Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #420688 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-27 06:49 +1000 |
| Last post | 2017-06-05 00:49 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 159 — 37 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
GPS Again. "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-05-27 06:49 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Ckeho Baùkora <unukn@owyqar.og> - 2017-05-26 21:01 +0000
Re: GPS Again. "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-05-26 15:49 -0700
Re: GPS Again. Ckeho Baùkora <unukn@owyqar.og> - 2017-05-27 09:20 +0000
Re: GPS Again. dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-05-26 15:50 -0700
Re: GPS Again. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 17:58 -0500
GPS Again. "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-05-26 16:14 -0700
GPS Again. "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-05-26 16:38 -0700
Re: GPS Again. xxein1x1@gmail.com - 2017-05-26 16:25 -0700
Re: GPS Again. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-27 00:18 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-05-26 19:51 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Ckeho Baùkora <unukn@owyqar.og> - 2017-05-27 10:37 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-05-30 09:57 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2017-05-30 20:52 +0200
Re: GPS Again. Ernest Rivers <erwm@weicnne.ac> - 2017-05-30 19:17 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-05-30 15:23 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2017-05-30 22:53 +0200
Re: GPS Again. Ernest Schwanenflügel <erwm@wanenf.oa> - 2017-05-30 20:59 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-31 00:42 +0200
Re: GPS Again. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-05-30 19:03 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-30 21:30 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-30 19:01 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Ernest Rivers <erwm@weicnne.ac> - 2017-05-30 19:15 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-09 11:37 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Jim Limey <eeug@dnne.ri> - 2017-06-09 14:32 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-09 12:51 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Kitubu Nkyaku <akntuu@buwkau.kk> - 2017-06-09 18:52 +0000
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-10 09:23 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-10 11:23 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-10 11:21 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Kitubu Nkyaku <akntuu@buwkau.kk> - 2017-06-10 10:42 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-10 19:38 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Nými Icelulózy <ejienm@wzsfwe.ul> - 2017-06-16 11:30 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-16 10:40 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-11 11:11 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-10 21:20 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-11 12:31 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-10 22:40 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-10 23:20 -0500
Re: GPS Again. "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-11 05:14 +1000
Re: GPS Again. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-06-10 22:16 +0200
Re: GPS Again. "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-11 07:19 +1000
Re: GPS Again. xxein1x1@gmail.com - 2017-06-10 16:11 -0700
Re: GPS Again. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-10 18:32 -0700
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-11 14:43 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-13 07:50 -0700
Re: GPS Again. Lolek Atoru <oitiruc@rwuca.oa> - 2017-06-13 20:56 +0000
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-14 09:25 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-13 17:02 -0700
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-14 12:36 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-13 20:04 -0700
Re: GPS Again. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-14 04:43 +0000
Re: GPS Again. "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-14 20:11 +1000
Re: GPS Again. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-14 14:47 +0000
Re: GPS Again. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-06-11 22:35 +0200
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-11 15:44 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-11 18:03 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-11 19:00 -0500
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-12 11:39 +1000
Re: GPS Again. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-12 02:33 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-11 22:42 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-11 23:27 -0500
