Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #614924 > unrolled thread

Doctor Hachel's equation

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Doctor Hachel's equation Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-10 17:42 +0000
    Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Bill <davos2329@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 11:44 -0700
      Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-10 19:19 +0000
    Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 20:53 +0200
      Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-10 19:33 +0000
        Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 07:27 +0200
    Re: Doctor Hachel's equation "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-07-11 12:27 +0200
      Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-11 10:53 +0000
      Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 15:12 +0200
      Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-11 23:13 +0000
        Re: Doctor Hachel's equation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 20:33 -0700
          Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-12 10:00 +0000
            Re: Doctor Hachel's equation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 14:05 -0700
              Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Dillan Vassilikos <lisa@osidsadl.ss> - 2023-07-12 21:58 +0000
                Re: Doctor Hachel's equation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 19:43 -0700
                  Re: Doctor Hachel's equation whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-12 21:50 -0500
                    Re: Doctor Hachel's equation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 21:13 -0700
                      Re: Doctor Hachel's equation whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-13 00:45 -0500
                  Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Dann Anetakis <data@anasnnks.na> - 2023-07-13 14:13 +0000
                    Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-13 11:26 -0400
                      Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Faustino Patrianakos <rrta@taroritt.ak> - 2023-07-13 16:30 +0000
                      Re: Doctor Hachel's equation whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-13 12:03 -0500
                    Re: Doctor Hachel's equation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 20:13 -0700
                      Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Pascal Karameros <spar@easrsslc.rr> - 2023-07-14 09:48 +0000
                        Re: Doctor Hachel's equation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 15:11 -0700
                          Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Natalio Frangopoulos <lllf@fptaartr.lu> - 2023-07-14 23:45 +0000
                            Re: Doctor Hachel's equation whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-14 20:20 -0500
                              Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Random Manos <aaon@rmaddaon.no> - 2023-07-15 01:47 +0000
                                Re: Doctor Hachel's equation whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-14 20:55 -0500
                                  Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Bondie Ruvelas <isrs@llievbsd.ei> - 2023-07-15 02:18 +0000
                            Re: Doctor Hachel's equation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 19:39 -0700
                              Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Dickie Christou <krio@ekirtioo.ci> - 2023-07-15 19:46 +0000
                        Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-14 18:35 -0400
                          Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Wade Tsangaris <waas@raaeetir.ss> - 2023-07-14 23:34 +0000
                  Re: Doctor Hachel's equation RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-07-14 11:59 -0700
    Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-11 11:24 +0000
      Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-11 11:55 +0000
      Re: Doctor Hachel's equation Duston Christakos <ouch@kthttcnn.sd> - 2023-07-11 12:32 +0000

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#615163

Volney wrote:

> On 7/13/2023 10:13 AM, Dann Anetakis wrote:
>> JanPB wrote:
>>> Russia is a failed state.
>> 
>> *_Federation_*, not "state". Can't you read maps, look on a map, and
>> map in square kilometres.
> 
> OK, so Russia is a failed federation of failed states. Picky picky.

i beg you to reconsider:

*_I'm_Russian_* Performed By
*_Representatives_Of_Different_Nationalities_And_Regions_* Of Russia
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/YYCDuMgzWMwV

*_Katusha_in_40_languages_*
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/FUgPTOmVF9CL

america is a corporation shithole, with stolen land from Latin Mexico, as
such Texas, California, the west in general.

I tell you what a corporation is. They don't produce anything. What they
do is to steal the money from the people, that's what a corporation is.
Thus, a corporation is a thief.

*_US_cluster_bombs_already_in_Ukraine_* – military
https://%72t.com/russia/579647-cluster-munitions-ukraine-cnn/

the khazar goy, gay actor zelenske, sends these cluster bombs to detonate
either *_over_Hungary,_Moldova,_Romania_or_Polakia_*. As bombing own 
territory makes no sense. Wait and watch. The fascist america knows it 
perfectly.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615167

On 7/13/2023 10:26 AM, Volney wrote:
> On 7/13/2023 10:13 AM, Dann Anetakis wrote:
>> JanPB wrote:
> 
>>> Russia is a failed state.
>>
>> *_Federation_*, not "state". Can't you read maps, look on a map, and map
>> in square kilometres.
> 
> OK, so Russia is a failed federation of failed states.
> 
> Picky picky.

