Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #377895 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-04 09:40 -0800 |
| Last post | 2016-03-23 23:42 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 444 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-04 09:40 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-05 07:46 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 01:15 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 17:31 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-05 20:01 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-05 20:08 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 12:46 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 12:55 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 06:42 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 14:56 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 06:40 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-06 15:44 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 06:50 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 15:00 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 07:10 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 15:18 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 07:25 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 15:35 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 07:38 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 15:48 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 07:56 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-06 20:29 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 07:28 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 15:39 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 08:06 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 16:14 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 08:26 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 17:01 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-03-06 19:24 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 22:03 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-03-16 00:37 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 04:25 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-03-16 04:32 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Comhghall Parthalan <compart@draggonpart.org> - 2016-03-16 16:40 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Comhghall Parthalan <compart@draggonpart.org> - 2016-03-16 16:39 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 09:57 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 10:49 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Comhghall Parthalan <compart@draggonpart.org> - 2016-03-16 18:03 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 11:07 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 11:32 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-03-06 12:38 -0600
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 19:08 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 11:19 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 11:12 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 11:22 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 19:35 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 11:48 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 11:49 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 12:13 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 21:10 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 23:24 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 15:07 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 07:18 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 07:30 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 15:51 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 07:57 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 16:09 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 08:15 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 16:32 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 08:38 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 16:46 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 08:51 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:09 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 08:21 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 16:27 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 08:33 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 16:39 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 08:44 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 16:49 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 08:56 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 17:02 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 09:13 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 17:20 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 09:27 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 17:31 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:28 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya François Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-07 20:53 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 09:08 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 17:12 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 09:09 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 17:14 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:23 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya François Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-07 20:56 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:50 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya François Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-07 22:18 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:21 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya François Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-07 20:57 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 11:07 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 09:18 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 21:25 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 21:38 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 22:58 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 23:10 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 23:42 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 23:49 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 00:05 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 00:16 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya François Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-08 15:30 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 22:51 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 23:22 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 00:00 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 00:12 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya François Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-08 15:31 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 07:37 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya François Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-08 15:41 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya François Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-08 15:42 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 07:51 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya François Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-08 18:07 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 10:11 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya François Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-08 18:32 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 10:52 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Francois Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-08 19:15 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 11:49 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 12:06 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 12:27 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Francois Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-08 20:43 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 13:35 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 14:13 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 14:43 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 22:51 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 23:06 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 23:13 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 23:28 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 23:40 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 23:53 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 00:01 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-09 00:40 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-03-09 10:14 -0600
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-11 08:27 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 10:33 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-11 11:28 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 11:58 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 12:48 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-11 13:04 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 13:48 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 21:54 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-11 14:11 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 14:27 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 22:33 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 14:50 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 22:56 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 15:17 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 23:21 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 16:54 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-12 09:00 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 17:19 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 21:07 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 22:49 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Iephthae Sparrow <yvosp@gideoncloud.net> - 2016-03-13 13:29 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-13 07:59 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Iephthae Sparrow <yvosp@gideoncloud.net> - 2016-03-13 16:17 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-13 09:24 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Iephthae Sparrow <yvosp@gideoncloud.net> - 2016-03-13 16:32 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Iephthae Sparrow <yvosp@gideoncloud.net> - 2016-03-13 16:55 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-13 10:07 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Iephthae Sparrow <yvosp@gideoncloud.net> - 2016-03-13 17:56 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 