Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #431074 > unrolled thread

Re: Take your own advice, Tom Roberts.

Started byYousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com>
First post2017-09-04 14:34 -0400
Last post2017-09-05 14:04 +0000
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Take your own advice, Tom Roberts. Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-09-04 14:34 -0400
    Re: Take your own advice, Tom Roberts. Ethel Ocallaghan <unlgclo@awlwaac.ag> - 2017-09-05 11:40 +0000
    Re: "Black Holes" are forever a notion, never measured. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-05 14:04 +0000

#431074 — Re: Take your own advice, Tom Roberts.

FromYousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com>
Date2017-09-04 14:34 -0400
SubjectRe: Take your own advice, Tom Roberts.
Message-ID<Y9qdnXYxVpsbATDEnZ2dnUU7-KXNnZ2d@giganews.com>
On 18/08/2017 10:30 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> A very dense objects, yes.
> TRUE black holes, no.
> 
> Black Holes violate the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle wavelength would be extremely tiny 
for a black hole, way less than a Planck Length. The larger an object 
is, the smaller its uncertainty is. So try another principle of physics 
which you don't understand, maybe that one will stick?

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/uncer.html

	Yousuf Khan

-- 
Sent from Giganews on Thunderbird on my Toshiba laptop

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#431151

FromEthel Ocallaghan <unlgclo@awlwaac.ag>
Date2017-09-05 11:40 +0000
Message-ID<oom2fa$16l$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#431074
Yousuf Khan wrote:

>> Black Holes violate the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
> 
> The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle wavelength would be extremely tiny
> for a black hole, way less than a Planck Length. The larger an object
> is, the smaller its uncertainty is. So try another principle of physics
> which you don't understand, maybe that one will stick?

Another excellent post. What it says essentially is, that The Black Holes 
Theory is obsolete and deprecated. Once even the plank length gets 
refutable, so many weird things gonne happen. It stays actually described 
in the Bible. Something people can read, but not understand. Thank you, 
making this thing obvious. We are full of respect.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#431185 — Re: "Black Holes" are forever a notion, never measured.

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2017-09-05 14:04 +0000
SubjectRe: "Black Holes" are forever a notion, never measured.
Message-ID<oomatf$bop$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#431074
Jeff-Relf.Me  @. writes:

>If a delusion benefits a kook, he'll go with it,
>even if he, and everyone else, knows it's a delusion.

Certainly sounds like many of your posts.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web