Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #373634 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-10 17:42 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-01-18 22:30 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 177 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-10 17:42 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 15:36 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-11 08:41 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-01-11 13:58 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-11 18:34 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-11 11:17 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Carmine Portacio <carpo@trilogybearing.org> - 2016-01-11 21:41 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-12 09:17 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-12 09:33 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-12 05:28 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-01-12 15:04 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:53 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-12 08:37 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-12 08:49 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 11:06 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-12 18:25 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 12:37 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-12 18:44 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 12:46 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-12 16:38 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 17:30 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-12 17:37 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-12 17:40 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 23:17 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-13 05:08 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-13 09:43 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 10:17 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-13 18:40 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-13 12:02 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-14 08:39 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-14 10:25 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-12 22:07 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-12 22:12 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-13 18:53 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-13 11:17 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 13:17 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-14 08:43 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 04:35 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-14 04:52 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 05:02 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-14 05:11 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 06:04 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-14 06:17 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 07:35 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-14 06:57 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 09:36 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-15 07:12 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-16 07:31 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 15:39 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-18 03:21 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-18 07:22 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 13:25 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-14 21:48 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Carmine Portacio <carpo@trilogybearing.org> - 2016-01-14 21:52 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-15 07:17 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-15 21:33 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Carmine Portacio <carpo@trilogybearing.org> - 2016-01-15 21:58 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-16 21:07 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-17 05:59 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-17 18:58 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-18 07:03 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 13:23 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-19 05:20 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 09:49 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-20 05:52 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 09:25 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-21 05:47 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 08:13 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-22 06:22 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:56 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-23 14:55 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 08:55 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-22 06:33 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. PD <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 15:52 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 21:22 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 09:07 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-25 09:55 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-25 17:32 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-25 12:49 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-25 20:36 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 17:15 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-25 22:40 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 22:42 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:11 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 15:57 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 07:08 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 17:15 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:16 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 16:08 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 07:17 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-28 11:25 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Juan Sebastián <jseb@montserrat.info> - 2016-01-28 17:55 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Juan Sebastián <jseb@montserrat.info> - 2016-01-28 18:04 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-28 18:38 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-01-29 11:48 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Juan Sebastián <jseb@montserrat.info> - 2016-01-29 10:53 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 10:31 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 13:22 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-28 19:40 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 07:39 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 16:11 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-24 23:10 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-25 07:03 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 11:03 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-26 06:02 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 08:14 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-21 14:27 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-18 21:56 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 09:21 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 11:18 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-14 20:43 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-14 19:41 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-14 19:46 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Carmine Portacio <carpo@trilogybearing.org> - 2016-01-14 19:11 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-14 21:16 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-14 21:57 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Carmine Portacio <carpo@trilogybearing.org> - 2016-01-14 22:12 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 14:27 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-14 23:30 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-15 21:43 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-15 23:32 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-16 21:12 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-16 14:28 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-17 01:47 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-17 10:09 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-17 06:53 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-17 19:09 +0000
The speed of light (was: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29.) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-17 21:12 +0100
Re: The speed of light Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-17 14:51 -0600
Re: The speed of light (was: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29.) Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-18 22:02 +0000
