Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #387948 > unrolled thread

Do you like gedanken?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-17 23:41 -0700
    Re: Do you like gedanken? PD <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 08:12 -0700
      Re: Do you like gedanken? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-18 18:03 +0200
        Re: Do you like gedanken? PD <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 09:19 -0700
          Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 11:34 -0500
            Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-18 23:27 -0700
              Re: Do you like gedanken? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 10:54 -0700
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 13:08 -0500
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-19 21:47 +0200
                  Re: Do you like gedanken? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 14:32 -0700
                    Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-19 23:04 -0700
                      Re: Do you like gedanken? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 23:19 -0700
                        Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-20 00:00 -0700
          Re: Do you like gedanken? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-18 19:27 +0200
            Re: Do you like gedanken? PD <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 13:09 -0700
              Re: Do you like gedanken? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-18 22:16 +0200
          Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-19 00:07 -0700
            Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-19 01:52 -0700
              Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-19 14:20 +0000
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-19 17:38 +0200
                Re: Do you like gedanken? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-19 17:50 +0200
                  Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-19 16:50 +0000
                    Re: Do you like gedanken? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 10:55 -0700
                    Re: Do you like gedanken? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-19 21:45 +0200
                      Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-20 17:49 +0000
                        Re: Do you like gedanken? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-20 21:48 +0200
                          Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-20 20:49 +0000
                            Re: Do you like gedanken? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-21 00:16 +0200
                              Re: Do you like gedanken? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 16:17 -0700
                                Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-20 23:12 -0700
                                  Re: Do you like gedanken? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 23:46 -0700
                                    Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-20 23:54 -0700
                                      Re: Do you like gedanken? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 11:16 -0700
                                        Re: Do you like gedanken? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-21 22:44 +0200
                                          Re: Do you like gedanken? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 16:19 -0700
                                            Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-21 23:28 -0700
                              Re: Do you like gedanken? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-21 15:08 +0000
                                Re: Do you like gedanken? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-21 18:08 +0200
                                  Re: Do you like gedanken? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 11:18 -0700
                                    Re: Do you like gedanken? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-21 22:46 +0200
                                      Re: Do you like gedanken? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 16:18 -0700
                                        Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-21 23:24 -0700
                                          Re: Do you like gedanken? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 00:22 -0700
                                            Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-22 00:35 -0700
                        Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-21 00:04 -0700
    Re: Do you like gedanken? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 13:23 -0700
      Re: Do you like gedanken? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-18 23:43 +0200
        Re: Do you like gedanken? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 15:22 -0700
          Re: Do you like gedanken? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-18 23:24 -0700

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#387948 — Do you like gedanken?

Suppose the bureaucrates from ISO get conscious
and return to old, day-related second.
What will happen then: your Shit will make a quiet
"pyf!" and vanish.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#387971

On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:41:59 AM UTC-5, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> Suppose the bureaucrates from ISO get conscious
> and return to old, day-related second.
> What will happen then: your Shit will make a quiet
> "pyf!" and vanish.

I suppose that's a fun fantasy for you to engage in. I also suppose it's extremely unlikely, for documented reasons.

Maybe it would be good to suppose what things would be like if the Piast dynasty came back to power. Then all those engineers and software models will make a quiet "pyf!" and vanish.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#387975

Użytkownik "PD"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
dyskusyjnych:7d8e6cf4-1d3b-4ada-a5fe-8a535841a228@googlegroups.com...

On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:41:59 AM UTC-5, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> Suppose the bureaucrates from ISO get conscious
> and return to old, day-related second.
> What will happen then: your Shit will make a quiet
> "pyf!" and vanish.

|I suppose that's a fun fantasy for you to engage in.
|I also suppose it's extremely unlikely, for documented reasons.

It's well documented you're a puffed, brainwashed moron
convinced about your incredible wisdom and awesome
power.
Anyway, it's just a gedanken. You can consider a twins
looking at a clock passing him with 0.99c, and I can
consider people not obeying your bunch of idiots.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#387978

On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 11:03:24 AM UTC-5, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> Użytkownik "PD"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
> dyskusyjnych:7d8e6cf4-1d3b-4ada-a5fe-8a535841a228@googlegroups.com...
> 
> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:41:59 AM UTC-5, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> > Suppose the bureaucrates from ISO get conscious
> > and return to old, day-related second.
> > What will happen then: your Shit will make a quiet
> > "pyf!" and vanish.
> 
> |I suppose that's a fun fantasy for you to engage in.
> |I also suppose it's extremely unlikely, for documented reasons.
> 
> It's well documented you're a puffed, brainwashed moron
> convinced about your incredible wisdom and awesome
> power.
> Anyway, it's just a gedanken. You can consider a twins
> looking at a clock passing him with 0.99c, and I can
> consider people not obeying your bunch of idiots.

