Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #380248 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-27 04:16 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-04-14 05:15 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 457 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-27 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-27 04:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-27 16:37 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-27 13:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-27 23:36 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 16:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 04:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 13:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 16:56 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 04:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:19 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 10:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:31 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Dreamer In Colore <dreamerincolore@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-04-08 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-10 16:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-11 00:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-12 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 08:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 16:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-13 20:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-10 22:01 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:09 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-06 19:40 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:51 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:49 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:29 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:32 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:54 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 08:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 13:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:25 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 14:33 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Chrysi Cat <chrysicat@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-04-06 15:26 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-28 17:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-29 04:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-28 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-28 18:52 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-29 14:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-30 05:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-30 11:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-03-30 09:50 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 03:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-03-31 15:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 20:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-01 15:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-01 23:17 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-01 17:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-01 22:44 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-02 06:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-02 12:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 19:32 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:07 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 00:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-04 18:20 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-05 00:23 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-05 18:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-08 17:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-09 19:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:26 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Ted Street <ted.smasher@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 14:38 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-31 17:30 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-03-31 17:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-01 16:32 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-01 23:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 04:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:39 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-02 09:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 16:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-02 23:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-02 21:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-02 22:17 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-02 23:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-03 00:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-02 23:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Apollo <nowhere@def.com> - 2016-04-03 03:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-03 05:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-03 17:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-03 11:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-02 07:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-02 11:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-03 08:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-03 17:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-04 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-04 15:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 08:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-05 15:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-06 11:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-07 04:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-07 12:09 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-08 04:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-08 13:51 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-09 04:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-09 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 05:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 09:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-10 15:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-10 14:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 05:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-11 16:28 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-11 18:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-12 07:49 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-13 10:23 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-13 14:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-13 16:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-13 17:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-04-14 05:09 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-14 11:42 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:58 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-21 12:51 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-14 12:41 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> - 2016-04-14 13:55 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:53 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:34 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-14 15:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-15 09:50 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-15 11:32 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> - 2016-04-17 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-17 17:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-21 15:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-21 22:19 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-21 19:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-04-24 12:53 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> - 2016-04-24 13:54 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-24 23:06 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 08:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-25 09:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-26 14:42 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-27 15:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 14:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-27 18:47 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-27 18:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 03:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-28 15:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-28 08:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? A Nony Mouse <abc@cef.ghi> - 2016-04-28 10:07 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-28 10:09 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 10:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 14:32 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:07 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:25 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 16:37 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-04-29 14:45 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:06 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-04-28 11:53 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 11:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 14:30 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 13:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 16:12 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:41 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 21:35 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-28 23:51 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 16:05 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:13 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-28 15:44 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:10 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-28 14:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-28 19:36 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 03:39 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2016-04-29 00:45 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-29 05:56 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-29 07:02 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-29 08:24 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-04-29 12:07 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-29 13:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:58 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-29 20:11 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-29 13:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-29 12:31 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:36 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 13:11 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-01 13:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-29 15:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-26 16:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? bilgat@m.nu - 2016-04-28 08:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 11:25 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-28 11:27 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-28 11:39 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-29 13:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-04-29 14:40 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-30 09:11 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:01 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-03 11:55 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-03 11:38 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-03 12:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-03 16:45 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-03 19:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 15:59 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-03 23:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 16:00 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-05 19:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-07 07:45 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-07 16:15 +0200
