Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #617956 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-08-16 17:38 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-08-29 09:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 358 — 36 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 17:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-17 12:05 +1000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 20:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 20:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-17 13:24 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-08-19 06:58 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:19 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 23:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-08-20 07:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 22:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 19:53 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 17:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 18:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 19:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 00:19 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 21:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 15:13 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:43 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 21:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 02:05 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 23:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 15:32 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 20:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 20:57 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:33 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:14 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 15:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-17 17:46 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 16:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 20:06 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 09:20 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 15:03 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:44 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@comcast.net> - 2023-08-17 08:13 -0600
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:59 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:18 -0700
Cranks Richard Hertz and Laurence Crossen run out of arguments "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 09:37 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 20:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:12 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 13:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 23:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:44 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-18 12:45 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 04:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 14:32 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:00 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:54 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 16:49 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ben Harin <ianr@ninrbnnr.nn> - 2023-08-18 23:27 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:40 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 19:23 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:18 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:53 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:21 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Wayne Bereznevich <nwne@czewnebe.ze> - 2023-08-18 22:37 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:49 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Elton Vakar <eero@aklenaoo.av> - 2023-08-18 23:07 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Merlan Bauze <emeu@eabezeel.bn> - 2023-08-19 10:13 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-18 15:39 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 14:56 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 10:22 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 21:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 13:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-18 10:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-18 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 10:22 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:51 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 18:01 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 09:16 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 18:51 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 10:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 10:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 12:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 16:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:57 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:35 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:35 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 08:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 08:26 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:27 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 10:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 19:49 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 20:30 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 23:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 23:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 10:36 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:29 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 08:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 18:03 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 10:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 00:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 01:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 11:54 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 03:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 09:38 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 20:05 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 19:52 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 11:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 13:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-23 15:52 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-24 11:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 14:39 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-03 17:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 12:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 22:58 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 21:41 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 11:08 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 22:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 01:01 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-22 11:54 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 23:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 23:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 12:01 