10:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 12:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-22 21:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 16:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 16:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 19:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 13:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 23:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 12:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 05:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 07:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 23:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-22 14:47 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-22 05:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 09:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 17:08 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-21 12:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 13:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 20:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 14:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-20 21:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-20 12:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 10:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 11:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 13:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 13:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 14:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 17:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 18:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 19:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-20 21:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 21:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 16:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 00:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 19:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 13:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 08:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 16:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 21:00 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 14:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-20 21:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 06:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 14:28 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-16 08:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 09:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 18:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-16 11:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 12:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 20:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-17 04:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-15 19:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 22:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 06:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-15 16:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 11:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 19:26 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-15 13:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 13:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 08:08 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 15:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 12:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 20:31 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-14 00:17 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 18:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 02:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 00:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-14 12:10 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 08:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-15 01:51 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 17:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-15 11:53 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 06:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-15 16:02 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 08:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-16 00:13 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 16:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-16 08:08 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 06:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-17 00:46 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-16 16:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-15 16:41 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-15 07:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-14 12:12 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-13 18:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 02:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 00:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-09 12:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 13:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-09 17:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 20:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-09 21:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-09 23:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-10 04:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 22:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-10 18:32 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-10 12:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 14:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-10 01:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 15:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-10 08:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 14:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-09 03:10 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 18:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-08 20:21 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 13:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-08 20:18 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 12:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 00:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 18:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-09 02:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-09 03:13 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 18:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-07 15:29 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 09:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-07 17:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 12:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-07 21:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-07 23:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-08 15:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 09:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-08 18:19 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 13:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-08 21:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 18:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-08 21:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-09 03:09 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-08 18:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-08 21:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-07 09:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 15:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-07 02:18 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 19:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-07 03:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 20:47 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-06 00:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 15:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 09:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 17:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 10:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 19:07 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 12:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 20:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 14:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 21:57 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-05 01:06 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-04 16:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 22:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 22:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 21:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 21:19 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 09:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-03 14:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 09:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-03 17:25 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-03 23:11 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 16:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 16:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 22:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 20:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 16:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 00:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 17:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 01:29 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 22:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 10:34 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 03:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 11:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 04:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 09:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 16:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 10:23 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 12:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 22:48 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 16:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 03:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 10:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 10:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-03 18:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 11:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-03 20:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 22:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 16:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 17:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 16:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 17:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 15:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 00:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 10:22 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 17:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 11:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 15:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 00:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 03:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 13:59 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 07:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:22 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 10:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 17:54 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 11:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 22:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-03 22:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 12:56 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-04 07:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 15:09 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-04 09:05 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 18:56 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-05 13:14 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-05 04:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-05 13:51 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-05 05:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 23:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 23:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-04 03:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 09:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 17:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 15:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 23:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 17:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 12:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-02 22:27 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 15:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 16:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 21:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 12:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-01 22:08 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 13:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-01 22:26 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 13:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-01 22:37 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 21:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 21:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 21:24 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 09:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 03:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 10:39 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 08:18 +0100
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 21:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 17:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 01:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 22:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 10:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 03:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 11:01 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 04:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 09:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-03 00:54 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 03:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-01 21:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-01 04:07 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 12:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-01 14:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 16:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-01 18:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 22:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-02 05:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-02 05:15 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-02 06:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 09:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-02 11:01 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 15:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-08-03 00:56 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 03:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-31 22:06 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 22:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-07-30 05:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-07-30 12:24 +0200
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 04:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 04:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity paulcardinale0@gmail.com - 2018-07-30 11:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 13:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity paulcardinale0@gmail.com - 2018-07-31 12:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 07:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 14:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-08-23 15:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 05:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 13:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 13:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 00:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 18:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 01:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 19:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 03:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 22:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 12:37 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-27 05:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 06:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-27 09:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 10:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 12:06 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-27 19:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 14:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 22:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 20:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 19:42 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 12:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 19:32 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 16:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 02:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-27 14:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 20:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 02:28 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 20:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Oberto Badelli <eual@dillbwoe.ih> - 2018-08-27 15:15 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 06:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 15:14 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 14:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 11:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 06:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 14:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 08:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 15:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Oberto Badelli <eual@dillbwoe.ih> - 2018-08-27 15:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 15:59 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Oberto Badelli <eual@dillbwoe.ih> - 2018-08-27 16:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 11:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 19:21 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-27 19:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-27 19:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 16:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 03:00 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 20:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 21:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 06:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 00:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 12:05 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 06:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 15:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 08:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 16:52 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 12:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 21:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 16:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 17:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 13:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 21:36 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 16:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 05:00 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 14:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 08:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 16:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 10:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 12:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 12:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 14:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 14:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 15:04 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 15:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 15:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 19:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 13:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 14:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 22:13 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 15:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 22:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 13:10 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 15:18 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 15:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 17:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 18:31 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 19:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 20:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 21:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 21:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 23:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-30 04:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 00:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-30 04:25 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-30 15:19 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-30 14:57 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 08:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 16:24 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 09:50 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:40 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativityzwwwz mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 11:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 05:59 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 14:55 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 11:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:17 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 19:26 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 12:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 14:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 17:29 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 13:02 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 06:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 14:48 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 22:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 20:44 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 02:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 21:11 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 05:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 23:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 11:38 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-28 05:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 13:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-28 06:43 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 14:41 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-28 10:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 16:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-27 23:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 23:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-28 16:30 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 12:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 12:41 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-28 13:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 16:42 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-28 17:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 18:10 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-28 18:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 18:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-28 19:16 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 23:21 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 03:33 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 05:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 06:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 10:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-29 10:46 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:58 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 13:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 06:45 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 15:33 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 09:55 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 17:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 17:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-30 11:30 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 12:27 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 21:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 15:54 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 01:03 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 18:34 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 01:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 19:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-30 11:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 12:26 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 21:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 15:53 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 01:02 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 18:32 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 01:45 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 19:35 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 11:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-30 21:12 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-30 09:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-30 16:12 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 09:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-30 16:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 17:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-30 19:49 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 20:20 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-31 04:03 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-30 21:14 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 23:28 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-29 17:46 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-29 15:35 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 10:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:43 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 11:36 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 19:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 14:56 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 22:58 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 17:13 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 13:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 07:38 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 07:39 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-30 15:16 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-08-30 08:57 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 10:37 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 17:51 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 12:29 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 21:23 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 15:52 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-29 21:51 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Brandi Hofmann <ohifu@awdwf.nr> - 2018-08-29 17:50 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2018-08-29 12:09 -0700
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 13:20 +0000
Re: Newton and Galilean Relativity mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-08-30 06:34 -0700
Page 5 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 50 Next page →
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 14:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <811fab49-ea0b-4dcb-b273-70f8ee372d00@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466746 |
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 10:08:28 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
>
> > > Refuted by experimental evidence. Also, this contradicts one of the
> > > basic postulates of the GT and the LT (when the ship moves away from
> > > the dock at v, an observer on the ship sees the dock moving away at -v).
