Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #359958 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-08 06:55 +1000 |
| Last post | 2015-08-12 08:37 +1000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 146 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-08 06:55 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 16:40 -0500
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-08 08:27 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Ignorant Raving Crackpot <ignorantravingcrackpot@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 16:36 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-09 18:48 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:05 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-10 08:13 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-09 17:20 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-10 12:25 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 19:58 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-10 20:11 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-10 10:06 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-10 20:08 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-10 15:28 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-11 06:30 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-11 23:43 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-12 08:26 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-12 10:23 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-14 01:51 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-13 16:03 +0000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 11:39 -0500
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-14 19:24 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-14 14:52 +0000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 11:37 -0500
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-13 18:41 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-14 19:28 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-17 17:08 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-18 03:27 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-17 21:42 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-18 08:23 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-18 21:33 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-19 06:11 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Ignorant Raving Crackpot <ignorantravingcrackpot@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:20 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-20 05:53 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-19 14:09 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-20 19:14 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-20 03:42 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-20 12:33 +0000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-21 09:17 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-21 09:17 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-20 19:39 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-21 19:52 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-21 05:29 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-22 05:40 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-21 13:16 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-21 22:26 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-19 14:22 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-20 05:55 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-20 09:52 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-20 19:17 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-20 12:25 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 21:20 +0000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-18 08:22 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-18 03:15 +0000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-18 19:39 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-18 14:22 +0000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-18 21:38 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 09:27 -0500
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-11 06:22 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 18:52 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 15:34 -0500
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-08 03:01 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-08 19:35 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-08 15:45 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 07:46 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-09 08:57 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 07:44 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-08 20:00 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 14:00 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-08 23:36 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 15:18 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-09 07:09 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:19 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-09 18:31 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 09:40 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-09 21:30 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-09 13:05 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 18:16 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-10 07:50 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 16:37 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 16:39 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 16:43 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 08:05 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-11 08:59 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Felipe Delgado <fd@spreadspectrum.org> - 2015-08-11 16:27 +0000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-11 22:49 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-11 17:58 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-12 07:49 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-12 08:01 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-13 19:27 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-14 05:29 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Ignorant Raving Crackpot <ignorantravingcrackpot@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 03:32 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. underante <underante@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-12 07:50 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-12 22:53 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Ignorant Raving Crackpot <ignorantravingcrackpot@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:57 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-13 11:16 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Ignorant Raving Crackpot <ignorantravingcrackpot@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 06:05 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-13 21:21 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-18 06:22 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 07:06 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-18 19:55 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 16:25 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-21 06:09 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-09 12:18 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-09 12:22 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-09 18:23 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 07:59 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-10 08:15 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 18:55 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-09 22:10 -0500
