Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #391989 > unrolled thread
| Started by | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-10 15:26 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-10-09 11:39 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 254 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-10 15:26 -0700
Re: Particle physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-10 17:59 -0500
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-10 16:16 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-10 16:18 -0700
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-10 16:47 -0700
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-11 00:15 +0000
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-10 17:30 -0700
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-10 19:03 -0700
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-11 04:19 +0000
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-10 17:53 -0700
Re: Particle physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-11 05:35 +0200
Re: Particle physics Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-09-21 13:16 +1000
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-11 13:12 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-14 12:35 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-14 16:53 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-14 20:36 -0700
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-15 15:24 +0000
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-15 14:43 -0700
Re: Particle physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-15 17:25 -0500
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 03:14 +0000
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-15 15:50 -0700
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-16 03:20 +0000
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-16 18:01 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-17 16:30 -0700
Re: Particle physics Michael Moroney <moroney@TheWorld.com> - 2016-09-18 03:12 +0000
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-18 13:10 -0700
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-19 01:06 +0000
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-18 17:52 -0700
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-19 14:26 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 11:29 -0500
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-18 18:41 -0700
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-19 15:12 +0000
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-18 18:46 -0700
Re: Particle physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-09-19 14:31 +0000
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-19 15:21 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-19 23:44 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 08:37 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-20 17:51 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-22 13:42 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-22 21:54 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 07:02 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-23 22:13 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 12:42 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-25 02:29 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 16:59 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-26 02:42 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 08:18 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-26 14:32 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 09:46 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-26 22:00 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 08:48 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-28 11:47 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 09:25 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-29 00:34 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 10:05 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 01:52 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 07:19 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 02:22 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 07:27 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 14:08 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:20 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 16:50 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 12:26 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-01 16:57 +0000
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 02:30 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 07:56 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 14:12 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:31 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 16:56 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 14:59 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-02 02:33 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:00 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-02 02:47 +0000
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 02:35 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 08:02 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 02:43 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 08:09 -0500
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-01 16:52 +0200
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 02:53 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 08:12 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 14:20 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:33 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 17:05 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:00 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-02 02:40 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-01 20:50 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-02 05:28 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-02 04:39 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-02 12:07 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-02 05:52 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-02 14:05 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-02 07:33 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-02 21:42 +0000
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-02 22:01 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-02 15:07 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 01:35 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-02 19:49 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 03:58 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-03 04:43 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 13:46 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 20:35 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 17:06 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 22:48 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-03 15:08 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 22:49 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 09:30 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 22:11 +0000
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 22:18 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 09:56 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 03:05 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 07:45 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 13:50 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 09:35 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 20:47 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 16:22 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-08 14:35 +0000
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 03:07 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 08:14 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 03:18 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 08:17 -0500
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-01 16:57 +0200
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 04:03 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 08:19 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 14:25 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:47 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 17:15 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 14:59 -0500
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 08:29 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 14:48 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:55 -0500
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 10:20 -0500
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 10:38 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 17:46 +0000
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 17:33 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 08:23 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 14:17 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 12:30 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 20:50 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 16:04 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 22:33 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 09:54 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-05 02:47 +0000
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-05 06:09 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 16:24 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 22:38 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 09:54 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-05 02:26 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-05 04:31 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-05 17:04 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 13:06 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-06 00:08 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 09:14 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 02:22 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-06 07:23 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 02:52 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-06 21:25 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 06:16 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-07 06:44 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 20:29 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-07 20:08 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-08 14:17 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-08 15:18 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-09 02:42 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-09 04:50 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-09 12:42 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-09 06:19 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-09 20:34 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-09 19:24 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-10 03:11 +0000