Re: GPS Again. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-12 04:47 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-12 08:20 -0500
Re: GPS Again. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-12 17:18 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 10:06 -0700
Re: GPS Again. Kotovanich Nzerovu <ivhvruo@wovewvw.ev> - 2017-06-15 17:30 +0000
Re: GPS Again. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-12 18:15 -0400
Re: GPS Again. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-12 22:32 +0000
Re: GPS Again. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-12 20:48 -0400
Re: GPS Again. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-13 01:52 +0000
Re: GPS Again. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-13 19:57 -0400
Re: GPS Again. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-14 00:46 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-12 09:58 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Selina Dieter <uiueeits@wlwtwstd.ci> - 2017-06-12 15:08 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-12 10:37 -0500
Re: GPS Again. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-12 17:21 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Selina Dieter <uiueeits@wlwtwstd.ci> - 2017-06-12 17:40 +0000
Re: GPS Again. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-12 18:05 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Selina Dieter <uiueeits@wlwtwstd.ci> - 2017-06-12 18:19 +0000
Re: GPS Again. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-06-12 19:16 +0000
Re: GPS Again. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-12 19:43 +0000
Re: GPS Again. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-12 18:25 -0400
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-12 18:45 -0500
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-12 10:35 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-12 11:05 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-11 23:29 -0500
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-12 20:12 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-12 13:54 +0200
Re: GPS Again. Selina Dieter <uiueeits@wlwtwstd.ci> - 2017-06-12 12:47 +0000
Re: GPS Again. "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 04:13 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-13 12:59 +1000
Re: GPS Again. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-12 23:03 -0700
Re: GPS Again. "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 04:22 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-13 13:00 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-06-13 13:32 -0500
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-14 10:09 +1000
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-14 09:34 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Серг ио <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-13 18:42 -0500
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-14 12:40 +1000
Re: GPS Again. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-14 04:06 +0000
Re: GPS Again. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-14 01:20 -0700
Re: GPS Again. Sегg iо <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-13 23:19 -0500
Re: GPS Again. Sегg iо <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-13 23:46 -0500
Re: GPS Again. "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-14 20:07 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Sегg iо <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-14 09:17 -0500
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-17 08:26 +1000
Re: GPS Again. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-16 20:40 -0400
Re: GPS Again. Ecembre Abin <umueuu@eibbwaw.ee> - 2017-06-17 08:05 +0000
Re: GPS Again. "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-17 22:20 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-17 07:58 -0500
Re: GPS Again. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-14 17:06 -0400
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-05-31 09:58 +1000
Re: GPS Again. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-05-27 07:36 +0200
Re: GPS Again. "HGW... DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-05-28 10:57 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 07:02 -0700
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-01 09:00 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-31 23:42 +0000
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-01 19:36 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-01 05:33 -0700
Re: GPS Again. "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-02 19:51 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-03 05:10 -0700
