Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #425054 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-15 18:57 +0000 |
| Last post | 2017-07-22 17:58 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 148 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 18:57 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 19:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 19:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 20:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 00:49 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-17 22:34 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:53 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:49 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-07-16 12:24 +1000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-16 11:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-16 11:18 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-16 12:35 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 10:07 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:09 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 13:24 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 19:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 18:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:48 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:56 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:50 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-17 22:37 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 13:26 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:09 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:51 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:01 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 14:33 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 20:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 23:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:03 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:23 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 00:00 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:04 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:03 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 12:38 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:44 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 12:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:54 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:25 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 21:19 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:22 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 16:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 17:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 15:36 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 21:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-19 20:21 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:32 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 16:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:58 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:52 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:49 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 19:13 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:03 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:53 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:53 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:57 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-07-16 20:35 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-07-16 21:19 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 19:30 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 02:02 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 02:02 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:21 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:17 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 15:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:09 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:58 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:01 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:33 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:04 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 19:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 17:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:19 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:41 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:34 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:05 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-17 22:06 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 18:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:27 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:58 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:26 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:47 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 17:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:43 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:35 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:06 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:15 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 00:02 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:35 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:04 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:15 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 21:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 21:23 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 03:42 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 11:29 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 17:27 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 19:17 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 00:15 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 21:20 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 01:41 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 09:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 21:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:13 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 05:49 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 15:26 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 12:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:10 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 18:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 15:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 19:32 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 22:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-22 10:51 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 17:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 17:58 -0500
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 10:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okimno$1854$7@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425313 |
On 7/17/2017 10:14 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Serg io wrote: > >>> Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. They use silver as a title, you need to >>> look into the datasheet, as always. To see the characteristics, >>> tolerance etc. More than likely plated with something else. Air and >>> water kills silver in no time. Basic things. >> >> it is silver, probably 90%, some hardener, and corrosion does not hurt > > You have to look into the datasheet for the specs etc. These morons are > incapable to read datasheets and believe all taken from the frontpage. > plating content never mentioned on datasheets.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 02:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okh5r6$a9a$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #425209 |