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-10 03:20 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-10 04:24 -0700
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-10 14:20 +0000
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-10 03:21 +0000
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-09 02:44 +0000
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 09:25 +0000
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 12:22 +0000
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-07 12:25 +0000
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-01 17:01 +0200
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 04:21 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 08:54 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 16:33 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 12:25 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-01 16:51 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:52 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-02 02:09 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 09:21 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 22:04 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 17:16 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-03 23:19 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 09:54 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-05 02:33 +0000
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-05 18:11 +0200
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 14:26 -0500
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-01 10:16 +0200
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-01 17:36 +0000
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-01 20:53 +0200
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-02 02:18 +0000
Re: Particle physics Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-10-05 18:00 +0200
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-10-05 17:29 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 17:01 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-26 02:39 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 08:18 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-26 14:22 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-26 09:44 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-26 21:42 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 06:12 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-28 10:59 +0000
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-28 04:46 -0700
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 09:09 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-28 20:05 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 16:35 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-29 12:13 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 10:22 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-30 01:40 +0000
Re: Particle physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 07:16 -0500
Re: Particle physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-28 10:38 -0500
Re: Particle physics Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-09-28 20:21 +0000
Re: Particle physics Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-28 20:35 -0500
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-19 17:19 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-20 09:11 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-20 12:17 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-20 15:23 -0700
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-20 20:06 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-20 16:09 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-21 10:56 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-21 10:58 -0700
Re: Particle physics akashaheights@gmail.com - 2016-09-22 13:46 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-23 14:34 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-24 11:52 -0700
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-24 15:17 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-24 16:03 -0700
Re: Particle physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-24 18:12 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-26 11:18 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-26 15:34 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-27 12:57 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-28 10:04 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-28 10:29 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-29 13:04 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-30 13:08 -0700
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 13:08 +0200
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 13:23 +0200
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-01 12:10 -0700
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 21:50 +0200
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-01 14:56 -0700
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 08:23 +0200
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-02 11:18 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-02 15:09 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 15:53 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 14:31 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-07 11:01 -0700
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-08 15:14 -0700
Re: Particle physics Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 19:27 +0200
Re: Particle physics numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-10-09 11:39 -0700
Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13 Next page →
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 15:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55771da1-a0c9-49e0-807f-0d7e1bc3ed46@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391989 |
A muon is 200 times more massive than an electron and an electron cannot propagate through one inch thick steel plate so what make you think that a muon can propagate through this steel plate. Also, while your at it what is the purpose of the 27 km circumference CERN vacuum tube that the ostensible proton beam propagates in? To accelerate the proton beam?????
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 03:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nrfodp$5rq$5@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #392506 |
numbernumber1964@gmail.com writes: >A muon is 200 times more massive than an electron and an electron cannot >propagate through one inch thick steel plate so what make you think that >a muon can propagate through this steel plate. The increased mass of the muon makes it MORE penetrating. More mass means less deflection due to electric fields, which means less bremsstrahlung, which means less energy loss, which means it keeps on going.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 18:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <790498d5-1d80-49d7-86af-12dcb834c828@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391989 |
"You may be interested in this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_tomography This is technology using the high penetrative power of muons to look into heavily shielded nuclear reactor cores (including assessing the damage at Fukushima), look for nuclear material in cargo, look for hidden chambers in the Pyramids of Egypt, etc." Moroney. ___________________________________________________________ The Fukushima and Pyramid hidden chamber detections are based on thermodynamic variations.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-17 16:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3e314009-856a-4290-a192-669e683b1b28@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391989 |
The increased mass of the muon makes it MORE penetrating. More mass means less deflection due to electric fields, which means less bremsstrahlung, which means less energy loss, which means it keeps on going. _________________________________________________________________ Then why not just ignore the muons and state that protons propagate through the .25 thick steel plate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Moroney <moroney@TheWorld.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 03:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nrl0nm$i7o$4@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #392765 |
numbernumber1964@gmail.com writes: >The increased mass of the muon makes it MORE penetrating. More mass means >less deflection due to electric fields, which means less bremsstrahlung, >which means less energy loss, which means it keeps on going. >_________________________________________________________________ >Then why not just ignore the muons and state that protons propagate >through the .25 thick steel plate. Protons seem to be subject to something called the Bragg peak where once they slow to a certain energy, they lose all their energy almost all at once. They are using this effect in proton beam cancer treatment where proton beams lose almost all their energy in the tumor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 13:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9be2d814-a3b1-4515-8cc5-b12d5fe0f467@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391989 |
Protons seem to be subject to something called the Bragg peak where once they slow to a certain energy, they lose all their energy almost all at once. They are using this effect in proton beam cancer treatment where proton beams lose almost all their energy in the tumor. ___________________________________________________________ Come on you're comparing the penetration of human tissue with .25 inch thick steel plate. Are you just guessing? Give me a break! What are you going to use next----bigfoot or maybe UFO's...since your arguments are starting to sound like it...Your good friend ben-ben..
