Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #402911 > unrolled thread
| Started by | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-12-24 19:02 +1100 |
| Last post | 2016-12-30 08:16 +1100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 390 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-24 19:02 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 01:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 01:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-25 08:39 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 14:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-25 18:29 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-25 01:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 05:23 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? bartekltg@gmail.com - 2016-12-25 12:29 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 08:08 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? bartekltg@gmail.com - 2016-12-25 13:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-12-27 11:08 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? bartekltg@gmail.com - 2016-12-27 05:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-28 11:22 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-25 12:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 08:17 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-24 22:38 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-25 08:11 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-24 06:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-25 08:16 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-25 08:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 05:25 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-25 10:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 08:12 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-12-25 19:21 -0600
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-12-26 03:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-28 11:26 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-26 09:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-28 11:28 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-28 09:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-29 06:37 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-29 11:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 08:03 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-29 14:10 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 11:23 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-30 11:52 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-31 07:31 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Eckard B <eckard.blumschein@arcor.de> - 2017-01-04 03:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-05 08:32 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-24 16:35 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-25 08:17 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-25 05:19 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-25 18:32 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-25 15:38 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-12-24 16:07 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-12-24 20:33 -0600
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-24 18:43 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-12-25 08:25 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 05:37 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 04:59 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-12-27 00:09 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-28 11:46 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-12-27 19:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-28 18:53 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-28 16:54 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-29 06:03 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-29 02:43 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 08:06 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-29 22:25 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 11:26 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-30 01:06 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 14:28 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? bartekltg@gmail.com - 2016-12-25 07:35 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-26 07:53 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 09:47 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 15:08 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-28 11:27 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 15:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 08:01 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 14:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 11:19 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-29 06:32 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-12-28 22:26 +0100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 07:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 08:27 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 13:55 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 10:52 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 03:47 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-31 07:34 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-30 14:20 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-30 14:50 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-02 06:27 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 01:10 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2017-01-02 09:31 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-03 13:03 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 18:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-01-04 03:52 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-01-04 10:45 +0100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-05 08:22 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-01-05 11:19 +0100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-06 08:54 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 14:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-06 15:53 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 03:12 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-01-07 05:44 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 14:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-06 15:16 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 15:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-06 17:25 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 20:38 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 20:50 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 20:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-06 21:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-06 21:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-06 21:20 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-06 21:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-06 