Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #617956 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-08-16 17:38 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-08-29 09:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 358 — 36 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 17:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-17 12:05 +1000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 20:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 20:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-17 13:24 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-08-19 06:58 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:19 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 23:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-08-20 07:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 22:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 19:53 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 17:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 18:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 19:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 00:19 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 21:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 15:13 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:43 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 21:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 02:05 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 15:32 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 20:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:57 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:33 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:14 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 15:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-17 17:46 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 20:06 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 09:20 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 15:03 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:44 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-08-17 08:13 -0600
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:59 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:18 -0700
Cranks Richard Hertz and Laurence Crossen run out of arguments "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 09:37 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 20:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:12 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 23:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:44 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-18 12:45 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 04:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 14:32 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:00 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:54 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 16:49 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ben Harin <ianr@ninrbnnr.nn> - 2023-08-18 23:27 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:40 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 19:23 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:18 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:53 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:21 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Wayne Bereznevich <nwne@czewnebe.ze> - 2023-08-18 22:37 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:49 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Elton Vakar <eero@aklenaoo.av> - 2023-08-18 23:07 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Merlan Bauze <emeu@eabezeel.bn> - 2023-08-19 10:13 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-18 15:39 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:56 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 10:22 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 21:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 13:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-18 10:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-18 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 10:22 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:51 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 18:01 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 09:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 18:51 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 10:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 10:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 12:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 16:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:35 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:35 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 08:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 08:26 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:27 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 10:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 19:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 20:30 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 23:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 23:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 10:36 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 08:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 18:03 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 00:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 01:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 11:54 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 03:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 09:38 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 20:05 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 19:52 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 11:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 13:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-23 15:52 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-24 11:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 14:39 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-03 17:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 12:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 22:58 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 21:41 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 11:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 22:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 01:01 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 11:54 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 23:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 23:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 12:01 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 03:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 04:22 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 13:55 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 15:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-24 14:02 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 05:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 13:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Delmer Tupalo <rptm@lmlelodl.el> - 2023-08-20 18:44 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:29 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Travis Bazili <aail@ttttviat.sv> - 2023-08-23 09:38 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:48 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Clarence Talkovsky <nskl@eccaryec.kv> - 2023-08-23 11:53 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:26 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 10:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:32 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 15:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-24 14:02 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-24 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-25 21:45 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-19 11:22 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-20 11:52 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Brett Harkharov <aaah@rthtrath.rk> - 2023-08-19 17:12 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 08:08 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 02:50 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Chico Patsalo <tpac@slsialct.ac> - 2023-08-19 10:41 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:22 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 