Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #617956 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-08-16 17:38 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-08-29 09:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 358 — 36 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 17:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-17 12:05 +1000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 20:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 20:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-17 13:24 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-08-19 06:58 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:19 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 23:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-08-20 07:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 22:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 19:53 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 17:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 18:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 19:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 00:19 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 21:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 15:13 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:43 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 21:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 02:05 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 15:32 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 20:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:57 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:33 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:14 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 15:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-17 17:46 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 20:06 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 09:20 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 15:03 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:44 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-08-17 08:13 -0600
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:59 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:18 -0700
Cranks Richard Hertz and Laurence Crossen run out of arguments "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 09:37 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 20:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:12 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 23:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:44 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-18 12:45 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 04:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 14:32 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:00 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:54 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 16:49 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ben Harin <ianr@ninrbnnr.nn> - 2023-08-18 23:27 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:40 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 19:23 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:18 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:53 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:21 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Wayne Bereznevich <nwne@czewnebe.ze> - 2023-08-18 22:37 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:49 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Elton Vakar <eero@aklenaoo.av> - 2023-08-18 23:07 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Merlan Bauze <emeu@eabezeel.bn> - 2023-08-19 10:13 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-18 15:39 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:56 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 10:22 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 21:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 13:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-18 10:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-18 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 10:22 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:51 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 18:01 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 09:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 18:51 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 10:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 10:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 12:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 16:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:35 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:35 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 08:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 08:26 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:27 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 10:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 19:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 20:30 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 23:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 23:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 10:36 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 08:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 18:03 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 00:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 01:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 11:54 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 03:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 09:38 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 20:05 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 19:52 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 11:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 13:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-23 15:52 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-24 11:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 14:39 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-03 17:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 12:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 22:58 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 21:41 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 11:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 22:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 01:01 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 11:54 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 23:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 23:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 12:01 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 03:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 04:22 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 13:55 