Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #362030 > unrolled thread
| Started by | fuller.david@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-27 16:18 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-09-18 08:32 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 194 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-27 16:18 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-27 20:38 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-27 18:26 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:04 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-31 15:47 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-31 20:48 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-31 18:38 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-31 22:34 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-31 17:23 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-31 17:38 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-31 21:02 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-01 08:24 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-01 08:35 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-01 08:25 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 04:53 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-31 12:23 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 10:53 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-31 15:59 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 15:33 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-31 18:01 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 17:34 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-31 18:42 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 17:46 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-31 20:41 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 08:15 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 17:19 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:44 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 18:14 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 17:50 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 20:24 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 12:34 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 14:11 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 14:52 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 17:20 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-02 19:59 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 12:37 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 20:19 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 07:30 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 12:39 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 20:20 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 07:31 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 12:41 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 20:24 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 12:42 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 20:28 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 12:45 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 20:36 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 07:39 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 17:51 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 20:25 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 17:54 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 20:32 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 12:35 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 14:18 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 14:44 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 16:33 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:53 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 18:25 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 10:20 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 15:51 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:53 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 17:55 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 20:34 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 12:38 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 14:23 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 14:40 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 16:27 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:49 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 18:09 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 09:54 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 11:15 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 17:56 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 20:36 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 12:40 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 14:24 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 14:38 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 16:26 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:48 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 18:05 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-02 15:39 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 20:12 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-02 19:08 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 17:57 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 20:37 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-01 17:46 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 12:41 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 14:27 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 14:37 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 16:22 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:42 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 17:36 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 08:54 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-03 08:03 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 11:22 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-03 08:45 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 20:18 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-03 19:39 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 23:18 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-04 03:57 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-04 09:23 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-04 07:08 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-04 15:51 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-05 05:23 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-05 12:52 +0000
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-05 11:58 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-05 11:57 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-05 16:11 +0000
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-05 10:46 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-05 21:49 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-06 06:03 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-05 14:19 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-05 14:25 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-05 19:39 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-05 21:31 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-06 01:25 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 10:53 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-03 11:15 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 20:39 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-05 15:19 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-05 22:34 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-06 03:01 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-06 20:29 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-06 20:34 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-06 20:40 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-07 07:05 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-07 07:11 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-10 15:51 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 11:40 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy Reginald Ehrett <chasi@competence.org> - 2015-09-03 16:01 +0000
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 15:55 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-03 20:03 +0000
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-03 20:09 +0000
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-08-31 16:54 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-31 20:55 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 18:10 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-31 21:27 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 20:13 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 08:17 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-08-31 19:01 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-31 22:38 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-08-31 20:32 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 08:22 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 17:44 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:48 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 18:21 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 17:59 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 20:44 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 12:44 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 14:34 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 14:17 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 16:15 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:41 -0500
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-03 00:27 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 14:46 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-31 18:09 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-31 16:08 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 08:45 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-07 12:59 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-07 11:06 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-07 15:04 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-07 19:50 +0000
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-07 20:38 +0000
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-07 13:25 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-07 19:13 +0000
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-07 16:34 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-07 20:45 +0000
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-07 19:15 +0000
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-07 16:36 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 16:28 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-07 16:44 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-07 17:15 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 17:33 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-07 17:54 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 18:48 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-07 18:58 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-07 21:13 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-10 15:43 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-10 20:40 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-10 20:03 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-10 23:39 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-11 06:50 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-11 07:45 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-11 08:05 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-11 12:00 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-10-13 08:02 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-13 12:04 -0400
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-10-14 05:40 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-10-14 17:48 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-10-14 18:23 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-10-15 17:23 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-10-15 18:43 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-10-16 06:43 -0700
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance Euclid Baumann <eubaum@parallelnetwork.org> - 2015-10-16 13:55 +0000
Re: Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-09-18 08:32 -0700
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
| From | fuller.david@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 16:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance |
| Message-ID | <0179c76d-9a08-4911-b817-7a12192213e1@googlegroups.com> |
Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance c still = c
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 20:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <68bvtapgmitebs8gib744mcr5bk6d3070b@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #362030 |
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:18:24 -0700 (PDT), fuller.david@hotmail.com
wrote:
>Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance
>c still = c
Moron, the length of a second is always
the same ratio to the meter, so constants would
be constant even with the expanding matter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fuller.david@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-27 18:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <91f03106-a5aa-4916-8043-73924870b293@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #362035 |
No, impedance of the vacuum rules all the other constants
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 21:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ac1c208f-57bf-4cea-856a-130d4b32d6ac@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #362037 |
On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 9:26:27 PM UTC-4, fuller...@hotmail.com wrote:
> No, impedance of the vacuum rules all the other constants
Hi Fuller
I am getting the same answer using old school classical wave theory. Impedance changed but the speed of light remained constant for and expanding universe. We give vacuum too much respect. Its just another medium and should be treated as such.