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-04 08:08 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-03 15:27 -0700
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-04 08:50 +1000
Re: GPS Again. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-06-03 19:37 -0700
Re: GPS Again. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 07:09 +0200
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-04 16:06 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Prudence Youngs <usue@weuem.ge> - 2017-06-04 11:11 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 14:23 +0200
Re: GPS Again. Prudence Youngs <usue@weuem.ge> - 2017-06-04 12:33 +0000
Re: GPS Again. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-04 18:17 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-04 05:06 -0700
Re: GPS Again. Prudence Youngs <usue@weuem.ge> - 2017-06-04 12:12 +0000
Re: GPS Again. anne <0140519@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 05:32 -0700
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-05 08:48 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-04 16:09 -0700
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-05 11:12 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-04 19:24 -0700
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-05 16:38 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-05 04:49 -0700
Re: GPS Again. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-05 05:53 -0700
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-06 08:38 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-05 20:30 -0700
Re: GPS Again. Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 15:00 +0200
Re: GPS Again. Prudence Youngs <usue@weuem.ge> - 2017-06-04 11:10 +0000
Re: GPS Again. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 13:25 +0000
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-05 08:46 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-04 23:13 +0000
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-05 11:16 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 09:26 -0500
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-06 08:46 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-05 23:17 +0000
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-07 10:11 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 03:04 +0000
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-07 14:58 +1000
Re: GPS Again. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 12:17 -0500
Re: GPS Again. "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-08 09:06 +1000
Re: GPS Again. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-05 00:49 +0000
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
| From | "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-02 19:51 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ogrcc4$1l6u$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #421313 |
On 01/06/17 22:33, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 3:36:36 AM UTC-6, HGW... wrote: >>>> >>>> It has nothing to do with 1905. The fundamental criteria are that all >>>> the orbiting clocks are in absolute synch > > Completely false and vacuous assertion. They are APPROXIMATELY in sync. Naturally, poor idiot. >> and their ephemeres are accurately known. For extreme accuracy, small >> corrections are applied to the signal arrival times depending on whether >> the satellites are rising or falling, proving BaTh. That is a very simple >> correction. > > BaTh is bull plop, as confirmed by all valid experimental evidence as well > as theory: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%e2%80%93Einstein_relation#de_Broglie_relation > > Lambda = h/p, which shows that lambda cannot be invariant since p is not > constant. Anyone who doesn't have baloney for brains knows this. define your 'lambda', idiot! >>>> You wont be informed of that because the CIA and NASA don't want the >>>> rest of the world to know that the signal speed is source dependent and >>>> that Einstein's theory is bullshit from start to finish. >>>> > > Demented conspiracy "theorist" :-))) poor little gawy....doesn't understand physics at all. >>> Wow. Such nuttery goodness. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-03 05:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4f781b0d-944e-4ec1-8d59-b50518690098@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #421388 |