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 15:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-24 14:02 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 05:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 13:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Delmer Tupalo <rptm@lmlelodl.el> - 2023-08-20 18:44 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:29 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Travis Bazili <aail@ttttviat.sv> - 2023-08-23 09:38 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:48 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Clarence Talkovsky <nskl@eccaryec.kv> - 2023-08-23 11:53 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:26 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 10:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:32 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 15:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-24 14:02 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-24 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-25 21:45 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-19 11:22 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-20 11:52 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Brett Harkharov <aaah@rthtrath.rk> - 2023-08-19 17:12 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 08:08 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 02:50 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Chico Patsalo <tpac@slsialct.ac> - 2023-08-19 10:41 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:22 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 14:45 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 03:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 08:36 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 19:18 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 17:01 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-20 12:13 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 17:52 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 14:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 09:12 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 00:32 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 15:06 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 06:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:14 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:40 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Shon Babukh <koun@bnbuboab.ob> - 2023-08-18 23:38 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 20:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-18 13:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 15:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 20:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:37 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 12:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 13:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-20 01:55 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 19:19 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 15:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 16:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:20 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 19:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-20 07:07 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:59 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 12:39 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:25 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 20:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:03 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 00:35 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 21:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 10:36 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 22:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 10:03 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:50 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 17:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:34 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 22:42 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 15:30 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:12 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:41 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-21 19:11 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 18:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-21 23:33 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 22:24 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-22 09:58 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:19 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 22:25 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 10:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 11:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-22 14:06 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 22:17 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 23:20 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 21:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 10:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 00:44 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Colby Zolotar <bolr@obzooota.yr> - 2023-08-24 09:32 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 10:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 14:28 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 21:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 06:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:26 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 10:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 22:21 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-23 01:24 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 22:59 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-21 23:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-22 15:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-22 17:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Evenezer Peltser <etpv@pverreet.zz> - 2023-08-23 11:04 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-08-21 21:25 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 00:13 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 18:43 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:51 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:01 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:26 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:31 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 01:00 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Williard Bah <rhab@ihdiadrd.lw> - 2023-08-23 10:30 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:57 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Basil Hariton <athi@iaribinh.bo> - 2023-08-23 11:51 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 07:48 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 20:07 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 18:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 08:51 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 09:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-28 15:20 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-29 06:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-29 09:45 -0700
