Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #422344 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "HGW..." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-12 20:18 +1000 |
| Last post | 2017-06-23 21:14 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 216 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-12 20:18 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-12 15:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Selina Dieter <uiueeits@wlwtwstd.ci> - 2017-06-12 17:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-06-12 21:57 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-06-12 18:03 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-12 09:34 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 04:39 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Selina Dieter <uiueeits@wlwtwstd.ci> - 2017-06-12 18:40 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 05:26 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-12 13:57 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 05:28 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 15:14 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-13 07:17 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 15:16 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-14 08:58 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 10:45 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-14 07:26 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-14 15:00 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 11:30 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 06:15 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 15:48 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 06:54 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 15:56 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-15 01:55 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 20:54 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-15 13:01 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-16 03:41 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Kotovanich Nzerovu <ivhvruo@wovewvw.ev> - 2017-06-15 17:49 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-16 04:28 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 16:44 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? Nými Icelulózy <ejienm@wzsfwe.ul> - 2017-06-16 11:28 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Nými Icelulózy <ejienm@wzsfwe.ul> - 2017-06-16 18:27 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 16:37 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 07:23 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 07:21 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-15 07:25 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 10:24 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:08 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:23 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:28 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:37 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 15:25 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 15:02 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-17 07:35 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-17 11:48 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-17 12:03 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-17 22:21 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-18 04:27 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-06-18 13:52 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-19 05:09 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Rhett Doucet <ttdh@etoe.ee> - 2017-06-19 12:42 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-06-19 17:26 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 12:32 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-19 05:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-19 12:38 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 13:03 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-19 11:24 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 13:30 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-21 06:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:08 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-22 07:45 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 15:28 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-24 05:46 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-24 17:05 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-24 15:49 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 16:06 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-05 02:50 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-07-04 22:58 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-07-05 20:22 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-05 11:08 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-05 11:06 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-05 04:26 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-06 13:19 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-05 11:05 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-05 04:20 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 12:44 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-19 11:25 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-19 20:26 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 16:12 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-21 06:23 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:10 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-22 09:00 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-22 01:16 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 15:29 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-22 01:56 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 12:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-22 05:49 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-22 06:54 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-22 15:58 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-23 09:30 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-06-23 09:18 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-23 23:34 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-25 09:26 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-25 00:55 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Julianna Eliason <nujasenea@wiwnwajau.nc> - 2017-06-18 14:20 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-18 08:45 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Julianna Eliason <nujasenea@wiwnwajau.nc> - 2017-06-18 15:47 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-18 16:10 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-18 16:08 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Julianna Eliason <nujasenea@wiwnwajau.nc> - 2017-06-18 16:54 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-18 03:15 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Nými Icelulózy <ejienm@wzsfwe.ul> - 2017-06-16 13:52 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-15 07:21 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 10:23 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:05 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:21 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 15:44 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 11:14 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:23 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:26 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-16 08:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-17 15:02 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-17 11:56 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-14 09:21 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-14 07:12 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 06:34 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 10:17 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 23:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:49 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-16 00:57 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:51 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 23:59 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-15 08:23 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-14 18:50 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:38 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-17 08:25 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 02:10 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 07:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-18 08:53 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-18 05:52 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-18 14:50 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-19 09:48 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-19 01:42 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-19 19:33 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-19 19:45 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-20 08:14 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-20 08:42 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-21 14:37 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-21 19:18 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-22 08:15 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 15:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 21:18 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-22 03:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-23 07:00 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 02:16 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 20:07 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 20:39 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 10:19 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-26 12:12 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 13:21 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-27 19:58 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:39 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-27 16:25 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 13:01 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-27 11:53 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:35 