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 03:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 04:22 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-23 13:55 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:08 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 15:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-24 14:02 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 05:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 13:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Delmer Tupalo <rptm@lmlelodl.el> - 2023-08-20 18:44 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:29 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Travis Bazili <aail@ttttviat.sv> - 2023-08-23 09:38 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:48 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Clarence Talkovsky <nskl@eccaryec.kv> - 2023-08-23 11:53 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 23:21 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 07:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:13 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:23 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:26 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 10:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 09:32 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 18:56 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 15:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-24 14:02 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-24 11:36 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-25 21:45 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-19 11:22 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-20 11:52 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Brett Harkharov <aaah@rthtrath.rk> - 2023-08-19 17:12 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 08:08 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 02:50 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Chico Patsalo <tpac@slsialct.ac> - 2023-08-19 10:41 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 12:22 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-23 14:45 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 03:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 08:36 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 19:18 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 17:01 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-20 12:13 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 17:52 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 14:40 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 09:12 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 00:32 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 11:24 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:31 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 14:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 12:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-17 22:40 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 15:06 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 06:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 11:14 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 18:40 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Shon Babukh <koun@bnbuboab.ob> - 2023-08-18 23:38 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 20:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-08-18 13:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 15:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 20:04 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:37 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 12:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 13:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-20 01:55 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 19:19 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 15:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 16:15 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 18:20 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 19:11 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:02 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-20 07:07 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:59 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 12:39 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:25 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 20:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 21:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:03 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 22:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 00:35 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 21:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 10:36 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-20 22:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 10:03 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:50 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 17:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:34 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 22:42 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 15:30 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:12 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 13:38 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:05 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:41 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:48 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-21 19:11 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 18:56 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-21 23:33 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:13 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 22:24 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 20:34 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 21:53 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-22 09:58 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:19 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 22:25 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 10:47 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 11:28 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-22 14:06 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 22:17 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-08-22 23:20 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 21:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 10:46 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 00:44 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Colby Zolotar <bolr@obzooota.yr> - 2023-08-24 09:32 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 10:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-24 14:28 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 21:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-24 06:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:26 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 10:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 22:21 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-23 01:24 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 22:59 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-21 23:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-22 15:19 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-22 17:49 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Evenezer Peltser <etpv@pverreet.zz> - 2023-08-23 11:04 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 20:04 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-08-21 21:25 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 14:18 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:43 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-19 00:13 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:15 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-20 10:38 +0200
