Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #391831 > unrolled thread
| Started by | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-08 20:06 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-10-09 11:40 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 182 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-08 20:06 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 07:49 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-08 23:03 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 08:55 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-09 00:29 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-09 06:49 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-09 08:19 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-09 09:17 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-09 09:34 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-09 09:53 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-09 21:52 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-09 20:29 -0500
Re: Gravitational Physics John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-09 18:39 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Python <python@python.invalid> - 2016-09-10 03:42 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics alsor@interia.pl - 2016-09-11 17:08 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-20 23:14 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 14:33 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-23 00:07 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 00:33 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-23 00:46 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 07:08 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-24 12:07 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 11:28 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-25 11:50 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 11:19 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-25 22:11 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 15:35 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-25 23:29 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 00:01 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-26 00:10 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 09:44 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-26 23:30 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 01:57 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-27 02:51 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 04:12 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-27 04:59 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 09:06 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-27 18:16 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 10:52 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 09:15 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-27 19:56 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 16:47 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-27 23:25 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 11:16 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-28 22:55 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 11:39 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-09-27 21:55 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 16:43 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-27 23:37 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 04:18 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-28 05:01 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 06:21 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 11:38 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-28 23:02 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 14:42 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-29 23:33 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 11:47 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-10-01 20:47 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:04 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-10-02 00:20 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 21:00 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-10-04 12:49 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-04 07:18 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-04 07:27 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 11:21 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-04 23:57 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 15:59 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-05 23:38 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-06 02:46 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 12:26 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-06 23:36 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 00:05 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-07 00:42 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 12:09 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-10-07 23:47 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 15:20 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-10-08 01:41 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 12:19 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 19:44 -0500
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-09 23:15 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 16:29 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-10 23:23 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 23:52 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-11 01:16 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 04:15 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-11 05:05 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 05:32 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-11 05:41 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 14:22 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-12 01:32 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 13:13 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 14:17 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Scott <Scott@oe0vgk3s.info> - 2016-10-11 21:23 +0000
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 14:20 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-11 23:21 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 23:38 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-11 23:54 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 13:03 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-10-12 22:43 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 13:56 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-10-12 23:12 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 15:01 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-10-13 14:53 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 11:59 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-10-13 22:23 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 13:56 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-13 23:11 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 07:36 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 07:42 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-14 08:04 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-24 15:20 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-24 22:33 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-24 22:37 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 13:23 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-10-15 15:39 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 12:46 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Jim Barthel <jimbart@portlanportal.info> - 2016-10-19 19:54 +0000