12:42 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Iephthae Sparrow <yvosp@gideoncloud.net> - 2016-03-13 19:59 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 19:10 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 22:56 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 23:13 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 23:26 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 00:14 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Iephthae Sparrow <yvosp@gideoncloud.net> - 2016-03-14 17:49 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-14 10:58 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 12:16 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Comhghall Parthalan <compart@draggonpart.org> - 2016-03-14 21:03 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-14 14:47 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 15:05 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Comhghall Parthalan <compart@draggonpart.org> - 2016-03-14 22:29 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 17:07 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-14 17:57 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 22:02 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 22:27 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 00:18 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:09 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 11:21 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 12:04 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Comhghall Parthalan <compart@draggonpart.org> - 2016-03-15 19:13 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 12:28 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Comhghall Parthalan <compart@draggonpart.org> - 2016-03-15 19:50 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 13:18 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Comhghall Parthalan <compart@draggonpart.org> - 2016-03-15 20:24 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 12:18 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Comhghall Parthalan <compart@draggonpart.org> - 2016-03-15 19:45 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 14:37 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Comhghall Parthalan <compart@draggonpart.org> - 2016-03-15 21:53 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 14:56 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Comhghall Parthalan <compart@draggonpart.org> - 2016-03-15 22:02 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 15:28 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-03-15 23:58 -0500
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 22:59 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 23:12 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 23:48 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 00:31 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 09:56 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 10:21 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 11:19 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 12:47 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 13:28 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 14:19 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 14:33 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 14:35 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 14:51 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 16:07 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 16:36 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 22:48 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 14:40 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 15:48 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 08:53 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-15 20:30 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Comhghall Parthalan <compart@draggonpart.org> - 2016-03-15 19:51 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 12:41 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 13:06 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-13 16:51 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 22:41 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-14 00:33 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 22:22 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 00:25 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 01:06 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 01:17 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 01:25 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 09:46 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 09:50 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 10:12 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 10:09 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 22:22 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 23:02 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-13 07:56 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-03-13 13:43 -0500
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 13:13 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 22:28 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 23:06 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 15:23 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 17:01 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 17:54 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 19:03 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 22:17 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-12 06:34 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 14:03 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-11 14:14 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 22:28 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 14:38 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 22:42 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 15:04 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 23:15 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 15:19 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 23:24 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 15:21 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Luigi Durante <luigdu@jaccappo.org> - 2016-03-11 23:34 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya François Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-08 15:29 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 08:30 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 21:15 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 15:04 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 07:23 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 15:32 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 15:33 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 07:50 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 16:04 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 16:05 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-03-07 13:14 -0600
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya François Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-07 21:05 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:51 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya François Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-07 22:17 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 18:52 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-03-08 11:21 -0600
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 13:41 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Francois Theobaldus <fraop@sshimown.org> - 2016-03-08 21:48 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 13:56 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 16:32 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya jstaredits@gmail.com - 2016-03-08 16:44 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 22:17 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 22:35 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-08 22:46 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 19:42 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 21:22 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 15:12 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 14:49 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 08:22 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 08:41 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 09:08 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 09:14 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 09:28 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 17:33 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 09:33 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 10:22 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 10:44 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 11:03 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 11:31 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 17:08 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 19:28 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 19:38 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-06 19:44 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-07 15:28 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-07 07:29 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya jstaredits@gmail.com - 2016-03-08 16:10 -0800
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-13 08:26 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Iephthae Sparrow <yvosp@gideoncloud.net> - 2016-03-13 22:05 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-14 01:29 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-14 01:35 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-14 05:56 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 15:17 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 22:47 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-17 03:46 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-17 03:58 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-17 04:50 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 09:57 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-17 10:17 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Dewydd Hrodland <dewdhr@wisecommodities.org> - 2016-03-17 17:22 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-17 10:44 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Dewydd Hrodland <dewdhr@wisecommodities.org> - 2016-03-17 18:12 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 11:25 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Dewydd Hrodland <dewdhr@wisecommodities.org> - 2016-03-17 18:48 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 12:15 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Dewydd Hrodland <dewdhr@wisecommodities.org> - 2016-03-17 20:51 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 14:15 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Cesare Pancratius <cesarepanc@porphyriocontext.org> - 2016-03-19 13:19 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-17 11:34 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 22:30 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-18 05:31 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-18 05:35 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:46 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-19 12:00 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-20 05:47 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-20 05:55 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya cryptoclearance <cryptoclearance@cryptoclearance.net> - 2016-03-20 14:13 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-20 11:23 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-03-18 23:03 -0500
