Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #412260 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-09 07:08 -0800 |
| Last post | 2017-03-29 16:22 -0700 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 36 participants
Thread has 1002 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1002 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 07:08 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 09:53 -0600
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 14:27 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 07:40 -0600
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 18:02 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-11 05:03 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 13:43 -0600
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 12:54 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 16:09 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 22:21 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 07:33 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 07:58 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 10:15 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 23:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 07:49 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 07:50 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 10:11 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 10:32 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 09:01 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 11:05 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 09:39 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 12:33 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-14 21:30 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 15:14 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 03:55 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 08:05 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-09 08:17 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 09:03 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 08:53 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-09 23:04 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 07:03 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Otplate Yuugaku <yu@yotwaglwt.pa> - 2017-03-10 15:08 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 13:56 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-09 23:37 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 15:08 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 07:54 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-10 19:23 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 14:36 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-09 19:47 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-10 18:48 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 04:53 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-03-11 06:08 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 06:52 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-03-11 07:38 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 12:05 -0600
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-10 05:48 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 07:49 -0600
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-10 06:13 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 08:30 -0600
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-10 06:59 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 09:04 -0600
Re: mutual relative time dilation Otplate Yuugaku <yu@yotwaglwt.pa> - 2017-03-10 15:10 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-10 11:20 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 15:43 -0600
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-10 14:40 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 16:54 -0600
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-12 06:51 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-12 15:55 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-12 11:52 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-13 04:51 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-13 05:17 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-13 17:15 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-13 11:25 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 13:38 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-13 20:06 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 07:51 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-15 00:04 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 16:15 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-13 06:13 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 09:00 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-13 15:20 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-13 11:13 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 13:25 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-13 19:57 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 07:53 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-14 06:37 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 08:42 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-14 06:53 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 09:55 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-14 14:10 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 16:30 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-15 07:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 10:28 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-16 06:22 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 08:59 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-17 06:33 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 11:32 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-15 19:25 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-16 06:24 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-14 23:57 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Priscilla Groll <lloi@wgnprlw.sl> - 2017-03-10 23:47 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 17:17 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-10 17:31 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-10 11:39 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-10 21:10 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-10 14:51 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 16:56 -0600
Re: mutual relative time dilation rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 17:24 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-12 04:56 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-12 07:06 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-12 15:41 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-12 11:47 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 15:07 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-13 04:48 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-13 05:27 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-03-13 17:24 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 10:46 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 18:03 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-03-10 17:33 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Jonathan Doolin <good4usoul@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 04:22 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 05:26 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Jonathan Doolin <good4usoul@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 07:20 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Jonathan Doolin <good4usoul@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 07:31 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 09:37 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-11 10:17 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 12:27 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation Jonathan Doolin <good4usoul@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 09:03 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 10:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-11 16:33 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 12:43 -0800
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-12 00:42 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 07:32 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-12 17:10 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 09:24 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-12 11:15 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 11:45 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-12 19:58 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 03:39 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-12 17:39 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 11:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-12 20:16 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 22:19 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-13 05:22 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 08:06 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-13 18:24 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 23:49 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 07:36 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 08:04 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 10:22 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 23:45 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 08:03 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 08:22 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 10:46 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 10:52 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 09:22 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 12:25 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 12:53 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 15:43 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 09:04 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 07:54 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 10:21 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 12:49 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 15:14 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 14:29 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 16:40 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 17:08 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-16 02:01 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 20:40 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 09:46 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 09:56 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 10:57 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 13:36 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 18:46 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 07:00 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 12:03 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 14:18 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 06:59 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 09:52 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 10:52 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-22 10:56 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 13:08 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-17 00:58 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 19:04 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-16 19:59 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 22:18 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-17 09:05 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-17 01:52 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 07:38 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 07:40 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 06:56 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-17 05:15 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-17 05:16 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 07:49 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 11:44 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 17:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 10:20 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-22 09:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 11:18 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 13:49 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-22 12:01 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 09:11 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 11:46 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-17 15:17 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation xxein1x1@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 16:54 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Idimi Higame <iumia@igmwwad.hh> - 2017-03-18 00:08 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation xxein1x1@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 03:35 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Idimi Higame <iumia@igmwwad.hh> - 2017-03-18 15:31 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 17:45 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation xxein1x1@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 03:25 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-17 18:17 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation xxein1x1@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 03:29 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-18 08:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 07:19 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Idimi Higame <iumia@igmwwad.hh> - 2017-03-18 15:27 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 08:58 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Idimi Higame <iumia@igmwwad.hh> - 2017-03-18 16:03 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-18 18:50 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-03-19 06:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 04:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-20 21:54 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-20 15:03 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 16:16 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-21 19:44 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-21 13:49 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 16:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 17:15 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-17 18:06 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 21:45 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-18 04:29 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-18 06:23 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-18 06:30 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 07:30 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 10:33 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 11:42 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 14:25 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 07:26 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-18 07:47 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 09:34 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-18 11:38 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-18 21:34 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-18 13:54 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-18 14:16 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 00:40 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-19 04:17 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 00:43 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 10:36 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 11:43 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 14:31 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 04:55 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-20 05:22 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 06:52 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 06:53 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 07:20 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-20 07:48 