Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #388013 > unrolled thread
| Started by | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-18 23:29 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-07-27 21:40 +0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 101 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
A day will come mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-18 23:29 -0700
Re: A day will come mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-18 23:36 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-19 00:52 -0700
Re: A day will come mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-19 02:50 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-19 03:47 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 14:36 -0700
Re: A day will come mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-19 23:03 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 23:19 -0700
Re: A day will come mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-20 00:55 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 11:24 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-20 11:28 -0700
Re: A day will come mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-20 23:14 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 23:46 -0700
Re: A day will come mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-20 23:50 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 11:21 -0700
Re: A day will come Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-21 22:48 +0200
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 16:14 -0700
Re: A day will come mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-21 23:16 -0700
Re: A day will come moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-22 14:17 +0000
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 12:47 -0700
Re: A day will come Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-22 21:50 +0200
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 14:22 -0700
Re: A day will come Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-22 23:54 +0200
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 16:29 -0700
Re: A day will come Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-23 15:11 +0200
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-23 09:33 -0700
Re: A day will come Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 11:36 -0500
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-23 11:52 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 19:15 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-20 02:50 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-20 02:54 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-20 03:54 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-20 05:42 -0700
Re: A day will come mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-20 05:50 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-20 07:00 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-20 07:16 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 12:05 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 11:57 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-20 12:41 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 13:52 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-20 20:30 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 20:48 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-21 08:35 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 00:38 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-22 08:05 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 14:24 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-26 00:36 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 09:46 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-26 10:21 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 12:56 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-26 23:59 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 11:07 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-27 11:26 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 12:10 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-28 08:40 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 14:22 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-29 07:55 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 08:34 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-05 02:27 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 09:49 -0700
Re: A day will come Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 14:29 -0500
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-29 07:47 -0700
Re: A day will come Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 10:50 -0500
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-05 02:26 -0700
Re: A day will come green <green@greenvery.org> - 2016-07-22 18:18 +0000
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-22 11:53 -0700
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 14:25 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-26 00:39 -0700
Re: A day will come nero <oldogf@yahoo.it> - 2016-07-24 02:11 -0700
Re: A day will come Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-24 13:09 +0200
Re: A day will come paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 07:20 -0700
Re: A day will come Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-24 17:00 +0200
Re: A day will come JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 13:38 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-24 07:56 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-24 11:08 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-24 11:55 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-24 15:38 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-25 10:29 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-25 15:42 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-26 00:30 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-26 04:50 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-26 05:20 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-26 07:27 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-26 07:59 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-26 11:12 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-27 00:04 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-27 06:24 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-27 10:05 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-27 12:18 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-28 08:46 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-28 09:48 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-29 07:51 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-29 08:35 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-05 02:31 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-05 06:31 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-05 07:01 -0700
Re: A day will come Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-05 08:40 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-24 11:58 -0700
