Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #426473 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-28 13:47 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-08-02 16:51 +0000 |
| Articles | 11 on this page of 51 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-28 13:47 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Ernard Hevalier <adrdo@tarlaab.lr> - 2017-07-28 20:48 +0000
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-29 06:14 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 14:00 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-29 06:13 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-30 05:57 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-30 17:54 +0000
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:14 -0500
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-31 11:46 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-07-31 18:52 +0000
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:37 -0500
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-02 10:08 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-08-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 09:59 -0500
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-03 08:19 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-02 16:30 +0000
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 13:38 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-08-02 20:43 +0000
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-08-03 06:25 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-03 16:18 +0000
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-07-29 01:02 +0200
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-28 20:54 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-29 06:26 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 19:07 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-29 06:30 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Dorthy Percival <rivra@riwhte.cc> - 2017-07-29 15:39 +0000
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-29 11:44 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-29 11:58 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-07-30 00:07 +0200
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-30 01:23 +0000
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-07-30 10:34 +0000
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-07-30 13:39 +0200
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-30 17:44 +0000
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 20:52 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-30 06:06 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:16 -0500
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 20:50 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-29 22:36 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-30 06:04 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-30 01:18 +0000
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-30 06:03 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-30 13:37 +0000
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:12 -0500
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:17 -0500
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-31 11:54 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 11:00 -0500
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-08-03 06:23 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 13:01 -0500
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-03 12:01 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 12:06 -0700
Re: Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-02 16:51 +0000
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-30 06:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d281a1b6-b658-4ca4-9141-fdf55d86eebe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426573 |
On Saturday, July 29, 2017 at 9:18:13 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote: > kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: > > >The paper in the following link describes the origin of our universe according to Model Mechanics: > >http://www.modelmechаnics.org/2015universe.pdf > > Link doesn't work, Stupid Ken. The link is designed to detect moron like you and that’s why it doesn’t work for you. Normal people such as Ernard Hevalirer, find my link works just fine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-30 13:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <olknfe$lp3$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #426609 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >On Saturday, July 29, 2017 at 9:18:13 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >> >> >The paper in the following link describes the origin of our universe according to Model Mechanics: >> >http://www.modelmechаnics.org/2015universe.pdf >> >> Link doesn't work, Stupid Ken. >The link is designed to detect morons So the link only works correctly for morons? So that's why it works for you and the nymshifting troll, but nobody else!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-31 10:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <olnhdk$15ki$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #426609 |
On 7/30/17 8:03 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Saturday, July 29, 2017 at 9:18:13 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >> >>> The paper in the following link describes the origin of our universe according to Model Mechanics: >>> http://www.modelmechаnics.org/2015universe.pdf >> >> Link doesn't work, Stupid Ken. > > The link is designed to detect moron like you and that’s why it doesn’t work for you. Normal people such as Ernard Hevalirer, find my link works just fine. > Normal people like the nymshifter Ernard Hevalirer who will use that fake name for another week before abandoning it for another one? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-31 10:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <olnhlf$15ki$9@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #426473 |