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 00:16 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-19 12:07 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 11:20 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-21 20:23 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 12:40 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-21 20:46 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 12:47 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-21 21:12 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 13:16 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-21 21:33 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 14:12 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-21 22:20 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 15:33 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-03-22 00:26 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 11:15 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-22 19:32 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 11:36 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-22 19:40 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 13:17 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 12:31 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-21 20:48 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 12:53 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-21 19:59 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 13:05 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-21 20:15 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-21 21:13 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 13:18 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-21 19:51 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 13:04 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-21 20:17 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 13:26 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-21 21:44 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 13:56 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-21 21:00 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 14:24 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-21 20:20 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 13:26 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-21 20:33 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 13:40 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 14:11 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-21 21:25 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 14:36 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 15:37 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-21 23:18 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 21:10 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-22 17:17 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 21:40 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-22 17:04 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-22 10:24 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-22 17:33 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-22 10:40 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-22 17:50 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 11:28 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 13:26 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 13:32 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 12:47 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 13:05 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-22 04:06 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-03-22 04:19 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-22 04:25 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-03-22 04:52 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 05:22 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-03-22 05:29 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 05:46 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-03-22 06:13 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 06:24 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-03-22 06:47 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 07:27 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-03-22 07:44 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 08:04 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-03-22 08:18 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-22 08:31 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 09:18 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-22 18:24 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-22 10:30 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-22 17:41 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-22 10:52 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-22 19:01 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-22 11:11 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-22 19:25 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 11:34 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-22 19:38 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 11:43 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-22 11:56 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-22 20:41 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-22 12:59 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-22 21:45 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-22 14:25 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-22 18:15 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-22 11:34 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 11:20 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-22 19:35 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 11:37 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-22 19:45 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 12:54 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Omar Shabsigh <omar.shabsigh@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 04:53 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-23 05:21 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-23 13:04 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-23 06:23 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-23 14:14 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-23 07:34 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-23 14:41 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-23 07:51 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-23 14:55 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-23 09:38 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-23 17:07 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 13:48 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya bear making dust <bear@bearmakingdust.net> - 2016-03-23 17:08 +0000
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 10:30 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-23 19:22 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 13:54 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-23 22:53 +0100
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 15:25 -0700
Re: Koobee Vs Vaidya Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-03-23 23:42 +0100
Page 3 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 23 Next page →
| From | Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 12:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <fOudncx0mYeW5EHLnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #378010 |
On 3/6/16 3/6/16 8:50 AM, David Waite wrote:
> ds²=dct'²-dr²-r²dθ²-r²sin²θdφ²-{(2GM/rc²)-[kG(q/rc²)²]+(λr²/3)}(dr±dct')² So
> you're saying you can meet the challenge and prove me a hypocrite, If you are
> so sure that you know anything about relativity tell me what for this
> spacetime do you get for g^µ_ν?
That is a fine challenge: One that knowledgeable people can answer with no
effort at all, but the idiots and fools around here haven't a clue about.
To Koobee Wublee: This is a basic question about the metric components in GR; I
can answer it as fast as I can write it down (which certainly tells David that I
know the correct answer) -- why is it impossible for you?
Tom Roberts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 19:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nbhv7m$13s9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #378058 |
Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 3/6/16 3/6/16 8:50 AM, David Waite wrote:
>> ds²=dct'²-dr²-r²dθ²-r²sin²θdφ²-{(2GM/rc²)-[kG(q/rc²)²]+(λr²/3)}(dr
±dct')²
>> So you're saying you can meet the challenge and prove me a hypocrite,
>> If you are so sure that you know anything about relativity tell me what
>> for this spacetime do you get for g^µ_ν?
>
> That is a fine challenge: One that knowledgeable people can answer with
> no effort at all, but the idiots and fools around here haven't a clue
> about.
>
> To Koobee Wublee: This is a basic question about the metric components
> in GR; I can answer it as fast as I can write it down (which certainly
> tells David that I know the correct answer) -- why is it impossible for
> you?
Me too, I can write the answer immediately, but I don't, in which case the
others will see it and proclaim it as their own. This must suffice and
prove I already know the answer.
It is a trick question, mr Koobee, don't fall for it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 11:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9c6a81a5-3d77-4565-b390-e503416b7dd1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378064 |
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 12:08:42 PM UTC-7, Helene Swanhild wrote:
> Tom Roberts wrote:
>
> > On 3/6/16 3/6/16 8:50 AM, David Waite wrote:
> >> ds²=dct'²-dr²-r²dθ²-r²sin²θdφ²-{(2GM/rc²)-[kG(q/rc²)²]+(λr²/3)}(dr
> ±dct')²
> >> So you're saying you can meet the challenge and prove me a hypocrite,
> >> If you are so sure that you know anything about relativity tell me what
> >> for this spacetime do you get for g^µ_ν?
