Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #617956 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-08-16 17:38 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-08-29 09:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 358 — 36 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 17:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-17 12:05 +1000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 20:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 20:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-17 13:24 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-08-19 06:58 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:19 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 23:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-08-20 07:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 22:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 19:53 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 17:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 18:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 19:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 00:19 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 21:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 15:13 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:43 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 21:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 02:05 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 15:32 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 20:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:57 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:33 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:14 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 15:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-17 17:46 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 20:06 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 09:20 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 15:03 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:44 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-08-17 08:13 -0600
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:59 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:18 -0700
Cranks Richard Hertz and Laurence Crossen run out of arguments "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 09:37 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 20:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:12 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 23:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:44 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-18 12:45 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 04:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 14:32 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:00 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:54 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 16:49 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ben Harin <ianr@ninrbnnr.nn> - 2023-08-18 23:27 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:40 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 19:23 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:18 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:53 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:21 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Wayne Bereznevich <nwne@czewnebe.ze> - 2023-08-18 22:37 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:49 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Elton Vakar <eero@aklenaoo.av> - 2023-08-18 23:07 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Merlan Bauze <emeu@eabezeel.bn> - 2023-08-19 10:13 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-18 15:39 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:56 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 10:22 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 21:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 13:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-18 10:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-18 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 10:22 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:51 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 18:01 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 09:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 18:51 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 10:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 10:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 12:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 16:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:35 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:35 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 08:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 08:26 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:27 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 10:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 19:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 20:30 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 23:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 23:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 10:36 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 08:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 18:03 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 00:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 01:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 11:54 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 03:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 09:38 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 20:05 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 19:52 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 11:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 13:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-23 15:52 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-24 11:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 14:39 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-03 17:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 12:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 22:58 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 21:41 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 11:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 22:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 01:01 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 11:54 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 23:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 23:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 12:01 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 03:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 04:22 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 13:55 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 15:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-24 14:02 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 05:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 13:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Delmer Tupalo <rptm@lmlelodl.el> - 2023-08-20 18:44 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:29 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Travis Bazili <aail@ttttviat.sv> - 2023-08-23 09:38 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:48 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Clarence Talkovsky <nskl@eccaryec.kv> - 2023-08-23 11:53 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:26 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 10:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:32 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 15:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-24 14:02 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-24 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-25 21:45 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-19 11:22 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-20 11:52 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Brett Harkharov <aaah@rthtrath.rk> - 2023-08-19 17:12 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 08:08 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 02:50 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Chico Patsalo <tpac@slsialct.ac> - 2023-08-19 10:41 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:22 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 14:45 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 03:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 08:36 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 