> >
> > Well, but this idea is easily disproven because if we take a slower clock
>
> Why would anyone with a brain do such a stupid thing?
>
Well, I did it to determine what actually happens in experiments that have slower clocks.
> > such as a clock that scientists would refer to a broken,
>
> You wouldn't catch a scientist doing such an imbecilic thing.
Of course not. Any scientist who uses the Galilean transformation equations is excluded from further participation in science.
> > put it in a car, and drive at sixty miles per hour past two mile markers,
> > according to what scientists call an ideal clock, the car goes from the
> > first mile marker to the second in exactly one minute, but according to
> > a slower clock, the car goes from one mile marker to the next in less
> > than a minute,
>
> But, of course, that wouldn't really be less than a minute, would it
> now, Bozo-brain.
>
It would be a minute according to the time of the slower clock.
> > meaning that if a person in the car did not know the clock was "broken",
> > they would believe the car to be traveling faster than 60 mph.
>
> It would mean the person in the car was slovenly, just like you are.
Slovenly? That cuts pretty deep, Gary.
> > So we have the same situation with any slower clock,
>
> No, we don't. I'm not a lazy fool like you are. I check my clocks.
Beware of pride lest ye should fall. I only have two clocks. My Walgreen's clock quit altogether last month, and I threw it away.
> > including the ones that Einstein and other scientists say they have.
>
> They're not lazy slovenly fools either, so your yammering is obfuscation.
Well, we know that scientists are very military in appearance and actions. But what would an individual scientist be like without the peer pressure of other scientists? We may never know.
> > Slower clocks result in faster results for velocities.
>
> Nope. You are disastrously wrong.
Well, I explained an experiment with a slower clock. Go ahead and explain one that proves what you are saying.
> > That is just what all experiments show.
>
> Nope. You are a dishonest sophist.
Dishonest sophist? I am hurt, Gary, really hurt.
>
> > > > So the muon reaches earth because its decay is slowed down by its
> > > > velocity.
> > >
> > > This violates the Principle of Relativity which is fundamental to 19th
> > > century science.
> > >
> > > You are one conflicted puppy.
> >
> > Principle of Relativity? I never had heard of it.
>
> Therefore you admit that you are a lazy, ignorant, dishonest yammerhead.
Yes, I certainly am, but that does not change the readings on any clocks.
> > Are you sure that the Principle of Relativity does not violate reality?
>
> It hasn't to date:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_relativity
>
> "The special principle of relativity was first explicitly enunciated by
> Galileo Galilei in 1632 in his Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World
> Systems, using the metaphor of Galileo's ship."
Oh, OK, I remember this. Galileo was using two clocks that agreed with each other. So the equations were:
x'=x-vt
y'=y
z'=z
t'=t
x = x' - v't'
y=y'
z=z'
> t = t'
v' = -v
> In order to even derive the GT or the LT, it is necessary to postulate
> that the dock is moving away from the ship at -v when the ship is moving
> at +v. This is really, really basic stuff, and the fact that you are
> completely unaware of this is proof that you are completely out to sea
> in an inner tube when talking about Newton and Galilean relativity.
No I am not completely out to sea. I got out of the Navy in 1970 and have not been out to sea since that time.
>
> And using a broken clock is really, really stupid because you could
> actually determine that the clock was broken by performing some other
> experiment that tests other laws of physics that involve time. So
> your yammering bull plop is nothing more than a puerile attempt to
> cloud the discussion with chicanery.
Peurile chicanery? You are getting as bad as Odd Bodkin with his hyperfine levels.
>
> Botton line: your Winn transform violates the Principle of Relativity
> which has NEVER been refuted and has ALWAYS bee upheld.
There is no Winn transform. I just use the Galilean transformation equations. I already stated numerous times that when times are stated in terms of different rates, you cannot mix the different definitions of time even though a day on Mars and a day on earth are both rotations of a planet on its axis or a transition of a cesium atom on earth and a transition of a cesium atom on Mercury are both transitions and Odd Bodkin could use the word hyperfine in the definition of any transitions of cesium atoms.