Attempting to shift the operative word is a useless exercise.

Does he think his boss will pat him on the head for stupidity?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615207

On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 7:13:33 AM UTC-7, Dann Anetakis wrote:
> JanPB wrote: 
> 
> >> >> No, we don't need any of that. 
> >> > 
> >> > You do. 
> >> you are correct. But it's too late to undrestand why it isn't done 
> >> sooner. 
> >> 
> >>*_Russia_mulls_plan_to_display_destroyed_NATO_hardware_outside_embassies_* 
> > 
> > Russia is a failed state.
> 
> *_Federation_*, not "state".

I'll take a failed federation then.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615235

JanPB wrote:

>> 
>>*_Russia_mulls_plan_to_display_destroyed_NATO_hardware_outside_embassies_*
>> > 
>> > Russia is a failed state.
>> 
>> *_Federation_*, not "state".
> 
> I'll take a̶ f̶a̶i̶l̶e̶d̶ f̶e̶d̶e̶r̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ then.

They just 𝙬𝙤𝙣_𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙩_𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙧𝙚_𝙛𝙪𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜_𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙤 around the globe. You 𝗳𝘂𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗿. 
Without Russia you wouldn't even exist. 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐚_𝐢𝐬_𝐚_𝐑𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐚𝐧_𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞, so talk 
correct Russianish. Fucking electricians.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615316

On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 2:49:02 AM UTC-7, Pascal Karameros wrote:
> JanPB wrote: 
> 
> >> 
> >>*_Russia_mulls_plan_to_display_destroyed_NATO_hardware_outside_embassies_* 
> >> > 
> >> > Russia is a failed state. 
> >> 
> >> *_Federation_*, not "state". 
> >
> > I'll take a̶ f̶a̶i̶l̶e̶d̶ f̶e̶d̶e̶r̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ then. 
> 
> They just 𝙬𝙤𝙣_𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙩_𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙧𝙚_𝙛𝙪𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜_𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙤 around the globe. 

What koolaid are you drinking?

> You 𝗳𝘂𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗿. 
> Without Russia you wouldn't even exist. 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐚_𝐢𝐬_𝐚_𝐑𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐚𝐧_𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞, so talk 
> correct Russianish. Fucking electricians.

Russia is a failed state which will hopefully fall apart on its own into smaller pieces whose
size will finally correspond to its true abilities and aspirations. Putin and Russia are
an international joke. The only reason anyone is even bothering to consider them
seriously is that they own nukes (which they stole, incidentally).

It's a pathetic POS country.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615338

JanPB wrote:

>> They just 𝙬𝙤𝙣_𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙩_𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙧𝙚_𝙛𝙪𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜_𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙤 around the globe.
> 
> What koolaid are you drinking?
> 
>> You 𝗳𝘂𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗿.
>> Without Russia you wouldn't even exist. 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐚_𝐢𝐬_𝐚_𝐑𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐚𝐧_𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞,
>> so talk correct Russianish. Fucking electricians.
> 
> Russia is a failed state which will hopefully fall apart on its own into

your momma is a polaker whore. You stupid electrician. Dictating Russia 
what to do. You stinking sack of subhuman excrement. There will be peace 
and prosperity with 𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙧_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙚_𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠_𝙩𝙤_𝙍𝙪𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙖 as territory. 1000 
𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨_𝙤𝙛_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮_𝙖𝙣𝙙_𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙚. Your polaker women are becoming low paid whores 
in america. Many proofs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615343

On 7/14/2023 6:45 PM, Natalio Frangopoulos wrote:
> JanPB wrote:
> 
>>> They just 𝙬𝙤𝙣_𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙩_𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙧𝙚_𝙛𝙪𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜_𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙤 around the globe.
>>
>> What koolaid are you drinking?
>>
>>> You 𝗳𝘂𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗿.
>>> Without Russia you wouldn't even exist. 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐚_𝐢𝐬_𝐚_𝐑𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐚𝐧_𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞,
>>> so talk correct Russianish. Fucking electricians.
>>
>> Russia is a failed state which will hopefully fall apart on its own into
> 
> your momma is a polaker whore. You stupid electrician. Dictating Russia
> what to do. You stinking sack of subhuman excrement. There will be peace
> and prosperity with 𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙧_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙚_𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠_𝙩𝙤_𝙍𝙪𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙖 as territory. 1000
> 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨_𝙤𝙛_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮_𝙖𝙣𝙙_𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙚. Your polaker women are becoming low paid whores
> in america. Many proofs.