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jane <Jane@....> - 2016-05-08 06:52 +1000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-07 15:44 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-07 14:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-07 17:33 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-07 17:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:31 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:22 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:50 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:20 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:27 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:05 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:14 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Mitchell Holman <noemail@comcast.net> - 2016-05-17 07:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-17 23:21 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-18 03:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 11:26 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 12:46 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 21:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 11:59 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 17:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:41 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-21 18:44 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-22 07:55 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-22 17:12 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-23 15:47 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-23 22:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-24 14:03 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-24 15:15 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-25 15:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-26 04:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-24 18:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-24 14:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-24 15:16 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-25 15:56 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-26 04:31 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:27 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 21:35 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 12:00 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-18 16:01 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 17:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:12 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-18 16:08 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 18:40 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:33 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-19 17:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 03:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:13 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:34 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 00:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 12:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-20 11:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:01 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:42 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-21 18:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-22 07:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:35 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-22 17:14 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-23 15:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-23 22:45 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-24 14:04 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-24 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-25 15:58 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-26 04:29 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-18 15:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 16:08 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-05-18 15:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> - 2016-05-18 15:57 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:37 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-30 17:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-01 09:57 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-01 16:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-03 12:48 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-03 22:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-04 16:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-05 19:43 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-07 07:46 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 00:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-07 18:06 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-08 16:42 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-08 11:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-09 01:09 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-05-09 13:41 +1000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-09 05:02 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-05-08 17:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:08 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:23 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:24 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:21 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:08 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:42 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:31 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:15 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:44 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-11 14:07 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 00:27 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-12 08:25 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-12 18:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-13 17:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-14 02:23 +0000
(no, he doesnt) (yes, he does) BANG BANG The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:43 -0700
Santa The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 11:51 -0700
Re: Santa The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 13:29 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-16 22:11 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:40 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-17 16:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 15:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-18 15:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:57 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-18 15:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 01:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:16 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-20 18:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-21 07:43 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-18 14:14 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-19 19:46 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-19 16:38 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-20 00:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-20 12:18 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-05-21 17:47 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-22 10:36 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-14 03:29 -0400
Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheist have fishy eyes. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-14 10:58 -0700
Re: Atheists have eyes. Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> - 2016-05-14 12:55 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-15 16:17 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-15 19:00 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-16 13:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-05-17 02:43 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-05-17 06:41 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? JimmyJohn <Non@Jtheist.net> - 2016-05-01 10:14 -0600
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-01 15:34 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-28 19:18 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 18:39 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 21:07 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-13 21:22 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 12:01 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:16 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:52 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:26 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 12:49 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? MattB <trdell12345@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:12 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2016-04-14 11:50 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-04-14 23:39 +0000
Re: [OT] Re: Is there a God, Yes or No? Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2016-04-14 05:15 -0400
Page 10 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 23 Next page →
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 18:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <u2aogbtuiqd4u88bnblhm9h98o40lblj0d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #381382 |