Re: A day will come David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-24 12:01 -0700
Re: A day will come Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-24 15:02 -0500
Write down your name now "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 21:40 +0800
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-28 14:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nndmfk$1231$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #388527 |
On 7/27/2016 1:26 PM, David Waite wrote: > Damn you're slow in the head. What part of, you lied you're done, are you not understanding? You don't think that desperately trying to have the last word in a conversation, where that last word is "This conversation is OVER", is a bad sign for you, David? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-29 07:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <189a4aa8-6106-44e4-babe-35a8ffa6f5d6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388616 |
On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 12:29:59 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/27/2016 1:26 PM, David Waite wrote: > > Damn you're slow in the head. What part of, you lied you're done, are you not understanding? > > You don't think that desperately trying to have the last word in a > conversation, where that last word is "This conversation is OVER", is a > bad sign for you, David? > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables You're not important.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-29 10:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nnftvp$17t$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #388672 |
On 7/29/2016 9:47 AM, David Waite wrote: > On Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 12:29:59 PM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 7/27/2016 1:26 PM, David Waite wrote: >>> Damn you're slow in the head. What part of, you lied you're done, are you not understanding? >> >> You don't think that desperately trying to have the last word in a >> conversation, where that last word is "This conversation is OVER", is a >> bad sign for you, David? >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > You're not important. > Wasn't trying to claim to be important, David. I was asking you a question. If there is something you need to do for yourself to not address the question, that's up to you. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-05 02:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <966f11a2-dc15-4f64-b294-22e9ad10f472@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388685 |
No you weren't. You were trolling.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | green <green@greenvery.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-22 18:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmto1n$ush$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #388134 |
David Waite wrote:
>> I don't see anything there addressing Low's argument besides
>
> Sure you did, but you're a lying fvcking scumbag for whom this topic is
> well over your idiot masses layman head. If it weren't over your head
> you would have taken me up on the challenge where I explicitly told you
> how you could prove me wrong:
> At https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igyujM_HSj0 I claim that for α, β, κ
> constants β≠–1 κ≠0,2 ds²=[exp(2αz/c²)][dct²-(dz+
> βdct)²]-{exp[(1±√(1+2κ-κ²))(1+β)α(z+(β-1)ct)/c²]}dx²-{exp[κ(1+β)α(z+(β-1)ct)/c²]}dy²
Not even is a partial differential equation. Give me a break. Give me tensors.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-22 11:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9e578337-6533-4852-b7c6-1e9e96fa3ed5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388191 |
On Friday, July 22, 2016 at 11:18:35 AM UTC-7, green wrote:
> David Waite wrote:
>
> >> I don't see anything there addressing Low's argument besides
> >
> > Sure you did, but you're a lying fvcking scumbag for whom this topic is
> > well over your idiot masses layman head. If it weren't over your head
> > you would have taken me up on the challenge where I explicitly told you
> > how you could prove me wrong:
> > At https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igyujM_HSj0 I claim that for α, β, κ
> > constants β≠–1 κ≠0,2 ds²=[exp(2αz/c²)][dct²-(dz+
> > βdct)²]-{exp[(1±√(1+2κ-κ²))(1+β)α(z+(β-1)ct)/c²]}dx²-{exp[κ(1+β)α(z+(β-1)ct)/c²]}dy²
>
> Not even is a partial differential equation. Give me a break. Give me tensors.
The metric tensor is read directly off that line element,
ds²=[exp(2αz/c²)][dct²-(dz+ βdct)²]-{exp[(1±√(1+2κ-κ²))(1+β)α(z+(β-1)ct)/c²]}dx²-{exp[κ(1+β)α(z+(β-1)ct)/c²]}dy²
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igyujM_HSj0
, moron. Its not supposed to be a partial differential equation. What is wrong with you idiots?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-25 14:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <122d495d-8bda-4b6a-a94c-88c923b83c55@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388191 |
On Friday, July 22, 2016 at 11:18:35 AM UTC-7, green wrote:
> David Waite wrote:
>
> >> I don't see anything there addressing Low's argument besides
> >
> > Sure you did, but you're a lying fvcking scumbag for whom this topic is
> > well over your idiot masses layman head. If it weren't over your head
> > you would have taken me up on the challenge where I explicitly told you
> > how you could prove me wrong:
> > At https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igyujM_HSj0 I claim that for α, β, κ
> > constants β≠–1 κ≠0,2 ds²=[exp(2αz/c²)][dct²-(dz+
> > βdct)²]-{exp[(1±√(1+2κ-κ²))(1+β)α(z+(β-1)ct)/c²]}dx²-{exp[κ(1+β)α(z+(β-1)ct)/c²]}dy²
>
> Not even is a partial differential equation. Give me a break. Give me tensors.
He DID write tensors. His mathematics is correct, I have a different problem
with his work.
--
Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-26 00:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <51619ac5-f47f-4574-9bcc-df4a663a217e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388407 |
On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 2:25:43 PM UTC-7, JanPB wrote:
> On Friday, July 22, 2016 at 11:18:35 AM UTC-7, green wrote:
> > David Waite wrote:
> >
> > >> I don't see anything there addressing Low's argument besides
> > >
> > > Sure you did, but you're a lying fvcking scumbag for whom this topic is
> > > well over your idiot masses layman head. If it weren't over your head
> > > you would have taken me up on the challenge where I explicitly told you
> > > how you could prove me wrong:
> > > At https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igyujM_HSj0 I claim that for α, β, κ
> > > constants β≠–1 κ≠0,2 ds²=[exp(2αz/c²)][dct²-(dz+
> > > βdct)²]-{exp[(1±√(1+2κ-κ²))(1+β)α(z+(β-1)ct)/c²]}dx²-{exp[κ(1+β)α(z+(β-1)ct)/c²]}dy²
> >
> > Not even is a partial differential equation. Give me a break. Give me tensors.