What I want to know is what do you do with all that froth.

Do you actually swallow it? It is, after all, hazardous waste
not unlike the words you're spewing. Perhaps it is sought after
by the ruling class inhabiting the Kremlin. Nobody who was ever
there for more than an hour has had any taste.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615344

fool whodat evacuates:

>>> Russia is a failed state which will hopefully fall apart on its own
>>> into
>> 
>> your momma is a polaker whore. You stupid electrician. Dictating Russia
>> what to do. You stinking sack of subhuman excrement. There will be
>> peace and prosperity with 𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙧_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙚_𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠_𝙩𝙤_𝙍𝙪𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙖 as
>> territory. 1000 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨_𝙤𝙛_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮_𝙖𝙣𝙙_𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙚. Your polaker women are
>> becoming low paid whores in america. Many proofs.
> 
> What I want to know is what do you do with all that froth.

shut the fuck up, fool. 𝗜_𝗳𝘂𝗰𝗸_𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿_𝗮𝘀𝘀.

A Scott Ritter Investigation: 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁_𝗭𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗸𝘆 - Part 1
https://rumble.com/v2zs3r0-a-scott-ritter-investigation-agent-zelensky-part-1.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615346

On 7/14/2023 8:47 PM, Random Manos wrote:
> fool whodat evacuates:
> 
>>>> Russia is a failed state which will hopefully fall apart on its own
>>>> into
>>>
>>> your momma is a polaker whore. You stupid electrician. Dictating Russia
>>> what to do. You stinking sack of subhuman excrement. There will be
>>> peace and prosperity with 𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙧_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙚_𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠_𝙩𝙤_𝙍𝙪𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙖 as
>>> territory. 1000 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨_𝙤𝙛_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮_𝙖𝙣𝙙_𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙚. Your polaker women are
>>> becoming low paid whores in america. Many proofs.
>>
>> What I want to know is what do you do with all that froth.
> 
> shut the fuck up, fool. 𝗜_𝗳𝘂𝗰𝗸_𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿_𝗮𝘀𝘀.

So are you finally admitting that you're gay?

Perhaps I was mistaken and that isn't froth. Are you wearing it
openly hopeful of getting more?

<...>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615349

dementia hit whodat evacuates:

>>>> your momma is a polaker whore. You stupid electrician. Dictating
>>>> Russia what to do. You stinking sack of subhuman excrement. There
>>>> will be peace and prosperity with 𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙧_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙚_𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠_𝙩𝙤_𝙍𝙪𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙖
>>>> as territory. 1000 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨_𝙤𝙛_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮_𝙖𝙣𝙙_𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙚. Your polaker women
>>>> are becoming low paid whores in america. Many proofs.
>>>
>>> What I want to know is what do you do with all that froth.
>> 
>> shut the fuck up, fool. 𝗜_𝗳𝘂𝗰𝗸_𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿_𝗮𝘀𝘀.
> 
> So are you finally admitting that you're gay?

no. You are just good looking.

A Scott Ritter Investigation: 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁_𝗭𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗸𝘆 - Part 1
https://rumble.com/v2zs3r0-a-scott-ritter-investigation-agent-zelensky-part-1.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615350

On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 4:45:24 PM UTC-7, Natalio Frangopoulos wrote:
> JanPB wrote: 
> 
> >> They just 𝙬𝙤𝙣_𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙩_𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙧𝙚_𝙛𝙪𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜_𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙤 around the globe. 
> > 
> > What koolaid are you drinking? 
> > 
> >> You 𝗳𝘂𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗿. 
> >> Without Russia you wouldn't even exist. 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐚_𝐢𝐬_𝐚_𝐑𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐚𝐧_𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞, 
> >> so talk correct Russianish. Fucking electricians. 
> > 
> > Russia is a failed state which will hopefully fall apart on its own into
> your momma is a polaker whore. You stupid electrician. Dictating Russia 
> what to do. 