Re: The speed of light (was: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29.) Carmine Portacio <carpo@trilogybearing.org> - 2016-01-18 22:14 +0000
Re: The speed of light (was: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29.) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-19 22:25 +0100
Re: The speed of light (was: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29.) mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-20 06:10 -0800
Re: The speed of light (was: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29.) Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-20 17:22 +0000
Re: The speed of light (was: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29.) Lawrence Senreich <lawest@galaxyredeems.org> - 2016-01-20 17:26 +0000
Re: The speed of light Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-21 02:32 +0100
Re: The speed of light Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-21 09:39 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-17 14:40 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-17 22:10 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 14:05 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Carmine Portacio <carpo@trilogybearing.org> - 2016-01-17 22:35 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 09:14 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-18 22:28 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 18:58 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-19 05:33 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-19 05:48 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-19 06:20 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-19 06:30 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-19 06:39 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 09:46 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 09:44 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-19 21:31 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 17:23 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 00:05 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-20 17:44 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-20 19:46 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 23:44 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-18 22:17 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 14:23 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-20 15:02 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 13:12 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-20 22:34 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 13:40 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-01-20 23:16 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-21 10:04 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-21 05:08 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 09:26 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 11:40 -0600
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-01-21 18:52 +0100
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-11 05:04 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 13:12 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-12 09:19 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 20:39 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-01-14 20:50 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-15 21:46 +0000
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-01-17 11:17 -0800
Re: The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-18 22:30 +0000
Page 1 of 9 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-10 17:42 +0000 |
| Subject | The Stupidity of Einstein, Chapter 29. |
| Message-ID | <n6u55f$430$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
No I haven't died...just too busy lately. Here's something to remind you of my presence. What would any mathematician think of this general identity? T = fn(L/T), where T and L are nothing in particular. I think he would laugh his head off.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-10 15:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c54f649b-c391-4d3d-a9f5-8109c13ddbd1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #373634 |
On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 9:42:11 AM UTC-8, Henry Wilson wrote: > No I haven't died...just too busy lately. Here's something to remind you > of my presence. > > What would any mathematician think of this general identity? > > T = fn(L/T), where T and L are nothing in particular. > > I think he would laugh his head off. Not enough information. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 08:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n6vpsa$1of0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #373648 |
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:36:17 -0800, JanPB wrote: > On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 9:42:11 AM UTC-8, Henry Wilson wrote: >> No I haven't died...just too busy lately. Here's something to remind >> you of my presence. >> >> What would any mathematician think of this general identity? >> >> T = fn(L/T), where T and L are nothing in particular. >> >> I think he would laugh his head off. > > Not enough information. Not enough for an idiot. Time is a function of itself according to Einstein.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 13:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n708ug$s1$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #373670 |
On 11.01.2016 09:41, Henry Wilson wrote: > > T = fn(L/T), where T and L are nothing in particular. means: > Time is a function of itself. Well done, Ralph! :-D -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 18:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n70sk2$1tds$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #373675 |
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:58:49 +0100, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > On 11.01.2016 09:41, Henry Wilson wrote: >> >> T = fn(L/T), where T and L are nothing in particular. > > means: > >> Time is a function of itself. > > Well done, Henry! :-D No I cannot take the credit for that. It was Einstein's idea. Time is a function of speed, which is a function of time......nice piece of work, eh?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 11:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b7dfef1b-2898-43b7-820c-a383bbbb65a7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #373702 |
On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 11:34:47 AM UTC-7, Henry Wilson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:58:49 +0100, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> Time is a function of speed, which is a function of time......nice piece
> of work, eh?
a = -GM/r^2
v = Int{a*dt} = -Int{GM/r^2}
r = Int{v*dt}
r is a function of velocity which is a function of r.
Nice piece of work, dingbat. Have you checked the functionality of
your brain recently?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Carmine Portacio <carpo@trilogybearing.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 21:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n717id$hsp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #373706 |
Gary Harnagel wrote:
> On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 11:34:47 AM UTC-7, Henry Wilson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:58:49 +0100, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>> Time is a function of speed, which is a function of time......nice
>> piece of work, eh?
>
> a = -GM/r^2 v = Int{a*dt} = -Int{GM/r^2} r = Int{v*dt}
> r is a function of velocity which is a function of r.
This is unbelievable unbelievable. The above functions are totally
different unrelated functions. The former is due to Relativity Effects,
the latter is pure Newtonian. Without tensors, you never will understand
Relativity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 09:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n72gb4$8sl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #373710 |
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 21:41:34 +0000, Carmine Portacio wrote:
> Gary Harnagel wrote:
>
>> On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 11:34:47 AM UTC-7, Henry Wilson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:58:49 +0100, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>>> Time is a function of speed, which is a function of time......nice
>>> piece of work, eh?
>>
>> a = -GM/r^2 v = Int{a*dt} = -Int{GM/r^2} r = Int{v*dt}
>> r is a function of velocity which is a function of r.
>
> This is unbelievable unbelievable. The above functions are totally
> different unrelated functions. The former is due to Relativity Effects,
> the latter is pure Newtonian. Without tensors, you never will understand
> Relativity.