22:08 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 02:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 04:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 05:26 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 08:02 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 09:42 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 09:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 16:21 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 16:33 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 17:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 17:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 17:43 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 19:58 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 21:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 21:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 00:36 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 07:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 21:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 01:08 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 07:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 17:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 17:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 18:00 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 18:09 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 01:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 01:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 06:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 06:49 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 08:12 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 08:16 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 16:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 16:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 17:27 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 19:00 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 19:10 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 00:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-01-10 00:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-10 07:48 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 07:58 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-10 08:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-01-09 10:32 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 12:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 13:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 15:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 15:46 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 16:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 16:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 17:09 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 17:19 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 17:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 17:59 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 17:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 17:26 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 17:32 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 18:09 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 18:12 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-08 20:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-08 22:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 00:08 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 06:43 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 19:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 19:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 19:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 19:36 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 19:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 19:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 20:00 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 20:32 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 21:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-09 21:26 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 21:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-01-11 18:26 -0600
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-11 19:31 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-11 19:55 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 01:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 06:32 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2017-01-12 09:20 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 09:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2017-01-12 09:49 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 07:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 08:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 08:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 09:07 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 10:13 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 11:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 12:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 12:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 12:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 13:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 15:11 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 15:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-12 15:25 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-14 01:58 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-14 17:50 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-17 02:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 07:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2017-01-12 15:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-14 09:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-14 18:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-14 18:43 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-14 18:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-14 20:08 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-14 20:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-14 21:02 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-15 10:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-15 18:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-15 22:08 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-16 19:53 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-16 20:20 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-16 20:49 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-16 22:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 07:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 08:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 08:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 08:54 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 09:21 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 09:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 11:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 11:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 12:50 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 13:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 14:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 14:48 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 15:12 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 17:09 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 18:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 18:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-18 17:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-18 17:52 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-18 18:00 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-18 19:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-18 20:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-18 21:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-19 04:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 05:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 07:55 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 11:20 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 11:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 12:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 15:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 16:38 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 17:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 17:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 18:49 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 07:46 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-18 21:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-19 01:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-18 21:32 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-18 21:49 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-18 22:16 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-18 22:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-18 23:00 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 07:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 17:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 18:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 19:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 20:29 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-19 22:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-19 22:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 01:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-20 01:59 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 06:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 06:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 06:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 09:38 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 09:55 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 10:48 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 11:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 11:49 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 12:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 13:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 15:26 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 16:27 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-20 12:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 20:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 20:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-20 22:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-21 13:35 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 15:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-21 16:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 16:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-21 18:13 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 19:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-21 20:48 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 20:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-21 22:07 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 22:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-21 22:18 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 22:21 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-21 22:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 23:07 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 02:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 08:12 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 08:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 08:31 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 08:42 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 09:04 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 09:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 09:29 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 10:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 15:36 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-21 22:22 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-21 23:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 08:36 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 09:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 10:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 11:20 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 11:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 11:50 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 15:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 15:29 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 15:42 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 17:03 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 17:46 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 18:03 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 18:47 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 19:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 19:38 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 20:36 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-22 22:03 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-22 23:03 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-23 05:44 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 07:55 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-23 08:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 08:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-23 12:19 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 14:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-23 16:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 17:35 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-23 18:42 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 20:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-23 22:17 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 22:40 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-24 17:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-24 19:57 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-24 21:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-25 08:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-25 08:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-25 08:51 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-25 09:58 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-25 10:35 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-25 10:30 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-25 10:41 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-25 11:35 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-25 12:03 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-26 01:35 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-01-26 02:05 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-01-26 15:39 +0100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-01-27 20:33 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2017-01-24 22:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-25 08:06 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? crisdunbar@gmail.com - 2017-01-23 13:19 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 13:54 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-23 14:01 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 14:24 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-01-23 16:17 -0600
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 14:23 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-23 14:34 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-23 14:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-01-24 13:25 -0600
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-12 01:02 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-01-12 01:37 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-01-22 14:42 -0600
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-22 15:14 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 06:56 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 21:32 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-09 01:39 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-09 06:45 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2017-01-07 08:00 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 05:17 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? alsor@interia.pl - 2017-01-07 11:48 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-08 10:37 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-07 17:25 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-08 15:42 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-08 05:51 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2017-01-09 04:56 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-08 19:31 +0000
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-09 08:06 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 17:26 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-06 08:17 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-04 09:21 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2017-01-01 13:00 +1100
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-12-29 12:28 -0800
Re: Why Do SR and BaTh Both Give the Right Answer for a Sagnac Ring Gyro? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-12-30 08:16 +1100
Page 2 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 20 Next page →
| From | alsor@interia.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-25 08:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ccc64724-57eb-4b3f-ae84-cd9b88d8f107@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #402937 |
W dniu sobota, 24 grudnia 2016 22:16:13 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > On 25/12/16 01:53, alsor@interia.pl wrote: > > W dniu sobota, 24 grudnia 2016 09:02:32 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > >> When viewed in the inertial frame, both SR and BaTh agree that the two > >> beams of a ring gyro travel different distances. SR says both beams move > >> at c in the non-rotating frame and have different travel times, Bath > >> says the travel times are the same. SR says light is a simple oscillator > >> and since both rays leave together, they must reunite with different > >> phase. BaTh says light does not oscillate during travel but has a fixed > >> wavelength. > >> > >> SR says the travel times are 2piR/(c+v) and 2piR/(c-v) and the > >> difference is = 2piR(2v/(c^2-v^2)) = 4Aw /c^2. > >> Therefore phase difference at receiver is = 4Aw/(c.Lambda) > >> > >> BaTh says both travel times are: t = 2piR/c and the path lengths are > >> (c+v)t and (c-v)t. Therefore the difference in path lengths is 4piRv/c. > >> Since lambda is constant, the phase difference = 4Aw/(c.lambda) as before. > >> > >> So how can two diametrically opposed theories produce the same correct > >> answer? > >> > >> > >> -- > > > > You should first define what is the BaTh in your stupid speech. > > Here is an autographed copy: http://www.scisite.info/wilsonsbath.html Oh! Your speech is about the failed Ritz-Einsten corpuscular model of light... Light is a wave: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arago_spot
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-26 05:25 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o3p2uh$1mun$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #402964 |
On 26/12/16 03:28, alsor@interia.pl wrote: >>>> >>>> SR says the travel times are 2piR/(c+v) and 2piR/(c-v) and the >>>> difference is = 2piR(2v/(c^2-v^2)) = 4Aw /c^2. >>>> Therefore phase difference at receiver is = 4Aw/(c.Lambda) >>>> >>>> BaTh says both travel times are: t = 2piR/c and the path lengths are >>>> (c+v)t and (c-v)t. Therefore the difference in path lengths is 4piRv/c. >>>> Since lambda is constant, the phase difference = 4Aw/(c.lambda) as before. >>>> >>>> So how can two diametrically opposed theories produce the same correct >>>> answer? >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> >>> You should first define what is the BaTh in your stupid speech. >> >> Here is an autographed copy: http://www.scisite.info/wilsonsbath.html > > Oh! Your speech is about the failed Ritz-Einsten corpuscular model of light... It didn't fail. Ritz unfortunately died before he could finish it.. > Light is a wave: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arago_spot Light is not a simple oscillator. It is a spatial 'wave'. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alsor@interia.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-25 10:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4a8d3d2c-e49d-4c79-aa73-ebfef2b6f2c0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #402970 |
W dniu niedziela, 25 grudnia 2016 19:25:25 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > It didn't fail. Ritz unfortunately died before he could finish it.. Indeed. Einstein finished this idiotic idea. > > Light is a wave: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arago_spot > > Light is not a simple oscillator. It is a spatial 'wave'. Spatial wave? Such thing doesn't exist... like the purple rain.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-26 08:12 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o3pcnn$607$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #402974 |
