Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #415693 > unrolled thread

New Gravity Theory

Started bykenseto <setoken@att.net>
First post2017-04-10 06:07 -0700
Last post2017-04-26 13:38 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 175 — 23 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-10 06:07 -0700
    Re: New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-10 15:40 +0000
      Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-10 09:49 -0700
        Re: New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-10 19:09 +0000
    Re: New Gravity Theory Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-10 17:47 +0200
      Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-10 09:53 -0700
        Re: New Gravity Theory Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-12 08:04 +0200
          Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-12 05:51 -0700
            Re: New Gravity Theory Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-12 14:53 +0200
              Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-12 07:32 -0700
                Re: New Gravity Theory Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-12 16:40 +0200
                  Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-12 13:39 -0700
                    Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 16:03 -0700
                      Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 05:04 -0700
                        Re: New Gravity Theory Heki Entouba <buububu@enou3eh.ac> - 2017-04-13 12:09 +0000
                        Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 12:19 -0700
                          Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 23:00 -0700
                            Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 15:02 -0700
                      Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 12:57 -0700
                        Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 15:04 -0700
                          Re: New Gravity Theory Wendi Maddox <ox@awdodww.oe> - 2017-04-14 14:25 +0000
                            Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 15:09 -0700
                              Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-15 10:44 -0700
                          Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-14 08:22 -0700
                        Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 15:07 -0700
                  Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 22:07 -0500
                    Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-17 05:17 -0700
            Re: New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-12 16:00 +0000
              Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 13:13 -0700
    Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 13:40 -0700
      Re: New Gravity Theory "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-04-10 14:52 -0700
        Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-10 15:19 -0700
      Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-10 23:25 -0700
      Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-11 07:39 -0700
        Re: New Gravity Theory Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-04-11 10:15 -0700
          Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-11 10:52 -0700
          Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-11 11:12 -0700
            Re: New Gravity Theory Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-04-11 11:35 -0700
              Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-11 11:41 -0700
              Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-11 21:46 -0700
                Re: New Gravity Theory Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-04-12 04:31 -0700
                  Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-12 06:07 -0700
            Re: New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-11 20:32 +0000
              Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-11 21:51 -0700
                Re: New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-12 16:07 +0000
        Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 20:35 -0700
          Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-11 23:18 -0700
          Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-12 05:45 -0700
            Re: New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-12 16:06 +0000
            Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 10:40 -0700
              Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 05:03 -0700
              Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-13 13:09 -0700
                Re: New Gravity Theory pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 13:17 -0700
                Re: New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-13 21:43 +0000
                Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 15:18 -0700
                  Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-15 01:02 -0700
                  Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-15 12:34 -0700
                    Re: New Gravity Theory Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-04-15 23:07 +0200
                      Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 15:14 -0700
                        Re: New Gravity Theory Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-04-16 10:23 +0200
                          Re: New Gravity Theory Emma Harmony <aymmmaeo@anownwrm.cm> - 2017-04-16 15:05 +0000
                    Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 15:14 -0700
                      Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-16 05:42 -0700
                        Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0700
                          Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-17 06:11 -0700
                            Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 12:37 -0700
                              Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 14:42 -0500
                                Re: New Gravity Theory benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-04-18 18:25 -0400
                                Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-19 05:26 -0700
                                  Re: New Gravity Theory Ward Jenkins <uaar@rwjawr2r.aa> - 2017-04-19 13:08 +0000
                                  Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-19 12:30 -0700
                                    Re: New Gravity Theory Loma Bibee <miube@oeeele.ei> - 2017-04-19 19:34 +0000
                                      Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-19 13:16 -0700
                                        Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-19 13:25 -0700
                                          Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-19 13:45 -0700
                                            Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-19 14:02 -0700
                                            Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-20 07:16 -0700
                                              Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 13:08 -0700
                                                Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-20 14:05 -0700
                                                Re: New Gravity Theory Loma Bibee <miube@oeeele.ei> - 2017-04-20 21:05 +0000
                                                  Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 14:26 -0700
                                                    Re: New Gravity Theory Bordamos Alamidade <dd@dsmdawo.ab> - 2017-05-08 13:44 +0000
                                          Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 06:24 -0700
                                            Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-20 06:50 -0700
                                    Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-19 14:45 -0500
                                    Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-19 13:00 -0700
                                      Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-19 13:22 -0700
                                    Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-19 23:20 -0700
                                  Re: New Gravity Theory Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-20 12:11 +0200
                                    Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-20 07:06 -0700
                                      Re: New Gravity Theory Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-20 16:47 +0200
                                        Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-20 09:56 -0700
                                          Re: New Gravity Theory Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-04-20 23:48 +0200
                                            Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-20 15:13 -0700
                                              Re: New Gravity Theory Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-04-21 10:49 +0200