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 07:57 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-20 08:31 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 12:39 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-20 13:16 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 13:52 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-03-20 17:02 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 23:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-03-21 06:59 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-21 08:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-21 08:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 10:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-21 11:13 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Oretha Moorhead <traaho@maaodrd.oe> - 2017-03-21 18:35 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-21 12:01 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Oretha Moorhead <traaho@maaodrd.oe> - 2017-03-21 19:09 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 09:59 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-03-21 12:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 14:24 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation xxein1x1@gmail.com - 2017-03-21 15:07 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 18:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-03-21 17:21 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 20:47 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-03-22 04:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 07:42 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 10:43 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-22 09:46 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 13:06 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 15:52 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 14:17 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 16:45 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 14:58 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 17:18 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 03:15 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 09:55 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 10:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 12:34 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 11:58 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 14:24 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 12:37 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 15:05 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 13:38 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 16:28 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 16:34 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 16:47 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 07:18 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 08:05 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 10:37 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 12:16 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 15:09 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 13:25 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 15:50 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 17:53 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 13:58 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 16:19 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 18:17 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-03-25 03:07 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 19:20 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 13:59 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 13:39 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 16:12 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 17:33 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:01 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 19:15 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 15:18 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 13:41 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 13:03 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 13:58 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 12:18 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 14:31 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 13:02 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 15:15 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 13:24 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 13:17 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 15:34 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 16:26 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 07:22 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-23 10:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 16:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-03-21 18:39 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 20:59 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-22 02:48 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 20:42 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-20 19:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 23:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-21 04:56 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 09:17 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-21 12:57 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 16:55 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 10:28 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 11:31 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 13:58 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-17 05:03 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-17 05:19 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-17 09:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 21:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 10:48 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 13:08 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 15:33 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 14:21 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 16:34 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 14:52 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 17:12 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 17:53 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 09:40 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 09:59 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 12:18 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 11:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 13:16 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 12:03 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 14:38 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 13:05 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-24 17:05 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 11:59 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-25 08:53 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-25 03:54 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 06:21 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-25 19:05 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 13:45 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-26 08:15 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 00:30 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-26 11:08 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 07:42 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-26 09:34 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 18:06 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-26 20:58 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 22:28 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-27 04:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 21:05 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-28 06:37 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 09:07 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 09:10 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 11:24 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 12:03 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Ottsuki Yo <ukuuu@kuuko.yc> - 2017-03-28 19:05 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 15:05 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 14:51 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 17:22 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-03-28 22:18 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Ottsuki Yo <ukuuu@kuuko.yc> - 2017-03-28 22:21 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 17:25 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-28 10:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 12:10 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 15:19 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 15:02 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 17:27 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-28 18:54 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 19:57 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-26 23:28 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 00:05 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-27 00:14 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 20:46 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:21 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-27 05:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:56 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 10:02 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 10:34 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 13:07 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 12:47 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 15:23 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 22:03 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 07:11 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 08:48 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 11:27 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 12:06 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 15:22 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 15:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 18:09 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 18:32 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 09:02 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 09:36 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 09:26 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 15:09 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 16:02 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 09:47 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 12:09 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 14:37 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 12:59 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 15:28 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 16:49 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkin_odd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 11:32 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 07:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 10:16 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 14:58 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 17:08 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 16:39 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkin_odd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 14:10 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 08:43 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 13:39 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 12:02 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 09:48 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 04:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 13:41 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 12:03 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 10:25 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 19:29 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 11:52 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 10:42 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 13:21 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 13:27 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 15:03 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 13:40 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:16 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 15:23 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 17:31 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 15:40 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 17:45 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 08:49 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 08:32 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 11:20 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 09:50 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 12:01 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 10:14 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 12:29 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 14:04 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 16:35 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 15:11 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 19:01 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 18:01 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 18:10 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 09:14 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 09:41 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 12:12 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 11:37 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 14:19 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 14:46 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 17:17 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 15:40 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-07 01:37 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 17:45 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 07:22 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 06:23 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 08:39 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 07:20 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 09:26 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 08:50 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 10:56 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 10:58 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 09:25 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 11:32 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 09:42 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 11:49 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 12:01 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 14:42 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 14:14 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 16:43 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 19:23 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 15:05 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 15:27 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 14:21 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 17:08 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 17:53 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 18:10 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 19:49 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-08 11:04 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-08 10:47 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-09 13:50 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-09 20:30 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 08:03 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 08:17 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 06:33 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 08:40 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 09:13 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 08:20 