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 20:27 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-10 20:15 +1000
Stephane Baune inserts foot in mouth. Deeper "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-08-13 12:38 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-07 19:19 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 19:25 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-08 13:02 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-09 18:37 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-09 14:32 +0200
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 07:33 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-09 18:10 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 07:56 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-10 20:19 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 06:39 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-11 06:35 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 16:28 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-12 08:30 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-12 08:07 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-13 07:25 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-12 17:14 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-14 02:01 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-13 11:57 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-14 19:36 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-14 06:08 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-15 06:00 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:04 -0500
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-15 06:43 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-14 15:07 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-09 11:23 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-10 08:25 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-10 14:37 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-11 08:24 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-12 11:14 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-13 07:29 +1000
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-13 13:07 -0700
Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Jon Price <jonelwoodprice@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 20:02 -0700
Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-12 08:37 +1000
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 19:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f12a5eaa-ce1e-484f-b801-0bcde5551df8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #361401 |
On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 5:17:55 PM UTC-6, HG Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 03:42:35 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > > "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a > > habit." -- Aristotle > > > > And so is stupidity. > > You should know. You were were born with it. I'm not the willfully-ignorant fool that can't explain why blue photons have more energy than red photons, but they both travel at the same speed. This little fact blows Ralphie-boy's sophist bullshit to smithereens, making himself the stupid one. Apparently Ralphie-boy is too stupid to understand that speed in our universe has a limit, and the blue photon/red photon phenomenon blows stupid little Ralphie-boy's specious BaTh bullshit right out of his sodden underpants.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 19:52 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <mksdtatobmeokav72dbkudq3fspq34fed7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361409 |
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 19:39:55 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 5:17:55 PM UTC-6, HG Wilson wrote: >> > >> > And so is stupidity. >> >> You should know. You were were born with it. > >I'm not the willfully-ignorant fool that can't explain why blue photons >have more energy than red photons, but they both travel at the same speed. >This little fact blows henrie-boy's sophist bullshit to smithereens, >making himself the stupid one. > >Apparently henrie-boy is too stupid to understand that speed in our >universe has a limit, and the blue photon/red photon phenomenon blows >stupid little henrie-boy's specious BaTh bullshit right out of his sodden >underpants. ARE YOU COMPLETELY DEVOID OF INTELLIGENCE? Did your parents have a Neanderthal apearance? I would have thought you might have picked up some scientific knowledge after all your years of posting crap here. Apparently not. You certainly have no idea of what BaTh is or even what Einstein's P2 implies. It is an insult to anyone's intelligence to even read your stupid messages. __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 05:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6af89d86-847d-454a-8e5b-d8adbdc3acba@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #361434 |
On Friday, August 21, 2015 at 3:52:15 AM UTC-6, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 19:39:55 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > > On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 5:17:55 PM UTC-6, HG Wilson wrote: > > > > > > You should know. You were were born with it. > > > > I'm not the willfully-ignorant fool that can't explain why blue photons > > have more energy than red photons, but they both travel at the same speed. > > This little fact blows henrie-boy's sophist bullshit to smithereens, > > making himself the stupid one. > > > > Apparently willfully-ignorant Ralphie-boy is too stupid to understand > > that speed in our universe has a limit, and the blue photon/red photon > > phenomenon blows stupid little willfully-ignorant Ralphie-boy's specious > > BaTh bullshit right out of his sodden underpants. > > ARE YOU COMPLETELY DEVOID OF INTELLIGENCE? Did your parents have a Neanderthal > apearance? I'm not the one raving like a psychotic fool :-))) > I would have thought you might have picked up some scientific knowledge > after all your years of posting crap here. Apparently not. Au contraire, cochon. I have learned a lot, but not by "posting." I learned by READING and contemplating and gaining understanding. "A wise person is full of questions. A dull person is full of answers." - Paulo Coelho "People with opinions just go around bothering each other." -- Buddha "Some people without brains do an awful lot of talking." -- L. Frank Baum All of YOUR years of posting have taught you NOTHING at all. It's time for you to get a little humility and learn something about the real world instead of trumpeting refuted ideas like BaThwater. > You certainly have no idea of what BaTh is You are devastatingly wrong, as you always seem to be, probably because of your vaunting arrogance. So what is willfully-ignorant Ralphie-boy's explanation for why blue photons don't travel faster than red photons? Inquiring minds want to have a good laugh at your expense. > or even what Einstein's P2 implies. Au contraire, willfully-ignorant pigheaded arrogant one. It implies the Lorentz transform, which predicts non-simultaneity. It also implies E = m*c^2. > It is an insult to anyone's intelligence to even read your stupid messages. > > Henry Wilson DSc. :-)))) Willfully-ignorant Ralphie-boy's psychological transference is quite droll. Gary