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-19 23:25 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 07:55 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 13:31 -0500
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 16:12 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 19:14 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-27 23:28 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 11:42 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-28 23:05 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 14:45 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-09 16:51 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 02:55 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-09 19:56 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 07:41 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-09 19:59 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-09 20:01 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-09 20:05 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-09 21:11 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-10 14:54 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-10 15:03 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-10 17:48 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-11 12:56 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-14 12:23 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-14 16:39 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-15 15:29 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-15 15:44 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-16 18:09 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-17 13:22 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-17 13:41 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-17 14:27 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-18 13:17 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-19 01:45 +0000
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-18 18:57 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-19 02:46 +0000
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-18 20:00 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-19 15:42 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-20 02:49 +0000
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-19 19:55 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-20 14:13 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-21 10:51 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics akashaheights@gmail.com - 2016-09-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 12:07 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-23 14:14 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-26 15:51 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-27 11:47 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-27 12:58 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-28 10:06 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 09:12 +0200
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-28 10:07 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-28 12:10 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-30 12:51 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-01 12:22 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-02 11:25 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-03 07:49 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-03 08:13 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-03 08:23 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-03 09:20 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-03 09:31 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-03 10:05 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 15:57 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 14:30 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-07 11:03 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-08 15:15 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-08 17:03 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-08 17:17 -0700
Re: Gravitational Physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-09 11:40 -0700
Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 Next page →
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 15:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <011a56f0-17ad-4d68-b1da-3eb5bbe1e3b4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
Gravity physics is based on Maxwell's electromagnetic theory that is represented with Faraday's induction effect that cannot
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 15:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bddb1b4f-6a52-4f26-b7f9-da0e526e3db3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
Gravity physics is based on Maxwell's electromagnetic theory that is represented with Faraday's induction effect that cannot be used to represent gravity. A magnetic force produced by a magnet is not a gravitational force. The electromagnetic gravity waves have the frequency and structure of sound waves. These gravity sound wave propagate at the velocity of light and in vacuum. It like physicists have completely disregarded fundamental physics and lost their minds. It's similar to Hilary's legalized corruption concealed using speaker fees and Foundation donations or the USA opposing the Israel building of Illegal settlement yet giving 38 billion dollar in Aid while and doing nothing to stop the illegal settlement that cause of the tension in the Middle east. While the USA give away 38 billion dollar to a foreign country the flood victims of Lusisiana get 38 million is relief.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 18:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <431b6db2-0315-43bb-869d-f7037ac1c7ed@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
The electromagnetic gravity wave have a frequency range of 10^-7 to 10^4 Hz but an electromagnetic gravity wave with a frequency of 10^-7 Hz forms a wavelength of 10^15 meters that is more than a light year in length!! A gravity wave with a frequency of 10^4 Hz represents sound but sound cannot propagate in the vacuum of stellar space nor can sound propagate at the velocity of light. Also, the LIGO gravity waves have a frequency of 35 to 250 Hz that produce an acoustical vibration of the armature of Michelson-Morley interferometer forming a signal of the gravity waves but the LIGO gravity waves represent the frequency of sound that are propagating in the vacuum of celestial space at the velocity of light.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-17 13:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7cd7ca2c-bbe2-4281-879a-99d6bfe97dfd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
