Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #666892 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-10-25 11:36 -0700 |
| Last post | 2025-10-29 09:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 185 — 31 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-25 11:36 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Clifford Rompaeij <imrfl@jimji.nl> - 2025-10-25 19:10 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-10-26 08:11 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com> - 2025-10-26 12:05 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-10-29 09:10 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 13:56 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 08:57 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 09:05 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 09:12 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-10-30 08:47 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-10-30 09:15 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-10-30 09:17 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-29 11:26 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 11:48 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-30 10:03 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-10-31 07:47 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-01 08:20 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-10-26 08:08 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-26 21:58 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-26 22:27 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-27 11:27 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-27 08:36 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-28 10:55 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-28 21:09 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-28 21:23 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-28 22:44 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-30 22:21 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-30 22:01 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-30 22:09 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-30 22:31 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-30 22:42 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-31 13:29 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-31 15:50 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Tray Rooijakkers <oiiy@kakry.nl> - 2025-10-31 16:29 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-27 17:35 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-28 10:52 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-28 13:29 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-28 21:57 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-28 23:04 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-30 22:52 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-31 07:01 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-31 12:58 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-31 13:21 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-31 13:44 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-31 15:53 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Devyn Szczepanski <znpi@dypz.pl> - 2025-10-31 21:21 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-31 14:48 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-31 16:19 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-02 13:35 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-02 14:23 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-02 20:49 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Shirley Vassilopulos <lhv@oyelp.gr> - 2025-10-31 20:42 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-11-01 13:43 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-01 14:20 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Yoannes Brzezicki <ryan@ezbbyne.pl> - 2025-11-01 15:48 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-11-01 15:45 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-11-02 22:29 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-02 22:34 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-02 12:27 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-02 13:43 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-02 14:30 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Darling Belorusov <vgen@rrr.ru> - 2025-11-02 15:22 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-11-02 22:52 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-02 23:16 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-10-26 14:43 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-10-27 21:22 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 13:32 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 20:44 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 14:45 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 22:02 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-27 15:51 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 00:54 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 09:25 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-10-28 11:21 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 08:46 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 09:15 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-10-28 11:21 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Jeronimo Krakowski <konew@wnok.pl> - 2025-10-28 10:56 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-10-28 13:02 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Theron Gomolka <hkek@kn.pl> - 2025-10-28 14:03 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-27 21:42 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-10-29 09:32 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-29 20:29 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 13:40 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 13:47 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-29 13:54 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-29 23:23 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-10-30 09:11 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bosephis Von wegberg <sswni@ehbees.de> - 2025-10-30 15:35 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-10-31 19:43 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-10-31 20:28 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Wes Kaczka <cazc@as.pl> - 2025-10-31 20:29 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-01 