Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #358441 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 156 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-23 12:11 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-23 18:08 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-23 20:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 00:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:53 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 11:57 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-24 16:58 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 18:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-24 18:32 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 00:20 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 06:42 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-26 11:03 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:08 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-28 18:24 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-28 17:25 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-26 03:54 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-27 04:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:09 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-29 03:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-29 07:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-30 15:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:00 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:17 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:32 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 09:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 11:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 10:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-02 11:51 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 12:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 12:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-02 14:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-02 15:05 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-02 16:12 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-08-02 10:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 16:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. David DeLaney <daviddelaney@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-03 03:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-03 09:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-03 18:39 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:01 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-04 15:36 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:55 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-03 17:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-04 18:54 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:57 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-05 12:56 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-08-06 19:27 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-06 17:44 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 05:23 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:46 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:04 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:49 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:12 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:44 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 13:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:06 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:51 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 01:10 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 20:42 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 22:28 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:07 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:14 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-06 23:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-08-07 09:18 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 16:19 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:21 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 22:26 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 00:00 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-07 05:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-07 15:42 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-07 15:48 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:26 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:31 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-04 05:16 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-05 04:46 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-05 14:00 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-06 05:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-08 04:35 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-29 11:15 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-29 13:56 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-29 18:59 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-30 06:43 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:11 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-30 11:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-31 04:03 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-31 04:14 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:34 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-31 10:19 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-07-31 12:06 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 21:52 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 00:56 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-07-31 22:22 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-31 22:32 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 01:55 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-01 12:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:39 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-08-01 07:38 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-30 04:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 11:59 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-24 16:27 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-25 10:32 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 09:07 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:03 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:15 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-26 10:09 +0100
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:08 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:11 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 06:36 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:04 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-25 11:31 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:45 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. bilgat@m.nu - 2015-07-25 17:23 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-07-25 10:46 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:19 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 15:13 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-26 13:20 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:10 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> - 2015-07-26 15:19 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-26 15:29 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:14 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2015-07-26 22:45 -0400
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> - 2015-07-28 16:13 -0500
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-07-26 23:03 -0600