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:28:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <5n5ogbdlpb7l432dsil246ilv50nlf80eo@4ax.com> wrote: >On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:19:14 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:40:04 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><10blgb9unm390ak3v30oiiu8r0ejvctli3@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:02:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:27:31 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>><ckokgbh2qch0p5mvrro7fej7fqigcua223@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:35:27 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 07:58:02 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>><o1vhgbp7k018asnl7aio3hqt5muim0cl0m@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:50:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:51:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>><vcvfgbhnhrh8b03e2utjk4j33n5g7m4a97@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:16:11 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:09:21 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>><f15dgbhkcg0r8jp1gmofbg1kivrbqhoupb@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:54:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:37:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>><npeagblhkusn5lp5jvd813l7rsgmfn29ft@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:11:39 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:35:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>><jnf7gbl3b5torpaf4ja55t8ltkeabcq2e5@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:20:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:56 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><mac5gb5onur06rkkcgdok9qesal55pmfud@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:19:17 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:40:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><2a72gbpltm6pgs1v71a3phv7q9ckf4ok7r@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 11:06:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><u9fvfbtpat6m9mm9gc1ve0h8cq79pmdedp@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 23:27:27 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:32:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><s6qtfb1pueel5llf85k8292kv5b43ggvsr@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>for your support of murdering the human unborn. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>As I haves said many times, threats based upon your superstitions mean >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nothing to me. No matter how many times you repeat them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are not threats. They are promises from God. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Since no one has ever provided any evidence that any god ever existed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>they are obviously nothing more than the usual empty threats and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>should be ignored. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have. And you sure can't show me I'm wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have no interest in showing you right or wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But I am interested in trying to help you avoid the hellfires. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I still have seen no evidence they even exist. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Light a match and put it under your wrist. Then you'll know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I freely admit combustion occurs. It is this often mentioned but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>elusive hellfire I question. It apparently is another name for what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is used to light a cigarette and is available in paper packets of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>twenty or so in many places. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In hell, you don't need to bring your own matches. After all, YOU.......are the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fuel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>More threats from your superstition. That seems to be quite common. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>The threats clearly mean no superstition is in works. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Of course a superstition is involved. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Then name it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In your case it calls itself christian. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Yes, those of us born again into Christianity. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Just another run-of-the-mill superstition. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I've gotten past my fears. You're still on the wrong side to discontinue worry. >>>>>>> >>>>>>What? Me worry? >>>>> >>>>>Just giving you a heads up. It's still your funeral. >>>>> >>>> >>>>We have been there several times. >>> >>>Yep, and you final status is getting closer to the end. > >>True, I am older every day. Why do you mention the obvious as if it >>means something? > >You're that much closer to the flames. > I do intend to be cremated, remember? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 07:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #381400 |
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:43:16 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:28:24 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><5n5ogbdlpb7l432dsil246ilv50nlf80eo@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:19:14 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:40:04 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>alt.atheism with message-id >>><10blgb9unm390ak3v30oiiu8r0ejvctli3@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 15:02:09 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 09:27:31 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>><ckokgbh2qch0p5mvrro7fej7fqigcua223@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 05:35:27 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 07:58:02 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>><o1vhgbp7k018asnl7aio3hqt5muim0cl0m@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 04:50:19 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:51:32 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>><vcvfgbhnhrh8b03e2utjk4j33n5g7m4a97@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 04:16:11 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:09:21 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>><f15dgbhkcg0r8jp1gmofbg1kivrbqhoupb@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 04:54:10 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 11:37:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>><npeagblhkusn5lp5jvd813l7rsgmfn29ft@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:11:39 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:35:40 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>><jnf7gbl3b5torpaf4ja55t8ltkeabcq2e5@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:20:01 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:24:56 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><mac5gb5onur06rkkcgdok9qesal55pmfud@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:19:17 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:40:57 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><2a72gbpltm6pgs1v71a3phv7q9ckf4ok7r@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 11:06:50 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:38:42 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><u9fvfbtpat6m9mm9gc1ve0h8cq79pmdedp@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 23:27:27 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:32:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><s6qtfb1pueel5llf85k8292kv5b43ggvsr@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You actually have the most damning of them all - that you won't be judged by God >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>for your support of murdering the human unborn. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>As I haves said many times, threats based upon your superstitions mean >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nothing to me. No matter how many times you repeat them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are not threats. They are promises from God. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Since no one has ever provided any evidence that any god ever existed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>they are obviously nothing more than the usual empty threats and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>should be ignored. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have. And you sure can't show me I'm wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have no interest in showing you right or wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>But I am interested in trying to help you avoid the hellfires. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I still have seen no evidence they even exist. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Light a match and put it under your wrist. Then you'll know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I freely admit combustion occurs. It is this often mentioned but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>elusive hellfire I question. It apparently is another name for what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is used to light a cigarette and is available in paper packets of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>twenty or so in many places. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In hell, you don't need to bring your own matches. After all, YOU.......are the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fuel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>More threats from your superstition. That seems to be quite common. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>The threats clearly mean no superstition is in works. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Of course a superstition is involved. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Then name it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>In your case it calls itself christian. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Yes, those of us born again into Christianity. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Just another run-of-the-mill superstition. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I've gotten past my fears. You're still on the wrong side to discontinue worry. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>What? Me worry? >>>>>> >>>>>>Just giving you a heads up. It's still your funeral. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>We have been there several times. >>>> >>>>Yep, and you final status is getting closer to the end. >> >>>True, I am older every day. Why do you mention the obvious as if it >>>means something? >> >>You're that much closer to the flames. >> > >I do intend to be cremated, remember? That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 10:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4jlsgb1cfvrfkkr924f31cn1nf3uo5o57t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #381433 |
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: >>>You're that much closer to the flames. >>> >> >>I do intend to be cremated, remember? > >That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. More superstition-based threats. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 14:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8v7tgbd0ut9n5jocf2rmp7cdga9407a5u2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #381512 |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>You're that much closer to the flames. >>>> >>> >>>I do intend to be cremated, remember? >> >>That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. > >More superstition-based threats. Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't win. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 16:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nem9or$uet$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #381538 |
On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>> alt.atheism with message-id
>> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> You're that much closer to the flames.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember?
