Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #398314 > unrolled thread

BaTh. The full Theory

Started byHGW <hw@....>
First post2016-11-12 10:50 +1100
Last post2016-11-12 20:57 +0000
Articles 15 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity


Contents

  BaTh. The full Theory HGW <hw@....> - 2016-11-12 10:50 +1100
    Re: BaTh. The full Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-12 03:20 +0000
      Re: BaTh. The full Theory "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-11-13 04:54 +1100
        Re: BaTh. The full Theory moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-13 03:54 +0000
          Re: BaTh. The full Theory kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-11-13 06:37 -0800
            Re: BaTh. The full Theory Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-11-13 22:29 +0100
              Re: BaTh. The full Theory Gwyneth Montgomery <GwynethMont@MontgomeryInstitute.info> - 2016-11-13 22:32 +0000
                Re: BaTh. The full Theory HGW <hw@....> - 2016-11-14 11:02 +1100
    Re: BaTh. The full Theory Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 01:21 -0800
      Re: BaTh. The full Theory "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-11-13 04:16 +1100
        Re: BaTh. The full Theory Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 10:05 -0800
          Re: BaTh. The full Theory "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-11-13 06:08 +1100
            Re: BaTh. The full Theory Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 12:43 -0800
    Re: BaTh. The full Theory Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-12 08:02 -0800
      Re: BaTh. The full Theory Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-11-12 20:57 +0000

#398314 — BaTh. The full Theory

FromHGW <hw@....>
Date2016-11-12 10:50 +1100
SubjectBaTh. The full Theory
Message-ID<o05lfb$sg6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
You can see the complete beta version of my thesis here:
http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/Wilson's Bath.html

...it is copyrighted.
-- 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#398319

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-11-12 03:20 +0000
Message-ID<o061q0$3a9$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#398314
HGW <hw@....> writes:

>You can see the complete beta version of my thesis here:
>http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/Rabbige's Bath.html

>...it is copyrighted.

Sorry, Ralph, but that link doesn't work.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#398344

From"HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....>
Date2016-11-13 04:54 +1100
Message-ID<o07l04$1rtq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#398319
On 12/11/16 14:20, Michael Moroney wrote:
> HGW <hw@....> writes:
>
>> You can see the complete beta version of my thesis here:
>> http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/Rabbige's Bath.html
>
>> ...it is copyrighted.
>
> Sorry, Ralph, but that link doesn't work.
>
http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/wilsonsBath.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#398390

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2016-11-13 03:54 +0000
Message-ID<o08o6d$da9$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#398344
"HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> writes:

>http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/rabbigesBath.html

Excuse me sir, I am a new user here. I wish to read your wonderful theory,
but the link doesn't work.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#398409

Fromkenseto <setoken@att.net>
Date2016-11-13 06:37 -0800
Message-ID<073c4e5e-a6e6-4f60-b1ff-56741cf0a707@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#398390
On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 10:54:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> writes:
> 
> >http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/rabbigesBath.html
> 
> Excuse me sir, I am a new user here. I wish to read your wonderful theory,
> but the link doesn't work.

No wonder your name is moron-y. He gave the corrected link as follows:
http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/wilsonsBath.html 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#398443

FromDirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not>
Date2016-11-13 22:29 +0100
Message-ID<o0alv1$552$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#398409
Op 13-nov-2016 om 15:37 schreef kenseto:
> On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 10:54:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> writes:
>>
>>> http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/rabbigesBath.html
>>
>> Excuse me sir, I am a new user here. I wish to read your wonderful theory,
>> but the link doesn't work.
>
> No wonder your name is moron-y. He gave the corrected link as follows:
> http://www.shitsite.info/books/bath/wilsonsBath.html

That link does not work either.

Dirk Vdm

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#398446

FromGwyneth Montgomery <GwynethMont@MontgomeryInstitute.info>
Date2016-11-13 22:32 +0000
Message-ID<o0apkv$aq7$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#398443
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:

> Op 13-nov-2016 om 15:37 schreef kenseto:
>> On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 10:54:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney
>> wrote:
>>> "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> writes:
>>>
>>>> http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/rabbigesBath.html
>>>
>>> Excuse me sir, I am a new user here. I wish to read your wonderful
>>> theory,
>>> but the link doesn't work.
>>
>> No wonder your name is moron-y. He gave the corrected link as follows:
>> http://www.shitsite.info/books/bath/wilsonsBath.html
> 
> That link does not work either.

Maybe just you, not knowing how to press buttons.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#398458

FromHGW <hw@....>
Date2016-11-14 11:02 +1100
Message-ID<o0auv8$i0e$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#398446
On 14/11/16 09:32, Gwyneth Montgomery wrote:
> Dirk Van de moortel wrote:

>>>
>>> No wonder your name is moron-y. He gave the corrected link as follows:
>>> http://www.shitsite.info/books/bath/wilsonsBath.html
>>
>> That link does not work either.
>
> Maybe just you, not knowing how to press buttons.

