Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #359958 > unrolled thread

Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed.

Started byHenry Wilson DSc. <hw@....>
First post2015-08-08 06:55 +1000
Last post2015-08-12 08:37 +1000
Articles 20 on this page of 141 — 19 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-08 06:55 +1000
    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 16:40 -0500
      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-08 08:27 +1000
        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Ignorant Raving Crackpot <ignorantravingcrackpot@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 16:36 -0700
          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-09 18:48 +1000
            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:05 -0700
              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-10 08:13 +1000
                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-09 17:20 -0700
                  Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-10 12:25 +1000
                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 19:58 -0700
                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-10 20:11 +1000
                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-10 10:06 +0200
                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-10 20:08 +1000
                        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-10 15:28 +0200
                          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-11 06:30 +1000
                            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-11 23:43 +0200
                              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-12 08:26 +1000
                                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-12 10:23 +0200
                                  Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-14 01:51 +1000
                                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-13 16:03 +0000
                                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 11:39 -0500
                                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-14 19:24 +1000
                                        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-14 14:52 +0000
                                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 11:37 -0500
                                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-13 18:41 +0200
                                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-14 19:28 +1000
                                        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-17 17:08 +0200
                                          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-18 03:27 +1000
                                            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-17 21:42 +0200
                                              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-18 08:23 +1000
                                                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-18 21:33 +0200
                                                  Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-19 06:11 +1000
                                                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Ignorant Raving Crackpot <ignorantravingcrackpot@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 13:20 -0700
                                                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-20 05:53 +1000
                                                        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-19 14:09 -0700
                                                          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-20 19:14 +1000
                                                            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-20 03:42 -0700
                                                              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-20 12:33 +0000
                                                                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-21 09:17 +1000
                                                              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-21 09:17 +1000
                                                                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-20 19:39 -0700
                                                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-19 14:22 +0200
                                                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-20 05:55 +1000
                                                        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-20 09:52 +0200
                                                          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-20 19:17 +1000
                                                            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-20 12:25 +0200
                                            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 21:20 +0000
                                              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-18 08:22 +1000
                                                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-18 03:15 +0000
                                                  Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-18 19:39 +1000
                                                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-18 14:22 +0000
                                                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-18 21:38 +0200
                        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 09:27 -0500
                          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-11 06:22 +1000
                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 18:52 -0700
        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 15:34 -0500
    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-08 03:01 +0200
      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-08 19:35 +1000
        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-08 15:45 +0200
          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 07:46 -0700
          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-08-09 08:57 -0700
      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 07:44 -0700
        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-08 20:00 +0200
          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 14:00 -0700
            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-08 23:36 +0200
              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 15:18 -0700
                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-09 07:09 +0200
                  Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:19 -0700
                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-09 18:31 +0200
                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 09:40 -0700
                        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-09 21:30 +0200
                          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-09 13:05 -0700
                          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 18:16 -0700
                            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-10 07:50 +0200
                              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 16:37 -0700
                              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 16:39 -0700
                              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 16:43 -0700
                              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 08:05 -0700
                                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-11 08:59 -0700
                                  Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Felipe Delgado <fd@spreadspectrum.org> - 2015-08-11 16:27 +0000
                                  Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-11 22:49 +0200
                                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-11 17:58 -0700
                                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-12 07:49 +0200
                                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-12 08:01 +0200
                                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-13 19:27 -0700
                                        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-14 05:29 +0200
                                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Ignorant Raving Crackpot <ignorantravingcrackpot@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 03:32 -0700
                                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. underante <underante@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-12 07:50 -0700
                                        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-12 22:53 +0200
                                          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Ignorant Raving Crackpot <ignorantravingcrackpot@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 15:57 -0700
                                            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-13 11:16 +0200
                                              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Ignorant Raving Crackpot <ignorantravingcrackpot@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 06:05 -0700
                                                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-13 21:21 +0200
                                                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-18 06:22 +0200
                                                  Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 07:06 -0700
                                                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-18 19:55 +0200
                                                  Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-18 16:25 -0700
                                                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-21 06:09 +0200
                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-09 12:18 -0700
                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-09 12:22 -0700
      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-09 18:23 +1000
        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 07:59 -0700
          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-10 08:15 +1000
            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 18:55 -0700
          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-09 22:10 -0500
            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 20:27 -0700
              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-10 20:15 +1000
              Stephane Baune inserts foot in mouth. Deeper "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-08-13 12:38 -0700
    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-07 19:19 -0700
    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 19:25 -0700
    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-08 13:02 +0200
      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-09 18:37 +1000
        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-09 14:32 +0200
    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 07:33 -0700
      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-09 18:10 +1000
        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 07:56 -0700
          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-10 20:19 +1000
            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 06:39 -0700
              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-11 06:35 +1000
                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-10 16:28 -0700
                  Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-12 08:30 +1000
                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-12 08:07 -0700
                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-13 07:25 +1000
                        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-12 17:14 -0700
                          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-14 02:01 +1000
                            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-13 11:57 -0700
                              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-14 19:36 +1000
                                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-14 06:08 -0700
                                  Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-15 06:00 +1000
                                    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:04 -0500
                                      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-15 06:43 +1000
                                        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-14 15:07 -0700
    Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-09 11:23 -0700
      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-10 08:25 +1000
        Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-10 14:37 -0700
          Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-11 08:24 +1000
            Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-12 11:14 -0700
              Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. HW@...(HG Wilson) - 2015-08-13 07:29 +1000
                Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-13 13:07 -0700
    Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Jon Price <jonelwoodprice@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 20:02 -0700
      Re: Interferometry Does Not Measure Light Speed. Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> - 2015-08-12 08:37 +1000

Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →

#360626

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-13 11:39 -0500
Message-ID<mqih7f$b89$2@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#360621
On 8/13/2015 11:03 AM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> writes:
>
>> pAUL,NOT INE OF YOUR SILLY LIST OF EXPERIMENTS MEASURES owls DIRECTLY,
>
> Ralph, you won't even read any of those experiments.  If you did, you'd
> see they all do.
>

Why would he read anything that he knows is wrong without reading it?
I mean, that's the beauty of Henry's philosophy.
1. Decide what the truth is.
2. Don't bother with anything that is in conflict with (1), as it's 
obviously wrong.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#360680

FromHenry Wilson DSc. <hw@....>
Date2015-08-14 19:24 +1000
Message-ID<mscrsa9tugdcqklq7t1p0l9nm5592n76b8@4ax.com>
In reply to#360621
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:03:53 +0000 (UTC), moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com
(Michael Moroney) wrote: "I am the funniest Irish joke of all!"

__

Henry Wilson DSc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#360719

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2015-08-14 14:52 +0000
Message-ID<mqkvc9$enc$3@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#360680
Henry Wilson DSc. <hw@....> writes:

>On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:03:53 +0000 (UTC), moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com
>(Michael Moroney) wrote: "I am the funniest Irish joke of all!"

Hey Ralphy-boy!  Why won't you just tell us how "Rabbidge" is a fine old
Irish name?  Ralphy, are you an even funnier Irish joke?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#360625

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-13 11:37 -0500
Message-ID<mqih41$b89$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#360617
On 8/13/2015 10:51 AM, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
> pAUL,NOT INE OF YOUR SILLY LIST OF EXPERIMENTS MEASURES owls DIRECTLY,
>
> __
>
> Henry Wilson DSc.

Do not drink and capslock, kiddies.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#360627

From"Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Date2015-08-13 18:41 +0200
Message-ID<mqihbf$ri2$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#360617
On 13.08.2015 17:51, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:23:06 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
>
>> On 12.08.2015 00:26, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 23:43:54 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You are kicking and screaming and calling the experimental evidence
>>>> silly, bogus, incredible, crap and nauseating.
>>>>
>>>> Have you then beaten me into a corner?
>>>
>>> Paul, you made your own corner to collapse into when you made your hilarious
>>> animation of a light clock.
>>
>> Does that mean that you didn't think that you beat me into
>> a corner by calling the following experimental evidence
>> silly, bogus, crap and nauseating?
>>
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>>
>> Does that mean that you have realized that you can't make
>> the experimental evidence go away by kicking and screaming?
>>
>
> pAUL,NOT INE OF YOUR SILLY LIST OF EXPERIMENTS MEASURES owls DIRECTLY,

You can't make the experimental evidence go away
by calling it silly, remember?

It's still here:
https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf

BTW:
https://paulba.no/LightClock.html
Does this animation frustrate you because it shows that
the emission theory predicts that the speed of light is
frame dependent and thus is falsified by a lot of
experimental evidence?


-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#360681

FromHenry Wilson DSc. <hw@....>
Date2015-08-14 19:28 +1000
Message-ID<uvcrsalrv0c7lgijho2iror4bvqlj32c6o@4ax.com>
In reply to#360627
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:41:12 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
wrote:

>On 13.08.2015 17:51, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:

>> pAUL,NOT INE OF YOUR SILLY LIST OF EXPERIMENTS MEASURES owls DIRECTLY,
>
>You can't make the experimental evidence go away
>by calling it silly, remember?
>
>It's still here:
>https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
>https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
>https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>
>BTW:
>https://paulba.no/LightClock.html
>Does this animation frustrate you because it shows that
>the emission theory predicts that the speed of light is
>frame dependent and thus is falsified by a lot of
>experimental evidence?