>>>
>>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist.
>>
>> More superstition-based threats.
>
> Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't win.
You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the
guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects
of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should
anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same
problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it).
Besides, it's not "God". It's "Zod". Kneel!
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.livejournal.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 17:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pilgrim2-C9A524.17151613042016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #381544 |
In article <nem9or$uet$2@dont-email.me>, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: > On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >> alt.atheism with message-id > >> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: > >> > >>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? > >>> > >>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. > >> > >> More superstition-based threats. > > > > Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't > > win. > > You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the > guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects > of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should > anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same > problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). > AGREED. So what is YOUR interpretation? Here is the text: "God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life" (John 3 KJV) This is the English of the 1600s. What is he saying? -- http://www.olypen.com/gerrit/index.php
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 05:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-10C78C.05093014042016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #381567 |
In article <pilgrim2-C9A524.17151613042016@news.giganews.com>, Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> wrote: > In article <nem9or$uet$2@dont-email.me>, > "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: > > > On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > > > > > >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > > >> alt.atheism with message-id > > >> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? > > >>> > > >>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. > > >> > > >> More superstition-based threats. > > > > > > Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't > > > win. > > > > You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the > > guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects > > of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should > > anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same > > problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). > > > AGREED. So what is YOUR interpretation? Here is the text: "God so > loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever > believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life" (John 3 > KJV) This is the English of the 1600s. What is he saying? Nothing that means a damned thing in the real world. -- JD "If ANYONE will not welcome you or listen to your words, LEAVE that home or town and shake the dust off your feet." Matthew 10:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 11:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <neodom$ll5$1@panix2.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #381567 |
In article <pilgrim2-C9A524.17151613042016@news.giganews.com>, Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> said: > AGREED. So what is YOUR interpretation? Here is the text: "God so > loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever > believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life" (John 3 > KJV) This is the English of the 1600s. What is he saying? Basically, "I'm God, and I approved this propaganda piece." -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 15:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pilgrim2-090FD6.15583714042016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #381651 |
In article <neodom$ll5$1@panix2.panix.com>, wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote: > In article <pilgrim2-C9A524.17151613042016@news.giganews.com>, > Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> said: > > > AGREED. So what is YOUR interpretation? Here is the text: "God so > > loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever > > believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life" (John 3 > > KJV) This is the English of the 1600s. What is he saying? > > Basically, "I'm God, and I approved this propaganda piece." > > -- wds REJECTED. I have a good sense of humor but we were being serious. The verity of the 66 books of the Bible is the most important truth on the planet. If God was joking or for any reason does not do what he says I am SOL and you are too. > "The Word of God is quick and powerful and sharper than any two-edged sword piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit and of the joints and marrow and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart." (Heb 4:12 KJV) Jimbo -- http://www.olypen.com/gerrit/index.php
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-21 15:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nfb9p0$8cj$1@panix2.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #381692 |
In article <pilgrim2-090FD6.15583714042016@news.giganews.com>, Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> said: > REJECTED. I have a good sense of humor but we were being serious. > The verity of the 66 books of the Bible is the most important > truth on the planet. No, it might be the most important *question* on the planet (though probably not since Islam's numerical advantage should make "Are all the sections of the Koran true?" more important) but calling it a truth is just a tad arbitrary. > If God was joking or for any reason does not do what he says I am > SOL and you are too. Not as much trouble as we're in if he's telling the truth. Based on his own documentation the man's a malignant narcissist with infinite power. I can understand worshipping him out of sheer pants-wetting terror at not being on his good side, but how can anybody *love* that asshole? (Aside from Stockholm Syndrome, anyway.) -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-21 12:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f8d172ee-51d3-472c-a201-b5234ca93bcf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #382053 |
On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 1:30:42 PM UTC-6, William December Starr wrote: > > Not as much trouble as we're in if he's telling the truth. Based > on his own documentation the man's a malignant narcissist with > infinite power. I can understand worshipping him out of sheer > pants-wetting terror at not being on his good side, but how can > anybody *love* that asshole? (Aside from Stockholm Syndrome, > anyway.) > > -- wds It seems to me that there has been a significant shift in the view of God from Old Testament days to the present. The New Testament seems to be mostly about love whereas the OT message was geared for a crowd of barbarians. So I think your view applies only if you are a barbarian :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 12:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #381567 |
On 4/13/16 8:15 PM, Kaptain Krunch wrote:
> In article <nem9or$uet$2@dont-email.me>,
> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote:
>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>> alt.atheism with message-id
>>>> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> You're that much closer to the flames.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist.