On 7/28/17 3:47 PM, kenseto wrote: > The paper in the following link describes the origin of our universe according to Model Mechanics: > http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015universe.pdf > Seto starts of this essay with his approach to thinking about things, which he calls the Pyramid Technique. The Pyramid Technique is obviously nothing like the Scientific Method, and since science is pretty much defined by the use of the scientific method, Seto is therefore openly declaring that his paper has nothing to do with science. Seto may wish to claim that he has the right to reinvent science if he wishes, which is an egomaniacal delusion. All he is demonstrating is that he will forever be outside the bounds of real science, and that what he has done is some kind of paper-mache and plywood stage set meant to resemble science. Like the backdrop of a one-act play that looks something like a city street, or the white coat and clipboard that a character on a TV show might put on to play the part of a scientist. He has put up this pretense for so long that it's now too hard to drop. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-31 11:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e01846c9-1179-4cd9-a757-a5c28fab3ef0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426704 |
On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 11:17:06 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/28/17 3:47 PM, kenseto wrote: > > The paper in the following link describes the origin of our universe according to Model Mechanics: > > http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015universe.pdf > > > > Seto starts of this essay with his approach to thinking about things, > which he calls the Pyramid Technique. > > The Pyramid Technique is obviously nothing like the Scientific Method, > and since science is pretty much defined by the use of the scientific > method, Seto is therefore openly declaring that his paper has nothing to > do with science. Moron, the Pyramid Techniques a new approach to do science. It is bounded by physical observations. It does not allow non-physical mathematical concepts to explain the process of nature. > > Seto may wish to claim that he has the right to reinvent science if he > wishes, which is an egomaniacal delusion. All he is demonstrating is > that he will forever be outside the bounds of real science, and that > what he has done is some kind of paper-mache and plywood stage set meant > to resemble science. Like the backdrop of a one-act play that looks > something like a city street, or the white coat and clipboard that a > character on a TV show might put on to play the part of a scientist. > > He has put up this pretense for so long that it's now too hard to drop. > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-02 11:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <olssu5$1pa0$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #426719 |
On 7/31/17 1:54 PM, kenseto wrote: > On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 11:17:06 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 7/28/17 3:47 PM, kenseto wrote: >>> The paper in the following link describes the origin of our universe according to Model Mechanics: >>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015universe.pdf >>> >> >> Seto starts of this essay with his approach to thinking about things, >> which he calls the Pyramid Technique. >> >> The Pyramid Technique is obviously nothing like the Scientific Method, >> and since science is pretty much defined by the use of the scientific >> method, Seto is therefore openly declaring that his paper has nothing to >> do with science. > > Moron, the Pyramid Techniques a new approach to do science. Science is DEFINED by the use of the scientific method. Choose some other approach other than the scientific method, and you're no longer doing science. You can pretend to be a lot of things, and you do. But to pretend to invent science is about one of the stupidest things you're attempting. > It is bounded by physical observations. It does not allow non-physical mathematical concepts to explain the process of nature. > >> >> Seto may wish to claim that he has the right to reinvent science if he >> wishes, which is an egomaniacal delusion. All he is demonstrating is >> that he will forever be outside the bounds of real science, and that >> what he has done is some kind of paper-mache and plywood stage set meant >> to resemble science. Like the backdrop of a one-act play that looks >> something like a city street, or the white coat and clipboard that a >> character on a TV show might put on to play the part of a scientist. >> >> He has put up this pretense for so long that it's now too hard to drop. >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 06:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a9254e57-8b2b-4ae8-8cb3-d849acfee6f9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426915 |
On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 12:00:08 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/31/17 1:54 PM, kenseto wrote: > > On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 11:17:06 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 7/28/17 3:47 PM, kenseto wrote: > >>> The paper in the following link describes the origin of our universe according to Model Mechanics: > >>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015universe.pdf > >>> > >> > >> Seto starts of this essay with his approach to thinking about things, > >> which he calls the Pyramid Technique. > >> > >> The Pyramid Technique is obviously nothing like the Scientific Method, > >> and since science is pretty much defined by the use of the scientific > >> method, Seto is therefore openly declaring that his paper has nothing to > >> do with science. > > > > Moron, the Pyramid Techniques a new approach to do science. > > Science is DEFINED by the use of the scientific method. > Choose some other approach other than the scientific method, and you're > no longer