08:04 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-01 12:15 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-01 14:26 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-01 09:48 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Arlen Abandonato <oe@alr.it> - 2025-11-01 18:16 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-02 08:30 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-02 22:33 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-03 08:09 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-03 15:22 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-03 15:36 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-26 11:28 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-26 12:37 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-26 13:52 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-26 14:00 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Delmar Sokolowski <esilo@komk.pl> - 2025-10-26 21:14 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-26 20:21 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-27 20:48 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-27 20:52 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-29 00:17 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-29 00:21 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-29 00:24 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-29 23:48 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-30 09:59 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-31 22:24 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-01 13:13 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-04 23:58 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-05 00:00 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-31 22:33 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-01 15:01 -0700
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-02 11:35 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-04 23:39 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-06 21:41 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-10 15:36 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-11 08:45 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-11 00:04 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-11-11 16:25 -0500
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-12 08:43 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-11-12 08:49 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-12 01:28 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-13 09:05 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Daven Babadzhanov <dan@av.ru> - 2025-11-13 12:45 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-14 11:19 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-14 11:54 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-14 20:28 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-16 12:25 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-17 09:03 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-12 09:28 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-12 11:20 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-13 09:44 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-13 10:20 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-11-13 07:35 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-13 10:03 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-11-13 16:55 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-17 09:17 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-11-23 20:57 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-23 13:13 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-23 15:51 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 15:05 -0500
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-11-25 08:56 -0500
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-23 14:27 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-24 10:09 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-13 10:41 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-17 09:36 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-11-17 11:17 -0500
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-17 09:36 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-18 08:24 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-18 11:20 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-13 09:15 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-17 09:33 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-17 00:38 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-17 00:51 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-18 11:10 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-18 09:33 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-21 11:42 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Yony Königsmann <nmn@imn.de> - 2025-11-17 11:54 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-13 09:30 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-13 09:08 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-17 09:25 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-11 08:31 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-11 09:44 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-11-11 18:18 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> - 2025-11-12 14:11 +1300
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-12 08:48 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-12 08:29 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2025-11-12 17:24 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-13 08:43 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2025-11-13 17:14 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-14 08:47 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-11-14 17:35 +0000
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-14 10:55 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-15 08:14 -0800
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-10-29 09:28 +0100
Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-10-29 09:20 +0100
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-25 11:36 -0700 |
| Subject | A House of Dynamite (2025) |
| Message-ID | <np5qfk1rr6l2f3s21v77tgmqq9trf0em50@4ax.com> |
In the 1940's the department of war the military, had the same problem... they sat around a table they had a conference and their solution was... Albert Einstein. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clifford Rompaeij <imrfl@jimji.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-25 19:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10dj7bg$3i640$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #666892 |