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-22 05:40 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <64vetalqqu17r4lccdgab4duqlr0l2b2a7@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361440 |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:29:04 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Friday, August 21, 2015 at 3:52:15 AM UTC-6, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: > >> You certainly have no idea of what BaTh is > >You are devastatingly wrong, as you always seem to be, probably because >of your vaunting arrogance. So what is willfully-ignorant henrie-boy's >explanation for why blue photons don't travel faster than red photons? >Inquiring minds want to have a good laugh at your expense. Idiot, I at least have a theory about that. You have nothing but Maxwell's 'aether' maths. Light of all wavelengths initially moves at c relative to its source because Maxwell's equations apply in the fields in which all photons originate. But photons don't remain independent for very long....they coalesce with others moving in the same direction. They also interfere with all other light, irrespewctive of direction. Have you ever heard of Huygen's principle, idiot? BaTh even explains what is behind that. >> or even what Einstein's P2 implies. > >Au contraire, willfully-ignorant pigheaded arrogant one. It implies the >Lorentz transform, which predicts non-simultaneity. It also implies >E = m*c^2. You have just proved your ignorance. Why do you bother to post at all? > >Gary __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 13:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <674d0d28-8a75-4974-8307-92575b1ab4b1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #361470 |
On Friday, August 21, 2015 at 1:40:54 PM UTC-6, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:29:04 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > > On Friday, August 21, 2015 at 3:52:15 AM UTC-6, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: > > > > > > You certainly have no idea of what BaTh is > > > > You are devastatingly wrong, as you always seem to be, probably because > > of your vaunting arrogance. So what is willfully-ignorant henrie-boy's > > explanation for why blue photons don't travel faster than red photons? > > Inquiring minds want to have a good laugh at your expense. > > Idiot, I at least have a theory about that. You have nothing but Maxwell's > 'aether' maths. Complete lying bullshit. No one needs an aether, stupid fool. > Light of all wavelengths initially moves at c relative to its source > because Maxwell's equations apply in the fields in which all photons > originate. But photons don't remain independent for very long....they > coalesce with others moving in the same direction. They also interfere > with all other light, irrespewctive of direction. Hahahaha! I was right, it's funny to see you drool nonsense. > Have you ever heard of Huygen's principle, idiot? > BaTh even explains what is behind that. No, it doesn't. You are a delusional fool. > > > or even what Einstein's P2 implies. > > > > Au contraire, willfully-ignorant pigheaded arrogant one. It implies the > > Lorentz transform, which predicts non-simultaneity. It also implies > > E = m*c^2. > > You have just proved your ignorance. Why do you bother to post at all? > > Henry Wilson DSc. Hahahaha! In your dreams, dishonest raving maniac. Gary
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-21 22:26 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mr81ij$qu5$1@node2.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #361473 |
Użytkownik "Gary Harnagel" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:674d0d28-8a75-4974-8307-92575b1ab4b1@googlegroups.com... |Complete lying bullshit. No one needs an aether, stupid fool. As a physicist and a complete moron, you know NOTHING about needs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 14:22 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mr1set$u84$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #361218 |
On 18.08.2015 22:11, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 21:33:44 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote: >> >> https://paulba.no/paper/index.html > > Hahahhhahha! The idiot laughs at what he doesn't understand. > I like the light clock one best. Which demonstrates that you, Ralph Malcom Rabbidge, have read none of the papers in that reference. Which will surprise no one. They contain math, and your mathematical illiteracy is well known. I note with interest that Ralph Malcom Rabbidge like a never performed experiment best. He intensely dislike all performed experiments because most of them falsify the ballistic theory and none of them falsify SR/GR. https://paulba.no/paper/index.html -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 05:55 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <mnn9tapulj2l0sfmnr7boskms5sg59bf7m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361283 |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:22:52 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: >On 18.08.2015 22:11, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 21:33:44 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote: >>> >>> https://paulba.no/paper/index.html >> >> Hahahhhahha! > >The idiot laughs at what he doesn't understand. > >> I like the light clock one best. > >Which demonstrates that you, Henry Wilson DSc., >have read none of the papers in that reference. >Which will surprise no one. >They contain math, and your mathematical illiteracy is well known. > >I note with interest that Henry Wilson DSc. >like a never performed experiment best. >He intensely dislike all performed experiments >because most of them falsify the ballistic theory >and none of them falsify SR/GR. No experiment has falsified BaTh. No experiment has supported SR. End of story.... >https://paulba.no/paper/index.html __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 09:52 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mr40vu$qm$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #361314 |
On 19.08.2015 21:55, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: > > No experiment has falsified BaTh. No experiment has supported SR. > End of story.... It has always puzzled me why anybody voluntarily will make a gigantic fool of himself by claiming something he must know is utter nonsense. :-D https://paulba.no/paper/index.html -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 19:17 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ck6btah069293bv88n3n3qreipr5tvqikq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361352 |