Poor little gary.. One can only feel sorry for him...He is such an
embarrassment and a liability for his fellow Einsteinians.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 09:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n72ha7$bj7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #373706 |
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:17:14 -0800, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 11:34:47 AM UTC-7, Henry Wilson wrote:
> a = -GM/r^2 v = Int{a*dt} = -Int{GM/r^2}
> r = Int{v*dt}
That is an equation, not aan identity.
>
> r is a function of velocity which is a function of r.
r is not a variable. It has a particular value.
r=Int(dx/dt)dt is dimensionally correct...but that doesn't make r a
function of itself.
According to Einstein, Time varies as a function of itself.
> Nice piece of work, dingbat. Have you checked the functionality of your
> brain recently?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 05:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <39bb6e3e-7d22-4050-93d3-7b5dc0b39a39@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #373747 |
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 2:34:01 AM UTC-7, Henry Wilson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:17:14 -0800, Gary Harnagel wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 11:34:47 AM UTC-7, Henry Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > [An embarrassment that Wily "Wilson" prefers to forget about]
So I'll reinsert it here:
> > > Time is a function of speed, which is a function of time......
> > > nice piece of work, eh?
> >
> > a = -GM/r^2 v = Int{a*dt} = -Int{GM/r^2}
> > r = Int{v*dt}
>
> That is an equation, not aan identity.
Wow! Now Weirdo Wilson thinks that identities aren't equations. Which
one of his two brain cells created that little bubble of baloney?
http://www.mathwords.com/i/identity.htm
"Identity (Equation or Inequality)
"An equation which is true regardless of what values are substituted
for any variables"
So:
t' = (t - v*x/c^2)/sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2)
x' = (x - v*t))/sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2)
are not equations? Whacko Wilson has come up with his own math rules!
> > r is a function of velocity which is a function of r.
>
> r is not a variable. It has a particular value.
Hahahaha! What a moron Wacky Wilson is! What "particular value" is that?
It is CLEARLY a variable:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_(mathematics)
"a variable is an alphabetic character representing a number, called
the value of the variable, which is either arbitrary or not fully
specified or unknown."
So now Wool-brain Wilson has to be taught basic algebra. So sad.
> r=Int(dx/dt)dt is dimensionally correct...but that doesn't make r a
> function of itself.
>
> According to Einstein, Time varies as a function of itself.
Nope, Whacked-out Wilson has just shown above that he doesn't understand
math, so anything he says must be supported by conclusive evidence. He
has not done anything other than make baseless assertions.
> > Nice piece of work, dingbat. Have you checked the functionality of your
> > brain recently?
Apparently, he hasn't checked to see if he even has a brain.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 15:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n7316b$65r$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #373702 |
On 11.01.2016 19:34, Henry Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:58:49 +0100, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > >> On 11.01.2016 09:41, Henry Wilson wrote: >>> >>> T = fn(L/T), where T and L are nothing in particular. >> >> means: >> >>> Time is a function of itself. >> >> Well done, Henry! :-D > > No I cannot take the credit for that. It was Einstein's idea. > > Time is a function of speed, which is a function of time......nice piece > of work, eh? > So it has come this far. -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 09:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n737gv$1m7q$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #373754 |
On 1/12/2016 8:04 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > On 11.01.2016 19:34, Henry Wilson wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:58:49 +0100, Paul B. Andersen wrote: >> >>> On 11.01.2016 09:41, Henry Wilson wrote: >>>> >>>> T = fn(L/T), where T and L are nothing in particular. >>> >>> means: >>> >>>> Time is a function of itself. >>> >>> Well done, Henry! :-D >> >> No I cannot take the credit for that. It was Einstein's idea. >> >> Time is a function of speed, which is a function of time......nice piece >> of work, eh? >> > > So it has come this far. > Hardly worth responding to him. Bottom feeder these days. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 08:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <525fd7ba-eeab-4d23-91ac-06a1f2e3d8bd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #373760 |
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 8:53:07 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > On 1/12/2016 8:04 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > > > > On 11.01.2016 19:34, Henry Wilson wrote: > > > > > > Time is a function of speed, which is a function of time......nice piece > > > of work, eh? > > > > > > > So it has come this far. > > > > Hardly worth responding to him. Bottom feeder these days. > > -- > Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables Indeed. His previous asininities were of a higher caliber than his present ones. Gary
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 08:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ee83cee7-557a-4e25-9234-e3f4a6dbfeb3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #373765 |