The Starmaker wrote: > In the 1940's the department of war the military, > had the same problem... > > they sat around a table they had a conference and their solution was... > Albert Einstein. albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-26 08:11 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mm5vj2Fjo37U7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #666893 |
Am Samstag000025, 25.10.2025 um 21:10 schrieb Clifford Rompaeij: > The Starmaker wrote: > >> In the 1940's the department of war the military, >> had the same problem... >> >> they sat around a table they had a conference and their solution was... >> Albert Einstein. > > albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he died 70 years ago. His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-26 12:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qKWypa0HRMql2cUupBUiH-E2OWI@jntp> |
| In reply to | #666897 |
Le 26/10/2025 à 08:06, Thomas Heger a écrit : > Am Samstag000025, 25.10.2025 um 21:10 schrieb Clifford Rompaeij: >> The Starmaker wrote: >> >>> In the 1940's the department of war the military, >>> had the same problem... >>> >>> they sat around a table they had a conference and their solution was... >>> Albert Einstein. >> >> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter > > Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he died > 70 years ago. > > His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and > 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a despicable person.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-29 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mme064F1jkU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #666900 |
Am Sonntag000026, 26.10.2025 um 13:05 schrieb Python: >>> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter >> >> Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he >> died 70 years ago. >> >> His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and >> 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. > > You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a > despicable person. > Look at this: https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/dr-albert-einstein-and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-nachrichtenfoto/517323960 To me it seems, that his 'wife' looked like a shaven and slightly smaller version of Einstein himself. TH >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-29 13:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <DObg_r4Jkza_9E609ZCeNUsPRKM@jntp> |
| In reply to | #666952 |
Le 29/10/2025 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit : > Am Sonntag000026, 26.10.2025 um 13:05 schrieb Python: > >>>> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter >>> >>> Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he >>> died 70 years ago. >>> >>> His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and >>> 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. >> >> You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a >> despicable person. >> > > Look at this: > > https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/dr-albert-einstein-and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-nachrichtenfoto/517323960 > > To me it seems, that his 'wife' looked like a shaven and slightly > smaller version of Einstein himself. > > > TH > >> I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty-headed animal, food trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-29 08:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <epKcnd9ZGvAapJ_0nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #666956 |
On 10/29/2025 06:56 AM, Python wrote: > Le 29/10/2025 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit : >> Am Sonntag000026, 26.10.2025 um 13:05 schrieb Python: >> >>>>> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter >>>> >>>> Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he >>>> died 70 years ago. >>>> >>>> His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and >>>> 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. >>> >>> You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a >>> despicable person. >>> >> >> Look at this: >> >> https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/dr-albert-einstein-and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-nachrichtenfoto/517323960 >> >> >> To me it seems, that his 'wife' looked like a shaven and slightly >> smaller version of Einstein himself. >> >> >> TH >> >>> > > I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty-headed animal, food > trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a > hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! Come now, these sorts of spews only demean the discussion, and knowledge-able and worldly types with wide experience among many cultures think it's childish and churlish, and furthermore somehow less than manly. Now, it may be so that Monty Python includes cultural artifacts of great relevance, yet when the Antiquities of Mexico and archaeology establish common cultural bonds from the meso-American to the meso-Potamian since the Bronze Age, and what may have been the Atlantic/Atlantean Sea-Bridge, such schisms as these are in poor form, as for example Einstein in his later years with his jazz-singer lover and his reference to Mohatma Ghandhi and his people would find these apocryphal accounts of his self less than well informed and indeed sometimes wrong, and, even if his true self was a hypocrite, it's only his theories and their true novelty that are entertained here. Now, it's much more fair to attack the mathematical and physical models that arrive at either inconstancy or nonsense, while still keeping the flavor of spirited personal discourse, I don't believe in Calvinism or Spinoza with regards to original sin and natural enemies, since it's not a sin to be a man, and there's a world where millions patiently work together computing the stoplights and exercising their independence every day, together, each. With regards to the Celestials or Chin'na, there are as many Confucians as revere Buddha as bow to the Shang, and as many who are multicultural as are homogenous. The racism and race-baiting/race-demonstration as it is, and I'll aver that I'm sort of a Euro-mutt while most entirely identifying as American in the patriotic while individualistic spirit, it takes all kinds, at some point for somebody like Voltaire, who may despise what you say while defending your right to say it. That said, about laughing-from and laughing-to and laughing-with and laughing-at, humor may involve both truth and shock, and the more the inured to one or the other are addicts whose switches get tripped only by the more extreme, they're using you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-29 09:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6G6dndRtjtnapp_0nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #666957 |