Page 4 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 18 Next page →
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qfmo11.xngp8lxt3qb0N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #618033 |
Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:15:13?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > List of Critics of Relativity: > > [list] > > Einstein's reaction on learning about the book: > > "Hundert Autoren Gegen Einstein" (1931) > > is still to the point: > > "Wenn sie recht hätten, würde einer genügen." > > (English) > > "One would have sufficed, if they had been right", > > > > Jan > Here's an English translation so you can give me chapter and verse: > HUNDRED AUTHORS AGAINST EINSTEIN -ROUGH TRANSLATION Roger J Anderton > R.J.Anderton@btinternet Wrong way round: you started it, you should point out someone in it who made a valuable contribution. BTW, you are again making it obvious that you are praising a book that you have not even glanced at. If you had, you would have known that they never succeeded in getting anywhere near that 100 authors that the title promisses. Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-17 13:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d279ee13-bed8-410e-b407-6a19a4444963n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618039 |
On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 1:40:14 PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:15:13?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > List of Critics of Relativity: > > > [list] > > > Einstein's reaction on learning about the book: > > > "Hundert Autoren Gegen Einstein" (1931) > > > is still to the point: > > > "Wenn sie recht hätten, würde einer genügen." > > > (English) > > > "One would have sufficed, if they had been right", > > > > > > Jan > > Here's an English translation so you can give me chapter and verse: > > HUNDRED AUTHORS AGAINST EINSTEIN -ROUGH TRANSLATION Roger J Anderton > > R.J.Anderton@btinternet > Wrong way round: you started it, > you should point out someone in it who made a valuable contribution. > > BTW, you are again making it obvious > that you are praising a book that you have not even glanced at. > > If you had, you would have known > that they never succeeded in getting anywhere near > that 100 authors that the title promisses. > > Jan Aren't you as silly as can be, demanding they have more authors for you to take them seriously.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-17 23:13 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qfmqgn.j2zz4qv9sqpnN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #618042 |
Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 1:40:14?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:15:13?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > List of Critics of Relativity: > > > > [list] > > > > Einstein's reaction on learning about the book: > > > > "Hundert Autoren Gegen Einstein" (1931) > > > > is still to the point: > > > > "Wenn sie recht hätten, würde einer genügen." > > > > (English) > > > > "One would have sufficed, if they had been right", > > > > > > > > Jan > > > Here's an English translation so you can give me chapter and verse: > > > HUNDRED AUTHORS AGAINST EINSTEIN -ROUGH TRANSLATION Roger J Anderton > > > R.J.Anderton@btinternet > > Wrong way round: you started it, > > you should point out someone in it who made a valuable contribution. > > > > BTW, you are again making it obvious > > that you are praising a book that you have not even glanced at. > > > > If you had, you would have known > > that they never succeeded in getting anywhere near > > that 100 authors that the title promisses. > > > > Jan > Aren't you as silly as can be, demanding they have more authors for you to > take them seriously. See, you know nothing about it. In 1920 a proto-nazi I won't mention organised anti-Einstein rallies in Berlin, filling even a stadium with it. (a whole shouting stadium, if that isn't convincing, what is) He then decided to publish an anti-Einstein book, out of what he had. Originally, in the original enthousiasm more than a hundred people promised a contribution. They had been assuming that it would become a publication to be taken seriously. When they realised what kind of crap it was going to be most of the hundred+ declined to contribute after all. If you have a good name, why waste it? So finally after ten years of begging, needling, pushing and so on they decided to make do with the crap they had. (1931) (38 authors, iirc) So there really wasn't anything for Einstein to answer, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-17 14:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f6632946-37cf-4992-a812-9813cf2ac68bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618047 |
On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 2:13:50 PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 1:40:14?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:15:13?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > List of Critics of Relativity: > > > > > [list] > > > > > Einstein's reaction on learning about the book: > > > > > "Hundert Autoren Gegen Einstein" (1931) > > > > > is still to the point: > > > > > "Wenn sie recht hätten, würde einer genügen." > > > > > (English) > > > > > "One would have sufficed, if they had been right", > > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > Here's an English translation so you can give me chapter and verse: > > > > HUNDRED AUTHORS AGAINST EINSTEIN -ROUGH TRANSLATION Roger J Anderton > > > > R.J.Anderton@btinternet > > > Wrong way round: you started it, > > > you should point out someone in it who made a valuable contribution. > > > > > > BTW, you are again making it obvious > > > that you are praising a book that you have not even glanced at. > > > > > > If you had, you would have known > > > that they never succeeded in getting anywhere near > > > that 100 authors that the title promisses. > > > > > > Jan > > Aren't you as silly as can be, demanding they have more authors for you to > > take them seriously. > See, you know nothing about it. > In 1920 a proto-nazi I won't mention > organised anti-Einstein rallies in Berlin, > filling even a stadium with it. > (a whole shouting stadium, if that isn't convincing, what is) > He then decided to publish an anti-Einstein book, out of what he had. > Originally, in the original enthousiasm > more than a hundred people promised a contribution. > > They had been assuming that it would become a publication > to be taken seriously. > When they realised what kind of crap it was going to be > most of the hundred+ declined to contribute after all. > If you have a good name, why waste it? > > So finally after ten years of begging, needling, pushing and so on > they decided to make do with the crap they had. (1931) > (38 authors, iirc) > > So there really wasn't anything for Einstein to answer, > > Jan As usual, all you have is an ad hominem begging of the question and a refusal to answer the criticisms.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 12:45 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qfnm1r.ty4r16jbmy7yN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #618052 |
Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 2:13:50?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 1:40:14?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:15:13?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > List of Critics of Relativity: > > > > > > [list] > > > > > > Einstein's reaction on learning about the book: > > > > > > "Hundert Autoren Gegen Einstein" (1931) > > > > > > is still to the point: > > > > > > "Wenn sie recht hätten, würde einer genügen." > > > > > > (English) > > > > > > "One would have sufficed, if they had been right", > > > > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > Here's an English translation so you can give me chapter and verse: > > > > > HUNDRED AUTHORS AGAINST EINSTEIN -ROUGH TRANSLATION Roger J Anderton > > > > > R.J.Anderton@btinternet > > > > Wrong way round: you started it, > > > > you should point out someone in it who made a valuable contribution. > > > > > > > > BTW, you are again making it obvious > > > > that you are praising a book that you have not even glanced at. > > > > > > > > If you had, you would have known > > > > that they never succeeded in getting anywhere near > > > > that 100 authors that the title promisses. > > > > > > > > Jan > > > Aren't you as silly as can be, demanding they have more authors for you to > > > take them seriously. > > See, you know nothing about it. > > In 1920 a proto-nazi I won't mention > > organised anti-Einstein rallies in Berlin, > > filling even a stadium with it. > > (a whole shouting stadium, if that isn't convincing, what is) > > He then decided to publish an anti-Einstein book, out of what he had. > > Originally, in the original enthousiasm > > more than a hundred people promised a contribution. > > > > They had been assuming that it would become a publication > > to be taken seriously. > > When they realised what kind of crap it was going to be > > most of the hundred+ declined to contribute after all. > > If you have a good name, why waste it? > > > > So finally after ten years of begging, needling, pushing and so on > > they decided to make do with the crap they had. (1931) > > (38 authors, iirc) > > > > So there really wasn't anything for Einstein to answer, > > > > Jan > As usual, all you have is an ad hominem begging of the question and a > refusal to answer the criticisms. > Don't so lazy. The full original text is on-line at <https://archive.org/stream/HundertAutorenGegenEinstein/Hundert%20Autoren%20gegen%20Einstein%20%281931%29_djvu.txt> English translation already mentioned at <https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Communications-Relativity%20Theory/Download/8680> Extract some (according to you) still relevant and meaningful criticism of relativity, and we can discuss that, Jan [correction: it was 28 authors, not 38, as I incorrectly remembered]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 04:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a8c7cd56-719c-40dc-97e5-68f993ee75a7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618120 |
On Friday, 18 August 2023 at 12:45:15 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 2:13:50?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 1:40:14?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:15:13?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > List of Critics of Relativity: > > > > > > > [list] > > > > > > > Einstein's reaction on learning about the book: > > > > > > > "Hundert Autoren Gegen Einstein" (1931) > > > > > > > is still to the point: > > > > > > > "Wenn sie recht hätten, würde einer genügen." > > > > > > > (English) > > > > > > > "One would have sufficed, if they had been right", > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > Here's an English translation so you can give me chapter and verse: > > > > > > HUNDRED AUTHORS AGAINST EINSTEIN -ROUGH TRANSLATION Roger J Anderton > > > > > > R.J.Anderton@btinternet > > > > > Wrong way round: you started it, > > > > > you should point out someone in it who made a valuable contribution. > > > > > > > > > > BTW, you are again making it obvious > > > > > that you are praising a book that you have not even glanced at. > > > > > > > > > > If you had, you would have known > > > > > that they never succeeded in getting anywhere near > > > > > that 100 authors that the title promisses. > > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > Aren't you as silly as can be, demanding they have more authors for you to > > > > take them seriously. > > > See, you know nothing about it. > > > In 1920 a proto-nazi I won't mention > > > organised anti-Einstein rallies in Berlin, > > > filling even a stadium with it. > > > (a whole shouting stadium, if that isn't convincing, what is) > > > He then decided to publish an anti-Einstein book, out of what he had. > > > Originally, in the original enthousiasm > > > more than a hundred people promised a contribution. > > > > > > They had been assuming that it would become a publication > > > to be taken seriously. > > > When they realised what kind of crap it was going to be > > > most of the hundred+ declined to contribute after all. > > > If you have a good name, why waste it? > > > > > > So finally after ten years of begging, needling, pushing and so on > > > they decided to make do with the crap they had. (1931) > > > (38 authors, iirc) > > > > > > So there really wasn't anything for Einstein to answer, > > > > > > Jan > > As usual, all you have is an ad hominem begging of the question and a > > refusal to answer the criticisms. > > > Don't so lazy. The full original text is on-line at > <https://archive.org/stream/HundertAutorenGegenEinstein/Hundert%20Autoren%20gegen%20Einstein%20%281931%29_djvu.txt> > English translation already mentioned at > <https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Communications-Relativity%20Theory/Download/8680> > > Extract some (according to you) still relevant and meaningful criticism > of relativity, and we can discuss that, "Unfortunately, physicists who believe in Einstein’s relativity have mostly ignored looking at what critics say" Well, as expected from a bunch of fanatic idiots.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 14:32 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kk96nfFpkubU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618120 |