If we take two sets of Galilean transformation equations describing two different rates of time
x'=x-vt
y'=y
z'=z
t'=t
x = x' - v'n'
y = y'
z = z'
n = n'
n' is the same amount of time amount of time as t, but is expressed in terms of a different rate of measurement. v is the same speed as -v, but -v is expressed in terms of n', not t. It is no different from saying that x is 1 mile, and x' is one kilometer. In order to get the equation to work, you have to convert one unit of distance to the other. I know how difficult this must seem to people who believe in a length contraction.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 23:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pk2oo8$4nc$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #466773 |
Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> writes: >On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 10:08:28 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: >> > > Refuted by experimental evidence. Also, this contradicts one of the >> > > basic postulates of the GT and the LT (when the ship moves away from >> > > the dock at v, an observer on the ship sees the dock moving away at -v). >> > Well, but this idea is easily disproven because if we take a slower clock >> Why would anyone with a brain do such a stupid thing? >Well, I did it to determine what actually happens in experiments that have >slower clocks. >> > such as a clock that scientists would refer to a broken, >> You wouldn't catch a scientist doing such an imbecilic thing. >Of course not. Any scientist who uses the Galilean transformation >equations is excluded from further participation in science. As you reminded us, we shouldn't be discussing medical stuff. So I can't give a benefit of a doubt and have to ask, why would you say a stupid thing like "Any scientist who uses the Galilean transformation equations is excluded from further participation in science" ? So not only do you use broken clocks and expect that broken clocks result in valid results, you say some stupid things like "Any scientist who uses the Galilean transformation equations is excluded from further participation in science" and "But, as we see, scientists come into this discussion and censor any explanation that uses the Galilean transformation equations." Why say and do stupid things?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 16:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ab8f7765-551d-4bb0-9ba8-da8f2b364c20@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466786 |
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 4:33:30 PM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote: > Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> writes: > > >On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 10:08:28 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > >> > > Refuted by experimental evidence. Also, this contradicts one of the > >> > > basic postulates of the GT and the LT (when the ship moves away from > >> > > the dock at v, an observer on the ship sees the dock moving away at -v). > > >> > Well, but this idea is easily disproven because if we take a slower clock > > >> Why would anyone with a brain do such a stupid thing? > > >Well, I did it to determine what actually happens in experiments that have > >slower clocks. > > >> > such as a clock that scientists would refer to a broken, > > >> You wouldn't catch a scientist doing such an imbecilic thing. > > >Of course not. Any scientist who uses the Galilean transformation > >equations is excluded from further participation in science. > > As you reminded us, we shouldn't be discussing medical stuff. So I can't > give a benefit of a doubt and have to ask, why would you say a stupid > thing like "Any scientist who uses the Galilean transformation equations > is excluded from further participation in science" ? > > So not only do you use broken clocks and expect that broken clocks result > in valid results, you say some stupid things like "Any scientist who uses > the Galilean transformation equations is excluded from further > participation in science" and "But, as we see, scientists come into this > discussion and censor any explanation that uses the Galilean > transformation equations." Why say and do stupid things? Well, I observe what happens to scientists who say they believe the Galilean transformation equations. They are told they are not real scientists.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 19:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e7ff00bf-00c2-4f31-b306-15060e3ebfa2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466773 |
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 3:55:26 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote:
>
> On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 10:08:28 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> >
> > > > Refuted by experimental evidence. Also, this contradicts one of the
> > > > basic postulates of the GT and the LT (when the ship moves away from
> > > > the dock at v, an observer on the ship sees the dock moving away at
> > > > -v).
> > >
> > > Well, but this idea is easily disproven because if we take a slower
> > > clock
> >
> > Why would anyone with a brain do such a stupid thing?
> >
> Well, I did it to determine what actually happens in experiments that
> have slower clocks.
But scientists don't make experiments with slower clocks. Only stupid
people without brains do that.
> > > such as a clock that scientists would refer to a broken,
> >
> > You wouldn't catch a scientist doing such an imbecilic thing.
>
> Of course not. Any scientist who uses the Galilean transformation
> equations is excluded from further participation in science.
Just one more lie in an infinite series of lies perpetrated by Robert
Winn.
> > > put it in a car, and drive at sixty miles per hour past two mile
> > > markers, according to what scientists call an ideal clock, the car
> > > goes from the first mile marker to the second in exactly one minute,
> > > but according to a slower clock, the car goes from one mile marker
> > > to the next in less than a minute,
> >
> > But, of course, that wouldn't really be less than a minute, would it
> > now, Bozo-brain.
>
> It would be a minute according to the time of the slower clock.
Which slower clocks only imbeciles without brains would use.
> > > meaning that if a person in the car did not know the clock was
> > > "broken", they would believe the car to be traveling faster than
> > > 60 mph.
> >
> > It would mean the person in the car was slovenly, just like you are.
>
> Slovenly? That cuts pretty deep, Gary.
I can only tell the truth.
> > > So we have the same situation with any slower clock,
> >
> > No, we don't. I'm not a lazy fool like you are. I check my clocks.
>
> Beware of pride lest ye should fall.
Beware of slovenly accepting slow clocks, lest ye crash and burn.
> I only have two clocks. My Walgreen's clock quit altogether last
> month, and I threw it away.
""A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches
is never sure" -- Segal's Law
> > > including the ones that Einstein and other scientists say they have.
> >
> > They're not lazy slovenly fools either, so your yammering is
> > obfuscation.
>
> Well, we know that scientists are very military in appearance and actions.
:-)))
> But what would an individual scientist be like without the peer pressure
> of other scientists?
They would be liars like you.
> > > Slower clocks result in faster results for velocities.
> >
> > Nope. You are disastrously wrong.
>
> Well, I explained an experiment with a slower clock.
No self-respecting scientist would use a slow clock.
> Go ahead and explain one that proves what you are saying.
It's very simple: don't be a liar and use a GOOD clock. DUH!
> > > That is just what all experiments show.
> >
> > Nope. You are a dishonest sophist.
>
> Dishonest sophist? I am hurt, Gary, really hurt.
Is the word "dishonest" or "sophist" cause you pain?
> > > > > So the muon reaches earth because its decay is slowed down by its
> > > > > velocity.
> > > >
> > > > This violates the Principle of Relativity which is fundamental to
> > > > 19th century science.
> > > >
> > > > You are one conflicted puppy.
> > >
> > > Principle of Relativity? I never had heard of it.
> >
> > Therefore you admit that you are a lazy, ignorant, dishonest yammerhead.
>
> Yes, I certainly am, but that does not change the readings on any clocks.
It changes what is meant by the concept of time. You have a dishonest
concept.
> > > Are you sure that the Principle of Relativity does not violate
> > > reality?
> >
> > It hasn't to date:
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_relativity
> >
> > "The special principle of relativity was first explicitly enunciated by
> > Galileo Galilei in 1632 in his Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World
> > Systems, using the metaphor of Galileo's ship."
>
> Oh, OK, I remember this. Galileo was using two clocks that agreed with
> each other. So the equations were:
>
> x'=x-vt
> y'=y
> z'=z
> t'=t
>
> x = x' - v't'
No need to be convoluted about it. Just add vt to each side of the
original equation:
x' + vt = x - vt + vt
x' + vt = x
x = x' + vt
> y=y'
> z=z'
> > t = t'
>
> v' = -v
>
>
> > In order to even derive the GT or the LT, it is necessary to postulate
> > that the dock is moving away from the ship at -v when the ship is moving
> > at +v. This is really, really basic stuff, and the fact that you are
> > completely unaware of this is proof that you are completely out to sea
> > in an inner tube when talking about Newton and Galilean relativity.