On 10/29/2025 08:57 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 10/29/2025 06:56 AM, Python wrote: >> Le 29/10/2025 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit : >>> Am Sonntag000026, 26.10.2025 um 13:05 schrieb Python: >>> >>>>>> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter >>>>> >>>>> Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he >>>>> died 70 years ago. >>>>> >>>>> His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and >>>>> 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. >>>> >>>> You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a >>>> despicable person. >>>> >>> >>> Look at this: >>> >>> https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/dr-albert-einstein-and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-nachrichtenfoto/517323960 >>> >>> >>> >>> To me it seems, that his 'wife' looked like a shaven and slightly >>> smaller version of Einstein himself. >>> >>> >>> TH >>> >>>> >> >> I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty-headed animal, food >> trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a >> hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! > > Come now, these sorts of spews only demean the discussion, > and knowledge-able and worldly types with wide experience > among many cultures think it's childish and churlish, > and furthermore somehow less than manly. > > Now, it may be so that Monty Python includes cultural artifacts > of great relevance, yet when the Antiquities of Mexico and > archaeology establish common cultural bonds from the > meso-American to the meso-Potamian since the Bronze Age, > and what may have been the Atlantic/Atlantean Sea-Bridge, > such schisms as these are in poor form, as for example > Einstein in his later years with his jazz-singer lover > and his reference to Mohatma Ghandhi and his people > would find these apocryphal accounts of his self > less than well informed and indeed sometimes wrong, > and, even if his true self was a hypocrite, > it's only his theories and their true novelty > that are entertained here. > > > Now, it's much more fair to attack the mathematical and physical > models that arrive at either inconstancy or nonsense, > while still keeping the flavor of spirited personal discourse, > I don't believe in Calvinism or Spinoza with regards to > original sin and natural enemies, since it's not a sin > to be a man, and there's a world where millions patiently > work together computing the stoplights and exercising > their independence every day, together, each. > > > With regards to the Celestials or Chin'na, there are as > many Confucians as revere Buddha as bow to the Shang, > and as many who are multicultural as are homogenous. > > The racism and race-baiting/race-demonstration as it is, > and I'll aver that I'm sort of a Euro-mutt while most > entirely identifying as American in the patriotic while > individualistic spirit, it takes all kinds, at some point > for somebody like Voltaire, who may despise what you say > while defending your right to say it. That said, > about laughing-from and laughing-to and laughing-with > and laughing-at, humor may involve both truth and shock, > and the more the inured to one or the other are addicts > whose switches get tripped only by the more extreme, > they're using you. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuYDKzky4z0 (Bill Withers, "Use Me")
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-29 09:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <OP2dnaAHKp1woZ_0nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #666958 |
On 10/29/2025 09:05 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 10/29/2025 08:57 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >> On 10/29/2025 06:56 AM, Python wrote: >>> Le 29/10/2025 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit : >>>> Am Sonntag000026, 26.10.2025 um 13:05 schrieb Python: >>>> >>>>>>> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he >>>>>> died 70 years ago. >>>>>> >>>>>> His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and >>>>>> 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. >>>>> >>>>> You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a >>>>> despicable person. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Look at this: >>>> >>>> https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/dr-albert-einstein-and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-nachrichtenfoto/517323960 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> To me it seems, that his 'wife' looked like a shaven and slightly >>>> smaller version of Einstein himself. >>>> >>>> >>>> TH >>>> >>>>> >>> >>> I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty-headed animal, food >>> trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a >>> hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! >> >> Come now, these sorts of spews only demean the discussion, >> and knowledge-able and worldly types with wide experience >> among many cultures think it's childish and churlish, >> and furthermore somehow less than manly. >> >> Now, it may be so that Monty Python includes cultural artifacts >> of great relevance, yet when the Antiquities of Mexico and >> archaeology establish common cultural bonds from the >> meso-American to the meso-Potamian since the Bronze Age, >> and what may have been the Atlantic/Atlantean Sea-Bridge, >> such schisms as these are in poor form, as for example >> Einstein in his later years with his jazz-singer lover >> and his reference to Mohatma Ghandhi and his people >> would find these apocryphal accounts of his self >> less than well informed and indeed sometimes wrong, >> and, even if his true self was a hypocrite, >> it's only his theories and their true novelty >> that are entertained here. >> >> >> Now, it's much more fair to attack the mathematical and physical >> models that