Gravity physics is based on sound waves that are represented with an electromagnetic field structure that propagates at the velocity of light, in vacuum. The sound waves are used to form a signal but sound waves form a force that only repels.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-17 13:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ec57f44a-2878-4b4c-b20c-0fee57120383@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #392745 |
On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 3:22:03 PM UTC-5, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote: > Gravity physics is based on sound waves that are represented with an electromagnetic field structure that propagates at the velocity of light, in vacuum. The sound waves are used to form a signal but sound waves form a force that only repels. Space time is Electromagnetic 376.73^2 Making the Curvature of Space time (Gravity) Electromagnetic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-17 14:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f0869e05-4760-493b-b858-8cf390aeaed1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
Space time is Electromagnetic 376.73^2 Making the Curvature of Space time (Gravity) Electromagnetic-----Fuller ________________________________________________________________ Explain Weber frequency of 1662 Hz for a gravity wave. I hope that you didn't believe the Einstein's horse shit since Maxwell's electromagnetic theory is based on Faraday's induction effect that is not represent a gravitational effect because the rocks, in your head, are effected by gravity but are unaffected by a magnet. Try explaining space time curvature gravitational effects using ping pong balls!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 13:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <144139d8-05d2-4e2c-9402-03689fcc6d94@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
The electromagnetic gravity wave have a frequency range of 10^-7 to 10^4 Hz but an electromagnetic gravity wave with a frequency of 10^-7 Hz forms a wavelength of 10^15 meters that is more than a light year in length!! WOW. A gravity wave with a frequency of 10^4 Hz represents sound but sound cannot propagate in the vacuum of stellar space nor can sound propagate at the velocity of light. Furthermore, the LIGO gravitational wave experiment detected electromagnetic gravity waves, that originated from the merging of two black holes more than 1.3 billion light years from the earth. The LIGO gravity waves have a frequency of 35 to 250 Hz that produce an acoustical vibration of the armature of Michelson-Morley interferometer forming a signal that is used to justify the existence of gravity waves but the LIGO gravity waves represent the frequency of sound that are propagating in the vacuum of celestial space at the velocity of light.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 01:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nrng0c$jao$7@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #392852 |
numbernumber1964@gmail.com writes: <snip babble> Frequency of sound is not sound. Sound is not gravity waves. Sound is a compression wave in some material. Nor are electromagnetic waves with the frequency of sound sound. For example, they communicate with submarines with electromagnetic waves with the frequency of sound. It is not sound, it is electromagnetic frequency. They do this because that frequency can be received by the submarine anywhere in the world. (and the transmitter was usually located in a place like Minnesota, far from the ocean) Similarly for gravitational waves. Gravitational waves with the frequency of sound (or any other frequency) can travel through the vacuum of space even if actual sound can't.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 18:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0912a02f-22fa-46e7-9690-b182695e5508@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
"Gravitational waves with the frequency of sound (or any other frequency) can travel through the vacuum of space even if actual sound can't." _----_____------_________------_______-------_______------_____ LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 02:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nrnji8$oh2$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #392885 |
numbernumber1964@gmail.com writes: >"Gravitational waves with the frequency of sound (or any other frequency) can travel through the vacuum of space even if actual sound can't." >_----_____------_________------_______-------_______------_____ >LOL Too bad you decided to just LOL rather than learn from your mistake. I noticed you snipped the bit about electromagnetic waves with the frequency of sound, yet aren't sound.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 20:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <77ea8db8-4436-4810-910d-7d016b577146@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
I noticed you snipped the bit about electromagnetic waves with the frequency of sound, yet aren't sound. ___________________________________________ LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 15:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <85af7062-f8f0-4af6-8ae5-18fc91c0316a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
The electromagnetic gravity wave have a frequency range of 10^-7 to 10^4 Hz but an electromagnetic gravity wave with a frequency of 10^-7 Hz forms a wavelength of 10^15 meters that is more than a light year in length!! WOW. A gravity wave with a frequency of 10^4 Hz represents sound but sound cannot propagate in the vacuum of stellar space nor can sound propagate at the velocity of light. Furthermore, the LIGO gravitational wave experiment detected electromagnetic gravity waves, that originated from the merging of two black holes more than 1.3 billion light years from the earth. The LIGO gravity waves have a frequency of 35 to 250 Hz that produce an acoustical vibration of the armature of Michelson-Morley interferometer forming a signal that is used to justify the existence of gravity waves but the LIGO gravity waves represent the frequency of sound that are propagating in the vacuum of celestial space at the velocity of light.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 02:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nrq843$5i5$4@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #393012 |
numbernumber1964@gmail.com writes: <snip crap> Reposting something already proven false doesn't make it true, either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 19:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fc8e62aa-e018-453e-a586-5166c4a4f4f2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