>>>>
>>>> More superstition-based threats.
>>>
>>> Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't
>>> win.
>>
>> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the
>> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects
>> of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should
>> anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same
>> problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it).
>>
> AGREED. So what is YOUR interpretation? Here is the text: "God so
> loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever
> believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life" (John 3
> KJV) This is the English of the 1600s. What is he saying?
>
Well, that's a 1600s interpretation of a text that was probably written
in what, Greek or Latin, and that was translated from another language
(Aramaic?). So I'm not sure that it's even coming close to the original
meaning. If *I* were reading that, my question would be "then where are
all these immortal people that should be around?", since anyone who
believed in Jesus and his God should be still alive.
Note that my personal view is that of someone raised with no awareness
of active religion until I was in my very late teens or early 20s, so
that as far as I'm concerned there's no difference between the Bible and
my D'Aulaire's Greek Myths or Grimm's Fairy Tales. They're stories
people told that had significance to them, but exactly how they
connected with anything real is often unknown, and sometimes unknowable.
If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, they'll have
to show me directly, because they made sure I was raised in a way that
made just believing in them without evidence (and old books without
scientific backing aren't evidence) impossible.
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.livejournal.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 13:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1i7s3lhajloa0.m1lk11n803j$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #381661 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:41:19 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote in<news:neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me> in alt.atheism,rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astronomy: > On 4/13/16 8:15 PM, Kaptain Krunch wrote: >> In article <nem9or$uet$2@dont-email.me>, >> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: >>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >>>>> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? >>>>>> >>>>>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. >>>>> >>>>> More superstition-based threats. >>>> >>>> Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't >>>> win. >>> >>> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the >>> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects >>> of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should >>> anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same >>> problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). >>> >> AGREED. So what is YOUR interpretation? Here is the >> text: "God so loved the world that he gave his only >> begotten son that whosoever believeth in him should not >> perish but have everlasting life" (John 3 KJV) This is >> the English of the 1600s. Actually, in the authorized edition of 1611 it reads: ¶ For God so loued þe world, that he gaue his only begotten Sonne: that whosoeuer beleeueth in him, should not perish, but haue euerlasting life. And this was already slightly archaic compared with the early 17th century vernacular language. >> What is he saying? > Well, that's a 1600s interpretation of a text that was > probably written in what, Greek or Latin, and that was > translated from another language (Aramaic?). It was written in Greek. The best guess is that it was written around the year 100 CE, give or take a decade. It was an original composition. It drew on a variety of sources, including Greek philosophical tradition. [...] Brian -- It was the neap tide, when the baga venture out of their holes to root for sandtatties. The waves whispered rhythmically over the packed sand: haggisss, haggisss, haggisss.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 15:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pilgrim2-8ED343.15531014042016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #381668 |
In article <1i7s3lhajloa0.m1lk11n803j$.dlg@40tude.net>, "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:41:19 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. > Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote > in<news:neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me> in > alt.atheism,rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astrono > my: > > > On 4/13/16 8:15 PM, Kaptain Krunch wrote: > >> In article <nem9or$uet$2@dont-email.me>, > >> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. > >>>>> > >>>>> More superstition-based threats. > >>>> > >>>> Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you > >>>> can't > >>>> win. > >>> > >>> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the > >>> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects > >>> of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should > >>> anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same > >>> problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). > >>> > > >> AGREED. So what is YOUR interpretation? Here is the > >> text: "God so loved the world that he gave his only > >> begotten son that whosoever believeth in him should not > >> perish but have everlasting life" (John 3 KJV) This is > >> the English of the 1600s. > > Actually, in the authorized edition of 1611 it reads: > > ś For God so loued ţe world, that he gaue his only > begotten Sonne: that whosoeuer beleeueth in him, > should not perish, but haue euerlasting life. > > And this was already slightly archaic compared with the > early 17th century vernacular language. > > >> What is he saying? > > > Well, that's a 1600s interpretation of a text that was > > probably written in what, Greek or Latin, and that was > > translated from another language (Aramaic?). > > It was written in Greek. The best guess is that it was > written around the year 100 CE, give or take a decade. It > was an original composition. It drew on a variety of > sources, including Greek philosophical tradition. > > [...] > > Brian NOT ENOUGH. AS I asked the other poster. What does the text say? How do you interpret the passage? Both of you are ignoring the message because you are pricked in your heart and convinced of the verity of the Bible. -- http://www.olypen.com/gerrit/index.php
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Smiler <smiler@jo.king> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 23:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nep9dm$ct2$8@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #381691 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:53:10 -0700, Kaptain Krunch wrote: > In article <1i7s3lhajloa0.m1lk11n803j$.dlg@40tude.net>, > "Brian M. Scott" <b.scott@csuohio.edu> wrote: > >> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:41:19 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. >> Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote >> in<news:neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me> in >> alt.atheism,rec.arts.sf.written,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.astrono >> my: >> >> > On 4/13/16 8:15 PM, Kaptain Krunch wrote: >> >> In article <nem9or$uet$2@dont-email.me>, >> >> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: >> >>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >> >>>>> alt.atheism with message-id >> >>>>> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> More superstition-based threats. >> >>>> >> >>>> Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and >> >>>> you can't win. >> >>> >> >>> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are >> >>> the >> >>> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many >> >>> sects of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why >> >>> should anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The >> >>> Bible" -- same problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations >> >>> of it). >> >>> >> >>> >> >> AGREED. So what is YOUR interpretation? Here is the text: "God so >> >> loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever >> >> believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life" (John >> >> 3 KJV) This is the English of the 1600s. >> >> Actually, in the authorized edition of 1611 it reads: >> >> ¶ For God so loued þe world, that he gaue his only begotten Sonne: >> that whosoeuer beleeueth in him, should not perish, but haue >> euerlasting life. >> >> And this was already slightly archaic compared with the early 17th >> century vernacular language. >> >> >> What is he saying? >> >> > Well, that's a 1600s interpretation of a text that was probably >> > written in what, Greek or Latin, and that was translated from another >> > language (Aramaic?). >> >> It was written in Greek. The best guess is that it was written around >> the year 100 CE, give or take a decade. It was an original >> composition. It drew on a variety of sources, including Greek >> philosophical tradition. >> >> [...] >> >> Brian > NOT ENOUGH. AS I asked the other poster. What does the text say? Who gives a flying fuck what a fairy tale says? > How do you interpret the passage? Why would anyone sane want to interpret a passage in a fairy tale? > Both of you are ignoring the message because It's bullshit. > you are pricked in your heart and convinced of the verity of the > Bible. Your prick is attached to your head, dickhead. -- Smiler, The godless one. aa #2279 Gods are all tailored to order. They are made to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-21 15:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nfbbce$jf6$1@panix2.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #381691 |
In article <pilgrim2-8ED343.15531014042016@news.giganews.com>, Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> said: > NOT ENOUGH. AS I asked the other poster. What does the text say? > How do you interpret the passage? Both of you are ignoring the > message because you are pricked in your heart and convinced of the > verity of the Bible. If we don't have reason to believe that the message came from some supernatural entity that we should be worried about, then figuring out what it _means_ is just an academic exercise on the same order as arguing Kirk vs. Picard. Except that Star Trek was at least occasionally *interesting*, while your holy book is mostly just a bad read. -- wds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 15:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pilgrim2-668ADA.15464314042016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #381661 |
