Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #386788 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-28 20:21 +1000 |
| Last post | 2016-07-02 05:53 +1000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 376 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-06-28 20:21 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-28 12:16 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-28 22:27 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-30 11:50 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-06-30 21:38 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-30 22:25 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-07-01 14:07 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-01 14:49 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-06-30 23:44 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-01 17:13 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-01 00:21 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-01 18:57 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-01 02:54 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 05:21 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 07:50 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-01 06:21 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-02 05:26 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-02 12:46 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-03 06:41 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-07-02 15:59 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-07-02 20:45 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-02 18:12 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-03 14:39 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-07-02 23:10 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-03 17:17 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-07-03 01:18 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-03 19:54 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-03 23:20 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-04 21:03 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-04 21:29 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-05 08:25 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-05 10:03 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-06 07:15 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-06 11:46 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-07 11:06 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-04 05:47 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-05 08:30 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-04 19:34 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-04 20:42 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-06 07:22 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 16:30 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-07 05:27 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 14:47 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-07 07:20 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-04 15:09 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-03 23:28 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-07-03 07:50 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-04 08:44 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-07-03 17:07 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-07-04 08:10 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 11:34 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 11:32 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-05 08:47 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-07-04 16:43 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-06 07:28 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 16:38 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-05 14:56 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "Dr. Bob John" <drbobjohn@hotmail.org> - 2016-07-05 21:59 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 17:52 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-07 05:44 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 14:50 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-07 07:18 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 13:17 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 22:27 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-07-05 16:31 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-07 05:46 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? dancouriann@gmail.com - 2016-07-06 16:00 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-04 21:11 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 11:25 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-05 08:49 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 07:38 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-06 07:30 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 17:48 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 18:09 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-07 05:59 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 15:09 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-12 05:11 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-03 23:50 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-04 18:43 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-04 19:27 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-04 21:24 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-04 21:32 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-04 13:15 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-05 08:54 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-05 09:57 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-05 02:34 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-05 18:55 +0200
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-06 07:34 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 17:50 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-06 05:46 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 08:26 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-06 06:55 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 09:22 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-06 08:03 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 10:49 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-06 15:22 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 17:39 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-07 05:25 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 09:13 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-06 15:05 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-06 08:23 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-06 15:41 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 10:54 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-06 17:40 +0200
