Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #614404 > unrolled thread

If relativity was easy to understand

Started bywhodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
First post2023-07-03 16:41 -0500
Last post2023-07-14 12:49 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 113 — 27 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  If relativity was easy to understand whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-03 16:41 -0500
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-03 14:48 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-03 18:10 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-03 20:11 -0500
        Re: If relativity was easy to understand patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-03 18:22 -0700
          Re: If relativity was easy to understand patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-03 18:38 -0700
          Re: If relativity was easy to understand whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-03 22:10 -0500
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-03 23:54 -0700
              Re: If relativity was easy to understand Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 07:05 -0700
                Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 07:38 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand Richard Hachel <r.hachel@alphapou.net> - 2023-07-04 14:30 +0000
        Re: If relativity was easy to understand Dominique Antonopoulos <oino@pueisese.uo> - 2023-07-04 15:27 +0000
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 14:51 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 14:56 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-03 19:41 -0500
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-03 17:53 -0400
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 14:57 -0700
        Re: If relativity was easy to understand Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 16:59 -0700
          Re: If relativity was easy to understand patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-03 18:44 -0700
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 19:59 -0700
              Re: If relativity was easy to understand Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 20:06 -0700
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 20:03 -0700
              Re: If relativity was easy to understand Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 20:07 -0700
                Re: If relativity was easy to understand Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 20:58 -0700
                Re: If relativity was easy to understand Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-04 00:42 -0400
                  Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 22:08 -0700
                Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 22:09 -0700
              Re: If relativity was easy to understand patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-05 09:16 -0700
          Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 22:07 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy Baldomero Pefanis <emls@rilaffne.lo> - 2023-07-03 22:39 +0000
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-07 08:05 +0200
        Re: If relativity was easy to understand Bubba Konstantatos <bosb@sbbtotab.ts> - 2023-07-07 11:30 +0000
        Re: If relativity was easy to understand Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-08 07:23 +0200
          Re: If relativity was easy to understand Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-08 10:30 -0400
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:21 -0700
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand Cash Adamidis <sida@sshsicih.ac> - 2023-07-08 22:52 +0000
              Re: If relativity was easy to understand Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 17:11 -0700
                Re: If relativity was easy to understand Mikell Michalaras <ella@llrilkhe.ah> - 2023-07-09 11:28 +0000
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-09 08:17 +0200
              Re: If relativity was easy to understand Michael Eatros <rore@aiaeieee.lt> - 2023-07-09 11:53 +0000
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 23:42 -0700
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Richard Hachel <r.hachel@alphapou.net> - 2023-07-04 14:26 +0000
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-04 09:34 -0700
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-04 09:56 -0700
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-04 13:22 -0700
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-04 15:04 -0700
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-04 16:13 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-04 18:46 -0500
        Re: If relativity was easy to understand Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-04 16:53 -0700
          Re: If relativity was easy to understand whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-04 18:57 -0500
          Re: If relativity was easy to understand Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 17:04 -0700
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-04 17:11 -0700
              Re: If relativity was easy to understand Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 19:21 -0700
                Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 21:57 -0700
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-04 17:12 -0700
              Re: If relativity was easy to understand whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-04 21:06 -0500
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 18:15 -0700
              Re: If relativity was easy to understand Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 19:21 -0700
              Re: If relativity was easy Johnthan Totolos <aoto@holashno.on> - 2023-07-05 17:32 +0000
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-04 20:38 -0700
              Re: If relativity was easy to understand Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 22:31 -0700
                Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 22:52 -0700
                Re: If relativity was easy to understand patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-05 01:25 -0700
                  Re: If relativity was easy to understand Richard Hachel <r.hachel@alphapou.net> - 2023-07-05 13:27 +0000
                    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-05 15:49 +0200
                      Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 09:14 -0700
                  Re: If relativity was easy to understand Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-05 09:33 -0400
                    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 17:35 +0200
                      Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 09:34 -0700
                        Re: If relativity was easy Stefhen Antonopoulos <slsn@spoolneo.eu> - 2023-07-05 17:46 +0000
                    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 09:16 -0700
                    Re: If relativity was easy to understand patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-05 09:26 -0700
                    Re: If relativity was easy Delma Haritopoulos <popp@ralroomo.lo> - 2023-07-05 17:14 +0000
                  Re: If relativity was easy to understand Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 17:41 +0200
                    Re: If relativity was easy to understand whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-05 14:21 -0500
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-04 21:55 -0700
              Re: If relativity was easy to understand Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 09:36 +0200
                Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 00:58 -0700
        Re: If relativity was easy to understand "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 15:12 -0700
          Re: If relativity was easy to understand Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-11 15:41 -0700
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 16:13 -0700
              Re: If relativity was easy to understand Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-11 16:36 -0700
                Re: If relativity was easy to understand "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 16:38 -0700
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-11 18:44 -0500
          Re: If relativity was easy to understand Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-07-11 22:35 -0500
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 22:19 -0700
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 16:35 -0700
              Re: If relativity was easy to understand Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-07-13 13:46 -0500
                Re: If relativity was easy to understand RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-07-13 13:12 -0700
                Re: If relativity was easy to understand "erkd...@gmail.com" <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 23:49 -0700
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-04 16:41 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-04 18:52 -0500
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-05 10:47 +0200
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 01:57 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-05 03:27 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-07-05 14:44 -0700
        Re: If relativity was easy to understand nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-06 10:29 +0200
          Re: If relativity was easy to understand RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2023-07-07 10:47 -0700
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-07 22:12 +0200
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2023-07-05 15:49 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-05 15:59 -0700
        Re: If relativity was easy to understand Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 20:03 -0700
          Re: If relativity was easy to understand whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-06 00:56 -0500
            Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 22:58 -0700
          Re: If relativity was easy to understand patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-07-05 23:39 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-05 22:04 -0700
    Re: If relativity was easy to understand Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-13 16:51 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-13 19:38 -0500
        Re: If relativity was easy to understand Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 21:40 -0700
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-07-14 07:19 +0200
      Re: If relativity was easy to understand Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-07-14 11:27 +0000
        Re: If relativity was easy to understand Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-14 10:33 -0700
          Re: If relativity was easy to understand whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-14 12:49 -0500

Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →

#614427

FromRichard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com>
Date2023-07-03 20:06 -0700
Message-ID<a5e5c705-a1b3-4a78-b769-e49f232d7286n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614425
On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 11:59:53 PM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 6:44:19 PM UTC-7, patdolan wrote: 
> > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 4:59:15 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 2:57:35 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > You are an idiot who miss Bodkin, the King of Idiots. 
> 
> > > Bodkin has forgotten more physics than you will ever know... 
> 
> > Bodkin was a fool. But one of the wisest fool in Christendom (even though he was orthodox?). Bodkin was always ready and willing to be painted into corner. It usually took me less than a 1/2 pint of dialectic to do it.
> Bodkin has forgotten TWICE as much physics than you have ever known, Dolan... maybe 3x...

Your mantra about "forgotten vs. remembered" knows no limits, imbecile.

Just space it in time, so you don't appear as a fucking drooling retarded.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614426

FromRichard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com>
Date2023-07-03 20:03 -0700
Message-ID<2f2d9863-1534-4aae-a92f-473cf2c45502n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614422
On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 10:44:19 PM UTC-3, patdolan wrote:
> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 4:59:15 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 2:57:35 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> > 
> > > You are an idiot who miss Bodkin, the King of Idiots. 
> > Bodkin has forgotten more physics than you will ever know...
> Bodkin was a fool. But one of the wisest fool in Christendom (even though he was orthodox?). Bodkin was always ready and willing to be painted into corner. It usually took me less than a 1/2 pint of dialectic to do it.

Much more orthodox than Moses Horowitz (Moe), the leader of the Three Stooges.

Only that he cut his curls and got his Beatles' like hair signature because he suffered heavy racist bullying in school.

Book: "I Stooged to Conquer The Autobiography of the Leader of the Three Stooges"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614428

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2023-07-03 20:07 -0700
Message-ID<92b5401c-f7a1-4159-ab34-5ae0132b15b0n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614426
On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 8:03:56 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 10:44:19 PM UTC-3, patdolan wrote: 
> > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 4:59:15 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 2:57:35 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > You are an idiot who miss Bodkin, the King of Idiots. 

> > > Bodkin has forgotten more physics than you will ever know... 

> > Bodkin was a fool. But one of the wisest fool in Christendom (even though he was orthodox?). Bodkin was always ready and willing to be painted into corner. It usually took me less than a 1/2 pint of dialectic to do it.

> Much more orthodox than Moses Horowitz (Moe), the leader of the Three Stooges. 
> 
> Only that he cut his curls and got his Beatles' like hair signature because he suffered heavy racist bullying in school. 
> 
> Book: "I Stooged to Conquer The Autobiography of the Leader of the Three Stooges"

As always, you just make it up as you go along, completely oblivious to your ignorance...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614432

