Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #389317 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-06 09:24 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-08-22 06:06 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 306 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-06 09:24 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 16:09 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-06 14:40 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 17:29 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-07 06:29 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 13:21 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-09 05:49 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 08:14 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-10 05:56 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 08:59 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-10 08:30 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 10:58 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 09:14 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 11:48 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 10:27 -0700
Stephane Baune fraud eats shit "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-08-10 10:30 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune fraud eats shit rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 14:00 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune fraud eats shit "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-08-10 22:37 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune fraud eats shit rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 07:13 -0700
Re: Stephane Baune fraud eats shit "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-08-21 14:04 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Larry Harson <johnmcandrew66@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 13:23 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 15:58 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-10 21:42 +0000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 16:50 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-11 07:19 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 09:48 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-11 15:58 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 19:13 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-12 06:06 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 19:24 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-12 06:17 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 08:29 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-12 06:46 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 10:47 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-13 06:16 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 11:46 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Larry Harson <johnmcandrew66@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 11:30 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-13 07:36 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 08:16 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-10 21:21 +0000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 16:46 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-10 14:31 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 16:48 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-11 07:14 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 09:52 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-11 15:48 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 19:11 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-07 06:39 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 13:22 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-06 21:54 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-07 06:27 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 08:38 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-07 23:12 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 10:07 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-08 23:12 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-07 09:52 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 13:28 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-08 06:40 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-08 07:14 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-08 22:58 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 16:42 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-09 08:29 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-09 04:37 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-09 23:47 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-09 15:32 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 08:27 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-10 19:48 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 13:17 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-10 21:34 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 16:06 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-11 06:01 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-16 23:23 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 14:48 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-08-17 08:07 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 17:33 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-19 02:45 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 07:30 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-21 07:12 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 17:41 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-22 06:02 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-08-21 21:47 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 08:47 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-22 23:47 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 15:04 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-17 06:56 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-18 08:04 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 13:51 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-19 06:30 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-18 16:55 -0400
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-20 08:29 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-20 06:12 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-21 08:59 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-21 06:51 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-21 19:19 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-21 04:35 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-22 06:34 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-21 22:50 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-23 06:14 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-23 22:38 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-24 11:19 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-24 07:37 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-25 04:23 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-25 04:26 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-25 22:14 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-27 08:29 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-27 10:01 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 05:36 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-29 03:55 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 20:24 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-30 21:34 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 06:46 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-31 09:17 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-01 19:51 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-01 18:26 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-02 11:50 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-01 21:04 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-03 09:07 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-03 07:05 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-04 07:52 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-04 05:20 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-05 09:20 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-05 22:04 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-06 09:22 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-09-05 20:34 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-06 07:15 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-07 05:23 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-06 22:15 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-09-08 13:07 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-08 22:24 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-09-09 08:43 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-09 06:53 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 07:28 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-10 01:07 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-11 00:08 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-09 06:50 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-10 06:16 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-09 19:21 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-09-10 13:23 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-10 03:58 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-12 07:39 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-12 06:11 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-25 07:55 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 17:59 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-22 03:35 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-23 06:19 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 17:42 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 17:38 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 16:37 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 17:33 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 18:42 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-19 07:45 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 07:12 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-16 23:13 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-28 20:40 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-28 11:55 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 05:18 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 17:05 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-29 04:08 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 22:15 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-30 08:38 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 05:43 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-30 22:21 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 06:38 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-31 09:34 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-01 19:43 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 00:15 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-07 07:21 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 13:24 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-09 06:08 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 08:15 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-10 05:59 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 09:00 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 09:51 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 12:18 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 11:37 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 19:33 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 13:16 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 06:04 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-16 03:40 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 17:33 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-08-12 19:19 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 06:45 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-13 23:14 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-08-15 13:58 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-13 15:44 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-08-14 12:25 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 16:44 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS astrofoton@interia.pl - 2016-08-14 18:04 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-08-14 23:25 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 08:52 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-15 10:25 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 12:31 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-08-15 22:04 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Python <python@org.invalid> - 2016-08-16 12:25 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-16 06:10 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 12:09 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 13:11 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 14:57 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 15:16 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-19 12:38 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-19 19:41 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-16 16:50 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 13:53 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-18 16:50 -0400
