Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #422344 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "HGW..." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-12 20:18 +1000 |
| Last post | 2017-06-23 21:14 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 216 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-12 20:18 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-12 15:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Selina Dieter <uiueeits@wlwtwstd.ci> - 2017-06-12 17:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-06-12 21:57 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-06-12 18:03 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-12 09:34 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 04:39 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Selina Dieter <uiueeits@wlwtwstd.ci> - 2017-06-12 18:40 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 05:26 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-12 13:57 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 05:28 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 15:14 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-13 07:17 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 15:16 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-14 08:58 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 10:45 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-14 07:26 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-14 15:00 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 11:30 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 06:15 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 15:48 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 06:54 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 15:56 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-15 01:55 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 20:54 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-15 13:01 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-16 03:41 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Kotovanich Nzerovu <ivhvruo@wovewvw.ev> - 2017-06-15 17:49 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-16 04:28 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 16:44 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? Nými Icelulózy <ejienm@wzsfwe.ul> - 2017-06-16 11:28 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Nými Icelulózy <ejienm@wzsfwe.ul> - 2017-06-16 18:27 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 16:37 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 07:23 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 07:21 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-15 07:25 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 10:24 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:08 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:23 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:28 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:37 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 15:25 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 15:02 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-17 07:35 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-17 11:48 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-17 12:03 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-17 22:21 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-18 04:27 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-06-18 13:52 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-19 05:09 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Rhett Doucet <ttdh@etoe.ee> - 2017-06-19 12:42 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-06-19 17:26 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 12:32 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-19 05:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-19 12:38 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 13:03 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-19 11:24 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 13:30 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-21 06:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:08 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-22 07:45 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 15:28 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-24 05:46 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-24 17:05 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-24 15:49 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 16:06 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-05 02:50 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-07-04 22:58 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-07-05 20:22 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-05 11:08 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-05 11:06 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-05 04:26 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-06 13:19 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-05 11:05 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-05 04:20 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 12:44 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-19 11:25 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-19 20:26 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 16:12 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-21 06:23 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:10 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-22 09:00 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-22 01:16 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 15:29 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-22 01:56 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 12:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-22 05:49 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-22 06:54 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-22 15:58 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-23 09:30 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-06-23 09:18 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-23 23:34 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-25 09:26 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-25 00:55 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Julianna Eliason <nujasenea@wiwnwajau.nc> - 2017-06-18 14:20 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-18 08:45 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Julianna Eliason <nujasenea@wiwnwajau.nc> - 2017-06-18 15:47 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-18 16:10 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-18 16:08 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Julianna Eliason <nujasenea@wiwnwajau.nc> - 2017-06-18 16:54 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-18 03:15 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Nými Icelulózy <ejienm@wzsfwe.ul> - 2017-06-16 13:52 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-15 07:21 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 10:23 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:05 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:21 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 15:44 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 11:14 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:23 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:26 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-16 08:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-17 15:02 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-17 11:56 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-14 09:21 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-14 07:12 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 06:34 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 10:17 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 23:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:49 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-16 00:57 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:51 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 23:59 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-15 08:23 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-14 18:50 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:38 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-17 08:25 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 02:10 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 07:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-18 08:53 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-18 05:52 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-18 14:50 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-19 09:48 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-19 01:42 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-19 19:33 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-19 19:45 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-20 08:14 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-20 08:42 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-21 14:37 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-21 19:18 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-22 08:15 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 15:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 21:18 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-22 03:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-23 07:00 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 02:16 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 20:07 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 20:39 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 10:19 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-26 12:12 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 13:21 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-27 19:58 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:39 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-27 16:25 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 13:01 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-27 11:53 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:35 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-27 13:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:38 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-28 03:54 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 19:35 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-04 00:04 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-28 09:48 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-28 13:54 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-29 00:46 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-30 09:04 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-30 23:17 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-31 10:40 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:08 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-01 09:57 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 03:11 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-02 08:31 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-08-02 09:04 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 11:00 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-03 07:15 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 10:27 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-04 11:48 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 02:34 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 09:01 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 14:42 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-01 03:02 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 13:57 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-01 10:43 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-01 09:56 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:08 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:33 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-22 02:49 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 08:43 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 19:46 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 02:12 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 02:14 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 10:41 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:27 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 09:05 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-16 21:39 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-16 22:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-17 00:08 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 08:00 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-17 09:39 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-18 21:18 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 14:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 19:16 -0400
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-21 12:59 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 07:51 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 07:45 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-17 20:02 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-17 20:19 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-20 11:39 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Lipek Mniak <iluka@sskwpiw.pp> - 2017-06-21 11:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-21 23:10 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-21 06:28 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:06 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-22 07:50 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-24 11:11 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-23 21:14 -0700
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
| From | shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-31 14:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <483afc52-3307-45c7-8563-4ab69c6086db@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426690 |
Bodkin wrote:
> - Insist that the product of two negative
> numbers must be a negative number.