>
> No I am not completely out to sea. I got out of the Navy in 1970 and
> have not been out to sea since that time.
Too bad you didn't learn how radar really works.
> > And using a broken clock is really, really stupid because you could
> > actually determine that the clock was broken by performing some other
> > experiment that tests other laws of physics that involve time. So
> > your yammering bull plop is nothing more than a puerile attempt to
> > cloud the discussion with chicanery.
>
> Peurile chicanery? You are getting as bad as Odd Bodkin with his
> hyperfine levels.
I can only tell the truth.
> > Botton line: your Winn transform violates the Principle of Relativity
> > which has NEVER been refuted and has ALWAYS bee upheld.
>
> There is no Winn transform.
Yes there is. You bloviate about it all the time. You are a liar.
> I just use the Galilean transformation equations.
No, you don't. You use your asinine t' = n' bull plop.
> [Regurgitated bullshit deleted]
> If we take two sets of Galilean transformation equations describing two
> different rates of time
>
> x'=x-vt
> y'=y
> z'=z
> t'=t
>
> x = x' - v'n'
> y = y'
> z = z'
> n = n'
Which is your refuted Winn transform, lying weasel.
> [More regurgitated bullshit deleted]
When are you going down to Ace Hardware and having a working brain
driven under your skull?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 20:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <53f22e57-7c4d-4c50-a7cf-bc85443c135b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466795 |
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 7:26:41 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > Yes, I certainly am, but that does not change the readings on any clocks. > > It changes what is meant by the concept of time. You have a dishonest > concept. > In what way is my concept dishonest? > > > > Are you sure that the Principle of Relativity does not violate > > > > reality? > > > > > > It hasn't to date: > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_relativity > > > > > > "The special principle of relativity was first explicitly enunciated by > > > Galileo Galilei in 1632 in his Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World > > > Systems, using the metaphor of Galileo's ship." > > > > Oh, OK, I remember this. Galileo was using two clocks that agreed with > > each other. So the equations were: > > > > x'=x-vt > > y'=y > > z'=z > > t'=t > > > > x = x' - v't' > > No need to be convoluted about it. Just add vt to each side of the > original equation: No, there is a principle involved here. Variables in S' are expressed as variables in S'. x = x' - v't' is the inverse of x'=x-vt. You scientists tend to do everything with speeds, not velocities. v' is the velocity of S relative to S'. So then it follows that v'= -v. > x' + vt = x - vt + vt > x' + vt = x > x = x' + vt > > > y=y' > > z=z' > > > t = t' > > > > v' = -v > > > > > > > In order to even derive the GT or the LT, it is necessary to postulate > > > that the dock is moving away from the ship at -v when the ship is moving > > > at +v. This is really, really basic stuff, and the fact that you are > > > completely unaware of this is proof that you are completely out to sea > > > in an inner tube when talking about Newton and Galilean relativity. Well, no, I was just showing the complete mathematics. There is a velocity of S' relative to S as seen from S. That is v. There is a velocity of S relative to S' as seen from S'. That is v'. So then it follows that v'= -v. This is all true when t'=t. > > > > No I am not completely out to sea. I got out of the Navy in 1970 and > > have not been out to sea since that time. > > Too bad you didn't learn how radar really works. I never even went to electronics school. But I did know how radar repeaters work. I was the fastest in Seventh Fleet at fixing them. They used to send me by helicopter to other ships when they could not fix their radar repeaters. > > > > And using a broken clock is really, really stupid because you could > > > actually determine that the clock was broken by performing some other > > > experiment that tests other laws of physics that involve time. So > > > your yammering bull plop is nothing more than a puerile attempt to > > > cloud the discussion with chicanery. > > Peurile chicanery? You are getting as bad as Odd Bodkin with his > > hyperfine levels. > > I can only tell the truth. > > > Botton line: your Winn transform violates the Principle of Relativity > > > which has NEVER been refuted and has ALWAYS bee upheld. > > > > There is no Winn transform. > > Yes there is. You bloviate about it all the time. You are a liar. > > > I just use the Galilean transformation equations. > > No, you don't. You use your asinine t' = n' bull plop. Well, see, there is your mistake. t' does not = n'. That would be like saying 1 mile = 1 kilometer. See how easy that was? > > [Regurgitated bullshit deleted] > > > If we take two sets of Galilean transformation equations describing two > > different rates of time > > > > x'=x-vt > > y'=y > > z'=z > > t'=t > > > > x = x' - v'n' > > y = y' > > z = z' > > n = n' > > Which is your refuted Winn transform, lying weasel. It is just two different sets of Galilean transformation equations describing the same thing. It is no different from using kilometers in one set of Galilean transformation equations and miles in another set describing the same distances. What scientists do not seem to understand is that you cannot just miles and kilometers in the same set of equations just because they are both measures of distance and they describe the same distance. See, what you do is convert kilometers to miles or miles to kilometers. Then you can use them in the same equation. > > > [More regurgitated bullshit deleted] > > When are you going down to Ace Hardware and having a working brain > driven under your skull? I was there just this morning. The pump in my swamp cooler quit last night.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 21:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <03aaa02b-2426-4027-ac6c-d333dc274da8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466797 |