> >
> > That is a fine challenge: One that knowledgeable people can answer with
> > no effort at all, but the idiots and fools around here haven't a clue
> > about.
> >
> > To Koobee Wublee: This is a basic question about the metric components
> > in GR; I can answer it as fast as I can write it down (which certainly
> > tells David that I know the correct answer) -- why is it impossible for
> > you?
>
> Me too, I can write the answer immediately, but I don't, in which case the
> others will see it and proclaim it as their own. This must suffice and
> prove I already know the answer.
>
> It is a trick question, mr Koobee, don't fall for it.
Except everyone including myself believes Tom knows it, but not you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 11:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2cefd958-c3ef-4a06-9d34-1f283c650728@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378058 |
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 10:38:05 AM UTC-8, tjrob137 wrote:
> On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 9:40:04 AM UTC-8, David Waite wrote:
> > ds²=dct'²-dr²-r²dθ²-r²sin²θdφ²-{(2GM/rc²)-[kG(q/rc²)²]+(λr²/3)}(dr±dct')²
>
> > where M is any function of u
> > u=r±ct'
> > λ=0, q=0 is the Vaidya solution.
Who is Vaidya? <shrug>
> > λ=0, M=constant is the Reissner-Nordstrom solution.
Wrong. <shrug>
> > M=0, q=0 is the DeSitter solution.
Wrong again. <shrug>
> > λ=0, q=0, M=constant is the Schwarzschild solution.
Wrong as usual. <shrug>
> That is a fine challenge: One that knowledgeable people can answer with no
> effort at all, but the idiots and fools around here haven't a clue about.
This is no challenge but a silly grade school kids play. It is like “Hey, I can hold my breath for 2 minutes. Can you?” farce. Koobee Wublee is deeply surprised that Tom would allow itself to sink such low. <shrug>
> To Koobee Wublee: This is a basic question about the metric components in GR; I
> can answer it as fast as I can write it down (which certainly tells David that I
> know the correct answer) -- why is it impossible for you?
Tom is an idiot. The challenge lies in laying out all these differential equations that solutions can be solved not Waite’s or Jan’s silly farce. <shrug>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 11:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <512e13e6-515d-4a2a-8f8f-b4bb08c25c48@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378065 |
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 12:12:19 PM UTC-7, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 10:38:05 AM UTC-8, tjrob137 wrote:
> > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 9:40:04 AM UTC-8, David Waite wrote:
>
> > > ds²=dct'²-dr²-r²dθ²-r²sin²θdφ²-{(2GM/rc²)-[kG(q/rc²)²]+(λr²/3)}(dr±dct')²
> >
> > > where M is any function of u
> > > u=r±ct'
> > > λ=0, q=0 is the Vaidya solution.
>
> Who is Vaidya? ...
So not only did you fail the challenge, proving you'r a crank that doesn't know squat about relativity, but you don't even know of someone who found something so much more profound than what Hawking did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 19:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nbi0q8$174s$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #378069 |
David Waite wrote: >> Who is Vaidya? ... > > So not only did you fail the challenge, proving you'r a crank that > doesn't know squat about relativity, but you don't even know of someone > who found something so much more profound than what Hawking did. Why ain't you posting a link to it, to begin with, so we can solve all your questions faster than you do. Please remark that Tom did not say he knows a Vaidya. This Vaidya might be stronger than Einstein??