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-18 18:43 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 16:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-19 14:51 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 16:50 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 19:01 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:06 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:10 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:17 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 16:26 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-22 01:31 -0400
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 01:00 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Williard Bah <rhab@ihdiadrd.lw> - 2023-08-23 10:30 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 05:57 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Basil Hariton <athi@iaribinh.bo> - 2023-08-23 11:51 +0000
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-23 07:48 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-21 20:07 -0500
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:21 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 17:41 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 18:07 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:52 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 19:58 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 11:30 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 08:51 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 09:55 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-28 15:20 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: Ken Seto <setoken47@gmail.com> - 2023-08-29 06:09 -0700
Re: List of Critics of Relativity: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-08-29 09:45 -0700
Page 11 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 18 Next page →
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 11:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ubtcsc$1du4p$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #618341 |
On 8/20/2023 1:15 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Sunday, August 20, 2023 at 12:10:12 AM UTC-3, Dono. wrote: > > <snip> > >> Despite the rabid lefturd tilt towards force feeding critical race theory and other rubbish of the same kind, the US high school students still manage to score in the top 3 at the math/physics/chemistry Olympiad. For how long, remains to be seen.... >> At the same time, UK, France, Germany bring up the trailing end..... > > Russia is banned, asshole. > > If not, they would make all sort of new orifices in participants, judges and public. What, are you claiming the 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ians卐 would machine-gun the Olympics or something if invited? I know they target civilians but even they aren't that bad!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brett Harkharov <aaah@rthtrath.rk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 17:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ubqt5q$unoj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #618268 |
Dono. wrote: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 2:49:08 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden > wrote: >> Even half a century ago that was a myth. When I was doing my post-doc >> at Berkeley (1967–1970) someone claimed to me that American education, > > The simple reason is that that is their ticket for remaining in the US. > As to the superiority in the education system, has it occurred to you > that this is why they flock to Berkley, Stanford, MIT, etc? this fucking imbecile is saying himself they are buying "education" in the corrupt capitalist america. It's about making money, fucking stupid, how can that ever be an education. You sack of shit. you also changed your name and moved to america with your cousiness, as family. You disgusting traitor of the country of your birth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-21 08:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ubvnkm$2g1n$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #618244 |
On 8/19/2023 3:22 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote: > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> Paul Alsing wrote: >>> >>> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:08:06╯AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen: >>> >>>> Relativity has never been rationally defended and never can be. >>> >>> On the contrary, relativity has never been rationally defeated, yet. It >>> may eventually be modified and even defeated, but it won't be by a crank >>> who does not even know high school physics! >> >> "high school physics"???? Who teachers "high school physics"???? >> >> >> >> Only 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have a degree in physics or >> physics education. >> Almost 1/3 of all high school physics teachers have taken fewer than 3 >> college physics classes. >> 90% of middle school students are taught physical science by a teacher >> lacking a major or certification in the physical sciences (chemistry, >> geology, general science or physics). > > Let me guess, you are American? > >> Our local and regional school districts have had substantial difficulty >> finding and retaining qualified physics teachers. 52% of New York City >> high schools do not even offer physics. >> Of all school subjects, Physics has the most severe teacher shortage, >> followed by math and chemistry. There are large surpluses of biology and >> earth science teachers. > > And you have had in idiot in charge > who wanted to make America great again. > That involved mostly real estate swindling > and a surfeit of lawyers fighting each other. > > The idea that the erstwhile greatness of the USA was based > on superior science and technology seems to have escaped him, > > Jan Wow... She is a "Bitch of USA" and at the same time allows herself to speak like that to an American. When Starmaker says bullshit, you respect that! You understand? You're his Bitch. Don't ever forget the contract. His tax money is spent to protect you, and in turn you agreed to be his Bitch! Respect what Starmaker tells you or others here, Bitch. Well, do that except for a case that you might be also a Jewess. Jews, American or not, aren't bitches of anybody. No Modern Human is a bitch of any other entity. Doesn't matter where they live or what citizenship they have. But if you're not a Jew and reside somewhere in Europe other than Russia and her friends countries, your identity is, "Bitch of USA." -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 22:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e50c5890-6442-4d64-8403-ec55ab0d860cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618147 |