Not one of your experiments directly measures OWLS with two synched clocks.
Not one COMPARES OWLS from differently moving sources. All of ylour
experiments is littered with assumptions and vagueries that make
interpretation purely arbitrary. 

__

Henry Wilson DSc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361092

From"Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Date2015-08-17 17:08 +0200
Message-ID<mqsteh$lt6$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#360681
On 14.08.2015 11:28, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:41:12 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
> wrote:
>
>> On 13.08.2015 17:51, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
>
>>> pAUL,NOT INE OF YOUR SILLY LIST OF EXPERIMENTS MEASURES owls DIRECTLY,
>>
>> You can't make the experimental evidence go away
>> by calling it silly, remember?
>>
>> It's still here:
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>>
>> BTW:
>> https://paulba.no/LightClock.html
>> Does this animation frustrate you because it shows that
>> the emission theory predicts that the speed of light is
>> frame dependent and thus is falsified by a lot of
>> experimental evidence?
>
> Not one of your experiments directly measures OWLS with two synched clocks.
> Not one COMPARES OWLS from differently moving sources. All of ylour
> experiments is littered with assumptions and vagueries that make
> interpretation purely arbitrary.

So there!!!! :-D

Here is some of the vast amount of experimental
evidence for the invariance of the speed of light:
  https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
  https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
  https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
  https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
  https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf

You can kick and scream, but you can't make
the evidence go away, remember?

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361106

FromHenry Wilson DSc. <hw@....>
Date2015-08-18 03:27 +1000
Message-ID<h064tahtgcpstmg9iuboqjf184v3p8o0tn@4ax.com>
In reply to#361092
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:08:56 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
wrote:

>>
>> Not one of your experiments directly measures OWLS with two synched clocks.
>> Not one COMPARES OWLS from differently moving sources. All of ylour
>> experiments is littered with assumptions and vagueries that make
>> interpretation purely arbitrary.
>
>So there!!!! :-D
>
>Here is some of the vast amount of experimental
>evidence for the invariance of the speed of light:
>  https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>  https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>  https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
>  https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
>  https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>
>You can kick and scream, but you can't make
>the evidence go away, remember?

Paul, I'm don't have time to kick and scream. I am too busy laughing.

I just read the fourth of the above again and the only thng it proved to me
was that dingleberries were just as desperate then as they are now.
Surely, nobody in their right minds could take that paper seriously.

It contains at least 50 very dubious assumptions. I'm sure it could have
produced any answer they wanted. Why don't you read it with an open mind
instead of one that has been totally indoctrinated by the Einsteinian church.

__

Henry Wilson DSc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361123

From"Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Date2015-08-17 21:42 +0200
Message-ID<mqtdft$mmf$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#361106
On 17.08.2015 19:27, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:08:56 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
>>
>> Here is some of the vast amount of experimental
>> evidence for the invariance of the speed of light:
>>   https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>>   https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>>   https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
>>   https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
>>   https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>>
>> You can kick and scream, but you can't make
>> the evidence go away, remember?
>
> Paul, I'm don't have time to kick and scream. I am too busy laughing.

Quite.
You can laugh at the experimental evidence because
you don't understand it, but you can't make it go away.

> I just read the fourth of the above again and the only thng it proved to me
> was that dingleberries were just as desperate then as they are now.
> Surely, nobody in their right minds could take that paper seriously.
>
> It contains at least 50 very dubious assumptions. I'm sure it could have
> produced any answer they wanted. Why don't you read it with an open mind
> instead of one that has been totally indoctrinated by the Einsteinian church.
>
> __
>
> Henry Wilson DSc.

No DSc will ignore experimental evidence like this.
But you do.
What does that make you?

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361136

FromHW@...(HG Wilson)
Date2015-08-18 08:23 +1000
Message-ID<iln4talv4ucrkbifgqhc344r89oti1i7m8@4ax.com>
In reply to#361123
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:42:52 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
wrote:

>On 17.08.2015 19:27, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:08:56 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is some of the vast amount of experimental
>>> evidence for the invariance of the speed of light:
>>>   https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>>>   https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>>>   https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
>>>   https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
>>>   https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>>>
>>> You can kick and scream, but you can't make
>>> the evidence go away, remember?
>>
>> Paul, I'm don't have time to kick and scream. I am too busy laughing.
>
>Quite.
>You can laugh at the experimental evidence because
>you don't understand it, but you can't make it go away.