                                    Re: New Gravity Theory Loma Bibee <miube@oeeele.ei> - 2017-04-20 17:13 +0000
                              Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-18 13:19 -0700
                              Re: New Gravity Theory Ward Jenkins <uaar@rwjawr2r.aa> - 2017-04-19 13:02 +0000
                                Re: New Gravity Theory Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-19 15:40 +0200
                                  Re: New Gravity Theory Loma Bibee <miube@oeeele.ei> - 2017-04-19 18:05 +0000
                          Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-17 06:34 -0700
                            Re: New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-17 16:03 +0000
                              Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-17 13:11 -0700
                                Re: New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-18 01:42 +0000
                                  Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-18 06:17 -0700
                                    Re: New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-18 20:17 +0000
                            Re: New Gravity Theory "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-04-19 20:30 +0200
                              Re: New Gravity Theory Loma Bibee <miube@oeeele.ei> - 2017-04-19 19:37 +0000
                              Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-19 13:19 -0700
                                Re: New Gravity Theory "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-04-20 14:09 +0200
                                  Re: New Gravity Theory Loma Bibee <miube@oeeele.ei> - 2017-04-20 17:12 +0000
                                  Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-20 15:26 -0700
                                  Re: New Gravity Theory Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-25 01:29 +0200
                                    Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-25 10:35 -0700
                                      Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-25 14:21 -0700
                                        Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-26 05:58 -0700
                                          Re: New Gravity Theory Himère Bezuinig <numunenen@wgngiweig.mc> - 2017-04-26 14:26 +0000
                                          Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 10:07 -0500
                                        Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-26 06:53 -0700
                                    Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-26 05:55 -0700
                                      Re: New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-26 17:51 +0000
                                      Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-26 12:30 -0700
                                        Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-27 06:43 -0700
                                          Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 13:02 -0700
                                            Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-27 14:53 -0700
                                              Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-27 14:56 -0700
                                                Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-28 05:37 -0700
                                                  Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 16:44 -0700
                                                    Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-29 06:47 -0700
                                                  Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 10:11 -0500
                                                    Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-30 07:49 -0700
                                                      Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 07:59 -0500
                                                        Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-01 11:56 -0700
                                                          Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 14:20 -0500
                                                            Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 14:23 -0500
                                                            Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-01 22:41 -0700
                                                              Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 14:11 -0500
                                                                Re: New Gravity Theory RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-05-02 12:25 -0700
                                                                Re: New Gravity Theory "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-05-03 07:47 +0100
                                            Re: New Gravity Theory "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-04-28 14:18 +0100
                                              Re: New Gravity Theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 17:46 +0200
                                                Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-28 14:43 -0700
                                                  Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 10:12 -0500
                                                    Re: New Gravity Theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 17:23 +0200
                                                      Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-29 13:58 -0700
                                                    Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-29 13:56 -0700
                                                      Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 15:59 -0500
                                                        Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-30 00:55 -0700
                                                          Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 08:01 -0500
                                                            Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-01 22:47 -0700
                                                              Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 14:13 -0500
                                                                Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-03 04:01 -0700
                                                                  Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 13:04 -0500
                                                          Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 14:25 -0700
                                                            Re: New Gravity Theory mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-05-01 22:52 -0700
                                      Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 10:09 -0500
                                        Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-30 07:42 -0700
                                          Re: New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-04-30 18:19 +0000
                                            Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-30 17:33 -0700
                                              Re: New Gravity Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-01 02:39 +0000
                                          Re: New Gravity Theory Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 07:57 -0500
                              Re: New Gravity Theory Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-19 23:15 +0200
                                Re: New Gravity Theory Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-20 01:21 +0200
                                  Re: New Gravity Theory Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-04-26 20:18 +0200
                                    Re: New Gravity Theory Himère Bezuinig <numunenen@wgngiweig.mc> - 2017-04-26 19:20 +0000
                                Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-04-20 07:44 -0700
                                  Re: New Gravity Theory Loma Bibee <miube@oeeele.ei> - 2017-04-20 17:09 +0000
                                  Re: New Gravity Theory Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-07 02:06 +0200
                                    Re: New Gravity Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-05-07 07:14 -0700
                                      Re: New Gravity Theory Bordamos Alamidade <dd@dsmdawo.ab> - 2017-05-07 14:19 +0000
                                      Re: New Gravity Theory Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-05-07 17:45 +0200
                        Re: New Gravity Theory Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-04-17 10:24 +0200
          Re: New Gravity Theory RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-04-26 13:08 -0700
            Re: New Gravity Theory Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-04-26 22:23 +0200
            Re: New Gravity Theory JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-04-26 13:38 -0700