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-07 06:57 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 16:10 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-07 11:19 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-08 12:49 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-07-04 16:21 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-04 15:11 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-03 22:38 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-28 07:05 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-28 07:42 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-06-28 09:17 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-06-29 06:44 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-28 16:38 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-06-29 23:29 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 09:25 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-06-30 06:05 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 15:27 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-06-30 07:05 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 16:24 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-06-30 08:09 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 17:27 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-06-30 20:45 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 08:17 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-07-01 13:59 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-06-30 05:24 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 08:21 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-06-30 06:39 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 09:16 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-06-30 14:33 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 17:31 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-01 09:28 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 13:38 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-01 14:24 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-03 05:01 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 11:25 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-04 10:48 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 13:03 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-04 13:30 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 07:35 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-05 06:38 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 08:50 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-05 11:18 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 13:28 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-06 06:03 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 08:43 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-06 08:17 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-06 15:33 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-07 06:04 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 09:24 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-07 09:21 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 12:24 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-07 17:54 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-08 04:30 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-08 05:39 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-08 14:24 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-08 15:08 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-09 03:11 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-09 05:28 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-07-09 07:36 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-10 03:53 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-10 05:10 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 08:24 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 04:56 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 07:47 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 06:42 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 09:22 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 13:04 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 07:38 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-08 05:48 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-08 06:27 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 08:59 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-08 15:24 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-08 14:58 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 08:22 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 04:48 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 07:46 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 06:39 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 09:21 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-11 13:01 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 08:29 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-12 15:19 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 08:39 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-14 04:15 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 09:25 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-14 23:22 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-15 07:43 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 10:14 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-15 13:35 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 15:46 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-15 21:46 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-16 07:06 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-16 09:19 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-17 02:48 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-16 05:05 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 12:52 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-16 11:55 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 16:45 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-17 05:59 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 15:36 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-17 19:59 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 06:47 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-18 06:02 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 08:28 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 08:34 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-18 09:02 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 11:15 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-18 17:23 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:28 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 09:34 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-18 10:41 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:44 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:46 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:53 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-18 11:21 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 13:30 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-19 07:16 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:50 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 13:00 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-18 11:17 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 13:28 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 13:34 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-20 05:58 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 08:41 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-20 14:06 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 16:42 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-21 04:21 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 09:20 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 15:37 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-18 04:41 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 06:52 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-18 15:33 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-18 10:31 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 12:41 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-07-20 08:34 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 18:04 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-07-19 08:39 +0200