arrive at either inconstancy or nonsense, >> while still keeping the flavor of spirited personal discourse, >> I don't believe in Calvinism or Spinoza with regards to >> original sin and natural enemies, since it's not a sin >> to be a man, and there's a world where millions patiently >> work together computing the stoplights and exercising >> their independence every day, together, each. >> >> >> With regards to the Celestials or Chin'na, there are as >> many Confucians as revere Buddha as bow to the Shang, >> and as many who are multicultural as are homogenous. >> >> The racism and race-baiting/race-demonstration as it is, >> and I'll aver that I'm sort of a Euro-mutt while most >> entirely identifying as American in the patriotic while >> individualistic spirit, it takes all kinds, at some point >> for somebody like Voltaire, who may despise what you say >> while defending your right to say it. That said, >> about laughing-from and laughing-to and laughing-with >> and laughing-at, humor may involve both truth and shock, >> and the more the inured to one or the other are addicts >> whose switches get tripped only by the more extreme, >> they're using you. >> >> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuYDKzky4z0 > > (Bill Withers, "Use Me") > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuYDKzky4z0 (James Brown, "Living in America")
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-30 08:47 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mmgj63FdgvhU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #666956 |
Am Mittwoch000029, 29.10.2025 um 14:56 schrieb Python: > Le 29/10/2025 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit : >> Am Sonntag000026, 26.10.2025 um 13:05 schrieb Python: >> >>>>> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter >>>> >>>> Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he >>>> died 70 years ago. >>>> >>>> His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and >>>> 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. >>> >>> You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a >>> despicable person. >>> >> >> Look at this: >> >> https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/dr-albert-einstein- >> and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-nachrichtenfoto/517323960 >> >> To me it seems, that his 'wife' looked like a shaven and slightly >> smaller version of Einstein himself. >> >> >> TH >> >>> > > I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty-headed animal, food > trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a > hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! Look at this picture of Elsa Einstein: https://media.gettyimages.com/id/530836804/de/foto/physicist-albert-einstein-with-his-wife-elsa-in-chicago.jpg and compare it with this one https://ihatedblackandwhitemovies.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/0_i5ly5k_p1qc2mfci.jpg?w=624 TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-30 09:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mmgkr4FdgvhU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #666970 |
Am Donnerstag000030, 30.10.2025 um 08:47 schrieb Thomas Heger: > Am Mittwoch000029, 29.10.2025 um 14:56 schrieb Python: >> Le 29/10/2025 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit : >>> Am Sonntag000026, 26.10.2025 um 13:05 schrieb Python: >>> >>>>>> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter >>>>> >>>>> Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he >>>>> died 70 years ago. >>>>> >>>>> His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and >>>>> 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. >>>> >>>> You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a >>>> despicable person. >>>> >>> >>> Look at this: >>> >>> https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/dr-albert-einstein- >>> and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-nachrichtenfoto/517323960 >>> >>> To me it seems, that his 'wife' looked like a shaven and slightly >>> smaller version of Einstein himself. >>> >>> >>> TH >>> >>>> >> >> I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty-headed animal, food >> trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a >> hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! > > Look at this picture of Elsa Einstein: > > https://media.gettyimages.com/id/530836804/de/foto/physicist-albert- > einstein-with-his-wife-elsa-in-chicago.jpg > > and compare it with this one > > https://ihatedblackandwhitemovies.com/wp-content/ > uploads/2020/07/0_i5ly5k_p1qc2mfci.jpg?w=624 > > this one: www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/physicist-albert-einstein-with-his-wife-elsa-in-nachrichtenfoto/530836804?adppopup=true
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-30 09:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mmgkvaFdgvhU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #666972 |
Am Donnerstag000030, 30.10.2025 um 09:15 schrieb Thomas Heger: > Am Donnerstag000030, 30.10.2025 um 08:47 schrieb Thomas Heger: >> Am Mittwoch000029, 29.10.2025 um 14:56 schrieb Python: >>> Le 29/10/2025 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit : >>>> Am Sonntag000026, 26.10.2025 um 13:05 schrieb Python: >>>> >>>>>>> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because >>>>>> he died 70 years ago. >>>>>> >>>>>> His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and >>>>>> 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. >>>>> >>>>> You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a >>>>> despicable person. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Look at this: >>>> >>>> https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/dr-albert- >>>> einstein- and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-nachrichtenfoto/517323960 >>>> >>>> To me it seems, that his 'wife' looked like a shaven and slightly >>>> smaller version of Einstein himself. >>>> >>>> >>>> TH >>>> >>>>> >>> >>> I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty-headed animal, food >>> trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a >>> hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! >> >> Look at this picture of Elsa Einstein: >> >> https://media.gettyimages.com/id/530836804/de/foto/physicist-albert- >> einstein-with-his-wife-elsa-in-chicago.jpg >> >> and compare it with this one >> >> https://ihatedblackandwhitemovies.com/wp-content/ >> uploads/2020/07/0_i5ly5k_p1qc2mfci.jpg?w=624 >> >> > this one: > > www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/physicist-albert-einstein- > with-his-wife-elsa-in-nachrichtenfoto/530836804?adppopup=true > and THAT one https://ihatedblackandwhitemovies.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/0_i5ly5k_p1qc2mfci.jpg?w=624 TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-29 11:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <rvm4gkh8hvj9u310dgk676lro0bi6knaag@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #666952 |