Page 1 of 9  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Next page →

#415693 — New Gravity Theory

Fromkenseto <setoken@att.net>
Date2017-04-10 06:07 -0700
SubjectNew Gravity Theory
Message-ID<90a519e8-3c0d-447d-8d3e-1de18e2325c3@googlegroups.com>
The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf

DTG is compatible with all the other forces of nature and thus the unification of all the forces of nature becomes feasible.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#415721

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2017-04-10 15:40 +0000
Message-ID<ocg926$o8f$2@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#415693
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes:

>The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
>http://www.mОdelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf

Dear Mr. Seto,

New User here. I wish to read your excellent theory of DTG but your
link doesn't work. Please advise.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#415733

Fromkenseto <setoken@att.net>
Date2017-04-10 09:49 -0700
Message-ID<372b3d49-9ce8-4e83-b74b-5497523ed1c5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#415721
On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 11:40:56 AM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote:
> kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes:
> 
> >The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
> >http://www.mОdelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
> 
> Dear Mr. Seto,
> 
> New User here. I wish to read your excellent theory of DTG but your
> link doesn't work. Please advise.

Moron, you changed the link address. The correct link in my post that started this thread is as follows:
http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf

Gee you are so fucking stupid no wonder your name is Moron-y

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#415755

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2017-04-10 19:09 +0000
Message-ID<ocgl99$a15$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#415733
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes:

>> New User here. I wish to read your excellent theory of DTG but your
>> link doesn't work. Please advise.

>Moron, you changed the link address. The correct link in my post that start>ed this thread is as follows:
>http://www.modelmechаnics.org/2015gravity.pdf

Dear Mr. Seto,

Please help me as I am a new user. Your link still doesn't work.
Can you please help me?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#415725

FromPython <python@example.invalid>
Date2017-04-10 17:47 +0200
Message-ID<ocg9dv$810$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#415693
Le 10/04/2017 à 15:07, kenseto a écrit :
> The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
>
> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf

The link does not work Mr Seto.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#415734

Fromkenseto <setoken@att.net>
Date2017-04-10 09:53 -0700
Message-ID<f3ef517b-60c2-4344-96f4-944a8b80d4f7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#415725
On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 11:47:14 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> Le 10/04/2017 à 15:07, kenseto a écrit :
> > The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
> >
> > http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
> 
> The link does not work Mr Seto.

Idiot, you changed the link address. The correct link in my post that started this thread is as follows:
http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#415988

FromPython <python@example.invalid>
Date2017-04-12 08:04 +0200
Message-ID<ockg0t$cha$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#415734
kenseto wrote:
> On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 11:47:14 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
>> Le 10/04/2017 à 15:07, kenseto a écrit :
>>> The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
>>>
>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
>>
>> The link does not work Mr Seto.
>
> Idiot, you changed the link address. The correct link in my post that started this thread is as follows:
> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf

Look carefully, Mr Seto. I didn't change a single letter or digit in
the original link.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#416003

Fromkenseto <setoken@att.net>
Date2017-04-12 05:51 -0700
Message-ID<48a0b9be-3cdc-4d46-a189-f9606a4febae@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#415988
On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 2:04:15 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> kenseto wrote:
> > On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 11:47:14 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> >> Le 10/04/2017 à 15:07, kenseto a écrit :
> >>> The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
> >>>
> >>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
> >>
> >> The link does not work Mr Seto.
> >
> > Idiot, you changed the link address. The correct link in my post that started this thread is as follows:
> > http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf
> 
> Look carefully, Mr Seto. I didn't change a single letter or digit in
> the original link.

Hey moron, why did you need to provide a new link? Why not just click on to the link I provided?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#416004

FromPython <python@example.invalid>
Date2017-04-12 14:53 +0200
Message-ID<ocl815$1mbl$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#416003
kenseto wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 2:04:15 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
>> kenseto wrote:
>>> On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 11:47:14 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
>>>> Le 10/04/2017 à 15:07, kenseto a écrit :
>>>>> The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
>>>>>
>>>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
>>>>
>>>> The link does not work Mr Seto.
>>>
>>> Idiot, you changed the link address. The correct link in my post that started this thread is as follows:
>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
>>
>> Look carefully, Mr Seto. I didn't change a single letter or digit in
>> the original link.
>
> Hey moron, why did you need to provide a new link? Why not just click on to the link I provided?