I don't want your silly list to go away. It is excellent proof of the
conspiracy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361215

From"Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Date2015-08-18 21:33 +0200
Message-ID<mr01ao$g81$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#361136
On 18.08.2015 00:23, HG Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:42:52 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
>>
>> You can laugh at the experimental evidence because
>> you don't understand it, but you can't make it go away.
>
> I don't want your silly list to go away. It is excellent proof of the
> conspiracy.

Quite.
This silly list will obviously convince the whole world
that the invariance of the speed of light only is
a product of "The Great Conspiracy":

  https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
  https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
  https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
  https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
  https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf

Struggling with your credibility, Ralph? :-D

More experimental evidence which is part of "The Great Conspiracy":
https://paulba.no/paper/index.html

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361218

FromHenry Wilson DSc. <hw@....>
Date2015-08-19 06:11 +1000
Message-ID<u247ta1ns7gq52tu8p1o85tub8roemcqch@4ax.com>
In reply to#361215
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 21:33:44 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
wrote:

>On 18.08.2015 00:23, HG Wilson wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:42:52 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
>>>
>>> You can laugh at the experimental evidence because
>>> you don't understand it, but you can't make it go away.
>>
>> I don't want your silly list to go away. It is excellent proof of the
>> conspiracy.
>
>Quite.
>This silly list will obviously convince the whole world
>that the invariance of the speed of light only is
>a product of "The Great Conspiracy":
>
>  https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>  https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>  https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
>  https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
>  https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>
>Struggling with your credibility, Henry? :-D

Not at all Paul. The only worthwhile experiments that test Einstein's P2 use
variable stars as moving light sources....and guess what?

>More experimental evidence which is part of "The Great Conspiracy":
>https://paulba.no/paper/index.html

Hahahhhahha! I like the light clock one best. I really epitomizes Dingleberry
desperation.

__

Henry Wilson DSc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361221

FromIgnorant Raving Crackpot <ignorantravingcrackpot@gmail.com>
Date2015-08-18 13:20 -0700
Message-ID<3862624e-6628-48b6-992c-aa8a78bba760@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#361218
On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 3:11:50 PM UTC-5, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 21:33:44 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
> wrote:
> 
> >On 18.08.2015 00:23, HG Wilson wrote:
> >> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:42:52 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
> >>>
> >>> You can laugh at the experimental evidence because
> >>> you don't understand it, but you can't make it go away.
> >>
> >> I don't want your silly list to go away. It is excellent proof of the
> >> conspiracy.
> >
> >Quite.
> >This silly list will obviously convince the whole world
> >that the invariance of the speed of light only is
> >a product of "The Great Conspiracy":
> >
> >  https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
> >  https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
> >  https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
> >  https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
> >  https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
> >
> >Struggling with your credibility, Henry? :-D
> 
> Not at all Paul. The only worthwhile experiments that test Einstein's P2 use
> variable stars as moving light sources....and guess what?

BaTh proves itself to be an utter failure at explaining variable star
light curves concurrently with observed color/temperature changes,
Doppler effects, and interferometric studies proving diameter changes
in pulsators and resolving the individual components of various 
eclipsing binaries?

> >More experimental evidence which is part of "The Great Conspiracy":
> >https://paulba.no/paper/index.html
> 
> Hahahhhahha! I like the light clock one best. I really epitomizes Dingleberry
> desperation.
> 
> __
> 
> Henry Wilson DSc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361313

FromHenry Wilson DSc. <hw@....>
Date2015-08-20 05:53 +1000
Message-ID<ujn9ta1aooebeie8u600ktbvlr32s22o6f@4ax.com>
In reply to#361221
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:20:45 -0700 (PDT), Ignorant Raving Crackpot
<ignorantravingcrackpot@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 3:11:50 PM UTC-5, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:

>> >Quite.
>> >This silly list will obviously convince the whole world
>> >that the invariance of the speed of light only is
>> >a product of "The Great Conspiracy":
>> >
>> >  https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>> >  https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>> >  https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
>> >  https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
>> >  https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>> >
>> >Struggling with your credibility, Henry? :-D
>> 
>> Not at all Paul. The only worthwhile experiments that test Einstein's P2 use
>> variable stars as moving light sources....and guess what?
>
>BaTh proves itself to be an utter failure at explaining variable star
>light curves concurrently with observed color/temperature changes,
>Doppler effects, and interferometric studies proving diameter changes
>in pulsators and resolving the individual components of various 
>eclipsing binaries?