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 01:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nrndn1$jao$5@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #392849 |
numbernumber1964@gmail.com writes: >Protons seem to be subject to something called the Bragg peak where >once they slow to a certain energy, they lose all their energy almost >all at once. They are using this effect in proton beam cancer treatment >where proton beams lose almost all their energy in the tumor. >___________________________________________________________ >Come on you're comparing the penetration of human tissue with .25 inch >thick steel plate. Are you just guessing? Give me a break! What are you >going to use next----bigfoot or maybe UFO's...since your arguments are >starting to sound like it...Your good friend ben-ben.. This works for any material. 1/4" steel, cancer tissues, rock etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 17:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6b8d6eae-a7b8-4329-b8c9-539c415f6d49@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391989 |
While you're at it explain this_______ The CERN proton beam is said to be accelerated while propagating through the circular vacuum tunnel, that has a circumference of 27 km, but a magnet cannot accelerate the proton beam since a magnet's magnetic field can only change the direction of a propagating proton which proves particle physics is a hoax.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 14:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nrosii$p6k$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #392870 |
numbernumber1964@gmail.com writes: >The CERN proton beam is said to be accelerated while propagating through >the circular vacuum tunnel, that has a circumference of 27 km, but a >magnet cannot accelerate the proton beam since a magnet's magnetic field >can only change the direction of a propagating proton which proves >particle physics is a hoax. The purpose of the magnets at CERN is to force the protons to follow the curve of the tunnel rather than to fly off in a straight line, and to focus the beam. Electric fields accelerate the protons.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 11:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nrp3oj$1nj4$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #392938 |
On 9/19/2016 9:26 AM, Michael Moroney wrote: > numbernumber1964@gmail.com writes: > >> The CERN proton beam is said to be accelerated while propagating through >> the circular vacuum tunnel, that has a circumference of 27 km, but a >> magnet cannot accelerate the proton beam since a magnet's magnetic field >> can only change the direction of a propagating proton which proves >> particle physics is a hoax. You might want to learn how a synchrotron actually works. The part that actually speeds up the particles is an RF station at one point in the ring. The purpose of the magnets is simply to bend the path of those particles so that they'll hit the RF station over and over and over again. > > The purpose of the magnets at CERN is to force the protons to follow the > curve of the tunnel rather than to fly off in a straight line, and to > focus the beam. Electric fields accelerate the protons. > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 18:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a65050d6-b2bc-491f-8225-100b67c8eb2d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391989 |
So a proton and electron can propagate through 1/4" thick steel plate?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 15:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nrov9g$p6k$12@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #392878 |
numbernumber1964@gmail.com writes: >So a proton and electron can propagate through 1/4" thick steel plate? An electron loses energy rapidly because of its small mass allows deflection causing it to give off energy as bremsstrahlung. The proton loses energy rapidly once it reaches the Bragg peak. Also the proton interacts with nuclei via the strong force. The muon, on the other hand is more massive than the electron and therefore doesn't deflect much or lose energy to bremsstrahlung, nor does it interact via the strong force.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-18 18:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d0de1fb5-fbcc-46ec-9855-8a5f23b0063c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391989 |
"You may be interested in this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_tomography This is technology using the high penetrative power of muons to look into heavily shielded nuclear reactor cores (including assessing the damage at Fukushima), look for nuclear material in cargo, look for hidden chambers in the Pyramids of Egypt, etc." Moroney. ___________________________________________________________ The Fukushima and Pyramid hidden chamber detections are based on thermodynamic variations. Also, you forgot to explain you way out of this.!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 14:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nross7$p6k$4@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #392881 |
numbernumber1964@gmail.com writes: >"You may be interested in this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon_tomography >This is technology using the high penetrative power of muons to look into >heavily shielded nuclear reactor cores (including assessing the damage at >Fukushima), look for nuclear material in cargo, look for hidden chambers >in the Pyramids of Egypt, etc." Moroney. >___________________________________________________________ >The Fukushima and Pyramid hidden chamber detections are based on thermodynamic >variations. Also, you forgot to explain you way out of this.!! They are using/have used a variety of methods to look for hidden pyramid chambers and to clean up the mess at Fukushima. Muon tomography is just one. If they also used other methods, that does not disprove muon tomography. Did you even read the entry?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 15:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e8a06367-a8f7-4ef7-a87e-f09207cdd3c9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #391989 |
Then what is the purpose of the 27 circumference vacuum tube, good looks? Kind of expensive good look device? Particle physics is a hoax that has not produce a single useful physical result except scribble on paper.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-19 23:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnnu0u3c.fvi.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
| In reply to | #393006 |