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 10:30 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 08:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 10:46 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 09:47 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 12:04 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 10:23 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 12:42 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Jolie Osokuro <uuol@oowo.ou> - 2017-04-10 17:55 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 12:06 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 11:52 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 08:14 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 07:39 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 09:57 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 08:54 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 11:17 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 09:30 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 11:45 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 11:55 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 11:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-11 22:07 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 14:31 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 06:11 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 08:23 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 06:41 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 09:00 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 07:08 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 09:13 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 08:30 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-12 22:20 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 19:27 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 17:15 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 19:30 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:10 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:54 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 12:38 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 11:08 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 13:17 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 02:26 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 08:39 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 08:22 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 12:56 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 19:05 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 14:22 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-15 23:44 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 22:19 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 07:45 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 08:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 18:48 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 18:21 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 07:56 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 08:29 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 04:15 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 08:11 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 05:45 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 08:42 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-23 07:05 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-23 16:15 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 08:39 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 17:47 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 16:14 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 20:14 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-12 07:48 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 06:35 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-12 16:20 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 08:18 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-12 22:15 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 19:26 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-13 07:54 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 04:19 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-13 13:42 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Heki Entouba <buububu@enou3eh.ac> - 2017-04-13 11:56 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 04:58 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:33 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 10:02 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 04:57 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:10 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 05:26 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Heki Entouba <buububu@enou3eh.ac> - 2017-04-13 12:28 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:38 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:34 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:46 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:26 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:56 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 12:43 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 11:10 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 13:24 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 02:31 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 08:46 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 14:16 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 23:41 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 15:51 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 14:26 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:28 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:57 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 12:46 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 11:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 13:26 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 02:33 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 08:47 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:31 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:58 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 12:50 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 14:01 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 08:16 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 07:25 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 06:20 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 08:28 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 06:42 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 09:02 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 07:10 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 09:20 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 06:49 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 09:07 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-10 21:37 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 12:46 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-10 21:55 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 13:56 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-11 08:14 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 06:43 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-11 10:30 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-11 01:43 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-11 14:48 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-11 06:01 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 07:19 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-11 16:22 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 07:45 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 10:02 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 08:59 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 11:19 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 09:32 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 11:48 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 11:03 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-11 22:04 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 14:29 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-12 07:47 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 06:06 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-11 22:00 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 14:28 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-12 07:44 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 06:26 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 08:34 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-12 15:35 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 07:01 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 06:04 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 08:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 10:19 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 08:32 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-10 22:04 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 13:55 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-11 08:16 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 06:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-11 16:08 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 07:43 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-11 16:48 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 08:50 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 11:05 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 09:15 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 11:35 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 10:57 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-11 22:19 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 14:33 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:08 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:48 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 12:30 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 11:06 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 13:13 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 07:23 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-11 21:57 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 14:27 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 06:02 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2017-04-12 06:14 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 06:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2017-04-12 07:22 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 17:53 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2017-04-12 17:56 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-12 19:35 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2017-04-13 04:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 04:47 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:29 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 05:32 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 11:47 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 11:02 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 13:07 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 09:40 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 09:09 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 10:56 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 13:05 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 13:39 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-13 22:47 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 02:13 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 08:48 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 08:17 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-13 21:47 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 23:04 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-14 08:17 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-13 23:40 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 02:08 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 02:10 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-14 11:50 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 08:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-14 18:08 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 14:35 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:53 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 19:11 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-15 10:36 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 07:11 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-15 16:43 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 10:32 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-15 23:32 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 16:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-16 13:14 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 07:30 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-16 17:34 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Emma Harmony <aymmmaeo@anownwrm.cm> - 2017-04-16 15:37 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-16 17:48 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Dusty Han <uaut@sdwduw.ut> - 2017-04-16 16:00 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 15:55 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 14:29 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 22:21 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:19 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 07:36 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 08:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 18:43 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 17:01 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-18 07:47 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 08:27 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 07:15 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 08:17 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 08:18 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 13:06 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 10:04 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 12:51 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-13 14:02 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 08:16 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 08:15 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 13:00 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 19:10 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 15:53 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-15 14:28 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-12 07:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 10:03 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-11 08:18 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 09:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 11:23 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-04-11 08:16 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 06:22 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 08:34 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 08:06 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 10:13 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 08:28 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 10:40 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 09:43 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 08:23 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 10:35 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 08:39 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 10:43 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 09:42 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 12:06 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 10:32 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 12:54 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 11:58 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 08:15 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 07:42 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 10:00 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 08:57 