The principles in gedankens lead to experimental observations to test them. Your fantasy about how much prettier life would be like for you if only the second was still tied to an earth's rotation is not going to be put to experimental test, is it? That's the difference between fantasy and science.

There are clocks, by the way, that travel at 0.99c with respect to the laboratory, and those have been used to test those gedankens.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#387979

On 7/18/2016 11:19 AM, PD wrote:
> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 11:03:24 AM UTC-5, Maciej Woźniak wrote:

>> It's well documented you're a puffed, brainwashed moron
>> convinced about your incredible wisdom and awesome
>> power.
>> Anyway, it's just a gedanken. You can consider a twins
>> looking at a clock passing him with 0.99c, and I can
>> consider people not obeying your bunch of idiots.
>
> The principles in gedankens lead to experimental observations to test them. Your
> fantasy about how much prettier life would be like for you if only the second was
> still tied to an earth's rotation is not going to be put to experimental test, is
> it? That's the difference between fantasy and science.
>
> There are clocks, by the way, that travel at 0.99c with respect to the laboratory,
> and those have been used to test those gedankens.
>

There are people here whose sole message seems to be "Pthbpthbltpthttt!"

I suppose this is supposed to translate into "I don't like physics or 
physicists. I think they are all nincompoops and should be banned. And 
so I show you all my buttocks." But it's never really much more 
articulate or creative than "Pthbpthbltpthttt!"

Of course, why they would spend extensive time in a physics discussion 
board just to grunt such inarticulate noises is beyond me. It'd be just 
like buying a ticket to a baseball game and then spending the whole game 
booing both sides and the umpires.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388012

W dniu poniedziałek, 18 lipca 2016 18:34:31 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał:
> On 7/18/2016 11:19 AM, PD wrote:
> > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 11:03:24 AM UTC-5, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> 
> >> It's well documented you're a puffed, brainwashed moron
> >> convinced about your incredible wisdom and awesome
> >> power.
> >> Anyway, it's just a gedanken. You can consider a twins
> >> looking at a clock passing him with 0.99c, and I can
> >> consider people not obeying your bunch of idiots.
> >
> > The principles in gedankens lead to experimental observations to test them. Your
> > fantasy about how much prettier life would be like for you if only the second was
> > still tied to an earth's rotation is not going to be put to experimental test, is
> > it? That's the difference between fantasy and science.
> >
> > There are clocks, by the way, that travel at 0.99c with respect to the laboratory,
> > and those have been used to test those gedankens.
> >
> 
> There are people here whose sole message seems to be "Pthbpthbltpthttt!"
> 
> I suppose this is supposed to translate into "I don't like physics or 
> physicists. I think they are all nincompoops and should be banned. And 
> so I show you all my buttocks." But it's never really much more 
> articulate or creative than "Pthbpthbltpthttt!"
> 
> Of course, why they would spend extensive time in a physics discussion 
> board just to grunt such inarticulate noises is beyond me. It'd be just 
> like buying a ticket to a baseball game and then spending the whole game 
> booing both sides and the umpires.

I suppose this is supposed to translate into "I 
adore Great Guru!! I adore The Shit!!!! Whoever
criticize it, is STUPID!!!!". But it's never really 
much more articulate or creative than 
"Pthbpthbltpthttt!"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388040

On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 11:27:26 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> W dniu poniedziałek, 18 lipca 2016 18:34:31 UTC+2 użytkownik Odd Bodkin napisał:
> > On 7/18/2016 11:19 AM, PD wrote:
> > > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 11:03:24 AM UTC-5, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> > 
> > >> It's well documented you're a puffed, brainwashed moron
> > >> convinced about your incredible wisdom and awesome
> > >> power.
> > >> Anyway, it's just a gedanken. You can consider a twins
> > >> looking at a clock passing him with 0.99c, and I can
> > >> consider people not obeying your bunch of idiots.
> > >
> > > The principles in gedankens lead to experimental observations to test them. Your
> > > fantasy about how much prettier life would be like for you if only the second was
> > > still tied to an earth's rotation is not going to be put to experimental test, is
> > > it? That's the difference between fantasy and science.
> > >
> > > There are clocks, by the way, that travel at 0.99c with respect to the laboratory,
> > > and those have been used to test those gedankens.
> > >
> > 
> > There are people here whose sole message seems to be "Pthbpthbltpthttt!"
> > 
> > I suppose this is supposed to translate into "I don't like physics or 
> > physicists. I think they are all nincompoops and should be banned. And 
> > so I show you all my buttocks." But it's never really much more 
> > articulate or creative than "Pthbpthbltpthttt!"
> > 
> > Of course, why they would spend extensive time in a physics discussion 
> > board just to grunt such inarticulate noises is beyond me. It'd be just 
> > like buying a ticket to a baseball game and then spending the whole game 
> > booing both sides and the umpires.
> 
> I suppose this is supposed to translate into "I 
> adore Great Guru!! I adore The Shit!!!! Whoever
> criticize it, is STUPID!!!!". But it's never really 
> much more articulate or creative than 
> "Pthbpthbltpthttt!"