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 11:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b71b9f44-ecab-44de-951f-c58f8284eb6e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378072 |
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 12:35:40 PM UTC-7, Helene Swanhild wrote: > David Waite wrote: > > >> Who is Vaidya? ... > > > > So not only did you fail the challenge, proving you'r a crank that > > doesn't know squat about relativity, but you don't even know of someone > > who found something so much more profound than what Hawking did. > > Why ain't you posting a link to it, to begin with, so we can solve all > your questions faster than you do. > > Please remark that Tom did not say he knows a Vaidya. This Vaidya might be > stronger than Einstein?? Tom said he knows the answer. I believe him. Tom probably knows of Vaidya too, at least as far as I know. The story behind why I used that spacetime is because several years ago I worked out this exact solution to Einstein's field equations for myself, before even hearing about the Vaidya solution. I posted the λ=0 case of it. Koobee rambled anti-relativity sillyness against it. And then I later learned about the already known Vaidya solution. I recently posted here again. Koobee grumbled about me sometime in the past referring to a solution where M was a function of u, and so I used this spacetime for the example.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 11:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e1e231ad-8588-434f-913f-3b4026fc0161@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378072 |
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 12:35:40 PM UTC-7, Helene Swanhild wrote: > David Waite wrote: > > >> Who is Vaidya? ... > > > > So not only did you fail the challenge, proving you'r a crank that > > doesn't know squat about relativity, but you don't even know of someone > > who found something so much more profound than what Hawking did. > > Why ain't you posting a link to it, to begin with, so we can solve all > your questions faster than you do. Ok, http://www.modernrelativitysite.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 12:13 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <fea28884-4f29-4d70-883b-77c307093b67@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378075 |
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 12:49:26 PM UTC-7, David Waite wrote: > On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 12:35:40 PM UTC-7, Helene Swanhild wrote: > > David Waite wrote: > > > > >> Who is Vaidya? ... > > > > > > So not only did you fail the challenge, proving you'r a crank that > > > doesn't know squat about relativity, but you don't even know of someone > > > who found something so much more profound than what Hawking did. > > > > Why ain't you posting a link to it, to begin with, so we can solve all > > your questions faster than you do. > > Ok, http://www.modernrelativitysite.com/ The answer I suppose I should reveal at this time, g^µ_ν = δ^µ_ν of course, that answers probably over Koobees head as well. Anyway the funny part is that this is the answer for ANY spacetime of general relativity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 21:10 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <420fc21c-0b08-4f62-81fc-5003d9d460d9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378077 |
David Waite wrote:
> ds²=dct'²-dr²-r²dθ²-r²sin²θdφ²-{(2GM/rc²)-[kG(q/rc²)²]+(λr²/3)}(dr±dct')²
>
> The answer I suppose I should reveal at this time,
> g^µ_ν = δ^µ_ν
You certainly do not know what you are talking about. Your garbage metric cannot fall back into the Schwarzschild metric. You are another snake oil salesman. Your only hope is to convince the Einstein dingleberries of your bedazzled mathemagics show. The Einstein dingleberries know no better. They are eager to embrace any dickhead that would proliferate their religion of relativity. <shrug>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-06 23:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b683f3b4-856e-4edd-a1d2-91db0ddbd623@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378098 |
On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 9:10:02 PM UTC-8, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> David Waite wrote:
>
> > ds²=dct'²-dr²-r²dθ²-r²sin²θdφ²-{(2GM/rc²)-[kG(q/rc²)²]+(λr²/3)}(dr±dct')²
> >
> > The answer I suppose I should reveal at this time,
> > g^µ_ν = δ^µ_ν
>
> You certainly do not know what you are talking about. Your garbage metric cannot fall back into the Schwarzschild metric. You are another snake oil salesman. Your only hope is to convince the Einstein dingleberries of your bedazzled mathemagics show. The Einstein dingleberries know no better. They are eager to embrace any dickhead that would proliferate their religion of relativity. <shrug>
Koobee, get real. g^a_b = delta^a_b Always.
--
Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 15:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nbk5f3$19h4$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #378102 |
JanPB wrote:
> On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 9:10:02 PM UTC-8, Koobee Wublee wrote:
>> David Waite wrote:
>>
>> > ds²=dct'²-dr²-r²dθ²-r²sin²θdφ²-{(2GM/rc²)-[kG(q/rc²)²]+(λr²/3)}(dr
±dct')²
>> >
>> > The answer I suppose I should reveal at this time,
>> > g^µ_ν = δ^µ_ν
>>
>> You certainly do not know what you are talking about. Your garbage
>> metric cannot fall back into the Schwarzschild metric. You are another
>> snake oil salesman. Your only hope is to convince the Einstein
>> dingleberries of your bedazzled mathemagics show. The Einstein
>> dingleberries know no better. They are eager to embrace any dickhead
>> that would proliferate their religion of relativity. <shrug>
>
> Koobee, get real. g^a_b = delta^a_b Always.