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 14:25 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 19:35 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 19:27 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 14:18 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 16:21 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-07 19:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 11:32 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 13:56 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 06:02 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation sdru.product@gmail.com - 2017-04-05 11:21 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 10:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 12:19 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 09:11 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 08:37 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 11:23 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 09:52 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 12:04 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 10:15 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 12:26 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-05 03:45 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 05:52 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 08:53 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 08:35 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 11:44 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 09:56 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 12:16 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 02:17 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 09:06 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 08:32 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 12:50 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-14 19:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-05 21:37 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 15:46 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 15:37 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 15:48 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 21:25 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkin_odd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 01:20 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 15:57 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 21:45 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 17:01 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkin_odd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 11:32 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 06:59 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 10:23 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 15:11 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 17:30 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 19:08 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 13:45 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 15:13 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 16:33 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkin_odd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 01:20 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation sdru.product@gmail.com - 2017-03-31 18:56 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 19:21 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 08:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 15:00 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 15:20 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 17:52 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-01 04:00 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 19:22 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 13:47 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 19:14 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 13:48 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 10:26 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:58 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 19:34 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 19:30 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 11:53 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 10:49 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 13:47 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 13:29 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 15:48 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 15:22 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 09:17 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 08:23 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 10:34 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 09:38 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 11:55 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 10:11 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 12:59 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 12:57 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 16:46 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 15:18 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 11:58 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 10:19 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 12:49 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-10 11:56 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 08:14 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 07:26 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 13:34 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:26 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 15:27 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 17:37 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:53 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 17:29 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 15:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 17:42 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:40 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 08:24 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 10:58 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 09:43 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-05 11:49 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 15:30 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 17:39 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-04-01 03:52 +0200
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 19:18 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-27 22:26 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Michiko Husband <nuknuuu@wmnkiin.hi> - 2017-03-27 22:01 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Michiko Husband <nuknuuu@wmnkiin.hi> - 2017-03-27 22:13 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Michiko Husband <nuknuuu@wmnkiin.hi> - 2017-03-27 22:17 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-28 21:10 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 22:05 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-28 21:09 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 14:52 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 21:10 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 07:13 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 08:50 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 11:29 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 12:09 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 15:35 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 15:40 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 18:11 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-27 04:39 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-27 05:43 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-27 08:10 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 10:37 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-27 14:27 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 22:06 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Ottsuki Yo <ukuuu@kuuko.yc> - 2017-03-28 18:50 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 07:19 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2017-03-27 21:52 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 21:07 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 07:21 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 09:04 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 11:23 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 12:01 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 17:17 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 16:47 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 09:08 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 08:36 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-29 15:09 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 09:55 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 04:52 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 13:37 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 11:54 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 10:24 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 21:19 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 10:28 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 10:49 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 13:24 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 12:07 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 14:26 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 12:40 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 15:08 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 13:40 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 16:05 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 16:27 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 07:29 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-23 21:27 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 16:29 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 10:55 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 13:27 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 18:39 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 07:02 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 12:06 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 14:26 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 17:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 19:39 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 20:49 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 09:29 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 10:52 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 13:31 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 16:44 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 19:00 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-16 18:46 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-17 07:08 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 15:29 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 10:58 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 09:24 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 12:38 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation Python <python@python.invalid> - 2017-03-13 20:05 +0100
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 23:48 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 08:07 -0500
Re: mutual relative time dilation RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-21 13:05 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-21 13:27 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-21 21:15 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-03-21 14:43 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-23 21:28 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-23 15:22 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation "Kevin Aylward" <kevinRemovAT@kevinaylward.co.uk> - 2017-03-24 17:04 +0000
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-12 13:58 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-13 10:48 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-13 11:18 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation alsor@interia.pl - 2017-03-14 13:58 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-14 16:03 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 16:29 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 09:46 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 09:50 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-17 12:55 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 11:50 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 13:20 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-18 14:12 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-19 12:59 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-20 10:31 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 12:40 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-21 09:59 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-21 15:25 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation xxein1x1@gmail.com - 2017-03-21 15:32 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-21 16:08 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation xxein1x1@gmail.com - 2017-03-21 16:37 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-22 09:39 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-22 09:44 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-22 10:05 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-22 14:31 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-22 16:19 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-24 18:09 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 18:18 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-24 18:10 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation dickorrich@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 11:39 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation dickorrich@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 11:47 -0700
Re: mutual relative time dilation Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-03-29 15:26 +1100
Re: mutual relative time dilation numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-03-29 16:22 -0700
Page 25 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 23 24 [25] 26 27 … 50 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 10:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oc8cqr$195p$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #415396 |
On 4/7/2017 10:50 AM, Robert Winn wrote: > On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 7:26:50 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 4/7/2017 9:20 AM, Robert Winn wrote: >>> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 6:39:53 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> >>>> I'm going to guess you don't know very many independent voters. >>>> >>>> I didn't mention any political parties here, Robert, you did. The only >>>> time I mentioned any political party at all was when I pointed out that >>>> Republican-appointed conservative judges were the ones that made the Roe >>>> v. Wade decision, when you seemed sure that it was the result of the >>>> Democratic party. >>>> >>>> What I did mention was the sovereign citizen movement and the Posse >>>> Comitatus, neither of which is a political party. I asked you whether >>>> you were a member or an advocate of the sovereign citizen movement, >>>> which you danced around in a wishy-washy manner as though afraid to >>>> answer directly before stating that you identified as a sovereign >>>> citizen. I think that's very interesting. >>>> >>> I have no idea what some political party faction that calls itself sovereign >>> citizens is advocating. >> >> They're not a political party, Robert. Before you assume what they are, >> you should perhaps find out what they are and what they say. I'm frankly >> a little surprised you know so little about them, because the Bundy >> family has been quite vocal about advocating the sovereign citizen >> movement. You may find, for example, that ideologically you have more in >> common with those in the sovereign citizen movement than you have with >> most independent voters. >> >>> As I said, I am an independent voter. I get to have >>> my own beliefs. Someone saying they are a sovereign citizen would have nothing >>> wrong with it if that was all there was to it. However, it would appear that >>> these are a political party faction advocating some kind of party agenda, so, >>> no, I am not part of any such movement. I do not belong to a political party. >>> > >So why are you advocating that I find out what sovereign citizens believe? I just thought for sure you would know about them, given how much the Bundy's talk about them, and how much what they say sounds like what you say. > I thought you were saying that you thought these people are evil. I don't think I said any such thing or anything close to it. Where did I say I thought those people were evil? Are you delusional again? Or just lying? > I already told you what I am going to do. I am going to be an independent voter. > I do not need some right wing political party faction to decide what I believe. But the sovereign citizen movement is not a political party. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 10:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oc8cuh$195p$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #415396 |
