Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #462817 > unrolled thread

Amber and iron

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Amber and iron John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-27 19:16 -0700
    Re: Amber and iron Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-06-27 19:57 -0700
      Re: Amber and iron mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-06-27 21:50 -0700
        Re: Amber and iron Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-07-01 17:00 +0000
          Re: Amber and iron mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-01 13:18 -0700
            Re: Amber and iron Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-02 03:31 +0200
              Re: Amber and iron mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-01 19:04 -0700
                Re: Amber and iron Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-07-03 01:14 +0200
    Re: Amber and iron Oren Woodcock <uw@osiweoq.lp> - 2018-06-28 18:58 +0000

#462817 — Amber and iron

This is the beginning. Amber, a resin from a tree and iron from the ground create the crudest magnet. Where have we gained from here? In science, we don't really talk this way- the way nature crudely reacts.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#462819

On Wednesday, June 27, 2018 at 4:16:06 PM UTC-10, John Gogo wrote:
> This is the beginning. Amber, a resin from a tree and iron from the ground create the crudest magnet. Where have we gained from here? In science, we don't really talk this way- the way nature crudely reacts.

Lightning and iron ore. Those are the lodestones.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#462827

On Wednesday, June 27, 2018 at 7:57:49 PM UTC-7, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 27, 2018 at 4:16:06 PM UTC-10, John Gogo wrote:
> > This is the beginning. Amber, a resin from a tree and iron from the ground create the crudest magnet. Where have we gained from here? In science, we don't really talk this way- the way nature crudely reacts.
> 
> Lightning and iron ore. Those are the lodestones.

Do they have their own magnetospheres?

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463173

mitchrae3323 wrote:

> On Wednesday, June 27, 2018 at 7:57:49 PM UTC-7, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
>> On Wednesday, June 27, 2018 at 4:16:06 PM UTC-10, John Gogo wrote:
>> > This is the beginning. Amber, a resin from a tree and iron from the
>> > ground create the crudest magnet. Where have we gained from here? In
>> > science, we don't really talk this way- the way nature crudely
>> > reacts.
>> 
>> Lightning and iron ore. Those are the lodestones.
> 
> Do they have their own magnetospheres? Mitchell Raemsch

There is no such thing, my old friend. Magneto-sphere. That's fictional. 
The thing is that the GEOMETRY again, has to be involved (pasive), or even 
better, my 

*_Divergent Matter of the Moving Bodies Model_* steps in, in a way not yet 
obvious. I'm working hard at it, right now as we speak. Wish me good luck.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463191

On Sunday, July 1, 2018 at 10:00:45 AM UTC-7, Oren Woodcock wrote:
> mitchrae3323 wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday, June 27, 2018 at 7:57:49 PM UTC-7, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, June 27, 2018 at 4:16:06 PM UTC-10, John Gogo wrote:
> >> > This is the beginning. Amber, a resin from a tree and iron from the
> >> > ground create the crudest magnet. Where have we gained from here? In
> >> > science, we don't really talk this way- the way nature crudely
> >> > reacts.
> >> 
> >> Lightning and iron ore. Those are the lodestones.
> > 
> > Do they have their own magnetospheres? Mitchell Raemsch
> 
> There is no such thing, my old friend. Magneto-sphere. That's fictional. 

What isn't round is what is fictional...
 
> The thing is that the GEOMETRY again, has to be involved (pasive), or even 
> better, my 

The shape of all force is spherical/radial.
Magnetism is a double lobed sphere sharing
a common center with Earth's gravity force
sphere/radial center. Gravity-magnetic shares
an absolute center with the Earth's.

> 
> *_Divergent Matter of the Moving Bodies Model_* steps in, in a way not yet 
> obvious. I'm working hard at it, right now as we speak. Wish me good luck.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463211

mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> The shape of all force is spherical/radial.

Such a NONSENSE, it is NOT EVEN WRONG.

> Magnetism is a double lobed sphere

Magnetism is AN EFFECT instead.

You describe the MAGNETIC FIELD in peculiar terms; ANOTHER THING.

> sharing a common center with Earth's gravity force
> sphere/radial center. Gravity-magnetic shares
> an absolute center with the Earth's.

No.  When you are MINDLESSLY LUMPING TOGETHER terms and meanings, your
argument is woefully INADEQUATE.  Your UNEDUCATED GUESSES are HOPELESS.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463218

On Sunday, July 1, 2018 at 6:31:54 PM UTC-7, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> > The shape of all force is spherical/radial.
> 
> Such a NONSENSE, it is NOT EVEN WRONG.

All forces are spherical...

> 
> > Magnetism is a double lobed sphere
> 
> Magnetism is AN EFFECT instead.

No. It is a force. And it shares the same center
with gravity at the absolute center of the axis
of the Earth.

> 
> You describe the MAGNETIC FIELD in peculiar terms; ANOTHER THING.
> 
> > sharing a common center with Earth's gravity force
> > sphere/radial center. Gravity-magnetic shares
> > an absolute center with the Earth's.
> 
> No.  When you are MINDLESSLY LUMPING TOGETHER terms and meanings, your
> argument is woefully INADEQUATE.  Your UNEDUCATED GUESSES are HOPELESS.
> 
> -- 
> PointedEars
> 
> Twitter: @PointedEars2
> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463309

mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote:
> […]
> All forces are spherical...
> […]
>> Magnetism is AN EFFECT instead.
> 
> No. It is a force. And it shares the same center
> with gravity at the absolute center of the axis
> of the Earth.

Even if you repeat this nonsense 100 times, that does not make it true.

It merely demonstrates your ignorance.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#462874

John Gogo wrote:

> This is the beginning. Amber, a resin from a tree and iron from the
> ground create the crudest magnet. Where have we gained from here? In
> science, we don't really talk this way- the way nature crudely reacts.

It has nothing to do with anything. ZEROO.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web