On 2023-08-18 10:45:12 +0000, J. J. Lodder said: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 2:13:50?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 1:40:14?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:15:13?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>>>>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> List of Critics of Relativity: >>>>>>> [list] >>>>>>> Einstein's reaction on learning about the book: >>>>>>> "Hundert Autoren Gegen Einstein" (1931) >>>>>>> is still to the point: >>>>>>> "Wenn sie recht hätten, würde einer genügen." >>>>>>> (English) >>>>>>> "One would have sufficed, if they had been right", >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jan >>>>>> Here's an English translation so you can give me chapter and verse: >>>>>> HUNDRED AUTHORS AGAINST EINSTEIN -ROUGH TRANSLATION Roger J Anderton >>>>>> R.J.Anderton@btinternet >>>>> Wrong way round: you started it, >>>>> you should point out someone in it who made a valuable contribution. >>>>> >>>>> BTW, you are again making it obvious >>>>> that you are praising a book that you have not even glanced at. >>>>> >>>>> If you had, you would have known >>>>> that they never succeeded in getting anywhere near >>>>> that 100 authors that the title promisses. >>>>> >>>>> Jan >>>> Aren't you as silly as can be, demanding they have more authors for you to >>>> take them seriously. >>> See, you know nothing about it. >>> In 1920 a proto-nazi I won't mention >>> organised anti-Einstein rallies in Berlin, >>> filling even a stadium with it. >>> (a whole shouting stadium, if that isn't convincing, what is) >>> He then decided to publish an anti-Einstein book, out of what he had. >>> Originally, in the original enthousiasm >>> more than a hundred people promised a contribution. >>> >>> They had been assuming that it would become a publication >>> to be taken seriously. >>> When they realised what kind of crap it was going to be >>> most of the hundred+ declined to contribute after all. >>> If you have a good name, why waste it? >>> >>> So finally after ten years of begging, needling, pushing and so on >>> they decided to make do with the crap they had. (1931) >>> (38 authors, iirc) >>> >>> So there really wasn't anything for Einstein to answer, >>> >>> Jan >> As usual, all you have is an ad hominem begging of the question and a >> refusal to answer the criticisms. >> > Don't so lazy. The full original text is on-line at > <https://archive.org/stream/HundertAutorenGegenEinstein/Hundert%20Autoren%20gegen%20Einstein%20%281931%29_djvu.txt> > > English translation already mentioned at > <https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Communications-Relativity%20Theory/Download/8680> > > > Extract some (according to you) still relevant and meaningful criticism > of relativity, and we can discuss that, I found this too boring to read more than a few passages. However, there are some that seem to be pre-echoes of some of the comments made here, such as > In his Special Theory, Einstein asserts that the speed of light is the > same in all directions in space, regardless of the speed of the light > source and that of the observer. However, in his General Theory, he > rejects this alleged law and boldly claims that it does not hold in a > gravitational field like that of the sun. Laws that contradict one > another are the core and essence of Einstein's ridiculous structure. > (p. 43) Quote-mining crackpots may find it useful to read it from beginning to end in search of similar examples. Dr Hans Israel was the leading editor of the book, and a contributor to it. It doesn't strike me as an obviously Aryan name. > > [correction: it was 28 authors, not 38, as I incorrectly remembered] -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 11:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cb98b443-9483-4f01-b66c-bc5673a45a04n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618126 |
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 5:32:52 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-08-18 10:45:12 +0000, J. J. Lodder said: > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 2:13:50?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 1:40:14?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >>>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:15:13?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >>>>>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> List of Critics of Relativity: > >>>>>>> [list] > >>>>>>> Einstein's reaction on learning about the book: > >>>>>>> "Hundert Autoren Gegen Einstein" (1931) > >>>>>>> is still to the point: > >>>>>>> "Wenn sie recht hätten, würde einer genügen." > >>>>>>> (English) > >>>>>>> "One would have sufficed, if they had been right", > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jan > >>>>>> Here's an English translation so you can give me chapter and verse: > >>>>>> HUNDRED AUTHORS AGAINST EINSTEIN -ROUGH TRANSLATION Roger J Anderton > >>>>>> R.J.Anderton@btinternet > >>>>> Wrong way round: you started it, > >>>>> you should point out someone in it who made a valuable contribution. > >>>>> > >>>>> BTW, you are again making it obvious > >>>>> that you are praising a book that you have not even glanced at. > >>>>> > >>>>> If you had, you would have known > >>>>> that they never succeeded in getting anywhere near > >>>>> that 100 authors that the title promisses. > >>>>> > >>>>> Jan > >>>> Aren't you as silly as can be, demanding they have more authors for you to > >>>> take them seriously. > >>> See, you know nothing about it. > >>> In 1920 a proto-nazi I won't mention > >>> organised anti-Einstein rallies in Berlin, > >>> filling even a stadium with it. > >>> (a whole shouting stadium, if that isn't convincing, what is) > >>> He then decided to publish an anti-Einstein book, out of what he had. > >>> Originally, in the original enthousiasm > >>> more than a hundred people promised a contribution. > >>> > >>> They had been assuming that it would become a publication > >>> to be taken seriously. > >>> When they realised what kind of crap it was going to be > >>> most of the hundred+ declined to contribute after all. > >>> If you have a good name, why waste it? > >>> > >>> So finally after ten years of begging, needling, pushing and so on > >>> they decided to make do with the crap they had. (1931) > >>> (38 authors, iirc) > >>> > >>> So there really wasn't anything for Einstein to answer, > >>> > >>> Jan > >> As usual, all you have is an ad hominem begging of the question and a > >> refusal to answer the criticisms. > >> > > Don't so lazy. The full original text is on-line at > > <https://archive.org/stream/HundertAutorenGegenEinstein/Hundert%20Autoren%20gegen%20Einstein%20%281931%29_djvu.txt> > > > > English translation already mentioned at > > <https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Communications-Relativity%20Theory/Download/8680> > > > > > > Extract