doing science. You don’t even understand what science method mean.....I looked it up and you still didn’t except that definition. You are a moron woodworker and devoid of physical knowledge. > > You can pretend to be a lot of things, and you do. But to pretend to > invent science is about one of the stupidest things you're attempting. > > > It is bounded by physical observations. It does not allow non-physical mathematical concepts to explain the process of nature. > > > >> > >> Seto may wish to claim that he has the right to reinvent science if he > >> wishes, which is an egomaniacal delusion. All he is demonstrating is > >> that he will forever be outside the bounds of real science, and that > >> what he has done is some kind of paper-mache and plywood stage set meant > >> to resemble science. Like the backdrop of a one-act play that looks > >> something like a city street, or the white coat and clipboard that a > >> character on a TV show might put on to play the part of a scientist. > >> > >> He has put up this pretense for so long that it's now too hard to drop. > >> > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 13:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <olvoe7$cun$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #427032 |
On 8/3/17 8:23 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 12:00:08 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 7/31/17 1:54 PM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 11:17:06 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 7/28/17 3:47 PM, kenseto wrote: >>>>> The paper in the following link describes the origin of our universe according to Model Mechanics: >>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015universe.pdf >>>>> >>>> >>>> Seto starts of this essay with his approach to thinking about things, >>>> which he calls the Pyramid Technique. >>>> >>>> The Pyramid Technique is obviously nothing like the Scientific Method, >>>> and since science is pretty much defined by the use of the scientific >>>> method, Seto is therefore openly declaring that his paper has nothing to >>>> do with science. >>> >>> Moron, the Pyramid Techniques a new approach to do science. >> >> Science is DEFINED by the use of the scientific method. >> Choose some other approach other than the scientific method, and you're >> no longer doing science. > > You don’t even understand what science method mean. Oh, Ken, Ken. > ....I looked it up and you still didn’t except that definition. Right, because a full description of the scientific method is going to go deeper than a dictionary definition. > You are a moron woodworker and devoid of physical knowledge. Ken, I've read a whole lot more about science than you have. You have invented a costume for yourself which you like, and you CALL yourself a scientist as a result of your costume. But you're really just pretending. > > >> >> You can pretend to be a lot of things, and you do. But to pretend to >> invent science is about one of the stupidest things you're attempting. >> >>> It is bounded by physical observations. It does not allow non-physical mathematical concepts to explain the process of nature. >>> >>>> >>>> Seto may wish to claim that he has the right to reinvent science if he >>>> wishes, which is an egomaniacal delusion. All he is demonstrating is >>>> that he will forever be outside the bounds of real science, and that >>>> what he has done is some kind of paper-mache and plywood stage set meant >>>> to resemble science. Like the backdrop of a one-act play that looks >>>> something like a city street, or the white coat and clipboard that a >>>> character on a TV show might put on to play the part of a scientist. >>>> >>>> He has put up this pretense for so long that it's now too hard to drop. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 12:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <63f3bbbc-9174-4702-a22f-70f6dabad5f9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #427098 |
W dniu czwartek, 3 sierpnia 2017 20:01:46 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał: > Ken, I've read a whole lot more about science than you have. And, of course, all you've read must be true. If it wouldn't, nobody would wrote it, right, poor idiot?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-03 12:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4969458d-1a7e-4aff-a882-f4726a5cbe9a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #427032 |
On Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 9:23:20 AM UTC-4, kenseto wrote: > On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 12:00:08 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > You are a moron woodworker and devoid of physical knowledge. Idiot ken, even in his woodworking, he performs much more science than your failed attempt of at 'theory'. Plus, he makes way more $ in his woodworking than what you made with your book.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-02 16:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <olsvu6$unl$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #426719 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 11:17:06 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> Seto starts of this essay with his approach to thinking about things, >> which he calls the Pyramid Technique. >> >> The Pyramid Technique is obviously nothing like the Scientific Method, >> and since science is pretty much defined by the use of the scientific >> method, Seto is therefore openly declaring that his paper has nothing to >> do with science. >Moron, the Pyramid Techniques a new approach to do science. It is bounded >by physical observations. Stupid Ken, science is _defined_ as using the scientific method. Since it doesn't use the scientific method, your Pyramid Technique simply isn't science at all. Call it philosophy, or religion, but you can't call it science. No wonder Model Mechanics is such a failure at science, it's not even science at all!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web