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-27 13:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:38 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-28 03:54 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 19:35 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-04 00:04 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-28 09:48 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-28 13:54 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-29 00:46 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-30 09:04 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-30 23:17 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-31 10:40 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:08 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-01 09:57 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 03:11 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-02 08:31 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-08-02 09:04 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 11:00 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-03 07:15 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 10:27 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-04 11:48 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 02:34 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 09:01 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 14:42 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-01 03:02 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 13:57 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-01 10:43 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-01 09:56 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:08 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:33 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-22 02:49 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 08:43 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 19:46 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 02:12 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 02:14 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 10:41 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:27 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 09:05 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-16 21:39 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-16 22:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-17 00:08 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 08:00 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-17 09:39 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-18 21:18 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 14:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 19:16 -0400
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-21 12:59 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 07:51 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 07:45 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-17 20:02 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-17 20:19 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-20 11:39 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Lipek Mniak <iluka@sskwpiw.pp> - 2017-06-21 11:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-21 23:10 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-21 06:28 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:06 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-22 07:50 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-24 11:11 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-23 21:14 -0700
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-16 08:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oi0mvb$oae$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #422720 |
On 6/16/17 8:28 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:23:14 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 6/16/17 8:08 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:24:21 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 6/15/17 9:25 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 4:48:27 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> On 6/14/17 3:15 PM, HGW, DSc. wrote: >>>>>>> On 15/06/17 02:30, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/14/17 9:26 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You're going to die thinking that the whole world is full of idiots >>>>>>>>>> because you were ignored. Does that sound mentally healthy to you? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I don’t think thatat all. I think that they don’t pay attention to >>>>>>>>> Model Mechanics because of the following reasons: >>>>>>>>> 1. Afraid that Model Mechanics will spread wildly in the internet. >>>>>>>>> 2. Don’t want to rock the boat. >>>>>>>>> 3. Money. >>>>>>>>> 4. Avoid embarrassment. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You honestly don't think there's another possibility for why you're >>>>>>>> being ignored, Ken? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could it be because you >>>>>>>> - don't know what the concepts of physics mean >>>>>>>> - haven't read anything about physics >>>>>>>> - can't do 4th grade arithmetic >>>>>>>> - believe that physics should be understandable to the common man, >>>>>>>> regardless of background and training >>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tell me, Ken. Suppose you developed a bad cough and were spitting up >>>>>>>> blood. Then someone you know told you that he could fix you right up. >>>>>>>> You ask him if he's a doctor, and he says "Yes, I'm a doctor, but I >>>>>>>> don't have a license." >>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bodkin, that sound just like YOU and physics.... >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not a physicist. But I’ve read some things by physicists. >>>>> >>>>> But you don’t understand what you read. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> You wouldn't know, Ken. You haven't read anything, let alone what I've >>>> read. You're not in a position to judge. >>>> >>> >>> Yes I do know.....every time I ask you a question on physics, you tell me to go and read a book. >>> >> >> Yup, because that’s what people do to learn a subject. > > Then why do you keep on saying that I am wrong when you don’t know any physics????? I *do* know physics, because I have read about it. You have not read anything about physics, and so you don't know anything about physics. You are not in a position to judge anyone else AT ALL about whether they know physics or not. What you do is claim they don't know physics if they won't teach you the physics on the internet. That's a children's game. > > >> You don't want to do that, and so you will never learn any physics. >> Because you don't know any physics, you're not in a position to judge >> what other people understand. >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-16 06:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c38518c5-492b-4430-a093-679c94ceb034@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #422722 |
On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:37:51 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 6/16/17 8:28 AM, kenseto wrote: > > On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:23:14 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 6/16/17 8:08 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>> On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:24:21 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> On 6/15/17 9:25 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 4:48:27 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> On 6/14/17 3:15 PM, HGW, DSc. wrote: > >>>>>>> On 15/06/17 02:30, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 6/14/17 9:26 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> You're going to die thinking that the whole world is full of idiots > >>>>>>>>>> because you were ignored. Does that sound mentally healthy to you? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I don’t think thatat all. I think that they don’t pay attention to > >>>>>>>>> Model Mechanics because of the following reasons: > >>>>>>>>> 1. Afraid that Model Mechanics will spread wildly in the internet. > >>>>>>>>> 2. Don’t want to rock the boat. > >>>>>>>>> 3. Money. > >>>>>>>>> 4. Avoid embarrassment. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You honestly don't think there's another possibility for why you're > >>>>>>>> being ignored, Ken? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Could it be because you > >>>>>>>> - don't know what the concepts of physics mean > >>>>>>>> - haven't read anything about physics > >>>>>>>> - can't do 4th grade arithmetic > >>>>>>>> - believe that physics should be understandable to the common man, > >>>>>>>> regardless of background and training > >>>>>>>> ? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Tell me, Ken. Suppose you developed a bad cough and were spitting up > >>>>>>>> blood. Then someone you know told you that he could fix you right up. > >>>>>>>> You ask him if he's a doctor, and he says "Yes, I'm a doctor, but I > >>>>>>>> don't have a license." > >>>>>>> <snip> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Bodkin, that sound just like YOU and physics.... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm not a physicist. But I’ve read some things by physicists. > >>>>> > >>>>> But you don’t understand what you read. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> You wouldn't know, Ken. You haven't read anything, let alone what I've > >>>> read. You're not in a position to judge. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Yes I do know.....every time I ask you a question on physics, you tell me to go and read a book. > >>> > >> > >> Yup, because that’s what people do to learn a subject. > > > > Then why do you keep on saying that I am wrong when you don’t know any physics????? > > I *do* know physics, because I have read about it. No sir, you don’t know physics. > You have not read anything about physics, and so you don't know anything > about physics. > You are not in a position to judge anyone else AT ALL about whether they > know physics or not. You never display any knowledge in physics in all your postings. > > What you do is claim they don't know physics if they won't teach you the > physics on the internet. That’s a children's game. Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a new theory of everything. > > > > > > >> You don't want to do that, and so you will never learn any physics. > >> Because you don't know any physics, you're not in a position to judge > >> what other people understand. > >> > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-16 15:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oi0t9u$100$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #422725 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:37:51 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 6/16/17 8:28 AM, kenseto wrote: >> > Then why do you keep on saying that I am wrong when you don't know any >> > physics????? Ken, he does know physics, despite the fact he's not a physicist. That's because he apparently reads *lots* of books, unlike yourself. >> I *do* know physics, because I have read about it. >No sir, you don't know physics. Stupid Ken, you are in no position to say who does and who doesn't know anything about physics. You have to know something about physics before you know if someone else does or doesn't know anything. >> You have not read anything about physics, and so you don't know anything >> about physics. >> You are not in a position to judge anyone else AT ALL about whether they= >> know physics or not. >You never display any knowledge in physics in all your postings. Say what? Odd seems quite knowledgeable. >Not at all.....I don't need anybody to teach me physics. I invented > a new theory of everything. No, Stupid Ken, to disprove or supersede any theory of physics, you have to understand it first. You admit that you won't learn anything about physics, and you refuse to read any of the books Odd pointed you at.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-16 15:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oi1dgd$1u3r$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #422725 |
On 6/16/17 8:47 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:37:51 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 6/16/17 8:28 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:23:14 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 6/16/17 8:08 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:24:21 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> On 6/15/17 9:25 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 4:48:27 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/14/17 3:15 PM, HGW, DSc. wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 15/06/17 02:30, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/14/17 9:26 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You're going to die thinking that the whole world is full of idiots >>>>>>>>>>>> because you were ignored. Does that sound mentally healthy to you? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I don’t think thatat all. I think that they don’t pay attention to >>>>>>>>>>> Model Mechanics because of the following reasons: >>>>>>>>>>> 1. Afraid that Model Mechanics will spread wildly in the internet. >>>>>>>>>>> 2. Don’t want to rock the boat. >>>>>>>>>>> 3. Money. >>>>>>>>>>> 4. Avoid embarrassment. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You honestly don't think there's another possibility for why you're >>>>>>>>>> being ignored, Ken? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Could it be because you >>>>>>>>>> - don't know what the concepts of physics mean >>>>>>>>>> - haven't read anything about physics >>>>>>>>>> - can't do 4th grade arithmetic >>>>>>>>>> - believe that physics should be understandable to the common man, >>>>>>>>>> regardless of background and training >>>>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tell me, Ken. Suppose you developed a bad cough and were spitting up >>>>>>>>>> blood. Then someone you know told you that he could fix you right up. >>>>>>>>>> You ask him if he's a doctor, and he says "Yes, I'm a doctor, but I >>>>>>>>>> don't have a license." >>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bodkin, that sound just like YOU and physics.... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm not a physicist. But I’ve read some things by physicists. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But you don’t understand what you read. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You wouldn't know, Ken. You haven't read anything, let alone what I've >>>>>> read. You're not in a position to judge. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes I do know.....every time I ask you a question on physics, you tell me to go and read a book. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yup, because that’s what people do to learn a subject. >>> >>> Then why do you keep on saying that I am wrong when you don’t know any physics????? >> >> I *do* know physics, because I have read about it. > > No sir, you don’t know physics. > >> You have not read anything about physics, and so you don't know anything >> about physics. >> You are not in a position to judge anyone else AT ALL about whether they >> know physics or not. > > You never display any knowledge in physics in all your postings. Not to you. You're not worth the time. > >> >> What you do is claim they don't know physics if they won't teach you the >> physics on the internet. That’s a children's game. > > Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a new theory of everything. It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics. We talked about the fraudulent fantasy of the guy who imagines he's a revolutionary doctor who has never studied medicine. We could talk about the fraudulent fantasy of a guy who imagines he's a revolutionary mathematician who has never studied mathematics. What other fraudulent fantasies do you want to talk about? > > >> >>> >>> >>>> You don't want to do that, and so you will never learn any physics. >>>> Because you don't know any physics, you're not in a position to judge >>>> what other people understand. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-17 07:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8b9a9c54-87c4-46a5-baf2-48d75c00cd30@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #422747 |
On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 4:02:26 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 6/16/17 8:47 AM, kenseto wrote:
> > On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:37:51 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >> On 6/16/17 8:28 AM, kenseto wrote:
> >>> On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:23:14 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>> On 6/16/17 8:08 AM, kenseto wrote:
> >>>>> On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:24:21 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>>>> On 6/15/17 9:25 AM, kenseto wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 4:48:27 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 6/14/17 3:15 PM, HGW, DSc. wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 15/06/17 02:30, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 6/14/17 9:26 AM, kenseto wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You're going to die thinking that the whole world is full of idiots
> >>>>>>>>>>>> because you were ignored. Does that sound mentally healthy to you?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I don’t think thatat all. I think that they don’t pay attention to
> >>>>>>>>>>> Model Mechanics because of the following reasons:
> >>>>>>>>>>> 1. Afraid that Model Mechanics will spread wildly in the internet.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2. Don’t want to rock the boat.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 3. Money.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 4. Avoid embarrassment.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> You honestly don't think there's another possibility for why you're
> >>>>>>>>>> being ignored, Ken?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Could it be because you
> >>>>>>>>>> - don't know what the concepts of physics mean
> >>>>>>>>>> - haven't read anything about physics
> >>>>>>>>>> - can't do 4th grade arithmetic
> >>>>>>>>>> - believe that physics should be understandable to the common man,
> >>>>>>>>>> regardless of background and training
> >>>>>>>>>> ?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Tell me, Ken. Suppose you developed a bad cough and were spitting up
> >>>>>>>>>> blood. Then someone you know told you that he could fix you right up.
> >>>>>>>>>> You ask him if he's a doctor, and he says "Yes, I'm a doctor, but I
> >>>>>>>>>> don't have a license."
> >>>>>>>>> <snip>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Bodkin, that sound just like YOU and physics....
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'm not a physicist. But I’ve read some things by physicists.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> But you don’t understand what you read.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You wouldn't know, Ken. You haven't read anything, let alone what I've
> >>>>>> read. You're not in a position to judge.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes I do know.....every time I ask you a question on physics, you tell me to go and read a book.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yup, because that’s what people do to learn a subject.
> >>>
> >>> Then why do you keep on saying that I am wrong when you don’t know any physics?????
> >>
> >> I *do* know physics, because I have read about it.
> >
> > No sir, you don’t know physics.
> >
> >> You have not read anything about physics, and so you don't know anything
> >> about physics.
> >> You are not in a position to judge anyone else AT ALL about whether they
> >> know physics or not.
> >
> > You never display any knowledge in physics in all your postings.
>
> Not to you. You’re not worth the time.
Moron.....Then why are you wasting so much time on my posts????
>
> >
> >>
> >> What you do is claim they don't know physics if they won't teach you the
> >> physics on the internet. That’s a children's game.
> >
> > Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a new theory of everything.