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-18 03:27 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 12:53 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-16 11:48 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-07-17 10:30 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-17 11:50 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-07-18 08:42 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-18 03:29 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-07-19 08:43 +0200
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-07-20 08:25 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 18:03 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-07-20 12:51 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-07-20 18:54 +0200
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-07-21 08:29 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-13 14:59 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-14 04:26 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-14 13:30 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-15 08:44 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 10:58 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-15 16:17 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-07 14:53 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-07 09:10 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-07 16:35 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 12:07 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-08 05:22 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 07:43 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 10:53 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-06 13:53 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 16:07 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-06 22:25 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 17:41 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-07 02:52 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-07 05:38 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 09:20 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-07 09:18 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 12:09 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 12:28 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 11:05 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-07 09:24 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 12:26 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-08 05:27 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 07:46 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 11:05 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-04 10:40 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-04 13:02 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-04 13:23 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 07:33 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 08:52 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-06-30 06:00 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 15:21 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-06-30 07:07 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 16:26 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-30 04:16 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-06-30 20:52 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 08:19 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-07-01 14:02 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-03 20:14 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-04 09:27 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-04 02:58 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-04 17:00 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-05 09:18 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-04 21:43 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-06-30 11:00 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-02 05:50 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 16:58 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-07-02 10:41 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 08:52 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-06 07:07 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 16:39 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-07 05:07 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 05:55 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-07-06 13:07 +0200
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-07 05:24 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-07-07 14:54 +0200
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-07-10 10:03 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-07-10 14:47 +0200
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-12 05:06 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-07-11 23:01 +0200
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-07-13 08:19 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-07-13 21:05 +0200
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-13 00:05 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-06 12:47 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 14:52 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-07 07:12 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 16:42 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-08 15:35 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-07-10 10:08 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-10 13:22 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 08:27 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? HGW <hw@....> - 2016-07-13 08:23 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-13 16:26 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-12 23:55 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 06:50 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-07-13 07:17 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-13 11:27 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 13:45 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-13 23:30 +0200
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 06:24 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 08:42 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-14 04:22 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 09:25 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-15 13:39 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-07-16 08:38 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-07-15 16:18 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 12:47 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 13:02 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-16 11:46 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 16:39 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-17 05:51 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-17 07:06 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-07-17 16:11 +0200
