Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #358961 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-28 20:16 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-07-29 20:16 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 205 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-07-28 20:16 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2015-07-28 19:16 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-28 19:20 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2015-07-28 19:23 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-28 20:44 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 13:59 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 14:20 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 00:53 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 09:28 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 01:03 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2015-07-30 08:19 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-28 19:46 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-29 23:20 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 01:07 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 09:30 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-30 16:28 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-07-31 19:46 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-07-31 19:52 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 18:02 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-02 10:01 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 12:03 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-03 23:36 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 15:35 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-04 16:38 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 11:53 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-04 21:54 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-04 14:53 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-05 16:28 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 07:33 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-05 17:10 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-05 15:51 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 09:01 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-05 18:16 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-05 16:22 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 09:47 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-05 19:13 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 10:18 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-05 19:29 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 10:45 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-05 19:51 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 10:59 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-05 20:07 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:28 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-05 23:22 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 14:45 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-06 16:41 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:11 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-06 20:25 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:56 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-06 21:06 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:15 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-06 21:26 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:34 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-06 21:47 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 15:27 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 13:36 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-06 23:05 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 14:53 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 17:59 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-06 18:21 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-08-06 18:34 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 00:17 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-07 16:32 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 11:36 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-07 21:49 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 16:05 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-08 19:31 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-08 19:52 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:40 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-08 22:05 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Emmerich Schultheiß <emme@noemail.thx> - 2015-08-08 18:04 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-08 06:09 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-06 12:20 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-06 21:35 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:43 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-06 21:48 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 12:59 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-05 20:12 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-05 08:44 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 15:10 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-05 16:31 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 09:00 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-05 18:14 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-03 09:21 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-03 17:19 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-03 15:22 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 10:28 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-03 18:23 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 18:40 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 18:44 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 19:03 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 19:30 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 19:42 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 19:45 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 19:54 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 19:48 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 19:57 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 19:58 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 20:03 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 20:16 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 19:45 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 20:30 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 20:34 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 20:39 -0700