On Friday, 18 August 2023 at 20:16:21 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > Relativity has never been rationally defended and never can be. > On the contrary, relativity has never been rationally defeated, yet. Oh, your Shit wasn't even consistent. It has been proven here many times, but, of course, a fanatic worshipping idiot will accept no proof.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 02:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ubpomn$lgf3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #618147 |
On 8/18/2023 2:16 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >> Relativity has never been rationally defended and never can be. > > On the contrary, relativity has never been rationally defeated, yet. It may eventually be modified and even defeated, but it won't be by a crank who does not even know high school physics! Relativity only has to be defeated *once*, like any other theory. It is noteworthy that it never has been defeated. Even Einstein noted that, in response to some group "100 Scientists against Einstein" or some similar name. He commented he only needed one of them. Here it is, with well over 100 years of cranks and crackpots whining over relativity, only needing just one disproof, but so far...nothing... So expect to hear the cranks whining impotently for the next 100 years...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chico Patsalo <tpac@slsialct.ac> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 10:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ubq694$oseu$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #618238 |
Volney wrote: > Relativity only has to be defeated *once*, like any other theory. It is > noteworthy that it never has been defeated. > Even Einstein noted that, in response to some group "100 Scientists > against Einstein" or some similar name. He commented he only needed one > of them. yes indeed. I think Einstine changed his name and moved with his cousin, 𝗮_𝗳𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝘆, to capitalist america. 𝗛𝗶𝘀_𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹_𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲 is not even Einstine. They chose this name because of pronunciation. Einstine,_𝗼𝗻𝗲_𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗲. 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 12:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ubti4j$b2o4$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #618250 |
On 8/19/2023 5:41 AM, Chico Patsalo wrote: > Volney wrote: > >> Relativity only has to be defeated *once*, like any other theory. Chico, let me borrow your post to reply to the above false information. Thanks. _Every_ theory in physics, its validation as well as its refutal, must be repeatable and must get repeated over and over for it to stand. Physics is not math! I don't think Vulva has physics background. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-23 14:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8a46f876-2878-48dd-a32a-7969cc6eff5cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618385 |
On August 20, Physfitfreak wrote: >>> Relativity only has to be defeated *once*, like any other theory. > > _Every_ theory in physics, its validation as well as its refutal, must > be repeatable and must get repeated over and over for it to stand. What if it's a time varying theory, or the law of nature is time varying? -- Rich
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 03:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b5e4da06-05bf-46e8-8d31-739b4c6742c5n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618238 |
On Saturday, 19 August 2023 at 08:50:03 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > On 8/18/2023 2:16 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > >> Relativity has never been rationally defended and never can be. > > > > On the contrary, relativity has never been rationally defeated, yet. It may eventually be modified and even defeated, but it won't be by a crank who does not even know high school physics! > > Relativity only has to be defeated *once*, like any other theory. And do you still believe that 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy is some "Newton mode"? You're such an amazing idiot, stupid Mike, even considering the standards of your moronic religion. > It is > noteworthy that it never has been defeated. It is also noteworthy that in the meantime in the real world - forbidden by your idiot gurus improper clocks keep measuring improper t'=t in improper seconds.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 08:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kkbuqpF8dkjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618238 |
On 8/19/2023 1:50 AM, Volney wrote: > On 8/18/2023 2:16 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: >> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark >> Crossen wrote: >> >>> Relativity has never been rationally defended and never can be. >> >> On the contrary, relativity has never been rationally defeated, yet. >> It may eventually be modified and even defeated, but it won't be by a >> crank who does not even know high school physics! > > Relativity only has to be defeated *once*, like any other theory. It is > noteworthy that it never has been defeated. > > Even Einstein noted that, in response to some group "100 Scientists > against Einstein" or some similar name. He commented he only needed one > of them. > > Here it is, with well over 100 years of cranks and crackpots whining > over relativity, only needing just one disproof, but so far...nothing... > So expect to hear the cranks whining impotently for the next 100 years... I asked Jane, repeatedly, "where's the beef?" That meaning anything of substance that would defeat relativity. Nothing forthcoming. Then here came Laurence, again lots of arm waving and claims that relativity has been refuted, and again *nothing* of substance, just the repetitive whining that this one or that one has shown that relativity is defeated. All bun, no meat, with any of these claims. I guess it proves some people can live on carbs alone. That can't be a very good life.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 07:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0fffabfe-8271-4413-9923-353b2f0420d1n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618260 |