>
> It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an
> influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics.
It’s done.....it’s the only theory that has the following main features:
_ It offers a realistic origin of the universe.
_ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters.
_ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes.
_ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature.
_ It can be validated experimentally.
_ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT).
_ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity
(DTG)
_ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity
as subsets.
_ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics.
_ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force.
_ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle.
_ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum
experiments.
_ It explains the structures of atoms.
>
> We talked about the fraudulent fantasy of the guy who imagines he's a
> revolutionary doctor who has never studied medicine. We could talk about
> the fraudulent fantasy of a guy who imagines he's a revolutionary
> mathematician who has never studied mathematics. What other fraudulent
> fantasies do you want to talk about?
>
Moron I have to know something about physics in order to write a book on physics.....gee you are so fucking stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-17 11:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oi3mgm$tv4$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #422798 |
On 6/17/17 9:35 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 4:02:26 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 6/16/17 8:47 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:37:51 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 6/16/17 8:28 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>> On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:23:14 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> On 6/16/17 8:08 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>> On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:24:21 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/15/17 9:25 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 4:48:27 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/14/17 3:15 PM, HGW, DSc. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 15/06/17 02:30, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/14/17 9:26 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're going to die thinking that the whole world is full of idiots >>>>>>>>>>>>>> because you were ignored. Does that sound mentally healthy to you? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don’t think thatat all. I think that they don’t pay attention to >>>>>>>>>>>>> Model Mechanics because of the following reasons: >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Afraid that Model Mechanics will spread wildly in the internet. >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Don’t want to rock the boat. >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Money. >>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. Avoid embarrassment. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You honestly don't think there's another possibility for why you're >>>>>>>>>>>> being ignored, Ken? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Could it be because you >>>>>>>>>>>> - don't know what the concepts of physics mean >>>>>>>>>>>> - haven't read anything about physics >>>>>>>>>>>> - can't do 4th grade arithmetic >>>>>>>>>>>> - believe that physics should be understandable to the common man, >>>>>>>>>>>> regardless of background and training >>>>>>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tell me, Ken. Suppose you developed a bad cough and were spitting up >>>>>>>>>>>> blood. Then someone you know told you that he could fix you right up. >>>>>>>>>>>> You ask him if he's a doctor, and he says "Yes, I'm a doctor, but I >>>>>>>>>>>> don't have a license." >>>>>>>>>>> <snip> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bodkin, that sound just like YOU and physics.... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm not a physicist. But I’ve read some things by physicists. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But you don’t understand what you read. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You wouldn't know, Ken. You haven't read anything, let alone what I've >>>>>>>> read. You're not in a position to judge. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes I do know.....every time I ask you a question on physics, you tell me to go and read a book. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yup, because that’s what people do to learn a subject. >>>>> >>>>> Then why do you keep on saying that I am wrong when you don’t know any physics????? >>>> >>>> I *do* know physics, because I have read about it. >>> >>> No sir, you don’t know physics. >>> >>>> You have not read anything about physics, and so you don't know anything >>>> about physics. >>>> You are not in a position to judge anyone else AT ALL about whether they >>>> know physics or not. >>> >>> You never display any knowledge in physics in all your postings. >> >> Not to you. You’re not worth the time. > > Moron.....Then why are you wasting so much time on my posts???? Because I'm encouraging you to read, even though you have a terror about that. > >> >>> >>>> >>>> What you do is claim they don't know physics if they won't teach you the >>>> physics on the internet. That’s a children's game. >>> >>> Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a new theory of everything. >> >> It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an >> influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics. > > It’s done.....it’s the only theory that has the following main features: As I said, this is an artifact of the mind of a psychopath who believes this happens. > _ It offers a realistic origin of the universe. > _ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. > _ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. > _ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature. > _ It can be validated experimentally. > _ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). > _ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity > (DTG) > _ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity > as subsets. > _ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. > _ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. > _ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. > _ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum > experiments. > _ It explains the structures of atoms. > > >> >> We talked about the fraudulent fantasy of the guy who imagines he's a >> revolutionary doctor who has never studied medicine. We could talk about >> the fraudulent fantasy of a guy who imagines he's a revolutionary >> mathematician who has never studied mathematics. What other fraudulent >> fantasies do you want to talk about? >> > > Moron I have to know something about physics in order to write a book on physics.....gee you are so fucking stupid. No, you don't. Anybody, even an uneducated idiot, can write a book, say it is about physics, and announce that he has solved everything. That's called being a fraud. You've done that. > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-17 12:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <58036b46-e5f7-46e1-b47d-5b938bf2a60c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #422805 |