numbernumber1964 wrote: > > Then what is the purpose of the 27 circumference vacuum tube, > good looks? Kind of expensive good look device? Particle > physics is a hoax that has not produce a single useful physical > result except scribble on paper. Not true. The physical results produced by colliders are the particles emerging from the collisions. Some of them are charged particles, and because they can therefore be detected, their momenta can be measured. We have veritable mountains of such data, and one day, perhaps, physicists will figure out a valid method of analysing them. Ned
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 08:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nrre2u$144k$9@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #393013 |
On 9/19/2016 6:44 PM, Ned Latham wrote: > numbernumber1964 wrote: >> >> Then what is the purpose of the 27 circumference vacuum tube, >> good looks? Kind of expensive good look device? Particle >> physics is a hoax that has not produce a single useful physical >> result except scribble on paper. > > Not true. The physical results produced by colliders are the > particles emerging from the collisions. Some of them are charged > particles, and because they can therefore be detected, their > momenta can be measured. > > We have veritable mountains of such data, and one day, perhaps, > physicists will figure out a valid method of analysing them. > > Ned > As though no valid methods of analyzing them exist today? How do you think the reconstructions at FNAL and LHC and other labs have been done? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-20 17:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnnu2to5.ecd.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
| In reply to | #393097 |
Odd Bodkin wrote: > Ned Latham wrote: > > numbernumber1964 wrote: > > > > > > Then what is the purpose of the 27 circumference vacuum tube, > > > good looks? Kind of expensive good look device? Particle > > > physics is a hoax that has not produce a single useful physical > > > result except scribble on paper. > > > > Not true. The physical results produced by colliders are the > > particles emerging from the collisions. Some of them are charged > > particles, and because they can therefore be detected, their > > momenta can be measured. > > > > We have veritable mountains of such data, and one day, perhaps, > > physicists will figure out a valid method of analysing them. > > As though no valid methods of analyzing them exist today? However did you manage to work that out, Slow Boy? > How do you think the reconstructions at FNAL and LHC and > other labs have been done? Path "reconstructions"? Is that the best you can do? Why aren't you rubbing my face in their use to confirm variable mass? Ned
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 13:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ns18lu$4sl$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #393122 |
On 9/20/2016 12:51 PM, Ned Latham wrote: > Odd Bodkin wrote: >> Ned Latham wrote: >>> numbernumber1964 wrote: >>>> >>>> Then what is the purpose of the 27 circumference vacuum tube, >>>> good looks? Kind of expensive good look device? Particle >>>> physics is a hoax that has not produce a single useful physical >>>> result except scribble on paper. >>> >>> Not true. The physical results produced by colliders are the >>> particles emerging from the collisions. Some of them are charged >>> particles, and because they can therefore be detected, their >>> momenta can be measured. >>> >>> We have veritable mountains of such data, and one day, perhaps, >>> physicists will figure out a valid method of analysing them. >> >> As though no valid methods of analyzing them exist today? > > However did you manage to work that out, Slow Boy? If that's your claim, then unfortunately all you've demonstrated is that you don't have the slightest idea what you're talking aobut. > >> How do you think the reconstructions at FNAL and LHC and >> other labs have been done? > > Path "reconstructions"? Is that the best you can do? Why aren't > you rubbing my face in their use to confirm variable mass? I have no interest in rubbing your face in anything. Either you know something about how this is done or you don't. If you don't and you want to fix that, then I can certainly recommend some good reading materials that will teach you how it's done. You attempting to bait me to "rub your face in it" to teach you here is a ridiculous and futile tactic. > > Ned > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-22 21:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnnu8kp2.s5q.nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> |
| In reply to | #393373 |
Odd Bodkin wrote: > Ned Latham wrote: > > Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > Ned Latham wrote: > > > > numbernumber1964 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Then what is the purpose of the 27 circumference vacuum tube, > > > > > good looks? Kind of expensive good look device? Particle > > > > > physics is a hoax that has not produce a single useful physical > > > > > result except scribble on paper. > > > > > > > > Not true. The physical results produced by colliders are the > > > > particles emerging from the collisions. Some of them are charged > > > > particles, and because they can therefore be detected, their > > > > momenta can be measured. > > > > > > > > We have veritable mountains of such data, and one day, perhaps, > > > > physicists will figure out a valid method of analysing them. > > > > > > As though no valid methods of analyzing them exist today? > > > > However did you manage to work that out, Slow Boy? > > If that's your claim, then unfortunately all you've demonstrated is > that you don't have the slightest idea what you're talking aobut. You wish. Fact is, Slow Boy, it's you who don't know what I'm talking about. > > > How do you think the reconstructions at FNAL and LHC and > > > other labs have been done? > > > > Path "reconstructions"? Is that the best you can do? Why aren't > > you rubbing my face in their use to confirm variable mass? > > I have no interest in rubbing your face in anything. Either you > know something about how this is done or you don't. Oh, I know how physicists and their gulls *think* it's done; speed and mass values are calculated from the observed momenta, the calculations are deemed valid, and as a consequence the results are deemed confirmations of the postulate. Simple, really. < If you don't and you want to fix that, then I can certainly > recommend some good reading materials that will teach you how > it's done. Gee. Thank you *so* much. > You That's "your", Slow Boy. > attempting to bait me to "rub your face in it" to teach > you here is a ridiculous and futile tactic. Not to teach *me*, Slow Boy: to teach you. And not *what* to think, but *how* to think. But then, there's some doubt as to whether you'd get it. Ned
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web