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 9:16:53 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 7:26:41 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > Yes, I certainly am, but that does not change the readings on any > > > clocks. > > > > It changes what is meant by the concept of time. You have a dishonest > > concept. > > > In what way is my concept dishonest? Can't you read? "It changes what is meant by the concept of time." It changes it into meaningless bull plop. > > > Oh, OK, I remember this. Galileo was using two clocks that agreed > > > with each other. So the equations were: > > > > > > x'=x-vt > > > y'=y > > > z'=z > > > t'=t > > > > > > x = x' - v't' > > > > No need to be convoluted about it. Just add vt to each side of the > > original equation: > > No, there is a principle involved here. Of course: the principle is mathematical honesty. > Variables in S' are expressed as variables in S'. > > x = x' - v't' is the inverse of x'=x-vt. If and ONLY if v' = -v. There is no need to invent a new parameter (in the GT and SR, v is a constant, not a variable). > You scientists tend to do everything with speeds, not velocities. Dead wrong, dodo-head. > v' is the velocity of S relative to S'. > So then it follows that v'= -v. > > > x' + vt = x - vt + vt > > x' + vt = x > > x = x' + vt > > > > > y=y' > > > z=z' > > > > t = t' > > > > > > v' = -v > > > > > > > > > > In order to even derive the GT or the LT, it is necessary to > > > > postulate that the dock is moving away from the ship at -v > > > > when the ship is moving at +v. This is really, really basic > > > > stuff, and the fact that you are completely unaware of this > > > > is proof that you are completely out to sea in an inner tube > > > > when talking about Newton and Galilean relativity. > > Well, no, I was just showing the complete mathematics. Prevarication. I was the one that showed the CORRECT mathematics. > There is a velocity of S' relative to S as seen from S. That is v. > There is a velocity of S relative to S' as seen from S'. That is v'. > So then it follows that v'= -v. This is all true when t'=t. It's also true for the LT where t' = gamma*(t - v*x/c^2) > > > No I am not completely out to sea. I got out of the Navy in 1970 and > > > have not been out to sea since that time. > > > > Too bad you didn't learn how radar really works. > > I never even went to electronics school. But I did know how radar > repeaters work. I was the fastest in Seventh Fleet at fixing them. They > used to send me by helicopter to other ships when they could not fix > their radar repeaters. Fixing them doesn't mean you know how they work. > > > > Botton line: your Winn transform violates the Principle of > > > > Relativity which has NEVER been refuted and has ALWAYS bee upheld. > > > > > > There is no Winn transform. > > > > Yes there is. You bloviate about it all the time. You are a liar. > > > > > I just use the Galilean transformation equations. > > > > No, you don't. You use your asinine t' = n' bull plop. > > Well, see, there is your mistake. t' does not = n'. That would be like > saying 1 mile = 1 kilometer. See how easy that was? No, I didn't make a mistake. YOU are the one that made the mistake of introducing n and n' in the first place. THAT is what destroys the Principle of Relativity in your Winn transform. > > > [Regurgitated bullshit deleted] > > > > > If we take two sets of Galilean transformation equations describing > > > two different rates of time > > > > > > x'=x-vt > > > y'=y > > > z'=z > > > t'=t > > > > > > x = x' - v'n' > > > y = y' > > > z = z' > > > n = n' > > > > Which is your refuted Winn transform, lying weasel. > > It is just two different sets of Galilean transformation equations > describing the same thing. No, it's not the GT since it destroys the PoR which is a cornerstone of the GT and the LT. > [Lies deleted] > > > > [More regurgitated bullshit deleted] > > > > When are you going down to Ace Hardware and having a working brain > > driven under your skull? > > I was there just this morning. The pump in my swamp cooler quit last > night. That's tough considering the weather in AZ these days.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 21:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <19605877-afa5-48de-9cca-fcf30cfb6684@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466798 |
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 9:05:29 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 9:16:53 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > > > On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 7:26:41 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > > > Yes, I certainly am, but that does not change the readings on any > > > > clocks. > > > > > > It changes what is meant by the concept of time. You have a dishonest > > > concept. > > > > > In what way is my concept dishonest? > > Can't you read? "It changes what is meant by the concept of time." It does not change anything, any more than kilometers change miles. If one clock is slower or faster than another, they both still have physical realities concerning where clock hands are, what numbers are shown on a digital clock, etc. You Special Relativity people are the ones who think that lengths are contracted. > > It changes it into meaningless bull plop. > > > > > Oh, OK, I remember this. Galileo was using two clocks that agreed > > > > with each other. So the equations were: > > > > > > > > x'=x-vt > > > > y'=y > > > > z'=z > > > > t'=t > > > > > > > > x = x' - v't' > > > > > > No need to be convoluted about it. Just add vt to each side of the > > > original equation: > > > > No, there is a principle involved here. > > Of course: the principle is mathematical honesty. > > > Variables in S' are expressed as variables in S'. > > > > x = x' - v't' is the inverse of x'=x-vt. > > If and ONLY if v' = -v. There is no need to invent a new parameter (in > the GT and SR, v is a constant, not a variable). > > > You scientists tend to do everything with speeds, not velocities. > > Dead wrong, dodo-head. > > > v' is the velocity of S relative to S'. > > So then it follows that v'= -v. > > > > > x' + vt = x - vt + vt > > > x' + vt = x > > > x = x' + vt > > > > > > > y=y' > > > > z=z' > > > > > t = t' > > > > > > > > v' = -v > > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to even derive the GT or the LT, it is necessary to > > > > > postulate that the dock is moving away from the ship at -v > > > > > when the ship is moving at +v. This is really, really basic > > > > > stuff, and the fact that you are completely unaware of this > > > > > is proof that you are completely out to sea in an inner tube > > > > > when talking about Newton and Galilean relativity. > > > > Well, no, I was just showing the complete mathematics. > > Prevarication. I was the one that showed the CORRECT mathematics. > > > There is a velocity of S' relative to S as seen from S. That is v. > > There is a velocity of S relative to S' as seen from S'. That is v'. > > So then it follows that v'= -v. This is all true when t'=t. > > It's also true for the LT where t' = gamma*(t - v*x/c^2) > > > > > No I am not completely out to sea. I got out of the Navy in 1970 and > > > > have not been out to sea since that time. > > > > > > Too bad you didn't learn how radar really works. > > > > I never even went to electronics school. But I did know how radar > > repeaters work. I was the fastest in Seventh Fleet at fixing them. They > > used to send me by helicopter to other ships when they could not fix > > their radar repeaters. > > Fixing them doesn't mean you know how they work. > > > > > > Botton line: your Winn transform violates the Principle of > > > > > Relativity which has NEVER been refuted and