Frequency in CPS = 47746482
Time in seconds = T 3.3e-6
Density in Henry = L 1.2e-6
Elasticity in Farads = C 8.8e-12
c in meters per second = R 300e+6
Impedance ohms per meter = Z 376
Time dilation = Z / 376 = gamma
Properties of a vacuum:
c = frequency 47.746482
R=300e6 c
Z=376 ohms
L 1.2 uH
C 8.8 pF
I will expand space. Density goes down and elasticity will go up as a consequence.
c = frequency 47.746482
R=300e6 c
Z=184.6 ohms
L .6 uH
C 17.6 pF
Calculation for this was:
IF T > 0 THEN R = 1 / T
IF R + C = 0 THEN R = Z / L: C = L / Z ^ 2
IF R + Z = 0 THEN R = 1 / SQR(L * C): Z = L / SQR(L * C)
IF C + L = 0 THEN C = 1 / (R * Z): L = Z / R
IF C + Z = 0 THEN Z = R * L: C = 1 / (R ^ 2 * L)
IF L + Z = 0 THEN L = 1 / (R ^ 2 * C): Z = 1 / (R * C)
IF L + R = 0 THEN R = 1 / (C * Z): L = C * Z ^ 2
T = 1 / R: F = R / W
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fuller.david@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 15:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b593f301-4164-4cdb-842f-e87cea058a8a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #362415 |
That's pretty nice. The rounding off ads to the clarity
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 20:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fct9uap7r6o31016qs5bme8k3v59bcv720@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #362544 |
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:47:50 -0700 (PDT), fuller.david@hotmail.com
wrote:
>That's pretty nice.
>The rounding off ads to the clarity
Did the message you are talking about vanish
from my server, or are you talking to somebody
on the phone?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fuller.david@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 18:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <17a51ff6-26fb-4070-b58f-ef814142ea9f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #362557 |
>That's pretty nice.
>The rounding off ads to the clarity
Did the message you are talking about vanish
from my server, or are you talking to somebody
on the phone?
You are a bad man
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 22:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <l93aua1707smuhvpj7slsfjn0mgevaea87@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #362570 |
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:38:48 -0700 (PDT), fuller.david@hotmail.com
wrote:
>
>>That's pretty nice.
>>The rounding off ads to the clarity
>
> Did the message you are talking about vanish
>from my server, or are you talking to somebody
>on the phone?
>
>
>You are a bad man
Why should readers have to check the
headers and follow the reference list to see
what you are responding to?
Heath was talking about the universe expanding,
not Divergent Matter, space does not expand in
the Divergent Matter model. and probably not
in this universe, the objects are moving in a
nothing vacuum.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fuller.david@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 17:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3e38a8a0-bda5-4630-906a-4cfea29fc024@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #362415 |
Frequency in CPS = 47746482
Time in seconds = T 3.3e-6
Density in Henry = L 1.2e-6
Elasticity in Farads = C 8.8e-12
c in meters per second = R 300e+6
Impedance ohms per meter = Z 376
Time dilation = Z / 376 = gamma
Properties of a vacuum:
c = frequency 47.746482
R=300e6 c
Z=376 ohms
L 1.2 uH
C 8.8 pF
I will expand space. Density goes down and elasticity will go up as a consequence.