some (according to you) still relevant and meaningful criticism > > of relativity, and we can discuss that, > I found this too boring to read more than a few passages. However, > there are some that seem to be pre-echoes of some of the comments made > here, such as > > > In his Special Theory, Einstein asserts that the speed of light is the > > same in all directions in space, regardless of the speed of the light > > source and that of the observer. However, in his General Theory, he > > rejects this alleged law and boldly claims that it does not hold in a > > gravitational field like that of the sun. Laws that contradict one > > another are the core and essence of Einstein's ridiculous structure. > > (p. 43) > > Quote-mining crackpots may find it useful to read it from beginning to > end in search of similar examples. > > Dr Hans Israel was the leading editor of the book, and a contributor to > it. It doesn't strike me as an obviously Aryan name. > > > > [correction: it was 28 authors, not 38, as I incorrectly remembered] > -- > athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots Relativists yawn instead of reasoning.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 11:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <560e903e-7562-44b8-8a58-4d21af687f3fn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618148 |
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:16:46 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > Relativists yawn instead of reasoning. There is no such term as "relativist" as applied to physicists. That is just a made-up term by cranks and crackpots.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 21:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kk9tdgFt4o1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618150 |
On 2023-08-18 18:19:52 +0000, Paul Alsing said: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:16:46 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >> Relativists yawn instead of reasoning. > > There is no such term as "relativist" as applied to physicists. Still less to biochemists. > That is just a made-up term by cranks and crackpots. Right. I've never claimed to be physicist or an expert on the theory of relativity. Nonetheless, I know more about both than most of the crackpots here. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 14:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kka0k7FtipsU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618150 |
On 8/18/2023 1:19 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:16:46 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >> Relativists yawn instead of reasoning. > > There is no such term as "relativist" as applied to physicists. That is just a made-up term by cranks and crackpots. Create what appears to be a weak link, and then attack that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 13:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2ced5935-f31b-4509-994c-5af4320452een@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618161 |
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 12:54:50 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 8/18/2023 1:19 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:16:46 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > >> Relativists yawn instead of reasoning. > > > > There is no such term as "relativist" as applied to physicists. That is just a made-up term by cranks and crackpots. > Create what appears to be a weak link, and then attack that. You're so stupid you claim its all linked or interdependent. The straw man again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 16:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kka7bdFtipsU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618174 |
On 8/18/2023 3:48 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 12:54:50 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> On 8/18/2023 1:19 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: >>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:16:46 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>>> Relativists yawn instead of reasoning. >>> There is no such term as "relativist" as applied to physicists. That is just a made-up term by cranks and crackpots. >> Create what appears to be a weak link, and then attack that. > You're so stupid you claim its all linked or interdependent. The straw man again. Thanks for showing your soft inept underbelly. This presents the correct view that you don't actually know what is linked and interdependent. Of course you don't. Someone told you those are weak points in physics. They are not, they are what keeps physics relevant. Why do you selectively target only the things that aren't easy to understand? Does force generally diminish with the square of the distance or not? Stupid is as stupid writes. Look in a mirror. step back two feet and look again. You'd have to be completely inept to fail to see what is going on. But then you probably don't. A linear universe simply doesn't exist. I could go on, but I feel certain what I wrote here is already more than you can fathom. Do let me know when you *actually* understand this posting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 16:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4afd07e4-9950-4f78-8c82-a57efb5e2139n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618180 |
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 6:49:37 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote: <snip> > A linear universe simply doesn't exist. I could go on, but I > feel certain what I wrote here is already more than you can > fathom. Senile imbecile, who are you to make such affirmation? God? Your rate and quality of postings show, day after day, that your mental decline is worsening at warp speed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ben Harin <ianr@ninrbnnr.nn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 23:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <uboup8$ea7n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #618194 |
Richard Hertz wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 6:49:37 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote: > > <snip> > >> A linear universe simply doesn't exist. I could go on, but I feel >> certain what I wrote here is already more than you can fathom. > > Senile imbecile, who are you to make such affirmation? God? > Your rate and quality of postings show, day after day, that your mental > decline is worsening at warp speed. i suspect he's fart intoxicated. You can't think straight the place you do the work. The fart you leak are in your thoughts. Unavoidable. The bidona 𝗶𝘀_𝗳𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗶𝗻_𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰_𝘁𝗼𝗼. I seen 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻_𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿_𝗻𝗼𝘀𝗲_𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆 from bidona of america. I think he smells worse than Smellensky. Even Smellensky turned his nose away from the bidona of america.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 15:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ubr9cr$a0kp$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #618196 |