has ALWAYS bee upheld. > > > > > > > > There is no Winn transform. > > > > > > Yes there is. You bloviate about it all the time. You are a liar. > > > > > > > I just use the Galilean transformation equations. > > > > > > No, you don't. You use your asinine t' = n' bull plop. > > > > Well, see, there is your mistake. t' does not = n'. That would be like > > saying 1 mile = 1 kilometer. See how easy that was? > > No, I didn't make a mistake. YOU are the one that made the mistake of introducing n and n' in the first place. THAT is what destroys the > Principle of Relativity in your Winn transform. > > > > > [Regurgitated bullshit deleted] > > > > > > > If we take two sets of Galilean transformation equations describing > > > > two different rates of time > > > > > > > > x'=x-vt > > > > y'=y > > > > z'=z > > > > t'=t > > > > > > > > x = x' - v'n' > > > > y = y' > > > > z = z' > > > > n = n' > > > > > > Which is your refuted Winn transform, lying weasel. > > > > It is just two different sets of Galilean transformation equations > > describing the same thing. > > No, it's not the GT since it destroys the PoR which is a cornerstone > of the GT and the LT. > > > [Lies deleted] > > > > > > [More regurgitated bullshit deleted] > > > > > > When are you going down to Ace Hardware and having a working brain > > > driven under your skull? > > > > I was there just this morning. The pump in my swamp cooler quit last > > night. > > That's tough considering the weather in AZ these days. No big deal. Heat never has bothered me. Someone else is always going to pass out before I do. I found that out when I was fighting forest fires back before I went in the Navy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 05:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2f48c5f6-944c-4e5f-8dc0-7e2f02a7a999@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466800 |
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 10:18:09 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 9:05:29 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 9:16:53 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 7:26:41 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yes, I certainly am, but that does not change the readings on any > > > > > clocks. > > > > > > > > It changes what is meant by the concept of time. You have a > > > > dishonest concept. > > > > > > > In what way is my concept dishonest? > > > > Can't you read? "It changes what is meant by the concept of time." > > It does not change anything, any more than kilometers change miles. Liar. > If one clock is slower or faster than another, they both still have > physical realities concerning where clock hands are, what numbers are > shown on a digital clock, etc. Non sequitur and more dishonesty. > You Special Relativity people are the ones who think that lengths are > contracted. "Relativity people" don't think that lengths are contracted. Didn't you get the memo? LC occurs because what is simultaneous in one frame is not simultaneous in a different frame. It's all about time. Geesh! > > It changes it into meaningless bull plop. And the Winn transform still stinks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@python.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 14:29 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <5b659c24$0$14298$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #466815 |
Gary Harnagel wrote: ... > And the Winn transform still stinks. Winn’s transformation exposed: http://www.unitefitness.com/philly-east/2015/07/22/dr-winns-transformation/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 05:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a93e952b-66e8-48a2-9465-bcf529341e60@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466816 |
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 6:29:26 AM UTC-6, Python wrote: > > Gary Harnagel wrote: > ... > > And the Winn transform still stinks. > > Winn’s transformation exposed: > > http://www.unitefitness.com/philly-east/2015/07/22/dr-winns-transformation/ Sign me up ... on second thought, DON'T :-))
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 06:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a9476cb5-6493-46e1-8643-e5385101f1af@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466815 |
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 5:23:41 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
>
> "Relativity people" don't think that lengths are contracted. Didn't you
> get the memo? LC occurs because what is simultaneous in one frame is not
> simultaneous in a different frame. It's all about time. Geesh!
>
> > > It changes it into meaningless bull plop.
>
> And the Winn transform still stinks.
OK, I think it is time to fully explain the equations, and then scientists can express their objections in a more knowledgeable manner. We have a GPS satellite in orbit around the earth. A clock in the GPS satellite has a faster rate of time than a clock on earth. How do we express this mathematically?
First, we show the clock on earth.
x'=x-vt
y'=y
z'=z
t'=t
t is the time of the clock on earth. It has a certain number of transitions of a cesium atom in the frame of reference of the clock on earth.
Now we have an identical clock in the satellite. In the frame of reference of the satellite, the clock in the satellite has the same number of transitions per second as the clock on earth, but because the gravitation is less, the clock in the satellite has a faster rate of transitions. So now we need to show the time of the clock in the satellite in equation form. Can we say that the time of the clock in the satellite is t'? No, we cannot because t' is already defined to be t'=t, and the rate of transitions in the satellite clock is faster. We have to use a different variable for the time of the clock in the satellite. So we use n'.
x = x' - v'n'
y = y'
z = z'
n = n'
Now we should pause in our explanation to give scientists time to explain how the second set of Galilean transformation equations is not a set of Galilean transformation equations or why we cannot use n' to be the time of the clock in the satellite. We will provide a space for their explanation.
[Space]
So scientists tell us what they have done. They have adjusted the rate of the clock in the satellite to match the rate of the clock on earth. How do we describe this mathematically?
Well, just as kilometers cannot be used in a set of Galilean transformation equations in which distances are measured in miles, n' cannot be used in the set of Galilean transformation equations in which t'=t. But if kilometers are converted to miles, they can be used in the equations in which distances are measured in miles. By the same reasoning, if n' is converted to t', that time can be used in the equation in which t'=t. When the clock in the satellite is adjusted to match the clock on earth, n' is converted to t'.
So now we will provide another space for the comments of scientists.