19:18 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 17:01 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-20 12:13 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 17:52 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 14:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 09:12 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 00:32 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 15:06 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 06:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:14 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:40 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Shon Babukh <koun@bnbuboab.ob> - 2023-08-18 23:38 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 20:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-18 13:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 15:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 20:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:37 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 12:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 13:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-20 01:55 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 19:19 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 15:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 16:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:20 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 19:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-20 07:07 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:59 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 12:39 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:25 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 20:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:03 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 00:35 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 21:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 10:36 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 22:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 10:03 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:50 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 17:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:34 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 22:42 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 15:30 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:12 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:41 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-21 19:11 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 18:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-21 23:33 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 22:24 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-22 09:58 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:19 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 22:25 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 10:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 11:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-22 14:06 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 22:17 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 23:20 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 21:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 10:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 00:44 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Colby Zolotar <bolr@obzooota.yr> - 2023-08-24 09:32 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 10:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 14:28 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 21:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 06:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:26 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 10:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 22:21 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-23 01:24 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 22:59 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-21 23:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-22 15:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-22 17:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Evenezer Peltser <etpv@pverreet.zz> - 2023-08-23 11:04 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-08-21 21:25 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 00:13 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 18:43 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:51 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:01 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:26 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:31 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 01:00 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Williard Bah <rhab@ihdiadrd.lw> - 2023-08-23 10:30 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:57 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Basil Hariton <athi@iaribinh.bo> - 2023-08-23 11:51 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 07:48 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 20:07 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 18:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 08:51 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 09:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-28 15:20 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-29 06:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-29 09:45 -0700
Page 13 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 18 Next page →
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 13:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fa055ba8-e8f2-4d85-a92e-f7819e5dbeb6n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618303 |
On Saturday, 19 August 2023 at 21:28:16 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 11:30:31 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > > > The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. > > > Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn Einstein... so far... > > > You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you vacuous moron. > I'm pretty confident that I am not the vacuous moron here. You're pretty confident and mistaken.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 16:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4e500dee-a0a0-4162-86f2-e443d54478b0n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618303 |
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 12:28:16 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 11:30:31 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > > > The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. > > > Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn Einstein... so far... > > > You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you vacuous moron. > I'm pretty confident that I am not the vacuous moron here. > > Neither Rutherford nor Tesla overturned Einstein, no matter how much you would like that to be the case. The problem with your opinion is you confuse the recognition of a fact with a fact. They already knew it was nonsense, but you still do not know. They weren't concerned with overturning errors in your brain.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 01:55 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ubrkq5$11qhq$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #618323 |
Le 20/08/2023 à 01:47, Laurence Clark Crossen a écrit : > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 12:28:16 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >> On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 11:30:31 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>>> >>>>> The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. >>>> Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn Einstein... so far... >> >>> You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you vacuous moron. >> I'm pretty confident that I am not the vacuous moron here. >> >> Neither Rutherford nor Tesla overturned Einstein, no matter how much you would like that to be the case. > The problem with your opinion is you confuse the recognition of a fact with a fact. They already knew it was nonsense, but you still do not know. They weren't concerned with overturning errors in your brain. Seriously, you cannot be THAT delusional, Laurence. You are a fake, just trolling, aren't you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 19:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kkd4ftFe1l2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618326 |