On 4/7/2017 10:50 AM, Robert Winn wrote: > I am going to be an independent voter. I do not need some right wing political party faction to decide what I believe. Maybe what you're trying to tell me is that you do not want to be associated with any group whatsoever. You want to be singular, alone, and isolated, similar in thought to no other person or group of people. If someone asks you about any group of people, that to you means a political party. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 09:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6b46db4e-44bb-4c98-9d8f-3a7804aa9bd9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #415399 |
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 8:58:20 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/7/2017 10:50 AM, Robert Winn wrote: > > I am going to be an independent voter. I do not need some right wing political party faction to decide what I believe. > > Maybe what you're trying to tell me is that you do not want to be > associated with any group whatsoever. You want to be singular, alone, > and isolated, similar in thought to no other person or group of people. > If someone asks you about any group of people, that to you means a > political party. > > -- No, that is not what I am trying to tell you. What you are trying to tell me is, If you are not part of some faction or party, you have to join one. No, thank you. I would rather be an independent voter. Thank you very much for your concern.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 11:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oc8eud$1cuu$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #415404 |
On 4/7/2017 11:25 AM, Robert Winn wrote: > On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 8:58:20 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 4/7/2017 10:50 AM, Robert Winn wrote: >>> I am going to be an independent voter. I do not need some right wing political party >>> faction to decide what I believe. >> >> Maybe what you're trying to tell me is that you do not want to be >> associated with any group whatsoever. You want to be singular, alone, >> and isolated, similar in thought to no other person or group of people. >> If someone asks you about any group of people, that to you means a >> political party. >> >> -- > No, that is not what I am trying to tell you. What you are trying to tell me is, If you are > not part of some faction or party, you have to join one. No, thank you. I would rather be > an independent voter. Thank you very much for your concern. > I think you told me at one point that I am an Eastern establishment, city boy, Democratic-party member, even though I have never lived in the east, live further out in the country than you do, and have always been an independent voter. I'm not quite sure why you told me that, but you said that it didn't matter whether I voted independent, and that I'd still be a Democratic party member as far as you are concerned. I didn't say that have to join a group at all. In fact, I surmised just the opposite, that you wanted to be unassociated with any group at all. And then you said the same thing, but complained about me saying it. Just stating facts, Robert. It's remarkable how twisted up you get in simple facts. It's like you find facts repellent. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 09:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <72c1c45a-6364-4db4-93cd-00040548921e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #415405 |
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:32:17 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/7/2017 11:25 AM, Robert Winn wrote: > > On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 8:58:20 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 4/7/2017 10:50 AM, Robert Winn wrote: > >>> I am going to be an independent voter. I do not need some right wing political party > >>> faction to decide what I believe. > >> > >> Maybe what you're trying to tell me is that you do not want to be > >> associated with any group whatsoever. You want to be singular, alone, > >> and isolated, similar in thought to no other person or group of people. > >> If someone asks you about any group of people, that to you means a > >> political party. > >> > >> -- > > No, that is not what I am trying to tell you. What you are trying to tell me is, If you are > > not part of some faction or party, you have to join one. No, thank you. I would rather be > > an independent voter. Thank you very much for your concern. > > > > I think you told me at one point that I am an Eastern establishment, > city boy, Democratic-party member, even though I have never lived in the > east, live further out in the country than you do, and have always been > an independent voter. I'm not quite sure why you told me that, but you > said that it didn't matter whether I voted independent, and that I'd > still be a Democratic party member as far as you are concerned. > > I didn't say that have to join a group at all. In fact, I surmised just > the opposite, that you wanted to be unassociated with any group at all. > And then you said the same thing, but complained about me saying it. > > Just stating facts, Robert. It's remarkable how twisted up you get in > simple facts. It's like you find facts repellent. > > Everything you say to me is Democratic Party propaganda. So now your feelings are hurt because I do not believe what you say. Say something that is not Democratic Party propaganda, and I will consider it. Otherwise, I am not much interested in what you say.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 11:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oc8fvg$1eo7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #415409 |
On 4/7/2017 11:42 AM, Robert Winn wrote: > On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:32:17 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 4/7/2017 11:25 AM, Robert Winn wrote: >>> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 8:58:20 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 4/7/2017 10:50 AM, Robert Winn wrote: >>>>> I am going to be an independent voter. I do not need some right wing political party >>>>> faction to decide what I believe. >>>> >>>> Maybe what you're trying to tell me is that you do not want to be >>>> associated with any group whatsoever. You want to be singular, alone, >>>> and isolated, similar in thought to no other person or group of people. >>>> If someone asks you about any group of people, that to you means a >>>> political party. >>>> >>>> -- >>> No, that is not what I am trying to tell you. What you are trying to tell me is, If you are >>> not part of some faction or party, you have to join one. No, thank you. I would rather be >>> an independent voter. Thank you very much for your concern. >>> >> >> I think you told me at one point that I am an Eastern establishment, >> city boy, Democratic-party member, even though I have never lived in the >> east, live further out in the country than you do, and have always been >> an independent voter. I'm not quite sure why you told me that, but you >> said that it didn't matter whether I voted independent, and that I'd >> still be a Democratic party member as far as you are concerned. >> >> I didn't say that have to join a group at all. In fact, I surmised just >> the opposite, that you wanted to be unassociated with any group at all. >> And then you said the same thing, but complained about me saying it. >> >> Just stating facts, Robert. It's remarkable how twisted up you get in >> simple facts. It's like you find facts repellent. >> >> > Everything you say to me is Democratic Party propaganda. Even though I'm not, nor have I ever been, a Democrat. Perhaps you now understand why I asked you about the sovereign citizen movement, given everything you've ever said to me. > So now your feelings are hurt because I do not believe what you say. > Say something that is not Democratic Party propaganda, and I will consider it. > Otherwise, I am not much interested in what you say. And likewise, nobody seems to be much interested in what you have to say. Even Ryan Bundy does not acknowledge your letters. And yet, despite not being interested in what I have to say, you always take the trouble to formulate a response. Except when confronted with facts. Then you get quiet. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 12:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <890134af-79a4-4620-a57a-36e02c52c3bd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #415410 |
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:49:56 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/7/2017 11:42 AM, Robert Winn wrote: > > On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:32:17 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 4/7/2017 11:25 AM, Robert Winn wrote: > >>> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 8:58:20 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> On 4/7/2017 10:50 AM, Robert Winn wrote: > >>>>> I am going to be an independent voter. I do not need some right wing political party > >>>>> faction to decide what I believe. > >>>> > >>>> Maybe what you're trying to tell me is that you do not want to be > >>>> associated with any group whatsoever. You want to be singular, alone, > >>>> and isolated, similar in thought to no other person or group of people. > >>>> If someone asks you about any group of people, that to you means a > >>>> political party. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>> No, that is not what I am trying to tell you. What you are trying to tell me is, If you are > >>> not part of some faction or party, you have to join one. No, thank you. I would rather be > >>> an independent voter. Thank you very much for your concern. > >>> > >> > >> I think you told me at one point that I am an Eastern establishment, > >> city boy, Democratic-party member, even though I have never lived in the > >> east, live further out in the country than you do, and have always been > >> an independent voter. I'm not quite sure why you told me that, but you > >> said that it didn't matter whether I voted independent, and that I'd > >> still be a Democratic party member as far as you are concerned. > >> > >> I didn't say that have to join a group at all. In fact, I surmised just > >> the opposite, that you wanted to be unassociated with any group at all. > >> And then you said the same thing, but complained about me saying it. > >> > >> Just stating facts, Robert. It's remarkable how twisted up you get in > >> simple facts. It's like you find facts repellent. > >> > >> > > Everything you say to me is Democratic Party propaganda. > > Even though I'm not, nor have I ever been, a Democrat. > > Perhaps you now understand why I asked you about the sovereign citizen > movement, given everything you've ever said to me. > > > So now your feelings are hurt because I do not believe what you say. > > Say something that is not Democratic Party propaganda, and I will consider it. > > Otherwise, I am not much interested in what you say. > > And likewise, nobody seems to be much interested in what you have to > say. Even Ryan Bundy does not acknowledge your letters. > > And yet, despite not being interested in what I have to say, you always > take the trouble to formulate a response. Except when confronted with > facts. Then you get quiet. > > Ryan Bundy wrote to me several times. Now I can't write to him because the detention center where he is being kept will not allow it. I am a very polite person, I do not like it when someone ignores me, so I try not to ignore other people even when they do not have anything to say that interests me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 14:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oc8q32$hg$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #415422 |
On 4/7/2017 2:01 PM, Robert Winn wrote: > On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:49:56 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 4/7/2017 11:42 AM, Robert Winn wrote: >>> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:32:17 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 4/7/2017 11:25 AM, Robert Winn wrote: >>>>> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 8:58:20 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> On 4/7/2017 10:50 AM, Robert Winn wrote: >>>>>>> I am going to be an independent voter. I do not need some right wing political party >>>>>>> faction to decide what I believe. >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe what you're trying to tell me is that you do not want to be >>>>>> associated with any group whatsoever. You want to be singular, alone, >>>>>> and isolated, similar in thought to no other person or group of people. >>>>>> If someone asks you about any group of people, that to you means a >>>>>> political party. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> No, that is not what I am trying to tell you. What you are trying to tell me is, If you are >>>>> not part of some faction or party, you have to join one. No, thank you. I would rather be >>>>> an independent voter. Thank you very much for your concern. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think you told me at one point that I am an Eastern establishment, >>>> city boy, Democratic-party member, even though I have never lived in the >>>> east, live further out in the country than you do, and have always been >>>> an independent voter. I'm not quite sure why you told me that, but you >>>> said that it didn't matter whether I voted independent, and that I'd >>>> still be a Democratic party member as far as you are concerned. >>>> >>>> I didn't say that have to join a group at all. In fact, I surmised just >>>> the opposite, that you wanted to be unassociated with any group at all. >>>> And then you said the same thing, but complained about me saying it. >>>> >>>> Just stating facts, Robert. It's remarkable how twisted up you get in >>>> simple facts. It's like you find facts repellent. >>>> >>>> >>> Everything you say to me is Democratic Party propaganda. >> >> Even though I'm not, nor have I ever been, a Democrat. >> >> Perhaps you now understand why I asked you about the sovereign citizen >> movement, given everything you've ever said to me. >> >>> So now your feelings are hurt because I do not believe what you say. >>> Say something that is not Democratic Party propaganda, and I will consider it. >>> Otherwise, I am not much interested in what you say. >> >> And likewise, nobody seems to be much interested in what you have to >> say. Even Ryan Bundy does not acknowledge your letters. >> >> And yet, despite not being interested in what I have to say, you always >> take the trouble to formulate a response. Except when confronted with >> facts. Then you get quiet. >> >> > Ryan Bundy wrote to me several times. Now I can't write to him because the > detention center where he is being kept will not allow it. Have you sent a letter to him? I showed you how to address a letter to him. You said that he's not getting any letters from you. If you haven't written him in the detention center, how do you know he would not get them? If you have written him, how do you know he's not getting them? The absence of a reply? > I am a very polite person, I do not like it when someone ignores me, so I try > not to ignore other people even when they do not have anything to say that interests me. I think you have invited many people to ignore you, so I'm very surprised when you say you do not like being ignored. Also, what you like and do not like does not constitute a standard of courtesy, Robert. In other words, if you do not like something, that does not make it necessarily impolite. You don't like being likened to someone in the sovereign citizen movement, even though everything you say sure sounds like someone from that movement, including your affiliation with the Bundy family. But that is not an impolite characterization, is it? I'll be frank with you, Robert. I keep talking with you because you say amazingly silly things, and they are entertaining to me. And talking with you about these other silly comments you make keeps you distracted from trying to say something about physics. That's because you have even less to say of value about physics, compared to these other things that you seem to be passionate about. Now, if you do not like how I've told you I am treating you, and you therefore consider it impolite, I'll only comment that in my book, being honest is important to being polite. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 14:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1e2f73af-941e-4d1d-85fd-c1217abe6663@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #415425 |