No, not "whoever criticises it is stupid". Criticism is healthy and is
of course a part of science.

What you do is not any "criticism", it's just yelling invective.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388042

On 7/19/2016 12:54 PM, JanPB wrote:
>> > I suppose this is supposed to translate into "I
>> > adore Great Guru!! I adore The Shit!!!! Whoever
>> > criticize it, is STUPID!!!!". But it's never really
>> > much more articulate or creative than
>> > "Pthbpthbltpthttt!"
> No, not "whoever criticises it is stupid". Criticism is healthy and is
> of course a part of science.
>
> What you do is not any "criticism", it's just yelling invective.

Right. "Moron" and "Guru Shit" are not criticisms. They are inarticulate 
grunting noises. The kind of noise one makes when one is about to vomit. 
Vomiting is also not criticism.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388049

Użytkownik "JanPB"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
dyskusyjnych:c6684423-8867-4053-93e2-def04bb7f296@googlegroups.com...

>
> I suppose this is supposed to translate into "I
> adore Great Guru!! I adore The Shit!!!! Whoever
> criticize it, is STUPID!!!!". But it's never really
> much more articulate or creative than
> "Pthbpthbltpthttt!"

|No, not "whoever criticises it is stupid". Criticism is healthy and is
|of course a part of science.

Of course, it is, but not the criticism of obviously right Shit
of the Great Guru.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388051

On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 12:47:49 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> Użytkownik "JanPB"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
> dyskusyjnych:c6684423-8867-4053-93e2-def04bb7f296@googlegroups.com...
> 
> >
> > I suppose this is supposed to translate into "I
> > adore Great Guru!! I adore The Shit!!!! Whoever
> > criticize it, is STUPID!!!!". But it's never really
> > much more articulate or creative than
> > "Pthbpthbltpthttt!"
> 
> |No, not "whoever criticises it is stupid". Criticism is healthy and is
> |of course a part of science.
> 
> Of course, it is, but not the criticism of obviously right Shit
> of the Great Guru.

You can post invective all you want, it won't change anything.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388062

W dniu wtorek, 19 lipca 2016 23:33:01 UTC+2 użytkownik JanPB napisał:
> On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 12:47:49 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> > Użytkownik "JanPB"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
> > dyskusyjnych:c6684423-8867-4053-93e2-def04bb7f296@googlegroups.com...
> > 
> > >
> > > I suppose this is supposed to translate into "I
> > > adore Great Guru!! I adore The Shit!!!! Whoever
> > > criticize it, is STUPID!!!!". But it's never really
> > > much more articulate or creative than
> > > "Pthbpthbltpthttt!"
> > 
> > |No, not "whoever criticises it is stupid". Criticism is healthy and is
> > |of course a part of science.
> > 
> > Of course, it is, but not the criticism of obviously right Shit
> > of the Great Guru.
> 
> You can post invective all you want, it won't change anything.

You can yell and wave your arms all you want, it won't
change anything. Real clocks indicate t'=t, and they
will.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388064

On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 11:04:31 PM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> W dniu wtorek, 19 lipca 2016 23:33:01 UTC+2 użytkownik JanPB napisał:
> > On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 12:47:49 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> > > Użytkownik "JanPB"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
> > > dyskusyjnych:c6684423-8867-4053-93e2-def04bb7f296@googlegroups.com...
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > I suppose this is supposed to translate into "I
> > > > adore Great Guru!! I adore The Shit!!!! Whoever
> > > > criticize it, is STUPID!!!!". But it's never really
> > > > much more articulate or creative than
> > > > "Pthbpthbltpthttt!"
> > > 
> > > |No, not "whoever criticises it is stupid". Criticism is healthy and is
> > > |of course a part of science.
> > > 
> > > Of course, it is, but not the criticism of obviously right Shit
> > > of the Great Guru.
> > 
> > You can post invective all you want, it won't change anything.
> 
> You can yell and wave your arms all you want, it won't
> change anything. Real clocks indicate t'=t, and they
> will.