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-27 18:43 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 00:39 -0700
Re: Atheism is based on beliefs, not science. Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2015-07-24 04:25 -0400
Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 Next page →
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-06 05:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <au86salf6vuuirkccdn8hol5cj0lbi7pj9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359752 |
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:00:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <99n4sap89chr4ckc8dvmiv438r6hpd7otn@4ax.com> wrote: >>You have never ever given me anything except to occasionally babble >>"everything', which is hardly a rational answer. > >You are saturated out. You can't grasp any more. > >>But I stopped expecting rational answers or comments from you long >>ago. Much like the one above. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-07 16:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <h6aasahjll2s2ogo64pmd86t0bmkbqs461@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359797 |
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:07:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:00:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >alt.atheism with message-id ><99n4sap89chr4ckc8dvmiv438r6hpd7otn@4ax.com> wrote: > >>>You have never ever given me anything except to occasionally babble >>>"everything', which is hardly a rational answer. >> >>You are saturated out. You can't grasp any more. >> >>>But I stopped expecting rational answers or comments from you long >>>ago. > >Much like the one above. I win, you lose. the dukester, American-American ***** "The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer." Pope Paul VI *****
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-08 04:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1jfbsa19so5rgdculkkc3p99cjam00fpj6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359965 |
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:53:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <h6aasahjll2s2ogo64pmd86t0bmkbqs461@4ax.com> wrote: >On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:07:40 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:00:34 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> in >>alt.atheism with message-id >><99n4sap89chr4ckc8dvmiv438r6hpd7otn@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>>You have never ever given me anything except to occasionally babble >>>>"everything', which is hardly a rational answer. >>> >>>You are saturated out. You can't grasp any more. >>> >>>>But I stopped expecting rational answers or comments from you long >>>>ago. >> >>Much like the one above. > >I win, you lose. > Is a contest of come kind involved? -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-29 11:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <d1sg0vFdsoqU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #358989 |
Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >guaranteed above average income for every person. I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular country or region. -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-29 13:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6b8irap373cue0oe9p15hv2egjqlr5m8kc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359023 |
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:04 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>guaranteed above average income for every person. > >I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular >country or region. Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population were below average intelligence? A Quayle in the hand is worth two in the Bush.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | talishi <talishi@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-29 18:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mpc0ej01lhg@news3.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #359031 |
On 07/29/2015 11:56 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population > were below average intelligence? Quayle was Pappy Bush's impeachment insurance. McCain tried the same gambit with Palin, but it was moot since Mr. Obama won the election
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-30 06:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <da3kra5ksr9a7u9n18s28n1uvgh7r4nr3c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359077 |
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 18:59:35 -0700, talishi <talishi@example.net> wrote: >On 07/29/2015 11:56 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote: >> Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population >> were below average intelligence? > >Quayle was Pappy Bush's impeachment insurance. McCain tried the same >gambit with Palin, but it was moot since Mr. Obama won the election Bush should have been impeached, for his role in Iran/Contra even before Reagan was elected, for conspiring with the Ayatollahs to keep the hostages until the inauguration.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-30 04:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <r0njrah069qo7qbar79382vbuhgb2vdb9o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359031 |
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:56:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <6b8irap373cue0oe9p15hv2egjqlr5m8kc@4ax.com> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:04 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: > >>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >> >>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>guaranteed above average income for every person. >> >>I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular >>country or region. > >Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population >were below average intelligence? > >A Quayle in the hand is worth two in the Bush. FINALLY some actually got it. Good for you. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-30 11:38 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m5hkrad05obk83vjbft734m7dn4a3dusdv@reader80.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #359090 |
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 04:11:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:56:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee ><c.lee@fairpoint.net> in alt.atheism with message-id ><6b8irap373cue0oe9p15hv2egjqlr5m8kc@4ax.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:04 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >> >>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>> >>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. >>> >>>I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular >>>country or region. >> >>Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population >>were below average intelligence? >> >>A Quayle in the hand is worth two in the Bush. > >FINALLY some actually got it. Good for you. Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke lifted from Garrison Keillor. -- My webpage is at http://www.watt-evans.com --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 04:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <tpamrahbhag8q59t7c49fp0oqt93i4pqne@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359106 |