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 12:42:30 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/7/2017 2:01 PM, Robert Winn wrote: > > On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:49:56 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 4/7/2017 11:42 AM, Robert Winn wrote: > >>> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:32:17 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> On 4/7/2017 11:25 AM, Robert Winn wrote: > >>>>> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 8:58:20 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> On 4/7/2017 10:50 AM, Robert Winn wrote: > >>>>>>> I am going to be an independent voter. I do not need some right wing political party > >>>>>>> faction to decide what I believe. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Maybe what you're trying to tell me is that you do not want to be > >>>>>> associated with any group whatsoever. You want to be singular, alone, > >>>>>> and isolated, similar in thought to no other person or group of people. > >>>>>> If someone asks you about any group of people, that to you means a > >>>>>> political party. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>> No, that is not what I am trying to tell you. What you are trying to tell me is, If you are > >>>>> not part of some faction or party, you have to join one. No, thank you. I would rather be > >>>>> an independent voter. Thank you very much for your concern. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I think you told me at one point that I am an Eastern establishment, > >>>> city boy, Democratic-party member, even though I have never lived in the > >>>> east, live further out in the country than you do, and have always been > >>>> an independent voter. I'm not quite sure why you told me that, but you > >>>> said that it didn't matter whether I voted independent, and that I'd > >>>> still be a Democratic party member as far as you are concerned. > >>>> > >>>> I didn't say that have to join a group at all. In fact, I surmised just > >>>> the opposite, that you wanted to be unassociated with any group at all. > >>>> And then you said the same thing, but complained about me saying it. > >>>> > >>>> Just stating facts, Robert. It's remarkable how twisted up you get in > >>>> simple facts. It's like you find facts repellent. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Everything you say to me is Democratic Party propaganda. > >> > >> Even though I'm not, nor have I ever been, a Democrat. > >> > >> Perhaps you now understand why I asked you about the sovereign citizen > >> movement, given everything you've ever said to me. > >> > >>> So now your feelings are hurt because I do not believe what you say. > >>> Say something that is not Democratic Party propaganda, and I will consider it. > >>> Otherwise, I am not much interested in what you say. > >> > >> And likewise, nobody seems to be much interested in what you have to > >> say. Even Ryan Bundy does not acknowledge your letters. > >> > >> And yet, despite not being interested in what I have to say, you always > >> take the trouble to formulate a response. Except when confronted with > >> facts. Then you get quiet. > >> > >> > > Ryan Bundy wrote to me several times. Now I can't write to him because the > > detention center where he is being kept will not allow it. > > Have you sent a letter to him? I showed you how to address a letter to > him. You said that he's not getting any letters from you. If you haven't > written him in the detention center, how do you know he would not get > them? If you have written him, how do you know he's not getting them? > The absence of a reply? > > > I am a very polite person, I do not like it when someone ignores me, so I try > > not to ignore other people even when they do not have anything to say that interests me. > > I think you have invited many people to ignore you, so I'm very > surprised when you say you do not like being ignored. Also, what you > like and do not like does not constitute a standard of courtesy, Robert. > In other words, if you do not like something, that does not make it > necessarily impolite. You don't like being likened to someone in the > sovereign citizen movement, even though everything you say sure sounds > like someone from that movement, including your affiliation with the > Bundy family. But that is not an impolite characterization, is it? > > I'll be frank with you, Robert. I keep talking with you because you say > amazingly silly things, and they are entertaining to me. And talking > with you about these other silly comments you make keeps you distracted > from trying to say something about physics. That's because you have even > less to say of value about physics, compared to these other things that > you seem to be passionate about. Now, if you do not like how I've told > you I am treating you, and you therefore consider it impolite, I'll only > comment that in my book, being honest is important to being polite. > So what is the name of your book? At least I have a book. I once did some welding for Ammon Bundy. So now you say I am a sovereign citizen associated with the Bundy family. Well, that seems all right to me. If I am not allowed to work in a sawmill or have any cows, maybe there is a cell reserved for me in a federal detention center. You federal land people would know more about that than I would.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 16:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oc916s$ucn$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #415436 |
On 4/7/2017 4:14 PM, Robert Winn wrote: > On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 12:42:30 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 4/7/2017 2:01 PM, Robert Winn wrote: >>> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:49:56 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 4/7/2017 11:42 AM, Robert Winn wrote: >>>>> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 9:32:17 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> On 4/7/2017 11:25 AM, Robert Winn wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 8:58:20 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> On 4/7/2017 10:50 AM, Robert Winn wrote: >>>>>>>>> I am going to be an independent voter. I do not need some right wing political party >>>>>>>>> faction to decide what I believe. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe what you're trying to tell me is that you do not want to be >>>>>>>> associated with any group whatsoever. You want to be singular, alone, >>>>>>>> and isolated, similar in thought to no other person or group of people. >>>>>>>> If someone asks you about any group of people, that to you means a >>>>>>>> political party. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> No, that is not what I am trying to tell you. What you are trying to tell me is, If you are >>>>>>> not part of some faction or party, you have to join one. No, thank you. I would rather be >>>>>>> an independent voter. Thank you very much for your concern. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think you told me at one point that I am an Eastern establishment, >>>>>> city boy, Democratic-party member, even though I have never lived in the >>>>>> east, live further out in the country than you do, and have always been >>>>>> an independent voter. I'm not quite sure why you told me that, but you >>>>>> said that it didn't matter whether I voted independent, and that I'd >>>>>> still be a Democratic party member as far as you are concerned. >>>>>> >>>>>> I didn't say that have to join a group at all. In fact, I surmised just >>>>>> the opposite, that you wanted to be unassociated with any group at all. >>>>>> And then you said the same thing, but complained about me saying it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just stating facts, Robert. It's remarkable how twisted up you get in >>>>>> simple facts. It's like you find facts repellent. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Everything you say to me is Democratic Party propaganda. >>>> >>>> Even though I'm not, nor have I ever been, a Democrat. >>>> >>>> Perhaps you now understand why I asked you about the sovereign citizen >>>> movement, given everything you've ever said to me. >>>> >>>>> So now your feelings are hurt because I do not believe what you say. >>>>> Say something that is not Democratic Party propaganda, and I will consider it. >>>>> Otherwise, I am not much interested in what you say. >>>> >>>> And likewise, nobody seems to be much interested in what you have to >>>> say. Even Ryan Bundy does not acknowledge your letters. >>>> >>>> And yet, despite not being interested in what I have to say, you always >>>> take the trouble to formulate a response. Except when confronted with >>>> facts. Then you get quiet. >>>> >>>> >>> Ryan Bundy wrote to me several times. Now I can't write to him because the >>> detention center where he is being kept will not allow it. >> >> Have you sent a letter to him? I showed you how to address a letter to >> him. You said that he's not getting any letters from you. If you haven't >> written him in the detention center, how do you know he would not get >> them? If you have written him, how do you know he's not getting them? >> The absence of a reply? Isn't it funny how you thought just calling the center was proof that they would not deliver your mail to Ryan Bundy? >> >>> I am a very polite person, I do not like it when someone ignores me, so I try >>> not to ignore other people even when they do not have anything to say that interests me. >> >> I think you have invited many people to ignore you, so I'm very >> surprised when you say you do not like being ignored. Also, what you >> like and do not like does not constitute a standard of courtesy, Robert. >> In other words, if you do not like something, that does not make it >> necessarily impolite. You don't like being likened to someone in the >> sovereign citizen movement, even though everything you say sure sounds >> like someone from that movement, including your affiliation with the >> Bundy family. But that is not an impolite characterization, is it? >> >> I'll be frank with you, Robert. I keep talking with you because you say >> amazingly silly things, and they are entertaining to me. And talking >> with you about these other silly comments you make keeps you distracted >> from trying to say something about physics. That's because you have even >> less to say of value about physics, compared to these other things that >> you seem to be passionate about. Now, if you do not like how I've told >> you I am treating you, and you therefore consider it impolite, I'll only >> comment that in my book, being honest is important to being polite. >> > So what is the name of your book? At least I have a book. I don't have a book. To be honest, having a book these days is not much of an accomplishment. Anyone with a few hundred dollars and a lot of time on their hands can self publish a book with a tool like CreateSpace (oh my, look at that, it's what you used). I think you might even get it in the Library of Congress, alongside a compilation of logarithm tables. By the way, the reviews of this book on Amazon were helpful to me. I also found it fun that the used book seller Red Rhino is offering your paperback for the handsome price of $533.68, which at least should keep it out of the hands of children. I'm aware that you've self-published a number of books, probably costing you a few thousand dollars in total from your Social Security safety net. Being loud is more important than being fed, eh, Robert? > I once did > some welding for Ammon Bundy. So now you say I am a sovereign citizen associated > with the Bundy family. Well, that seems all right to me. I'm glad you think so, Robert. I find it interesting that the sovereign citizen movement does not recognize the authority of federal officials. Meanwhile the 12th article of faith of the LDS church reads: "We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law." > If I am not allowed to work in a sawmill or have any cows, maybe there is a cell > reserved for me in a federal detention center. You federal land people would > know more about that than I would. > At least in a federal detention center, you would not have to get in a pickup truck without a valid license to go get a meal. And the door would be quite a bit more secure than on a single-wide. The only real downside for you would be the lack of internet and being generally ignored. I don't think it would take much for you to land in that cell if you wanted to -- just become active in Oath Keepers. That way, at least, you'll learn how to make dandelion root coffee when the armed revolution happens. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 19:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5e5ce3e3-b611-4f79-bbc3-8ed15d3299fe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #415448 |