I quoted your link, Mr Seto.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#416037

Fromkenseto <setoken@att.net>
Date2017-04-12 07:32 -0700
Message-ID<899ae208-74e1-48f8-98f9-82fedaba1004@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#416004
On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 8:54:01 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> kenseto wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 2:04:15 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> >> kenseto wrote:
> >>> On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 11:47:14 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> >>>> Le 10/04/2017 à 15:07, kenseto a écrit :
> >>>>> The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
> >>>>
> >>>> The link does not work Mr Seto.
> >>>
> >>> Idiot, you changed the link address. The correct link in my post that started this thread is as follows:
> >>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
> >>
> >> Look carefully, Mr Seto. I didn't change a single letter or digit in
> >> the original link.
> >
> > Hey moron, why did you need to provide a new link? Why not just click on to the link I provided?
> 
> I quoted your link, Mr Seto.

No you didn't.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#416038

FromPython <python@example.invalid>
Date2017-04-12 16:40 +0200
Message-ID<ocle86$1mk$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#416037
kenseto wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 8:54:01 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
>> kenseto wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 2:04:15 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
>>>> kenseto wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 11:47:14 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
>>>>>> Le 10/04/2017 à 15:07, kenseto a écrit :
>>>>>>> The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The link does not work Mr Seto.
>>>>>
>>>>> Idiot, you changed the link address. The correct link in my post that started this thread is as follows:
>>>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Look carefully, Mr Seto. I didn't change a single letter or digit in
>>>> the original link.
>>>
>>> Hey moron, why did you need to provide a new link? Why not just click on to the link I provided?
>>
>> I quoted your link, Mr Seto.
>
> No you didn't.

Could you spot the difference(s) then, Mr Seto?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#416062

Fromkenseto <setoken@att.net>
Date2017-04-12 13:39 -0700
Message-ID<19834325-5d38-43e1-9e19-dea1a3c8e246@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#416038
On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 10:40:10 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> kenseto wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 8:54:01 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> >> kenseto wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 2:04:15 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> >>>> kenseto wrote:
> >>>>> On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 11:47:14 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> >>>>>> Le 10/04/2017 à 15:07, kenseto a écrit :
> >>>>>>> The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The link does not work Mr Seto.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Idiot, you changed the link address. The correct link in my post that started this thread is as follows:
> >>>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
> >>>>
> >>>> Look carefully, Mr Seto. I didn't change a single letter or digit in
> >>>> the original link.
> >>>
> >>> Hey moron, why did you need to provide a new link? Why not just click on to the link I provided?
> >>
> >> I quoted your link, Mr Seto.
> >
> > No you didn't.
> 
> Could you spot the difference(s) then, Mr Seto?

I have no time for your game....Bye.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#416074

FromJanPB <filmart@gmail.com>
Date2017-04-12 16:03 -0700
Message-ID<1a1b0ee7-4248-4bc0-84a2-865bdf14134a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#416062
On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 1:39:31 PM UTC-7, kenseto wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 10:40:10 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> > kenseto wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 8:54:01 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> > >> kenseto wrote:
> > >>> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 2:04:15 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> > >>>> kenseto wrote:
> > >>>>> On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 11:47:14 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> > >>>>>> Le 10/04/2017 à 15:07, kenseto a écrit :
> > >>>>>>> The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The link does not work Mr Seto.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Idiot, you changed the link address. The correct link in my post that started this thread is as follows:
> > >>>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Look carefully, Mr Seto. I didn't change a single letter or digit in
> > >>>> the original link.
> > >>>
> > >>> Hey moron, why did you need to provide a new link? Why not just click on to the link I provided?
> > >>
> > >> I quoted your link, Mr Seto.
> > >
> > > No you didn't.
> > 
> > Could you spot the difference(s) then, Mr Seto?
> 
> I have no time for your game....Bye.

I see. You cannot answer a simple question designed to see if you CAN know
what you are talking about.

