Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #422344 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "HGW..." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-12 20:18 +1000 |
| Last post | 2017-06-23 21:14 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 216 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-12 20:18 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-12 15:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Selina Dieter <uiueeits@wlwtwstd.ci> - 2017-06-12 17:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-06-12 21:57 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-06-12 18:03 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-12 09:34 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 04:39 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Selina Dieter <uiueeits@wlwtwstd.ci> - 2017-06-12 18:40 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 05:26 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-12 13:57 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 05:28 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 15:14 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-13 07:17 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 15:16 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-14 08:58 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 10:45 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-14 07:26 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-14 15:00 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 11:30 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 06:15 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 15:48 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 06:54 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 15:56 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-15 01:55 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 20:54 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-15 13:01 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-16 03:41 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Kotovanich Nzerovu <ivhvruo@wovewvw.ev> - 2017-06-15 17:49 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-16 04:28 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 16:44 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? Nými Icelulózy <ejienm@wzsfwe.ul> - 2017-06-16 11:28 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Nými Icelulózy <ejienm@wzsfwe.ul> - 2017-06-16 18:27 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 16:37 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 07:23 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 07:21 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-15 07:25 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 10:24 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:08 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:23 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:28 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:37 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 15:25 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 15:02 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-17 07:35 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-17 11:48 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-17 12:03 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-17 22:21 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-18 04:27 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-06-18 13:52 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-19 05:09 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Rhett Doucet <ttdh@etoe.ee> - 2017-06-19 12:42 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-06-19 17:26 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 12:32 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-19 05:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-19 12:38 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 13:03 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-19 11:24 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 13:30 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-21 06:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:08 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-22 07:45 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 15:28 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-24 05:46 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-24 17:05 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-24 15:49 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 16:06 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-05 02:50 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-07-04 22:58 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-07-05 20:22 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-05 11:08 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-05 11:06 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-05 04:26 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-06 13:19 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-05 11:05 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-05 04:20 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 12:44 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-19 11:25 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-19 20:26 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 16:12 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-21 06:23 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:10 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-22 09:00 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-22 01:16 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 15:29 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-22 01:56 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 12:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-22 05:49 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-22 06:54 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-22 15:58 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-23 09:30 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-06-23 09:18 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-23 23:34 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-25 09:26 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-25 00:55 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Julianna Eliason <nujasenea@wiwnwajau.nc> - 2017-06-18 14:20 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-18 08:45 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Julianna Eliason <nujasenea@wiwnwajau.nc> - 2017-06-18 15:47 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-18 16:10 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-18 16:08 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Julianna Eliason <nujasenea@wiwnwajau.nc> - 2017-06-18 16:54 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-18 03:15 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Nými Icelulózy <ejienm@wzsfwe.ul> - 2017-06-16 13:52 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-15 07:21 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 10:23 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:05 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:21 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 15:44 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 11:14 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:23 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:26 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-16 08:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-17 15:02 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-17 11:56 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-14 09:21 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-14 07:12 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 06:34 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 10:17 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 23:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:49 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-16 00:57 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:51 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 23:59 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-15 08:23 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-14 18:50 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:38 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-17 08:25 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 02:10 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 07:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-18 08:53 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-18 05:52 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-18 14:50 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-19 09:48 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-19 01:42 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-19 19:33 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-19 19:45 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-20 08:14 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-20 08:42 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-21 14:37 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-21 19:18 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-22 08:15 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 15:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 21:18 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-22 03:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-23 07:00 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 02:16 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 20:07 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 20:39 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 10:19 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-26 12:12 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 13:21 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-27 19:58 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:39 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-27 16:25 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 13:01 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-27 11:53 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:35 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-27 13:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:38 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-28 03:54 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 19:35 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-04 00:04 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-28 09:48 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-28 13:54 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-29 00:46 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-30 09:04 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-30 23:17 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-31 10:40 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:08 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-01 09:57 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 03:11 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-02 08:31 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-08-02 09:04 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 11:00 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-03 07:15 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 10:27 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-04 11:48 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 02:34 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 09:01 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 14:42 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-01 03:02 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 13:57 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-01 10:43 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-01 09:56 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:08 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:33 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-22 02:49 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 08:43 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 19:46 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 02:12 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 02:14 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 10:41 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:27 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 09:05 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-16 21:39 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-16 22:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-17 00:08 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 08:00 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-17 09:39 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-18 21:18 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 14:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 19:16 -0400
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-21 12:59 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 07:51 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 07:45 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-17 20:02 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-17 20:19 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-20 11:39 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Lipek Mniak <iluka@sskwpiw.pp> - 2017-06-21 11:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-21 23:10 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-21 06:28 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:06 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-22 07:50 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-24 11:11 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-23 21:14 -0700
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-21 11:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oie5mo$k21$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #423181 |
On 6/21/17 8:16 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 2:30:39 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 6/19/17 1:24 PM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 2:03:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 6/19/17 7:16 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:32:03 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 6:21:22 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:48:25 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a >>>>>>>>>>>>> new theory of everything. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an >>>>>>>>>>>> influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It’s done.....it’s the only theory that has the following main features: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As I said, this is an artifact of the mind of a psychopath who believes >>>>>>>>>> this happens. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No moron it is the mind of a logical scientist. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tough to shake delusions, isn't it? >>>>>>>> Let's go back to the quack doctor. There's a guy who never went to medical >>>>>>>> school and never read any books about medicine. Is he a medical doctor? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now he says he rejects all the writings in medical books and writes his own >>>>>>>> book, calling it inventing a whole new kind of medicine. He self-publishes >>>>>>>> this book and puts it up on Amazon. Is he now a medical doctor? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Moron you can’t equate physicists to medical doctors. Doctors don’t >>>>>>> operate on non-existing models whereas physicists dream up non-existing >>>>>>> models such as extra dimensions, virtual particles, curvature in spacetime.....etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Not gonna fly, Ken. The quack doctor doesn't believe what doctors say >>>>>> either. This is why he wrote the book, inventing a whole new kind of >>>>>> medicine, he says. Does his book and his disbelief of what doctors say make >>>>>> him a medical doctor? >>>>> >>>>> Moron......a quack doctor’s book has no real life support. >>>> >>>> Oh a quack doctor can "reinterpret" medical results to support his >>>> "whole new kind of medicine". That's a hallmark of a fraud. Oh, wait, >>>> that’s what you did. >>> >>> No moron.....I did more than reinterpreting. The model of physics I invented give rise to the following features: >> >> Oh, a quack doctor lists all sorts of sales benefits to his new idea. >> He's trying to sell his book, after all. >> Does this make him a doctor? > > It makes him a super doctor if his sales benefits are all true. And if HE is the only one that says all his sales benefits are true, then is he a doctor? Remember, it's only YOU that says all the sales benefits of your work are true. > That’s why Model Mechanics is a superior theory over current theories. >> >>> >>> _ It offers a realistic origin of the universe. >>> _ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. >>> _ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. >>> _ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature. >>> _ It can be validated experimentally. >>> _ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). >>> _ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity >>> (DTG) >>> _ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity >>> as subsets. >>> _ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. >>> _ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. >>> _ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. >>> _ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum >>> experiments. >>> _ It explains the structures of atoms. >> >> And does the fact that you've written a book and you list all sorts of >> sales benefits make you a physicist? > > Sure it does. Uh-huh. See if you can get anybody else to buy into that. So far .... not so much, right? You're a fraud. > ....Model Mechanics is a superior theory over current theories. It takes a superior physicist to invent such superior theory. >> > > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-22 07:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f578c785-8883-4e7a-a55b-857e70b5152f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423187 |