Repeating random words won't get you anywhere either.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388066

W dniu środa, 20 lipca 2016 08:19:17 UTC+2 użytkownik JanPB napisał:
> On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 11:04:31 PM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> > W dniu wtorek, 19 lipca 2016 23:33:01 UTC+2 użytkownik JanPB napisał:
> > > On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 12:47:49 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> > > > Użytkownik "JanPB"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
> > > > dyskusyjnych:c6684423-8867-4053-93e2-def04bb7f296@googlegroups.com...
> > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > > I suppose this is supposed to translate into "I
> > > > > adore Great Guru!! I adore The Shit!!!! Whoever
> > > > > criticize it, is STUPID!!!!". But it's never really
> > > > > much more articulate or creative than
> > > > > "Pthbpthbltpthttt!"
> > > > 
> > > > |No, not "whoever criticises it is stupid". Criticism is healthy and is
> > > > |of course a part of science.
> > > > 
> > > > Of course, it is, but not the criticism of obviously right Shit
> > > > of the Great Guru.
> > > 
> > > You can post invective all you want, it won't change anything.
> > 
> > You can yell and wave your arms all you want, it won't
> > change anything. Real clocks indicate t'=t, and they
> > will.
> 
> Repeating random words won't get you anywhere either.

They're not random. You're simply too stupid
to deal with them, so they look random to you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#387984

Użytkownik "PD"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
dyskusyjnych:06bec905-f859-4e76-879e-b6dcfc9bc96b@googlegroups.com...

On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 11:03:24 AM UTC-5, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> Użytkownik "PD"  napisał w wiadomości grup
> dyskusyjnych:7d8e6cf4-1d3b-4ada-a5fe-8a535841a228@googlegroups.com...
>
> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:41:59 AM UTC-5, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> > Suppose the bureaucrates from ISO get conscious
> > and return to old, day-related second.
> > What will happen then: your Shit will make a quiet
> > "pyf!" and vanish.
>
> |I suppose that's a fun fantasy for you to engage in.
> |I also suppose it's extremely unlikely, for documented reasons.
>
> It's well documented you're a puffed, brainwashed moron
> convinced about your incredible wisdom and awesome
> power.
> Anyway, it's just a gedanken. You can consider a twins
> looking at a clock passing him with 0.99c, and I can
> consider people not obeying your bunch of idiots.

|The principles in gedankens lead to experimental observations to test them.

A good joke. As expected from a puffed moron.


| Your fantasy about how much prettier life would be like for you if only 
the second was still tied to an earth's rotation is not going to be put to 
experimental test, is it?

Well, yes, it is.
In opposition to your observers falling into black holes
and others phantasmagories.
That's the difference between a thinking man and
an idiot pseudoscientist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388001

On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 12:28:10 PM UTC-5, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> Użytkownik "PD"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
> dyskusyjnych:06bec905-f859-4e76-879e-b6dcfc9bc96b@googlegroups.com...
> 
> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 11:03:24 AM UTC-5, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> > Użytkownik "PD"  napisał w wiadomości grup
> > dyskusyjnych:7d8e6cf4-1d3b-4ada-a5fe-8a535841a228@googlegroups.com...
> >
> > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:41:59 AM UTC-5, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> > > Suppose the bureaucrates from ISO get conscious
> > > and return to old, day-related second.
> > > What will happen then: your Shit will make a quiet
> > > "pyf!" and vanish.
> >
> > |I suppose that's a fun fantasy for you to engage in.
> > |I also suppose it's extremely unlikely, for documented reasons.
> >
> > It's well documented you're a puffed, brainwashed moron
> > convinced about your incredible wisdom and awesome
> > power.
> > Anyway, it's just a gedanken. You can consider a twins
> > looking at a clock passing him with 0.99c, and I can
> > consider people not obeying your bunch of idiots.
> 
> |The principles in gedankens lead to experimental observations to test them.
> 
> A good joke. As expected from a puffed moron.

Best jokes are the true ones.

> 
> 
> | Your fantasy about how much prettier life would be like for you if only 
> the second was still tied to an earth's rotation is not going to be put to 
> experimental test, is it?
> 
> Well, yes, it is.

We'll see, won't we? Are you counting on the ISO seeing things your way before you die, or is this something that you're willing to wait centuries for?