This invalidates everything you say. You can post as many responses here
as you please - it's all junk and nonsense from start to finish. You are
wasting your life away on a mirage. Physics just isn't for you, pick a
different hobby.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#416113

Frommlwozniak@wp.pl
Date2017-04-13 05:04 -0700
Message-ID<dc465626-6b01-4d11-a3c1-743eb8660ddd@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#416074
W dniu czwartek, 13 kwietnia 2017 01:03:51 UTC+2 użytkownik JanPB napisał:

> I see. You cannot answer a simple question designed to see if you CAN know
> what you are talking about.

Neither you can.
Do you want a quoting, poor idiot?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#416115

FromHeki Entouba <buububu@enou3eh.ac>
Date2017-04-13 12:09 +0000
Message-ID<ocnppv$1pbj$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#416113
mlwozniak wrote:

> W dniu czwartek, 13 kwietnia 2017 01:03:51 UTC+2 użytkownik JanPB
> napisał:
> 
>> I see. You cannot answer a simple question designed to see if you CAN
>> know what you are talking about.
> 
> Neither you can. Do you want a quoting, poor idiot?

This is incorrect. He seemingly is not poor, but a rich capitalist. He 
likely contributes sending X-space (??) rockets into above the atmosphere. 
For profit, not fame. Fame only is for pussies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#416202

FromJanPB <filmart@gmail.com>
Date2017-04-13 12:19 -0700
Message-ID<138ac369-4eec-4bd3-9c80-5ac1847ae3f3@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#416113
On Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 5:04:37 AM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> W dniu czwartek, 13 kwietnia 2017 01:03:51 UTC+2 użytkownik JanPB napisał:
> 
> > I see. You cannot answer a simple question designed to see if you CAN know
> > what you are talking about.
> 
> Neither you can.
> Do you want a quoting, poor idiot?

1. You'll never gain any respect by calling people "poor idiot". It alerts
the readers you have nothing important to say.

2. What you wrote is irrelevant anyway(*): it doesn't matter what _I_ can do
or cannot do. The point is that someone (happened to be me) posted a question
which any person (like Ken) claiming to do what he did MUST be able to answer.

(*)The standard technique of deflecting attention by suddenly discussing
the _messenger_ instead of the _message_.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#416251

Frommlwozniak@wp.pl
Date2017-04-13 23:00 -0700
Message-ID<2aa20f3c-9579-46be-94dd-c5cdca335b34@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#416202
W dniu czwartek, 13 kwietnia 2017 21:19:48 UTC+2 użytkownik JanPB napisał:
> On Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 5:04:37 AM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> > W dniu czwartek, 13 kwietnia 2017 01:03:51 UTC+2 użytkownik JanPB napisał:
> > 
> > > I see. You cannot answer a simple question designed to see if you CAN know
> > > what you are talking about.
> > 
> > Neither you can.
> > Do you want a quoting, poor idiot?
> 
> 1. You'll never gain any respect by calling people "poor idiot". It alerts
> the readers you have nothing important to say.

And, of course, syntax schmyntax. Right, poor idiot?
> 
> 2. What you wrote is irrelevant anyway(*): it doesn't matter what _I_ can do
> or cannot do. The point is that someone (happened to be me) posted a question
> which any person (like Ken) claiming to do what he did MUST be able to answer.

That's exectly what I'm talking about.
You pretend to be a great mathematician, but
you can't answer correctly a simple question of metric
spaces.
Pathetic.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#416326

FromJanPB <filmart@gmail.com>
Date2017-04-14 15:02 -0700
Message-ID<4282f140-3656-4059-9c36-a9c41696370e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#416251
On Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 11:00:56 PM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> W dniu czwartek, 13 kwietnia 2017 21:19:48 UTC+2 użytkownik JanPB napisał:
> > On Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 5:04:37 AM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> > > W dniu czwartek, 13 kwietnia 2017 01:03:51 UTC+2 użytkownik JanPB napisał:
> > > 
> > > > I see. You cannot answer a simple question designed to see if you CAN know
> > > > what you are talking about.
> > > 
> > > Neither you can.
> > > Do you want a quoting, poor idiot?
> > 
> > 1. You'll never gain any respect by calling people "poor idiot". It alerts
> > the readers you have nothing important to say.
> 
> And, of course, syntax schmyntax. Right, poor idiot?
> > 
> > 2. What you wrote is irrelevant anyway(*): it doesn't matter what _I_ can do
> > or cannot do. The point is that someone (happened to be me) posted a question
> > which any person (like Ken) claiming to do what he did MUST be able to answer.
> 
> That's exectly what I'm talking about.
> You pretend to be a great mathematician, but
> you can't answer correctly a simple question of metric
> spaces.
> Pathetic.