>
> He DID write tensors. His mathematics is correct, I have a different problem
> with his work.
>
> --
> Jan
And the fact that I can wok out such exact solutions where essentially no one is any longer able to to attests to the fact that I understand this stuff in a time where nearly no one else, including yourself, does.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nero <oldogf@yahoo.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-24 02:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9b8f2854-5e12-4508-b0b8-3390de050b45@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388013 |
Il giorno martedì 19 luglio 2016 08:29:34 UTC+2, mlwo...@wp.pl ha scritto: > W dniu poniedziałek, 18 lipca 2016 18:19:33 UTC+2 użytkownik PD napisał: > > > The principles in gedankens lead to experimental observations to test them. > > A day will come, when we accelerate our rivets > to 0.9c. > This day the wretched bugs will be crushed. > For the glory of Great Guru!!!!!!!!! ... the people of Isdrael is waiting for God from 3000 years ...but 2000 years ago Jesus came and many of them thougth and think also now that He was God .. perhaps the proves against the einsteinian Relativity are under our eyes ...it depends only from the readers .. an example ? the speed of light is 300 000 kms in all the frames ...but relatively to the gravitational center ( ICE ..and local ICEs )...like it showed by the Allan exp ( see also an old topic of this group , called 'W Allan' )...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-24 13:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nn27mr$d2s$1@node2.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #388261 |
Użytkownik "nero" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:9b8f2854-5e12-4508-b0b8-3390de050b45@googlegroups.com... Il giorno martedì 19 luglio 2016 08:29:34 UTC+2, mlwo...@wp.pl ha scritto: > W dniu poniedziałek, 18 lipca 2016 18:19:33 UTC+2 użytkownik PD napisał: > > > The principles in gedankens lead to experimental observations to test > > them. > > A day will come, when we accelerate our rivets > to 0.9c. > This day the wretched bugs will be crushed. > For the glory of Great Guru!!!!!!!!! |... the people of Isdrael is waiting for God from 3000 years ...but 2000 years ago Jesus came and many of them thougth and think also now that He was God .. | perhaps the proves against the einsteinian Relativity are under our eyes ...it depends only from the readers .. Perhaps the proofs for apples growing on an oak are under our eyes... perhaps whoever can't see them, is STUPID REALITY DENYING CRANK, UUUUU!!!!! Or perhaps ISO beaurecrats will get conscious and change the standard of the second back, and The Shit will vanish with a quiet "pyf!".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | paparios <paparios@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-24 07:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <03896133-58b6-495b-9890-dbf567342a07@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388265 |
El domingo, 24 de julio de 2016, 7:10:20 (UTC-4), Maciej Woźniak escribió: > Użytkownik "nero" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:9b8f2854-5e12-4508-b0b8-3390de050b45@googlegroups.com... > > Il giorno martedì 19 luglio 2016 08:29:34 UTC+2, mlwo...@wp.pl ha scritto: > > W dniu poniedziałek, 18 lipca 2016 18:19:33 UTC+2 użytkownik PD napisał: > > > > > The principles in gedankens lead to experimental observations to test > > > them. > > > > A day will come, when we accelerate our rivets > > to 0.9c. > > This day the wretched bugs will be crushed. > > For the glory of Great Guru!!!!!!!!! > > |... the people of Isdrael is waiting for God from 3000 years ...but 2000 > years ago Jesus came and many of them thougth and think also now that He was > God .. > | perhaps the proves against the einsteinian Relativity are under our eyes > ...it depends only from the readers .. > > Perhaps the proofs for apples growing on an oak are under > our eyes... perhaps whoever can't see them, is STUPID > REALITY DENYING CRANK, UUUUU!!!!! > Or perhaps ISO beaurecrats will get conscious and change > the standard of the second back, and The Shit will vanish > with a quiet "pyf!". Cut the crap...you are just a shitting and farting asshole!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-24 17:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nn2l6h$qmi$1@node2.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #388276 |