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 09:10:48 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: >Am Sonntag000026, 26.10.2025 um 13:05 schrieb Python: > >>>> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter >>> >>> Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he >>> died 70 years ago. >>> >>> His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and >>> 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. >> >> You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a >> despicable person. >> > >Look at this: >https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/dr-albert-einstein-and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-nachrichtenfoto/517323960 > >To me it seems, that his 'wife' looked like a shaven and slightly >smaller version of Einstein himself. i don't know about shaven, but couples tend to look alike... besides all women in German look like men. > > >TH > >>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-29 11:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c6qdnfFkLfM7_J_0nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #666961 |
On 10/29/2025 11:26 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 09:10:48 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> > wrote: > >> Am Sonntag000026, 26.10.2025 um 13:05 schrieb Python: >> >>>>> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter >>>> >>>> Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he >>>> died 70 years ago. >>>> >>>> His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and >>>> 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. >>> >>> You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a >>> despicable person. >>> >> >> Look at this: >> https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/dr-albert-einstein-and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-nachrichtenfoto/517323960 >> >> To me it seems, that his 'wife' looked like a shaven and slightly >> smaller version of Einstein himself. > > i don't know about shaven, but couples tend to look alike... > > besides all women in German look like men. > > >> >> >> TH >> >>> Not all Germans are such, either. When you listen to somebody like Quine on "necessity", you'll find his consideration of its ubiquity or lack thereof to be ignorant of, "possibility", then as with regards to the roles of negation on those contingencies, express and reserved. not necessarily so necessarily not so not possibly so possibly not so Similarly the double negatives introduce _always a third_, a direct contradiction to otherwise "tertium non datur". So, Starmaker's opinions of course are merely psychological projection, here as with regards to I guess that's inbreeding, not to comment necessarily on Einstein's inbreeding and it's so that most particular ethnicities of course are inbreeding themselves, and inbreeding doesn't always result pathology, where as well it's known the sexual reproduction itself is possibly necessary vis-a-vis necessary possibly, or, possible necessarily vis-a-vis necessarily possible, that not all Scots are sheep. It's kind of like Russell on "significance" and "isolation", Quine's "necessary" and "relevancy", one need not necessarily give any absolute sort character to that, at all. Not all comedians are funny. Some are clowns.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-30 10:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gd67gk5l1mgvvis6kvji0ebpb4dbg7uodk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #666961 |
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:26:19 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 09:10:48 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> >wrote: > >>Am Sonntag000026, 26.10.2025 um 13:05 schrieb Python: >> >>>>> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter >>>> >>>> Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he >>>> died 70 years ago. >>>> >>>> His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and >>>> 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. >>> >>> You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a >>> despicable person. >>> >> >>Look at this: >>https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/dr-albert-einstein-and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-nachrichtenfoto/517323960 >> >>To me it seems, that his 'wife' looked like a shaven and slightly >>smaller version of Einstein himself. > >i don't know about shaven, but couples tend to look alike... > >besides all women in Germany look like men. Are there any pretty girls in Germany? I mean really, they all look like Men. And the men look like fat pigs. Sgt Shultz suppose to represent all men in Germany, Right???? i know Nothingggggggggggggggg.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-31 07:47 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mmj42hFqlv1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #666976 |
Am Donnerstag000030, 30.10.2025 um 18:03 schrieb The Starmaker: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:26:19 -0700, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 09:10:48 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> >> wrote: >> >>> Am Sonntag000026, 26.10.2025 um 13:05 schrieb Python: >>> >>>>>> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter >>>>> >>>>> Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he >>>>> died 70 years ago. >>>>> >>>>> His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and >>>>> 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. >>>> >>>> You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a >>>> despicable person. >>>> >>> >>> Look at this: >>> https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/dr-albert-einstein-and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-nachrichtenfoto/517323960 >>> >>> To me it seems, that his 'wife' looked like a shaven and slightly >>> smaller version of Einstein himself. >> >> i don't know about shaven, but couples tend to look