c = frequency 47.746482
R=300e6 c
Z=184.6 ohms
L .6 uH
C 17.6 pF
Calculation for this was:
IF T > 0 THEN R = 1 / T
IF R + C = 0 THEN R = Z / L: C = L / Z ^ 2
IF R + Z = 0 THEN R = 1 / SQR(L * C): Z = L / SQR(L * C)
IF C + L = 0 THEN C = 1 / (R * Z): L = Z / R
IF C + Z = 0 THEN Z = R * L: C = 1 / (R ^ 2 * L)
IF L + Z = 0 THEN L = 1 / (R ^ 2 * C): Z = 1 / (R * C)
IF L + R = 0 THEN R = 1 / (C * Z): L = C * Z ^ 2
T = 1 / R: F = R / W
A change in the impedance of the vacuum could be seen as a blue or red shifting of the frequency of photons.
Just like gravitational red shifting or blue shifting of galaxies coming towards us.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fuller.david@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 17:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <934045ee-b0b8-40d6-a711-8b195baacde5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #362553 |
A change in the impedance of the vacuum could be seen as a blue or red shifting of the frequency of photons. Just like gravitational red shifting or blue shifting of galaxies coming towards us. If the universe is expanding as all mainstreamers say, then the blue shifting seen in the past is due to a different vacuum impedance. If the vacuum impedance is as invariant as many of you here say, then the blue shifted past is from the flow rate time being skewed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 21:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <58u9ua99pb515olqcul3aig981gh2786se@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #362553 |
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:23:56 -0700 (PDT), fuller.david@hotmail.com wrote: >Frequency in CPS = 47746482 >Time in seconds = T 3.3e-6 >Density in Henry = L 1.2e-6 >Elasticity in Farads = C 8.8e-12 >c in meters per second = R 300e+6 >Impedance ohms per meter = Z 376 >Time dilation = Z / 376 = gamma > >Properties of a vacuum: > >c = frequency 47.746482 >R=300e6 c >Z=376 ohms >L 1.2 uH >C 8.8 pF > >I will expand space. Density goes down and elasticity will go up as a consequence. > >c = frequency 47.746482 >R=300e6 c >Z=184.6 ohms >L .6 uH >C 17.6 pF > >Calculation for this was: > > IF T > 0 THEN R = 1 / T > IF R + C = 0 THEN R = Z / L: C = L / Z ^ 2 > IF R + Z = 0 THEN R = 1 / SQR(L * C): Z = L / SQR(L * C) > IF C + L = 0 THEN C = 1 / (R * Z): L = Z / R > IF C + Z = 0 THEN Z = R * L: C = 1 / (R ^ 2 * L) > IF L + Z = 0 THEN L = 1 / (R ^ 2 * C): Z = 1 / (R * C) > IF L + R = 0 THEN R = 1 / (C * Z): L = C * Z ^ 2 > T = 1 / R: F = R / W > >A change in the impedance of the vacuum could be seen as a blue or red shifting of the frequency of photons. >Just like gravitational red shifting or blue shifting of galaxies coming towards us. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwZuHJxXLs4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fuller.david@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 08:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <108a7328-02c4-4bbc-aa5a-d7ec41d86843@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #362415 |
On Sunday, August 30, 2015 at 11:05:00 PM UTC-5, John Heath wrote: > On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 9:26:27 PM UTC-4, fuller...@hotmail.com wrote: > > No, impedance of the vacuum rules all the other constants > > Hi Fuller > > I am getting the same answer using old school classical wave theory. Impedance changed but the speed of light remained constant for and expanding universe. We give vacuum too much respect. Its just another medium and should be treated as such. > > Frequency in CPS = 47746482 > Time in seconds = T 3.3e-6 > Density in Henry = L 1.2e-6 > Elasticity in Farads = C 8.8e-12 > c in meters per second = R 300e+6 > Impedance ohms per meter = Z 376 > Time dilation = Z / 376 = gamma > > Properties of a vacuum: > > c = frequency 47.746482 > R=300e6 c > Z=376 ohms > L 1.2 uH > C 8.8 pF > > I will expand space. Density goes down and elasticity will go up as a consequence. > > c = frequency 47.746482 > R=300e6 c > Z=184.6 ohms > L .6 uH > C 17.6 pF > > Calculation for this was: > > IF T > 0 THEN R = 1 / T > IF R + C = 0 THEN R = Z / L: C = L / Z ^ 2 > IF R + Z = 0 THEN R = 1 / SQR(L * C): Z = L / SQR(L * C) > IF C + L = 0 THEN C = 1 / (R * Z): L = Z / R > IF C + Z = 0 THEN Z = R * L: C = 1 / (R ^ 2 * L) > IF L + Z = 0 THEN L = 1 / (R ^ 2 * C): Z = 1 / (R * C) > IF L + R = 0 THEN R = 1 / (C * Z): L = C * Z ^ 2 > T = 1 / R: F = R / W ((1.2566370614359 uH) * 8.85418782 pF)^2 = 1.23799015 × 10^-34 s4 Planck's constant / (1.2379901 x (10^(-34))) = 5.35227993 m2 kg / s 1/( 8.85418782 pF / 1.2566370614359 uH) = 141925.729 300000000 - 141925.729 = 299858074.271 1 / ((8.85418782 pF) / (1.2566370614359 uH)) = 141 925.729 m4 kg2 s-6 A-4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fuller.david@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 08:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cd52e848-0a7a-48ea-8413-2108c647410b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #362657 |
On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 10:24:27 AM UTC-5, fuller...@hotmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, August 30, 2015 at 11:05:00 PM UTC-5, John Heath wrote: > > On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 9:26:27 PM UTC-4, fuller...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > No, impedance of the vacuum rules all the other constants > > > > Hi Fuller > > > > I am getting the same answer using old school classical wave theory. Impedance changed but the speed of light remained constant for and expanding universe. We give vacuum too much respect. Its just another medium and should be treated as such. > > > > Frequency in CPS = 47746482 > > Time in seconds = T 3.3e-6 > > Density in Henry = L 1.2e-6 > > Elasticity in Farads = C 8.8e-12 > > c in meters per second = R 300e+6 > > Impedance ohms per meter = Z 376 > > Time dilation = Z / 376 = gamma > > > > Properties of a vacuum: > > > > c = frequency 47.746482 > > R=300e6 c > > Z=376 ohms > > L 1.2 uH > > C 8.8 pF > > > > I will expand space. Density goes down and elasticity will go up as a consequence. > > > > c = frequency 47.746482 > > R=300e6 c > > Z=184.6 ohms > > L .6 uH > > C 17.6 pF > > > > Calculation for this was: > > > > IF T > 0 THEN R = 1 / T > > IF R + C = 0 THEN R = Z / L: C = L / Z ^ 2 > > IF R + Z = 0 THEN R = 1 / SQR(L * C): Z = L / SQR(L * C) > > IF C + L = 0 THEN C = 1 / (R * Z): L = Z / R > > IF C + Z = 0 THEN Z = R * L: C = 1 / (R ^ 2 * L) > > IF L + Z = 0 THEN L = 1 / (R ^ 2 * C): Z = 1 / (R * C) > > IF L + R = 0 THEN R = 1 / (C * Z): L = C * Z ^ 2 > > T = 1 / R: F = R / W > > ((1.2566370614359 uH) * 8.85418782 pF)^2 = 1.23799015 × 10^-34 s4 hbar = 1.05457173 × 10^-34 m2 kg / s (1.05457173 × 10^-34) / (1.23799015 × 10^-34 ) = 0.85184177757 > > Planck's constant / (1.2379901 x (10^(-34))) = 5.35227993 m2 kg / s > > > > 1/( 8.85418782 pF / 1.2566370614359 uH) = 141925.729 > > 300000000 - 141925.729 = 299858074.271 > > > 1 / ((8.85418782 pF) / (1.2566370614359 uH)) = 141 925.729 m4 kg2 s-6 A-4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | fuller.david@hotmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-01 08:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e7d1fee8-349a-41e3-a9fc-d974a51a02e7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #362415 |
On Sunday, August 30, 2015 at 11:05:00 PM UTC-5, John Heath wrote: > On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 9:26:27 PM UTC-4, fuller...