On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:48:25 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 6/17/17 9:35 AM, kenseto wrote: > > On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 4:02:26 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 6/16/17 8:47 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>> On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:37:51 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> On 6/16/17 8:28 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>>>> On Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:23:14 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> On 6/16/17 8:08 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>>>>>> On Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:24:21 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 6/15/17 9:25 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 4:48:27 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 6/14/17 3:15 PM, HGW, DSc. wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> On 15/06/17 02:30, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/14/17 9:26 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're going to die thinking that the whole world is full of idiots > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> because you were ignored. Does that sound mentally healthy to you? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don’t think thatat all. I think that they don’t pay attention to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Model Mechanics because of the following reasons: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Afraid that Model Mechanics will spread wildly in the internet. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Don’t want to rock the boat. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Money. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. Avoid embarrassment. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> You honestly don't think there's another possibility for why you're > >>>>>>>>>>>> being ignored, Ken? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Could it be because you > >>>>>>>>>>>> - don't know what the concepts of physics mean > >>>>>>>>>>>> - haven't read anything about physics > >>>>>>>>>>>> - can't do 4th grade arithmetic > >>>>>>>>>>>> - believe that physics should be understandable to the common man, > >>>>>>>>>>>> regardless of background and training > >>>>>>>>>>>> ? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Tell me, Ken. Suppose you developed a bad cough and were spitting up > >>>>>>>>>>>> blood. Then someone you know told you that he could fix you right up. > >>>>>>>>>>>> You ask him if he's a doctor, and he says "Yes, I'm a doctor, but I > >>>>>>>>>>>> don't have a license." > >>>>>>>>>>> <snip> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Bodkin, that sound just like YOU and physics.... > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I'm not a physicist. But I’ve read some things by physicists. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> But you don’t understand what you read. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You wouldn't know, Ken. You haven't read anything, let alone what I've > >>>>>>>> read. You're not in a position to judge. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yes I do know.....every time I ask you a question on physics, you tell me to go and read a book. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Yup, because that’s what people do to learn a subject. > >>>>> > >>>>> Then why do you keep on saying that I am wrong when you don’t know any physics????? > >>>> > >>>> I *do* know physics, because I have read about it. > >>> > >>> No sir, you don’t know physics. > >>> > >>>> You have not read anything about physics, and so you don't know anything > >>>> about physics. > >>>> You are not in a position to judge anyone else AT ALL about whether they > >>>> know physics or not. > >>> > >>> You never display any knowledge in physics in all your postings. > >> > >> Not to you. You’re not worth the time. > > > > Moron.....Then why are you wasting so much time on my posts???? > > Because I'm encouraging you to read, even though you have a terror about > that. Moron....I read books and I reject current the current theories such as SR/GR and that’s why I wrote a book to correct such theories. > > > > >> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> What you do is claim they don't know physics if they won't teach you the > >>>> physics on the internet. That’s a children's game. > >>> > >>> Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a new theory of everything. > >> > >> It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an > >> influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics. > > > > It’s done.....it’s the only theory that has the following main features: > > As I said, this is an artifact of the mind of a psychopath who believes > this happens. No moron it is the mind of a logical scientist. > > > _ It offers a realistic origin of the universe. > > _ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. > > _ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. > > _ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature. > > _ It can be validated experimentally. > > _ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). > > _ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity > > (DTG) > > _ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity > > as subsets. > > _ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. > > _ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. > > _ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. > > _ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum > > experiments. > > _ It explains the structures of atoms. > > > > > >> > >> We talked about the fraudulent fantasy of the guy who imagines he's a > >> revolutionary doctor who has never studied medicine. We could talk about > >> the fraudulent fantasy of a guy who imagines he's a revolutionary > >> mathematician who has never studied mathematics. What other fraudulent > >> fantasies do you want to talk about? > >> > > > > Moron I have to know something about physics in order to write a book on physics.....gee you are so fucking stupid. > > No, you don't. Anybody, even an uneducated idiot, can write a book, say > it is about physics, and announce that he has solved everything. That's > called being a fraud. You've done that. You are an uneducated idiot.....why don’t you write a book?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-17 22:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oi4a0u$1rp5$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #422816 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:48:25 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: . >>>>> >>>>> Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a >>>>> new theory of everything. >>>> >>>> It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an >>>> influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics. >>> >>> It’s done.....it’s the only theory that has the following main features: >> >> As I said, this is an artifact of the mind of a psychopath who believes >> this happens. > > No moron it is the mind of a logical scientist. > >> Tough to shake delusions, isn't it? Let's go back to the quack doctor. There's a guy who never went to medical school and never read any books about medicine. Is he a medical doctor? Now he says he rejects all the writings in medical books and writes his own book, calling it inventing a whole new kind of medicine. He self-publishes this book and puts it up on Amazon. Is he now a medical doctor? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-18 04:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4cb676d0-f919-4945-98b1-cf081a90e52e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #422865 |
On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 6:21:22 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > > On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:48:25 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > . > >>>>> > >>>>> Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a > >>>>> new theory of everything. > >>>> > >>>> It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an > >>>> influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics. > >>> > >>> It’s done.....it’s the only theory that has the following main features: > >> > >> As I said, this is an artifact of the mind of a psychopath who believes > >> this happens. > > > > No moron it is the mind of a logical scientist. > > > >> > > Tough to shake delusions, isn't it? > Let's go back to the quack doctor. There's a guy who never went to medical > school and never read any books about medicine. Is he a medical doctor? > > Now he says he rejects all the writings in medical books and writes his own > book, calling it inventing a whole new kind of medicine. He self-publishes > this book and puts it up on Amazon. Is he now a medical doctor? Moron you can’t equate physicists to medical doctors. Doctors don’t operate on non-existing models whereas physicists dream up non-existing models such as extra dimensions, virtual particles, curvature in spacetime.....etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-18 13:52 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <oi5pj6$1nrf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #422893 |