This has already been addressed, and importantly, by a guy who has an IQ score twenty points higher than Einstein's.
http://www.symmetrymath.org/jack-kuykendall.html
So there.
---Tim Shuba---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-01 03:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a89307f9-8abd-4222-a219-ca3f8d157b22@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426728 |
On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 3:42:33 PM UTC-6, shuba wrote: > > Bodkin wrote: > > > > - Insist that the product of two negative > > numbers must be a negative number. > > This has already been addressed, and importantly, by a guy who has an IQ > score twenty points higher than Einstein's. > > http://www.symmetrymath.org/jack-kuykendall.html > > So there. > > > ---Tim Shuba--- Who says he has a higher IQ? :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-01 13:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <olq1ch$lab$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #426789 |
Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> writes: >On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 3:42:33 PM UTC-6, shuba wrote: >> >> This has already been addressed, and importantly, by a guy who has an IQ >> score twenty points higher than Einstein's. >> So there. >Who says he has a higher IQ? :-) He says he has a higher IQ. Since he has a higher IQ, his claim of having a higher IQ must be correct, right? What's that you say, that's illogical?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-01 10:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <898798c7-f50b-487c-9a53-96776f320cef@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426811 |
On Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 7:57:39 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> writes: > > > > On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 3:42:33 PM UTC-6, shuba wrote: > > > > > > This has already been addressed, and importantly, by a guy who has an IQ > > > score twenty points higher than Einstein's. > > > > > > So there. > > > Who says he has a higher IQ? :-) > > He says he has a higher IQ. > Since he has a higher IQ, his claim of having a higher IQ must be correct, > right? What's that you say, that's illogical? So, is he going to have his own TV action drama? Will he call it Sagitarius?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "HGW..." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-01 09:56 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <olog38$sqm$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #426690 |
On 01/08/17 00:01, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/27/17 6:48 PM, HGW... wrote: >> Don't lie, Bodkin. You are a willing participant in hte Grand >> Conspiracy to keep the name Einstein as the world's symbol of genius. > > Oh, come now. I believe the only one here who speaks about Einstein as a > paramount symbol of genius is you, and you make yourself > > Einstein did some amazing things, but frankly, he's no higher than John > Bardeen or Richard Feynman or John von Neumann or Enrico Fermi or a > half-dozen others I could quickly name. I would say he is no higher than any of the other used car dealers along Parramatta road. >> Here is a list of 'eminent' people who spread the word that Jesus >> Christ was the son of a god thing and his mother was never screwed by >> his father. Is it right to go along with them just because half a >> billion ignorant fools do? > > If your aim is simply to be contrarian, then go all the way, Henry. Here > are some suggestions: <Bodkin's self-flagellation snipped>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-02 10:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <olspu4$1k3l$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #426748 |
On 7/31/17 6:56 PM, HGW... wrote: > On 01/08/17 00:01, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 7/27/17 6:48 PM, HGW... wrote: > >>> Don't lie, Bodkin. You are a willing participant in hte Grand >>> Conspiracy to keep the name Einstein as the world's symbol of genius. >> >> Oh, come now. I believe the only one here who speaks about Einstein as >> a paramount symbol of genius is you, and you make yourself >> Einstein did some amazing things, but frankly, he's no higher than >> John Bardeen or Richard Feynman or John von Neumann or Enrico Fermi or >> a half-dozen others I could quickly name. > > I would say he is no higher than any of the other used car dealers along > Parramatta road. Well, I don't think any of the people mentioned sold used cars. But neither is he the "world's symbol of genius" that you are reacting so violently against. So it seems you're at war with your yourself about this. > >>> Here is a list of 'eminent' people who spread the word that Jesus >>> Christ was the son of a god thing and his mother was never screwed by >>> his father. Is it right to go along with them just because half a >>> billion ignorant fools do? >> >> If your aim is simply to be contrarian, then go all the way, Henry. >> Here are some suggestions: > <Bodkin's self-flagellation snipped> -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-27 19:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d51de498-cd51-466a-81ba-cb11e2b94c23@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426335 |
On Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 11:53:19 AM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > W dniu czwartek, 27 lipca 2017 18:25:47 UTC+2 użytkownik Michael Moroney napisał: > > > > > > Yes, despite being a craftsman, not a scientist, he's surprisingly quite > > good at physics. > > Oh, yes, he is perfect. He waves arms, he > screams "whoever doesn't believe our guru > is stupid!"... as if he was a real physicist. No, he posts actual arguments. You never do, you just scream, just like you did above. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-22 02:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okuees$au9$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #425787 |
"HGW..." <hgw@....> writes: >On 22/07/17 05:18, Michael Moron=y wrote: > We know that Odd Bodkin is a pseudonym and >> we don't know what his actual name is. >It is Paul Draper. Oh yeah, that's right. Every kook here thinks that every non-kook is Paul Draper. But tell us, Ralph, who is this Henry Wilson physicist guy you pretend to be? Obviously, Mr. Wilson, if real, never posts here, since there has never been any actual physics posted by anyone using the name Henry Wilson. So who is he, Ralph? Ralph, does he know you are besmirching his name here?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-23 08:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b25f844b-d647-414d-a0fb-f1ce47128bca@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425454 |
kenseto wrote:
> Assertions are not valid argument.
Gourmet puppy chow, Ken. You were at the peak of your argumentation skills in the good old days of gourmet puppy chow. It sure would be nice to see you bring it back.
---Tim Shuba---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-14 19:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f79599b5-e2e8-4252-8339-8bff5059ddbe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #424816 |
Gehan wrote:
> I do not have the expertise to evaluate your theory
Sure you do. Only a complete idiot would take Ken Seto's pretend physics seriously, and you have literally years of expertise at being a complete idiot.
> Have you got your theory peer-reviewed for the mathematics?
When it comes to mathematics, Seto is peerless.
> What experimental results does it predict?
All of them. No exceptions.
---Tim Shuba---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-15 02:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f4a0eaa1-2fea-4527-8fe2-0ce7b8e58b4a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #424957 |
On Saturday, July 15, 2017 at 8:16:57 AM UTC+5:30, shuba wrote: > Gehan wrote: > > > I do not have the expertise to evaluate your theory > > Sure you do. Only a complete idiot would take Ken Seto's pretend physics seriously, and you have literally years of expertise at being a complete idiot. > > > Have you got your theory peer-reviewed for the mathematics? > > When it comes to mathematics, Seto is peerless. > > > What experimental results does it predict? > > All of them. No exceptions. > > > ---Tim Shuba--- A complete idiot will not know either way. I suggest Ken Seto's and Wilson's papers which I find very helpful by the way, be used to test students of relativity. Henry Wilson has pointed out several facts that on the face of it sound absurd, like light slowing down when travelling through interstellar dust, and the path of a ray of light in the light clock along with useful graphical animations- this was more than 10 years ago, to be sure. I can only work within my knowledge space, like everyone else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-15 02:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fa1108a8-ccde-4e53-8445-e070f958d20d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #424988 |
On Saturday, July 15, 2017 at 2:42:53 PM UTC+5:30, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, July 15, 2017 at 8:16:57 AM UTC+5:30, shuba wrote: > > Gehan wrote: > > > > > I do not have the expertise to evaluate your theory > > > > Sure you do. Only a complete idiot would take Ken Seto's pretend physics seriously, and you have literally years of expertise at being a complete idiot. > > > > > Have you got your theory peer-reviewed for the mathematics? > > > > When it comes to mathematics, Seto is peerless. > > > > > What experimental results does it predict? > > > > All of them. No exceptions. > > > > > > ---Tim Shuba--- > > A complete idiot will not know either way. I suggest Ken Seto's and Wilson's papers which I find very helpful by the way, be used to test students of relativity. Henry Wilson has pointed out several facts that on the face of it sound absurd, like light slowing down when travelling through interstellar dust, and the path of a ray of light in the light clock along with useful graphical animations- this was more than 10 years ago, to be sure. > > I can only work within my knowledge space, like everyone else. Ok and I just pointed out that some relativty texts are in error, according to Roberts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-15 10:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okcrg5$jst$9@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #424989 |
gehan.ameresekere wrote: >> I can only work within my knowledge space, like everyone else. > > Ok and I just pointed out that some relativty texts are in error, > according to Roberts. Never in error, once you know what is going on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-15 08:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bad01aa9-f2ef-433e-bfa2-50c574da9823@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #424957 |