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 16:38 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-18 23:39 -0400
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 07:39 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 13:27 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-08-15 12:57 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS astrofoton@interia.pl - 2016-08-16 08:28 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-14 22:05 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-08-15 00:05 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-08-16 09:12 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-16 10:10 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-08-17 08:45 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-17 13:59 +0000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-08-17 17:19 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-18 08:24 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-08-18 06:20 +0000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-18 15:06 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-19 06:58 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-18 20:12 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-19 18:19 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-20 08:38 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-20 12:57 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-21 09:10 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-21 06:23 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-21 21:28 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-22 06:44 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-22 20:58 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-23 06:29 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 14:08 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-08-23 08:35 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 06:13 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-22 23:44 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-08-23 08:49 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-23 19:07 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-24 06:57 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 04:51 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-24 05:23 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 06:15 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-26 06:06 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 15:28 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-27 08:34 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-24 20:23 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-26 06:40 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 14:11 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-25 23:43 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-27 08:38 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 16:15 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-29 05:11 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-29 15:46 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-30 05:14 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-29 17:47 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-31 20:52 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 21:49 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-09-01 06:32 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-02 08:49 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 16:24 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-01 20:44 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 03:20 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 07:24 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-04 07:55 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 15:11 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-05 08:43 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-03 09:22 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-01 20:21 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-01 13:30 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-09-03 19:29 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-09-03 06:42 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-04 18:51 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 03:19 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-05 09:25 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-09-05 08:48 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-06 09:25 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 08:33 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-09-05 09:29 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-05 04:54 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-30 22:13 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-31 06:54 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-31 09:31 +0200
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-09-03 11:11 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-23 04:36 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-23 18:55 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-25 04:43 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 07:10 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-23 07:43 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-24 07:00 +1000
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-16 10:40 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS astrofoton@interia.pl - 2016-08-16 11:20 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 17:54 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-08-18 06:22 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-13 06:45 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 11:41 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 12:21 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-19 12:24 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 12:40 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 12:58 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-22 13:45 -0500
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 13:27 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 16:59 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-08-13 06:27 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-16 13:01 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-08-21 14:09 -0700
Re: Tom Roberts' Proposed Experiments to Detect RoS Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 04:16 -0700
Ignorant Raving Crackpot back to what he does best: shit eating "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-08-22 06:06 -0700
Page 2 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 16 Next page →
| From | Larry Harson <johnmcandrew66@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-10 13:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e766c65e-64d1-4d44-97cc-a14144c67470@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #389721 |
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 5:48:27 PM UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 8/10/2016 11:14 AM, rotchm wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 11:58:16 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 8/10/2016 10:30 AM, kenseto wrote: > > > >> Yes of course the time travel will be the same. But what's being tested > >> is that the time of origination of the signals from the ends will NOT be > >> the same in the rod frame. So of course if the start times are different > >> in the rod frame, and the time of travel is the same, then the time of > >> arrival will be different in the rod frame. > >> > >> You didn't understand the point of the experiment? > > > > Dont you find that he is a mirror image of idiot dono!? Something fishy going on... > > > Dono is not senile. Ken is as useful as a pile of 1954 Akron telephone > books and as dumb as half a bale of cotton. Dono at least has not spent > money on TWO editions of a failed self-published book, as far as I know. How did he fail? I have to give him credit for sitting down and putting in a book his ideas, which has managed to sell on Amazon.com with 10 used available: https://www.amazon.com/Model-mechanics-new-interpretation-nature/dp/0964713608 Whether those used copies come from the same person, I can't say :) LH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-10 15:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nog4hh$16s3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #389736 |
On 8/10/2016 3:23 PM, Larry Harson wrote: > On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 5:48:27 PM UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> Dono is not senile. Ken is as useful as a pile of 1954 Akron telephone >> books and as dumb as half a bale of cotton. Dono at least has not spent >> money on TWO editions of a failed self-published book, as far as I know. > > How did he fail? > > I have to give him credit for sitting down and putting in a book his ideas, which has > managed to sell on Amazon.com with 10 used available: > > https://www.amazon.com/Model-mechanics-new-interpretation-nature/dp/0964713608 > > Whether those used copies come from the same person, I can't say :) > > LH > > If you spend a few thousand dollars publishing a book, and you get sales of five copies at $6 apiece, would you consider it something other than a failure? I suppose if you have invented a better toilet brush, and you have invested a few thousand dollars and made $30 in revenue from your invention, you could always say you put your ideas into a real product, even if it's one that nobody wanted and consumed your savings. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-10 21:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nog74i$3b2$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #389742 |
Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> writes: >If you spend a few thousand dollars publishing a book, and you get sales >of five copies at $6 apiece, would you consider it something other than >a failure? I wonder what the actual cost (and minimum run) is/was for self-published books? I think these days there are print-on-demand books which would be much less, so I suspect there will be more kookbooks available soon..