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 2:44:00 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/7/2017 4:14 PM, Robert Winn wrote: > >> written him in the detention center, how do you know he would not get > >> them? If you have written him, how do you know he's not getting them? > >> The absence of a reply? > > Isn't it funny how you thought just calling the center was proof that > they would not deliver your mail to Ryan Bundy? > I am not the only person who is not being allowed to contact Ryan Bundy. > >>> I am a very polite person, I do not like it when someone ignores me, so I try > >>> not to ignore other people even when they do not have anything to say that interests me. > >> > >> I think you have invited many people to ignore you, so I'm very > >> surprised when you say you do not like being ignored. Also, what you > >> like and do not like does not constitute a standard of courtesy, Robert. > >> In other words, if you do not like something, that does not make it > >> necessarily impolite. You don't like being likened to someone in the > >> sovereign citizen movement, even though everything you say sure sounds > >> like someone from that movement, including your affiliation with the > >> Bundy family. But that is not an impolite characterization, is it? > >> > >> I'll be frank with you, Robert. I keep talking with you because you say > >> amazingly silly things, and they are entertaining to me. And talking > >> with you about these other silly comments you make keeps you distracted > >> from trying to say something about physics. That's because you have even > >> less to say of value about physics, compared to these other things that > >> you seem to be passionate about. Now, if you do not like how I've told > >> you I am treating you, and you therefore consider it impolite, I'll only > >> comment that in my book, being honest is important to being polite. > >> > > So what is the name of your book? At least I have a book. > > I don't have a book. To be honest, having a book these days is not much > of an accomplishment. Anyone with a few hundred dollars and a lot of > time on their hands can self publish a book with a tool like CreateSpace > (oh my, look at that, it's what you used). I think you might even get it > in the Library of Congress, alongside a compilation of logarithm tables. > > By the way, the reviews of this book on Amazon were helpful to me. Well, I am sure political party operatives are helpful to you in other ways. I think you should just be honest with yourself and call yourself a Democrat. I > also found it fun that the used book seller Red Rhino is offering your > paperback for the handsome price of $533.68, which at least should keep > it out of the hands of children. > > I'm aware that you've self-published a number of books, probably costing > you a few thousand dollars in total from your Social Security safety > net. Being loud is more important than being fed, eh, Robert? My book is gaining in popularity all the time. > > I once did > > some welding for Ammon Bundy. So now you say I am a sovereign citizen associated > > with the Bundy family. Well, that seems all right to me. > > I'm glad you think so, Robert. I find it interesting that the sovereign > citizen movement does not recognize the authority of federal officials. > Meanwhile the 12th article of faith of the LDS church reads: "We believe > in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in > obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law." > > > If I am not allowed to work in a sawmill or have any cows, maybe there is a cell > > reserved for me in a federal detention center. You federal land people would > > know more about that than I would. > > > > At least in a federal detention center, you would not have to get in a > pickup truck without a valid license to go get a meal. And the door > would be quite a bit more secure than on a single-wide. The only real > downside for you would be the lack of internet and being generally > ignored. I don't think it would take much for you to land in that cell > if you wanted to -- just become active in Oath Keepers. That way, at > least, you'll learn how to make dandelion root coffee when the armed > revolution happens. > We don't drink coffee in the church I belong to. I don't need a driver's license to drive a pickup truck on a farm. But you might want to report it to the FBI anyway. I am sure they would know what it means in terms of an FBI profile.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 15:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oc8ref$3mk$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #415422 |
On 4/7/2017 2:01 PM, Robert Winn wrote: > I am a very polite person, I do not like it when someone ignores me, so I try not > to ignore other people even when they do not have anything to say that interests me. You say you are a very polite person. And yet when I assure you that I have always been an independent voter like you, you choose not to believe me, and instead say to my face that I am in your estimation a Democratic party member. This is calling me a liar without factual basis. You have a very peculiar view of being polite. You also say you do not judge. But you have been quite straightforward saying that certain wide swaths of humanity are pure unadulterated evil. If that isn't judgment, I don't know what is, Robert. You say you are perfectly sane. But then you talk in all earnestness about equation police knocking down your door, and about physicists threatening to use atomic bombs on anyone who uses Galilean transformation equations. This frankly does not sound sane to me. I think there are nice adjectives you would like to apply to yourself, but that's only because you haven't bothered to look at yourself carefully in the mirror in quite a while. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 15:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oc8so1$60a$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #415427 |
On 4/7/2017 3:05 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/7/2017 2:01 PM, Robert Winn wrote: >> I am a very polite person, I do not like it when someone ignores me, >> so I try not >> to ignore other people even when they do not have anything to say that >> interests me. > > You say you are a very polite person. And yet when I assure you that I > have always been an independent voter like you, you choose not to > believe me, and instead say to my face that I am in your estimation a > Democratic party member. This is calling me a liar without factual > basis. You have a very peculiar view of being polite. > > You also say you do not judge. But you have been quite straightforward > saying that certain wide swaths of humanity are pure unadulterated evil. > If that isn't judgment, I don't know what is, Robert. > > You say you are perfectly sane. But then you talk in all earnestness > about equation police knocking down your door, and about physicists > threatening to use atomic bombs on anyone who uses Galilean > transformation equations. This frankly does not sound sane to me. > > I think there are nice adjectives you would like to apply to yourself, > but that's only because you haven't bothered to look at yourself > carefully in the mirror in quite a while. > Finally, I'll just add that you list your faith affiliation as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I believe that Ammon and Ryan Bundy both claimed that God had given them a direct sign to do what got them in trouble. They, like you, are devout Mormons. Nevertheless, the LDS Church officially denounced both their proclamation and their actions, citing the twelfth article of faith, as well as the general prohibition of the encouragement, endorsement or approval for using weapons and violence in any political activity. Now, perhaps you have recently separated yourself from the Mormon church, I don't know. But it seems clear to me there is some internal conflict here that you have not resolved. Along with a fair number of other internal conflicts. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 14:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f0cb2ff6-a0c1-424a-8752-43338e5a369f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #415432 |
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 1:27:49 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/7/2017 3:05 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > On 4/7/2017 2:01 PM, Robert Winn wrote: > >> I am a very polite person, I do not like it when someone ignores me, > >> so I try not > >> to ignore other people even when they do not have anything to say that > >> interests me. > > > > You say you are a very polite person. And yet when I assure you that I > > have always been an independent voter like you, you choose not to > > believe me, and instead say to my face that I am in your estimation a > > Democratic party member. This is calling me a liar without factual > > basis. You have a very peculiar view of being polite. > > > > You also say you do not judge. But you have been quite straightforward > > saying that certain wide swaths of humanity are pure unadulterated evil. > > If that isn't judgment, I don't know what is, Robert. > > > > You say you are perfectly sane. But then you talk in all earnestness > > about equation police knocking down your door, and about physicists > > threatening to use atomic bombs on anyone who uses Galilean > > transformation equations. This frankly does not sound sane to me. > > > > I think there are nice adjectives you would like to apply to yourself, > > but that's only because you haven't bothered to look at yourself > > carefully in the mirror in quite a while. > > > > Finally, I'll just add that you list your faith affiliation as the > Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I believe that Ammon and > Ryan Bundy both claimed that God had given them a direct sign to do what > got them in trouble. They, like you, are devout Mormons. Nevertheless, > the LDS Church officially denounced both their proclamation and their > actions, citing the twelfth article of faith, as well as the general > prohibition of the encouragement, endorsement or approval for using > weapons and violence in any political activity. Now, perhaps you have > recently separated yourself from the Mormon church, I don't know. But it > seems clear to me there is some internal conflict here that you have not > resolved. Along with a fair number of other internal conflicts. > No, I don't have any internal conflicts. I stayed out of the abortion movement. I never got into the pizzagate pedophile movement. To a Democrat, my life must seem fairly uneventful.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 17:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oc92li$1ddu$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #415441 |
On 4/7/2017 4:21 PM, Robert Winn wrote: > On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 1:27:49 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> Finally, I'll just add that you list your faith affiliation as the >> Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I believe that Ammon and >> Ryan Bundy both claimed that God had given them a direct sign to do what >> got them in trouble. They, like you, are devout Mormons. Nevertheless, >> the LDS Church officially denounced both their proclamation and their >> actions, citing the twelfth article of faith, as well as the general >> prohibition of the encouragement, endorsement or approval for using >> weapons and violence in any political activity. Now, perhaps you have >> recently separated yourself from the Mormon church, I don't know. But it >> seems clear to me there is some internal conflict here that you have not >> resolved. Along with a fair number of other internal conflicts. >> > No, I don't have any internal conflicts. Perhaps you have not looked in the mirror quite long enough. You seem to be unaware of the ideological conflicts you espouse both sides of at the same time. Easy to look instead at the sins you don't do, but really hard to look at the ones you do. By the way, you've often cited Ammon Bundy's success with a truck servicing company, even through the recession. Good for him. Too bad he short-sold his house and was way behind on property taxes when he fled Arizona. And that business was funded with a half-million dollar load from the federal government's Small Business Administration, did you know that? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 17:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oc9595$1h6v$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #415452 |
On 4/7/2017 5:08 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/7/2017 4:21 PM, Robert Winn wrote: >> On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 1:27:49 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> Finally, I'll just add that you list your faith affiliation as the >>> Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I believe that Ammon and >>> Ryan Bundy both claimed that God had given them a direct sign to do what >>> got them in trouble. They, like you, are devout Mormons. Nevertheless, >>> the LDS Church officially denounced both their proclamation and their >>> actions, citing the twelfth article of faith, as well as the general >>> prohibition of the encouragement, endorsement or approval for using >>> weapons and violence in any political activity. Now, perhaps you have >>> recently separated yourself from the Mormon church, I don't know. But it >>> seems clear to me there is some internal conflict here that you have not >>> resolved. Along with a fair number of other internal conflicts. >>> >> No, I don't have any internal conflicts. > > Perhaps you have not looked in the mirror quite long enough. You seem to > be unaware of the ideological conflicts you espouse both sides of at the > same time. Easy to look instead at the sins you don't do, but really > hard to look at the ones you do. > > By the way, you've often cited Ammon Bundy's success with a truck > servicing company, even through the recession. Good for him. Too bad he > short-sold his house and was way behind on property taxes when he fled > Arizona. And that business was funded with a half-million dollar load > from the federal government's Small Business Administration, did you > know that? Sorry, there is a typo where I said "load" when I meant "loan". I've also noticed that the LDS Church had a policy until 1978 that prevented any black man from being ordained in the lay priesthood. In fact, Brigham Young would not have liked the Voting Rights Act of 1964, would he have? Since you have mentioned that Democratic Party propaganda espouses slavery, I wonder how you have resolved that with the anti-black-suffrage policies of the LDS church. But back to Ammon Bundy and his efforts to create a "citizen's grand jury" when he was doing that little rebellion thing. The concept of a "citizen's grand jury" comes directly from Posse Comitatus, which in turn borrowed its philosophy from William Potter Gale. You've mentioned that you'd like to see the "township" concept revived, which is another Posse Comitatus idea. You also said that you'd like the control of the trees in Lincoln County returned to local county administration, and this is a central tenet of Posse Comitatus, as well as the sovereign citizen movement you said you would enjoy being affiliated with. Both the Posse Comitatus and the American Nazi Party that sprang from William Potter Gale are rather famous for their white supremacist views. You say you don't like slavery, but many of the people you admire and share other ideas with seem to be pretty committed to perpetuating it. You know, Robert, if you're really tired of barely surviving with practically nothing to do in Maricopa, and you wouldn't mind a simpler life in a federal prison, I think it would be pretty straightforward to stand up for your convictions and declare openly your affiliation with Posse Comitatus and collaboration with Ammon and Ryan Bundy. That way, it can be something someone could print out and hand to the federal authorities on the day your life gets much simpler. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 18:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oc968s$1j2e$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #415455 |