In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: > On 4/13/16 8:15 PM, Kaptain Krunch wrote: > > In article <nem9or$uet$2@dont-email.me>, > > "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: > > > >> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: > >>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? > >>>>> > >>>>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. > >>>> > >>>> More superstition-based threats. > >>> > >>> Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't > >>> win. > >> > >> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the > >> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects > >> of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should > >> anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same > >> problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). > >> > > AGREED. So what is YOUR interpretation? Here is the text: "God so > > loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever > > believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life" (John 3 > > KJV) This is the English of the 1600s. What is he saying? > > > > Well, that's a 1600s interpretation of a text that was probably written > in what, Greek or Latin, and that was translated from another language > (Aramaic?). So I'm not sure that it's even coming close to the original > meaning. If *I* were reading that, my question would be "then where are > all these immortal people that should be around?", since anyone who > believed in Jesus and his God should be still alive. > > > Note that my personal view is that of someone raised with no awareness > of active religion until I was in my very late teens or early 20s, so > that as far as I'm concerned there's no difference between the Bible and > my D'Aulaire's Greek Myths or Grimm's Fairy Tales. They're stories > people told that had significance to them, but exactly how they > connected with anything real is often unknown, and sometimes unknowable. > > If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, they'll have > to show me directly, because they made sure I was raised in a way that > made just believing in them without evidence (and old books without > scientific backing aren't evidence) impossible. > NOT ENOUGH You stated <sic>so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). I ask again WHAT IS YOUR INTERPRETATION? (John 3:16 above) Jimbo -- http://www.olypen.com/gerrit/index.php
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 09:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <neqrdo$git$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #381689 |
On 4/14/16 6:46 PM, Kaptain Krunch wrote:
> In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>,
> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/13/16 8:15 PM, Kaptain Krunch wrote:
>>> In article <nem9or$uet$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in
>>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're that much closer to the flames.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> More superstition-based threats.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you can't
>>>>> win.
>>>>
>>>> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the
>>>> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects
>>>> of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should
>>>> anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same
>>>> problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it).
>>>>
>>> AGREED. So what is YOUR interpretation? Here is the text: "God so
>>> loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever
>>> believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life" (John 3
>>> KJV) This is the English of the 1600s. What is he saying?
>>>
>>
>> Well, that's a 1600s interpretation of a text that was probably written
>> in what, Greek or Latin, and that was translated from another language
>> (Aramaic?). So I'm not sure that it's even coming close to the original
>> meaning. If *I* were reading that, my question would be "then where are
>> all these immortal people that should be around?", since anyone who
>> believed in Jesus and his God should be still alive.
>>
>>
>> Note that my personal view is that of someone raised with no awareness
>> of active religion until I was in my very late teens or early 20s, so
>> that as far as I'm concerned there's no difference between the Bible and
>> my D'Aulaire's Greek Myths or Grimm's Fairy Tales. They're stories
>> people told that had significance to them, but exactly how they
>> connected with anything real is often unknown, and sometimes unknowable.
>>
>> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, they'll have
>> to show me directly, because they made sure I was raised in a way that
>> made just believing in them without evidence (and old books without
>> scientific backing aren't evidence) impossible.