Fresh from getting his ass kicked in a humiliation, Stephane Baune pretends to "teach" "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-07-31 19:55 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-07-31 20:48 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-31 18:53 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 21:15 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 03:49 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 09:00 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 10:48 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 14:23 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:10 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:30 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 15:54 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-03 18:36 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 22:54 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 16:10 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 19:51 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-02 10:14 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 17:56 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-04 12:41 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 15:39 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-04 17:06 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 18:29 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-04 19:09 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 20:56 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-04 19:52 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 20:48 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-08 11:37 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:45 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-08 13:28 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 14:10 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-08 23:14 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 15:20 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-09 08:58 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 17:55 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-10 12:26 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 14:31 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-10 15:00 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 15:33 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-12 11:53 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 13:10 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-14 10:29 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:50 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-14 12:50 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 12:59 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-15 16:02 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 14:07 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-08 23:13 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox alsor@interia.pl - 2015-08-09 09:32 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-02 18:47 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-03 09:08 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-03 15:28 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-03 10:56 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:55 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-03 20:26 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 00:38 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-04 05:07 -0400
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 06:31 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-04 06:19 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 06:50 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 09:09 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-04 07:17 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 07:25 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 09:48 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 09:57 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-05 06:07 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 06:30 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-05 08:49 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 10:59 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-05 12:19 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 14:24 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-05 17:59 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 20:17 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 18:54 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-08-05 19:45 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-05 21:14 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 12:25 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-05 21:52 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 20:11 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-05 17:49 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-06 12:14 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-06 14:18 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-07 12:20 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-08 06:52 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-09 09:46 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-09 07:27 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-09 21:07 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 09:20 -0500
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:37 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-11 13:15 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-11 06:06 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 07:46 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-08-11 22:36 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-12 07:17 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 09:29 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-12 18:42 +0200
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-12 14:55 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 19:25 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-04 15:56 +0000
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 09:06 -0700
Stephane baune continues to puff himself "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-08-04 11:04 -0700
Re: Inescapable (symmetric) twins paradox John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-29 20:16 -0700
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 18:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b20bbb0b-5ef8-42a0-888a-52337127725a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #359866 |