How would YOU know? Your mind is made up before you even try to learn the
facts.....sure signs of brainwashing..

>> >More experimental evidence which is part of "The Great Conspiracy":
>> >https://paulba.no/paper/index.html
>> 
>> Hahahhhahha! I like the light clock one best. I really epitomizes Dingleberry
>> desperation.
>> 
>> __
>> 
>> Henry Wilson DSc.

__

Henry Wilson DSc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361326

FromGary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com>
Date2015-08-19 14:09 -0700
Message-ID<9a34ee68-0785-454b-bc6d-85b8025ddb3c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#361313
On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 1:53:56 PM UTC-6, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:20:45 -0700 (PDT), Ignorant Raving Crackpot
> <ignorantravingcrackpot@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > BaTh proves itself to be an utter failure at explaining variable star
> > light curves concurrently with observed color/temperature changes,
> > Doppler effects, and interferometric studies proving diameter changes
> > in pulsators and resolving the individual components of various 
> > eclipsing binaries?
> 
> How would YOU know? Your mind is made up before you even try to learn the
> facts.....sure signs of brainwashing..

Ralphie-boy's brain is the one being washed ... and in dirty water, too.

> No experiment has falsified BaTh. No experiment has supported SR.

Apparently, Ralphie-boy's brain needs to be washed in HONEST water since
he is still lying his fool head off.  Maybe the problem is that he has
NO brain to wash.

Gary

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361362

FromHenry Wilson DSc. <hw@....>
Date2015-08-20 19:14 +1000
Message-ID<3i6btatou6idd2o7rd1qtuhhl4hj5f3m31@4ax.com>
In reply to#361326
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:09:16 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com>
wrote:  "Ï am hereby confess to being a compete idiot".


__

Henry Wilson DSc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361366

FromGary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com>
Date2015-08-20 03:42 -0700
Message-ID<f500713a-9594-4a59-ba67-0ceda5a3ea62@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#361362
On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 3:14:32 AM UTC-6, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:09:16 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com>
> wrote:  "Ď am hereby confess to being a compete idiot".
> 
> Henry Wilson DSc.

We agree!  There is no way I can compete with your idiocy :-)))

What kind of idiot would claim BaTh is correct when it predicts the moon
travels in a wavy orbit that varies with the earth's rotation?  What kind
of idiot would deny time dilation when copious experimental evidence
overwhelmingly supports it?  What kind of idiot would regurgitate this
nonsense over and over and over again believing his fatuous claims would
have any effect on the real world?

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different
results." -- Albert Einstein

“A wise person is full of questions.  A dull person is full of answers.”
– Paulo Coelho

"He is not only dull himself; he is the cause of dullness in others."
 --Samuel Johnson

"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a
habit."  -- Aristotle

And so is stupidity.

Gary

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361368

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2015-08-20 12:33 +0000
Message-ID<mr4hes$sq3$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#361366
Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> writes:

>What kind of idiot would claim BaTh is correct when it predicts the moon
>travels in a wavy orbit that varies with the earth's rotation?  What kind
>of idiot would deny time dilation when copious experimental evidence
>overwhelmingly supports it?  What kind of idiot would regurgitate this
>nonsense over and over and over again believing his fatuous claims would
>have any effect on the real world?

>"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different
>results." -- Albert Einstein

There you have it, Ralph.  Two different people tell you you fit 
Einstein's definition of insanity for two different reasons.  What does
that tell you, Ralph?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361400

FromHW@...(HG Wilson)
Date2015-08-21 09:17 +1000
Message-ID<hunctadi71art4ipmc5gp9jdf2s8lbvh68@4ax.com>
In reply to#361368
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:33:32 +0000 (UTC), moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com
(Michael Moroney) wrote: "I m the funniest Irish joke of all time".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361401

FromHW@...(HG Wilson)
Date2015-08-21 09:17 +1000
Message-ID<00octapj2n0kh769tkbc4c2s47hu08ovlr@4ax.com>
In reply to#361366
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 03:42:35 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 3:14:32 AM UTC-6, Henry Wilson DSc. wrote:

>"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different
>results." -- Albert Einstein
>
>“A wise person is full of questions.  A dull person is full of answers.”
>– Paulo Coelho
>
>"He is not only dull himself; he is the cause of dullness in others."
> --Samuel Johnson
>
>"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a
>habit."  -- Aristotle
>
>And so is stupidity.

You should know. You were were born with it.

>Gary

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web