@hotmail.com wrote: > > No, impedance of the vacuum rules all the other constants > > Hi Fuller > > I am getting the same answer using old school classical wave theory. Impedance changed but the speed of light remained constant for and expanding universe. We give vacuum too much respect. Its just another medium and should be treated as such. > > Frequency in CPS = 47746482 > Time in seconds = T 3.3e-6 > Density in Henry = L 1.2e-6 > Elasticity in Farads = C 8.8e-12 > c in meters per second = R 300e+6 > Impedance ohms per meter = Z 376 > Time dilation = Z / 376 = gamma > > Properties of a vacuum: > > c = frequency 47.746482 > R=300e6 c > Z=376 ohms > L 1.2 uH > C 8.8 pF > > I will expand space. Density goes down and elasticity will go up as a consequence. > > c = frequency 47.746482 > R=300e6 c > Z=184.6 ohms > L .6 uH > C 17.6 pF > > Calculation for this was: > > IF T > 0 THEN R = 1 / T > IF R + C = 0 THEN R = Z / L: C = L / Z ^ 2 > IF R + Z = 0 THEN R = 1 / SQR(L * C): Z = L / SQR(L * C) > IF C + L = 0 THEN C = 1 / (R * Z): L = Z / R > IF C + Z = 0 THEN Z = R * L: C = 1 / (R ^ 2 * L) > IF L + Z = 0 THEN L = 1 / (R ^ 2 * C): Z = 1 / (R * C) > IF L + R = 0 THEN R = 1 / (C * Z): L = C * Z ^ 2 > T = 1 / R: F = R / W Time dilation = Z / 376 = gamma Time dilation = Z / (4pi * 29.9792458) = gamma
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 04:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b1c687eb-c45d-491f-8a0f-2e7f044c8f4f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #362035 |
On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 6:39:22 PM UTC-6, kefischer wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:18:24 -0700 (PDT), fuller.david@hotmail.com > wrote: > > > Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance > > c still = c > > Moron, the length of a second is always > the same ratio to the meter, so constants would > be constant even with the expanding matter. Calling people names again, I see :-)) But you are devastatingly wrong again because some constants have units involving meters-squared per second. Take Planck's constant, which has the units of joule seconds, or kg*m^2*sec/sec^2, or kg*m^2/sec. So I guess you'll now have to claim that mass halves every ten minutes :-)) But pressure is Force/Area = kg*m/sec^2/m^2 = kg/(m*sec^2). Oops, since mass is decreasing while time and distance are increasing, we must be breathing vacuum now. And energy is kg*meters^2/sec^2, so energy is halving every ten minutes, and acceleration is meters/sec^2 so we must be in a zero-g environment by now, and the stupidity goes on and on and on. Apropos to John and fuller's observation, if epsilon0 and mu0 are changing such that their product is constant (i.e., so the speed of light is constant), then mu0/epsilon0 (i.e., the impedance of space) cannot be constant, but it obviously IS constant. This is what happens when an inadequate mind tries to force-fit its delusions onto reality. The square peg in the round hole comes to mind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 12:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <72v8uahiqgqb36uov5nm2de3ihd8gbc8m1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #362447 |
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:53:35 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel
<hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 6:39:22 PM UTC-6, kefischer wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:18:24 -0700 (PDT), fuller.david@hotmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Divergent matter = increase entropy = variation of vacuum impedance
>> > c still = c
>>
>> Moron, the length of a second is always
>> the same ratio to the meter, so constants would
>> be constant even with the expanding matter.
>
>Calling people names again, I see :-))
Remember the moral of the Foo bird story?
>But you are devastatingly wrong again because some constants have units
>involving meters-squared per second. Take Planck's constant, which has
>the units of joule seconds, or kg*m^2*sec/sec^2, or kg*m^2/sec. So I
>guess you'll now have to claim that mass halves every ten minutes :-))
I don't understand how you keep posting
such nonsensical objections, is it to help me,
or to get me to post more good physics? :-)
Do you remember how to measure the
quantity of mass? Accelerate the test specimen,
and calculate the mass from the distance and time
data.
If the distance and time interval both change
the same way, the result will be the same even
if the unit lengths change.