Ralph is completely rudderless without Andro...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 11:06 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n73bq9$1u42$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #373771 |
On 1/12/2016 10:49 AM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > Ralph is completely rudderless without Andro... > This is because physics is not his interest. Banter of a particular style is his interest. Now he has lost his banter partner and others are not willing to engage in a similar way, so there's little left for him here. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 18:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n73ged$8gi$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #373773 |
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:06:18 -0600, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 1/12/2016 10:49 AM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: >> Ralph is completely rudderless without Andro... >> >> > This is because physics is not his interest. Banter of a particular > style is his interest. Now he has lost his banter partner and others are > not willing to engage in a similar way, so there's little left for him > here. Naturally I expected this kind of reaction from the ratpack. Any claim that TIME is somehow affected by velocity means that TIME is somehow affected by itself. How else could Einstein's silly claim be interpreted? What does it mean to say that "a moving clock runs slow"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 12:37 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n73h5t$9cg$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #373781 |
On 1/12/2016 12:25 PM, Henry Wilson wrote: > Naturally I expected this kind of reaction from the ratpack. Any claim > that TIME is somehow affected by velocity means that TIME is somehow > affected by itself. > > How else could Einstein's silly claim be interpreted? What does it mean > to say that "a moving clock runs slow"? Your search for causality in the order of written equations is as well-conceived as a hunt for diamonds the dumpster behind a Burger King. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 18:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n73hi4$ad1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #373783 |
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:37:50 -0600, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 1/12/2016 12:25 PM, Henry Wilson wrote: >> Naturally I expected this kind of reaction from the ratpack. Any claim >> that TIME is somehow affected by velocity means that TIME is somehow >> affected by itself. >> >> How else could Einstein's silly claim be interpreted? What does it mean >> to say that "a moving clock runs slow"? > > Your search for causality in the order of written equations is as > well-conceived as a hunt for diamonds the dumpster behind a Burger King. Please talk science please, rather than jewelry or cooking...alhough you no doubt know infinitely more about the latter than the former. x/0 = infinity
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 12:46 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <n73hl7$aaa$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #373785 |
On 1/12/2016 12:44 PM, Henry Wilson wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:37:50 -0600, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 1/12/2016 12:25 PM, Henry Wilson wrote: >>> Naturally I expected this kind of reaction from the ratpack. Any claim >>> that TIME is somehow affected by velocity means that TIME is somehow >>> affected by itself. >>> >>> How else could Einstein's silly claim be interpreted? What does it mean >>> to say that "a moving clock runs slow"? >> >> Your search for causality in the order of written equations is as >> well-conceived as a hunt for diamonds the dumpster behind a Burger King. > > Please talk science please, I will when you do. So far, you seem to be claiming some causality based on the order of terms in an equation. That ain't science. > rather than jewelry or cooking...alhough you > no doubt know infinitely more about the latter than the former. > x/0 = infinity > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 16:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <561ff09d-24d4-4373-9873-04907519ce54@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #373785 |
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 10:44:24 AM UTC-8, Henry Wilson (AKA Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge) wrote: > x/0 = infinity No, Ralph, it is not. Even a freshman physics student knows this... and you claim to be the only qualified physicist on this forum? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_by_zero "... division by zero is undefined" http://scienceblogs.com/goodmath/2008/10/13/infinity-is-not-a-number/ "1/0 is infinity because ...". Bzzt. No. 1/0 is not infinity. 1/0 is nothing. 1/0 isn't defined in our number systems: it's not a number. In fact, it's not just not a number, it's nothing. It's a meaningless expression. Asking what 1/0 is is like asking "What's the square root of a nice juicy plum?". https://www.quora.com/Is-1-0-infinity " It's not. In arithmetic, as it is normally practiced, you can't divide by zero. The reason you can't do this is that 1/a=b is the same as ab=1. For the case a=0, we would need 0b=1. No such b is possible." You REALLY needed Andro to stay afloat, and it shows...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 9 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web