Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #466586 > unrolled thread
| Started by | mitchrae3323@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-01 22:42 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-08-05 00:54 +0200 |
| Articles | 10 on this page of 30 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-01 22:42 -0700
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 13:03 -0700
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-02 13:09 -0700
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 22:23 -0700
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-08-03 00:04 -0700
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Ecký Zcitná <ifmv@bsimdo.ac> - 2018-08-02 22:55 +0000
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-08-02 21:35 -0700
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-04 15:00 +0200
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Ecký Zcitná <ifmv@bsimdo.ap> - 2018-08-04 13:13 +0000
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-04 15:31 +0200
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Ecký Zcitná <ifmv@bsimde.av> - 2018-08-04 13:41 +0000
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-04 16:39 +0200
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Ecký Zcitná <ifmv@bsimde.bs> - 2018-08-04 16:21 +0000
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-08-04 14:25 -0700
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Tson Ylor <uo@srsysts.ll> - 2018-08-04 21:32 +0000
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-08-04 14:51 -0700
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Tson Ylor <uo@srsysts.ll> - 2018-08-04 22:56 +0000
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-05 01:15 +0200
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Tson Ylor <uo@srsysts.sd> - 2018-08-05 11:58 +0000
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-05 15:06 +0200
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-08-05 17:19 +0000
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-08-05 14:22 -0700
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Owen Scharff <nehh@fenohw.ho> - 2018-08-05 21:30 +0000
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-08-05 19:21 -0700
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Owen Scharff <nehh@fenohw.ho> - 2018-08-06 11:37 +0000
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-08-04 19:43 -0400
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Tson Ylor <uo@srsysts.sd> - 2018-08-05 11:53 +0000
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-08-04 22:05 -0700
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Tson Ylor <uo@srsysts.ll> - 2018-08-05 11:34 +0000
Re: Neutron's Solid Surfaces; Neutron stars obey Pauli Exclusion Principle Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-08-05 00:54 +0200
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 17:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n6oj3f-2cn.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #466942 |
In sci.physics Tson Ylor <uo@srsysts.sd> wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > >>>> peoples "The word people means more than one person: >>> >>> No idiot, it means a group of persons, which is singular. We are >>> working >> ^^^^^ >>> in groups around here. Which would be plural. But a group is singular. >>> As you clearly can see. >> >> ROTFL. You just can’t make that stuff up. > > I read soemwhere, you pretending having a bachelor in computer science, > and not even knowing Logic operations on sets and groups?? > A _set of objects_ is SINGULAR, even in your fucking english, fool! > > This place is been hijacked by autistic imbeciles posing as wannabe > physicists. Sad, but true. I better leave. Yet another babbling kook for the kill file. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 14:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d99af16f-1b74-4ce6-bc5b-dc3c1bef6ab0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466942 |
On Sunday, August 5, 2018 at 4:58:13 AM UTC-7, the dimwit Tson Ylor wrote: > This place is been hijacked by autistic imbeciles posing as wannabe > physicists. Sad, but true. I better leave. ... says the autistic imbecile posing as a wannabe physicist. But it is true, however... you should leave... although we all know you will nymshift again and reappear sometime soon... BTW, in your first sentence, you have conjugated the linking verb "be" incorrectly, which is no surprise since your English skills are woefully inadequate. Virtually no one who actually knows English would *ever* say 'is been'...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Owen Scharff <nehh@fenohw.ho> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 21:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pk7qa4$c6r$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #466992 |
pnalsing wrote: > BTW, in your first sentence, you have conjugated the linking verb "be" > incorrectly, which is no surprise since your English skills are woefully > inadequate. Virtually no one who actually knows English would *ever* say > 'is been'... And you know it, "virtually". Unaware what the term is standing for. Let me guess, a polish guy talking grammar and phrase morphology, in a place aimed for science. Go away, troll. You are talking vocabulary.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 19:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <db5186c0-c402-4675-9b7d-1bfffb5b18b9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466993 |
On Sunday, August 5, 2018 at 2:30:50 PM UTC-7, Owen Scharff wrote: > pnalsing wrote: > > > BTW, in your first sentence, you have conjugated the linking verb "be" > > incorrectly, which is no surprise since your English skills are woefully > > inadequate. Virtually no one who actually knows English would *ever* say > > 'is been'... > > And you know it, "virtually". Unaware what the term is standing for. Let > me guess, a polish guy talking grammar and phrase morphology, in a place > aimed for science. Go away, troll. You are talking vocabulary. Ah, I see you are already back, pretending to be yet another ignorant troll! How many is that now, 15 or 20? 30? More than that?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Owen Scharff <nehh@fenohw.ho> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-06 11:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pk9btk$nu8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #467019 |