On 8/19/2023 6:55 PM, Python wrote: > Le 20/08/2023 à 01:47, Laurence Clark Crossen a écrit : >> On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 12:28:16 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >>> On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 11:30:31 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark >>> Crossen wrote: >>>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark >>>>> Crossen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the >>>>>> worst critics because they can't handle the best. >>>>> Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn >>>>> Einstein... so far... >>> >>>> You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms >>>> you vacuous moron. >>> I'm pretty confident that I am not the vacuous moron here. >>> >>> Neither Rutherford nor Tesla overturned Einstein, no matter how much >>> you would like that to be the case. >> The problem with your opinion is you confuse the recognition of a fact >> with a fact. They already knew it was nonsense, but you still do not >> know. They weren't concerned with overturning errors in your brain. > > Seriously, you cannot be THAT delusional, Laurence. You are a fake, > just trolling, aren't you? No, he's not. The problem with dearth of clarity is that the reader is left to their own devices regarding meaning. I see where he achieves his results and they are not without underpinning. IMO he's wrong but the simple fact is his "sources" were not completely clear. Laurence and I will disagree from now till doomsday what the sources meant and he is as convinced as I am that one interpretation is right the other wrong. We are on opposite sides and matters will remain that way till kingdom come. The one "new thing" I learned over the years having discussions in Usenet is to be certain that what I mean is understood by the correspondents. But truthfully even now I screw up from time to time. A very useful resource is a little book by Strunk & White. Most readers here will never achieve the sorts of clarity that necessitates use of that wonderful little book, but keep it in mind should the occasion arise. Sorry to have to disagree with you Python, but honesty comes ahead of "winning." Clearly you and I agree on the meaning of the underlying citation, but I understand it from Laurence's viewpoint even while I disagree with his take on the topic and the quote.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 15:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d347c551-eed7-493a-977d-a6bdc3f067c8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618326 |
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 4:55:52 PM UTC-7, Python wrote: > Le 20/08/2023 à 01:47, Laurence Clark Crossen a écrit : > > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 12:28:16 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > >> On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 11:30:31 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. > >>>> Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn Einstein... so far... > >> > >>> You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you vacuous moron. > >> I'm pretty confident that I am not the vacuous moron here. > >> > >> Neither Rutherford nor Tesla overturned Einstein, no matter how much you would like that to be the case. > > The problem with your opinion is you confuse the recognition of a fact with a fact. They already knew it was nonsense, but you still do not know. They weren't concerned with overturning errors in your brain. > Seriously, you cannot be THAT delusional, Laurence. You are a fake, > just trolling, aren't you? Very many scientists have known all along that relativity is a pseudoscience, and we can know already for the reasons they did without waiting for a seal of approval from the newspapers or Nobel Committees. The reasons Tesla and Rutherford gave are enough to know. They pointed out it is illogical nonsense. For example, curved space is a pure reification fallacy, so we know just from that it is nonsense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 16:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b724d00a-03d5-48bd-9356-79bb8278b197n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618326 |
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 4:55:52 PM UTC-7, Python wrote: > Le 20/08/2023 à 01:47, Laurence Clark Crossen a écrit : > > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 12:28:16 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > >> On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 11:30:31 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. > >>>> Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn Einstein... so far... > >> > >>> You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you vacuous moron. > >> I'm pretty confident that I am not the vacuous moron here. > >> > >> Neither Rutherford nor Tesla overturned Einstein, no matter how much you would like that to be the case. > > The problem with your opinion is you confuse the recognition of a fact with a fact. They already knew it was nonsense, but you still do not know. They weren't concerned with overturning errors in your brain. > Seriously, you cannot be THAT delusional, Laurence. You are a fake, > just trolling, aren't you? Far more than 1,500 accomplished scientists already know relativity is pseudoscience.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 18:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a664368e-73c9-409d-8872-41d32ef098bdn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618409 |
On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 4:15:43 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 4:55:52 PM UTC-7, Python wrote: > > Le 20/08/2023 à 01:47, Laurence Clark Crossen a écrit : > > > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 12:28:16 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > >> On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 11:30:31 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > >>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > >>>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. > > >>>> Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn Einstein... so far... > > >> > > >>> You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you vacuous moron. > > >> I'm pretty confident that I am not the vacuous moron here. > > >> > > >> Neither Rutherford nor Tesla overturned Einstein, no matter how much you would like that to be the case. > > > The problem with your opinion is you confuse the recognition of a fact with a fact. They already knew it was nonsense, but you still do not know. They weren't concerned with overturning errors in your brain. > > Seriously, you cannot be THAT delusional, Laurence. You are a fake, > > just trolling, aren't you? > Far more than 1,500 accomplished scientists already know relativity is pseudoscience. It is amazing how much science you can believe without a shred of evidence! If you read it on the internet it must be true! "Do not believe everything you read on the internet" - Abraham Lincoln
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 18:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <19dc8a73-6c37-4aa3-af15-e53d7fbc9616n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618414 |
On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 6:09:15 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 4:15:43 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 4:55:52 PM UTC-7, Python wrote: > > > Le 20/08/2023 à 01:47, Laurence Clark Crossen a écrit : > > > > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 12:28:16 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > >> On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 11:30:31 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > >>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > >>>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. > > > >>>> Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn Einstein... so far... > > > >> > > > >>> You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you vacuous moron. > > > >> I'm pretty confident that I am not the vacuous moron here. > > > >> > > > >> Neither Rutherford nor Tesla overturned Einstein, no matter how much you would like that to be the case. > > > > > The problem with your opinion is you confuse the recognition of a fact with a fact. They already knew it was nonsense, but you still do not know. They weren't concerned with overturning errors in your brain. > > > > Seriously, you cannot be THAT delusional, Laurence. You are a fake, > > > just trolling, aren't you? > > > Far more than 1,500 accomplished scientists already know relativity is pseudoscience. > It is amazing how much science you can believe without a shred of evidence! If you read it on the internet it must be true! You have never done anything but quote the internet paul. > > "Do not believe everything you read on the internet" > - Abraham Lincoln