On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 12:08:59 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 6/21/17 8:16 AM, kenseto wrote: > > On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 2:30:39 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 6/19/17 1:24 PM, kenseto wrote: > >>> On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 2:03:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> On 6/19/17 7:16 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>>>> On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:32:03 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 6:21:22 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:48:25 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>>> . > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a > >>>>>>>>>>>>> new theory of everything. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an > >>>>>>>>>>>> influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> It’s done.....it’s the only theory that has the following main features: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> As I said, this is an artifact of the mind of a psychopath who believes > >>>>>>>>>> this happens. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> No moron it is the mind of a logical scientist. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Tough to shake delusions, isn't it? > >>>>>>>> Let's go back to the quack doctor. There's a guy who never went to medical > >>>>>>>> school and never read any books about medicine. Is he a medical doctor? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Now he says he rejects all the writings in medical books and writes his own > >>>>>>>> book, calling it inventing a whole new kind of medicine. He self-publishes > >>>>>>>> this book and puts it up on Amazon. Is he now a medical doctor? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Moron you can’t equate physicists to medical doctors. Doctors don’t > >>>>>>> operate on non-existing models whereas physicists dream up non-existing > >>>>>>> models such as extra dimensions, virtual particles, curvature in spacetime.....etc. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Not gonna fly, Ken. The quack doctor doesn't believe what doctors say > >>>>>> either. This is why he wrote the book, inventing a whole new kind of > >>>>>> medicine, he says. Does his book and his disbelief of what doctors say make > >>>>>> him a medical doctor? > >>>>> > >>>>> Moron......a quack doctor’s book has no real life support. > >>>> > >>>> Oh a quack doctor can "reinterpret" medical results to support his > >>>> "whole new kind of medicine". That's a hallmark of a fraud. Oh, wait, > >>>> that’s what you did. > >>> > >>> No moron.....I did more than reinterpreting. The model of physics I invented give rise to the following features: > >> > >> Oh, a quack doctor lists all sorts of sales benefits to his new idea. > >> He's trying to sell his book, after all. > >> Does this make him a doctor? > > > > It makes him a super doctor if his sales benefits are all true. > > And if HE is the only one that says all his sales benefits are true, > then is he a doctor? Sure if what he said is confirmed. For example: He came up with a new idea how to cure cancer. He proposes: 1. His patient is Joe and Joe has lung cancer. 2. The doctor finds another lung cancer patient whose name is Bob and Bob’s cancer tissue is not quite compatible with Joe’s cancer tissue. 3. The doctor cut a piece of Bob’s tumor and implant it unto Joe’s tumor and cut a piece of Joe’s tumor and implant it unto Bob’s tumor. 4. The idea is that Joes’ body will reject Bob’s cancer tissue by producing anti cancer serum to eliminate it. It is posited that this anti cancer serum produced by Joe’s body will also fight Joe’s own cancer cells and eliminate Joe’s cancer completely. 5. If this proposal is successful then the proposer is qualified as a doctor. > > Remember, it's only YOU that says all the sales benefits of your work > are true. Similarly if my work is confirmed experimentally then all the sales benefits expounded are true. > > > That’s why Model Mechanics is a superior theory over current theories. > >> > >>> > >>> _ It offers a realistic origin of the universe. > >>> _ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. > >>> _ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. > >>> _ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature. > >>> _ It can be validated experimentally. > >>> _ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). > >>> _ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity > >>> (DTG) > >>> _ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity > >>> as subsets. > >>> _ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. > >>> _ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. > >>> _ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. > >>> _ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum > >>> experiments. > >>> _ It explains the structures of atoms. > >> > >> And does the fact that you've written a book and you list all sorts of > >> sales benefits make you a physicist? > > > > Sure it does. > > Uh-huh. See if you can get anybody else to buy into that. So far .... > not so much, right? > You're a fraud. > > > ....Model Mechanics is a superior theory over current theories. It takes a superior physicist to invent such superior theory. > >> > > > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-22 15:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oih9a2$1gja$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #423260 |
On 6/22/17 9:45 AM, kenseto wrote: >> Remember, it's only YOU that says all the sales benefits of your work >> are true. > Similarly if my work is confirmed experimentally then all the sales benefits expounded are true. > And has it been confirmed experimentally? If no, then are you a physicist? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-24 05:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fa2f7ef4-46ca-4b84-87e5-f0443830dffd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423275 |
On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 4:28:53 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 6/22/17 9:45 AM, kenseto wrote:
> >> Remember, it's only YOU that says all the sales benefits of your work
> >> are true.
> > Similarly if my work is confirmed experimentally then all the sales benefits expounded are true.
> >
>
> And has it been confirmed experimentally? If no, then are you a physicist?
>
Yes, read chapter 5 of my book. I am physicist because I proposed a new physics theory that includes the following features:
_ It offers a realistic origin of the universe.
_ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters.
_ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes.
_ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature.
_ It can be validated experimentally.
_ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT).
_ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity
(DTG)
_ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity
as subsets.
_ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics.
_ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force.
_ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle.
_ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum
experiments.
- It explains the structures of atoms.
You are not a physicist, you are merely wood worker. Therefore you are not qualified to critricize my work on physics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-24 17:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oim64o$267$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #423362 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >> And has it been confirmed experimentally? If no, then are you a physicist? >Yes, read chapter 5 of my book. I am physicist because I proposed a new physics theory that includes the following features: >_ It offers a realistic origin of the universe. Which is wrong, of course. >_ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. And is wrong here, as well. >_ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. Which it gets wrong. >_ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature. And the mechanisms don't work, naturally. >_ It can be validated experimentally. And all experiments refute it. >_ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). Which is a complete, absolute failure. >_ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity > (DTG) Which is also a failure. >_ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity > as subsets. Which is obviously wrong, because if SR and GR were subsets, IRT would agree with everything they claim. But it doesn't, so GR and SR cannot be subsets. >_ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. Also completely wrong. >_ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. Which is a complete failure. >_ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. Another thing IRT fails at. >_ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum > experiments. Obviously wrong, as QM explains them all. >- It explains the structures of atoms. And yet another failure of IRT. >You are not a physicist, you are merely wood worker. Therefore you are >not qualified to critricize my work on physics. https://psychcentral.com/encyclopedia/delusion-of-grandeur/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-24 15:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oimj84$7ge$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #423362 |
On 6/24/17 7:46 AM, kenseto wrote: > Yes, read chapter 5 of my book. I am physicist because I proposed a new physics theory that includes the following features: Proposing something does not make you a physicist. ANYBODY can self-publish thoughts and claim they are important. Doesn't make him a physicist. You are deluded, and insane. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-04 16:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2640d175-42f8-4d2c-ad7d-9f7a847c78a0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423362 |
kenseto wrote:
> It explains the cell division and
> the consciousness processes.