14:45 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 03:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 08:36 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 19:18 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 17:01 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-20 12:13 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 17:52 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 14:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 09:12 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 00:32 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 15:06 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 06:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:14 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:40 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Shon Babukh <koun@bnbuboab.ob> - 2023-08-18 23:38 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 20:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-18 13:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 15:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 20:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:37 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 12:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 13:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-20 01:55 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 19:19 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 15:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 16:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:20 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 19:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-20 07:07 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:59 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 12:39 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:25 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 20:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:03 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 00:35 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 21:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 10:36 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 22:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 10:03 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:50 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 17:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:34 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 22:42 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 15:30 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:12 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:41 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-21 19:11 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 18:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-21 23:33 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 22:24 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-22 09:58 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:19 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 22:25 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 10:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 11:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-22 14:06 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 22:17 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 23:20 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 21:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 10:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 00:44 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Colby Zolotar <bolr@obzooota.yr> - 2023-08-24 09:32 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 10:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 14:28 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 21:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 06:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:26 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 10:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 22:21 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-23 01:24 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 22:59 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-21 23:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-22 15:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-22 17:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Evenezer Peltser <etpv@pverreet.zz> - 2023-08-23 11:04 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-08-21 21:25 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 00:13 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 18:43 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:51 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:01 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:26 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:31 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 01:00 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Williard Bah <rhab@ihdiadrd.lw> - 2023-08-23 10:30 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:57 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Basil Hariton <athi@iaribinh.bo> - 2023-08-23 11:51 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 07:48 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 20:07 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 18:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 08:51 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 09:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-28 15:20 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-29 06:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-29 09:45 -0700
Page 15 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 Next page →
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-21 16:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3aac5dcb-5962-49b1-bdd4-8963aafa58e7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618512 |
On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 4:41:43 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > On 8/21/2023 5:05 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 9:36:04 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > >> And again, after 100+ years, there is NO such scientific observations or > >> experimental evidence discovered. None. > > > Please explain which twin is predicted to be time dilated when both are moving relative to the other and time dilation is caused by relative motion. > And again, you don't understand the twin paradox. Time dilation as > described in the 1905 paper only applies to inertial motion. And you can > apply it to the PORTIONS of the journey where one twin moves at a > constant speed relative to the other. However the turnaround > event/acceleration causes all of the effects which causes the traveling > twin to age less. It is NOT symmetrical. Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by inertial motion. How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-21 19:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8k6dnR43TbiGYH75nZ2dnZfqlJ9j4p2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #618513 |
On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by > inertial motion. No. "Cause" is the wrong word. See my next paragraph. > How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is perpendicular to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now rotate it so you are looking along its length -- it appears to have a width very much smaller than one meter. What "caused" this difference? -- however you answer, that same answer applies to "time dilation". [Both are geometrical projections of an invariant quantity onto a specific coordinate system.] > Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. Tom Roberts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-21 18:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c01d71c5-d87a-47c7-be8a-f1acfe42caccn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618517 |