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:52:28 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: >On 19.08.2015 21:55, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: >> >> No experiment has falsified BaTh. No experiment has supported SR. >> End of story.... > >It has always puzzled me why anybody voluntarily will make >a gigantic fool of himself by claiming something he must know >is utter nonsense. :-D > >https://paulba.no/paper/index.html Sorry, i have read a lot of experiments that claim to support Einstein's silly P2 and not one of them would stand up in court of law. __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-20 12:25 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mr49v0$g60$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #361363 |
On 20.08.2015 11:17, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:52:28 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> > wrote: > >> On 19.08.2015 21:55, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: >>> >>> No experiment has falsified BaTh. No experiment has supported SR. >>> End of story.... >> >> It has always puzzled me why anybody voluntarily will make >> a gigantic fool of himself by claiming something he must know >> is utter nonsense. :-D >> >> https://paulba.no/paper/index.html > > Sorry, i have read a lot of experiments that claim to support Einstein's silly > P2 and not one of them would stand up in court of law. > As I said ... -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 21:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mqtj7l$f9t$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #361106 |
Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> writes: >On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:08:56 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> >wrote: >>Here is some of the vast amount of experimental >>evidence for the invariance of the speed of light: >> https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf >I just read the fourth of the above again and the only thng it proved to me >was that dingleberries were just as desperate then as they are now. >Surely, nobody in their right minds could take that paper seriously. >It contains at least 50 very dubious assumptions. Like what, Ralph?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HW@...(HG Wilson) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 08:22 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <7kn4talsbk67b3p0d903dq2r8pi0a38rqm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361130 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:20:53 +0000 (UTC), moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: >Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> writes: > >>On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:08:56 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> >>wrote: > >>>Here is some of the vast amount of experimental >>>evidence for the invariance of the speed of light: >>> https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf > >>I just read the fourth of the above again and the only thng it proved to me >>was that dingleberries were just as desperate then as they are now. >>Surely, nobody in their right minds could take that paper seriously. > >>It contains at least 50 very dubious assumptions. > >Like what, Henry? I'm not doing your homework for you Moron-y
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 03:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mqu80d$adn$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #361135 |
Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge writes: >On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:20:53 +0000 (UTC), moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com >(Michael Moroney) wrote: >>>It contains at least 50 very dubious assumptions. >>Like what, Henry? Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, you really are a slow learner, aren't you, Ralph. Mr. Rabbidge, I have told you repeatedly not to edit my quotes, Ralph. I have told you, Ralph, that doing so will only earn you, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, replies such as this one, Ralph, where I will use your real name, which is Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, a dozen or two times, Mr. Rabbidge. Ralph Malcolm, you do realize how easy cut-and-paste with a mouse makes inserting your name, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, into a post, over and over and over again, Ralph. Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, maybe I should get that mouse with a zillion buttons that Jeff Relf has, Ralph, so I can permanently assign one as "Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge", another as "Ralph Rabbidge" and a third as simply "Ralph", Ralph. Ralph Rabbidge, I bet you'd really love that, wouldn't you, Mr. Rabbidge. > I'm not doing your homework for you Moron-y Ralph Rabbidge, I cannot even find even one dubious assumption, Ralph, let alone 50, Ralph Malcolm. Mr. Rabbidge, please list just three "dubious assumptions", Ralph, and we can look into them in more detail, Ralph. Ralph, that's what a real DSc. would do, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 19:39 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <g1v5tahikc4nuem5q67h6g7l2d81of1rhd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #361151 |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 03:15:25 +0000 (UTC), moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > >> I'm not doing your homework for you Moron-y > >Henry Wilson, I cannot even find even one dubious assumption, Henry >let alone 50, Henry Wilson. You wont find a better Irish joke either, Moron-y, when you look in a mirror.. >Dr. Wilson, please list just three >"dubious assumptions", Henry look into them in more detail, >Henry. Henry, that's what a real DSc. would do, Henry George Wilson. __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 14:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mqvf2v$ql6$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #361179 |
Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge <hw@....> writes:
>On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 03:15:25 +0000 (UTC), moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com
>(Michael Moroney) wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not doing your homework for you Moron-y
>>
>>Henry Wilson, I cannot even find even one dubious assumption, Henry
>>let alone 50, Henry Wilson.
>You wont find a better Irish joke either, Moron-y, when you look in a mirror..
>>Dr. Wilson, please list just three
>>"dubious assumptions", Henry look into them in more detail,
>>Henry. Henry, that's what a real DSc. would do, Henry George Wilson.
Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, now I have my answer, Ralph. Mr. Rabbidge, you
really aren't simply stupid, you're actually insane by Mr. Einstein's
definition ("insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and
expecting different results"), Ralphy. Or you're just simply insane,
Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge. Ralphy Rabbidge, you do realize that every time
you do this, Ralph, you will be punished for it, Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge.