Op 18-jun-2017 om 13:27 schreef kenseto: > On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 6:21:22 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: [snip] >> Tough to shake delusions, isn't it? Let's go back to the quack >> doctor. There's a guy who never went to medical school and never >> read any books about medicine. Is he a medical doctor? >> >> Now he says he rejects all the writings in medical books and writes >> his own book, calling it inventing a whole new kind of medicine. He >> self-publishes this book and puts it up on Amazon. Is he now a >> medical doctor? > > Moron you can’t equate physicists to medical doctors. Doctors don’t > operate on non-existing models whereas physicists dream up > non-existing models such as extra dimensions, virtual particles, > curvature in spacetime..... E-Matrices, E-Strings, S-Particles, S-Particle Balls, Vbb Motion, Vse Motion, Vsdq Motion, Vsuk Motion, CRE force etc... Dirk Vdm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-19 05:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <88bfc886-0ab7-4ea4-9f9b-ac42d760d8c3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #422896 |
On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 7:53:13 AM UTC-4, Dirk Van de moortel wrote: > Op 18-jun-2017 om 13:27 schreef kenseto: > > On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 6:21:22 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > [snip] > > >> Tough to shake delusions, isn't it? Let's go back to the quack > >> doctor. There's a guy who never went to medical school and never > >> read any books about medicine. Is he a medical doctor? > >> > >> Now he says he rejects all the writings in medical books and writes > >> his own book, calling it inventing a whole new kind of medicine. He > >> self-publishes this book and puts it up on Amazon. Is he now a > >> medical doctor? > > > > Moron you can’t equate physicists to medical doctors. Doctors don’t > > operate on non-existing models whereas physicists dream up > > non-existing models such as extra dimensions, virtual particles, > > curvature in spacetime..... > > E-Matrices, E-Strings, S-Particles, S-Particle Balls, > Vbb Motion, Vse Motion, Vsdq Motion, Vsuk Motion, CRE force > etc... The point is: All the above items are derivable from one physical model of the universe. Current physics has many models: 1. Extra dimensions. 2. A zoo of virtual particles and fields. 3. Curvature in spacetime. 4. Clock time dilation. 5. Length contraction. 6. Light speed is a universal constant. 7. No viable theory of quantum gravity. 8. etc..... All of these models are disconnected and not derivable from one physical model of the universe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rhett Doucet <ttdh@etoe.ee> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-19 12:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oi8gsi$1o48$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #422963 |
kenseto wrote: >> E-Matrices, E-Strings, S-Particles, S-Particle Balls, >> Vbb Motion, Vse Motion, Vsdq Motion, Vsuk Motion, CRE force etc... > > The point is: All the above items are derivable from one physical model > of the universe. Current physics has many models: > 1. Extra dimensions. > 2. A zoo of virtual particles and fields. > 3. Curvature in spacetime. > 4. Clock time dilation. > 5. Length contraction. > 6. Light speed is a universal constant. > 7. No viable theory of quantum gravity. > 8. etc..... > > All of these models are disconnected and not derivable from one physical > model of the universe. Excellent succinctly putted summary, explaining what is wrong in Modern Science nowadays. I wish more people putting things succinctly, as Dr. Kenseto does. Thanks a bunch. So I learn something.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-19 17:26 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <oi8qgg$b14$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #422963 |
Op 19-jun-2017 om 14:09 schreef kenseto: > On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 7:53:13 AM UTC-4, Dirk Van de moortel wrote: >> Op 18-jun-2017 om 13:27 schreef kenseto: >>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 6:21:22 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>>> Tough to shake delusions, isn't it? Let's go back to the quack >>>> doctor. There's a guy who never went to medical school and never >>>> read any books about medicine. Is he a medical doctor? >>>> >>>> Now he says he rejects all the writings in medical books and writes >>>> his own book, calling it inventing a whole new kind of medicine. He >>>> self-publishes this book and puts it up on Amazon. Is he now a >>>> medical doctor? >>> >>> Moron you can’t equate physicists to medical doctors. Doctors don’t >>> operate on non-existing models whereas physicists dream up >>> non-existing models such as extra dimensions, virtual particles, >>> curvature in spacetime..... >> >> E-Matrices, E-Strings, S-Particles, S-Particle Balls, >> Vbb Motion, Vse Motion, Vsdq Motion, Vsuk Motion, CRE force >> etc... > > The point is: Your head? http://www.manic-expression.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Unknown1.jpeg Dirk Vdm
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-18 12:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oi5rs0$1r5l$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #422893 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 6:21:22 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:48:25 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> . >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a >>>>>>> new theory of everything. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an >>>>>> influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics. >>>>> >>>>> It’s done.....it’s the only theory that has the following main features: >>>> >>>> As I said, this is an artifact of the mind of a psychopath who believes >>>> this happens. >>> >>> No moron it is the mind of a logical scientist. >>> >>>> >> >> Tough to shake delusions, isn't it? >> Let's go back to the quack doctor. There's a guy who never went to medical >> school and never read any books about medicine. Is he a medical doctor? >> >> Now he says he rejects all the writings in medical books and writes his own >> book, calling it inventing a whole new kind of medicine. He self-publishes >> this book and puts it up on Amazon. Is he now a medical doctor? > > Moron you can’t equate physicists to medical doctors. Doctors don’t > operate on non-existing models whereas physicists dream up non-existing > models such as extra dimensions, virtual particles, curvature in spacetime.....etc. > Not gonna fly, Ken. The quack doctor doesn't believe what doctors say either. This is why he wrote the book, inventing a whole new kind of medicine, he says. Does his book and his disbelief of what doctors say make him a medical doctor? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-19 05:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <71f9359d-0f6d-4a59-b426-99600c2c5b70@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #422898 |