On Saturday, 19 August 2023 at 15:36:30 UTC+2, whodat wrote: > On 8/19/2023 1:50 AM, Volney wrote: > > On 8/18/2023 2:16 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > >> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark > >> Crossen wrote: > >> > >>> Relativity has never been rationally defended and never can be. > >> > >> On the contrary, relativity has never been rationally defeated, yet. > >> It may eventually be modified and even defeated, but it won't be by a > >> crank who does not even know high school physics! > > > > Relativity only has to be defeated *once*, like any other theory. It is > > noteworthy that it never has been defeated. > > > > Even Einstein noted that, in response to some group "100 Scientists > > against Einstein" or some similar name. He commented he only needed one > > of them. > > > > Here it is, with well over 100 years of cranks and crackpots whining > > over relativity, only needing just one disproof, but so far...nothing... > > So expect to hear the cranks whining impotently for the next 100 years... > I asked Jane, repeatedly, "where's the beef?" That meaning anything > of substance that would defeat relativity. Nothing forthcoming. Then > here came Laurence, again lots of arm waving and claims that relativity > has been refuted, and again *nothing* of substance, just the repetitive > whining that this one or that one has shown that relativity is defeated. > > All bun, no meat, with any of these claims. Feel free to enchant the reality, the mumble of your idiot guru has been proven inconsistent and the only thing the worshippers can do about it is pretending they didn't notice.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 07:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5e093c55-ab74-4aa0-944d-c0c84617c22en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618260 |
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 10:36:30 AM UTC-3, whodat wrote: > On 8/19/2023 1:50 AM, Volney wrote: > > On 8/18/2023 2:16 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > >> On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark > >> Crossen wrote: > >> > >>> Relativity has never been rationally defended and never can be. > >> > >> On the contrary, relativity has never been rationally defeated, yet. > >> It may eventually be modified and even defeated, but it won't be by a > >> crank who does not even know high school physics! > > > > Relativity only has to be defeated *once*, like any other theory. It is > > noteworthy that it never has been defeated. > > > > Even Einstein noted that, in response to some group "100 Scientists > > against Einstein" or some similar name. He commented he only needed one > > of them. > > > > Here it is, with well over 100 years of cranks and crackpots whining > > over relativity, only needing just one disproof, but so far...nothing... > > So expect to hear the cranks whining impotently for the next 100 years... > I asked Jane, repeatedly, "where's the beef?" That meaning anything > of substance that would defeat relativity. Nothing forthcoming. Then > here came Laurence, again lots of arm waving and claims that relativity > has been refuted, and again *nothing* of substance, just the repetitive > whining that this one or that one has shown that relativity is defeated. > > All bun, no meat, with any of these claims. I guess it proves some > people can live on carbs alone. That can't be a very good life. It's very simple. It's only required that, finally, the constancy of c on vacuum be disproved, because vacuum doesn't exist. Vacuum is a convenient FICTION, where n = 1 in the ENTIRE UNIVERSE. Once it is learned that n < 1 or n > 1 in different parts of the infinite universe, you'll have FTL c' = c/n (for n < 1). And all the farce of Lorentz transforms will implode, along with 4-vector jargon and the idiocy of LCDM, BBT, etc., will fade away. One possible way is to travel 1,000 billion ly far away, measure c' there and come back with results. Oh! Wait! Almost 2,000,000,000 years to know the answer. I think that the sophism on which relativity is based will last for a while. As well as the heresy that God doesn't exist, so the pagan religion of relativity can be safe for that long.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 19:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ubrijb$11khc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #618267 |
On 8/19/2023 10:43 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 10:36:30 AM UTC-3, whodat wrote: >> On 8/19/2023 1:50 AM, Volney wrote: >>> Relativity only has to be defeated *once*, like any other theory. It is >>> noteworthy that it never has been defeated. >>> >>> Even Einstein noted that, in response to some group "100 Scientists >>> against Einstein" or some similar name. He commented he only needed one >>> of them. >>> >>> Here it is, with well over 100 years of cranks and crackpots whining >>> over relativity, only needing just one disproof, but so far...nothing... >>> So expect to hear the cranks whining impotently for the next 100 years... >> I asked Jane, repeatedly, "where's the beef?" That meaning anything >> of substance that would defeat relativity. Nothing forthcoming. Then >> here came Laurence, again lots of arm waving and claims that relativity >> has been refuted, and again *nothing* of substance, just the repetitive >> whining that this one or that one has shown that relativity is defeated. >> >> All bun, no meat, with any of these claims. I guess it proves some >> people can live on carbs alone. That can't be a very good life. > > It's very simple. It's only required that, finally, the constancy of c on vacuum be disproved, because vacuum doesn't exist. > > Vacuum is a convenient FICTION, where n = 1 in the ENTIRE UNIVERSE. > > Once it is learned that n < 1 or n > 1 in different parts of the infinite universe, you'll have FTL c' = c/n (for n < 1). Now that would violate the first postulate (not just the second), wouldn't it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 17:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cb14a1f1-67e6-418a-b8ee-300a38016ce9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618322 |
On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 8:18:07 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: > On 8/19/2023 10:43 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 10:36:30 AM UTC-3, whodat wrote: > >> On 8/19/2023 1:50 AM, Volney wrote: > > >>> Relativity only has to be defeated *once*, like any other theory. It is > >>> noteworthy that it never has been defeated. > >>> > >>> Even Einstein noted that, in response to some group "100 Scientists > >>> against Einstein" or some similar name. He commented he only needed one > >>> of them. > >>> > >>> Here it is, with well over 100 years of cranks and crackpots whining > >>> over relativity, only needing just one disproof, but so far...nothing... > >>> So expect to hear the cranks whining impotently for the next 100 years... > > >> I asked Jane, repeatedly, "where's the beef?" That meaning anything > >> of substance that would defeat relativity. Nothing forthcoming. Then > >> here came Laurence, again lots of arm waving and claims that relativity > >> has been refuted, and again *nothing* of substance, just the repetitive > >> whining that this one or that one has shown that relativity