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-10 16:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nog7il$1b82$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #389749 |
On 8/10/2016 4:42 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> writes: > >> If you spend a few thousand dollars publishing a book, and you get sales >> of five copies at $6 apiece, would you consider it something other than >> a failure? > > I wonder what the actual cost (and minimum run) is/was for self-published > books? I think these days there are print-on-demand books which would be > much less, so I suspect there will be more kookbooks available soon.. > I did a little research on this about a month or so ago. You save a little if you publish only in ebook format, which is what McGinn did, but not in print like Ken did. I don't think Ken is clever enough to find the ways to save money. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-11 07:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <13b1d5dc-6ff0-44f9-9ed5-558ead850418@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #389753 |
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 5:50:17 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 8/10/2016 4:42 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> If you spend a few thousand dollars publishing a book, and you get sales > >> of five copies at $6 apiece, would you consider it something other than > >> a failure? > > > > I wonder what the actual cost (and minimum run) is/was for self-published > > books? I think these days there are print-on-demand books which would be > > much less, so I suspect there will be more kookbooks available soon.. > > > > I did a little research on this about a month or so ago. You save a > little if you publish only in ebook format, which is what McGinn did, > but not in print like Ken did. I don't think Ken is clever enough to > find the ways to save money. I tried to publish in ebook form but the equations and diagrams do not show up correctly. I got an ebook in pdf format but amazon will not accept such format.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-11 09:48 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <noi37h$1pa9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #389785 |
On 8/11/2016 9:19 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 5:50:17 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 8/10/2016 4:42 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: >>> Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> If you spend a few thousand dollars publishing a book, and you get sales >>>> of five copies at $6 apiece, would you consider it something other than >>>> a failure? >>> >>> I wonder what the actual cost (and minimum run) is/was for self-published >>> books? I think these days there are print-on-demand books which would be >>> much less, so I suspect there will be more kookbooks available soon.. >>> >> >> I did a little research on this about a month or so ago. You save a >> little if you publish only in ebook format, which is what McGinn did, >> but not in print like Ken did. I don't think Ken is clever enough to >> find the ways to save money. > > I tried to publish in ebook form but the equations and diagrams do not show up > correctly. I got an ebook in pdf format but amazon will not accept such format. > I think you just haven't figured out how to publish an ebook without breaking the equations and diagrams. There are plenty of epub-format files that have embedded equations and diagrams and they are on my Kindle. But if you don't want to pay anyone a consulting fee to do this work or teach you how to do it, so that you would not spend thousands of dollars on self-publishing a print book but instead only hundreds in publishing an ebook, I suppose it's your money to throw away. How much have you invested over the years on your books, Ken, and how much revenue have you earned? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-11 15:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1c0e0cfe-74a5-4439-ba32-eb9e530ceae8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #389787 |
On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 10:48:20 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 8/11/2016 9:19 AM, kenseto wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 5:50:17 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 8/10/2016 4:42 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > >>> Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> writes: > >>> > >>>> If you spend a few thousand dollars publishing a book, and you get sales > >>>> of five copies at $6 apiece, would you consider it something other than > >>>> a failure? > >>> > >>> I wonder what the actual cost (and minimum run) is/was for self-published > >>> books? I think these days there are print-on-demand books which would be > >>> much less, so I suspect there will be more kookbooks available soon.. > >>> > >> > >> I did a little research on this about a month or so ago. You save a > >> little if you publish only in ebook format, which is what McGinn did, > >> but not in print like Ken did. I don't think Ken is clever enough to > >> find the ways to save money. > > > > I tried to publish in ebook form but the equations and diagrams do not show up > > correctly. I got an ebook in pdf format but amazon will not accept such format. > > > > I think you just haven't figured out how to publish an ebook without > breaking the equations and diagrams. There are plenty of epub-format > files that have embedded equations and diagrams and they are on my Kindle. I know....but I don't have the time to learn how right now. > > But if you don't want to pay anyone a consulting fee to do this work or > teach you how to do it, so that you would not spend thousands of dollars > on self-publishing a print book but instead only hundreds in publishing > an ebook, I suppose it's your money to throw away. I wanted a printed book in the library of Congress. > > How much have you invested over the years on your books, Ken, and how > much revenue have you earned? None of your business. > > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-11 19:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <noj4bg$1bo4$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #389803 |