On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:32:03 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > > On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 6:21:22 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:48:25 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> . > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a > >>>>>>> new theory of everything. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an > >>>>>> influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics. > >>>>> > >>>>> It’s done.....it’s the only theory that has the following main features: > >>>> > >>>> As I said, this is an artifact of the mind of a psychopath who believes > >>>> this happens. > >>> > >>> No moron it is the mind of a logical scientist. > >>> > >>>> > >> > >> Tough to shake delusions, isn't it? > >> Let's go back to the quack doctor. There's a guy who never went to medical > >> school and never read any books about medicine. Is he a medical doctor? > >> > >> Now he says he rejects all the writings in medical books and writes his own > >> book, calling it inventing a whole new kind of medicine. He self-publishes > >> this book and puts it up on Amazon. Is he now a medical doctor? > > > > Moron you can’t equate physicists to medical doctors. Doctors don’t > > operate on non-existing models whereas physicists dream up non-existing > > models such as extra dimensions, virtual particles, curvature in spacetime.....etc. > > > > Not gonna fly, Ken. The quack doctor doesn't believe what doctors say > either. This is why he wrote the book, inventing a whole new kind of > medicine, he says. Does his book and his disbelief of what doctors say make > him a medical doctor? Moron......a quack doctor’s book has no real life support. My book is supported by experiments. Also my book advanced a new theory of gravity that incompatible with QM and it advanced a new theory of relativity that eliminated the paradoxes of SR.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-19 12:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oi8gl0$7lc$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #422964 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >Moron......a quack doctor's book has no real life support. And neither does yours, Stupid Ken. >My book is supported by experiments. No, it is not. >Also my book advanced a new theory of gravity that incompatible with QM And it failed completely. >and it advanced a new theory of relativity that eliminated the paradoxes >of SR. There are no paradoxes of relativity, just teaching examples that appear to be paradoxes at first. So you don't understand Odd's comparison, how the quack doctor isn't a doctor just because he doesn't believe what real doctors say and wrote a whole new book on medicine, and how someone named Seto isn't a physicist just because he doesn't believe what real physicists say and wrote a whole new book on physics. It's a perfect comparison.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-19 13:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oi93lf$qbd$7@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #422964 |
On 6/19/17 7:16 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:32:03 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 6:21:22 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:48:25 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> . >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a >>>>>>>>> new theory of everything. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an >>>>>>>> influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It’s done.....it’s the only theory that has the following main features: >>>>>> >>>>>> As I said, this is an artifact of the mind of a psychopath who believes >>>>>> this happens. >>>>> >>>>> No moron it is the mind of a logical scientist. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> Tough to shake delusions, isn't it? >>>> Let's go back to the quack doctor. There's a guy who never went to medical >>>> school and never read any books about medicine. Is he a medical doctor? >>>> >>>> Now he says he rejects all the writings in medical books and writes his own >>>> book, calling it inventing a whole new kind of medicine. He self-publishes >>>> this book and puts it up on Amazon. Is he now a medical doctor? >>> >>> Moron you can’t equate physicists to medical doctors. Doctors don’t >>> operate on non-existing models whereas physicists dream up non-existing >>> models such as extra dimensions, virtual particles, curvature in spacetime.....etc. >>> >> >> Not gonna fly, Ken. The quack doctor doesn't believe what doctors say >> either. This is why he wrote the book, inventing a whole new kind of >> medicine, he says. Does his book and his disbelief of what doctors say make >> him a medical doctor? > > Moron......a quack doctor’s book has no real life support. Oh a quack doctor can "reinterpret" medical results to support his "whole new kind of medicine". That's a hallmark of a fraud. Oh, wait, that's what you did. > My book is supported by experiments. Also my book advanced a new theory of gravity > that incompatible with QM and it advanced a new theory of relativity that eliminated the paradoxes of SR. So says the quack about his book -- it solves all the unknown problems of medicine. Is he now a doctor? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-19 11:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5aac1e75-233c-4c28-9b61-4ec6e936fae4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423016 |
On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 2:03:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 6/19/17 7:16 AM, kenseto wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:32:03 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 6:21:22 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> >>>>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:48:25 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>> .
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a
> >>>>>>>>> new theory of everything.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an
> >>>>>>>> influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It’s done.....it’s the only theory that has the following main features:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As I said, this is an artifact of the mind of a psychopath who believes
> >>>>>> this happens.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No moron it is the mind of a logical scientist.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Tough to shake delusions, isn't it?
> >>>> Let's go back to the quack doctor. There's a guy who never went to medical
> >>>> school and never read any books about medicine. Is he a medical doctor?
> >>>>
> >>>> Now he says he rejects all the writings in medical books and writes his own
> >>>> book, calling it inventing a whole new kind of medicine. He self-publishes
> >>>> this book and puts it up on Amazon. Is he now a medical doctor?
> >>>
> >>> Moron you can’t equate physicists to medical doctors. Doctors don’t
> >>> operate on non-existing models whereas physicists dream up non-existing
> >>> models such as extra dimensions, virtual particles, curvature in spacetime.....etc.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Not gonna fly, Ken. The quack doctor doesn't believe what doctors say
> >> either. This is why he wrote the book, inventing a whole new kind of
> >> medicine, he says. Does his book and his disbelief of what doctors say make
> >> him a medical doctor?
> >
> > Moron......a quack doctor’s book has no real life support.
>
> Oh a quack doctor can "reinterpret" medical results to support his
> "whole new kind of medicine". That's a hallmark of a fraud. Oh, wait,
> that’s what you did.
No moron.....I did more than reinterpreting. The model of physics I invented give rise to the following features:
_ It offers a realistic origin of the universe.
_ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters.
_ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes.
_ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature.
_ It can be validated experimentally.
_ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT).
_ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity
(DTG)
_ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity
as subsets.
_ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics.
_ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force.
_ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle.
_ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum
experiments.
_ It explains the structures of atoms.
Gee you are so fucking stupid.