is defeated. > >> > >> All bun, no meat, with any of these claims. I guess it proves some > >> people can live on carbs alone. That can't be a very good life. > > > > It's very simple. It's only required that, finally, the constancy of c on vacuum be disproved, because vacuum doesn't exist. > > > > Vacuum is a convenient FICTION, where n = 1 in the ENTIRE UNIVERSE. > > > > Once it is learned that n < 1 or n > 1 in different parts of the infinite universe, you'll have FTL c' = c/n (for n < 1). > > Now that would violate the first postulate (not just the second), > wouldn't it. Permittivity and permeability are the foundations of Maxwell's theory and the basis of modern RF Engineering and physics. This is beyond the matter of light speed and electromagnetism. Them involve the ENTIRE science of electricity and magnetism. But what could you know, Mr. PC repairman. c₀ =1/√(μ₀ε₀) Z₀ =√(μ₀/ε₀) = 2αh/e² = 376.730313668 Ω , PER DEFINITION. e is the elementary charge α is the fine structure constant h is Planck's constant CONSTANTS IN THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE? GTFO! Try to measure them in the center of Andromeda. What? You can't?. Then shut the fuck up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-20 12:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ubte2h$1eapc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #618327 |
On 8/19/2023 8:01 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 8:18:07 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: >> On 8/19/2023 10:43 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: >>> On Saturday, August 19, 2023 at 10:36:30 AM UTC-3, whodat wrote: >>>> On 8/19/2023 1:50 AM, Volney wrote: >> >>>>> Relativity only has to be defeated *once*, like any other theory. It is >>>>> noteworthy that it never has been defeated. >>>>> >>>>> Even Einstein noted that, in response to some group "100 Scientists >>>>> against Einstein" or some similar name. He commented he only needed one >>>>> of them. >>>>> >>>>> Here it is, with well over 100 years of cranks and crackpots whining >>>>> over relativity, only needing just one disproof, but so far...nothing... >>>>> So expect to hear the cranks whining impotently for the next 100 years... >> >>>> I asked Jane, repeatedly, "where's the beef?" That meaning anything >>>> of substance that would defeat relativity. Nothing forthcoming. Then >>>> here came Laurence, again lots of arm waving and claims that relativity >>>> has been refuted, and again *nothing* of substance, just the repetitive >>>> whining that this one or that one has shown that relativity is defeated. >>>> >>>> All bun, no meat, with any of these claims. I guess it proves some >>>> people can live on carbs alone. That can't be a very good life. >>> >>> It's very simple. It's only required that, finally, the constancy of c on vacuum be disproved, because vacuum doesn't exist. >>> >>> Vacuum is a convenient FICTION, where n = 1 in the ENTIRE UNIVERSE. >>> >>> Once it is learned that n < 1 or n > 1 in different parts of the infinite universe, you'll have FTL c' = c/n (for n < 1). >> >> Now that would violate the first postulate (not just the second), >> wouldn't it. > > Permittivity and permeability are the foundations of Maxwell's theory and the basis of modern RF Engineering and physics. > > This is beyond the matter of light speed and electromagnetism. Them involve the ENTIRE science of electricity and magnetism. > > But what could you know, Mr. PC repairman. > > c₀ =1/√(μ₀ε₀) You just contradicted yourself when you claimed "This is beyond the matter of light speed and electromagnetism." This is the speed of light according to Maxwell. > CONSTANTS IN THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE? GTFO! That's what the first postulate states. Do you think that μ₀ and/or ε₀ are different elsewhere? That would have to be true if c was different elsewhere. > > Try to measure them in the center of Andromeda. > > What? You can't?. Then shut the fuck up. Astronomers and physicists are much more clever than you are. They come up with ideas to measure such things indirectly, what would happen if such constants were different. An obvious example may be "what if ε₀ were different in Andromeda?" One would say "The speed of light there would be different because Maxwell said c=1/√(μ₀ε₀)". They'd measure the speed of light in Andromeda and see it's c, of course, and conclude "It appears that ε₀, or at least the product μ₀ε₀, is the same in Andromeda as it is here."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-19 17:52 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qfpvxs.1o92vqzhtehnsN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #618238 |
Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 8/18/2023 2:16 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 11:08:06?AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen: > > > >> Relativity has never been rationally defended and never can be. > > > > On the contrary, relativity has never been rationally defeated, yet. It > > may eventually be modified and even defeated, but it won't be by a crank > > who does not even know high school physics! > > Relativity only has to be defeated *once*, like any other theory. It is > noteworthy that it never has been defeated. And anyway, only cranks imaginge that scientific theories can be 'defeated'. Real scientists know that scientific theories can only be replaced by better ones. (which must conserve the achievements of previous theories) > Even Einstein noted that, in response to some group "100 Scientists > against Einstein" or some similar name. He commented he only needed one > of them. No, 'Hundert Autoren gegen...' That is 'Hundred -Authors- against...' They didn't dare to call themselves 'Wissenschaftler' (scientists) > Here it is, with well over 100 years of cranks and crackpots whining > over relativity, only needing just one disproof, but so far...nothing... > So expect to hear the cranks whining impotently for the next 100 years... Yes, it has become sectarian, and much of it is repetitive, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 13:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b11d3ed5-92e6-45a8-b4a0-d18bb91f4878n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618143 |