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:38:22 -0400, Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <m5hkrad05obk83vjbft734m7dn4a3dusdv@reader80.eternal-september.org> wrote: >On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 04:11:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >wrote: > >>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:56:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >><c.lee@fairpoint.net> in alt.atheism with message-id >><6b8irap373cue0oe9p15hv2egjqlr5m8kc@4ax.com> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:04 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >>> >>>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. >>>> >>>>I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular >>>>country or region. >>> >>>Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population >>>were below average intelligence? >>> >>>A Quayle in the hand is worth two in the Bush. >> >>FINALLY some actually got it. Good for you. > >Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke >lifted from Garrison Keillor. Since I have vaguely heard the name but have never heard/read/seen him I could hardly 'lift' anything from him could I? I am simply betting on the stupidity of the liberal left loons. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 04:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <oebmrap7oqlokmb8to7on6vfp1310i6d78@reader80.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #359168 |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:03:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:38:22 -0400, Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> >in alt.atheism with message-id ><m5hkrad05obk83vjbft734m7dn4a3dusdv@reader80.eternal-september.org> >wrote: > >>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 04:11:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:56:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>><c.lee@fairpoint.net> in alt.atheism with message-id >>><6b8irap373cue0oe9p15hv2egjqlr5m8kc@4ax.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:04 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. >>>>> >>>>>I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular >>>>>country or region. >>>> >>>>Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population >>>>were below average intelligence? >>>> >>>>A Quayle in the hand is worth two in the Bush. >>> >>>FINALLY some actually got it. Good for you. >> >>Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke >>lifted from Garrison Keillor. > >Since I have vaguely heard the name but have never heard/read/seen him >I could hardly 'lift' anything from him could I? Maybe not directly, but the introduction to every episode of his radio show, "A Prairie Home Companion," described the imaginary town of Lake Woebegon as a place where "all the children are above average." So you may have come up with it independently, but it's still a gag most of us heard a long time ago. -- My webpage is at http://www.watt-evans.com --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Attila <<prochoice@here.now> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-01 07:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ljbpratldm2kia9107lt39pbeq9g7tg23m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359169 |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:14:52 -0400, Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> in alt.atheism with message-id <oebmrap7oqlokmb8to7on6vfp1310i6d78@reader80.eternal-september.org> wrote: >On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:03:05 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >wrote: > >>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:38:22 -0400, Lawrence Watt-Evans <lwe@sff.net> >>in alt.atheism with message-id >><m5hkrad05obk83vjbft734m7dn4a3dusdv@reader80.eternal-september.org> >>wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 04:11:42 -0400, Attila <<prochoice@here.now> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:56:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee >>>><c.lee@fairpoint.net> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>><6b8irap373cue0oe9p15hv2egjqlr5m8kc@4ax.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:15:04 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. >>>>>> >>>>>>I've never understood how the "poverty line" is set for a particular >>>>>>country or region. >>>>> >>>>>Remember how Dan Quayle lamented the fact that half the population >>>>>were below average intelligence? >>>>> >>>>>A Quayle in the hand is worth two in the Bush. >>>> >>>>FINALLY some actually got it. Good for you. >>> >>>Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke >>>lifted from Garrison Keillor. >> >>Since I have vaguely heard the name but have never heard/read/seen him >>I could hardly 'lift' anything from him could I? > >Maybe not directly, but the introduction to every episode of his radio >show, "A Prairie Home Companion," described the imaginary town of Lake >Woebegon as a place where "all the children are above average." > >So you may have come up with it independently, but it's still a gag >most of us heard a long time ago. Thus proving there is nothing new under the sun. I don't consider it a gag - I consider it an accurate representation of the Loony Left. -- Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent. Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying, especially those proposed by His Imperial Majesty Emperor Ass. Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government guaranteed above average income for every person. Every illegal alien is a criminal. No amnesty or work permit under any name or for any reason. Deportation upon identification as the only option. If you must text and drive please kill yourself quickly before you run into me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 10:19 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <d21lhsFn46vU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #359168 |
Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. >>Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke >>lifted from Garrison Keillor. > >Since I have vaguely heard the name but have never heard/read/seen him >I could hardly 'lift' anything from him could I? Garrison Keillor had a radio show, and one of his ongoing schticks was describing events in a town where "all the children were above average". The joke has traveled a lot further than the rest of his fame, and gets paraphrased by many people who don't know him. -- We are geeks. Resistance is voltage over current.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 12:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0lanra90ov7fqhg2bit0li3aq9udcpi401@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #359222 |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:19:44 -0600, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote: >Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: > >>>>>>Attila <<prochoice@here.now> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Any day now I expect some liberal to demand a government >>>>>>>guaranteed above average income for every person. > >>>Some of us got it all along but saw no need to comment on a lame joke >>>lifted from Garrison Keillor. >> >>Since I have vaguely heard the name but have never heard/read/seen him >>I could hardly 'lift' anything from him could I? > >Garrison Keillor had a radio show, and one of his ongoing schticks was >describing events in a town where "all the children were above >average". The joke has traveled a lot further than the rest of his >fame, and gets paraphrased by many people who don't know him. Dan Quayle wasn't joking. He was a complete idiot - on another occasion he said he wished he'd learned Latin so he could speak the local language in Latin America.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 21:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55BC5087.21BA@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #359226 |
pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:06:15 AM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > > > Dan Quayle wasn't joking. He was a complete idiot - on another > > occasion he said he wished he'd learned Latin so he could speak the > > local language in Latin America. > > http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/d/dan_quayle.html I don't understand the problem...Dan Quayle like...latinas. Latin girls. Spanish girls. But yous always have a problem with...definitions. Lat·in 'latn/ noun 2. a native or inhabitant of a country whose language developed from Latin, especially a Latin American.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-01 00:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mphjel$jgl$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #359296 |
Le 2015-08-01 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: >> >> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:06:15 AM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: >> >>> Dan Quayle wasn't joking. He was a complete idiot - on another >>> occasion he said he wished he'd learned Latin so he could speak the >>> local language in Latin America. >> >> http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/d/dan_quayle.html > > > > I don't understand the problem...Dan Quayle like...latinas. Latin girls. Spanish girls. > > > But yous always have a problem with...definitions. > > > Lat·in > 'latn/ > noun > > 2. > a native or inhabitant of a country whose language developed from Latin, especially a Latin American. I hope you enjoy yourself. -- Olrik aa #1981 EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 22:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hlwdjsd2-1A8123.22221931072015@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #359297 |
In article <mphjel$jgl$6@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 2015-08-01 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : > > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > >> > >> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:06:15 AM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > >> > >>> Dan Quayle wasn't joking. He was a complete idiot - on another > >>> occasion he said he wished he'd learned Latin so he could speak the > >>> local language in Latin America. > >> > >> http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/d/dan_quayle.html > > > > > > > > I don't understand the problem...Dan Quayle like...latinas. Latin girls. > > Spanish girls. > > > > > > But yous always have a problem with...definitions. > > > > > > Lat·in > > 'latn/ > > noun > > > > 2. > > a native or inhabitant of a country whose language developed from Latin, > > especially a Latin American. > > I hope you enjoy yourself. I see Starfucker doesn't know the difference between Latin and languages derived from it. -- JD Iąve officially given up trying to find the bottom of the barrel that is Republican depravity.--Jidyom Rosario, Addicting Info
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-31 22:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55BC59F1.3BAB@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #359299 |
Jeanne Douglas wrote: > > In article <mphjel$jgl$6@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Le 2015-08-01 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : > > > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > >> > > >> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:06:15 AM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > > >> > > >>> Dan Quayle wasn't joking. He was a complete idiot - on another > > >>> occasion he said he wished he'd learned Latin so he could speak the > > >>> local language in Latin America. > > >> > > >> http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/d/dan_quayle.html > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand the problem...Dan Quayle like...latinas. Latin girls. > > > Spanish girls. > > > > > > > > > But yous always have a problem with...definitions. > > > > > > > > > Lat·in > > > 'latn/ > > > noun > > > > > > 2. > > > a native or inhabitant of a country whose language developed from Latin, > > > especially a Latin American. > > > > I hope you enjoy yourself. > > I see Starfucker doesn't know the difference between Latin and languages > derived from it. I don't fuck stars, i make stars... what are you thinking, ...Jeannne? Latin girls are Spanish girls. They speak Spanish, not Latin. In other words, Spanish girls don't speak Latin, they speak Spanish. Latin girls speak...Spanish. If a guy says he wish he knew how to speak Lating, he really means...Spanish. Comprende? chica chica chica...cha cha cha...salsa... I dance latin. I'm a latin dancer. What does that mean? I dance like the Romans do???? dumb dumb dumb. estupido!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-01 01:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mphmt8$u0j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #359300 |
<snip> You've just got your ticket to PARADISE! Enjoy it! Forever! I mean it!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-01 12:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <55BD2057.D57@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #359300 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Jeanne Douglas wrote: > > > > In article <mphjel$jgl$6@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Le 2015-08-01 00:52, The Starmaker a écrit : > > > > pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:06:15 AM UTC-7, Christopher A. Lee wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Dan Quayle wasn't joking. He was a complete idiot - on another > > > >>> occasion he said he wished he'd learned Latin so he could speak the > > > >>> local language in Latin America. > > > >> > > > >> http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/d/dan_quayle.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand the problem...Dan Quayle like...latinas. Latin girls. > > > > Spanish girls. > > > > > > > > > > > > But yous always have a problem with...definitions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Lat·in > > > > 'latn/ > > > > noun > > > > > > > > 2. > > > > a native or inhabitant of a country whose language developed from Latin, > > > > especially a Latin American. > > > > > > I hope you enjoy yourself. > > > > I see Starfucker doesn't know the difference between Latin and languages > > derived from it. > > I don't fuck stars, i make stars... > > what are you thinking, ...Jeannne? > > Latin girls are Spanish girls. They speak Spanish, not Latin. > > In other words, Spanish girls don't speak Latin, they speak Spanish. > > Latin girls speak...Spanish. > > If a guy says he wish he knew how to speak Lating, he really > means...Spanish. > > Comprende? > > chica chica chica...cha cha cha...salsa... > > I dance latin. I'm a latin dancer. What does that mean? I dance like the > Romans do???? dumb dumb dumb. estupido! I gotta go to ancient Rome to learn Latin dancing! MAMBO!!!! I always wondered what the Romans dance steps were like...dancing with the romans. Julius Ceasar was a salsa dancer! How come I'm finding out this stuff for the first time? Any Latin dancers out there?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web