pnalsing wrote: > On Sunday, August 5, 2018 at 2:30:50 PM UTC-7, Owen Scharff wrote: >> pnalsing wrote: >> >> > BTW, in your first sentence, you have conjugated the linking verb >> > "be" incorrectly, which is no surprise since your English skills are >> > woefully inadequate. Virtually no one who actually knows English >> > would *ever* say 'is been'... >> >> And you know it, "virtually". Unaware what the term is standing for. >> Let me guess, a polish guy talking grammar and phrase morphology, in a >> place aimed for science. Go away, troll. You are talking vocabulary. > > Ah, I see you are already back, pretending to be yet another ignorant > troll! How many is that now, 15 or 20? 30? More than that? No, I am just pointing out your ignorance, in trying to play smart-ass, not even knowing what the term "virtually" stands for. Not to mention science and physics. Unbelievable how many morons this group is attracting here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@volney.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 19:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pk5dk7$hs9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #466899 |
On 8/4/2018 6:56 PM, the nymshifting troll trolled as Tson Ylor: > pnalsing wrote: > >>> Just think, this is a forum for thinking. How is your "people" >>> singular, >>> when you say si plural, then? Peoples would be plural, but you have no >>> plural. You are invalidated by your own lemma. >> >> Apparently, you can't read English either, and apparently do not really >> understand the language... >> >> https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-people-peoples-and- > peoples >> "The word people means more than one person: > > No idiot, it means a group of persons, which is singular. We are working > in groups around here. Which would be plural. But a group is singular. As > you clearly can see. The nymshifting troll just gets stupider and stupider every time it shifts nyms. It seems to think Serbian grammar rules apply to English or something.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tson Ylor <uo@srsysts.sd> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 11:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pk6ofm$e52$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #466903 |
the severe autistic fool Volney wrote: >>> Apparently, you can't read English either, and apparently do not >>> really understand the language... >>> "The word people means more than one person: >> >> No idiot, it means a group of persons, which is singular. We are >> working in groups around here. Which would be plural. But a group is >> singular. As you clearly can see. > > The nymshifting troll just gets stupider and stupider every time it > shifts nyms. It seems to think Serbian grammar rules apply to English or > something. This imbecile named "Volney", a homo name, is not knowing the basics and introductory, for instance in computing and mathematics a "set of objects" is SINGULAR. These autistic morons are not even knowing elementary Logic, as Boolean operations, rules, groups, sets etc, etc. How many autistic morons are there in here??
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 22:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <edbcf64f-9e5e-41d3-9a20-822460bdc3dd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #466899 |
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 3:57:00 PM UTC-7, the dimwit Tson Ylor wrote: > pnalsing wrote: > > >> Just think, this is a forum for thinking. How is your "people" > >> singular, > >> when you say si plural, then? Peoples would be plural, but you have no > >> plural. You are invalidated by your own lemma. > > > > Apparently, you can't read English either, and apparently do not really > > understand the language... > > > > https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-people-peoples-and- > peoples > > "The word people means more than one person: > > No idiot, it means a group of persons, which is singular. We are working > in groups around here. Which would be plural. But a group is singular. As > you clearly can see. You clearly don't have the brains of a lamp post. Keep up the good work, you are very entertaining and will always be good for a laugh.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tson Ylor <uo@srsysts.ll> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 11:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pk6nd3$e52$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #466923 |
the stupid uneducated troll pnalsing wrote: > Dr. Tson Ylor wrote: >> pnalsing wrote: >> >> Just think, this is a forum for thinking. How is your "people" >> >> singular, >> >> when you say si plural, then? Peoples would be plural, but you have >> >> no plural. You are invalidated by your own lemma. >> > >> > Apparently, you can't read English either, and apparently do not >> > really understand the language... >> > >> > https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-people-peoples- and- >> peoples >> > "The word people means more than one person: >> >> No idiot, it means a group of persons, which is singular. We are >> working in groups around here. Which would be plural. But a group is >> singular. As you clearly can see. > > You clearly don't have the brains of a lamp post. You keep making a fool of yourself. Buy a brain, fool. In mathematics for instance a _set of objects_ represents also "more than one". But is still singular, fool. ANd take a look at your fucking english, before anything else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-05 00:54 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <e58fef79-3e20-b444-0c0b-7d78c44a55a7@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #466890 |
The ’nym-shifting troll trolled as "Tson Ylor" <uo@srsysts.ll>:
^^^^^^^^^^
> pnalsing wrote:
>> On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 9:21:28 AM UTC-7, the dumbfuck Ecký
>> Zcitná wrote:
>>> This gnome of a pigEars can't even sense his english, that "all" is not
>>> plural, but singular alone. You just fell into the trap, pigEars. Just
>>> wonderful. It reveals how your brain is hard-wired.
>>
>> Your English is atrocious...
>> Correct: All of the people clapped their hands.
>> (All refers to people, which is plural.)
>
> Just think, this is a forum for thinking. How is your "people" singular,
> when you say si plural, then? Peoples would be plural, but you have no
> plural. You are invalidated by your own lemma.
LOL
--
PointedEars
Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web