Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #431074 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-09-04 14:34 -0400 |
| Last post | 2017-09-05 14:04 +0000 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Take your own advice, Tom Roberts. Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2017-09-04 14:34 -0400
Re: Take your own advice, Tom Roberts. Ethel Ocallaghan <unlgclo@awlwaac.ag> - 2017-09-05 11:40 +0000
Re: "Black Holes" are forever a notion, never measured. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-05 14:04 +0000
| From | Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-04 14:34 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Take your own advice, Tom Roberts. |
| Message-ID | <Y9qdnXYxVpsbATDEnZ2dnUU7-KXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On 18/08/2017 10:30 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > A very dense objects, yes. > TRUE black holes, no. > > Black Holes violate the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle wavelength would be extremely tiny for a black hole, way less than a Planck Length. The larger an object is, the smaller its uncertainty is. So try another principle of physics which you don't understand, maybe that one will stick? http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/uncer.html Yousuf Khan -- Sent from Giganews on Thunderbird on my Toshiba laptop
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ethel Ocallaghan <unlgclo@awlwaac.ag> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-05 11:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oom2fa$16l$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #431074 |
Yousuf Khan wrote: >> Black Holes violate the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. > > The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle wavelength would be extremely tiny > for a black hole, way less than a Planck Length. The larger an object > is, the smaller its uncertainty is. So try another principle of physics > which you don't understand, maybe that one will stick? Another excellent post. What it says essentially is, that The Black Holes Theory is obsolete and deprecated. Once even the plank length gets refutable, so many weird things gonne happen. It stays actually described in the Bible. Something people can read, but not understand. Thank you, making this thing obvious. We are full of respect.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-09-05 14:04 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: "Black Holes" are forever a notion, never measured. |
| Message-ID | <oomatf$bop$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #431074 |
Jeff-Relf.Me @. writes: >If a delusion benefits a kook, he'll go with it, >even if he, and everyone else, knows it's a delusion. Certainly sounds like many of your posts.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web