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-17 07:44 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-17 09:41 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-17 12:45 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-17 18:07 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-18 04:47 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 06:54 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 15:34 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-03 15:02 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-07-03 11:42 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-07-04 06:10 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-04 09:23 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-03 19:12 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-04 16:37 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-04 21:26 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-04 04:38 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-05 09:05 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-05 04:41 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-06 20:07 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-06 05:07 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-04 02:46 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-04 16:51 +0000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-04 21:36 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-04 04:49 -0700
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-05 09:01 +1000
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 07:40 -0500
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-07-01 08:41 +0200
Re: How Stupid Can a Dingleberry Get? "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-07-02 05:53 +1000
Page 11 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 19 Next page →
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-17 05:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3c42e4f0-803a-4189-93e1-f5253b3a3eee@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #387898 |
On Saturday, July 16, 2016 at 5:45:50 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/16/2016 1:55 PM, kenseto wrote: > > On Saturday, July 16, 2016 at 1:52:32 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 7/16/2016 7:05 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>> On Friday, July 15, 2016 at 4:46:55 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> On 7/15/2016 3:35 PM, kenseto wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> I really don't think so, even using YOUR choices. But feel free to do > >>>>>>>>>>> the substitutions you think should go it and then follow the steps and > >>>>>>>>>>> see what you get. You're not going to get the same transit times. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If you put a minus sign in front of the 5 meters for light going from right to left > >>>>>>>>> and put this into the LT you will get the same answer. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No you won't. Prove it by doing the algebra. You'll see. > >>>>> Yes you will.....do the algebra, a 5th grader can do it. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Assertion is not an argument. Prove your assertion that you get the same > >>>> answer by doing the math. Otherwise, it's just an empty assertion. > >>>> > >>>> (Calling your bluff. You know you can't do it. I know you can't do it. > >>>> Everyone knows you can't do it.) > >>> > >>> I'll give you the following correct equations for each direction. That's more > >>> than you ever gave me when you ask me to do a problem.....most of the time you > >>> asked me to go and read a book. > >> > >> Those are not the right equations. I gave you the right equations. You > >> can substitute the quantities you want into those correct equations. > >> > >>> Transit time left to right: > >>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) > >>> Transit time right to left: > >>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(-5/c)-v(-5)/c^2)) > >>> > >>> Now a 5th grader can see that both directions gave the same answer for transit time....can you see that?? > >> > >> Those do NOT give the same answer. > >> > >> First of all, how much (in seconds) is Delta(5/c)? I know how to find > >> (5m/c), but how much is Delta(5/c)? > > > > It is understood that we were talking about 5m. > > OK, so 5 m/c = (5 m)/(3E8 m/s) = 1.7E-8 s. > So what's Delta(5m/c)? > > >> > >> Secondly do you believe that Delta(5/c) = Delta(-5/c)? > > > > Yes equal but in the opposite directions. > > > > -5m/c is -1.7E-8s. That's a NEGATIVE time of traversal, which means that > it arrived before it was emitted. No idiot....-1.7E-8s is the time interval in the right to left direction from the origin of your coordinate system. Gee you are stupid. > Are you claiming that a NEGATIVE time of traversal means a positive time > of traversal from right to left? No idiot.....there is no such thing as negative time. There is time in different directions from the origin of our coordinate system.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-17 15:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmgq8a$tee$8@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #387912 |
On 7/17/2016 7:59 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>> Transit time left to right: >>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) >>>>> Transit time right to left: >>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(-5/c)-v(-5)/c^2)) >>>>> >>>>> Now a 5th grader can see that both directions gave the same answer for transit time....can you see that?? >>>> >>>> Those do NOT give the same answer. >>>> >>>> First of all, how much (in seconds) is Delta(5/c)? I know how to find >>>> (5m/c), but how much is Delta(5/c)? >>> >>> It is understood that we were talking about 5m. >> >> OK, so 5 m/c = (5 m)/(3E8 m/s) = 1.7E-8 s. >> So what's Delta(5m/c)? Haven't answered this question. What's Delta(5m/c) if (5m/c)=1.7E-8s? It's your equation. Do you know how to use it? What's the number for Delta(5m/c)? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-17 19:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <377d1b1e-19fe-45bf-9dd5-8947927c00ce@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #387925 |
On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 4:36:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/17/2016 7:59 AM, kenseto wrote: > > > >>>>> Transit time left to right: > >>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) > >>>>> Transit time right to left: > >>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(-5/c)-v(-5)/c^2)) > >>>>> > >>>>> Now a 5th grader can see that both directions gave the same answer for transit time....can you see that?? > >>>> > >>>> Those do NOT give the same answer. > >>>> > >>>> First of all, how much (in seconds) is Delta(5/c)? I know how to find > >>>> (5m/c), but how much is Delta(5/c)? > >>> > >>> It is understood that we were talking about 5m. > >> > >> OK, so 5 m/c = (5 m)/(3E8 m/s) = 1.7E-8 s. > >> So what's Delta(5m/c)? > > Haven't answered this question. What's Delta(5m/c) if (5m/c)=1.7E-8s? > > It's your equation. Do you know how to use it? What's the number for > Delta(5m/c)? Idiot look up what the word Delta mean in physics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 06:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmifjg$17od$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #387934 |