Again, you are desperately trying to change the subject. Which is: if _Ken_
(that's K, e, n, and NOT J, a, n - got it?) cannot calculate that Hamiltonian,
he cannot contribute anything of value to the subject he writes on.

Whether I "pretend" (as you wishfully put it) to be this or that is
not relevant to this discussion. Start a new thread if you want to talk
about new topic.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#416207

Fromkenseto <setoken@att.net>
Date2017-04-13 12:57 -0700
Message-ID<cf596b2b-1ab9-4740-a393-faaf1f9e5636@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#416074
On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 7:03:51 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 1:39:31 PM UTC-7, kenseto wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 10:40:10 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> > > kenseto wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 8:54:01 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> > > >> kenseto wrote:
> > > >>> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 2:04:15 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> > > >>>> kenseto wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 11:47:14 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> > > >>>>>> Le 10/04/2017 à 15:07, kenseto a écrit :
> > > >>>>>>> The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> The link does not work Mr Seto.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Idiot, you changed the link address. The correct link in my post that started this thread is as follows:
> > > >>>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Look carefully, Mr Seto. I didn't change a single letter or digit in
> > > >>>> the original link.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hey moron, why did you need to provide a new link? Why not just click on to the link I provided?
> > > >>
> > > >> I quoted your link, Mr Seto.
> > > >
> > > > No you didn't.
> > > 
> > > Could you spot the difference(s) then, Mr Seto?
> > 
> > I have no time for your game....Bye.
> 
> I see. You cannot answer a simple question designed to see if you CAN know
> what you are talking about.

Hey moron.....why should I waste my time to decipher the changes he made to my link? I provide a link that works and if he doesn't want to use it, that's his problem.
> 
> This invalidates everything you say. You can post as many responses here
> as you please - it's all junk and nonsense from start to finish. You are
> wasting your life away on a mirage. Physics just isn't for you, pick a
> different hobby.

This is an idiotic statement. You are a lying sack of shit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#416232

FromJanPB <filmart@gmail.com>
Date2017-04-13 15:04 -0700
Message-ID<d3e68f5a-4781-4ace-9c7b-92895a283180@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#416207
On Thursday, April 13, 2017 at 12:57:53 PM UTC-7, kenseto wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 7:03:51 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 1:39:31 PM UTC-7, kenseto wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 10:40:10 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> > > > kenseto wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 8:54:01 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> > > > >> kenseto wrote:
> > > > >>> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 2:04:15 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> > > > >>>> kenseto wrote:
> > > > >>>>> On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 11:47:14 AM UTC-4, Python wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> Le 10/04/2017 à 15:07, kenseto a écrit :
> > > > >>>>>>> The paper in the following link describes a new theory of gravity called DTG:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> The link does not work Mr Seto.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Idiot, you changed the link address. The correct link in my post that started this thread is as follows:
> > > > >>>>> http:∕∕www.modelmechanics.org∕2015gravity.pdf
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Look carefully, Mr Seto. I didn't change a single letter or digit in
> > > > >>>> the original link.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Hey moron, why did you need to provide a new link? Why not just click on to the link I provided?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I quoted your link, Mr Seto.
> > > > >
> > > > > No you didn't.
> > > > 
> > > > Could you spot the difference(s) then, Mr Seto?
> > > 
> > > I have no time for your game....Bye.
> > 
> > I see. You cannot answer a simple question designed to see if you CAN know
> > what you are talking about.
> 
> Hey moron.....why should I waste my time to decipher the changes he made to my link? I provide a link that works and if he doesn't want to use it, that's his problem.

You also seem to have reading comprehension problems. I never said anything
about any links.

> > This invalidates everything you say. You can post as many responses here
> > as you please - it's all junk and nonsense from start to finish. You are
> > wasting your life away on a mirage. Physics just isn't for you, pick a
> > different hobby.
> 
> This is an idiotic statement. You are a lying sack of shit.

Why is asking you to prove your credentials an "idiotic statement"? Would
you allow, for example, a random person perform an open heart surgery on you?

No?

So how come you insist you can seriously engage in physics research while
not knowing the basics of physics?

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 9  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web