[Space]
See how easy that was?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 07:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6daac4b3-4328-4aab-bf13-aef3b33272dc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466828 |
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 7:47:54 AM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 5:23:41 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > "Relativity people" don't think that lengths are contracted. Didn't > > you get the memo? LC occurs because what is simultaneous in one > > frame is not simultaneous in a different frame. It's all about time. > > Geesh! > > > > > > It changes it into meaningless bull plop. > > > > And the Winn transform still stinks. > > OK, I think it is time to fully explain the equations, You are not competent to do so. > and then scientists can express their objections in a more knowledgeable > manner. We have a GPS satellite in orbit around the earth. This is changing the subject, which amounts to obfuscation and dishonesty. > [Regurgitated bull plop deleted] > > Now we should pause in our explanation to give scientists time to > explain how the second set of Galilean transformation equations is > not a set of Galilean transformation equations or why we cannot use > n' to be the time of the clock in the satellite. We will provide a > space for their explanation. > [Space] [Space] is what fills your head. The explanation has already been given: your asinine Winn transform contradicts a postulate of the GT. > [More bull plop deleted] See how easy that was?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 09:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a7413147-9a05-4e75-8ba7-887ec757e617@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466838 |
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 7:53:08 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 7:47:54 AM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 5:23:41 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > "Relativity people" don't think that lengths are contracted. Didn't > > > you get the memo? LC occurs because what is simultaneous in one > > > frame is not simultaneous in a different frame. It's all about time. > > > Geesh! > > > > > > > > It changes it into meaningless bull plop. > > > > > > And the Winn transform still stinks. > > > > OK, I think it is time to fully explain the equations, > > You are not competent to do so. > > > and then scientists can express their objections in a more knowledgeable > > manner. We have a GPS satellite in orbit around the earth. > > This is changing the subject, which amounts to obfuscation and dishonesty. > > > [Regurgitated bull plop deleted] > > > > Now we should pause in our explanation to give scientists time to > > explain how the second set of Galilean transformation equations is > > not a set of Galilean transformation equations or why we cannot use > > n' to be the time of the clock in the satellite. We will provide a > > space for their explanation. > > [Space] > > [Space] is what fills your head. The explanation has already been given: > your asinine Winn transform contradicts a postulate of the GT. > > > [More bull plop deleted] > > See how easy that was? OK, we see what science always does. See above: The explanation has already been given. Hey, Gary, we must have missed the explanation. Could you give it again? Watch what happens.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 10:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <25141fa3-de19-48fe-b721-03eb7adbfaa7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466857 |
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 10:51:11 AM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 7:53:08 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 7:47:54 AM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > > > > > and then scientists can express their objections in a more > > > knowledgeable manner. We have a GPS satellite in orbit around > > > the earth. > > > > This is changing the subject, which amounts to obfuscation and > > dishonesty. > > > > > [Regurgitated bull plop deleted] > > > > > > Now we should pause in our explanation to give scientists time to > > > explain how the second set of Galilean transformation equations is > > > not a set of Galilean transformation equations or why we cannot use > > > n' to be the time of the clock in the satellite. We will provide a > > > space for their explanation. > > > [Space] > > > > [Space] is what fills your head. The explanation has already been > > given: your asinine Winn transform contradicts a postulate of the GT. > > > > > [More bull plop deleted] > > > > See how easy that was? > > OK, we see what science always does. See above: The explanation has > already been given. But it has. > Hey, Gary, we must have missed the explanation. Could you give it again? > Watch what happens. "your asinine Winn transform contradicts a postulate of the GT." Referring to the Principle of Relativity which has been confirmed by EVERY applicable experiment and refuted by none. So unless you can refute PoR by an actual experiment, your bull plop is dead in the water. End of story.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 11:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <93c34ac7-284a-43e4-9e17-5d75e1ec40e0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466864 |
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 19:59:58 UTC+2, Gary Harnagel wrote: > Referring to the Principle of Relativity which has been confirmed by > EVERY applicable experiment and refuted by none. Every fanatic idiot can say it, and many of them do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 12:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0d3d84db-7edf-49e0-b578-89c3500872cc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466864 |
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 10:59:58 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 10:51:11 AM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 7:53:08 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> > >
> > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 7:47:54 AM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > and then scientists can express their objections in a more
> > > > knowledgeable manner. We have a GPS satellite in orbit around
> > > > the earth.
> > >
> > > This is changing the subject, which amounts to obfuscation and
> > > dishonesty.
> > >
> > > > [Regurgitated bull plop deleted]
> > > >
> > > > Now we should pause in our explanation to give scientists time to
> > > > explain how the second set of Galilean transformation equations is
> > > > not a set of Galilean transformation equations or why we cannot use
> > > > n' to be the time of the clock in the satellite. We will provide a
> > > > space for their explanation.
> > > > [Space]
> > >
> > > [Space] is what fills your head. The explanation has already been
> > > given: your asinine Winn transform contradicts a postulate of the GT.
> > >
> > > > [More bull plop deleted]
> > >
> > > See how easy that was?
> >
> > OK, we see what science always does. See above: The explanation has
> > already been given.
>
> But it has.
>
> > Hey, Gary, we must have missed the explanation. Could you give it again?
> > Watch what happens.
>
> "your asinine Winn transform contradicts a postulate of the GT."
>
> Referring to the Principle of Relativity which has been confirmed by
> EVERY applicable experiment and refuted by none.
>
> So unless you can refute PoR by an actual experiment, your bull plop
> is dead in the water. End of story.
Well, I thought we agreed that Galileo's principle of relativity was that velocity as seen from S would be minus the velocity as seen from S'. So what is the problem you see?
We have a clock in a GPS satellite that is faster than an identical clock on earth. So if we use the time of the clock in the GPS satellite to calculate the speed of the satellite, we get a slower speed than a scientist on earth gets using his slower clock on earth. What is wrong?
I know how difficult this is for scientists to understand, but you have to convert n', the time of the clock in the satellite to t', the time of the clock on the ground. t'=t See the two little horizontal lines between t' and t?
So now scientists do something amazing. They adjust the time of the clock in the satellite so that it agrees with the clock on the ground. Suddenly things have changed. The time of the clock in the satellite is t'. We can use this set of equations:
x'=x-vt
y'=y
z'=z
t'=t
I know how confusing this must seem to scientists. They were told there was a length contraction. The Galilean transformation equations do not have a length contraction. What should scientists do?
I think they should start using the correct equations, but I do not believe that will happen. What are you going to do, admit that a high school graduate showed you the correct equations for relativity?