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 19:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4d74baf7-6897-48c5-b591-1d416699f204n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618323 |
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 4:47:32 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 12:28:16 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 11:30:31 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > > > > > The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. > > > > Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn Einstein... so far... > > > > > You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you vacuous moron. > > I'm pretty confident that I am not the vacuous moron here. > > > > Neither Rutherford nor Tesla overturned Einstein, no matter how much you would like that to be the case. > The problem with your opinion is you confuse the recognition of a fact with a fact. They already knew it was nonsense, but you still do not know. They weren't concerned with overturning errors in your brain. It is not my opinion. It is a fact that you do not have a lick of evidence in support of your pathetic claim. If Tesla and/or Rutherford overturned Einstein I would sure like to see the frickin' EVIDENCE... but there is little chance that you can do so! Talk is cheap but evidence rules. Got any?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 22:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <90e18a32-3ff6-409f-8198-4135315f43aan@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618332 |
On Sunday, 20 August 2023 at 04:11:41 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 4:47:32 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 12:28:16 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 11:30:31 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > > > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. > > > > > Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn Einstein... so far... > > > > > > > You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you vacuous moron. > > > I'm pretty confident that I am not the vacuous moron here. > > > > > > Neither Rutherford nor Tesla overturned Einstein, no matter how much you would like that to be the case. > > > The problem with your opinion is you confuse the recognition of a fact with a fact. They already knew it was nonsense, but you still do not know. They weren't concerned with overturning errors in your brain. > It is not my opinion. It is a fact that you do not have a lick of evidence in support of your pathetic claim. If Tesla and/or Rutherford overturned Einstein I would sure like to see the frickin' EVIDENCE... but there is little chance that you can do so! Talk is cheap but evidence rules. Got any? Come on, trash, EVIDENCE can only make you spitting with Polish jokes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <python@invalid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 07:07 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ubs727$182fh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #618338 |
Le 20/08/2023 à 07:02, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > On Sunday, 20 August 2023 at 04:11:41 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: >> On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 4:47:32 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>> On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 12:28:16 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>> On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 11:30:31 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>>>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. >>>>>> Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn Einstein... so far... >>>> >>>>> You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you vacuous moron. >>>> I'm pretty confident that I am not the vacuous moron here. >>>> >>>> Neither Rutherford nor Tesla overturned Einstein, no matter how much you would like that to be the case. >> >>> The problem with your opinion is you confuse the recognition of a fact with a fact. They already knew it was nonsense, but you still do not know. They weren't concerned with overturning errors in your brain. >> It is not my opinion. It is a fact that you do not have a lick of evidence in support of your pathetic claim. If Tesla and/or Rutherford overturned Einstein I would sure like to see the frickin' EVIDENCE... but there is little chance that you can do so! Talk is cheap but evidence rules. Got any? > > Come on, trash, EVIDENCE can only make you spitting > with Polish jokes. such a bad night Maciej? Again? How sad...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 14:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kkcl92FbdejU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618294 |
On 8/19/2023 1:30 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >> >>> The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. >> Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn Einstein... so far... > You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you vacuous moron. Tesla said this about relativity: “[Einstein’s theory of relativity is] a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king… its exponents are brilliant men, but they are meta-physicists rather than scientists.” <https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Nikola-Tesla-reject-general-relativity#:~:text=Tesla%20said%20publicly%3A,people%20take%20for%20a%20king.%E2%80%9D> All bun, no meat. I easily agree with Tesla in this case, but he didn't provide anything definitive either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 16:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c90502d4-4925-43d5-9456-5c6d58f9d177n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618313 |
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 12:59:34 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 8/19/2023 1:30 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > >> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >> > >>> The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. > > >> Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn Einstein... so far... > > > You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you vacuous moron. > Tesla said this about relativity: “[Einstein’s theory of relativity is] > a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes > people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar > clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king… its exponents > are brilliant men, but they are meta-physicists rather than scientists.” > > <https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Nikola-Tesla-reject-general-relativity#:~:text=Tesla%20said%20publicly%3A,people%20take%20for%20a%20king.%E2%80%9D> > > All bun, no meat. I easily agree with Tesla in this case, but he > didn't provide anything definitive either. You are plugging your ears. He said relativity is all bun, no meat. He doesn't need to.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qfqhci.61rlz4101ny5pN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #618313 |
whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > On 8/19/2023 1:30 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02?PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > >> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28?PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen: > >>> > >>> The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst > >>>critics because they can't handle the best. > > >> Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn > >> Einstein... so far... > >> > > You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you > > vacuous moron. > > > Tesla said this about relativity: "[Einstein's theory of relativity is] > a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes > people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar > clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king… its exponents > are brilliant men, but they are meta-physicists rather than scientists." > > <https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Nikola-Tesla-reject-general-relativity#:~:text= Tesla%20said%20publicly%3A,people%20take%20for%20a%20king.%E2%80%9D> > > All bun, no meat. I easily agree with Tesla in this case, but he > didn't provide anything definitive either. Tesla said this in 1935. He was already a recognised crackpot by then, and perhaps also dementing. (at age 79) He was no longer taken seriously by anybody 'in the know' because his later 'inventions', like 'free energy' and 'atmospheric electricity' were obviously nonsensical. He kept going because George Westinghouse had stipulated in his will that General Electric must take care of Tesla. (by formally keeping him on as 'advisor') They paid his hotel bills and managed his finances for him. Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 12:39 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qfregr.hdo9fk7nazumN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #618294 |
Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:22:02?PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:37:28?PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen: > > > > > The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst > > > critics because they can't handle the best. > > Even the best of the best critics have no evidence to overturn > > Einstein... so far... > You haven't even contended with Rutherford's and Tesla's criticisms you > vacuous moron. Still awaiting your source for Rutherford overturning relativity. Do you have one, or are you merely repeating your bluff? Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 19:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <97309717-e8d4-48e0-8a1e-913267fd5915n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618197 |
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 8:37:28 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. Tesla, the great: "I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties". Poor Nikola, arguing with godless satanic people. He knew them well. He came from where the first relativists nested, preparing the ground to break western civilization, wit Bolshevism, Freud, Rothschild. He knew very well them and their reptilian patrons. He came to USA, changed the fate of the world single-handedly, just to be cancelled by the same jewish cabal. The christian Westinghouse and his heirs in the company provided a decent living for him during the next 35 years, after he was chewed up and outcasted/cancelled.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 19:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e74bf380-7315-47a6-92d5-86fef7817bb9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618214 |
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 7:26:01 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 8:37:28 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. > Tesla, the great: "I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties". And yet, so far, there is zero evidence to support Tesla's claim that space cannot be curved... unless you can provide it... and good luck with that!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 20:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <06af1103-51f3-4477-9dae-ae194f17ed24n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618216 |
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:55:28 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 7:26:01 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 8:37:28 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. > > Tesla, the great: "I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties". > And yet, so far, there is zero evidence to support Tesla's claim that space cannot be curved... unless you can provide it... and good luck with that! Provide EVIDENCE that space can be CURVED or shut the fuck up, cynic charlatan! And don't dare to come with formulae. You can shove them deep into your ass. Provide EXACT EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE about this fantastic and centenary fairy tale, which you worship like a gullible imbecile.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 21:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9a8c8bfb-40f0-413c-819a-8699cccc4238n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618218 |
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 8:57:00 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:55:28 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 7:26:01 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 8:37:28 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > > > The relativists here continue as bottom feeders attacking the worst critics because they can't handle the best. > > > Tesla, the great: "I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties". > > And yet, so far, there is zero evidence to support Tesla's claim that space cannot be curved... unless you can provide it... and good luck with that! > Provide EVIDENCE that space can be CURVED or shut the fuck up, cynic charlatan! > > And don't dare to come with formulae. You can shove them deep into your ass. > > Provide EXACT EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE about this fantastic and centenary fairy tale, which you worship like a gullible imbecile. I asked you for evidence first, so go stuff it where the sun don't shine. The mainstream physics, as claimed in textbooks and research papers worldwide, says that space is curved. It is NOT my theory and I am no expert. If you think that mainstream physics is incorrect, then all you need to do is provide evidence to support your position, at which time you will receive a Noble Prize. Pretty simple, eh? Here, I will start you off... https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_42.html#:~:text=If%20we%20lay%20out%20a,more%20complicated%20than%20in%20two. ... all you need to do now is show me where Feynman has made a mistake... and once again, good luck with that! You don't know what you don't know and that is not likely to change anytime soon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 22:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ce2e7bc9-c695-4840-bddc-4a77065a5d2en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618220 |
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 1:09:50 AM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 8:57:00 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: <snip> > > > And yet, so far, there is zero evidence to support Tesla's claim that space cannot be curved... unless you can provide it... and good luck with that! > > > Provide EVIDENCE that space can be CURVED or shut the fuck up, cynic charlatan! > > And don't dare to come with formulae. You can shove them deep into your ass. > > Provide EXACT EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE about this fantastic and centenary fairy tale, which you worship like a gullible imbecile. > I asked you for evidence first, so go stuff it where the sun don't shine. > > The mainstream physics, as claimed in textbooks and research papers worldwide, says that space is curved. It is NOT my theory and I am no expert. If you think that mainstream physics is incorrect, then all you need to do is provide evidence to support your position, at which time you will receive a Noble Prize. > > Pretty simple, eh? Of course that's pretty simple: you are a RETARDED PARROT that follows the herd, without knowing where it's going, what is the purpose and how the cattle is so submissive. Just obey and repeat. You have NO LINKS TO EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE ABOUT SPACE BEING TWISTED AND CURVED BY MASSIVE CELESTIAL BODIES. You DON'T EVEN UNDERSTAND WHAT THE FUCK A "CURVED SPACE" MEANS and yet you're a supporter of the existence of gravitational waves, black holes, gravitational redshift and time dilation. This, you being NOBODY, paint you as A COMPLETE IMBECILE. What the fuck are you doing here? Just defending Einstein because he was a Jew? Is that? And your main display of intelligence is to repeat, like a fucking retarded: "You don't know what you don't know", asshole. If you don't know shit about this matter, then you move based ON FAITH. And FAITH is the motor of any RELIGION. So, you are a religious worshiper of something that you're not qualified to understand but that you support because is MANDATORY in your pagan religion based on pseudo-science, pseudo-philosophy, sophism, LIES and DECEPTIONS. The above describe you as the PERFECT IDIOT that this infamous religion of relativity needs, to continue the spread by indoctrination. So, what do you bring to the table: Books, papers, wording of popular self-hyped science MSM anchors, myths, fallacies, paradoxes, insane proposals like the inflation of the universe one trillion times in 0,000000000000000000000000000000001 seconds, etc. Fucking retarded, a disgrace of a human species.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 13 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 … 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web