That is my favorite one.
Students of Model Mechanics will also learn:
-It explains the shape of Portugal
-It predicts the paths of cows
-It explains the tweets of the U.S. President
-It shows why honey tastes good in hot tea
-It gives rise to peace in the Mideast
-It provides a reason for the length of earthworms
-It predicts the hair color of circus clowns
-It makes rough skin silky smooth
-It offers a realistic alternative to b-flat minor
---Tim Shuba---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-05 02:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ojhk6d$eps$5@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #423956 |
shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> writes: >kenseto wrote: >> It explains the cell division and >> the consciousness processes. >That is my favorite one. >Students of Model Mechanics will also learn: >-It explains the shape of Portugal >-It predicts the paths of cows >-It explains the tweets of the U.S. President >-It shows why honey tastes good in hot tea >-It gives rise to peace in the Mideast >-It provides a reason for the length of earthworms >-It predicts the hair color of circus clowns >-It makes rough skin silky smooth >-It offers a realistic alternative to b-flat minor Thanks for the laugh! Model Mechanics is a dessert topping! It's also a floor wax!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-04 22:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <HKOdncGgjYZS_sHEnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #423956 |
On 7/4/17 7/4/17 6:06 PM, shuba wrote: > -It offers a realistic alternative to b-flat minor Ha! This is, of course, A-sharp minor. Though going from 5 flats to seven sharps is not really very useful.... But FAR more useful than "Model Mechanics". Tom Roberts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-05 20:22 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ojiekt$1le8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #423975 |
On 05/07/17 13:58, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 7/4/17 7/4/17 6:06 PM, shuba wrote: >> -It offers a realistic alternative to b-flat minor > > Ha! This is, of course, A-sharp minor. Though going from 5 flats to > seven sharps is not really very useful.... But FAR more useful than > "Model Mechanics". > > Tom Roberts What Ken has compiled might contain occasional crap but it is a lot less harmful to physics than the rubbish Einstein dumped on its doorstep.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-05 11:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ojihbf$1pe6$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #423987 |
HGW, DSc. wrote: > On 05/07/17 13:58, Tom Roberts wrote: >> On 7/4/17 7/4/17 6:06 PM, shuba wrote: >>> -It offers a realistic alternative to b-flat minor >> >> Ha! This is, of course, A-sharp minor. Though going from 5 flats to >> seven sharps is not really very useful.... But FAR more useful than >> "Model Mechanics". Tom Roberts > > What Ken has compiled might contain occasional crap but it is a lot less > harmful to physics than the rubbish Einstein dumped on its doorstep. Agree. Moreover, the Model Mechanics of the Moving Bodies is been not yet proved wrong.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-05 11:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ojih8c$1pe6$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #423975 |
Tom Roberts wrote: > On 7/4/17 7/4/17 6:06 PM, shuba wrote: >> -It offers a realistic alternative to b-flat minor > > Ha! This is, of course, A-sharp minor. Though going from 5 flats to > seven sharps is not really very useful.... But FAR more useful than > "Model Mechanics". Tom Roberts Since you refuse to understand it. Which is unamerican.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-05 04:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8d5f0a1a-3ec4-4b3e-bf96-2daf2979eb49@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423975 |
On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 11:58:13 PM UTC-4, tjrob137 wrote: > On 7/4/17 7/4/17 6:06 PM, shuba wrote: > > -It offers a realistic alternative to b-flat minor > > Ha! This is, of course, A-sharp minor. Though going from 5 flats to seven sharps > is not really very useful.... But FAR more useful than "Model Mechanics". > > Tom Roberts This shows that you are not a true physicist.....instead an SR fanatic. <sad>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-06 13:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ojlddp$6vh$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #423975 |
Tom Roberts wrote: > On 7/4/17 7/4/17 6:06 PM, shuba wrote: >> -It offers a realistic alternative to b-flat minor > > Ha! This is, of course, A-sharp minor. Though going from 5 flats to > seven sharps is not really very useful.... But FAR more useful than > "Model Mechanics". Tom Roberts Certainly for you, incapable to understand it, in the first place.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-05 11:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ojih6f$1pe6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #423956 |