On 8/11/2016 5:58 PM, kenseto wrote: > On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 10:48:20 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 8/11/2016 9:19 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 5:50:17 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 8/10/2016 4:42 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>> Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> If you spend a few thousand dollars publishing a book, and you get sales >>>>>> of five copies at $6 apiece, would you consider it something other than >>>>>> a failure? >>>>> >>>>> I wonder what the actual cost (and minimum run) is/was for self-published >>>>> books? I think these days there are print-on-demand books which would be >>>>> much less, so I suspect there will be more kookbooks available soon.. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I did a little research on this about a month or so ago. You save a >>>> little if you publish only in ebook format, which is what McGinn did, >>>> but not in print like Ken did. I don't think Ken is clever enough to >>>> find the ways to save money. >>> >>> I tried to publish in ebook form but the equations and diagrams do not show up >>> correctly. I got an ebook in pdf format but amazon will not accept such format. >>> >> >> I think you just haven't figured out how to publish an ebook without >> breaking the equations and diagrams. There are plenty of epub-format >> files that have embedded equations and diagrams and they are on my Kindle. > > I know....but I don't have the time to learn how right now. I just learned last week. Took two hours. >> >> But if you don't want to pay anyone a consulting fee to do this work or >> teach you how to do it, so that you would not spend thousands of dollars >> on self-publishing a print book but instead only hundreds in publishing >> an ebook, I suppose it's your money to throw away. > > I wanted a printed book in the library of Congress. And is your book in the Library of Congress holdings? >> >> How much have you invested over the years on your books, Ken, and how >> much revenue have you earned? > > None of your business. That bad, huh? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-12 06:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3621fd8c-6783-4f3f-b4cc-fdbd179b6ee6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #389809 |
On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 8:13:40 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 8/11/2016 5:58 PM, kenseto wrote: > > On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 10:48:20 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 8/11/2016 9:19 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 5:50:17 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> On 8/10/2016 4:42 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > >>>>> Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> writes: > >>>>> > >>>>>> If you spend a few thousand dollars publishing a book, and you get sales > >>>>>> of five copies at $6 apiece, would you consider it something other than > >>>>>> a failure? > >>>>> > >>>>> I wonder what the actual cost (and minimum run) is/was for self-published > >>>>> books? I think these days there are print-on-demand books which would be > >>>>> much less, so I suspect there will be more kookbooks available soon.. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I did a little research on this about a month or so ago. You save a > >>>> little if you publish only in ebook format, which is what McGinn did, > >>>> but not in print like Ken did. I don't think Ken is clever enough to > >>>> find the ways to save money. > >>> > >>> I tried to publish in ebook form but the equations and diagrams do not show up > >>> correctly. I got an ebook in pdf format but amazon will not accept such format. > >>> > >> > >> I think you just haven't figured out how to publish an ebook without > >> breaking the equations and diagrams. There are plenty of epub-format > >> files that have embedded equations and diagrams and they are on my Kindle. > > > > I know....but I don't have the time to learn how right now. > > I just learned last week. Took two hours. Good for you....but I am not a fast learner....I still type with two fingers and have to look at the key board while typing. > > >> > >> But if you don't want to pay anyone a consulting fee to do this work or > >> teach you how to do it, so that you would not spend thousands of dollars > >> on self-publishing a print book but instead only hundreds in publishing > >> an ebook, I suppose it's your money to throw away. > > > > I wanted a printed book in the library of Congress. > > And is your book in the Library of Congress holdings? The copy right office told me that it will be in a few months. > > >> > >> How much have you invested over the years on your books, Ken, and how > >> much revenue have you earned? > > > > None of your business. > > That bad, huh? > > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-11 19:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <noj4vt$1cqi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #389803 |