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 2:56:34 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > Here is what Albert Einstein 'thinks' of your list of his Critics... > > > According to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said: > > 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.' > > > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/ > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf > > ""Why were men of science opposed > to your theory when you first made it > known ?" > "No men of science," he replied, em > phasizing the last'word, "were against > the theory." > "But there was some opposition?" > "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that > was purely political. Even the physi > cists who opposed my theory did so for > political reasons?in my opinion, o' > course." > "What do you mean when you say > the opposition was political?" > "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's > answer. "Because I am a Jew." "" > > > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. That's how the cretin started to pay back to his MASTERS, who helped him in his path of fraud, plagiarism, theft and privileges, making him worldwide famous IN ORDER TO PARADE HIM AROUND THE GLOBE AS A FUCKING CIRCUS MONKEY. They did it ONLY in Zionists cities like here, in Argentina, where he visited the most important Jewish circles (Buenos Aires, La Plata, etc.), PATRONIZED BY THE BRITISH EMBASSY. In those years (1875-1936), UK WAS THE OWNER OF ARGENTINA: Railroads, energy, telephony, agriculture, cattle, food processing, steel, oil, etc. The wealthiest people in Argentina were Jews, who partnered with britons, The argentinian traitors (local elite) were happy to have a very small part of the cake. Even when it was the second wealthiest country in America, after USA, 95% of the population BARELY SURVIVED. Who had a job was A SLAVE of these MFkers. After the "infamous decade" of the '30s, when britons were leaving and selling assets to USA, the road for PERON to emerge was settled. But he had to settle with local Jews and with the global jew elite, being the third country to recognize Israel in 1948. As of today, Jews dominate the economy of the country in almost every single field. Mercado Libre (e-Bay) is the first company in the country, with incomes twice those of the companies in the energy fields. Galperin is a Jew, masquerading as owner of Mercado Libre, but SOROS is behind. But this cretin is living in Uruguay, to avoid taxes. ************************************************** New-York tribune., April 03, 1921 ZIONISTS GREET EINSTEIN, HERE FOR PALESTINE I thence to the Hotel Commodore, where the FOUR VISITORS will stay for a time. The whole East Side was decorated with Zionist and American flags and crowds lined the streets to greet the members cf the Zionist committee. Early in the morning, when the Rotterdam arrived, newspaper men were unable to get Professor Einstein to talk at all. ...... "What do you mean when you say ' the opposition was political?" "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist'a answer. "Because I am a Jew." ...... Then he explained that his mission in this country was to help arouse interest in the formation of a university in Palestine, at which ho hopes to lecture, and said that he probably would lecture at Princeton first, it being the first American university to invite him. ..... Dr. Weizman, explaining the purpose of the Commlttee's mission, said it wanted to arouse interest in this country toward the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. "I am not prepared to say," he said in answer to a question, "HOW THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT is disposed toward the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine. But what we want first is to make emigration to Palestine in large numbers possible and 'to develop the land, and then perhaps a state will grow up naturally." He said the present Jewish population of Palestine was 100,000 and immigrants wore arriving at the rate of1000 a month, rhiefly from "what was once the Russian Empire."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 13:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <78b37419-1357-4278-9865-51a36a36c9f9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618173 |
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 1:47:04 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 2:56:34 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > Here is what Albert Einstein 'thinks' of your list of his Critics... > > > > > > According to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said: > > > > 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.' > > > > > > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ > > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/ > > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf > > > > ""Why were men of science opposed > > to your theory when you first made it > > known ?" > > "No men of science," he replied, em > > phasizing the last'word, "were against > > the theory." > > "But there was some opposition?" > > "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that > > was purely political. Even the physi > > cists who opposed my theory did so for > > political reasons?in my opinion, o' > > course." > > "What do you mean when you say > > the opposition was political?" > > "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's > > answer. "Because I am a Jew." "" > > > > > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > That's how the cretin started to pay back to his MASTERS, who helped him in his path of fraud, plagiarism, > theft and privileges, making him worldwide famous IN ORDER TO PARADE HIM AROUND THE GLOBE AS A > FUCKING CIRCUS MONKEY. They did it ONLY in Zionists cities like here, in Argentina, where he visited the > most important Jewish circles (Buenos Aires, La Plata, etc.), PATRONIZED BY THE BRITISH EMBASSY. > > In those years (1875-1936), UK WAS THE OWNER OF ARGENTINA: Railroads, energy, telephony, agriculture, > cattle, food processing, steel, oil, etc. The wealthiest people in Argentina were Jews, who partnered with britons, > The argentinian traitors (local elite) were happy to have a very small part of the cake. > > Even when it was the second wealthiest country in America, after USA, 95% of the population BARELY SURVIVED. > Who had a job was A SLAVE of these MFkers. > > After the "infamous decade" of the '30s, when britons were leaving and selling assets to USA, the road for PERON > to emerge was settled. But he had to settle with local Jews and with the global jew elite, being the third country to > recognize Israel in 1948. > > As of today, Jews dominate the economy of the country in almost every single field. > > Mercado Libre (e-Bay) is the first company in the country, with incomes twice those of the companies in the energy fields. > > Galperin is a Jew, masquerading as owner of Mercado Libre, but SOROS is behind. But this cretin is living in Uruguay, to avoid taxes. > > > ************************************************** > > New-York tribune., April 03, 1921 > > ZIONISTS GREET EINSTEIN, HERE FOR PALESTINE > > I thence to the Hotel Commodore, where the FOUR VISITORS will stay for a time. > The whole East Side was decorated with Zionist and American flags and crowds > lined the streets to greet the members cf the Zionist committee. > > Early in the morning, when the Rotterdam arrived, newspaper men were unable to > get Professor Einstein to talk at all. > ...... > "What do you mean when you say ' the opposition was political?" > "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist'a answer. "Because I am a Jew." > ...... > Then he explained that his mission in this country was to help arouse interest in the formation of a university in > Palestine, at which ho hopes to lecture, and said that he probably would lecture at Princeton first, it being the first > American university to invite him. > ..... > Dr. Weizman, explaining the purpose of the Commlttee's mission, said it wanted to arouse interest in this country toward the > establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. > > "I am not prepared to say," he said in answer to a question, "HOW THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT is disposed toward the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine. But what we want first is to make emigration to Palestine in large numbers possible and 'to develop the land, and then perhaps a state will grow up naturally." > > He said the present Jewish population of Palestine was 100,000 and immigrants wore arriving at the rate of1000 a month, rhiefly from "what was once the Russian Empire." Einstein pretended to be a victim when he was among the most privileged people in all of history.