On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 9:11:20 PM UTC-3, Tom Roberts wrote: <snip> > Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is perpendicular > to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now rotate it so you > are looking along its length -- it appears to have a width very much > smaller than one meter. What "caused" this difference? -- however you > answer, that same answer applies to "time dilation". Once again, you screw up biophysics. It depends on the angular velocity and the speed of processing of your visual system. If the rotation velocity is fast enough, you'll think that you're seeing a DISK surrounding you, and the walls vanish. This, of course, for a while. Then you start spinning aroud the room and throwing up, before you pass out and fall like a rock. Return your degree in physics. Better yet, burn it. .... > > Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. > Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many > particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very > ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. LIAR, DECEIVER. Try muons now.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-21 23:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6zmdnaydB800p3n5nZ2dnZfqlJ9j4p2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #618522 |
On 8/21/23 8:56 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 9:11:20 PM UTC-3, Tom Roberts wrote: >> Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is >> perpendicular to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now >> rotate it so you are looking along its length -- it appears to have >> a width very much smaller than one meter. What "caused" this >> difference? -- however you answer, that same answer applies to >> "time dilation". > > Once again, you screw up biophysics. Nope. YOU screw up reading very basic English. > It depends on the angular velocity and the speed of processing of > your visual system. My words QUITE CLEARLY indicate the meterstick is not moving while you look at it, twice, with a 90-degree rotation between looks. > [... further nonsense omitted] Tom Roberts
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-21 21:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <53feccfb-eb3f-4507-8896-d5bbf77edb09n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618536 |
On Tuesday, 22 August 2023 at 06:33:57 UTC+2, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 8/21/23 8:56 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 9:11:20 PM UTC-3, Tom Roberts wrote: > >> Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is > >> perpendicular to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now > >> rotate it so you are looking along its length -- it appears to have > >> a width very much smaller than one meter. What "caused" this > >> difference? -- however you answer, that same answer applies to > >> "time dilation". > > > > Once again, you screw up biophysics. > Nope. YOU screw up reading very basic English. And we're FORCED!!! To THE BEST WAY!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-21 20:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4cf1745f-17e1-4703-954d-c421bb04e039n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618517 |
On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by > > inertial motion. > No. "Cause" is the wrong word. See my next paragraph. > > How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? > Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is perpendicular > to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now rotate it so you > are looking along its length -- it appears to have a width very much > smaller than one meter. What "caused" this difference? -- however you > answer, that same answer applies to "time dilation". > > [Both are geometrical projections of an invariant > quantity onto a specific coordinate system.] > > Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. > Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many > particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very > ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. > > Tom Roberts I am very impressed by your ignorance of the criticisms of this interpretation of experiments in particle accelerators.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-21 20:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <17f27031-7230-4bbf-98b6-ec272dba818an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618523 |
On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:07:42 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: > > On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by > > > inertial motion. > > No. "Cause" is the wrong word. See my next paragraph. > > > How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? > > Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is perpendicular > > to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now rotate it so you > > are looking along its length -- it appears to have a width very much > > smaller than one meter. What "caused" this difference? -- however you > > answer, that same answer applies to "time dilation". > > > > [Both are geometrical projections of an invariant > > quantity onto a specific coordinate system.] > > > Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. > > Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many > > particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very > > ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. > > > > Tom Roberts > I am very impressed by your ignorance of the criticisms of this interpretation of experiments in particle accelerators. If you think that Tom, who has a Ph.D. in physics, is ignorant of experiments in particle accelerators, then you are among the dumbest people who *ever& visited this forum. It is YOUR ignorance that is huge! After all, Tom worked at Fermilab... https://www.fnal.gov/pub/about/index.html Could you possibly be a bigger fool than you are now?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-21 22:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kkio3iFat64U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618525 |
On 8/21/2023 10:13 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:07:42 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >> On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: >>> On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>>> Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by >>>> inertial motion. >>> No. "Cause" is the wrong word. See my next paragraph. >>>> How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? >>> Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is perpendicular >>> to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now rotate it so you >>> are looking along its length -- it appears to have a width very much >>> smaller than one meter. What "caused" this difference? -- however you >>> answer, that same answer applies to "time dilation". >>> >>> [Both are geometrical projections of an invariant >>> quantity onto a specific coordinate system.] >>>> Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. >>> Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many >>> particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very >>> ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. >>> >>> Tom Roberts > >> I am very impressed by your ignorance of the criticisms of this interpretation of experiments in particle accelerators. > > If you think that Tom, who has a Ph.D. in physics, is ignorant of experiments in particle accelerators, then you are among the dumbest people who *ever& visited this forum. It is YOUR ignorance that is huge! After all, Tom worked at Fermilab... > > https://www.fnal.gov/pub/about/index.html > > Could you possibly be a bigger fool than you are now? Watch this space...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-21 20:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <691fc2ad-a5b7-40f2-922b-9d45e94e9bdbn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618525 |
On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:13:45 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:07:42 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: > > > On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by > > > > inertial motion. > > > No. "Cause" is the wrong word. See my next paragraph. > > > > How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? > > > Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is perpendicular > > > to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now rotate it so you > > > are looking along its length -- it appears to have a width very much > > > smaller than one meter. What "caused" this difference? -- however you > > > answer, that same answer applies to "time dilation". > > > > > > [Both are geometrical projections of an invariant > > > quantity onto a specific coordinate system.] > > > > Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. > > > Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many > > > particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very > > > ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. > > > > > > Tom Roberts > > > I am very impressed by your ignorance of the criticisms of this interpretation of experiments in particle accelerators. > If you think that Tom, who has a Ph.D. in physics, is ignorant of experiments in particle accelerators, then you are among the dumbest people who *ever& visited this forum. It is YOUR ignorance that is huge! After all, Tom worked at Fermilab... > > https://www.fnal.gov/pub/about/index.html > > Could you possibly be a bigger fool than you are now? Poor Tom can't distinguish between a result and an irrational interpretation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-21 21:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7487ce37-8673-4fbd-9134-14b6b360497an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618532 |