On 8/11/2016 5:58 PM, kenseto wrote: >> But if you don't want to pay anyone a consulting fee to do this work or >> > teach you how to do it, so that you would not spend thousands of dollars >> > on self-publishing a print book but instead only hundreds in publishing >> > an ebook, I suppose it's your money to throw away. > I wanted a printed book in the library of Congress. >> > I see the 1995 book is in fact in the Library of Congress. The 2016 book is not. Congratulations for being one of 24 million books there. You may want to know that the LoC also has a large number of digital files in its holdings, including PDFs. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-12 06:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <24b879f1-fdd8-427b-811b-ca9f07a38fa0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #389811 |
On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 8:24:34 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 8/11/2016 5:58 PM, kenseto wrote: > >> But if you don't want to pay anyone a consulting fee to do this work or > >> > teach you how to do it, so that you would not spend thousands of dollars > >> > on self-publishing a print book but instead only hundreds in publishing > >> > an ebook, I suppose it's your money to throw away. > > I wanted a printed book in the library of Congress. > >> > > > I see the 1995 book is in fact in the Library of Congress. The 2016 book > is not. Congratulations for being one of 24 million books there. > > You may want to know that the LoC also has a large number of digital > files in its holdings, including PDFs. The problem is: I won't get any benefit from such PDF filing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-12 08:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nokiut$1ct2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #389845 |
On 8/12/2016 8:17 AM, kenseto wrote: >> I see the 1995 book is in fact in the Library of Congress. The 2016 book >> > is not. Congratulations for being one of 24 million books there. >> > >> > You may want to know that the LoC also has a large number of digital >> > files in its holdings, including PDFs. > The problem is: I won't get any benefit from such PDF filing. So here's the choice: 1. Spend thousands to generate a print book, which you can sell on Amazon, but which doesn't sell well, and so your financial loss is great. 2. Spend a hundred or two to generate a PDF, which you cannot sell on Amazon, and so your loss is guaranteed but it is much smaller. Either route you will get a catalog entry in the LoC. So what's important to you? Getting into the LoC, or managing your loss risk? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-12 06:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a43afebc-74c2-4c05-9bf6-4d02e70f51a2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #389846 |
On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 9:29:04 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 8/12/2016 8:17 AM, kenseto wrote: > >> I see the 1995 book is in fact in the Library of Congress. The 2016 book > >> > is not. Congratulations for being one of 24 million books there. > >> > > >> > You may want to know that the LoC also has a large number of digital > >> > files in its holdings, including PDFs. > > The problem is: I won't get any benefit from such PDF filing. > > So here's the choice: > 1. Spend thousands to generate a print book, which you can sell on > Amazon, but which doesn't sell well, and so your financial loss is great. > 2. Spend a hundred or two to generate a PDF, which you cannot sell on > Amazon, and so your loss is guaranteed but it is much smaller. Idiot.....the book is already printed. > > Either route you will get a catalog entry in the LoC. > > So what's important to you? Getting into the LoC, or managing your loss > risk? > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-12 10:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nokr1u$1qem$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #389848 |
On 8/12/2016 8:46 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 9:29:04 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 8/12/2016 8:17 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>> I see the 1995 book is in fact in the Library of Congress. The 2016 book >>>>> is not. Congratulations for being one of 24 million books there. >>>>> >>>>> You may want to know that the LoC also has a large number of digital >>>>> files in its holdings, including PDFs. >>> The problem is: I won't get any benefit from such PDF filing. >> >> So here's the choice: >> 1. Spend thousands to generate a print book, which you can sell on >> Amazon, but which doesn't sell well, and so your financial loss is great. >> 2. Spend a hundred or two to generate a PDF, which you cannot sell on >> Amazon, and so your loss is guaranteed but it is much smaller. > > Idiot.....the book is already printed. Yes, I know. The question is whether you made a sound choice or not. It's also about whether you're going to make the same choice AGAIN, investing thousands to produce another print book that will earn virtually nothing in sales. The fact that you have made this mistake three times now, does not mean that you should make it four times. > >> >> Either route you will get a catalog entry in the LoC. >> >> So what's important to you? Getting into the LoC, or managing your loss >> risk? >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-13 06:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d82bcfcc-5dba-493b-b23d-3fc0b783cd49@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #389855 |