On 8/18/2023 6:27 PM, Ben Harin wrote: > Richard Hertz wrote: > >> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 6:49:37 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>> A linear universe simply doesn't exist. I could go on, but I feel >>> certain what I wrote here is already more than you can fathom. >> >> Senile imbecile, who are you to make such affirmation? God? >> Your rate and quality of postings show, day after day, that your mental >> decline is worsening at warp speed. > > i suspect he's fart intoxicated. Hahahahhah :-) That SOB is still here then. It could be fentanyl! At his age it would not matter much. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 19:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kkd4ohFe1l2U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618316 |
On 8/19/2023 3:40 PM, Physfitfreak wrote: > On 8/18/2023 6:27 PM, Ben Harin wrote: >> Richard Hertz wrote: >> >>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 6:49:37 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>>> A linear universe simply doesn't exist. I could go on, but I feel >>>> certain what I wrote here is already more than you can fathom. >>> >>> Senile imbecile, who are you to make such affirmation? God? >>> Your rate and quality of postings show, day after day, that your mental >>> decline is worsening at warp speed. >> >> i suspect he's fart intoxicated. > > > > Hahahahhah :-) > > That SOB is still here then. It could be fentanyl! At his age it would > not matter much. Nastiness has its own price. I hope you're prepared to pay it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 16:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6b510e1c-5bff-46e1-b0f9-ad637b26b4ccn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618194 |
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 4:18:16 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 6:49:37 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote: > > <snip> > > A linear universe simply doesn't exist. I could go on, but I > > feel certain what I wrote here is already more than you can > > fathom. > Senile imbecile, who are you to make such affirmation? God? > > Your rate and quality of postings show, day after day, that your mental decline is worsening at warp speed. You are projecting again, Dick...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 18:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <uboqnv$dnvd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #618161 |
On 8/18/2023 3:54 PM, whodat wrote: > On 8/18/2023 1:19 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: >> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:16:46 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark >> Crossen wrote: >> >>> Relativists yawn instead of reasoning. >> >> There is no such term as "relativist" as applied to physicists. That >> is just a made-up term by cranks and crackpots. > > Create what appears to be a weak link, and then attack that. > More like create a word and use it as an insult or slur and attack the person described by the insulting word. A longtime favorite method of bullying types.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 11:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f26e1e44-d882-40e7-ae50-2a577567af01n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618120 |
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 3:45:15 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 2:13:50?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 1:40:14?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:15:13?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > List of Critics of Relativity: > > > > > > > [list] > > > > > > > Einstein's reaction on learning about the book: > > > > > > > "Hundert Autoren Gegen Einstein" (1931) > > > > > > > is still to the point: > > > > > > > "Wenn sie recht hätten, würde einer genügen." > > > > > > > (English) > > > > > > > "One would have sufficed, if they had been right", > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > Here's an English translation so you can give me chapter and verse: > > > > > > HUNDRED AUTHORS AGAINST EINSTEIN -ROUGH TRANSLATION Roger J Anderton > > > > > > R.J.Anderton@btinternet > > > > > Wrong way round: you started it, > > > > > you should point out someone in it who made a valuable contribution. > > > > > > > > > > BTW, you are again making it obvious > > > > > that you are praising a book that you have not even glanced at. > > > > > > > > > > If you had, you would have known > > > > > that they never succeeded in getting anywhere near > > > > > that 100 authors that the title promisses. > > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > Aren't you as silly as can be, demanding they have more authors for you to > > > > take them seriously. > > > See, you know nothing about it. > > > In 1920 a proto-nazi I won't mention > > > organised anti-Einstein rallies in Berlin, > > > filling even a stadium with it. > > > (a whole shouting stadium, if that isn't convincing, what is) > > > He then decided to publish an anti-Einstein book, out of what he had. > > > Originally, in the original enthousiasm > > > more than a hundred people promised a contribution. > > > > > > They had been assuming that it would become a publication > > > to be taken seriously. > > > When they realised what kind of crap it was going to be > > > most of the hundred+ declined to contribute after all. > > > If you have a good name, why waste it? > > > > > > So finally after ten years of begging, needling, pushing and so on > > > they decided to make do with the crap they had. (1931) > > > (38 authors, iirc) > > > > > > So there really wasn't anything for Einstein to answer, > > > > > > Jan > > As usual, all you have is an ad hominem begging of the question and a > > refusal to answer the criticisms. > > > Don't so lazy. The full original text is on-line at > <https://archive.org/stream/HundertAutorenGegenEinstein/Hundert%20Autoren%20gegen%20Einstein%20%281931%29_djvu.txt> > English translation already mentioned at > <https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Communications-Relativity%20Theory/Download/8680> > > Extract some (according to you) still relevant and meaningful criticism > of relativity, and we can discuss that, > > Jan > > [correction: it was 28 authors, not 38, as I incorrectly remembered] What kind of predator attacks the weak? Why wouldn't you start with the strongest critics if relativity can be defended at all?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web