On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:34:22 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:13:45 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:07:42 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: > > > > On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by > > > > > inertial motion. > > > > No. "Cause" is the wrong word. See my next paragraph. > > > > > How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? > > > > Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is perpendicular > > > > to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now rotate it so you > > > > are looking along its length -- it appears to have a width very much > > > > smaller than one meter. What "caused" this difference? -- however you > > > > answer, that same answer applies to "time dilation". > > > > > > > > [Both are geometrical projections of an invariant > > > > quantity onto a specific coordinate system.] > > > > > Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. > > > > Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many > > > > particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very > > > > ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. > > > > > > > > Tom Roberts > > > > > I am very impressed by your ignorance of the criticisms of this interpretation of experiments in particle accelerators. > > If you think that Tom, who has a Ph.D. in physics, is ignorant of experiments in particle accelerators, then you are among the dumbest people who *ever& visited this forum. It is YOUR ignorance that is huge! After all, Tom worked at Fermilab... > > > > https://www.fnal.gov/pub/about/index.html > > > > Could you possibly be a bigger fool than you are now? > Poor Tom can't distinguish between a result and an irrational interpretation. Poor Crossen doesn't know what he doesn't know and makes a fool of himself... AGAIN!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-21 21:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6bd0e1dd-e607-46c9-9eb1-697e320088e5n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618537 |
On Tuesday, 22 August 2023 at 06:41:32 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:34:22 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:13:45 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:07:42 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: > > > > > On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > > Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by > > > > > > inertial motion. > > > > > No. "Cause" is the wrong word. See my next paragraph. > > > > > > How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? > > > > > Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is perpendicular > > > > > to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now rotate it so you > > > > > are looking along its length -- it appears to have a width very much > > > > > smaller than one meter. What "caused" this difference? -- however you > > > > > answer, that same answer applies to "time dilation". > > > > > > > > > > [Both are geometrical projections of an invariant > > > > > quantity onto a specific coordinate system.] > > > > > > Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. > > > > > Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many > > > > > particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very > > > > > ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. > > > > > > > > > > Tom Roberts > > > > > > > I am very impressed by your ignorance of the criticisms of this interpretation of experiments in particle accelerators. > > > If you think that Tom, who has a Ph.D. in physics, is ignorant of experiments in particle accelerators, then you are among the dumbest people who *ever& visited this forum. It is YOUR ignorance that is huge! After all, Tom worked at Fermilab... > > > > > > https://www.fnal.gov/pub/about/index.html > > > > > > Could you possibly be a bigger fool than you are now? > > > Poor Tom can't distinguish between a result and an irrational interpretation. > Poor Crossen doesn't know what he doesn't know and makes a fool of himself... AGAIN! Come on, trash, stop making wise faces, the mumble of your idiot guru wasn't even consistent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-22 09:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kkk0o8Fh1mjU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618537 |
On 8/21/2023 11:41 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:34:22 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >> On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:13:45 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >>> On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:07:42 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>>> On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: >>>>> On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>>>>> Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by >>>>>> inertial motion. >>>>> No. "Cause" is the wrong word. See my next paragraph. >>>>>> How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? >>>>> Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is perpendicular >>>>> to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now rotate it so you >>>>> are looking along its length -- it appears to have a width very much >>>>> smaller than one meter. What "caused" this difference? -- however you >>>>> answer, that same answer applies to "time dilation". >>>>> >>>>> [Both are geometrical projections of an invariant >>>>> quantity onto a specific coordinate system.] >>>>>> Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. >>>>> Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many >>>>> particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very >>>>> ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. >>>>> >>>>> Tom Roberts >>> >>>> I am very impressed by your ignorance of the criticisms of this interpretation of experiments in particle accelerators. >>> If you think that Tom, who has a Ph.D. in physics, is ignorant of experiments in particle accelerators, then you are among the dumbest people who *ever& visited this forum. It is YOUR ignorance that is huge! After all, Tom worked at Fermilab... >>> >>> https://www.fnal.gov/pub/about/index.html >>> >>> Could you possibly be a bigger fool than you are now? > >> Poor Tom can't distinguish between a result and an irrational interpretation. > > Poor Crossen doesn't know what he doesn't know and makes a fool of himself... AGAIN! If you haven't figured it out yet you're talking to a third or fourth string mathematician.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-22 01:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <uc1ggb$2968k$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #618525 |
On 8/21/2023 11:13 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:07:42 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >> On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: [...] >>> Tom Roberts > >> I am very impressed by your ignorance of the criticisms of this interpretation of experiments in particle accelerators. > > If you think that Tom, who has a Ph.D. in physics, is ignorant of experiments in particle accelerators, then you are among the dumbest people who *ever& visited this forum. It is YOUR ignorance that is huge! After all, Tom worked at Fermilab... > > https://www.fnal.gov/pub/about/index.html > > Could you possibly be a bigger fool than you are now? Warning; Lawrence is likely to consider that as a challenge...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-21 22:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e52e4759-be16-494b-b352-f5b70c20cb62n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618541 |