On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 11:47:13 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 8/12/2016 8:46 AM, kenseto wrote: > > On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 9:29:04 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 8/12/2016 8:17 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>>> I see the 1995 book is in fact in the Library of Congress. The 2016 book > >>>>> is not. Congratulations for being one of 24 million books there. > >>>>> > >>>>> You may want to know that the LoC also has a large number of digital > >>>>> files in its holdings, including PDFs. > >>> The problem is: I won't get any benefit from such PDF filing. > >> > >> So here's the choice: > >> 1. Spend thousands to generate a print book, which you can sell on > >> Amazon, but which doesn't sell well, and so your financial loss is great. > >> 2. Spend a hundred or two to generate a PDF, which you cannot sell on > >> Amazon, and so your loss is guaranteed but it is much smaller. > > > > Idiot.....the book is already printed. > > Yes, I know. The question is whether you made a sound choice or not. > It's also about whether you're going to make the same choice AGAIN, > investing thousands to produce another print book that will earn > virtually nothing in sales. To ME it is a sound choice. In any case it is irrelevant.....I am spending my own money so why does it bother you so much? > > The fact that you have made this mistake three times now, does not mean > that you should make it four times.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-13 11:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nonitq$1kg7$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #389915 |
On 8/13/2016 8:16 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 11:47:13 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 8/12/2016 8:46 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 9:29:04 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 8/12/2016 8:17 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>> I see the 1995 book is in fact in the Library of Congress. The 2016 book >>>>>>> is not. Congratulations for being one of 24 million books there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You may want to know that the LoC also has a large number of digital >>>>>>> files in its holdings, including PDFs. >>>>> The problem is: I won't get any benefit from such PDF filing. >>>> >>>> So here's the choice: >>>> 1. Spend thousands to generate a print book, which you can sell on >>>> Amazon, but which doesn't sell well, and so your financial loss is great. >>>> 2. Spend a hundred or two to generate a PDF, which you cannot sell on >>>> Amazon, and so your loss is guaranteed but it is much smaller. >>> >>> Idiot.....the book is already printed. >> >> Yes, I know. The question is whether you made a sound choice or not. >> It's also about whether you're going to make the same choice AGAIN, >> investing thousands to produce another print book that will earn >> virtually nothing in sales. > > To ME it is a sound choice. In any case it is irrelevant.....I am spending > my own money so why does it bother you so much? Oh, it doesn't bother me at all. It's your money, not mine. Whether it's sound or not, to me depends on results not ambitions. You have ambitions of making your money back, you say. How are the results? >> >> The fact that you have made this mistake three times now, does not mean >> that you should make it four times. > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Larry Harson <johnmcandrew66@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-12 11:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <74499eb5-4f21-456f-a000-92d5d37904e5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #389742 |
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 9:58:28 PM UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 8/10/2016 3:23 PM, Larry Harson wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 5:48:27 PM UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > >> Dono is not senile. Ken is as useful as a pile of 1954 Akron telephone > >> books and as dumb as half a bale of cotton. Dono at least has not spent > >> money on TWO editions of a failed self-published book, as far as I know. > > > > How did he fail? > > > > I have to give him credit for sitting down and putting in a book his ideas, which has > > managed to sell on Amazon.com with 10 used available: > > > > https://www.amazon.com/Model-mechanics-new-interpretation-nature/dp/0964713608 > > > > Whether those used copies come from the same person, I can't say :) > > > > LH > > > > > If you spend a few thousand dollars publishing a book, and you get sales > of five copies at $6 apiece, would you consider it something other than > a failure? People have their differing reasons for publishing. Not everyone publishes something for the sole purpose of making a profit. They may do it for the pleasure of seeing their ideas in print. > I suppose if you have invented a better toilet brush, and you have > invested a few thousand dollars and made $30 in revenue from your > invention, you could always say you put your ideas into a real product, > even if it's one that nobody wanted and consumed your savings. But in the process of trying to create something unlike most people, they've succeeded in developing new skills, met new people, experienced new experiences, helped people live their lives by employing their services... there's many sides to what people do. Upon retiring, most resort to moping around the house looking for something useful to do with the rest of their life. Ken decided to take up criticizing relativity, publishing his own book so people can read about his ideas, even if the informed see them as naive and ill informed. The same thing on a far more sophisticated level is going on with Tom and his experiment. One person is ridiculing Tom's proposed experiment as a failure; most are jumping to Tom's defense and can see the value in what he's doing and so can I. People's endeavours aren't quite 100% either success or failure from one another's viewpoint. LH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-13 07:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ae187811-cda5-4cd2-90e5-c266dd1740a9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #389859 |