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 3:49:59 AM UTC-6, HGW, DSc. wrote: > > On 01/06/17 22:33, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 3:36:36 AM UTC-6, HGW... wrote: > > > > > > It has nothing to do with 1905. The fundamental criteria are that all > > > the orbiting clocks are in absolute synch > > > > Completely false and vacuous assertion. They are APPROXIMATELY in sync. > > Naturally, poor idiot. Then say what you mean and mean what you say, dishonest weasel. > > > and their ephemeres are accurately known. For extreme accuracy, small > > > corrections are applied to the signal arrival times depending on whether > > > the satellites are rising or falling, proving BaTh. That is a very simple > > > correction. > > > > BaTh is bull plop, as confirmed by all valid experimental evidence as well > > as theory: > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%e2%80%93Einstein_relation#de_Broglie_relation > > > > Lambda = h/p, which shows that lambda cannot be invariant since p is not > > constant. Anyone who doesn't have baloney for brains knows this. > > define your 'lambda', idiot! Wavelength, stupid fool. EVERYONE knows that except delusional ballistic theory fanatics. > > > You wont be informed of that because the CIA and NASA don't want the > > > rest of the world to know that the signal speed is source dependent and > > > that Einstein's theory is bullshit from start to finish. > > > > Demented conspiracy "theorist" :-))) > > poor little gawy....doesn't understand physics at all. Poor widdle delusional Walphie-boy, doesn't understand that DirtyBaThWater is refuted daily and is NOT physics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "HGW..." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 08:08 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ogvc11$1ntp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #421478 |
On 03/06/17 22:10, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 3:49:59 AM UTC-6, HGW, DSc. wrote: >>>> It has nothing to do with 1905. The fundamental criteria are that all >>>> the orbiting clocks are in absolute synch >>> >>> Completely false and vacuous assertion. They are APPROXIMATELY in sync. >> >> Naturally, poor idiot. > > Then say what you mean and mean what you say, dishonest weasel. poor widdle gawy...still just as stupid as ever! >>> Lambda = h/p, which shows that lambda cannot be invariant since p is not >>> constant. Anyone who doesn't have baloney for brains knows this. >> >> define your 'lambda', idiot! > > Wavelength, stupid fool. EVERYONE knows that except delusional ballistic > theory fanatics. define 'wavelength', poor fool.... --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-03 15:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f2f12455-c93f-4898-8355-b830d1cc7e2e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #421498 |
On Saturday, June 3, 2017 at 4:08:37 PM UTC-6, HGW... wrote: > > On 03/06/17 22:10, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 3:49:59 AM UTC-6, HGW, DSc. wrote: > > > > > > > >It has nothing to do with 1905. The fundamental criteria are that all > > > > > the orbiting clocks are in absolute synch > > > > > > > > Completely false and vacuous assertion. They are APPROXIMATELY in sync. > > > > > > Naturally, poor idiot. > > > > Then say what you mean and mean what you say, dishonest weasel. > > poor widdle gawy...still just as stupid as ever! Typical response of dishonest little Ralphie-boy when caught in a lie. > > > > Lambda = h/p, which shows that lambda cannot be invariant since p is not > > > > constant. Anyone who doesn't have baloney for brains knows this. > > > > > > define your 'lambda', idiot! > > > > Wavelength, stupid fool. EVERYONE knows that except delusional ballistic > > theory fanatics. > > define 'wavelength', poor fool.... The equation Lambda = h/p DEFINES wavelength. Are you totally so math incompetent that you don't know what an equals sign means? Have you never measured standing waves on a slotted line? Good grief! What an ignoramus!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "HGW..." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 08:50 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ogvefh$1rc4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #421499 |
On 04/06/17 08:27, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Saturday, June 3, 2017 at 4:08:37 PM UTC-6, HGW... wrote: >>>>> Completely false and vacuous assertion. They are APPROXIMATELY in sync. >>>> >>>> Naturally, poor idiot. >>> >>> Then say what you mean and mean what you say, dishonest weasel. >> >> poor widdle gawy...still just as stupid as ever! > > Typical response of dishonest little Ralphie-boy when caught in a lie. > >>>>> Lambda = h/p, which shows that lambda cannot be invariant since p is not >>>>> constant. Anyone who doesn't have baloney for brains knows this. >>>> >>>> define your 'lambda', idiot! >>> >>> Wavelength, stupid fool. EVERYONE knows that except delusional ballistic >>> theory fanatics. >> >> define 'wavelength', poor fool.... > > The equation Lambda = h/p DEFINES wavelength. Are you totally so math > incompetent that you don't know what an equals sign means? Have you never > measured standing waves on a slotted line? Good grief! What an ignoramus! You poor little maladjusted gremlin! Define p. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-03 19:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1f90df29-3a09-49b3-b8f5-c6f2e01cce6c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #421500 |