> In opposition to your observers falling into black holes
> and others phantasmagories.
> That's the difference between a thinking man and
> an idiot pseudoscientist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388003

Użytkownik "PD"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
dyskusyjnych:f5be6bd3-34ea-4cc3-9048-fc20948962ca@googlegroups.com...

On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 12:28:10 PM UTC-5, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> Użytkownik "PD"  napisał w wiadomości grup
> dyskusyjnych:06bec905-f859-4e76-879e-b6dcfc9bc96b@googlegroups.com...
>
> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 11:03:24 AM UTC-5, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
> > Użytkownik "PD"  napisał w wiadomości grup
> > dyskusyjnych:7d8e6cf4-1d3b-4ada-a5fe-8a535841a228@googlegroups.com...
> >
> > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:41:59 AM UTC-5, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
> > > Suppose the bureaucrates from ISO get conscious
> > > and return to old, day-related second.
> > > What will happen then: your Shit will make a quiet
> > > "pyf!" and vanish.
> >
> > |I suppose that's a fun fantasy for you to engage in.
> > |I also suppose it's extremely unlikely, for documented reasons.
> >
> > It's well documented you're a puffed, brainwashed moron
> > convinced about your incredible wisdom and awesome
> > power.
> > Anyway, it's just a gedanken. You can consider a twins
> > looking at a clock passing him with 0.99c, and I can
> > consider people not obeying your bunch of idiots.
>
> |The principles in gedankens lead to experimental observations to test 
> them.
>
> A good joke. As expected from a puffed moron.

|Best jokes are the true ones.

As true, as the rest of your mumble, poor idiot.

>
> | Your fantasy about how much prettier life would be like for you if only
> the second was still tied to an earth's rotation is not going to be put to
> experimental test, is it?
>
> Well, yes, it is.

|We'll see, won't we?

Maybe. It's much, much, much more probable, than seeing observers
falling into a black hole. Not even talking of flatlanders.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388017

W dniu poniedziałek, 18 lipca 2016 18:19:33 UTC+2 użytkownik PD napisał:

> There are clocks, by the way, that travel at 0.99c with respect to the laboratory, and those have been used to test those gedankens.

Look, poor idiot, this is how "clocks" look like:
https://www.google.pl/search?q=clock&client=firefox-b&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj0kMzi-_7NAhWmF5oKHcY1BsUQsAQIHA&biw=1329&bih=939

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388019

W dniu wtorek, 19 lipca 2016 09:07:49 UTC+2 użytkownik mlwo...@wp.pl napisał:
> W dniu poniedziałek, 18 lipca 2016 18:19:33 UTC+2 użytkownik PD napisał:
> 
> > There are clocks, by the way, that travel at 0.99c with respect to the laboratory, and those have been used to test those gedankens.
> 
> Look, poor idiot, this is how "clocks" look like:
> https://www.google.pl/search?q=clock&client=firefox-b&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj0kMzi-_7NAhWmF5oKHcY1BsUQsAQIHA&biw=1329&bih=939

Somehow, they all have 12 or 24 hours cycle. Strange,
isn't it? Of course, the coincidence with a day cycle
is purely accidential. They obviously can't be still 
tied to the earth's rotation. Relativistic moron and 
his standard has forbidden, and he feels sooooooooooo
important...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388034

mlwozniak@wp.pl writes:

>Somehow, they all have 12 or 24 hours cycle. Strange,
>isn't it? Of course, the coincidence with a day cycle
>is purely accidential. They obviously can't be still=20
>tied to the earth's rotation. Relativistic moron and=20
>his standard has forbidden, and he feels sooooooooooo
>important...

The second was definitely originally defined by the
earth rotation, but this is no longer true. For example,
this year will have a "leap second" and December 31, 2016
will be 86,401 seconds long rather than the usual 86,400
(60*60*24) seconds. The second no longer accurately tracks
the earth's rotation.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#388037

Użytkownik "Michael Moroney"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
dyskusyjnych:nmlcv2$qka$3@pcls7.std.com...

mlwozniak@wp.pl writes:

>Somehow, they all have 12 or 24 hours cycle. Strange,
>isn't it? Of course, the coincidence with a day cycle
>is purely accidential. They obviously can't be still=20
>tied to the earth's rotation. Relativistic moron and=20
>his standard has forbidden, and he feels sooooooooooo
>important...

The second was definitely originally defined by the
earth rotation, but this is no longer true. For example,
this year will have a "leap second" and December 31, 2016
will be 86,401 seconds long rather than the usual 86,400
(60*60*24) seconds. The second no longer accurately tracks
the earth's rotation. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web