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 5:59:37 PM UTC-7, Koobee Wublee wrote: > On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 2:53:12 PM UTC-7, JanPB wrote: > > > Sorry, the ball is in your court. > > Fine. Here you go. <shrug> > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics.relativity/9WNEIriVp5M/OhGBkODrYaoJ That link, of course, is total bullshit, only KW is too stupid to realize it. Get a freakin' life, you are a complete failure at physics...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 00:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <06eeda11-822a-4d67-bdda-9ab37f26174a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #359868 |
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 6:34:39 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 5:59:37 PM UTC-7, Koobee Wublee wrote: > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics.relativity/9WNEIriVp5M/OhGBkODrYaoJ > > That link, of course, is total bullshit, only KW is too stupid to > realize it. What is the reason? Yeah, Paul has no fvcking balls to object its opinion since the buffoon is scared shitless that Koobee Wublee will rip its fvcking reasoning apart. <shrug> Get a freakin' life, you are a complete failure at physics... <shrug>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 16:32 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mq2fho$lvp$1@node1.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #359861 |
Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:3f3c470a-0b31-4eb1-a4c5-8c19476b6d7b@googlegroups.com... > Dear Jan. > And you didn't. > Of course. |Sorry, the ball is in your court. You cannot just show up and declare |a huge body of knowledge "stupid" and be treated seriously. You said |physics did not follow common sense, you back it up. Do you really think I have a problem? Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): Best definition of "common sense": “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” -- Albert Einstein end of quote. Enough?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 11:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a4be6916-cb88-45c7-aa3f-34e2edb6ae4b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #359922 |
On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 7:32:26 AM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:3f3c470a-0b31-4eb1-a4c5-8c19476b6d7b@googlegroups.com... > > > Dear Jan. > > And you didn't. > > Of course. > > |Sorry, the ball is in your court. You cannot just show up and declare > |a huge body of knowledge "stupid" and be treated seriously. You said > |physics did not follow common sense, you back it up. > > Do you really think I have a problem? > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > Best definition of "common sense": > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > -- Albert Einstein > > end of quote. > Enough? No. Again: you cannot just show up and declare a huge body of knowledge "stupid" and be treated seriously. You said physics did not follow common sense, you back it up. A claim purporting to negate a vast body of human knowledge requires a bit more than cute one-liners. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 21:49 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mq324v$9ft$1@node1.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #359949 |
Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:a4be6916-cb88-45c7-aa3f-34e2edb6ae4b@googlegroups.com... On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 7:32:26 AM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:3f3c470a-0b31-4eb1-a4c5-8c19476b6d7b@googlegroups.com... > > > Dear Jan. > > And you didn't. > > Of course. > > |Sorry, the ball is in your court. You cannot just show up and declare > |a huge body of knowledge "stupid" and be treated seriously. You said > |physics did not follow common sense, you back it up. > > Do you really think I have a problem? > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > Best definition of "common sense": > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > -- Albert Einstein > > end of quote. > Enough? |No. Again: you cannot just show up and declare a huge body of knowledge |"stupid" and be treated seriously. You said physics did not follow common |sense, you back it up. Ok. I'm talking to a complete idiot, so, let it be, again. Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): Best definition of "common sense": “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” -- Albert Einstein end of quote. Do you understand, what is written here?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 16:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3ce35cc5-8319-4bc0-9bb1-e53373aebfd5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #359954 |
On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 12:49:53 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:a4be6916-cb88-45c7-aa3f-34e2edb6ae4b@googlegroups.com... > > On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 7:32:26 AM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > > dyskusyjnych:3f3c470a-0b31-4eb1-a4c5-8c19476b6d7b@googlegroups.com... > > > > > Dear Jan. > > > And you didn't. > > > Of course. > > > > |Sorry, the ball is in your court. You cannot just show up and declare > > |a huge body of knowledge "stupid" and be treated seriously. You said > > |physics did not follow common sense, you back it up. > > > > Do you really think I have a problem? > > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > > > Best definition of "common sense": > > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > > -- Albert Einstein > > > > end of quote. > > Enough? > > |No. Again: you cannot just show up and declare a huge body of knowledge > |"stupid" and be treated seriously. You said physics did not follow common > |sense, you back it up. > > Ok. I'm talking to a complete idiot, so, let it be, again. > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > Best definition of "common sense": > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > -- Albert Einstein > end of quote. > > Do you understand, what is written here? Again: you cannot just show up and declare a huge body of knowledge "stupid" and be treated seriously. You said physics did not follow common sense, you back it up. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 19:31 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mq5ed5$8s3$1@node2.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #359969 |
Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:3ce35cc5-8319-4bc0-9bb1-e53373aebfd5@googlegroups.com... On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 12:49:53 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:a4be6916-cb88-45c7-aa3f-34e2edb6ae4b@googlegroups.com... > > On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 7:32:26 AM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > > dyskusyjnych:3f3c470a-0b31-4eb1-a4c5-8c19476b6d7b@googlegroups.com... > > > > > Dear Jan. > > > And you didn't. > > > Of course. > > > > |Sorry, the ball is in your court. You cannot just show up and declare > > |a huge body of knowledge "stupid" and be treated seriously. You said > > |physics did not follow common sense, you back it up. > > > > Do you really think I have a problem? > > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > > > Best definition of "common sense": > > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > > -- Albert Einstein > > > > end of quote. > > Enough? > > |No. Again: you cannot just show up and declare a huge body of knowledge > |"stupid" and be treated seriously. You said physics did not follow common > |sense, you back it up. > > Ok. I'm talking to a complete idiot, so, let it be, again. > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > Best definition of "common sense": > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > -- Albert Einstein > end of quote. > > Do you understand, what is written here? |Again: you cannot just show up and declare a huge body of knowledge |"stupid" and be treated seriously. You said physics did not follow common |sense, you back it up. Ok. I'm talking to a complete idiot, so, let it be, again. Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): Best definition of "common sense": “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” -- Albert Einstein end of quote.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 19:52 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mq5flu$a5k$1@node2.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #360024 |
Użytkownik "Maciej Woźniak" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:mq5ed5$8s3$1@node2.news.atman.pl... Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:3ce35cc5-8319-4bc0-9bb1-e53373aebfd5@googlegroups.com... On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 12:49:53 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:a4be6916-cb88-45c7-aa3f-34e2edb6ae4b@googlegroups.com... > > On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 7:32:26 AM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > > dyskusyjnych:3f3c470a-0b31-4eb1-a4c5-8c19476b6d7b@googlegroups.com... > > > > > Dear Jan. > > > And you didn't. > > > Of course. > > > > |Sorry, the ball is in your court. You cannot just show up and declare > > |a huge body of knowledge "stupid" and be treated seriously. You said > > |physics did not follow common sense, you back it up. > > > > Do you really think I have a problem? > > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > > > Best definition of "common sense": > > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > > -- Albert Einstein > > > > end of quote. > > Enough? > > |No. Again: you cannot just show up and declare a huge body of knowledge > |"stupid" and be treated seriously. You said physics did not follow common > |sense, you back it up. > > Ok. I'm talking to a complete idiot, so, let it be, again. > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > Best definition of "common sense": > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > -- Albert Einstein > end of quote. > > Do you understand, what is written here? |Again: you cannot just show up and declare a huge body of knowledge |"stupid" and be treated seriously. You said physics did not follow common |sense, you back it up. Man. Your insane fellows are yelling, that common sense is a collection of prejudices, and you want a proof, that they're not following it. Mn. You're really an idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 11:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a893d04e-0d9d-4e48-8fdd-732fbc4f43fa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #360025 |
On Saturday, August 8, 2015 at 10:53:04 AM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "Maciej Woźniak" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:mq5ed5$8s3$1@node2.news.atman.pl... > > > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:3ce35cc5-8319-4bc0-9bb1-e53373aebfd5@googlegroups.com... > > On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 12:49:53 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > > dyskusyjnych:a4be6916-cb88-45c7-aa3f-34e2edb6ae4b@googlegroups.com... > > > > On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 7:32:26 AM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > > > dyskusyjnych:3f3c470a-0b31-4eb1-a4c5-8c19476b6d7b@googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > Dear Jan. > > > > And you didn't. > > > > Of course. > > > > > > |Sorry, the ball is in your court. You cannot just show up and declare > > > |a huge body of knowledge "stupid" and be treated seriously. You said > > > |physics did not follow common sense, you back it up. > > > > > > Do you really think I have a problem? > > > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > > > > > Best definition of "common sense": > > > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > > > -- Albert Einstein > > > > > > end of quote. > > > Enough? > > > > |No. Again: you cannot just show up and declare a huge body of knowledge > > |"stupid" and be treated seriously. You said physics did not follow common > > |sense, you back it up. > > > > Ok. I'm talking to a complete idiot, so, let it be, again. > > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > > > Best definition of "common sense": > > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > > -- Albert Einstein > > end of quote. > > > > Do you understand, what is written here? > > |Again: you cannot just show up and declare a huge body of knowledge > |"stupid" and be treated seriously. You said physics did not follow common > |sense, you back it up. > > Man. Your insane fellows are yelling, that common sense > is a collection of prejudices, and you want a proof, that > they're not following it. > Mn. You're really an idiot. You came here and stated flatly that all physicists in the world were idiots. You also stated that there was no common sense in physics. I simply responded that if someone wants to make claims of this type (namely, negating about 200 years of scientific knowledge accumulated around the world), then something else was necessary than cute one-liners. For starters, a clarification of what you mean by "common sense" and why such definition would be applicable to science. So applicable, in fact, that one could conclude what I quoted in the first two sentences above. A line of Einstein's humour is not enough, I'm afraid. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 22:05 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mq5net$hvp$1@node2.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #360036 |
Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:a893d04e-0d9d-4e48-8fdd-732fbc4f43fa@googlegroups.com... On Saturday, August 8, 2015 at 10:53:04 AM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "Maciej Woźniak" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:mq5ed5$8s3$1@node2.news.atman.pl... > > > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:3ce35cc5-8319-4bc0-9bb1-e53373aebfd5@googlegroups.com... > > On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 12:49:53 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > > dyskusyjnych:a4be6916-cb88-45c7-aa3f-34e2edb6ae4b@googlegroups.com... > > > > On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 7:32:26 AM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > > > dyskusyjnych:3f3c470a-0b31-4eb1-a4c5-8c19476b6d7b@googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > Dear Jan. > > > > And you didn't. > > > > Of course. > > > > > > |Sorry, the ball is in your court. You cannot just show up and declare > > > |a huge body of knowledge "stupid" and be treated seriously. You said > > > |physics did not follow common sense, you back it up. > > > > > > Do you really think I have a problem? > > > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > > > > > Best definition of "common sense": > > > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age > > > eighteen” > > > -- Albert Einstein > > > > > > end of quote. > > > Enough? > > > > |No. Again: you cannot just show up and declare a huge body of knowledge > > |"stupid" and be treated seriously. You said physics did not follow > > common > > |sense, you back it up. > > > > Ok. I'm talking to a complete idiot, so, let it be, again. > > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > > > Best definition of "common sense": > > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > > -- Albert Einstein > > end of quote. > > > > Do you understand, what is written here? > > |Again: you cannot just show up and declare a huge body of knowledge > |"stupid" and be treated seriously. You said physics did not follow common > |sense, you back it up. > > Man. Your insane fellows are yelling, that common sense > is a collection of prejudices, and you want a proof, that > they're not following it. > Mn. You're really an idiot. |You came here and stated flatly that all physicists in the world were idiots. I know, what I stated. |You also stated that there was no common sense in physics. I simply responded |that if someone wants to make claims of this type (namely, negating about |200 years of scientific knowledge accumulated around the world), then something Not 200. Just 110. Since your moronic guru started his insane crusade against common sense. And, still, there is some useful info in it. idiotproofness of science is really amazing. |else was necessary than cute one-liners. For starters, a clarification |of what you mean by "common sense" and why such definition And - what is "definition", poor idiot? |to science. So applicable, in fact, that one could conclude what I quoted in the first |two sentences above. I've told you already. Well, I've told it to your fellow Bodkin in one of the posts you answerred. Of course, as poor idiot, tou're unable to understand, what sane people are telling you. Too bad for you. |A line of Einstein's humour is not enough, I'm afraid. You're a fanatic moron. Nothing will be enough for you, I'm afraid. Your insane fellows are yelling, than common sense is a collection of prejudices, and you want a proof, they're not following it. Well, could expect something like this from a relativistic moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Emmerich Schultheiß <emme@noemail.thx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 18:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mq5gbg$k86$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #360024 |
Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Ok. I'm talking to a complete idiot, so, let it be, again. > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > Best definition of "common sense": > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > -- Albert Einstein end of quote. Well, here is where Einy was definitely wrong. It takes actually centuries to acquire the right commons sense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 06:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f45a76fb-eaa2-4187-a474-33d998cbd21c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #359954 |
On Friday, August 7, 2015 at 1:49:53 PM UTC-6, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > Ok. I'm talking to a complete idiot, Wozniak, you ARE a complete idiot ... or a troll. You choose. > Quoting your fellow Gary (quoting your poor idiot Guru): > > Best definition of "common sense": > “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > -- Albert Einstein > end of quote. > > Do you understand, what is written here? Obviously, you don't ... or you are just dishonest. I believe it's the latter, but it doesn't matter because trolls are also profoundly stupid. Is life really, really tough for you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 12:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <231d6482-b9ae-4822-8e3a-9cb000384a3c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #359834 |
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 1:06:15 PM UTC-6, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:b6e7b69f-361c-4392-a454-8dd93a71c906@googlegroups.com... > > > |No, it's a lie designed to belittle people you had no success arguing > |with honestly. > > Yes, it's a truth designed to describe people immune to any > honest arguing. That would be describing the dishonest troll, Maciej Woźniak, because he is certainly a moron about things relativistic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 21:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mq0cv0$8mv$1@node2.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #359839 |
Użytkownik "Gary Harnagel" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:231d6482-b9ae-4822-8e3a-9cb000384a3c@googlegroups.com... > Yes, it's a truth designed to describe people immune to any > honest arguing. |That would be describing the dishonest troll, Maciej Woźniak, because |he is certainly a moron about things relativistic. No, that would be describing relativistic morons, ignoring not only common sense, but also their own definitions and their own moronic standards.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 12:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <110a9ddb-1dbe-4f8e-a8ac-4d004df0f2fe@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #359845 |