On Saturday, June 3, 2017 at 3:50:29 PM UTC-7, HGW... wrote: > On 04/06/17 08:27, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > On Saturday, June 3, 2017 at 4:08:37 PM UTC-6, HGW... wrote: > > >>>>> Completely false and vacuous assertion. They are APPROXIMATELY in sync. > >>>> > >>>> Naturally, poor idiot. > >>> > >>> Then say what you mean and mean what you say, dishonest weasel. > >> > >> poor widdle gawy...still just as stupid as ever! > > > > Typical response of dishonest little Ralphie-boy when caught in a lie. > > > >>>>> Lambda = h/p, which shows that lambda cannot be invariant since p is not > >>>>> constant. Anyone who doesn't have baloney for brains knows this. > >>>> > >>>> define your 'lambda', idiot! > >>> > >>> Wavelength, stupid fool. EVERYONE knows that except delusional ballistic > >>> theory fanatics. > >> > >> define 'wavelength', poor fool.... > > > > The equation Lambda = h/p DEFINES wavelength. Are you totally so math > > incompetent that you don't know what an equals sign means? Have you never > > measured standing waves on a slotted line? Good grief! What an ignoramus! > > You poor little maladjusted gremlin! Define p. Looks like major back-peddling to me, Ralph. Unable to hold up your end of the argument?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 07:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <oh04ge$uhe$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #421502 |
Dne 04/06/2017 v 04:37 pnalsing@gmail.com napsal(a): > On Saturday, June 3, 2017 at 3:50:29 PM UTC-7, HGW... wrote: >> On 04/06/17 08:27, Gary Harnagel wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Lambda = h/p, which shows that lambda cannot be invariant since p is not >>>>>>> constant. Anyone who doesn't have baloney for brains knows this. >>>>>> >>>>>> define your 'lambda', idiot! >>>>> >>>>> Wavelength, stupid fool. EVERYONE knows that except delusional ballistic >>>>> theory fanatics. >>>> >>>> define 'wavelength', poor fool.... >>> >>> The equation Lambda = h/p DEFINES wavelength. Are you totally so math >>> incompetent that you don't know what an equals sign means? Have you never >>> measured standing waves on a slotted line? Good grief! What an ignoramus! >> >> You poor little maladjusted gremlin! Define p. > > Looks like major back-peddling to me, Ralph. Unable to hold up your end of the argument? Rather worse: Unable to admit he was wrong, as seen over the years. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "HGW..." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 16:06 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <oh0823$r81$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #421503 |
On 04/06/17 15:09, Poutnik wrote: > Dne 04/06/2017 v 04:37 pnalsing@gmail.com napsal(a): >>> >>> You poor little maladjusted gremlin! Define p. >> >> Looks like major back-peddling to me, Ralph. Unable to hold up your end of the argument? > > Rather worse: Unable to admit he was wrong, as seen over the years. Harnagel's definition of wavelength: L=c/p Harnagel's definition of p: p = c/L HAHAHHAHHA! WHAT A PACK OF MORONS ARE THE DINGLEBERRIES OF THIS ng! HhhahhhahhahhhahhahhHAHHHAHHAHGHOHOOHOOOHOOOHAHAHHHAHHAH1 --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prudence Youngs <usue@weuem.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 11:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oh0pt9$2l1$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #421504 |
HGW... wrote: > On 04/06/17 15:09, Poutnik wrote: >> Dne 04/06/2017 v 04:37 pnalsing@gmail.com napsal(a): > > >>>> You poor little maladjusted gremlin! Define p. >>> >>> Looks like major back-peddling to me, Ralph. Unable to hold up your >>> end of the argument? >> >> Rather worse: Unable to admit he was wrong, as seen over the years. > > Harnagel's definition of wavelength: L=c/p Harnagel's definition of p: p > = c/L > > HAHAHHAHHA! WHAT A PACK OF MORONS ARE THE DINGLEBERRIES OF THIS ng! > HhhahhhahhahhhahhahhHAHHHAHHAHGHOHOOHOOOHOOOHAHAHHHAHHAH1 unemployed academia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 14:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <oh0tu1$7a3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #421513 |