Mass per unit of volume may be a little
more difficult, and acceleration of the surface
as the unit lengths double, but those are
minor details.
>But pressure is Force/Area = kg*m/sec^2/m^2 = kg/(m*sec^2). Oops, since
>mass is decreasing while time and distance are increasing, we must be
>breathing vacuum now.
A kilogram is still a kilogram, a meter is
still a meter, and a second is still a second,
no matter how much matter expands and
time slows.
>And energy is kg*meters^2/sec^2, so energy is halving every ten minutes,
>and acceleration is meters/sec^2 so we must be in a zero-g environment
>by now, and the stupidity goes on and on and on.
Sorry to have to say the stupidity is yours.
>Apropos to John and fuller's observation, if epsilon0 and mu0 are changing
>such that their product is constant (i.e., so the speed of light is
>constant), then mu0/epsilon0 (i.e., the impedance of space) cannot be
>constant, but it obviously IS constant.
>
>This is what happens when an inadequate mind tries to force-fit its
>delusions onto reality. The square peg in the round hole comes to mind.
I just use a bigger hammer, the pegs
fit any hole.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 10:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1f1a4259-5465-4ad9-9128-bdb912d91faf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #362475 |
On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 10:23:26 AM UTC-6, kefischer wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:53:35 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel > <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 6:39:22 PM UTC-6, kefischer wrote: > > > > > > Moron, the length of a second is always > > > the same ratio to the meter, so constants would > > > be constant even with the expanding matter. > > > > Calling people names again, I see :-)) > > Remember the moral of the Foo bird story? Yes, you are covered with shit. > > But you are devastatingly wrong again because some constants have units > > involving meters-squared per second. Take Planck's constant, which has > > the units of joule seconds, or kg*m^2*sec/sec^2, or kg*m^2/sec. So I > > guess you'll now have to claim that mass halves every ten minutes :-)) > > I don't understand how you keep posting > such nonsensical objections, is it to help me, > or to get me to post more good physics? :-) It's to show others what an imbecile you are. Of course, you are clueless concerning your incompetence: "If you're incompetent, you can't know you're incompetent. [...] the skills you need to produce a right answer are exactly the skills you need to recognize what a right answer is." --David Dunning > Do you remember how to measure the > quantity of mass? Accelerate the test specimen, > and calculate the mass from the distance and time > data. You are stupidly wrong again. You need to measure the FORCE. > If the distance and time interval both change > the same way, the result will be the same even > if the unit lengths change. That's completely stupid. Acceleration is distance/seconds squared. So if time expands at the same rate distance does, acceleration must decrease. > Mass per unit of volume may be a little > more difficult, and acceleration of the surface > as the unit lengths double, but those are > minor details. You're yammering again. > > But pressure is Force/Area = kg*m/sec^2/m^2 = kg/(m*sec^2). Oops, since > > mass is decreasing while time and distance are increasing, we must be > > breathing vacuum now. > > A kilogram is still a kilogram, No, it's not. Planck's constant proves that it must diminish by half every ten minutes. > a meter is still a meter, and a second is still a second, no matter > how much matter expands and time slows. But one g is not one g. > > And energy is kg*meters^2/sec^2, so energy is halving every ten minutes, > > and acceleration is meters/sec^2 so we must be in a zero-g environment > > by now, and the stupidity goes on and on and on. > > Sorry to have to say the stupidity is yours. Saying stupid things like that makes you even stupider. > > Apropos to John and fuller's observation, if epsilon0 and mu0 are > > changing such that their product is constant (i.e., so the speed > > of light is constant), then mu0/epsilon0 (i.e., the impedance of > > space) cannot be constant, but it obviously IS constant. > > > > This is what happens when an inadequate mind tries to force-fit its > > delusions onto reality. The square peg in the round hole comes to mind. > > I just use a bigger hammer, the pegs fit any hole. Yeah, put a few in your head to fill up the vacuum. Hmmm, is the impedance of space increasing or decreasing? Is it easier to pound pegs in or harder?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 15:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <g8c9ua5rqe51ilka5o8q6los9nrk4ohlo1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #362483 |
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:53:17 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel
<hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 10:23:26 AM UTC-6, kefischer wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:53:35 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel
>> <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 6:39:22 PM UTC-6, kefischer wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Moron, the length of a second is always
>> > > the same ratio to the meter, so constants would
>> > > be constant even with the expanding matter.