On 7/17/2016 9:59 PM, kenseto wrote: > On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 4:36:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 7/17/2016 7:59 AM, kenseto wrote: >> >> >>>>>>> Transit time left to right: >>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) >>>>>>> Transit time right to left: >>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(-5/c)-v(-5)/c^2)) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now a 5th grader can see that both directions gave the same answer for transit time....can you see that?? >>>>>> >>>>>> Those do NOT give the same answer. >>>>>> >>>>>> First of all, how much (in seconds) is Delta(5/c)? I know how to find >>>>>> (5m/c), but how much is Delta(5/c)? >>>>> >>>>> It is understood that we were talking about 5m. >>>> >>>> OK, so 5 m/c = (5 m)/(3E8 m/s) = 1.7E-8 s. >>>> So what's Delta(5m/c)? >> >> Haven't answered this question. What's Delta(5m/c) if (5m/c)=1.7E-8s? >> >> It's your equation. Do you know how to use it? What's the number for >> Delta(5m/c)? > > Idiot look up what the word Delta mean in physics. > It means change in. So what's the number for Delta(5m/c)? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 06:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0191f6ed-6b2e-474a-838a-d57be6d7164c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #387952 |
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 7:46:59 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/17/2016 9:59 PM, kenseto wrote: > > On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 4:36:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 7/17/2016 7:59 AM, kenseto wrote: > >> > >> > >>>>>>> Transit time left to right: > >>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) > >>>>>>> Transit time right to left: > >>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(-5/c)-v(-5)/c^2)) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Now a 5th grader can see that both directions gave the same answer for transit time....can you see that?? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Those do NOT give the same answer. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> First of all, how much (in seconds) is Delta(5/c)? I know how to find > >>>>>> (5m/c), but how much is Delta(5/c)? > >>>>> > >>>>> It is understood that we were talking about 5m. > >>>> > >>>> OK, so 5 m/c = (5 m)/(3E8 m/s) = 1.7E-8 s. > >>>> So what's Delta(5m/c)? > >> > >> Haven't answered this question. What's Delta(5m/c) if (5m/c)=1.7E-8s? > >> > >> It's your equation. Do you know how to use it? What's the number for > >> Delta(5m/c)? > > > > Idiot look up what the word Delta mean in physics. > > > > It means change in. So what's the number for Delta(5m/c)? Idiot....so go and read some books what (5m/c) means. You want me to spoon feed you? That's not going to happen.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 08:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmilhs$1hpj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #387958 |
On 7/18/2016 8:02 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 7:46:59 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 7/17/2016 9:59 PM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 4:36:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 7/17/2016 7:59 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Transit time left to right: >>>>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) >>>>>>>>> Transit time right to left: >>>>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(-5/c)-v(-5)/c^2)) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now a 5th grader can see that both directions gave the same answer for transit time....can you see that?? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Those do NOT give the same answer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> First of all, how much (in seconds) is Delta(5/c)? I know how to find >>>>>>>> (5m/c), but how much is Delta(5/c)? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is understood that we were talking about 5m. >>>>>> >>>>>> OK, so 5 m/c = (5 m)/(3E8 m/s) = 1.7E-8 s. >>>>>> So what's Delta(5m/c)? >>>> >>>> Haven't answered this question. What's Delta(5m/c) if (5m/c)=1.7E-8s? >>>> >>>> It's your equation. Do you know how to use it? What's the number for >>>> Delta(5m/c)? >>> >>> Idiot look up what the word Delta mean in physics. >>> >> >> It means change in. So what's the number for Delta(5m/c)? > > Idiot....so go and read some books what (5m/c) means. > You want me to spoon feed you? That's not going to happen. I know what (5m/c) means. It means 1.7E-8 seconds. But books don't feature the equation Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) They just don't. They feature the equation t' = gamma*( t - vx/c^2 ) That is a Lorentz transformation equation. There is no Delta anywhere in that equation. The Delta is something YOU have added. So since this is YOUR equation, not the equation in books, then YOU have to show how to calculate Delta(5m/c). Now, if you think the equation Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) appears in books and you want me to look for it there, then point to the book that points to that equation. If you can't point to any book, and you can't calculate Delta(5m/c) in your own equation, then you're going to have to admit (at least to yourself) that your "theory" is chocked full of shit. > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 08:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmilsk$1hpj$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #387959 |
On 7/18/2016 8:28 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/18/2016 8:02 AM, kenseto wrote: >> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 7:46:59 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> On 7/17/2016 9:59 PM, kenseto wrote: >>>> On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 4:36:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>> On 7/17/2016 7:59 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Transit time left to right: >>>>>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) >>>>>>>>>> Transit time right to left: >>>>>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(-5/c)-v(-5)/c^2)) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Now a 5th grader can see that both directions gave the same >>>>>>>>>> answer for transit time....can you see that?? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Those do NOT give the same answer. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> First of all, how much (in seconds) is Delta(5/c)? I know how >>>>>>>>> to find >>>>>>>>> (5m/c), but how much is Delta(5/c)? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is understood that we were talking about 5m. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OK, so 5 m/c = (5 m)/(3E8 m/s) = 1.7E-8 s. >>>>>>> So what's Delta(5m/c)? >>>>> >>>>> Haven't answered this question. What's Delta(5m/c) if (5m/c)=1.7E-8s? >>>>> >>>>> It's your equation. Do you know how to use it? What's the number for >>>>> Delta(5m/c)? >>>> >>>> Idiot look up what the word Delta mean in physics. >>>> >>> >>> It means change in. So what's the number for Delta(5m/c)? >> >> Idiot....so go and read some books what (5m/c) means. >> You want me to spoon feed you? That's not going to happen. > > I know what (5m/c) means. It means 1.7E-8 seconds. So that's what (5m/c) evaluates as, in terms of a number. So you tell me, since it's your equation, what Delta(5m/c) is. > But books don't feature the equation > Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) > They just don't. They feature the equation > t' = gamma*( t - vx/c^2 ) > That is a Lorentz transformation equation. > There is no Delta anywhere in that equation. > The Delta is something YOU have added. > So since this is YOUR equation, not the equation in books, then YOU have > to show how to calculate Delta(5m/c). > > Now, if you think the equation > Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) > appears in books and you want me to look for it there, then point to the > book that points to that equation. > > If you can't point to any book, and you can't calculate Delta(5m/c) in > your own equation, then you're going to have to admit (at least to > yourself) that your "theory" is chocked full of shit. > >> > > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 09:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <71fcae51-5e4c-4f0d-9d4d-6a06eaf7fbfb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #387959 |