On 26/12/16 05:57, alsor@interia.pl wrote: > W dniu niedziela, 25 grudnia 2016 19:25:25 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > >> It didn't fail. Ritz unfortunately died before he could finish it.. > > > Indeed. Einstein finished this idiotic idea. > >>> Light is a wave: >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arago_spot >> >> Light is not a simple oscillator. It is a spatial 'wave'. > > Spatial wave? > Such thing doesn't exist... like the purple rain. An ocean wave is a spatial wave, you poor fellow. It moves but does not oscillate. It is like a frozen sine wave moving sideways. A radio signal is the same and so, presumably, is light. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-25 19:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <RcKdnd1u15YH7f3FnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #402983 |
On 12/25/16 12/25/16 3:12 PM, HGW wrote: > An ocean wave is a spatial wave, you poor fellow. It moves but does not oscillate. > It is like a frozen sine wave moving sideways. Anyone who has seen ocean waves approach and break on a shoreline knows how inadequate this description is. Ocean waves are a DYNAMIC process.... I don't know what "the wave oscillates" might mean, but it is dead-bang CERTAIN that portions of the water oscillate as the wave goes by. > A radio signal is the same and so, presumably, is light. This is likewise outrageously inadequate: light is NOT A WAVE. Light is a quantum phenomenon MUCH more complicated than any wave. Apparently you are unable to understand this, and prefer your personal fantasies. How sad. Tom Roberts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-26 03:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <411ace33-95a0-4d44-9200-bd634217718a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #402989 |
W dniu poniedziałek, 26 grudnia 2016 02:21:37 UTC+1 użytkownik tjrob137 napisał: > Anyone who has seen ocean waves approach and break on a shoreline knows how > inadequate this description is. Ocean waves are a DYNAMIC process.... > > I don't know what "the wave oscillates" might mean, but it is > dead-bang CERTAIN that portions of the water oscillate as the > wave goes by. > > > A radio signal is the same and so, presumably, is light. > > This is likewise outrageously inadequate: light is NOT A WAVE. Light is a > quantum phenomenon MUCH more complicated than any wave. Anyone who has seen ocean wawes and break on a shoreline knows they are far, far, far more complicated than any mathematical fantasies imagined by a brainwashed moron. Apparently you are unable to understand this, and prefer your personal fantasies. How sad.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-28 11:26 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o3v0rb$cjo$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #402989 |
On 26/12/16 12:21, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 12/25/16 12/25/16 3:12 PM, HGW wrote: >> An ocean wave is a spatial wave, you poor fellow. It moves but does >> not oscillate. >> It is like a frozen sine wave moving sideways. > > Anyone who has seen ocean waves approach and break on a shoreline knows > how inadequate this description is. Ocean waves are a DYNAMIC process.... > > I don't know what "the wave oscillates" might mean, but it is > dead-bang CERTAIN that portions of the water oscillate as the > wave goes by. > >> A radio signal is the same and so, presumably, is light. > > This is likewise outrageously inadequate: light is NOT A WAVE. Light is > a quantum phenomenon MUCH more complicated than any wave. Apparently you > are unable to understand this, and prefer your personal fantasies. How sad. Not so. It is more or less what I said. Light behaves as though it has an intrinsic and absolute wavelength. The actual details of that property or the way it is formed are not known. ...but one thing is certain, Maxwell's equations do not apply to light traveling in space....and nor does any aspect of Einstein's ridiculous theory. > Tom Roberts > --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alsor@interia.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-26 09:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1aa65752-4c0e-4870-a02f-8c6488cf85a4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #402983 |
W dniu niedziela, 25 grudnia 2016 22:12:26 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > On 26/12/16 05:57, alsor@interia.pl wrote: > > W dniu niedziela, 25 grudnia 2016 19:25:25 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > > > >> It didn't fail. Ritz unfortunately died before he could finish it.. > > > > > > Indeed. Einstein finished this idiotic idea. > > > >>> Light is a wave: > >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arago_spot > >> > >> Light is not a simple oscillator. It is a spatial 'wave'. > > > > Spatial wave? > > Such thing doesn't exist... like the purple rain. > > An ocean wave is a spatial wave, you poor fellow. It moves but does not > oscillate. > It is like a frozen sine wave moving sideways. A radio signal is the > same and so, presumably, is light. Wrong analogy. The ocean waves is just an oscillation of the surface (on boundary). Light is not a surface wave, obviously, and unfortunately, to the your improvisation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-28 11:28 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o3v0vi$cjo$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #403029 |
On 27/12/16 04:24, alsor@interia.pl wrote: > W dniu niedziela, 25 grudnia 2016 22:12:26 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: >> On 26/12/16 05:57, alsor@interia.pl wrote: >>> W dniu niedziela, 25 grudnia 2016 19:25:25 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: >>> >>>> It didn't fail. Ritz unfortunately died before he could finish it.. >>> >>> >>> Indeed. Einstein finished this idiotic idea. >>> >>>>> Light is a wave: >>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arago_spot >>>> >>>> Light is not a simple oscillator. It is a spatial 'wave'. >>> >>> Spatial wave? >>> Such thing doesn't exist... like the purple rain. >> >> An ocean wave is a spatial wave, you poor fellow. It moves but does not >> oscillate. >> It is like a frozen sine wave moving sideways. A radio signal is the >> same and so, presumably, is light. > > Wrong analogy. > The ocean waves is just an oscillation of the surface (on boundary). > > Light is not a surface wave, obviously, > and unfortunately, to the your improvisation. Light is not a wave...Roberts said so...and I partly agree... because it has a wavelike spatial pattern. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alsor@interia.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-28 09:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ce6e002d-26b5-40e9-9fb9-d0e804f72e35@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403165 |