>> >
>> > Calling people names again, I see :-))
>>
>> Remember the moral of the Foo bird story?
>
>Yes, you are covered with shit.
>
>> > But you are devastatingly wrong again because some constants have units
>> > involving meters-squared per second. Take Planck's constant, which has
>> > the units of joule seconds, or kg*m^2*sec/sec^2, or kg*m^2/sec. So I
>> > guess you'll now have to claim that mass halves every ten minutes :-))
>>
>> I don't understand how you keep posting
>> such nonsensical objections, is it to help me,
>> or to get me to post more good physics? :-)
>
>It's to show others what an imbecile you are. Of course, you are
>clueless concerning your incompetence:
>
>"If you're incompetent, you can't know you're incompetent. [...] the skills
>you need to produce a right answer are exactly the skills you need to
>recognize what a right answer is." --David Dunning
>
>> Do you remember how to measure the
>> quantity of mass? Accelerate the test specimen,
>> and calculate the mass from the distance and time
>> data.
>
>You are stupidly wrong again. You need to measure the FORCE.
>
>> If the distance and time interval both change
>> the same way, the result will be the same even
>> if the unit lengths change.
>
>That's completely stupid. Acceleration is distance/seconds squared.
>So if time expands at the same rate distance does, acceleration must
>decrease.
>
>> Mass per unit of volume may be a little
>> more difficult, and acceleration of the surface
>> as the unit lengths double, but those are
>> minor details.
>
>You're yammering again.
>
>> > But pressure is Force/Area = kg*m/sec^2/m^2 = kg/(m*sec^2). Oops, since
>> > mass is decreasing while time and distance are increasing, we must be
>> > breathing vacuum now.
>>
>> A kilogram is still a kilogram,
>
>No, it's not. Planck's constant proves that it must diminish by half
>every ten minutes.
>
>> a meter is still a meter, and a second is still a second, no matter
>> how much matter expands and time slows.
>
>But one g is not one g.
Can somebody please show Gary how
to do the simple math for matter expanding,
and how surface gravity on Earth is about
one g when the radius doubles and all
measurements double along with the unit
lengths.
>> > And energy is kg*meters^2/sec^2, so energy is halving every ten minutes,
>> > and acceleration is meters/sec^2 so we must be in a zero-g environment
>> > by now, and the stupidity goes on and on and on.
>>
>> Sorry to have to say the stupidity is yours.
>
>Saying stupid things like that makes you even stupider.
>
>> > Apropos to John and fuller's observation, if epsilon0 and mu0 are
>> > changing such that their product is constant (i.e., so the speed
>> > of light is constant), then mu0/epsilon0 (i.e., the impedance of
>> > space) cannot be constant, but it obviously IS constant.
>> >
>> > This is what happens when an inadequate mind tries to force-fit its
>> > delusions onto reality. The square peg in the round hole comes to mind.
>>
>> I just use a bigger hammer, the pegs fit any hole.
>
>Yeah, put a few in your head to fill up the vacuum. Hmmm, is the impedance
>of space increasing or decreasing? Is it easier to pound pegs in or harder?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 15:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ms2dnj$v7m$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #362507 |
On 8/31/2015 2:59 PM, kefischer wrote: > Can somebody please show Gary how > to do the simple math for matter expanding, > and how surface gravity on Earth is about > one g when the radius doubles and all > measurements double along with the unit > lengths. I take it this means you can't. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-31 18:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <oti9uahclnd7fpvov40jlkqv3j58mu9506@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #362511 |
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:33:57 -0500, Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On 8/31/2015 2:59 PM, kefischer wrote:
>> Can somebody please show Gary how
>> to do the simple math for matter expanding,
>> and how surface gravity on Earth is about
>> one g when the radius doubles and all
>> measurements double along with the unit
>> lengths.
>
>I take it this means you can't.
Help me! Help me!
Show me how you mess up the math.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web