>
> > My book is supported by experiments. Also my book advanced a new theory of gravity
> > that incompatible with QM and it advanced a new theory of relativity that eliminated the paradoxes of SR.
>
> So says the quack about his book -- it solves all the unknown problems
> of medicine. Is he now a doctor?
>
>
> --
> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-19 13:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oi958a$uev$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #423024 |
On 6/19/17 1:24 PM, kenseto wrote: > On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 2:03:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 6/19/17 7:16 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:32:03 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 6:21:22 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:48:25 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a >>>>>>>>>>> new theory of everything. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an >>>>>>>>>> influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It’s done.....it’s the only theory that has the following main features: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As I said, this is an artifact of the mind of a psychopath who believes >>>>>>>> this happens. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No moron it is the mind of a logical scientist. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Tough to shake delusions, isn't it? >>>>>> Let's go back to the quack doctor. There's a guy who never went to medical >>>>>> school and never read any books about medicine. Is he a medical doctor? >>>>>> >>>>>> Now he says he rejects all the writings in medical books and writes his own >>>>>> book, calling it inventing a whole new kind of medicine. He self-publishes >>>>>> this book and puts it up on Amazon. Is he now a medical doctor? >>>>> >>>>> Moron you can’t equate physicists to medical doctors. Doctors don’t >>>>> operate on non-existing models whereas physicists dream up non-existing >>>>> models such as extra dimensions, virtual particles, curvature in spacetime.....etc. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Not gonna fly, Ken. The quack doctor doesn't believe what doctors say >>>> either. This is why he wrote the book, inventing a whole new kind of >>>> medicine, he says. Does his book and his disbelief of what doctors say make >>>> him a medical doctor? >>> >>> Moron......a quack doctor’s book has no real life support. >> >> Oh a quack doctor can "reinterpret" medical results to support his >> "whole new kind of medicine". That's a hallmark of a fraud. Oh, wait, >> that’s what you did. > > No moron.....I did more than reinterpreting. The model of physics I invented give rise to the following features: Oh, a quack doctor lists all sorts of sales benefits to his new idea. He's trying to sell his book, after all. Does this make him a doctor? > > _ It offers a realistic origin of the universe. > _ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. > _ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. > _ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature. > _ It can be validated experimentally. > _ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). > _ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity > (DTG) > _ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity > as subsets. > _ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. > _ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. > _ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. > _ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum > experiments. > _ It explains the structures of atoms. And does the fact that you've written a book and you list all sorts of sales benefits make you a physicist? It doesn't make the quack a doctor, does it? > > Gee you are so fucking stupid. > > >> >>> My book is supported by experiments. Also my book advanced a new theory of gravity >>> that incompatible with QM and it advanced a new theory of relativity that eliminated the paradoxes of SR. >> >> So says the quack about his book -- it solves all the unknown problems >> of medicine. Is he now a doctor? >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-21 06:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <001f83a0-421e-4f30-8272-3734c930ac03@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423028 |
On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 2:30:39 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 6/19/17 1:24 PM, kenseto wrote: > > On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 2:03:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 6/19/17 7:16 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>> On Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:32:03 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>>>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 6:21:22 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:48:25 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> . > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Not at all.....I don’t need anybody to teach me physics. I invented a > >>>>>>>>>>> new theory of everything. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> It's the mind of a psychopath who believes that he can dream up an > >>>>>>>>>> influential and important physics theory without ever learning any physics. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> It’s done.....it’s the only theory that has the following main features: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> As I said, this is an artifact of the mind of a psychopath who believes > >>>>>>>> this happens. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No moron it is the mind of a logical scientist. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Tough to shake delusions, isn't it? > >>>>>> Let's go back to the quack doctor. There's a guy who never went to medical > >>>>>> school and never read any books about medicine. Is he a medical doctor? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Now he says he rejects all the writings in medical books and writes his own > >>>>>> book, calling it inventing a whole new kind of medicine. He self-publishes > >>>>>> this book and puts it up on Amazon. Is he now a medical doctor? > >>>>> > >>>>> Moron you can’t equate physicists to medical doctors. Doctors don’t > >>>>> operate on non-existing models whereas physicists dream up non-existing > >>>>> models such as extra dimensions, virtual particles, curvature in spacetime.....etc. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Not gonna fly, Ken. The quack doctor doesn't believe what doctors say > >>>> either. This is why he wrote the book, inventing a whole new kind of > >>>> medicine, he says. Does his book and his disbelief of what doctors say make > >>>> him a medical doctor? > >>> > >>> Moron......a quack doctor’s book has no real life support. > >> > >> Oh a quack doctor can "reinterpret" medical results to support his > >> "whole new kind of medicine". That's a hallmark of a fraud. Oh, wait, > >> that’s what you did. > > > > No moron.....I did more than reinterpreting. The model of physics I invented give rise to the following features: > > Oh, a quack doctor lists all sorts of sales benefits to his new idea. > He's trying to sell his book, after all. > Does this make him a doctor? It makes him a super doctor if his sales benefits are all true. That’s why Model Mechanics is a superior theory over current theories. > > > > > _ It offers a realistic origin of the universe. > > _ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. > > _ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. > > _ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature. > > _ It can be validated experimentally. > > _ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). > > _ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity > > (DTG) > > _ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity > > as subsets. > > _ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. > > _ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. > > _ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. > > _ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum > > experiments. > > _ It explains the structures of atoms. > > And does the fact that you've written a book and you list all sorts of > sales benefits make you a physicist? Sure it does.....Model Mechanics is a superior theory over current theories. It takes a superior physicist to invent such superior theory. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web