I don't need to dictate anything. Putin will accomplish all of the above all
by himself. He can even keep his A. Lange & Söhne wristwatch (I prefer
Grand Seiko Spring Drive).

> You stinking sack of subhuman excrement. 

Almost as good as Fawlty Towers!

> There will be peace 
> and prosperity with 𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙧_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙚_𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠_𝙩𝙤_𝙍𝙪𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙖 as territory. 1000 
> 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨_𝙤𝙛_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮_𝙖𝙣𝙙_𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙚. Your polaker women are becoming low paid whores 
> in america. Many proofs.

It's a possibility. But Russia cannot continue in its current modus operandi.
This era is *finished*.

--
Jan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615403

JanPB wrote:

> 
>> There will be peace and prosperity with
>> 𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙖𝙠𝙚𝙧_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙫𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙚_𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠_𝙩𝙤_𝙍𝙪𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙖 as territory. 1000
>> 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨_𝙤𝙛_𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙮_𝙖𝙣𝙙_𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙚. Your polaker women are becoming low paid
>> whores in america. Many proofs.
> 
> It's a possibility. But Russia cannot continue in its current modus
> operandi. This era is *finished*.

what are you doing both in nazi nato and EU, then. Polakers and polakia 
alone is a shithole on the face of the earth. But you are right, the 
putina is a fucking traitor. A real head of state would been erasing nazi 
polakia from the map of europe long ago, already. Your luck is in putin, 
which is not evil enough.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615321

On 7/14/2023 5:48 AM, Pascal Karameros wrote:
> JanPB wrote:
> 
>>>
>>> *_Russia_mulls_plan_to_display_destroyed_NATO_hardware_outside_embassies_*
>>>>
>>>> Russia is a failed state.
>>>
>>> *_Federation_*, not "state".
>>
>> I'll take a̶ f̶a̶i̶l̶e̶d̶ f̶e̶d̶e̶r̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ then.
> 
> They just 𝙬𝙤𝙣_𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙩_𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙧𝙚_𝙛𝙪𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜_𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙤 around the globe.

(oh look, the nymshifter script kiddies found another text manipulation 
program for its replies)

NATO isn't even fighting 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐, how could the failed 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 
federation have "won" against NATO?

Here's how to tell if 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐 fought against NATO:

Has the rest of Black Sea Fleet joined the Moskva yet?
Has the entire Baltic Sea Fleet joined the Moskva?
Have all 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 military facilities in Ukraine been wiped out?
Are Poland and Finland competing against each other as to who reaches 
Moscow first?

If the answers are all "no", 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐 hasn't fought against NATO yet.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615335

Volney wrote:

>>>> *_Federation_*, not "state".
>>>
>>> I'll take a̶ f̶a̶i̶l̶e̶d̶ f̶e̶d̶e̶r̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ then.
>> 
>> They just 𝙬𝙤𝙣_𝙖𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙩_𝙩𝙝𝙚_𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙧𝙚_𝙛𝙪𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜_𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙤 around the globe.
> 
> (oh look, the nymshifter script kiddies found another text manipulation
> program for its replies)

"found"?? you fucking electrician. He does the stuff he needs. You know 
nothing about physics.

> NATO isn't even fighting 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐, how could the failed 卐Ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐
> federation have "won" against NATO?

nato isn't fighting?? that's why they run away like dogs now, with tanks 
and shit from everywhere. What a shame. The sucked the biggest dick on the 
face of the earth, ever. A single country to beat the entire fucking nazi 
nato. GO Russia, go go go.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#615288

On July 12, JanPB wrote:
> Russia is a failed state. 

Perhaps.

But they have demonstrated a talent for nucular weapons.  
Which is the big problem.  Without such devices, the 
current melee could be ignored as a neighborhood squabble.