What do you mean by get real. Mr Koobee is perfectly right, your g^a_b =
delta^a_b is the stupidest thing ever written symbolically.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 07:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ed4c8b71-3989-470e-816a-6697824c7fc9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378133 |
On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 8:07:19 AM UTC-7, Helene Swanhild wrote:
> JanPB wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 9:10:02 PM UTC-8, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> >> David Waite wrote:
> >>
> >> > ds²=dct'²-dr²-r²dθ²-r²sin²θdφ²-{(2GM/rc²)-[kG(q/rc²)²]+(λr²/3)}(dr
> ±dct')²
> >> >
> >> > The answer I suppose I should reveal at this time,
> >> > g^µ_ν = δ^µ_ν
> >>
> >> You certainly do not know what you are talking about. Your garbage
> >> metric cannot fall back into the Schwarzschild metric. You are another
> >> snake oil salesman. Your only hope is to convince the Einstein
> >> dingleberries of your bedazzled mathemagics show. The Einstein
> >> dingleberries know no better. They are eager to embrace any dickhead
> >> that would proliferate their religion of relativity. <shrug>
> >
> > Koobee, get real. g^a_b = delta^a_b Always.
>
> What do you mean by get real. Mr Koobee is perfectly right, your g^a_b =
> delta^a_b is the stupidest thing ever written symbolically.
So in short its over your head as well as Koobee's. I'll state it in more remedial terms, which will probably still be over your head. Expressed as a 2x2 matrix, it is identity, for any of general relativity's spacetimes, that is to say quadratic, and anyone who knows anything about general relativity, knows this by heart. Koobee didn't. He's a poser crank.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 07:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3bac9b8f-9f40-431b-acab-43fd9ab414e1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378138 |
On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 8:18:50 AM UTC-7, David Waite wrote:
> On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 8:07:19 AM UTC-7, Helene Swanhild wrote:
> > JanPB wrote:
> >
> > > On Sunday, March 6, 2016 at 9:10:02 PM UTC-8, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> > >> David Waite wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > ds²=dct'²-dr²-r²dθ²-r²sin²θdφ²-{(2GM/rc²)-[kG(q/rc²)²]+(λr²/3)}(dr
> > ±dct')²
> > >> >
> > >> > The answer I suppose I should reveal at this time,
> > >> > g^µ_ν = δ^µ_ν
> > >>
> > >> You certainly do not know what you are talking about. Your garbage
> > >> metric cannot fall back into the Schwarzschild metric. You are another
> > >> snake oil salesman. Your only hope is to convince the Einstein
> > >> dingleberries of your bedazzled mathemagics show. The Einstein
> > >> dingleberries know no better. They are eager to embrace any dickhead
> > >> that would proliferate their religion of relativity. <shrug>
> > >
> > > Koobee, get real. g^a_b = delta^a_b Always.
> >
> > What do you mean by get real. Mr Koobee is perfectly right, your g^a_b =
> > delta^a_b is the stupidest thing ever written symbolically.
>
> So in short its over your head as well as Koobee's. I'll state it in more remedial terms, which will probably still be over your head. Expressed as a 2x2 matrix, it is identity, for any of general relativity's spacetimes, that is to say quadratic, and anyone who knows anything about general relativity, knows this by heart. Koobee didn't. He's a poser crank.