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 12:36:02 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "Gary Harnagel" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:231d6482-b9ae-4822-8e3a-9cb000384a3c@googlegroups.com... > > > Yes, it's a truth designed to describe people immune to any > > honest arguing. > > |That would be describing the dishonest troll, Maciej Woźniak, because > |he is certainly a moron about things relativistic. > > No, that would be describing relativistic morons, ignoring > not only common sense, but also their own definitions and their > own moronic standards. BTW, this is the type of content Maciej posts here all the time. Draw your own conclusions. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 21:48 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mq0dn0$9i8$1@node2.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #359846 |
Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:110a9ddb-1dbe-4f8e-a8ac-4d004df0f2fe@googlegroups.com... On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 12:36:02 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "Gary Harnagel" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:231d6482-b9ae-4822-8e3a-9cb000384a3c@googlegroups.com... > > > Yes, it's a truth designed to describe people immune to any > > honest arguing. > > |That would be describing the dishonest troll, Maciej Woźniak, because > |he is certainly a moron about things relativistic. > > No, that would be describing relativistic morons, ignoring > not only common sense, but also their own definitions and their > own moronic standards. |BTW, this is the type of content Maciej posts here all the time. |Draw your own conclusions. It's really not my fault, that you're a bunch of morons ignoring not only common sense, but also yourr own definitions and your own moronic standards.-
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 12:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1764ea8e-3086-4992-8a8e-8f0264e88c8b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #359849 |
On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 12:48:51 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:110a9ddb-1dbe-4f8e-a8ac-4d004df0f2fe@googlegroups.com... > > On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 12:36:02 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > Użytkownik "Gary Harnagel" napisał w wiadomości grup > > dyskusyjnych:231d6482-b9ae-4822-8e3a-9cb000384a3c@googlegroups.com... > > > > > Yes, it's a truth designed to describe people immune to any > > > honest arguing. > > > > |That would be describing the dishonest troll, Maciej Woźniak, because > > |he is certainly a moron about things relativistic. > > > > No, that would be describing relativistic morons, ignoring > > not only common sense, but also their own definitions and their > > own moronic standards. > > |BTW, this is the type of content Maciej posts here all the time. > |Draw your own conclusions. > > It's really not my fault, that you're a bunch of morons ignoring > not only common sense, but also yourr own definitions and > your own moronic standards.- This is just a childish rant. No content as usual. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 20:12 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mptjnf$g9c$1@node2.news.atman.pl> |
| In reply to | #359746 |
Użytkownik "paparios" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:f3b2936b-f5e0-45e2-af5e-375d7d8deee4@googlegroups.com... |a black hole (such as the one at the Milky Way center). And, Sagittarius A is, of course, a sure black hole. We can be absolutely sure, as it's a strong source of electromagnetical waves, exactly, as Ingenious Shit describes a black hole should be.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-05 08:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7e8bef36-e65b-4dc5-85a2-d133a520aaa7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #359701 |
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 8:28:12 AM UTC-6, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > Użytkownik "Gary Harnagel" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:90f0f71b-f3c7-4ccb-9d3b-f6d1f25ba803@googlegroups.com... > > > |Wanker Wozniak passes the buck again because he is a clueless loser. Best > |definition of "common sense": > |“Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen” > | -- Albert Einstein > > Unfortunately, your poor idiot guru didn't noticed, that > "lack of common sense" and "stupidity" - are just two > different names of the same thing. > He was never good at common language and its rules. Neither are you, Wimpy Wozniak :-))
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-04 15:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3b2c82c0-3f44-4663-be1c-84b08ad227a5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #359638 |
On Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 12:54:20 PM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:537af927-6d20-4fbe-9c4f-2d7551fe1633@googlegroups.com... > > On Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 7:38:46 AM UTC-7, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > > dyskusyjnych:b9d18662-7cec-4d69-b073-3642d1bd3554@googlegroups.com... > > > > > |In any situation any observer can choose any coordinate system. One > > > then > > > |has to calculate the transformation corresponding to the given systems. > > > |In the special case of both systems being inertial, the corresponding > > > |transformation is always of a certain fixed type called "Lorentz > > > |transformation". > > > > > > Remember though, that you're not describing real observers > > > and real coordinate systems. You describe "certain abstract > > > (mostly mathematical) models of what you consider phenomenal > > > reality". > > > > |Nevertheless, this is how physics has always been done, beginning > > |with Newton and e.g. his "point mass" which is likewise "certain > > |abstract (mostly mathematical) model". This sort of thing is not > > |considered a defect in natural sciences. > > > > This sort of things is obvious in building models. But, unfortunately, > > to work it requires a lot of common sense. When used without > > common sense, it results with a useless shit. > > |Define "common sense". > > Gladly, after you define "define". OK, so you have nothing to say, you just enjoy yelling at people. Glad I've finally understood your position, it was like pulling teeth too. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web