The nymshifter, posting as Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> writes: >Paul B. Andersen wrote: >> Den 16.07.2017 20.40, skrev Winfred Plumer: >>> I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry. >>> >> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-2.html >> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-1.html >> http://www.hbrindustries.com/coil-types >> https://www.labkings.com/rf-coil/rf-coil-silver-pe.html >> https://www.meinhard.com/index.cfm/category/421/rf-coils.cfm >> http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec22-asx/hookup-86.php >> http://www.tempoelectric.com/cables.htm >> https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html >> http://www.precisionglassblowing.com/product/agilent-7500-rf-coil-silver/ >> http://www.analyticalwest.com/products/icp-oes/icp-oes-jobin-yvon/load- >coil/rf-coil-silver.html >Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. Stupid nymshifter, at least one of the sites mentioned (https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html) explicitly states pure silver for some of the listed items. While silver does tarnish in air, it's not a big deal, seal it if necessary. Old wire wrap circuits sometimes used silver wire wrap wire. I was talking with someone who once worked in an electric light switch factory, he mentioned how the switches were made with silver contacts and when the plant was closed down some of the workers made off with some of the silver still in the machinery.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 02:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596c52db$0$60308$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425248 |
On 07/16/2017 10:02 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > The nymshifter, posting as Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> writes: > >> Paul B. Andersen wrote: > >>> Den 16.07.2017 20.40, skrev Winfred Plumer: >>>> I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry. >>>> >>> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-2.html >>> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-1.html >>> http://www.hbrindustries.com/coil-types >>> https://www.labkings.com/rf-coil/rf-coil-silver-pe.html >>> https://www.meinhard.com/index.cfm/category/421/rf-coils.cfm >>> http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec22-asx/hookup-86.php >>> http://www.tempoelectric.com/cables.htm >>> https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html >>> http://www.precisionglassblowing.com/product/agilent-7500-rf-coil-silver/ >>> http://www.analyticalwest.com/products/icp-oes/icp-oes-jobin-yvon/load- >> coil/rf-coil-silver.html > >> Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. > > Stupid nymshifter, at least one of the sites mentioned > (https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html) explicitly > states pure silver for some of the listed items. While silver does > tarnish in air, it's not a big deal, seal it if necessary. > > Old wire wrap circuits sometimes used silver wire wrap wire. > > I was talking with someone who once worked in an electric light switch > factory, he mentioned how the switches were made with silver contacts > and when the plant was closed down some of the workers made off with some > of the silver still in the machinery. > Silver is still today one of the choices a buyer can make for the material in switch contacts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 15:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okikkv$11ho$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425274 |
benj wrote: > On 07/16/2017 10:02 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: >> I was talking with someone who once worked in an electric light switch >> factory, he mentioned how the switches were made with silver contacts >> and when the plant was closed down some of the workers made off with >> some of the silver still in the machinery. >> > Silver is still today one of the choices a buyer can make for the > material in switch contacts. Among you two stupid, benj and morony, plus jimp, serg is the smartest of you four. lol, so true indeed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 10:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okimtt$19g1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425315 |
On 7/17/2017 10:21 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > benj wrote: > >> On 07/16/2017 10:02 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: >>> I was talking with someone who once worked in an electric light switch >>> factory, he mentioned how the switches were made with silver contacts >>> and when the plant was closed down some of the workers made off with >>> some of the silver still in the machinery. >>> >> Silver is still today one of the choices a buyer can make for the >> material in switch contacts. > > Among you two stupid, benj and morony, plus jimp, serg is the smartest of > you four. lol, so true indeed. > we cannot win the race to the bottom, Hillary and Trump already morons been there, the stupider you are, the more electable you are, watch "Being There" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEb6fxpbcDo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 15:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okikej$11ho$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425248 |
Michael Moroney wrote: > The nymshifter, posting as Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> writes: >>Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. > > Stupid nymshifter, at least one of the sites mentioned > (https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html) > explicitly states pure silver for some of the listed items. While > silver does tarnish in air, it's not a big deal, seal it if necessary. What part of the reading datasheet for the product you don't understand, cretin. The discussion was about the silver in electronics, its performance and conductivity. The conductivity of Alloys of silver is NOT the conductivity of silver. YOu are an incompetent pos. Severely uneducated.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 15:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okimm2$qc0$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #425314 |
The nymshifter, posting as Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> writes: >Michael Moroney wrote: >> The nymshifter, posting as Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> writes: > >>>Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. >> >> Stupid nymshifter, at least one of the sites mentioned >> (https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html) >> explicitly states pure silver for some of the listed items. While >> silver does tarnish in air, it's not a big deal, seal it if necessary. >What part of the reading datasheet for the product you don't understand, >cretin. The discussion was about the silver in electronics, its >performance and conductivity. The conductivity of Alloys of silver is NOT >the conductivity of silver. YOu are an incompetent pos. Severely >uneducated. What part of the phrase "pure silver" don't YOU understand, nymshifter? That website explicitly stated "pure silver", which means pure silver, not a silver alloy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 11:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okin0v$19g1$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425314 |
On 7/17/2017 10:17 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Michael Moroney wrote: > >> The nymshifter, posting as Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> writes: > >>> Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. >> >> Stupid nymshifter, at least one of the sites mentioned >> (https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html) >> explicitly states pure silver for some of the listed items. While >> silver does tarnish in air, it's not a big deal, seal it if necessary. > > What part of the reading datasheet for the product you don't understand, > cretin. The discussion was about the silver in electronics, its > performance and conductivity. The conductivity of Alloys of silver is NOT > the conductivity of silver. YOu are an incompetent pos. Severely > uneducated. > wrong, if your alloy is 99% silver, the conductivity will be 99% or greater.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 16:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okinfu$11ho$18@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425336 |
Serg io wrote: > wrong, if your alloy is 99% silver, the conductivity will be 99% or > greater. Noo, it deteriorates drastic. That's why you need to look into the datasheet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 11:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okiqb8$1f19$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425345 |
On 7/17/2017 11:09 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Serg io wrote: > >> wrong, if your alloy is 99% silver, the conductivity will be 99% or >> greater. > > Noo, it deteriorates drastic. That's why you need to look into the > datasheet. > nope. I've had silver plated RF connectors for 20 years, slight tarnish, does not effect performance at all. the oxcide layer protects it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 01:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596c44c3$0$32229$b1db1813$145976f0@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425209 |