W dniu środa, 28 grudnia 2016 01:28:38 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > On 27/12/16 04:24, alsor@interia.pl wrote: > > W dniu niedziela, 25 grudnia 2016 22:12:26 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > >> On 26/12/16 05:57, alsor@interia.pl wrote: > >>> W dniu niedziela, 25 grudnia 2016 19:25:25 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > >>> > >>>> It didn't fail. Ritz unfortunately died before he could finish it.. > >>> > >>> > >>> Indeed. Einstein finished this idiotic idea. > >>> > >>>>> Light is a wave: > >>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arago_spot > >>>> > >>>> Light is not a simple oscillator. It is a spatial 'wave'. > >>> > >>> Spatial wave? > >>> Such thing doesn't exist... like the purple rain. > >> > >> An ocean wave is a spatial wave, you poor fellow. It moves but does not > >> oscillate. > >> It is like a frozen sine wave moving sideways. A radio signal is the > >> same and so, presumably, is light. > > > > Wrong analogy. > > The ocean waves is just an oscillation of the surface (on boundary). > > > > Light is not a surface wave, obviously, > > and unfortunately, to the your improvisation. > > Light is not a wave...Roberts said so...and I partly agree... because it > has a wavelike spatial pattern. You both are very stupid. The one Arago has been disproved your improvisation long time ago...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-29 06:37 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o414a2$1jib$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #403217 |
On 29/12/16 04:56, alsor@interia.pl wrote: > W dniu środa, 28 grudnia 2016 01:28:38 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: >>> >>> Wrong analogy. >>> The ocean waves is just an oscillation of the surface (on boundary). >>> >>> Light is not a surface wave, obviously, >>> and unfortunately, to the your improvisation. >> >> Light is not a wave...Roberts said so...and I partly agree... because it >> has a wavelike spatial pattern. > > You both are very stupid. > > The one Arago has been disproved your improvisation long time ago... Light's 'wave' is spatially configured. It does not vary with time. It induces a time varying 'wave' when intercepted. That explains interference effects. That is so obvious that in the 150 years radio has been going, I am the only person who has realized it. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alsor@interia.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-29 11:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a0897ffb-7895-41ff-b058-44a86e4d1675@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403286 |
W dniu środa, 28 grudnia 2016 20:37:41 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > Light's 'wave' is spatially configured. It does not vary with time. It > induces a time varying 'wave' when intercepted. That explains > interference effects. > > That is so obvious that in the 150 years radio has been going, I am the > only person who has realized it. Indeed. You realised the great nonsense, because only You one - in the whole milenium, are sufficiently stupid to claim such naive nonsense for the public: an experimenter dependency of the time dilation under observation. :) In fact you probably rediscovered the standard SR relativity of simultaneity fallacy: dt = k xv/c^2
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-30 08:03 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o43tmv$1p5o$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #403362 |
On 30/12/16 06:18, alsor@interia.pl wrote: > W dniu środa, 28 grudnia 2016 20:37:41 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > >> Light's 'wave' is spatially configured. It does not vary with time. It >> induces a time varying 'wave' when intercepted. That explains >> interference effects. >> >> That is so obvious that in the 150 years radio has been going, I am the >> only person who has realized it. > > Indeed. You realised the great nonsense, > because only You one - in the whole milenium, > are sufficiently stupid to claim such naive nonsense for the public: > > an experimenter dependency of the time dilation under observation. :) There is NO time dilation. How could TIME be dependent on speed when speed is function of time? > > In fact you probably rediscovered the standard SR relativity of simultaneity fallacy: > dt = k xv/c^2 > I did but not that one. --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alsor@interia.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-29 14:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ef495015-a710-49f4-b5ed-bd3e6edec949@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403371 |
W dniu czwartek, 29 grudnia 2016 22:03:30 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > There is NO time dilation. How could TIME be dependent on speed when > speed is function of time? that's no problem for algebra... what great Einstein showed long time ago: t' = c'/c t -> c = inv, because you change the time delay, using a ligtspeed in a role of the unit of a speed, therefore the value of the lightspeed is preserved like: 1unit = 1unit always and unconditionaly! thus c' = c = 1 unit. That is the key of the relativistic stupidity. > > In fact you probably rediscovered the standard SR relativity of simultaneity fallacy: > > dt = k xv/c^2 > I did but not that one. Then wrong, because the one is correct only.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-30 11:23 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o449du$b3a$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #403386 |
On 30/12/16 09:10, alsor@interia.pl wrote: > W dniu czwartek, 29 grudnia 2016 22:03:30 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > >> There is NO time dilation. How could TIME be dependent on speed when >> speed is function of time? > > that's no problem for algebra... > what great Einstein showed long time ago: > > t' = c'/c t -> c = inv, > because you change the time delay, > using a ligtspeed in a role of the unit of a speed, > therefore the value of the lightspeed is preserved like: > > 1unit = 1unit always and unconditionaly! > thus c' = c = 1 unit. Your '1unit' has dimensions, dopey...in this case L/T. > That is the key of the relativistic stupidity. > >>> In fact you probably rediscovered the standard SR relativity of simultaneity fallacy: >>> dt = k xv/c^2 > >> I did but not that one. > > Then wrong, because the one is correct only. My proof is correct: http://www.scisite.info/ros.html --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alsor@interia.pl |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-30 11:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8e47eaa0-81e9-40db-b2ea-509272c10ba3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #403403 |