The electromagnetic gravity wave have a frequency range of 10^-7 to 10^4 Hz but an electromagnetic gravity wave with a frequency of 10^-7 Hz forms a wavelength of 10^15 meters that is more than a light year in length!! WOW. A gravity wave with a frequency of 10^4 Hz represents sound but sound cannot propagate in the vacuum of stellar space nor can sound propagate at the velocity of light. Furthermore, the LIGO gravitational wave experiment detected electromagnetic gravity waves, that originated from the merging of two black holes more than 1.3 billion light years from the earth. The LIGO gravity waves have a frequency of 35 to 250 Hz that produce an acoustical vibration of the armature of Michelson-Morley interferometer forming a signal that is used to justify the existence of gravity waves but the LIGO gravity waves represent the frequency of sound that are propagating in the vacuum of celestial space at the velocity of light.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 14:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d7e568d7-2400-4cd2-9142-94c17fc2145f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
According to modern physicists, electromagnetic gravity wave have a frequency range of 10^-7 to 10^4 Hz but a gravity wave with a frequency of 10^-7 Hz forms a wavelength of 10^15 meters that is more than a light year in length!! WOW. A gravity wave with a frequency of 10^4 Hz represents sound but sound cannot propagate in the vacuum of stellar space nor can sound propagate at the velocity of light. The sound wave gravity wave corresponds with Weber's gravity experiment that detected celestial gravity waves that have the frequency of 1662 Hz using a 760 pound Al beam. The 1662 Hz is the same frequency that is made by a digital alarm clock! What a humorous coincidence. Maybe Weber was taking a nap. Furthermore, the LIGO gravitational wave experiment detected electromagnetic gravity waves, that originated from the merging of two black holes more than 1.3 billion light years from the earth. The LIGO gravity waves have a frequency of 35 to 250 Hz that produce an acoustical vibration of the armature of the interferometer forming a signal that is used to justify the existence of gravity waves but the LIGO gravity waves represent the frequency of sound that are propagating in the vacuum of celestial space at the velocity of light. Note that the acoustical vibration of the interferometer is causing the signal of the interferometer used to justify gravity physics which represents a 50,000 thousand dollar US research grant to MIT. Money well sent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-21 10:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <43640a21-4bb4-422a-bdb9-cbef5e969165@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
Gravity physics is based on sound wave analogy but sound waves do not propagate in vacuum nor does sound propagate a the velocity of light. The LIGO gravitational wave experiment detected electromagnetic gravity waves, that originated from the merging of two black holes more than 1.3 billion light years from the earth. The LIGO gravity waves have a frequency of 35 to 250 Hz that produce an acoustical vibration of the armature of the interferometer forming a signal that is used to justify the existence of gravity waves but the LIGO gravity waves represent the frequency of sound that are propagating in the vacuum of celestial space at the velocity of light. Note that the acoustical vibration of the interferometer is causing the signal of the interferometer used to justify gravity physics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | akashaheights@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 13:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6e5a742d-52d0-4a08-9a5e-3413b2860162@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
Gravity physics is based on a sound wave analogy since Weber detected gravity waves with a frequency of 1662 Hz and the LIGO detected gravity waves of frequencies between 35 to 250 Hz which proves gravity physics is a scientific hoax.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 12:07 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ns2urs$3vv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #393403 |
On 09/22/2016 10:35 PM, akashaheights@gmail.com wrote: > Gravity physics is based on a sound wave analogy since Weber detected gravity waves with a frequency of 1662 Hz and the LIGO detected gravity waves of frequencies between 35 to 250 Hz which proves gravity physics is a scientific hoax. > The only proven thing is the misunderstanding that sound-like frequencies have something to do with sound.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-23 14:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e5fa27e7-aa7f-4d27-8c1a-60bd0a830191@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
There is precedence that theoretical physics is based on deception that is depicted when people deny that the frequencies of sound that is used to representing gravity waves represent sound. The reason sound is necessary is because to produce a detectable signal requires an affect and sound is a possible force that can be experimentally detected the other possibility is electromagnetic radiation. In fact Webber states that sound is shielded from his gravity experiment but it would be hard to explain if the beam detector is shielded from sound how Webber's beam detected the gravity waves that have a frequency of sound since Webber's detector is detecting sound. They explain this with abstract physics which is ludicrous since the acoustical gravity waves violates fundamental physics which is justify by a separation of classical and theoretical physics. This deception is similar to the parallel deception regarding the wave theory of light where light waves are formed by the motion of an optical ether, composed of matter, yet light propagates in vacuum that is void of matter. It should be obvious that a deception is occurring since Huygens excuse is that the optical ether, composed of matter, penetrates the glass vacuum tube, but matter cannot propagate through matter without producing a hole, in the glass or shattering the glass which is similar to particle physics where a subatomic particle propagates through the steel enclosure of the bubble chamber which is not possible since muons that are 200 times more massive than an electron are used to justify subatomic particle propagating through the steel enclosure of the bubble chamber that would result in an explosion of the bubble chamber which is the reason that half the NASA rocket launches end up exploding.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-26 15:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3fd427d6-dc0d-4028-bcec-6184c8cf22cf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391831 |
"Frequency of sound is not sound. Sound is not gravity waves. Sound is a compression wave in some material. Nor are electromagnetic waves with the frequency of sound sound. For example, they communicate with submarines with electromagnetic waves with the frequency of sound. It is not sound, it is electromagnetic frequency. They do this because that frequency can be received by the submarine anywhere in the world. (and the transmitter was usually located in a place like Minnesota, far from the ocean) Similarly for gravitational waves. Gravitational waves with the frequency of sound (or any other frequency) can travel through the vacuum of space even if actual sound can't." (Michael Moroney, Sept 18). To produce a revolution is physics requires a change to prevent statement like the one above from being made. LOL.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web