Correction 4x4. Don't drink and post.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 15:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nbk81p$1fnt$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #378145 |
David Waite wrote: >> So in short its over your head as well as Koobee's. I'll state it in >> more remedial terms, which will probably still be over your head. >> Expressed as a 2x2 matrix, it is identity, for any of general >> relativity's spacetimes, that is to say quadratic, and anyone who knows >> anything about general relativity, knows this by heart. Koobee didn't. >> He's a poser crank. > > Correction 4x4. Don't drink and post. You probably mean 4x4x4x4 to be exact in Relativity, which gives 256 (2⁸) equations. Yes, Einstine was the defacto father of the computing systems, math modelling and scientific computation. I am the first to say it, but the "binary" is embedded deep into the fabric of spacetime, also known as cosmos, Aether (the proof of spacetime having a structure), and the fabric of this Universe.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 07:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63e3e312-3f23-47c4-8e60-c2efc4316212@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378149 |
On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 8:51:25 AM UTC-7, Helene Swanhild wrote: > David Waite wrote: > > >> So in short its over your head as well as Koobee's. I'll state it in > >> more remedial terms, which will probably still be over your head. > >> Expressed as a 2x2 matrix, it is identity, for any of general > >> relativity's spacetimes, that is to say quadratic, and anyone who knows > >> anything about general relativity, knows this by heart. Koobee didn't. > >> He's a poser crank. > > > > Correction 4x4. Don't drink and post. > > You probably mean 4x4x4x4 to be exact in Relativity, which gives 256 (2⁸) No crackpot, two indexes, 4x4. As a matrix its the 4x4 identity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 16:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nbk94h$1h7q$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #378150 |
David Waite wrote: > On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 8:51:25 AM UTC-7, Helene Swanhild wrote: >> David Waite wrote: >> >> >> So in short its over your head as well as Koobee's. I'll state it in >> >> more remedial terms, which will probably still be over your head. >> >> Expressed as a 2x2 matrix, it is identity, for any of general >> >> relativity's spacetimes, that is to say quadratic, and anyone who >> >> knows anything about general relativity, knows this by heart. Koobee >> >> didn't. He's a poser crank. >> > >> > Correction 4x4. Don't drink and post. >> >> You probably mean 4x4x4x4 to be exact in Relativity, which gives 256 >> (2⁸) > > No crackpot, two indexes, 4x4. As a matrix its the 4x4 identity. You dont even know there are 256 equations in Relativity?? Crackpot? I rather delay the reading of your papers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 08:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <15af9f8b-a975-40f2-affb-058227247f3c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378153 |
On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 9:09:57 AM UTC-7, Helene Swanhild wrote: > David Waite wrote: > > > On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 8:51:25 AM UTC-7, Helene Swanhild wrote: > >> David Waite wrote: > >> > >> >> So in short its over your head as well as Koobee's. I'll state Post Discard it in > >> >> more remedial terms, which will probably still be over your head. > >> >> Expressed as a 2x2 matrix, it is identity, for any of general > >> >> relativity's spacetimes, that is to say quadratic, and anyone who > >> >> knows anything about general relativity, knows this by heart. Koobee > >> >> didn't. He's a poser crank. > >> > > >> > Correction 4x4. Don't drink and post. > >> > >> You probably mean 4x4x4x4 to be exact in Relativity, which gives 256 > >> (2⁸) > > > > No crackpot, two indexes, 4x4. As a matrix its the 4x4 identity. > > You dont even know there are 256 equations in Relativity?? Crackpot? I > rather delay the reading of your papers. Idiot, there's only two indexes in this not 4. Its 4x4. Fvcking get an education or shut up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 16:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nbkaeb$1js4$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #378154 |
David Waite wrote: >> >> > Correction 4x4. Don't drink and post. >> >> >> >> You probably mean 4x4x4x4 to be exact in Relativity, which gives 256 >> >> (2⁸) >> > >> > No crackpot, two indexes, 4x4. As a matrix its the 4x4 identity. >> >> You dont even know there are 256 equations in Relativity?? Crackpot? I >> rather delay the reading of your papers. > > Idiot, there's only two indexes in this not 4. Its 4x4. Fvcking get an > education or shut up. What do you mean by "get an education"?? I have already too much education. That's why you are calling it a tensor, since it descends from 4x4x4x4. If it really were to be a 4x4 it will be no need for Tensors. Man, I am so disappointed about you. Another wannabe physicist, not knowing his Tensors. http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/american-prime-minister-poroshenko-offers-victoria-nuland-offer-she-cant-refuse/ri13216
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-07 08:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0e9f5103-40ca-453e-86d5-f27446e63abb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #378160 |
On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 9:32:15 AM UTC-7, Helene Swanhild wrote: > David Waite wrote: > > >> >> > Correction 4x4. Don't drink and post. > >> >> > >> >> You probably mean 4x4x4x4 to be exact in Relativity, which gives 256 > >> >> (2⁸) > >> > > >> > No crackpot, two indexes, 4x4. As a matrix its the 4x4 identity. > >> > >> You dont even know there are 256 equations in Relativity?? Crackpot? I > >> rather delay the reading of your papers. > > > > Idiot, there's only two indexes in this not 4. Its 4x4. Fvcking get an > > education or shut up. > > What do you mean by "get an education"?? I mean who the hell do you think you are to be making such crank assertions about a field you obviously know nothing about, moron. A two index tensor has 4x4 elements, idiot. And no you wouldn't have to read "later" an about 4 line proof if you had any education in the matter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 23 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 23 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web