Użytkownik "paparios" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:03896133-58b6-495b-9890-dbf567342a07@googlegroups.com... El domingo, 24 de julio de 2016, 7:10:20 (UTC-4), Maciej Woźniak escribió: > Użytkownik "nero" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:9b8f2854-5e12-4508-b0b8-3390de050b45@googlegroups.com... > > Il giorno martedì 19 luglio 2016 08:29:34 UTC+2, mlwo...@wp.pl ha scritto: > > W dniu poniedziałek, 18 lipca 2016 18:19:33 UTC+2 użytkownik PD napisał: > > > > > The principles in gedankens lead to experimental observations to test > > > them. > > > > A day will come, when we accelerate our rivets > > to 0.9c. > > This day the wretched bugs will be crushed. > > For the glory of Great Guru!!!!!!!!! > > |... the people of Isdrael is waiting for God from 3000 years ...but 2000 > years ago Jesus came and many of them thougth and think also now that He > was > God .. > | perhaps the proves against the einsteinian Relativity are under our eyes > ...it depends only from the readers .. > > Perhaps the proofs for apples growing on an oak are under > our eyes... perhaps whoever can't see them, is STUPID > REALITY DENYING CRANK, UUUUU!!!!! > Or perhaps ISO beaurecrats will get conscious and change > the standard of the second back, and The Shit will vanish > with a quiet "pyf!". |Cut the crap...you are just a shitting and farting asshole! Cut the crap...you are just a shitting and farting asshole!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-24 13:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9edf025a-4b56-409c-98a3-327a499432ec@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388276 |
On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 7:20:13 AM UTC-7, paparios wrote: > El domingo, 24 de julio de 2016, 7:10:20 (UTC-4), Maciej Woźniak escribió: > > Użytkownik "nero" napisał w wiadomości grup > > dyskusyjnych:9b8f2854-5e12-4508-b0b8-3390de050b45@googlegroups.com... > > > > Il giorno martedì 19 luglio 2016 08:29:34 UTC+2, mlwo...@wp.pl ha scritto: > > > W dniu poniedziałek, 18 lipca 2016 18:19:33 UTC+2 użytkownik PD napisał: > > > > > > > The principles in gedankens lead to experimental observations to test > > > > them. > > > > > > A day will come, when we accelerate our rivets > > > to 0.9c. > > > This day the wretched bugs will be crushed. > > > For the glory of Great Guru!!!!!!!!! > > > > |... the people of Isdrael is waiting for God from 3000 years ...but 2000 > > years ago Jesus came and many of them thougth and think also now that He was > > God .. > > | perhaps the proves against the einsteinian Relativity are under our eyes > > ...it depends only from the readers .. > > > > Perhaps the proofs for apples growing on an oak are under > > our eyes... perhaps whoever can't see them, is STUPID > > REALITY DENYING CRANK, UUUUU!!!!! > > Or perhaps ISO beaurecrats will get conscious and change > > the standard of the second back, and The Shit will vanish > > with a quiet "pyf!". > > Cut the crap...you are just a shitting and farting asshole! I rather like the "UUUUU!" part. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-24 07:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d7e836a4-4dcd-4722-a039-647383e4dca7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388261 |
On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 2:11:37 AM UTC-7, nero wrote: > Il giorno martedì 19 luglio 2016 08:29:34 UTC+2, mlwo...@wp.pl ha scritto: > > W dniu poniedziałek, 18 lipca 2016 18:19:33 UTC+2 użytkownik PD napisał: > > > > > The principles in gedankens lead to experimental observations to test them. > > > > A day will come, when we accelerate our rivets > > to 0.9c. > > This day the wretched bugs will be crushed. > > For the glory of Great Guru!!!!!!!!! > > ... the people of Isdrael is waiting for God from 3000 years ...but 2000 years ago Jesus came and many of them thougth and think also now that He was God .. > perhaps the proves against the einsteinian Relativity are under our eyes ...it depends only from the readers .. > an example ? the speed of light is 300 000 kms in all the frames ...but relatively to the gravitational center ( ICE ..and local ICEs )...like it showed by the Allan exp ( see also an old topic of this group , called 'W Allan' )... Gods don't exist lunatic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-24 11:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5d669163-46a9-46ef-9dd2-73174fa843df@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388278 |
On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 8:56:14 AM UTC-6, David Waite wrote: > > Gods don't exist lunatic. So where did this come from? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6HLg2XUFOg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWFUCcUTHu4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7V6gdpYuUQ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-24 11:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fbbfce59-ee31-4fb6-8f8f-a0bb13aeb336@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388283 |
On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 11:09:05 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 8:56:14 AM UTC-6, David Waite wrote: > > > > Gods don't exist lunatic. > > So where did this come from?... Irrational idiot religionists that see what they emotionally need to see despite the weight of evidence against it like you do.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-24 15:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62afabae-9493-4b61-b9a9-6ce886694385@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388288 |