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 14:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ce0bcb76-12cf-42af-a163-72909e6a6eden@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #618173 |
On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 1:47:04 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 2:56:34 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > Here is what Albert Einstein 'thinks' of your list of his Critics... > > > > > > According to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said: > > > > 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.' > > > > > > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ > > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/ > > http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf > > > > ""Why were men of science opposed > > to your theory when you first made it > > known ?" > > "No men of science," he replied, em > > phasizing the last'word, "were against > > the theory." > > "But there was some opposition?" > > "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that > > was purely political. Even the physi > > cists who opposed my theory did so for > > political reasons?in my opinion, o' > > course." > > "What do you mean when you say > > the opposition was political?" > > "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's > > answer. "Because I am a Jew." "" > > > > > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > That's how the cretin started to pay back to his MASTERS, who helped him in his path of fraud, plagiarism, > theft and privileges, making him worldwide famous IN ORDER TO PARADE HIM AROUND THE GLOBE AS A > FUCKING CIRCUS MONKEY. They did it ONLY in Zionists cities like here, in Argentina, where he visited the > most important Jewish circles (Buenos Aires, La Plata, etc.), PATRONIZED BY THE BRITISH EMBASSY. > > In those years (1875-1936), UK WAS THE OWNER OF ARGENTINA: Railroads, energy, telephony, agriculture, > cattle, food processing, steel, oil, etc. The wealthiest people in Argentina were Jews, who partnered with britons, > The argentinian traitors (local elite) were happy to have a very small part of the cake. > > Even when it was the second wealthiest country in America, after USA, 95% of the population BARELY SURVIVED. > Who had a job was A SLAVE of these MFkers. > > After the "infamous decade" of the '30s, when britons were leaving and selling assets to USA, the road for PERON > to emerge was settled. But he had to settle with local Jews and with the global jew elite, being the third country to > recognize Israel in 1948. > > As of today, Jews dominate the economy of the country in almost every single field. > > Mercado Libre (e-Bay) is the first company in the country, with incomes twice those of the companies in the energy fields. > > Galperin is a Jew, masquerading as owner of Mercado Libre, but SOROS is behind. But this cretin is living in Uruguay, to avoid taxes. > > > ************************************************** > > New-York tribune., April 03, 1921 > > ZIONISTS GREET EINSTEIN, HERE FOR PALESTINE > > I thence to the Hotel Commodore, where the FOUR VISITORS will stay for a time. > The whole East Side was decorated with Zionist and American flags and crowds > lined the streets to greet the members cf the Zionist committee. > > Early in the morning, when the Rotterdam arrived, newspaper men were unable to > get Professor Einstein to talk at all. > ...... > "What do you mean when you say ' the opposition was political?" > "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist'a answer. "Because I am a Jew." > ...... > Then he explained that his mission in this country was to help arouse interest in the formation of a university in > Palestine, at which ho hopes to lecture, and said that he probably would lecture at Princeton first, it being the first > American university to invite him. > ..... > Dr. Weizman, explaining the purpose of the Commlttee's mission, said it wanted to arouse interest in this country toward the > establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. > > "I am not prepared to say," he said in answer to a question, "HOW THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT is disposed toward the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine. But what we want first is to make emigration to Palestine in large numbers possible and 'to develop the land, and then perhaps a state will grow up naturally." > > He said the present Jewish population of Palestine was 100,000 and immigrants wore arriving at the rate of1000 a month, rhiefly from "what was once the Russian Empire." I actually think they are right. We shouldn't call them relativists. They are Einstein apologists.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-18 09:12 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kk8ju0Fmn2aU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #618039 |
On 2023-08-17 20:40:10 +0000, J. J. Lodder said: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:15:13?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> List of Critics of Relativity: >>> [list] >>> Einstein's reaction on learning about the book: >>> "Hundert Autoren Gegen Einstein" (1931) >>> is still to the point: >>> "Wenn sie recht hätten, würde einer genügen." >>> (English) >>> "One would have sufficed, if they had been right", >>> >>> Jan >> Here's an English translation so you can give me chapter and verse: >> HUNDRED AUTHORS AGAINST EINSTEIN -ROUGH TRANSLATION Roger J Anderton >> R.J.Anderton@btinternet > > Wrong way round: you started it, > you should point out someone in it who made a valuable contribution. > > BTW, you are again making it obvious > that you are praising a book that you have not even glanced at. That's what he does. He's rapidly overtaking Ken --Papers in Science and Nature-- Seto and Pentcho ==Never quote qualifications that undermine your prejudice== Valev as the champion liar in this group. > > If you had, you would have known > that they never succeeded in getting anywhere near > that 100 authors that the title promisses. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 18 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 18 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web