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:28:31 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/18/2016 8:02 AM, kenseto wrote: > > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 7:46:59 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 7/17/2016 9:59 PM, kenseto wrote: > >>> On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 4:36:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> On 7/17/2016 7:59 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> Transit time left to right: > >>>>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) > >>>>>>>>> Transit time right to left: > >>>>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(-5/c)-v(-5)/c^2)) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Now a 5th grader can see that both directions gave the same answer for transit time....can you see that?? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Those do NOT give the same answer. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> First of all, how much (in seconds) is Delta(5/c)? I know how to find > >>>>>>>> (5m/c), but how much is Delta(5/c)? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It is understood that we were talking about 5m. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> OK, so 5 m/c = (5 m)/(3E8 m/s) = 1.7E-8 s. > >>>>>> So what's Delta(5m/c)? > >>>> > >>>> Haven't answered this question. What's Delta(5m/c) if (5m/c)=1.7E-8s? > >>>> > >>>> It's your equation. Do you know how to use it? What's the number for > >>>> Delta(5m/c)? > >>> > >>> Idiot look up what the word Delta mean in physics. > >>> > >> > >> It means change in. So what's the number for Delta(5m/c)? > > > > Idiot....so go and read some books what (5m/c) means. > > You want me to spoon feed you? That's not going to happen. > > I know what (5m/c) means. It means 1.7E-8 seconds. Fucking idiot.....Delta(5m/c) means an interval of time 1.7E-8 seconds. > But books don't feature the equation > Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) > They just don't. They feature the equation > t' = gamma*( t - vx/c^2 ) > That is a Lorentz transformation equation. > There is no Delta anywhere in that equation. > The Delta is something YOU have added. > So since this is YOUR equation, not the equation in books, then YOU have > to show how to calculate Delta(5m/c). > > Now, if you think the equation > Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) > appears in books and you want me to look for it there, then point to the > book that points to that equation. > > If you can't point to any book, and you can't calculate Delta(5m/c) in > your own equation, then you're going to have to admit (at least to > yourself) that your "theory" is chocked full of shit. > > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 11:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmivbn$3mn$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #387974 |
On 7/18/2016 11:02 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:28:31 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 7/18/2016 8:02 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 7:46:59 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> Haven't answered this question. What's Delta(5m/c) if (5m/c)=1.7E-8s? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's your equation. Do you know how to use it? What's the number for >>>>>> Delta(5m/c)? >>>>> >>>>> Idiot look up what the word Delta mean in physics. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It means change in. So what's the number for Delta(5m/c)? >>> >>> Idiot....so go and read some books what (5m/c) means. >>> You want me to spoon feed you? That's not going to happen. >> >> I know what (5m/c) means. It means 1.7E-8 seconds. > > Fucking idiot.....Delta(5m/c) means an interval of time 1.7E-8 seconds. So Delta(5m/c) = (5m/c)? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 17:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nmj39p$6hp$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #387974 |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:28:31 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 7/18/2016 8:02 AM, kenseto wrote: >> >>>> Haven't answered this question. What's Delta(5m/c) if (5m/c)=1.7E-8s? >> >>>> >> >>>> It's your equation. Do you know how to use it? What's the number for >> >>>> Delta(5m/c)? >> >>> >> >>> Idiot look up what the word Delta mean in physics. >> >> >> >> It means change in. So what's the number for Delta(5m/c)? >> > >> > Idiot....so go and read some books what (5m/c) means. >> > You want me to spoon feed you? That's not going to happen. >> >> I know what (5m/c) means. It means 1.7E-8 seconds. >Fucking idiot.....Delta(5m/c) means an interval of time 1.7E-8 seconds. So it looks like this Delta term you added doesn't add any new information. So why did you add it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 12:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmj3kl$al4$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #387974 |
On 7/18/2016 11:02 AM, kenseto wrote: > Fucking idiot.....Delta(5m/c) means an interval of time 1.7E-8 seconds. But only for left-to-right, correct? Because for a time interval from right-to-left, you write Delta(-5m/c) = -1.7E-8 seconds? What happens if I'm not going left-to-right or right-to-left, but front-to-back? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | paparios <paparios@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 09:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c296c601-77d6-403e-9b77-f585ce198c69@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #387959 |
El lunes, 18 de julio de 2016, 9:28:31 (UTC-4), Odd Bodkin escribió: > On 7/18/2016 8:02 AM, kenseto wrote: > > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 7:46:59 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 7/17/2016 9:59 PM, kenseto wrote: > >>> On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 4:36:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> On 7/17/2016 7:59 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> Transit time left to right: > >>>>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) > >>>>>>>>> Transit time right to left: > >>>>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(-5/c)-v(-5)/c^2)) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Now a 5th grader can see that both directions gave the same answer for transit time....can you see that?? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Those do NOT give the same answer. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> First of all, how much (in seconds) is Delta(5/c)? I know how to find > >>>>>>>> (5m/c), but how much is Delta(5/c)? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It is understood that we were talking about 5m. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> OK, so 5 m/c = (5 m)/(3E8 m/s) = 1.7E-8 s. > >>>>>> So what's Delta(5m/c)? > >>>> > >>>> Haven't answered this question. What's Delta(5m/c) if (5m/c)=1.7E-8s? > >>>> > >>>> It's your equation. Do you know how to use it? What's the number for > >>>> Delta(5m/c)? > >>> > >>> Idiot look up what the word Delta mean in physics. > >>> > >> > >> It means change in. So what's the number for Delta(5m/c)? > > > > Idiot....so go and read some books what (5m/c) means. > > You want me to spoon feed you? That's not going to happen. > > I know what (5m/c) means. It means 1.7E-8 seconds. > But books don't feature the equation > Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) > They just don't. They feature the equation > t' = gamma*( t - vx/c^2 ) > That is a Lorentz transformation equation. > There is no Delta anywhere in that equation. > The Delta is something YOU have added. > So since this is YOUR equation, not the equation in books, then YOU have > to show how to calculate Delta(5m/c). > > Now, if you think the equation > Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) > appears in books and you want me to look for it there, then point to the > book that points to that equation. > > If you can't point to any book, and you can't calculate Delta(5m/c) in > your own equation, then you're going to have to admit (at least to > yourself) that your "theory" is chocked full of shit. > > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables The only Lorentzian relation which uses differentials is the following, used in the transformation of velocities (see Landau and Lifshitz): dx=gamma(dx'+vdt') dt=gamma(dt'+(v/c^2)dx') with gamma= 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 10:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <64556fcf-f2bb-4de3-a8fc-94dd6043a04e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #387959 |
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:28:31 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/18/2016 8:02 AM, kenseto wrote: > > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 7:46:59 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 7/17/2016 9:59 PM, kenseto wrote: > >>> On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 4:36:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>> On 7/17/2016 7:59 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>> Transit time left to right: > >>>>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) > >>>>>>>>> Transit time right to left: > >>>>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(-5/c)-v(-5)/c^2)) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Now a 5th grader can see that both directions gave the same answer for transit time....can you see that?? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Those do NOT give the same answer. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> First of all, how much (in seconds) is Delta(5/c)? I know how to find > >>>>>>>> (5m/c), but how much is Delta(5/c)? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It is understood that we were talking about 5m. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> OK, so 5 m/c = (5 m)/(3E8 m/s) = 1.7E-8 s. > >>>>>> So what's Delta(5m/c)? > >>>> > >>>> Haven't answered this question. What's Delta(5m/c) if (5m/c)=1.7E-8s? > >>>> > >>>> It's your equation. Do you know how to use it? What's the number for > >>>> Delta(5m/c)? > >>> > >>> Idiot look up what the word Delta mean in physics. > >>> > >> > >> It means change in. So what's the number for Delta(5m/c)? > > > > Idiot....so go and read some books what (5m/c) means. > > You want me to spoon feed you? That's not going to happen. > > I know what (5m/c) means. It means 1.7E-8 seconds. So 1.7E-8 second is a delta interval of time. > But books don't feature the equation > Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2))x Yes it does.....read the text book Holliday and Resnick > They just don't. They feature the equation > t' = gamma*( t - vx/c^2 ) > That is a Lorentz transformation equation. > There is no Delta anywhere in that equation. > The Delta is something YOU have added. > So since this is YOUR equation, not the equation in books, then YOU have > to show how to calculate Delta(5m/c). Fucking idiot why does Delta(5m/c) need to be calculated? It is an interval time of 5m/c. Gee you are stupid. > > Now, if you think the equation > Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) > appears in books and you want me to look for it there, then point to the > book that points to that equation. > > If you can't point to any book, and you can't calculate Delta(5m/c) in > your own equation, then you're going to have to admit (at least to > yourself) that your "theory" is chocked full of shit. > > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 12:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmj4i4$cp7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #387988 |
On 7/18/2016 12:41 PM, kenseto wrote: > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:28:31 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 7/18/2016 8:02 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 7:46:59 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 7/17/2016 9:59 PM, kenseto wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 4:36:30 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> On 7/17/2016 7:59 AM, kenseto wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Transit time left to right: >>>>>>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) >>>>>>>>>>> Transit time right to left: >>>>>>>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(-5/c)-v(-5)/c^2)) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Now a 5th grader can see that both directions gave the same answer for transit time....can you see that?? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Those do NOT give the same answer. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> First of all, how much (in seconds) is Delta(5/c)? I know how to find >>>>>>>>>> (5m/c), but how much is Delta(5/c)? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is understood that we were talking about 5m. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> OK, so 5 m/c = (5 m)/(3E8 m/s) = 1.7E-8 s. >>>>>>>> So what's Delta(5m/c)? >>>>>> >>>>>> Haven't answered this question. What's Delta(5m/c) if (5m/c)=1.7E-8s? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's your equation. Do you know how to use it? What's the number for >>>>>> Delta(5m/c)? >>>>> >>>>> Idiot look up what the word Delta mean in physics. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It means change in. So what's the number for Delta(5m/c)? >>> >>> Idiot....so go and read some books what (5m/c) means. >>> You want me to spoon feed you? That's not going to happen. >> >> I know what (5m/c) means. It means 1.7E-8 seconds. > > So 1.7E-8 second is a delta interval of time. So there's no difference in your mind between (5m/c), which you say is a delta interval of time, and Delta(5m/c), which you say means exactly the same thing. So why write the Delta? So we'll go back to the original and REAL Lorentz transformation equation which reads t' = gamma(t-vx/c^2) and you're once again saying that t and x are INTERVALS of time and space and not positions? > >> But books don't feature the equation >> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2))x > > Yes it does.....read the text book Holliday and Resnick > >> They just don't. They feature the equation >> t' = gamma*( t - vx/c^2 ) >> That is a Lorentz transformation equation. >> There is no Delta anywhere in that equation. >> The Delta is something YOU have added. >> So since this is YOUR equation, not the equation in books, then YOU have >> to show how to calculate Delta(5m/c). > > Fucking idiot why does Delta(5m/c) need to be calculated? It is an interval time of 5m/c. Gee you are stupid. >> >> Now, if you think the equation >> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2)) >> appears in books and you want me to look for it there, then point to the >> book that points to that equation. >> >> If you can't point to any book, and you can't calculate Delta(5m/c) in >> your own equation, then you're going to have to admit (at least to >> yourself) that your "theory" is chocked full of shit. >> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 12:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmj4kv$cp7$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #387988 |