>>
> NOT ENOUGH You stated <sic>so many Bible versions and interpretations of
> it). I ask again WHAT IS YOUR INTERPRETATION? (John 3:16 above)
> Jimbo
>
I did, if you read above. My interpretation would be "Believe in this
guy and you will be immortal". Which leads me to the question of where
all those immortal people are, since surely SOME people must have
believed in the two thousand years or so since.
--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.livejournal.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 11:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0342297d-7b00-4d84-9a70-1576660d0240@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #381731 |
On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 7:51:00 AM UTC-6, Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor) wrote: > > ... Which leads me to the question of where all those immortal people are, > since surely SOME people must have believed in the two thousand years or > so since. > > -- > Sea Wasp Maybe they're living among us now. Have you checked out your neighbors' stats? Are they REALLY as young as they appear to be? Have they ever been in a near-fatal accident, yet survived? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0217869/ Yep, they're just waiting until the earth turns into a sea of glass and then take over. Remember, "the meek shall inherit the earth" And how about other "earths"? Have they gone through this same process? Presumably, they would need vast amounts of energy: http://news.discovery.com/space/alien-life-exoplanets/has-kepler-discovered-an-alien-megastructure-151014.htm http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.04606 Gary, the only sane one in this thread
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-17 12:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pilgrim2-92C078.12122117042016@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #381731 |
In article <neqrdo$git$1@dont-email.me>, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: > On 4/14/16 6:46 PM, Kaptain Krunch wrote: > > In article <neoh16$3km$1@dont-email.me>, > > "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: > > > >> On 4/13/16 8:15 PM, Kaptain Krunch wrote: > >>> In article <nem9or$uet$2@dont-email.me>, > >>> "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 4/13/16 3:37 PM, duke wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:23:51 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:49:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in > >>>>>> alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>> <9krpgb58m1ga8ll49355p4d2qm6ab33329@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> You're that much closer to the flames. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I do intend to be cremated, remember? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> That's just short-term precooking for the atheist. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> More superstition-based threats. > >>>>> > >>>>> Well, yes, I'm easy. You're going to have to deal with God and you > >>>>> can't > >>>>> win. > >>>> > >>>> You assume that not only does God exist, but that you actually are the > >>>> guy with the right interpretation of what he wants. Given how many sects > >>>> of Christianity alone, let alone other religions, exist, why should > >>>> anyone believe that you've got it right? (don't say "The Bible" -- same > >>>> problem, so many Bible versions and interpretations of it). > >>>> > >>> AGREED. So what is YOUR interpretation? Here is the text: "God so > >>> loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever > >>> believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life" (John 3 > >>> KJV) This is the English of the 1600s. What is he saying? > >>> > >> > >> Well, that's a 1600s interpretation of a text that was probably written > >> in what, Greek or Latin, and that was translated from another language > >> (Aramaic?). So I'm not sure that it's even coming close to the original > >> meaning. If *I* were reading that, my question would be "then where are > >> all these immortal people that should be around?", since anyone who > >> believed in Jesus and his God should be still alive. > >> > >> > >> Note that my personal view is that of someone raised with no awareness > >> of active religion until I was in my very late teens or early 20s, so > >> that as far as I'm concerned there's no difference between the Bible and > >> my D'Aulaire's Greek Myths or Grimm's Fairy Tales. They're stories > >> people told that had significance to them, but exactly how they > >> connected with anything real is often unknown, and sometimes unknowable. > >> > >> If God gives a crap about whether I believe in Him/Her/It, they'll have > >> to show me directly, because they made sure I was raised in a way that > >> made just believing in them without evidence (and old books without > >> scientific backing aren't evidence) impossible. > >> > > NOT ENOUGH You stated <sic>so many Bible versions and interpretations of > > it). I ask again WHAT IS YOUR INTERPRETATION? (John 3:16 above) > > Jimbo > > > > > I did, if you read above. My interpretation would be "Believe in this > guy and you will be immortal". Which leads me to the question of where > all those immortal people are, since surely SOME people must have > believed in the two thousand years or so since. > AGREED (your interpretation) although it is a little rough. Jimbo -- http://www.olypen.com/gerrit/index.php
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 23 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web