Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #616068 > unrolled thread

Re: Evaporation or radiation of fast particles leaving a BH

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Evaporation or radiation of fast particles leaving a BH Paul Vestman <mnmu@mpsllpnn.tn> - 2023-07-25 22:05 +0000
    Re: Evaporation or radiation of fast particles leaving a BH Telly Verba <lelt@rlrlrbre.ye> - 2023-07-25 22:36 +0000
      Re: Evaporation or radiation of fast particles leaving a BH "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 16:13 -0700
        Re: Evaporation or radiation of fast particles leaving a BH Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 08:56 +0200
          Re: Evaporation or radiation of fast particles leaving a BH Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 00:47 -0700

#616068 — Re: Evaporation or radiation of fast particles leaving a BH

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> how does it get its escape velocity nearest the event horizon in order
> for it leave a BH...?
> without falling back? how could it overcome maximum escape velocity?
> Would not that evaporation radiation slow down leaving and then tend to
> fall back and get to  increase a black hole gravity...?

the 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗴 is the only thing coming into existence, without a 
r𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲_𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲, nor a 𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲_𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺. Those days, 𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱_𝗼𝗳_𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 
transcended from another dimension. That's why the speed of light 
𝗶𝘀_𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁. Nothing in this universe can change the speed of light in 
vacuum.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#616070

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 3:05:54 PM UTC-7, Paul Vestman wrote:
>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>> > how does it get its escape velocity nearest the event horizon in
>> > order for it leave a BH...?
>> > without falling back? how could it overcome maximum escape velocity?
>> > Would not that evaporation radiation slow down leaving and then tend
>> > to fall back and get to increase a black hole gravity...?
>> the 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗴 is the only thing coming into existence, without a
>> r𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲_𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲, nor a 𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲_𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺. Those days,
>> 𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱_𝗼𝗳_𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 transcended from another dimension. That's why the
>> speed of light 𝗶𝘀_𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁. Nothing in this universe can change the
>> speed of light in vacuum.
> 
> You have to many aliases...

that's what Einstine didn't undrestand. Why the 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱_𝗼𝗳_𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 in vacuum 
𝗵𝗮𝘀_𝘁𝗼_𝗯𝗲_𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁, without regard to anything. Many 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘀𝘁_𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀 around 
here, still don't undrestand.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616071

On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 3:36:32 PM UTC-7, Telly Verba wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 3:05:54 PM UTC-7, Paul Vestman wrote: 
> >> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >> 
> >> > how does it get its escape velocity nearest the event horizon in 
> >> > order for it leave a BH...? 
> >> > without falling back? how could it overcome maximum escape velocity? 
> >> > Would not that evaporation radiation slow down leaving and then tend 
> >> > to fall back and get to increase a black hole gravity...? 
> >> the 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗴 is the only thing coming into existence, without a 
> >> r𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲_𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲, nor a 𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲_𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺. Those days, 
> >> 𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱_𝗼𝗳_𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 transcended from another dimension. That's why the 
> >> speed of light 𝗶𝘀_𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁. Nothing in this universe can change the 
> >> speed of light in vacuum. 
> >
> > You have to many aliases... 
> 
> that's what Einstine didn't undrestand.

That you have to many aliases?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616084

On 2023-07-25 23:13:04 +0000, mitchr...@gmail.com said:

> On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 3:36:32 PM UTC-7, Telly Verba wrote:
> 
>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 3:05:54 PM UTC-7, Paul Vestman wrote: 
>>> 
>>>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> how does it get its escape velocity nearest the event horizon in 
>>>>> 
>>>>> order for it leave a BH...? 
>>>>> 
>>>>> without falling back? how could it overcome maximum escape velocity? 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Would not that evaporation radiation slow down leaving and then tend 
>>>>> 
>>>>> to fall back and get to increase a black hole gravity...? 
>>>>> 
>>>> the 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗴 is the only thing coming into existence, without a 
>>>> 
>>>> r𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲_𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲, nor a 𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲_𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺. 
>>>> Those days, 
>>>> 
>>>> 𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱_𝗼𝗳_𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 transcended from another dimension. 
>>>> That's why the 
>>>> 
>>>> speed of light 𝗶𝘀_𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁. Nothing in this universe can change the 
>>>> 
>>>> speed of light in vacuum. 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> You have to many aliases... 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> that's what Einstine didn't undrestand.

5 points for each mention of "Einstien", "Hawkins" or "Feynmann"
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> That you have to many aliases?
> 
> 
> 


-- 
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#616086

On Wednesday, 26 July 2023 at 08:56:57 UTC+2, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> On 2023-07-25 23:13:04 +0000, mitchr...@gmail.com said: 
> 
> > On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 3:36:32 PM UTC-7, Telly Verba wrote: 
> > 
> >> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >> 
> >>> On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 3:05:54 PM UTC-7, Paul Vestman wrote: 
> >>> 
> >>>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> how does it get its escape velocity nearest the event horizon in 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> order for it leave a BH...? 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> without falling back? how could it overcome maximum escape velocity? 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Would not that evaporation radiation slow down leaving and then tend 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> to fall back and get to increase a black hole gravity...? 
> >>>>> 
> >>>> the 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗴 is the only thing coming into existence, without a 
> >>>> 
> >>>> r𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲_𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲, nor a 𝗰𝗼𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲_𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺. 
> >>>> Those days, 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱_𝗼𝗳_𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 transcended from another dimension. 
> >>>> That's why the 
> >>>> 
> >>>> speed of light 𝗶𝘀_𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁. Nothing in this universe can change the 
> >>>> 
> >>>> speed of light in vacuum. 
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> You have to many aliases... 
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> that's what Einstine didn't undrestand.
> 5 points for each mention of "Einstien", "Hawkins" or "Feynmann"

And don't forget - 5 points for your idiot guru Tom
for every word written with capital letters.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web