--
Rich

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614985

Le 10/07/2023 à 19:42, Richard Hachel a écrit :
> Doctor Hachel proposed new concepts concerning the theory of relativity, and new 
> equations.
> We then find ourselves, face to face, with two slightly different theories, 
> where things are not explained in the same way.
> On many points, the equations are the same.
> But not on others...
> I would like your opinion on this one:
> An object moves in the terrestrial reference frame, at a relativistic speed v. 
> The direction of the object makes an angle µ with the line of sight.
> 
> An electromagnetic wave is emitted E=hv.
> 
> According to Dr. Hachel, the perceived electromagnetic frequency will be 
> relative, and the equation giving the correspondence between the original 
> frequency and the perceived frequency would be this:
> hv'=hv.sqrt(1-v²/c²)/(1+cosµ.v/c)
> 
> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?rqLL7yCDU9buvOhF2G5m-CdDoUw@jntp/Data.Media:1>
> 
> Is this equation correct?
> 
> Can it be used in a possible relativistic physics exam?
> 
> Thank you for your answers.
> 
> R.H. 

Is this equation correct?

[ ] No. It's no correct
[ ] Yes. Equation is correct. 

R.H. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614987

Le 11/07/2023 à 13:24, Richard Hachel a écrit :

>> Doctor Hachel proposed new concepts concerning the theory of relativity, and new 
>> equations.
>> We then find ourselves, face to face, with two slightly different theories, 
>> where things are not explained in the same way.
>> On many points, the equations are the same.
>> But not on others...
>> I would like your opinion on this one:
>> An object moves in the terrestrial reference frame, at a relativistic speed v. 
>> The direction of the object makes an angle µ with the line of sight.
>> 
>> An electromagnetic wave is emitted E=hv.
>> 
>> According to Dr. Hachel, the perceived electromagnetic frequency will be 
>> relative, and the equation giving the correspondence between the original frequency 
>> and the perceived frequency would be this:
>> hv'=hv.sqrt(1-v²/c²)/(1+cosµ.v/c)
>> 
>> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?rqLL7yCDU9buvOhF2G5m-CdDoUw@jntp/Data.Media:1>
>> 
>> Is this equation correct?
>> 
>> Can it be used in a possible relativistic physics exam?
>> 
>> Thank you for your answers.
>> 
>> R.H. 
> 
> Is this equation correct?
> 
> [ ] No. It's no correct
> [ ] Yes. Equation is correct. 
> 
> R.H. 

J'en profite pour poser cette question ici, n'étant pas sûr d'avoir 
forcément des réponses sur le forum anglosaxon, malgré la tactique du 
baby steps (pour éviter de terroriser les lecteurs avec des question 
compliquées portant sur l'horizon des trous noirs spinofurtifs en milieu 
dispersif multichromatique heisenberguien).  

La question, traduite en français:

Un objet (ici le petit trait rouge) se déplace à vitesse v en croisant 
ma ligne de visée selon un angle µ.

Il m'envoie une onde électromagnétique d'énergie hv et de fréquence v. 


Quelle sera, pour moi la fréquence reçue?

L'équation que j'ai formulée est-elle bonne? 

R.H. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614988

Richard Hachel wrote:

>> Is this equation correct?
>> Can it be used in a possible relativistic physics exam?
>> Thank you for your answers. R.H.
> Is this equation correct?
> [ ] No. It's no correct [ ] Yes. Equation is correct.

not true, the fucking khazar goy actor on cocaine, said "president" 
zelenske, gives a fuck on "ukraine", which is 87% Russian Christian.

the khazar goy eating pigs, just want to steal another country, where the 
people has to be poor.

or you misunderstood the subject. Terribly misunderstood the subject. They 
pay him, he does job.

*_West_blamed_for_Ukraine's_counteroffensive_shortfall_* 
https://%72t.com/ru%73%73ia/579532-ukraine-munitions-eu-supplies/

these nazi khazars goys are admittedly in nato, 
*_more_than_anybody_else_*. The Bulgarians, Romanians and Hungarians, for 
instance, would receive from nazi nato, *_not_even_a_half_of_* what the 
fucking "ukraine" already received.

This is one contributing fact....But the Real truth is thousands of tonnes 
of ammunition and shells were sent...*_more_than_80%_Destroyed_* by Russia 
before it reach the Front line...collective West never in their strategy 
factored that in. 
*_Russia_depleted_all_combined_natowest_munition_*...leaving the western 
alliance fearful of their own stock piles...

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web