On 07/16/2017 03:30 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Paul B. Andersen wrote: > >> Den 16.07.2017 20.40, skrev Winfred Plumer: >>> I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry. >>> >> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-2.html >> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-1.html >> http://www.hbrindustries.com/coil-types >> https://www.labkings.com/rf-coil/rf-coil-silver-pe.html >> https://www.meinhard.com/index.cfm/category/421/rf-coils.cfm >> http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec22-asx/hookup-86.php >> http://www.tempoelectric.com/cables.htm >> https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html >> http://www.precisionglassblowing.com/product/agilent-7500-rf-coil-silver/ >> http://www.analyticalwest.com/products/icp-oes/icp-oes-jobin-yvon/load- > coil/rf-coil-silver.html > > Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. They use silver as a title, you need to > look into the datasheet, as always. To see the characteristics, tolerance > etc. More than likely plated with something else. Air and water kills > silver in no time. Basic things. > Yeah, they don't mean "silver plated" they mean plated with something silver colored. (Are we still allowed to use the word "colored"?) I never thought I see the day when someone showed up here dumber than Bert, Archiepoo and Chimp, but you win the grand prize.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 15:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okikmn$11ho$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425267 |
benj wrote: >> Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. They use silver as a title, you need to >> look into the datasheet, as always. To see the characteristics, >> tolerance etc. More than likely plated with something else. Air and >> water kills silver in no time. Basic things. >> > Yeah, they don't mean "silver plated" they mean plated with something > silver colored. (Are we still allowed to use the word "colored"?) Go away, you are too stupid to say anything.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 01:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596c4f08$0$53044$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425196 |
On 07/16/2017 02:40 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Paul B. Andersen wrote: > >> Because of the skin effect, RF coils are very often made of silver >> plated copper wire. >> And wave-guides for microwave frequencies are almost always silver >> plated on the inside. > > You forgot a lay of protection over, and is not pure silver, but whatever > concentration alloy. I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry. > obviously if you doubt it, it can't possibly be true. The protective coating on silver is silver oxide you dumb shit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 15:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okilc3$11ho$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425270 |
benj wrote: >> You forgot a lay of protection over, and is not pure silver, but >> whatever concentration alloy. I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in >> circuitry. >> > obviously if you doubt it, it can't possibly be true. The protective > coating on silver is silver oxide you dumb shit. You don't know idiot, there are a few kinds of silver oxide. But you lost focus, it is not about that. In electronic IC fabrication, nano-tech silver is not used, but gold.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 11:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okin5i$19g1$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425317 |
On 7/17/2017 10:33 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > benj wrote: > >>> You forgot a lay of protection over, and is not pure silver, but >>> whatever concentration alloy. I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in >>> circuitry. >>> >> obviously if you doubt it, it can't possibly be true. The protective >> coating on silver is silver oxide you dumb shit. > > You don't know idiot, there are a few kinds of silver oxide. But you lost > focus, it is not about that. In electronic IC fabrication, nano-tech > silver is not used, but gold. > got URL ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 19:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <66rs3e-o38.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #425192 |
In sci.physics Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: > Den 16.07.2017 14.35, skrev Michael Moroney: >> The nymshifting troll, posting as Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> writes: >> >>> Silver is strict avoided in electronics also because the capacitance and >>> induction induced in circuitry by that corrosion. Use your brain before >>> you post, lady mam. >> >> Admit it, nymshifter, you got caught in a mistake. Copper corrodes even >> worse than silver, yet it is used all over the place. The reason for that >> is because silver is simply too expensive compared to copper. Gold is an >> even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used only where its >> superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >> > > Because of the skin effect, RF coils are very often made > of silver plated copper wire. > And wave-guides for microwave frequencies are almost always > silver plated on the inside. Next he will claim the plating is silver alloy (cough). -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 20:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okgh94$1ksi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425211 |
jimp wrote: >> Because of the skin effect, RF coils are very often made of silver >> plated copper wire. >> And wave-guides for microwave frequencies are almost always silver >> plated on the inside. > > Next he will claim the plating is silver alloy (cough). You seemingly are totally uneducated to know anything about wave-guides. When did you last time modelled such one, zzZZzzz.. never.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 17:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okgnmv$9qh$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425215 |
On 7/16/2017 3:11 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > jimp wrote: > >>> Because of the skin effect, RF coils are very often made of silver >>> plated copper wire. >>> And wave-guides for microwave frequencies are almost always silver >>> plated on the inside. >> >> Next he will claim the plating is silver alloy (cough). > > You seemingly are totally uneducated to know anything about wave-guides. > When did you last time modelled such one, zzZZzzz.. never. > want to buy some waveguide, silver plated inside ? I have some for sale.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 22:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3c5t3e-t59.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #425227 |
In sci.physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 7/16/2017 3:11 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >> jimp wrote: >> >>>> Because of the skin effect, RF coils are very often made of silver >>>> plated copper wire. >>>> And wave-guides for microwave frequencies are almost always silver >>>> plated on the inside. >>> >>> Next he will claim the plating is silver alloy (cough). >> >> You seemingly are totally uneducated to know anything about wave-guides. >> When did you last time modelled such one, zzZZzzz.. never. >> > > want to buy some waveguide, silver plated inside ? I have some for sale. What band, what configuration, and how much? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 01:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596c46dc$0$18977$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425227 |
On 07/16/2017 06:01 PM, Serg io wrote: > On 7/16/2017 3:11 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >> jimp wrote: >> >>>> Because of the skin effect, RF coils are very often made of silver >>>> plated copper wire. >>>> And wave-guides for microwave frequencies are almost always silver >>>> plated on the inside. >>> >>> Next he will claim the plating is silver alloy (cough). >> >> You seemingly are totally uneducated to know anything about wave-guides. >> When did you last time modelled such one, zzZZzzz.. never. >> > > want to buy some waveguide, silver plated inside ? I have some for sale. Feh! Silver-colored alloy! Worthless! :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web