Ralphy, why do you have such a hangup over your name, which is Ralph
Malcolm Rabbidge, Ralph? Ralphy, is it because you don't want your
neighbors, who know your name is Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, to know what you
are doing online from your darkened house with the curtains drawn, that
you never leave, Ralph?
And Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge, why are you making fun of the Irish, Ralph?
You do realize that "Rabbidge" is a fine Irish name, don't you, Ralphy?
Are you racist, Ralph? Plus, Ralph, you come from a country where just
about all your ancestors were pickpockets, prostitutes and drunks, Ralph.
Admittedly, Ralph, the vast majority of Australians have done great things
for themselves, Ralphy, despite their questionable ancestry, Ralph. Ralph
Malcolm Rabbidge, it's too bad you couldn't do the same, Ralph.
-Mike (having fun taunting Ralph Malcolm Rabbidge)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 21:38 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mr01jl$gri$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #361179 |
On 18.08.2015 11:39, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 03:15:25 +0000 (UTC), moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com > (Michael Moroney) wrote: > >> >>> I'm not doing your homework for you Moron-y >> >> Ralph Malcom Rabbidge, I cannot even find even one dubious assumption, Ralph >> let alone 50, Ralph Malcom Rabbidge. > > You wont find a better Irish joke either, Moron-y, when you look in a mirror.. Is that the only dubious assumption you could find? :-D -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 09:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mqacce$2ta$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #360201 |
On 8/10/2015 5:08 AM, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: > Paul, your silly list does not answer the question. How does light in > Andromeda INSTANTLY know how to travel at the same speed as light here? > > I would say that requires communication faster than c, wouldn't you. No, it wouldn't. It would if you presumed that Andromeda had to ADJUST the speed from something else other than c relative to the earth to c relative to the earth. But such a presumption is ridiculous, doesn't happen, and isn't needed. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 06:22 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <rl1isadkump1jnshdnr5h7sp1eeuekq7nj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #360217 |
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:27:27 -0500, Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> wrote: >On 8/10/2015 5:08 AM, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote: >> Paul, your silly list does not answer the question. How does light in >> Andromeda INSTANTLY know how to travel at the same speed as light here? >> >> I would say that requires communication faster than c, wouldn't you. > >No, it wouldn't. > >It would if you presumed that Andromeda had to ADJUST the speed from >something else other than c relative to the earth to c relative to the >earth. But such a presumption is ridiculous, doesn't happen, and isn't >needed. Bodkin if you and PA were physicists rather than religious fanatics, you would understand that according to Einstein's second postulate, the distance between a photon emitted in Andromeda and one emitted here in the same direction would remain constant during their lifetimes. But since you are not physicists, you would not be able to comprehend what source independency implies. You need an above average IQ for that. Religious fanatics lie in the abnormally low bracket. __ Henry Wilson DSc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 18:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <efd74b81-795c-481b-a71a-e094e4636126@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #360154 |
On Sunday, August 9, 2015 at 6:13:33 PM UTC-4, HG Wilson wrote: > Wrong.... bullshit in fact. Read my explanation of the wave equation again. > This time think about what I said. I repeat: AoSin2pi(ft-x/L) simply says that the detector located at x which indicates time t will indicate an Amp of AoSin2pi(ft-x/L). > >There is no "there exists a wave". There is just the math and > >the values given by the detectors. No need of "exist". > > Gawd! You don't even know the basics. That is why *you* systematically failed the simple math riddles posed for fun in this NG... > No wonder you were so easily conned by Einsten. Never coned by E. In fact, when I was confronted with SR/E the first time, I said "bull". I then try to develop my own relativity theory. Lo and behold, got the same exact thing as he, independently. So, thats why I agree with SR: its mathematically consistent, no contradictions, and exp's support it well. > Einstein's theory requires a universal medium No, SR doesnt require it. There are "fluid dynamics" models that predict "c". But in SR, such "fluids" are not necesary and not even part of SR. Some models may use "fluids" and some may not. SR doenst. Live with that fact. > What model of SR accounts for its claim that light from differently moving > sources IMMEDIATELY reaches a common speed. The "axiom" of the postulate of the constancy of the speed of light. > More importantly, how can a photon in Andromeda know how to move at the same > speed as one on Earth? Irrelevant. We claim that such a photon has speed c. All exp's that we can perform supports this. Live with it!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web