shuba wrote: > kenseto wrote: >> It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. > > That is my favorite one. Students of Model Mechanics will also learn: > -It explains the shape of Portugal -It predicts the paths of cows -It > explains the tweets of the U.S. President -It shows why honey tastes > good in hot tea -It gives rise to peace in the Mideast -It provides a > reason for the length of earthworms -It predicts the hair color of > circus clowns -It makes rough skin silky smooth -It offers a realistic > alternative to b-flat minor ---Tim Shuba--- Never mind. Buy american. Not buying american is unamerican.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-05 04:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3bac14c5-4b5b-4bc8-b838-8e6a0da5fc12@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423956 |
On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 7:06:28 PM UTC-4, shuba wrote: > kenseto wrote: > > > It explains the cell division and > > the consciousness processes. > > That is my favorite one. > > Students of Model Mechanics will also learn: > > -It explains the shape of Portugal > -It predicts the paths of cows > -It explains the tweets of the U.S. President > -It shows why honey tastes good in hot tea > -It gives rise to peace in the Mideast > -It provides a reason for the length of earthworms > -It predicts the hair color of circus clowns > -It makes rough skin silky smooth > -It offers a realistic alternative to b-flat minor > > > ---Tim Shuba--- Your post show that you are an SR fanatic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-05 12:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ojj8i4$12am$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #423995 |
On 7/5/17 6:20 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 7:06:28 PM UTC-4, shuba wrote: >> kenseto wrote: >> >>> It explains the cell division and >>> the consciousness processes. >> >> That is my favorite one. >> >> Students of Model Mechanics will also learn: >> >> -It explains the shape of Portugal >> -It predicts the paths of cows >> -It explains the tweets of the U.S. President >> -It shows why honey tastes good in hot tea >> -It gives rise to peace in the Mideast >> -It provides a reason for the length of earthworms >> -It predicts the hair color of circus clowns >> -It makes rough skin silky smooth >> -It offers a realistic alternative to b-flat minor >> >> >> ---Tim Shuba--- > > Your post show that you are an SR fanatic. > Well, I guess since your book has not had much to speak of in the way of sales, then I suppose the entire world has gone fanatical. And those who refuse to study Model Mechanics will never learn: - Why the sun rises in the east rather than in the north - Why the earth's surface is finite and yet has no edge where monsters lurk - Why beer foam is on the top and not on the bottom - How to make a warped board straight with a flashlight and a rubber band -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-19 11:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c8970243-c8f7-42dd-bdbd-be2b17299d49@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423016 |
W dniu poniedziałek, 19 czerwca 2017 20:03:30 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin > Oh a quack doctor can "reinterpret" medical results to support his > "whole new kind of medicine". And physicist can "reinterpret" physical results to support his "modern physics".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-19 20:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oi9c1s$2jv$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #423026 |
mlwozniak@wp.pl writes: >W dniu poniedziałek, 19 czerwca 2017 20:03:30 UTC+2 użytkownik >Odd Bodkin >> Oh a quack doctor can "reinterpret" medical results to support his >> "whole new kind of medicine". >And physicist can "reinterpret" physical results >to support his "modern physics". And that's exactly what Ken Seto is trying to do, "reinterpret" physical results to support his "Model Mechanics". Odd is calling him on it, but Seto simply doesn't see it. Seto doesn't see that he's exactly the same as Odd's quack doctor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-19 16:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oi9emu$1f0m$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #423037 |
On 6/19/17 3:26 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > mlwozniak@wp.pl writes: > >> W dniu poniedziałek, 19 czerwca 2017 20:03:30 UTC+2 użytkownik >> Odd Bodkin > >>> Oh a quack doctor can "reinterpret" medical results to support his >>> "whole new kind of medicine". > >> And physicist can "reinterpret" physical results >> to support his "modern physics". > > And that's exactly what Ken Seto is trying to do, "reinterpret" physical results > to support his "Model Mechanics". Odd is calling him on it, but Seto simply > doesn't see it. Seto doesn't see that he's exactly the same as Odd's quack doctor. > Seto cannot accept that he is a quack and a fraud. He doesn't FEEL like he's cheating, so he's unwilling to admit that he's cheating. He's a quack and a fraud, no matter how hard he splutters that it's not true. NOBODY can make a key advance in a field while being uneducated in that field. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web