On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 2:30:45 PM UTC-4, Larry Harson wrote: > On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 9:58:28 PM UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > On 8/10/2016 3:23 PM, Larry Harson wrote: > > > On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 5:48:27 PM UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > > > > >> Dono is not senile. Ken is as useful as a pile of 1954 Akron telephone > > >> books and as dumb as half a bale of cotton. Dono at least has not spent > > >> money on TWO editions of a failed self-published book, as far as I know. > > > > > > How did he fail? > > > > > > I have to give him credit for sitting down and putting in a book his ideas, which has > > > managed to sell on Amazon.com with 10 used available: > > > > > > https://www.amazon.com/Model-mechanics-new-interpretation-nature/dp/0964713608 > > > > > > Whether those used copies come from the same person, I can't say :) > > > > > > LH > > > > > > > > > If you spend a few thousand dollars publishing a book, and you get sales > > of five copies at $6 apiece, would you consider it something other than > > a failure? > > People have their differing reasons for publishing. Not everyone publishes something for the sole purpose of making a profit. They may do it for the pleasure of seeing their ideas in print. > > > I suppose if you have invented a better toilet brush, and you have > > invested a few thousand dollars and made $30 in revenue from your > > invention, you could always say you put your ideas into a real product, > > even if it's one that nobody wanted and consumed your savings. > > But in the process of trying to create something unlike most people, they've succeeded in developing new skills, met new people, experienced new experiences, helped people live their lives by employing their services... there's many sides to what people do. Upon retiring, most resort to moping around the house looking for something useful to do with the rest of their life. Ken decided to take up criticizing relativity, publishing his own book so people can read about his ideas, even if the informed see them as naive and ill informed. NO......I did not published my book to criticize relativity. My theory IRT includes SR and LET as subsets. What this mean is that SR and LET are incomplete theories....the incompleteness is the result that each SR or LET observer considers himself to be in a state of absolute rest and therefore he has only one set of transform equations to predict the rate of a clock moving wrt him. An IRT observer does not consider himself to be in a state of absolute rest but he does not know if the observed clock is in a higher or lower state of absolute motion. Therefore he has two sets of transformation equations: one set to predict the moving clock is accumulating clock seconds at a higher rate and the other set to predict the moving clock is accumulating clock seconds at a lower rate. > > The same thing on a far more sophisticated level is going on with Tom and his experiment. One person is ridiculing Tom's proposed experiment as a failure; most are jumping to Tom's defense and can see the value in what he's doing and so can I. People's endeavours aren't quite 100% either suction and therefore he ccess or failure from one another's viewpoint. > > LH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-13 08:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <18b896e0-393a-4700-8594-588ed355fdc3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #389920 |
On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 10:36:17 AM UTC-4, kenseto wrote: > NO......I did not published my book to criticize relativity. My > theory IRT includes SR and LET as subsets. What this <snip> I have noticed a dramatic change in "ken's" writing style of the past few days. Its a great improvement & too great. So either he's being spoofed (thus, word of caution), or he is on stronger/better meds. Since the "real" ken has not manifested foul play, this lends us to believe that its actually ken! Ken, can you confirm that you are on new meds or treatment? And if so, which one(s)?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-10 21:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nog5th$alb$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #389721 |
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 5:48:27 PM UTC+1, Odd Bodkin wrote: > Dono is not senile. Ken is as useful as a pile of 1954 Akron telephone > books and as dumb as half a bale of cotton. Dono at least has not spent > money on TWO editions of a failed self-published book, as far as I know. Ken has at least one other self-published book out there. "The Physics of Absolute Motion (A New Theory of Everything)", 1998. No idea whether it's really the same as "Model Mechanics", but the same sock-puppet gave both a 5 star rating.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web