alike... >> >> besides all women in Germany look like men. > > > Are there any pretty girls in Germany? I mean really, they all look > like Men. And the men look like fat pigs. > The Germans rank quite low in the list of the most obese people in the world. Afaik the 'fattest' are people from Vanuatu. If German woman are beautiful that is mainly a question of taste. (I would say, there are a lot of beautiful people living in Germany.) Whether Elsa Einstein was beautiful, actually female and even German, that would be another question. I had assumed, that Einstein's vitae was actually fake and he was born as Swiss citizen and possibly not even a Jew. Possibly Billy Wilder knew this and created a persiflage of the picture of Albert and Elsa Einstein in the train in his film 'Some like it hot'. That's why Jack Lemmon wore the exact same (stupid) hat like Elsa did and looked with the same (stupid) expression into the very same direction. If so, Tony Curtis would be the counterpart to Albert Einstein, hence Wilder could have meant, that Einstein was gay (and Elsa a man). TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-11-01 08:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mmlqc3F9olhU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #666989 |
Am Freitag000031, 31.10.2025 um 07:47 schrieb Thomas Heger: > Am Donnerstag000030, 30.10.2025 um 18:03 schrieb The Starmaker: >> On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:26:19 -0700, The Starmaker >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 09:10:48 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Am Sonntag000026, 26.10.2025 um 13:05 schrieb Python: >>>> >>>>>>> albert einstine is a gay. He never undrestood my Divergent Matter >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, I had that impression, too, but wouldn't use 'is', because he >>>>>> died 70 years ago. >>>>>> >>>>>> His 'wife' looked a little too masculine for my taste and >>>>>> 'electrodynamics of moving bodies' could be misunderstood, too. >>>>> >>>>> You are not only a idiot and an hypocrite, Thomas. You also are a >>>>> despicable person. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Look at this: >>>> https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/dr-albert- >>>> einstein-and-his-wife-sailing-for-home-on-nachrichtenfoto/517323960 >>>> >>>> To me it seems, that his 'wife' looked like a shaven and slightly >>>> smaller version of Einstein himself. >>> >>> i don't know about shaven, but couples tend to look alike... >>> >>> besides all women in Germany look like men. >> >> >> Are there any pretty girls in Germany? I mean really, they all look >> like Men. And the men look like fat pigs. >> > The Germans rank quite low in the list of the most obese people in the > world. > > Afaik the 'fattest' are people from Vanuatu. > > If German woman are beautiful that is mainly a question of taste. > > (I would say, there are a lot of beautiful people living in Germany.) > > Whether Elsa Einstein was beautiful, actually female and even German, > that would be another question. > > I had assumed, that Einstein's vitae was actually fake and he was born > as Swiss citizen and possibly not even a Jew. > > Possibly Billy Wilder knew this and created a persiflage of the picture > of Albert and Elsa Einstein in the train in his film 'Some like it hot'. > > That's why Jack Lemmon wore the exact same (stupid) hat like Elsa did > and looked with the same (stupid) expression into the very same direction. > > If so, Tony Curtis would be the counterpart to Albert Einstein, hence > Wilder could have meant, that Einstein was gay (and Elsa a man). > I had manage to cripple both links. But it is essential to see both pictures at the same time. One is a press photo of Albert and Elsa Einstein in a train: https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/physicist-albert-einstein-with-his-wife-elsa-in-nachrichtenfoto/530836804?adppopup=true The other is a still from the film 'Some like it hot' by Billy Wilder: https://ihatedblackandwhitemovies.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/0_i5ly5k_p1qc2mfci.jpg?w=624 The funny thing is this: Elsa Einstein, Tony Curtis and Jack Lemmon wore the same hat! This could even be the physically identical hat, even if the hat from the film is decorated with an additional feather. Also the look and the gestures are very similar. Now you need to ask yourself this question: which one of these four people looks most feminin? The astonishing answer: Tony Curtis does, because he is obviously a professional actor. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-26 08:08 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mm5ve5Fjo37U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #666892 |
Am Samstag000025, 25.10.2025 um 20:36 schrieb The Starmaker: > In the 1940's > the department of war > the military, > had the same problem... > > they sat around a table > they had a conference > and their solution was... > Albert Einstein. No, Einstein came much earlier! But Einstein could have been a tiny cog in a huge system, which was meant to derail science in general. I actually assume, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' was meant as such a means, which intentionally tried to divert science from their supposed course. I think so, because that particular article contains an enormous amount of errors of all sorts. Some of them are actually comically stupid. So we had to include Max Planck into the story, because it was him, who published that article. And Max Planck was everything else but stupid. So how could Planck print such a piece of garbage and why???? It must be a HUGE scandal, which is still hidden and against which the general public has no means, because it would require time and knowledge, which common people do not have. So, we have also the question to solve, what made Einstein so famous in the 1920th and why nobody today dares to criticize that particular article. Hundreds if not thousands of books are written and printed about this particular article, but only a few address the errors in it. This doesn't look like science, but more like kind of 'social engineering'. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-26 21:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <8YvLQ.11714$SAa.11638@fx08.ams4> |
| In reply to | #666896 |
Den 26.10.2025 08:08, skrev Thomas Heger:
>
> But Einstein could have been a tiny cog in a huge system, which was
> meant to derail science in general.