On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 10:46:57 PM UTC-4, shuba wrote: > Gehan wrote: > > > I do not have the expertise to evaluate your theory > > Sure you do. Only a complete idiot would take Ken Seto’s pretend physics seriously, and you have literally years of expertise at being a complete idiot. Shuba is one of those low intelligent people in this NG. All he does is hand- waving. He has no idea the intricacy involved in my theory. > > > Have you got your theory peer-reviewed for the mathematics? > > When it comes to mathematics, Seto is peerless. > > > What experimental results does it predict? > > All of them. No exceptions. > > > ---Tim Shuba---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-15 09:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bd50aed6-2f53-4bfa-bf84-fb9249d97e9d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #424816 |
On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 2:59:23 AM UTC-4, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 7:47:16 PM UTC+5:30, kenseto wrote: > > On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 6:18:33 AM UTC-4, HGW... wrote: > > > Maybe he died. Maybe he has changed his nickname because he was so > > > ashamed of his theory. > > > > I am tired of the low level of the intelligence that exists in this NG. I published a new book of the universe (http://www.modelmechanics.org/2016ibook.pdf) that includes the following items......no body in this NG bothers to give any intelligent comment: > > > > _ It offers a realistic origin of the universe. > > _ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. > > _ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. > > _ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature. > > _ It can be validated experimentally. > > _ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). > > _ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG) > > _ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity as subsets. > > _ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. > > _ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. > > _ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. > > _ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum experiments. > > _ It explains the structures of atoms. > > Intriguing. Several comments: > > 1. I do not have the expertise to evaluate your theory > 2. There are several possible objections to the theory: > > a) Philosophical objections Can you describe the philosophical objections? > b) Objections based on mathematical inconsistencies What are the mathematical inconsistencies? The math of IRT is the LT in different forms. > c) Objections based on logic I think that Model Mechanics is more logical than current theories. It does not rely on the existence non-existing of mathematical objects or processes such as extra dimensions, length contraction, virtual particles.....etc. > d) Objects based on negative experimental results. I have no idea what you are talking about here. > > In my opinion, you do not have to worry about (a), or (c). Previous theories have survived without these problems. > > Have you got your theory peer-reviewed for the mathematics? What experimental results does it predict? Read Chapter 5 of my book. Model Mechanics provide logical explanations for the following past famous experiments: 1. The photoelectric experiment. 2. The Compton shift experiment. 3. The double-slit experiment. In addition New experiments to detect absolute motion are proposed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 21:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1e7de7de-bb69-422a-9151-283071bd1913@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425039 |
On Saturday, July 15, 2017 at 9:35:37 PM UTC+5:30, kenseto wrote: > On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 2:59:23 AM UTC-4, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 7:47:16 PM UTC+5:30, kenseto wrote: > > > On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 6:18:33 AM UTC-4, HGW... wrote: > > > > Maybe he died. Maybe he has changed his nickname because he was so > > > > ashamed of his theory. > > > > > > I am tired of the low level of the intelligence that exists in this NG. I published a new book of the universe (http://www.modelmechanics.org/2016ibook.pdf) that includes the following items......no body in this NG bothers to give any intelligent comment: > > > > > > _ It offers a realistic origin of the universe. > > > _ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. > > > _ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. > > > _ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature. > > > _ It can be validated experimentally. > > > _ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). > > > _ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG) > > > _ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity as subsets. > > > _ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. > > > _ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. > > > _ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. > > > _ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum experiments. > > > _ It explains the structures of