He is obviously looking at his own site.
>


-- 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#398324

FromProkaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-12 01:21 -0800
Message-ID<0bac743f-32cd-477f-9ab5-d28e33bd85ac@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#398314
On Friday, November 11, 2016 at 5:50:07 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote:
> You can see the complete beta version of my thesis here:
> http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/Wilson's Bath.html
> 
> ...it is copyrighted.
> --

Creating links with spaces is pretty silly. I had to replace the space with
the ascii representation of a space %20 before I could see your page.

It wasn't worth the effort. Nothing but a slight extension of the tedious
fantasy that you've been peddling for the last twenty years.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#398343

From"HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....>
Date2016-11-13 04:16 +1100
Message-ID<o07ips$1nu6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#398324
On 12/11/16 20:21, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:
> On Friday, November 11, 2016 at 5:50:07 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote:
>> You can see the complete beta version of my thesis here:
>> http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/Wilson's Bath.html
>>
>> ...it is copyrighted.
>> --
>
> Creating links with spaces is pretty silly. I had to replace the space with
> the ascii representation of a space %20 before I could see your page.
>
> It wasn't worth the effort. Nothing but a slight extension of the tedious
> fantasy that you've been peddling for the last twenty years.

If people here want to criticize BaTh they should at least try to 
understand what it is. My paper will also help them learn why Einstein's 
silly plagiarized version of LET is so amusing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#398345

FromProkaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-12 10:05 -0800
Message-ID<9c617fdf-6d5c-45f5-af2d-0551145d0ede@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#398343
On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 11:16:52 AM UTC-6, HGWilson, DSc. wrote:
> On 12/11/16 20:21, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:
> > On Friday, November 11, 2016 at 5:50:07 PM UTC-6, HGW wrote:
> >> You can see the complete beta version of my thesis here:
> >> http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/Wilson's Bath.html
> >>
> >> ...it is copyrighted.
> >> --
> >
> > Creating links with spaces is pretty silly. I had to replace the space with
> > the ascii representation of a space %20 before I could see your page.
> >
> > It wasn't worth the effort. Nothing but a slight extension of the tedious
> > fantasy that you've been peddling for the last twenty years.
> 
> If people here want to criticize BaTh they should at least try to 
> understand what it is. 

I understand BaTh *much* better than you do.

Which is why I reject it.

> My paper will also help them learn why Einstein's 
> silly plagiarized version of LET is so amusing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#398349

From"HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....>
Date2016-11-13 06:08 +1100
Message-ID<o07pbd$3ji$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#398345
On 13/11/16 05:05, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:
> On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 11:16:52 AM UTC-6, HGWilson, DSc. wrote:

>>>
>>> It wasn't worth the effort. Nothing but a slight extension of the tedious
>>> fantasy that you've been peddling for the last twenty years.
>>
>> If people here want to criticize BaTh they should at least try to
>> understand what it is.
>
> I understand BaTh *much* better than you do.

You don't. You have no idea.

> Which is why I reject it.

You reject it because you are a typical indoctrinated fool who gets an 
ego boost by quoting Einstein's silly fantasy.

>> My paper will also help them learn why Einstein's
>> silly plagiarized version of LET is so amusing.
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#398355

FromProkaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com>
Date2016-11-12 12:43 -0800
Message-ID<2d841e48-4a42-4c01-a210-0d303c1a2205@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#398349
On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 1:08:32 PM UTC-6, HGWilson, DSc. wrote:
> On 13/11/16 05:05, Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog wrote:
> > On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 11:16:52 AM UTC-6, HGWilson, DSc. wrote:
> 
> > I understand BaTh *much* better than you do.
> 
> You don't. You have no idea.

You are too incompetent to understand most of the implications of your own
theory.

> > Which is why I reject it.
> 
> You reject it because you are a typical indoctrinated fool who gets an 
> ego boost by quoting Einstein's silly fantasy.

You accept it because you do not have enough understanding of BaTh to make
quantitative predictions that you can compare with experiment.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#398339

FromGary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com>
Date2016-11-12 08:02 -0800
Message-ID<e17269fa-3900-43c9-8c4d-4a58d2fda1fa@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#398314
On Friday, November 11, 2016 at 4:50:07 PM UTC-7, HGW wrote:
>
> You can see the complete beta version of my thesis here:
> http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/Wilson's Bath.html
> 
> ...it is copyrighted.
> --

“Your manuscript is both good and original.  However, that which is good
is not original, and that which is original is not good.” -- Samuel Johnson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#398358

FromNed Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz>
Date2016-11-12 20:57 +0000
Message-ID<slrno2f0i5.7hi.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz>
In reply to#398339
Gawy Fuck Knuckle wrote:
> HGW wrote:
> >
> > You can see the complete beta version of my thesis here:
> > http://www.scisite.info/books/bath/Wilson's Bath.html
> >
> > ...it is copyrighted.
>
> "Your manuscript is both good and original.
> However, that which is good is not original,
> and that which is original is not good."
> -- Samuel Johnson

Your quote is both hackneyed and boring.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web