W dniu piątek, 30 grudnia 2016 01:23:30 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > On 30/12/16 09:10, alsor@interia.pl wrote: > > W dniu czwartek, 29 grudnia 2016 22:03:30 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > > > >> There is NO time dilation. How could TIME be dependent on speed when > >> speed is function of time? > > > > that's no problem for algebra... > > what great Einstein showed long time ago: > > > > t' = c'/c t -> c = inv, > > because you change the time delay, > > using a ligtspeed in a role of the unit of a speed, > > therefore the value of the lightspeed is preserved like: > > > > 1unit = 1unit always and unconditionaly! > > thus c' = c = 1 unit. > > Your '1unit' has dimensions, dopey...in this case L/T. The unit for a speed in the relativity is simply: 1 unit = a light speed. You should notice there is nothing about c = const, because it's totaly irrelevant for that definition of the unit! for example: A. the light speed wrt a moving frame along of the motion, means: horisontaly, is c - v, thus the unit of the speed is c-v. therefore: c-v -> c automaticaly! Why? Because the light speed has been predefined to the c value. B. the speed of light, in any moving frame and perpendiculary to the motion is: c*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) so, what is now the speed of light (with the choosed unit for speed)? Simply: in the unit of a speed is: c*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2), because this is the light speed in this case. Therefore the light speed perpendicularily to the motion dir. is: c, again! Why? Because we use just the light speed as the unit of speed! > > That is the key of the relativistic stupidity. > > > >>> In fact you probably rediscovered the standard SR relativity of simultaneity fallacy: > >>> dt = k xv/c^2 > > > >> I did but not that one. > > > > Then wrong, because the one is correct only. > > My proof is correct: http://www.scisite.info/ros.html > > > > --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-31 07:31 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o46g7d$5bi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #403507 |
On 31/12/16 06:52, alsor@interia.pl wrote: >>> >>> 1unit = 1unit always and unconditionaly! >>> thus c' = c = 1 unit. >> >> Your '1unit' has dimensions, dopey...in this case L/T. > > > The unit for a speed in the relativity is simply: > 1 unit = a light speed. > > You should notice there is nothing about c = const, > because it's totaly irrelevant for that definition of the unit! c is a universal constant, dimensions L/T, with a defined value of 299792458 metres per second. c is not to be confused with the speed of light. which can have almost any value, although as far as we know, all EM does initially move at a speed equal to c relative to its source. > for example: > A. the light speed wrt a moving frame along of the motion, > means: horisontaly, is c - v, > thus the unit of the speed is c-v. > > therefore: c-v -> c automaticaly! > Why? Because the light speed has been predefined to the c value. > > B. the speed of light, in any moving frame > and perpendiculary to the motion is: c*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) > > so, what is now the speed of light (with the choosed unit for speed)? > > Simply: in the unit of a speed is: c*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2), > because this is the light speed in this case. > > Therefore the light speed perpendicularily to the motion dir. is: c, > again! > > Why? Because we use just the light speed as the unit of speed! Yes...It is stupid. In reality, all speeds are frame dependent by definition. >>> That is the key of the relativistic stupidity. >>> >>>>> In fact you probably rediscovered the standard SR relativity of simultaneity fallacy: >>>>> dt = k xv/c^2 >>> >>>> I did but not that one. >>> >>> Then wrong, because the one is correct only. >> >> My proof is correct: http://www.scisite.info/ros.html >> >> >> >> -- > --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eckard B <eckard.blumschein@arcor.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-04 03:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4a153d55-41c0-45f9-b5a9-2ddfec89fae6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #402923 |
Am Samstag, 24. Dezember 2016 15:53:55 UTC+1 schrieb al...@interia.pl: > W dniu sobota, 24 grudnia 2016 09:02:32 UTC+1 użytkownik HGW napisał: > > When viewed in the inertial frame, both SR and BaTh agree that the two > > beams of a ring gyro travel different distances. SR says both beams move > > at c in the non-rotating frame and have different travel times, Bath > > says the travel times are the same. SR says light is a simple oscillator > > and since both rays leave together, they must reunite with different > > phase. BaTh says light does not oscillate during travel but has a fixed > > wavelength. > > > > SR says the travel times are 2piR/(c+v) and 2piR/(c-v) and the > > difference is = 2piR(2v/(c^2-v^2)) = 4Aw /c^2. > > Therefore phase difference at receiver is = 4Aw/(c.Lambda) > > > > BaTh says both travel times are: t = 2piR/c and the path lengths are > > (c+v)t and (c-v)t. Therefore the difference in path lengths is 4piRv/c. > > Since lambda is constant, the phase difference = 4Aw/(c.lambda) as before. > > > > So how can two diametrically opposed theories produce the same correct > > answer? > > > > > > -- > > You should first define what is the BaTh in your stupid speech. I also didn't understand what is meant with Bath. Before I understood that Ba stands for ballistic and is therefore at odds with my definition, I googled in vain for Bath. Of course, I was aware of the University of Bath.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HGW <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-05 08:32 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o4jpm7$1hjs$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #403950 |
On 04/01/17 22:51, Eckard B wrote: > Am Samstag, 24. Dezember 2016 15:53:55 UTC+1 schrieb >>> BaTh says both travel times are: t = 2piR/c and the path lengths >>> are (c+v)t and (c-v)t. Therefore the difference in path lengths >>> is 4piRv/c. Since lambda is constant, the phase difference = >>> 4Aw/(c.lambda) as before. >>> >>> So how can two diametrically opposed theories produce the same >>> correct answer? >>> >>> >>> -- >> >> You should first define what is the BaTh in your stupid speech. > > I also didn't understand what is meant with Bath. Before I understood > that Ba stands for ballistic and is therefore at odds with my > definition, I googled in vain for Bath. Of course, I was aware of the > University of Bath. www.scisite.info/wilsonsbath.html --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-24 16:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <o3m85e$ot4$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #402911 |
HGW <hw@....> writes: >When viewed in the inertial frame, both SR and BaTh agree that Nobody cares what BaTh states since it is a failed theory. If BaTh happens to come up with a correct answer for once, all it means is that even though BaTh is wrong, it's not ALWAYS wrong 100% of the time. A stopped clock, a blind squirrel and so forth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web