Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #419246 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-12 13:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-05-16 16:15 -0500 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 63 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-12 13:11 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 15:18 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-13 06:37 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 13:54 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-14 06:43 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-14 16:59 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-15 05:56 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 08:03 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-15 10:06 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 12:14 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 15:20 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-13 02:37 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-13 16:05 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-13 06:52 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-13 16:14 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-13 09:21 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Houchiko Inatsuki <uatci@swckskuwe.io> - 2017-05-14 12:47 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-14 15:11 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 13:56 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-14 06:50 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Houchiko Inatsuki <uatci@swckskuwe.io> - 2017-05-14 13:58 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-14 15:19 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-14 17:02 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-15 06:07 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 08:24 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-15 09:39 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 11:52 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-15 10:15 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 12:55 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-16 04:21 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 10:43 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-16 12:32 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 16:14 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-17 05:50 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 11:15 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-15 23:26 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-05-12 20:16 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-13 07:07 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-13 01:41 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-13 20:01 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 21:17 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 09:57 +0200
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 07:14 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 16:37 +0200
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Houchiko Inatsuki <uatci@swckskuwe.io> - 2017-05-13 14:54 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-13 08:01 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Houchiko Inatsuki <uatci@swckskuwe.io> - 2017-05-13 15:08 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 14:39 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-16 04:51 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe 01405 <0140519@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 06:22 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-17 05:44 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 11:07 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-17 18:41 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-16 15:27 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 10:42 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-16 12:29 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 16:13 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-17 05:57 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 11:18 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-17 18:30 +0000
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 10:48 -0500
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-16 12:36 -0700
Re: Unbounded math rules lead to a failed and unphysical model of our universe Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 16:15 -0500
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-16 10:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <off70q$pc8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #419621 |
On 5/16/17 6:51 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 3:39:27 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 5/12/17 3:11 PM, kenseto wrote: >>> I believe that there is one description of our universe that can give physical explanations for all the observed processes and interactions in our universe. I >>> invented the Pyramid Technique for doing physics to find this ultimate description. >> >> I wonder, Ken, how it is that you think you as an ordinary man can make >> a revolutionary advance in physics, even though you have not studied any >> physics, even though you are not even clear on what the scientific >> method is, even though you cannot do fourth-grade mathematics, and even >> though you have no idea how to design and run a science experiment. > > Hey moron....I have a theory on physics and cosmology and I put it in a book. I copyrighted my theory and the copyright reviewer said: "I found plenty of > creative original and copyrightable text.” > Isn't it sad, Ken, that you are SO desperate for validation that you will hang the entire value of your work on the report of a single copyright reviewer? Isn't it sad that this is all you have, for all the work you've put into it? Doesn't that tell you something? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-16 12:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f4cf7e8f-86f5-4644-8c8e-d38f204babc7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #419650 |
On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 11:48:45 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 5/16/17 6:51 AM, kenseto wrote: > > On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 3:39:27 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 5/12/17 3:11 PM, kenseto wrote: > >>> I believe that there is one description of our universe that can give physical explanations for all the observed processes and interactions in our universe. I > >>> invented the Pyramid Technique for doing physics to find this ultimate description. > >> > >> I wonder, Ken, how it is that you think you as an ordinary man can make > >> a revolutionary advance in physics, even though you have not studied any > >> physics, even though you are not even clear on what the scientific > >> method is, even though you cannot do fourth-grade mathematics, and even > >> though you have no idea how to design and run a science experiment. > > > > Hey moron....I have a theory on physics and cosmology and I put it in a book. I copyrighted my theory and the copyright reviewer said: "I found plenty of > > creative original and copyrightable text.” > > > > Isn't it sad, Ken, that you are SO desperate for validation that you > will hang the entire value of your work on the report of a single > copyright reviewer? No....you said nobody care about my theory. She is an example that somebody care.....so that refutes your ranting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-16 16:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <offq68$1qdk$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #419665 |
On 5/16/17 2:36 PM, kenseto wrote: > On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 11:48:45 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 5/16/17 6:51 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 3:39:27 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 5/12/17 3:11 PM, kenseto wrote: >>>>> I believe that there is one description of our universe that can give physical explanations for all the observed processes and interactions in our universe. I >>>>> invented the Pyramid Technique for doing physics to find this ultimate description. >>>> >>>> I wonder, Ken, how it is that you think you as an ordinary man can make >>>> a revolutionary advance in physics, even though you have not studied any >>>> physics, even though you are not even clear on what the scientific >>>> method is, even though you cannot do fourth-grade mathematics, and even >>>> though you have no idea how to design and run a science experiment. >>> >>> Hey moron....I have a theory on physics and cosmology and I put it in a book. I copyrighted my theory and the copyright reviewer said: "I found plenty of >>> creative original and copyrightable text.” >>> >> >> Isn't it sad, Ken, that you are SO desperate for validation that you >> will hang the entire value of your work on the report of a single >> copyright reviewer? > > No....you said nobody care about my theory. She is an example that somebody care.....so that refutes your ranting. > She doesn't care about your theory. She cares whether the book is original and demonstrates creativity. She has no interest in whether it represents valid science, nor is it her job to assess that, nor does she have the requisite skills to assess that. You are hanging the entire value of your work on the report of a single copyright reviewer? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web