Dne 04/06/2017 v 13:11 Prudence Youngs napsal(a): > HGW... wrote: > >> On 04/06/17 15:09, Poutnik wrote: >>> Dne 04/06/2017 v 04:37 pnalsing@gmail.com napsal(a): >> >> >>>>> You poor little maladjusted gremlin! Define p. >>>> >>>> Looks like major back-peddling to me, Ralph. Unable to hold up your >>>> end of the argument? >>> >>> Rather worse: Unable to admit he was wrong, as seen over the years. >> >> Harnagel's definition of wavelength: L=c/p Harnagel's definition of p: p >> = c/L >> >> HAHAHHAHHA! WHAT A PACK OF MORONS ARE THE DINGLEBERRIES OF THIS ng! >> HhhahhhahhahhhahhahhHAHHHAHHAHGHOHOOHOOOHOOOHAHAHHHAHHAH1 > > unemployed academia. > Fixed idea of a nymshifting troll. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) A wise man guards words he says, as they say about him more, than he says about the subject.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prudence Youngs <usue@weuem.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 12:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oh0una$2l1$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #421519 |
Poutnik wrote: >>> HAHAHHAHHA! WHAT A PACK OF MORONS ARE THE DINGLEBERRIES OF THIS ng! >>> HhhahhhahhahhhahhahhHAHHHAHHAHGHOHOOHOOOHOOOHAHAHHHAHHAH1 >> >> unemployed academia. >> > Fixed idea of a nymshifting troll. Moi, a 'nymshifting' troll?? You just said the dimensions are differing in Units Systems. You must be an unemployed drop-out, not an academia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 18:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oh1is9$uo7$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #421522 |
Prudence Youngs <usue@weuem.ge> writes: >Poutnik wrote: >>>> HAHAHHAHHA! WHAT A PACK OF MORONS ARE THE DINGLEBERRIES OF THIS ng! >>>> HhhahhhahhahhhahhahhHAHHHAHHAHGHOHOOHOOOHOOOHAHAHHHAHHAH1 >>> >>> unemployed academia. >>> >> Fixed idea of a nymshifting troll. >Moi, a 'nymshifting' troll?? Yes, you, the nymshifting troll. Now run off, little troll, and shift your nym again. It's the only thing you know how to do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 05:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e0b4b6d3-8b7f-45e6-9a66-55729a4f88c4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #421504 |
On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 12:07:02 AM UTC-6, HGW... wrote: > > On 04/06/17 15:09, Poutnik wrote: > > > > Dne 04/06/2017 v 04:37 pnalsing@gmail.com napsal(a): > > > > > > Looks like major back-peddling to me, Ralph. Unable to hold up your end > > > of the argument? > > > > Rather worse: Unable to admit he was wrong, as seen over the years. > > Harnagel's definition of wavelength: L=c/p > Harnagel's definition of p: p = c/L > > HAHAHHAHHA! WHAT A PACK OF MORONS ARE THE DINGLEBERRIES OF THIS ng! > HhhahhhahhahhhahhahhHAHHHAHHAHGHOHOOHOOOHOOOHAHAHHHAHHAH1 Ralphie-boy gets it wrong every time he twiddles his fingers on a keyboard. The equation is Lambda = h/p, there is no "c" in it. And everyone with an ounce of neurons knows that p = sqrt[E^2 - (m*c^2)^2]/c, not "c/L." Ralphie-boy makes so many stupid mistakes and intentional blunders that he is unemployable even as a clock watcher.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Prudence Youngs <usue@weuem.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 12:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oh0tek$2l1$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #421517 |
Gary Harnagel wrote: > The equation is Lambda = h/p, there is no "c" in it. And everyone with > an ounce of neurons knows that p = sqrt[E^2 - (m*c^2)^2]/c, not "c/L." From which coloured book?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | anne <0140519@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 05:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <abab0e12-d753-49f7-807c-f33bd0a1ac68@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #421518 |
On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 1:12:08 PM UTC+1, Prudence Youngs wrote: > Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > The equation is Lambda = h/p, there is no "c" in it. And everyone with > > an ounce of neurons knows that p = sqrt[E^2 - (m*c^2)^2]/c, not "c/L." > > From which coloured book? https://www.amazon.com/How-Teach-Relativity-Your-Dog/dp/0465023312/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "HGW..." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-05 08:48 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <oh22n5$t6c$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #421517 |
On 04/06/17 22:06, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 12:07:02 AM UTC-6, HGW... wrote: >>> >>> Rather worse: Unable to admit he was wrong, as seen over the years. >> >> Harnagel's definition of wavelength: L=c/p >> Harnagel's definition of p: p = c/L >> >> HAHAHHAHHA! WHAT A PACK OF MORONS ARE THE DINGLEBERRIES OF THIS ng! >> HhhahhhahhahhhahhahhHAHHHAHHAHGHOHOOHOOOHOOOHAHAHHHAHHAH1 > > Henrie-boy gets it wrong every time he twiddles his fingers on a keyboard. > The equation is Lambda = h/p, there is no "c" in it. And everyone with an > ounce of neurons knows that p = sqrt[E^2 - (m*c^2)^2]/c, not "c/L." > > Henrie-boy makes so many stupid mistakes and intentional blunders that > he is unemployable even as a clock watcher. Define E, widdle fellow.... --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 16:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <742d6bcc-11c0-44fc-821b-040cad5a5381@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #421556 |