On 7/18/2016 12:41 PM, kenseto wrote: >> But books don't feature the equation >> > Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2))x > Yes it does.....read the text book Holliday and Resnick > I have that book. It's not in there. Care to cite the chapter and section where this equation appears? Be careful here, Ken. I don't want you to say something you THINK you REMEMBER. You should CHECK first before spluttering something that isn't true. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 12:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmj52a$dd0$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #387990 |
On 7/18/2016 12:46 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/18/2016 12:41 PM, kenseto wrote: >>> But books don't feature the equation >>> > Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2))x >> Yes it does.....read the text book Holliday and Resnick >> > > I have that book. It's not in there. Care to cite the chapter and > section where this equation appears? > > Be careful here, Ken. I don't want you to say something you THINK you > REMEMBER. You should CHECK first before spluttering something that isn't > true. > As an example of something you THINK you remember but don't really remember, it may interest you that the author listing is not Holliday and Resnick. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 11:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b1491105-ae17-40bf-873f-c551acee0324@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #387992 |
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:53:17 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/18/2016 12:46 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > On 7/18/2016 12:41 PM, kenseto wrote: > >>> But books don't feature the equation > >>> > Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2))x > >> Yes it does.....read the text book Holliday and Resnick > >> > > > > I have that book. It's not in there. Care to cite the chapter and > > section where this equation appears? > > > > Be careful here, Ken. I don't want you to say something you THINK you > > REMEMBER. You should CHECK first before spluttering something that isn't > > true. > > > > As an example of something you THINK you remember but don't really > remember, it may interest you that the author listing is not Holliday > and Resnick. Look in the chapter on relativity.....I don't want to give you the page number because I want you to waste time looking it up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 13:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmj78o$goi$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #387995 |
On 7/18/2016 1:21 PM, kenseto wrote: > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:53:17 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 7/18/2016 12:46 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> On 7/18/2016 12:41 PM, kenseto wrote: >>>>> But books don't feature the equation >>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2))x >>>> Yes it does.....read the text book Holliday and Resnick >>>> >>> >>> I have that book. It's not in there. Care to cite the chapter and >>> section where this equation appears? >>> >>> Be careful here, Ken. I don't want you to say something you THINK you >>> REMEMBER. You should CHECK first before spluttering something that isn't >>> true. >>> >> >> As an example of something you THINK you remember but don't really >> remember, it may interest you that the author listing is not Holliday >> and Resnick. > > Look in the chapter on relativity.....I don't want to give you the page number > because I want you to waste time looking it up. > It didn't take long, Ken. As I said, I have the book, and I just flipped through the whole chapter and didn't find the equation you say was there. So far, all you've made is a lie that made me take a whole 90 seconds to flip through the chapter to see if it's there. So do you get a sense of satisfaction in lying to get me to spend 90 seconds looking for something that isn't there? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 07:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <66004751-12a8-49c2-823c-5f6c24df5a94@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #387997 |
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 2:30:52 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 7/18/2016 1:21 PM, kenseto wrote: > > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:53:17 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 7/18/2016 12:46 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> On 7/18/2016 12:41 PM, kenseto wrote: > >>>>> But books don't feature the equation > >>>>>> Delta(T')=gamma((Delta(5/c)-v*5/c^2))x > >>>> Yes it does.....read the text book Holliday and Resnick > >>>> > >>> > >>> I have that book. It's not in there. Care to cite the chapter and > >>> section where this equation appears? > >>> > >>> Be careful here, Ken. I don't want you to say something you THINK you > >>> REMEMBER. You should CHECK first before spluttering something that isn't > >>> true. > >>> > >> > >> As an example of something you THINK you remember but don't really > >> remember, it may interest you that the author listing is not Holliday > >> and Resnick. > > > > Look in the chapter on relativity.....I don't want to give you the page number > > because I want you to waste time looking it up. > > > > It didn't take long, Ken. As I said, I have the book, and I just flipped > through the whole chapter and didn't find the equation you say was > there. So far, all you've made is a lie that made me take a whole 90 > seconds to flip through the chapter to see if it's there. So do you get > a sense of satisfaction in lying to get me to spend 90 seconds looking > for something that isn't there? Idiot....it's there. You didn't see it because you only took 90 seconds trying to find it. It is in a table called "The Lorentz Transformation Equations." > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 12:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nmj4s8$dd0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #387988 |
On 7/18/2016 12:41 PM, kenseto wrote: > Fucking idiot why does Delta(5m/c) need to be calculated? It is an interval time of 5m/c. Gee you are stupid. Ken, if there were a reason to write it down as Delta(5m/c) instead of just (5m/c), it would come out with a different number. But you say it's the same thing. Here, I'll give you an example. Suppose you were climbing a set of stairs from the second story to the third story. When you started on the second story, your elevation h above street level is 3.5 m. When you end up on the third story, your elevation h above street level is now 7.2 m. What is Delta(h) here? Is it 3.5 m? Is it 7.2 m? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web