On Tuesday, 22 August 2023 at 07:19:11 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > On 8/21/2023 11:13 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 8:07:42 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >> On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: > [...] > >>> Tom Roberts > > > >> I am very impressed by your ignorance of the criticisms of this interpretation of experiments in particle accelerators. > > > > If you think that Tom, who has a Ph.D. in physics, is ignorant of experiments in particle accelerators, then you are among the dumbest people who *ever& visited this forum. It is YOUR ignorance that is huge! After all, Tom worked at Fermilab... > > > > https://www.fnal.gov/pub/about/index.html > > > > Could you possibly be a bigger fool than you are now? > Warning; Lawrence is likely to consider that as a challenge... And do you still believe that 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy is some "Newton mode"? You're such an agnorant idiot, stupid Mike, even considering the standards of your moronic religion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-22 10:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <79be5867-2f28-4c9b-bf22-9996866e74ean@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618517 |
On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by > > inertial motion. > No. "Cause" is the wrong word. See my next paragraph. > > How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? > Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is perpendicular > to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now rotate it so you > are looking along its length -- it appears to have a width very much > smaller than one meter. What "caused" this difference? -- however you > answer, that same answer applies to "time dilation". > > [Both are geometrical projections of an invariant > quantity onto a specific coordinate system.] > > Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. > Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many > particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very > ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. > > Tom Roberts The particle accelerator experiment with Lithium merely measured the change in the number of transitions of electrons at one-third the speed of light compared with ions not moving. It only proved those transitions slowed. It did not prove that any other rate of change slows with speed much less that time itself (all rates of change) changes with speed. To conclude that it proves time changes with speed is an unwarranted inference, and math knowledge is irrelevant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-22 11:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dba71300-fced-4c4f-b562-463a4cfedec7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618517 |
On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: > On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by > > inertial motion. > No. "Cause" is the wrong word. See my next paragraph. > > How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? > Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is perpendicular > to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now rotate it so you > are looking along its length -- it appears to have a width very much > smaller than one meter. What "caused" this difference? -- however you > answer, that same answer applies to "time dilation". > > [Both are geometrical projections of an invariant > quantity onto a specific coordinate system.] > > Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. > Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many > particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very > ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. > > Tom Roberts It is extremely ignorant of you to jump to unwarranted conclusions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-22 14:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kkkf9oFjd3hU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618574 |
On 8/22/2023 1:28 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: >> On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>> Then I take your argument to be that time dilation is caused by >>> inertial motion. >> No. "Cause" is the wrong word. See my next paragraph. >>> How does it cause that? How does acceleration cause it? >> Hold a meterstick in your hand and look at it while it is perpendicular >> to your sight-line -- it appears one meter wide. Now rotate it so you >> are looking along its length -- it appears to have a width very much >> smaller than one meter. What "caused" this difference? -- however you >> answer, that same answer applies to "time dilation". >> >> [Both are geometrical projections of an invariant >> quantity onto a specific coordinate system.] >>> Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. >> Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many >> particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very >> ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. >> >> Tom Roberts > It is extremely ignorant of you to jump to unwarranted conclusions. All bun, no beef !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-22 22:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <uc3q8n$2oop5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #618574 |
On 8/22/2023 2:28 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: >> On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>> Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. >> Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many >> particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very >> ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. > It is extremely ignorant of you to jump to unwarranted conclusions. It's hardly an "unwarranted conclusion" since particle accelerators take into account SR, including time dilation, as part of their design. The fact they work at all shows the design is correct.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-22 20:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8cddefbb-788d-42d9-b143-2bcbf386d365n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618612 |
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 7:18:03 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > On 8/22/2023 2:28 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: > >> On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > >>> Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. > > >> Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many > >> particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very > >> ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. > > It is extremely ignorant of you to jump to unwarranted conclusions. > It's hardly an "unwarranted conclusion" since particle accelerators take > into account SR, including time dilation, as part of their design. The > fact they work at all shows the design is correct. You did not understand. It is an unwarranted inference from n process of change to all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-22 20:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c7ff9b4c-9108-43a6-8572-515efdbe0028n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618612 |
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 7:18:03 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > On 8/22/2023 2:28 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Monday, August 21, 2023 at 5:11:20 PM UTC-7, Tom Roberts wrote: > >> On 8/21/23 6:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > >>> Time dilation is pure ad hoc fiction. > > >> Nonsense! It is observed every day, literally billions of times, at many > >> particle accelerators around the world. It's just that you are so very > >> ignorant of basic physics that you don't know this. > > It is extremely ignorant of you to jump to unwarranted conclusions. > It's hardly an "unwarranted conclusion" since particle accelerators take > into account SR, including time dilation, as part of their design. The > fact they work at all shows the design is correct. You did not understand. It is an unwarranted inference from one process of change to all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 15 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web