On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 4:48:09 PM UTC-6, HGW... wrote: > > On 04/06/17 22:06, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > Stupid ignorant Ralphie-boy gets it wrong every time he twiddles his > > fingers on a keyboard. > > The equation is Lambda = h/p, there is no "c" in it. And everyone with an > > ounce of neurons knows that p = sqrt[E^2 - (m*c^2)^2]/c, not "c/L." > > > > Stupid ignorant Ralphie-boy makes so many stupid mistakes and intentional > > blunders that he is unemployable even as a clock watcher. > > Define E, widdle fellow.... Oh, poor bwainless stupid Walphie-boy can't figuwe out that E stands for energy. You know, something his bwain doesn't have. Someday, a twuck will hit him and then he'll learn what energy means.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "HGW..." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-05 11:12 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <oh2b6c$186u$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #421560 |
On 05/06/17 09:09, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 4:48:09 PM UTC-6, HGW... wrote: >> >> On 04/06/17 22:06, Gary Harnagel wrote: >>> >>> Stupid ignorant Ralphie-boy gets it wrong every time he twiddles his >>> fingers on a keyboard. >>> The equation is Lambda = h/p, there is no "c" in it. And everyone with an >>> ounce of neurons knows that p = sqrt[E^2 - (m*c^2)^2]/c, not "c/L." >>> >>> Stupid ignorant Ralphie-boy makes so many stupid mistakes and intentional >>> blunders that he is unemployable even as a clock watcher. >> >> Define E, widdle fellow.... > > Oh, poor bwainless stupid Walphie-boy can't figuwe out that E stands for > energy. You know, something his bwain doesn't have. Someday, a twuck > will hit him and then he'll learn what energy means. poor widdle gawy is an expet on all forms of bullshit but can't define the energy of light. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-04 19:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <502d877d-55fc-4810-a823-77d063ca14f1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #421572 |
On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 7:12:48 PM UTC-6, HGW... wrote: > > On 05/06/17 09:09, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 4:48:09 PM UTC-6, HGW... wrote: > > > > > > Define E, widdle fellow.... > > > > Oh, poor bwainless stupid Walphie-boy can't figuwe out that E stands for > > energy. You know, something his bwain doesn't have. Someday, a twuck > > will hit him and then he'll learn what energy means. > > poor widdle gawy is an expet on all forms of bullshit but can't define > the energy of light. You didn't ASK for light energy, mutton-butt. Are straw man zingers all you have? EVERYONE but stupid little Ralphie-boy knows that E = p*c for light. Stupid ignorant Ralphie-boy probably thinks solar panels work by phlogiston. > You seem to be claiming that all light has the same wavelength...as does > sound, water and all other traveling waves. Really?! Stupid ignorant Ralphie-boy believes that all sound waves and other "traveling waves" have the same wavelength? I knew he was stupid but this represents a new low for him. If anyone needed more proof that he was no scientist, they have it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "HGW..." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-05 16:38 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <oh2u8h$1gp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #421574 |
On 05/06/17 12:24, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 7:12:48 PM UTC-6, HGW... wrote: >> >> poor widdle gawy is an expert on all forms of bullshit but can't define >> the energy of light. > > You didn't ASK for light energy, mutton-butt. Are straw man zingers all > you have? EVERYONE but stupid little Henrie-boy knows that E = p*c for > light. Stupid ignorant Henrie-boy probably thinks solar panels work by > phlogiston. > >> You seem to be claiming that all light has the same wavelength...as does >> sound, water and all other traveling waves. > > Really?! Stupid ignorant Henrie-boy believes that all sound waves and > other "traveling waves" have the same wavelength? I knew he was stupid > but this represents a new low for him. If anyone needed more proof > that he was no scientist, they have it. poor widdle gawy...agrees with Bodkin that "Wavelength is the smallest spatial periodicity at a FIXEDinstant of time". --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web