No, you are going to call me some dirty names. You are a scientist. You are going to do what other scientists say needs to be done to protect your position of artificial authority.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 13:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <99e74a32-5c5d-4047-b429-fc0f3c04bb2c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466871 |
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:22:13 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 10:59:58 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 10:51:11 AM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > > > > > OK, we see what science always does. See above: The explanation has > > > already been given. > > > > But it has. > > > > > Hey, Gary, we must have missed the explanation. Could you give it > > > again? > > > Watch what happens. > > > > "your asinine Winn transform contradicts a postulate of the GT." > > > > Referring to the Principle of Relativity which has been confirmed by > > EVERY applicable experiment and refuted by none. > > > > So unless you can refute PoR by an actual experiment, your bull plop > > is dead in the water. End of story. > > Well, I thought we agreed that Galileo's principle of relativity was that > velocity as seen from S would be minus the velocity as seen from S'. Yes, that's part of it. Indeed the important part that the Winn transform denies. > So what is the problem you see? You said it yourself: you claim that a muon moving at 0.99c would see the earth coming at it faster than the speed of light. > We have a clock in a GPS satellite The GPS stuff is off the table. The GT refers strictly to inertial motion. > [Regurgitated moronic obfuscation deleted] > I think they should start using the correct equations, They are using equations MUCH more correct than the refuted Winn transform. > but I do not believe that will happen. But it has. The problem is that you are insisting that white is black. > What are you going to do, admit that a high school graduate showed you > the correct equations for relativity? > No, you are going to call me some dirty names. Mud sucker! > You are a scientist. You are going to do what other scientists say > needs to be done to protect your position of artificial authority. Are you feeling a little paranoid?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 14:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4845391e-e729-4135-98fa-993b63c8512e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466879 |
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:25:38 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:22:13 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 10:59:58 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 10:51:11 AM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, we see what science always does. See above: The explanation has > > > > already been given. > > > > > > But it has. > > > > > > > Hey, Gary, we must have missed the explanation. Could you give it > > > > again? > > > > Watch what happens. > > > > > > "your asinine Winn transform contradicts a postulate of the GT." > > > > > > Referring to the Principle of Relativity which has been confirmed by > > > EVERY applicable experiment and refuted by none. > > > > > > So unless you can refute PoR by an actual experiment, your bull plop > > > is dead in the water. End of story. > > > > Well, I thought we agreed that Galileo's principle of relativity was that > > velocity as seen from S would be minus the velocity as seen from S'. > > Yes, that's part of it. Indeed the important part that the Winn transform > denies. > > > So what is the problem you see? > > You said it yourself: you claim that a muon moving at 0.99c would see > the earth coming at it faster than the speed of light. > > > We have a clock in a GPS satellite > > The GPS stuff is off the table. The GT refers strictly to inertial > motion. > > > [Regurgitated moronic obfuscation deleted] > > > I think they should start using the correct equations, > > They are using equations MUCH more correct than the refuted Winn > transform. > > > but I do not believe that will happen. > > But it has. The problem is that you are insisting that white is black. > > > What are you going to do, admit that a high school graduate showed you > > the correct equations for relativity? > > No, you are going to call me some dirty names. > > Mud sucker! > > > You are a scientist. You are going to do what other scientists say > > needs to be done to protect your position of artificial authority. > > Are you feeling a little paranoid? Are you feeling a little scientific?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 15:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6c7e15d6-3b10-4b00-a75e-69964b7a8299@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466884 |
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 3:09:25 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:25:38 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:22:13 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > > > > > Well, I thought we agreed that Galileo's principle of relativity was > > > that velocity as seen from S would be minus the velocity as seen > > > from S'. > > > > Yes, that's part of it. Indeed the important part that the Winn > > transform denies. > > > > > So what is the problem you see? > > > > You said it yourself: you claim that a muon moving at 0.99c would see > > the earth coming at it faster than the speed of light. > > > > > We have a clock in a GPS satellite > > > > The GPS stuff is off the table. The GT refers strictly to inertial > > motion. > > > > > [Regurgitated moronic obfuscation deleted] > > > > > I think they should start using the correct equations, > > > > They are using equations MUCH more correct than the refuted Winn > > transform. > > > > > but I do not believe that will happen. > > > > But it has. The problem is that you are insisting that white is black. > > > > > What are you going to do, admit that a high school graduate showed you > > > the correct equations for relativity? > > > No, you are going to call me some dirty names. > > > > Mud sucker! > > > > > You are a scientist. You are going to do what other scientists say > > > needs to be done to protect your position of artificial authority. > > > > Are you feeling a little paranoid? > > Are you feeling a little scientific? Always. So now we agree that the Winn transform is bull plop because a slow clock moving at less than c will measure the "stationary" clock as moving with speed greater than the speed of light, contradicting the PoR. So now we'll see what you will do: “To hate being wrong is to change your opinion when you are proven wrong; whereas pride, even when proven wrong, decides to go on being wrong.” ― Criss Jami
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 22:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d667db6e-fb0a-49b1-93fe-86484f946067@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466894 |
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 3:05:27 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 3:09:25 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:25:38 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:22:13 PM UTC-6, Robert Winn wrote: > > > > > > > > Well, I thought we agreed that Galileo's principle of relativity was > > > > that velocity as seen from S would be minus the velocity as seen > > > > from S'. > > > > > > Yes, that's part of it. Indeed the important part that the Winn > > > transform denies. > > > > > > > So what is the problem you see? > > > > > > You said it yourself: you claim that a muon moving at 0.99c would see > > > the earth coming at it faster than the speed of light. > > > > > > > We have a clock in a GPS satellite > > > > > > The GPS stuff is off the table. The GT refers strictly to inertial > > > motion. > > > > > > > [Regurgitated moronic obfuscation deleted] > > > > > > > I think they should start using the correct equations, > > > > > > They are using equations MUCH more correct than the refuted Winn > > > transform. > > > > > > > but I do not believe that will happen. > > > > > > But it has. The problem is that you are insisting that white is black. > > > > > > > What are you going to do, admit that a high school graduate showed you > > > > the correct equations for relativity? > > > > No, you are going to call me some dirty names. > > > > > > Mud sucker! > > > > > > > You are a scientist. You are going to do what other scientists say > > > > needs to be done to protect your position of artificial authority. > > > > > > Are you feeling a little paranoid? > > > > Are you feeling a little scientific? > > Always. > > So now we agree that the Winn transform is bull plop because a slow clock > moving at less than c will measure the "stationary" clock as moving with > speed greater than the speed of light, contradicting the PoR. > > So now we'll see what you will do: A slow clock measures a lot of things going faster than c. That is why you have to convert the time of a slow clock to t'.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web