atoms. > > > > Intriguing. Several comments: > > > > 1. I do not have the expertise to evaluate your theory > > 2. There are several possible objections to the theory: > > > > a) Philosophical objections > > Can you describe the philosophical objections? > > > b) Objections based on mathematical inconsistencies > > What are the mathematical inconsistencies? The math of IRT is the LT in different forms. > > > c) Objections based on logic > > I think that Model Mechanics is more logical than current theories. It does not rely on the existence non-existing of mathematical objects or processes such as extra dimensions, length contraction, virtual particles.....etc. > > > d) Objects based on negative experimental results. > > I have no idea what you are talking about here. > > > > In my opinion, you do not have to worry about (a), or (c). Previous theories have survived without these problems. > > > > Have you got your theory peer-reviewed for the mathematics? What experimental results does it predict? > > Read Chapter 5 of my book. Model Mechanics provide logical explanations for the following past famous experiments: > 1. The photoelectric experiment. > 2. The Compton shift experiment. > 3. The double-slit experiment. > > In addition New experiments to detect absolute motion are proposed. Will read chapter 5. In the meantime post one review from a kind mainstream scientist?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 22:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <53e976a5-268d-4bae-a26c-84d59351da2a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425258 |
On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 9:39:21 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com asked: > ...In the meantime post one review from a kind mainstream scientist? Don't hold your breath, there aren't any, and there won't be any...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 00:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fb20d8f2-4723-493a-93bc-9f0e99884ba8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425265 |
On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 10:46:31 AM UTC+5:30, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 9:39:21 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com asked: > > > ...In the meantime post one review from a kind mainstream scientist? > > Don't hold your breath, there aren't any, and there won't be any... Why not, I mean someone could at least look at it and point out its errors (if any) . It will be a learning experience. Also, chapter 5 describes an experiment to test the theory. At least criticize the experiment.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 08:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6a9fd3f0-2c3a-48f9-86e3-0dd7766b0eec@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425277 |
On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 3:08:49 AM UTC-4, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 10:46:31 AM UTC+5:30, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 9:39:21 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com asked: > > > > > ...In the meantime post one review from a kind mainstream scientist? > > > > Don't hold your breath, there aren't any, and there won't be any... > > Why not, I mean someone could at least look at it and point out its errors (if any) . It will be a learning experience. Also, chapter 5 describes an experiment to test the theory. At least criticize the experiment. Scientists refuse to comment because of the following reasons: 1. Embarrassment 2. Don’t rock the gravy boat. 3. Money. 4. Afraid that it will catch on and spread like wild fire. You can bet that scientists would point out any major flaws if they find any.....they can’t and that’s why the silence.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 09:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <654a8638-b862-439d-b929-05fee984ae91@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425308 |
On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 9:00:15 AM UTC-6, kenseto wrote: > > Scientists refuse to comment because of the following reasons: > 1. Embarrassment Yes, I'm embarrassed to even respond to this pile of bull plop. > 2. Don’t rock the gravy boat. > 3. Money. Baloney! > 4. Afraid that it will catch on and spread like wild fire. Only if the whole world becomes zombified. > You can bet that scientists would point out any major flaws if they find > any.....they can’t and that’s why the silence. More baloney. The fact is that no scientist would waste his time. This is because such trash is beneath them. http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015irt.pdf "Einstein derived the same LT as LET from these two postulates." About the only truthful statement in there. "The concept of flexible time and geometric projected length contraction were introduced to explain the LT equations." The LT doesn't need "explaining, and TD and LC are built right in. "However, the idea of flexible time and projected length contraction gives rise to many paradoxes and the most famous of these is the familiar twin paradox." There are no true paradoxes. The rest of the paper is yammering nonsense. "Your manuscript is both good and original; but the part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not good." -- Samuel Johnson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web