>
> I actually assume, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' was
> meant as such a means, which intentionally tried to divert science from
> their supposed course.
>
> I think so, because that particular article contains an enormous amount
> of errors of all sorts.
>
> Some of them are actually comically stupid.
The metric below defines The Special Theory of Relativity (SR).
What can be deduced from this metric is what SR predicts.
(c⋅dτ)² = (c⋅dt)² − dx² − dy² − dz²
The theory Einstein defined in "On the electrodynamics of moving
bodies" is identical to the theory defined by the metric above.
No professional physicist will dispute that SR is a consistent theory.
(There have been physicists who have claimed that SR is inconsistent,
look up Herbert Dingle. But Dingle's arguments are long since proven
wrong.)
So we can consider it to be a fact that SR is a logically
consistent theory.
But the predictions of a logically consistent theory
do not have to be in accordance with measurements.
Only real experiments can show that.
Some of the experiments testing SR:
https://paulba.no/paper/Fizeau_by_Michelson.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Michelson_1887.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Ives_Stilwell.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Ives_Stilwell_II.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Frisch_Smith.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Brillet_Hall.pdf
Newtonian Mechanics (NM) and SR are both logically consistent
theories.
All the experiments above confirm SR, none falsify SR.
Most of the experiments above falsify NM.
(It takes but one experiment to falsify a theory.)
Now you can assume that all physicists are idiots, and
that all the experimental physicist who performed
the experiments are frauds who have faked their results.
That will make you look very smart.
>
> So we had to include Max Planck into the story, because it was him, who
> published that article.
Are you sure it wasn't Adolf Hitler who was the author of
"that article"?
>
> And Max Planck was everything else but stupid.
>
> So how could Planck print such a piece of garbage and why????
>
> It must be a HUGE scandal, which is still hidden and against which the
> general public has no means, because it would require time and
> knowledge, which common people do not have.
One can but be impressed by your ability to invent nonsense!
>
> So, we have also the question to solve, what made Einstein so famous in
> the 1920th and why nobody today dares to criticize that particular article.
Could it be because all knowledgeable persons know that SR is
a consistent theory which is thoroughly tested and never falsified?
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-10-26 22:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <187227b803841e56$12935562$3040052$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> |
| In reply to | #666904 |
On 10/26/2025 9:58 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Den 26.10.2025 08:08, skrev Thomas Heger: >> >> But Einstein could have been a tiny cog in a huge system, which was >> meant to derail science in general. >> >> I actually assume, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' was >> meant as such a means, which intentionally tried to divert science >> from their supposed course. >> >> I think so, because that particular article contains an enormous >> amount of errors of all sorts. >> >> Some of them are actually comically stupid. > > > The metric below defines The Special Theory of Relativity (SR). > What can be deduced from this metric is what SR predicts. Only such a mindless idiot can believe such an absurd lie, unfortunately. > But the predictions of a logically consistent theory Oh, the idiot's mumble was not a logically consistent theory > do not have to be in accordance with measurements. > Only real experiments can show that. and this is some bullshit too. > > Some of the experiments testing SR: Fortunately, even such a disgusting piece of lying shit as you are can't lie non stop, so sometimes you admit that the real measurement results have little in common with the delusions of your idiot guru.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 10 [1] 2 3 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web