On 4/7/2017 5:53 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > I've also noticed that the LDS Church had a policy until 1978 that > prevented any black man from being ordained in the lay priesthood. In > fact, Brigham Young would not have liked the Voting Rights Act of 1964, > would he have? Since you have mentioned that Democratic Party propaganda > espouses slavery, I wonder how you have resolved that with the > anti-black-suffrage policies of the LDS church. > > But back to Ammon Bundy and his efforts to create a "citizen's grand > jury" when he was doing that little rebellion thing. The concept of a > "citizen's grand jury" comes directly from Posse Comitatus, which in > turn borrowed its philosophy from William Potter Gale. You've mentioned > that you'd like to see the "township" concept revived, which is another > Posse Comitatus idea. You also said that you'd like the control of the > trees in Lincoln County returned to local county administration, and > this is a central tenet of Posse Comitatus, as well as the sovereign > citizen movement you said you would enjoy being affiliated with. Both > the Posse Comitatus and the American Nazi Party that sprang from William > Potter Gale are rather famous for their white supremacist views. You say > you don't like slavery, but many of the people you admire and share > other ideas with seem to be pretty committed to perpetuating it. > > You know, Robert, if you're really tired of barely surviving with > practically nothing to do in Maricopa, and you wouldn't mind a simpler > life in a federal prison, I think it would be pretty straightforward to > stand up for your convictions and declare openly your affiliation with > Posse Comitatus and collaboration with Ammon and Ryan Bundy. That way, > it can be something someone could print out and hand to the federal > authorities on the day your life gets much simpler. Ooooohhhhhh, things suddenly have become clearer. You have said you admire the Bundy family and their activities, that you do not particularly care for the US Constitution and its perpetuation of European ideas, and that you would not mind being part of the sovereign citizen movement, like Posse Comitatus. That whole chain is oriented toward white supremacy and subjugation of black and Semitic peoples. Einstein was a Jewish scientist of note. So it turns out that your essential distaste of relativity and your whole reason for posting about your deliberate choice to never use any product of Einstein's mind, stems from your basic distaste for Jews and for science, and in particular for a Jewish scientist. So it turns out that you are not an interesting crank at all, but a rather pedestrian anti-Semitic crank, one of hundreds of similar loons who carefully mask their real views behind shabbily dressed facades. I remember you told me that if you'd had a chance to talk to Ammon Bundy, you would have told him not to take on the feds like he did because they'd take him down. Ammon and Ryan Bundy did indeed get taken down, but at least they had the courage to be honest and straightforward about their convictions, and not a hide-behind-the-door, gutless fake like you've been for most of your life. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 19:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c6793758-fe18-4883-967c-7b92a90dd801@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #415461 |
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 4:10:25 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/7/2017 5:53 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > I've also noticed that the LDS Church had a policy until 1978 that > > prevented any black man from being ordained in the lay priesthood. In > > fact, Brigham Young would not have liked the Voting Rights Act of 1964, > > would he have? Since you have mentioned that Democratic Party propaganda > > espouses slavery, I wonder how you have resolved that with the > > anti-black-suffrage policies of the LDS church. > > > > But back to Ammon Bundy and his efforts to create a "citizen's grand > > jury" when he was doing that little rebellion thing. The concept of a > > "citizen's grand jury" comes directly from Posse Comitatus, which in > > turn borrowed its philosophy from William Potter Gale. You've mentioned > > that you'd like to see the "township" concept revived, which is another > > Posse Comitatus idea. You also said that you'd like the control of the > > trees in Lincoln County returned to local county administration, and > > this is a central tenet of Posse Comitatus, as well as the sovereign > > citizen movement you said you would enjoy being affiliated with. Both > > the Posse Comitatus and the American Nazi Party that sprang from William > > Potter Gale are rather famous for their white supremacist views. You say > > you don't like slavery, but many of the people you admire and share > > other ideas with seem to be pretty committed to perpetuating it. > > > > You know, Robert, if you're really tired of barely surviving with > > practically nothing to do in Maricopa, and you wouldn't mind a simpler > > life in a federal prison, I think it would be pretty straightforward to > > stand up for your convictions and declare openly your affiliation with > > Posse Comitatus and collaboration with Ammon and Ryan Bundy. That way, > > it can be something someone could print out and hand to the federal > > authorities on the day your life gets much simpler. > > Ooooohhhhhh, things suddenly have become clearer. You have said you > admire the Bundy family and their activities, that you do not > particularly care for the US Constitution and its perpetuation of > European ideas, and that you would not mind being part of the sovereign > citizen movement, like Posse Comitatus. That whole chain is oriented > toward white supremacy and subjugation of black and Semitic peoples. > > Einstein was a Jewish scientist of note. > > So it turns out that your essential distaste of relativity and your > whole reason for posting about your deliberate choice to never use any > product of Einstein's mind, stems from your basic distaste for Jews and > for science, and in particular for a Jewish scientist. > > So it turns out that you are not an interesting crank at all, but a > rather pedestrian anti-Semitic crank, one of hundreds of similar loons > who carefully mask their real views behind shabbily dressed facades. > > I remember you told me that if you'd had a chance to talk to Ammon > Bundy, you would have told him not to take on the feds like he did > because they'd take him down. Ammon and Ryan Bundy did indeed get taken > down, but at least they had the courage to be honest and straightforward > about their convictions, and not a hide-behind-the-door, gutless fake > like you've been for most of your life. I found out about the federal government and what it means long before the Bundy boys did. I told Ryan Bundy that being in jail or federal detention was a picnic compared to being in a federal V.A. hospital. They don't force you to take drugs in jail or federal detention. Odd that you would call me anti-Semitic. I believe that Jews are Israelites, covenant people. So how do you feel about Bibi Netanyahu? Maybe you are the anti-Semite.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-08 11:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ocb1m9$7b4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #415481 |
On 4/7/2017 9:49 PM, Robert Winn wrote: > I found out about the federal government and what it means long before the Bundy boys did. > I told Ryan Bundy that being in jail or federal detention was a picnic compared to being > in a federal V.A. hospital. They don't force you to take drugs in jail or federal detention. > Odd that you would call me anti-Semitic. I believe that Jews are Israelites, covenant people. > So how do you feel about Bibi Netanyahu? Maybe you are the anti-Semite. Robert, I think I understand you pretty well now. I know people like you, because I go visit guys in prisons and in homeless tent camps. Not county jails, by the way -- prisons. You're a pre-Unabomber Theodore Kaczynski, Robert. Like Ted, you have written your manifestos. Like him, you live a simple and solitary lifestyle on the hairy fringe of society, which is a situation you prefer and are quite comfortable with. Like him, you consider yourself not only intelligent but belonging to a rarified moral elite, with higher standards than most other people (you believe) and called to a higher purpose than most. You read about love in the Bible but it's not something you have strong personal experience of. The closest thing you can put a finger on is the feeling of camaraderie among like-minded people, which can become downright emotional when called to common action. You are torn between staying above the fray and being inspired to do something dramatic like you see your like-minded friends do. You will be law-abiding until the day you don't, and then your circumstances will change, but not in so dramatic a fashion that you will not be able to adjust and still keep your sense of righteousness. And you'll slip imperceptibly over the edge into the over-the-edge community where there is a high concentration of people like you. If you end up homeless, then you will not lose much. You'll still pick up odds-and-end work, you'll find company with fellow outcasts, and you'll survive in simple fashion. If you end up in prison, you'll find quickly that the population is segregated into whites, blacks and Hispanics, and you'll gravitate to your kind. You'll either keep to yourself, speak to practically no one, and die anonymously; or you'll find yourself attracted to the Identity Christians where you will find like-minded people with a common moral imperative. One day you'll notice that "white" and "power" both have five letters, and you have five knuckles on each hand. A prison tat is not something people think about having before they go in, or even when they go in, but only after a while. But like many in there, you will find it makes a statement, and then one day you'll wake up and admire full-sleeve tattoos and maybe one on your neck which you'll accentuate by shaving your head. You certainly won't stand out if you do, you'll actually fit in. And you'll find the message of a brand of Christianity that despises the other segments of the population and calls you to a moral elitism and destiny, which you'll embrace. The world has gone to hell in a handbasket, but from inside prison you do not have to live in that swill or endure its sins, you will say. Neither of these outcomes will bother you much, because you're not really woven into society as it is, and you never really have been. So maybe, you'll tell yourself, it's for the best, because here at least you belong, rather than feeling the outcast and the loner. I know all about you, Robert. I recognize you. I've seen you a hundred times, heard you say the same kinds of things, heard you complain about the same kinds of people. You may have had different faces, different histories, different details. But I know you very well. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Winn <rbwinn3@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-08 10:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d1ed6aa6-c160-4ff6-85af-76f299398222@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #415520 |
On Saturday, April 8, 2017 at 9:04:28 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/7/2017 9:49 PM, Robert Winn wrote: > > I found out about the federal government and what it means long before the Bundy boys did. > > I told Ryan Bundy that being in jail or federal detention was a picnic compared to being > > in a federal V.A. hospital. They don't force you to take drugs in jail or federal detention. > > Odd that you would call me anti-Semitic. I believe that Jews are Israelites, covenant people. > > So how do you feel about Bibi Netanyahu? Maybe you are the anti-Semite. > > Robert, I think I understand you pretty well now. I know people like > you, because I go visit guys in prisons and in homeless tent camps. Not > county jails, by the way -- prisons. You're a pre-Unabomber Theodore > Kaczynski, Robert. Like Ted, you have written your manifestos. Like him, > you live a simple and solitary lifestyle on the hairy fringe of society, > which is a situation you prefer and are quite comfortable with. Like > him, you consider yourself not only intelligent but belonging to a > rarified moral elite, with higher standards than most other people (you > believe) and called to a higher purpose than most. You read about love > in the Bible but it's not something you have strong personal experience > of. The closest thing you can put a finger on is the feeling of > camaraderie among like-minded people, which can become downright > emotional when called to common action. You are torn between staying > above the fray and being inspired to do something dramatic like you see > your like-minded friends do. You will be law-abiding until the day you > don't, and then your circumstances will change, but not in so dramatic a > fashion that you will not be able to adjust and still keep your sense of > righteousness. And you'll slip imperceptibly over the edge into the > over-the-edge community where there is a high concentration of people > like you. > > If you end up homeless, then you will not lose much. You'll still pick > up odds-and-end work, you'll find company with fellow outcasts, and > you'll survive in simple fashion. > > If you end up in prison, you'll find quickly that the population is > segregated into whites, blacks and Hispanics, and you'll gravitate to > your kind. You'll either keep to yourself, speak to practically no one, > and die anonymously; or you'll find yourself attracted to the Identity > Christians where you will find like-minded people with a common moral > imperative. One day you'll notice that "white" and "power" both have > five letters, and you have five knuckles on each hand. A prison tat is > not something people think about having before they go in, or even when > they go in, but only after a while. But like many in there, you will > find it makes a statement, and then one day you'll wake up and admire > full-sleeve tattoos and maybe one on your neck which you'll accentuate > by shaving your head. You certainly won't stand out if you do, you'll > actually fit in. And you'll find the message of a brand of Christianity > that despises the other segments of the population and calls you to a > moral elitism and destiny, which you'll embrace. The world has gone to > hell in a handbasket, but from inside prison you do not have to live in > that swill or endure its sins, you will say. > > Neither of these outcomes will bother you much, because you're not > really woven into society as it is, and you never really have been. So > maybe, you'll tell yourself, it's for the best, because here at least > you belong, rather than feeling the outcast and the loner. > > I know all about you, Robert. I recognize you. I've seen you a hundred > times, heard you say the same kinds of things, heard you complain about > the same kinds of people. You may have had different faces, different > histories, different details. But I know you very well. > Your mention of Ted Kaczinski is interesting because I had also used him as an example of what you are like. He was a university professor, you are a person who automatically believes anything said at universities. He conspired against and killed people involved in the lumber industry: you express the same sentiments and glory in watching seven million acres of trees burn every year, expressing your satisfaction that trees ended in this manner cannot be used for houses or anything else useful to humanity. Ted Kaczinski is a Luddite, as are you. Ted Kaczinski liked to kill people, which means he is also like you in that regard, but Ted tended to select adults as his victims and kill them by himself, whereas, you target unborn children and participate as a party member, not actually performing the homicides yourself, but hiring people in the legal and medical professions to justify and perpetrate the killings by use of money obtained through your political party from public revenues. In any event, I think your political associates are too full of fear to ever come after me, unless they could do it as a swat team or other domestic terrorist organization. I am careful to never jaywalk or otherwise give them excuse. In fact other than a few things about me on the internet and police profiles, there is probably nothing that would cause me to come to their attention unless they happen to decide to arrest someone who is driving a car in which I am a passenger. In any event, I do not have any tattoos or guns, so how are they going to find me?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 25 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 23 24 [25] 26 27 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web