On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 12:55:26 PM UTC-6, David Waite wrote: > > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 11:09:05 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 8:56:14 AM UTC-6, David Waite wrote: > > > > > > Gods don't exist lunatic. > > > > So where did this come from?... > > Irrational idiot religionists that see what they emotionally need to > see despite the weight of evidence against it like you do. Nope. Guess again, because that's all you're doing is guessing. You have zero evidence for your failed belief system. And yes, I know you're too insane to realize how stupid you will see that you are one day. Look me up then and we will have a sane talk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-25 10:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a3a8943e-a9dd-43bc-9e4b-77eb70962fe8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388313 |
On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 3:38:18 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 12:55:26 PM UTC-6, David Waite wrote: > > > > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 11:09:05 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 8:56:14 AM UTC-6, David Waite wrote: > > > > > > > > Gods don't exist lunatic. > > > > > > So where did this come from?... > > > > Irrational idiot religionists that see what they emotionally need to > > see despite the weight of evidence against it like you do. > > Nope. Guess again, because that's all you're doing is guessing. You > have zero evidence for your failed belief system.... So you're talking to yourself again. You're the idiot masses proposing the insane belief system in whatever Gods, or in your case the completely idiotic belief in a magic flying zombie. I mean how do you get more completely moronic than that? Yeah I know, the Mormon occult where you become a magic flying zombie yourself is a little more moronic, but I mean you really are next to them in utterly idiotic insane propositions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-25 15:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e0d8c50e-bfc1-4d82-b4c6-90e76482d4d9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388389 |
On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 11:29:16 AM UTC-6, David Waite wrote: > > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 3:38:18 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 12:55:26 PM UTC-6, David Waite wrote: > > > > > > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 11:09:05 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 8:56:14 AM UTC-6, David Waite wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Gods don't exist lunatic. > > > > > > > > So where did this come from?... > > > > > > Irrational idiot religionists that see what they emotionally need to > > > see despite the weight of evidence against it like you do. > > > > Nope. Guess again, because that's all you're doing is guessing. You > > have zero evidence for your failed belief system.... > > So you're talking to yourself again. That's just another of your false opinions :-) > You're the idiot masses proposing the insane belief system in whatever Gods, > or in your case the completely idiotic belief in a magic flying zombie. And that's just another of your useless and false beliefs. > I mean how do you get more completely moronic than that? Yeah I know, the > Mormon occult where you become a magic flying zombie yourself is a little > more moronic, but I mean you really are next to them in utterly idiotic > insane propositions. My, but you really are getting all lathered up about something. Settle down and concern yourself with physics. You certainly aren't competent to discuss religion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-26 00:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <16d7191e-443e-49aa-8079-26ff918c815d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #388418 |
On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 3:42:14 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 11:29:16 AM UTC-6, David Waite wrote: > > > > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 3:38:18 PM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 12:55:26 PM UTC-6, David Waite wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 11:09:05 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 8:56:14 AM UTC-6, David Waite wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Gods don't exist lunatic. > > > > > > > > > > So where did this come from?... > > > > > > > > Irrational idiot religionists that see what they emotionally need to > > > > see despite the weight of evidence against it like you do. > > > > > > Nope. Guess again, because that's all you're doing is guessing. You > > > have zero evidence for your failed belief system.... > > > > So you're talking to yourself again. > > That's just another of your false opinions No you fvcking dumbasz religionist, its fact. You're a part of the fvcking idiot masses believing what you emotionally need to believe instead of whats rational as supported by evidence. I mean how dare you promote the immorality of the bible, koran, book of mormon, or whatever other mythical immoral religionist crap you support? You're a complete scumbag for promoting the worship of a magic flying zombie and pretending to be in any way representative of any kind of scientific thought. You are utterly beneath me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web