FromRichard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com>
Date2023-07-03 20:58 -0700
Message-ID<c25c161f-35fd-4fa7-b71f-cedb881b1cccn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614428
On Tuesday, July 4, 2023 at 12:07:40 AM UTC-3, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 8:03:56 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 10:44:19 PM UTC-3, patdolan wrote: 
> > > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 4:59:15 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > > > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 2:57:35 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> > > > 
> > > > > You are an idiot who miss Bodkin, the King of Idiots. 
> 
> > > > Bodkin has forgotten more physics than you will ever know... 
> 
> > > Bodkin was a fool. But one of the wisest fool in Christendom (even though he was orthodox?). Bodkin was always ready and willing to be painted into corner. It usually took me less than a 1/2 pint of dialectic to do it. 
> 
> > Much more orthodox than Moses Horowitz (Moe), the leader of the Three Stooges. 
> > 
> > Only that he cut his curls and got his Beatles' like hair signature because he suffered heavy racist bullying in school. 
> > 
> > Book: "I Stooged to Conquer The Autobiography of the Leader of the Three Stooges"
> As always, you just make it up as you go along, completely oblivious to your ignorance...


I stooged to conquer : the autobiography of the leader of The three stooges
by Howard, Moe 

https://archive.org/details/istoogedtoconque0000howa/mode/2up

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614433

FromVolney <volney@invalid.invalid>
Date2023-07-04 00:42 -0400
Message-ID<u8080i$8vt$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#614428
On 7/3/2023 11:07 PM, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 8:03:56 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
>> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 10:44:19 PM UTC-3, patdolan wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 4:59:15 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
>>>> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 2:57:35 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You are an idiot who miss Bodkin, the King of Idiots.
> 
>>>> Bodkin has forgotten more physics than you will ever know...
> 
>>> Bodkin was a fool. But one of the wisest fool in Christendom (even though he was orthodox?). Bodkin was always ready and willing to be painted into corner. It usually took me less than a 1/2 pint of dialectic to do it.
> 
>> Much more orthodox than Moses Horowitz (Moe), the leader of the Three Stooges.
>>
>> Only that he cut his curls and got his Beatles' like hair signature because he suffered heavy racist bullying in school.
>>
>> Book: "I Stooged to Conquer The Autobiography of the Leader of the Three Stooges"
> 
> As always, you just make it up as you go along, completely oblivious to your ignorance...

I did read something similar once. But now that Dick Hurts says it's 
true, I'm less likely to believe it.

But it certainly is true Bodkin has forgotten twice as much more physics 
than Dolan will ever know. Same goes for Dick.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614436

FromMaciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com>
Date2023-07-03 22:08 -0700
Message-ID<be80b3cd-a986-44f9-8393-66df74ed92e5n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614433
On Tuesday, 4 July 2023 at 06:43:01 UTC+2, Volney wrote:
> On 7/3/2023 11:07 PM, Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 8:03:56 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> >> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 10:44:19 PM UTC-3, patdolan wrote: 
> >>> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 4:59:15 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: 
> >>>> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 2:57:35 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> You are an idiot who miss Bodkin, the King of Idiots. 
> > 
> >>>> Bodkin has forgotten more physics than you will ever know... 
> > 
> >>> Bodkin was a fool. But one of the wisest fool in Christendom (even though he was orthodox?). Bodkin was always ready and willing to be painted into corner. It usually took me less than a 1/2 pint of dialectic to do it. 
> > 
> >> Much more orthodox than Moses Horowitz (Moe), the leader of the Three Stooges. 
> >> 
> >> Only that he cut his curls and got his Beatles' like hair signature because he suffered heavy racist bullying in school. 
> >> 
> >> Book: "I Stooged to Conquer The Autobiography of the Leader of the Three Stooges" 
> > 
> > As always, you just make it up as you go along, completely oblivious to your ignorance...
> I did read something similar once. But now that Dick Hurts says it's 
> true, I'm less likely to believe it. 

And do you still believe tghat adjusting clocks to
your  9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy means putting
them into some "Newton mode", stupid Mike?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614437

FromMaciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com>
Date2023-07-03 22:09 -0700
Message-ID<24ca781f-ec7f-4820-a92b-eb0d6631c03cn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614428
On Tuesday, 4 July 2023 at 05:07:40 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 8:03:56 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 10:44:19 PM UTC-3, patdolan wrote: 
> > > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 4:59:15 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > > > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 2:57:35 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> > > > 
> > > > > You are an idiot who miss Bodkin, the King of Idiots. 
> 
> > > > Bodkin has forgotten more physics than you will ever know... 
> 
> > > Bodkin was a fool. But one of the wisest fool in Christendom (even though he was orthodox?). Bodkin was always ready and willing to be painted into corner. It usually took me less than a 1/2 pint of dialectic to do it. 
> 
> > Much more orthodox than Moses Horowitz (Moe), the leader of the Three Stooges. 
> > 
> > Only that he cut his curls and got his Beatles' like hair signature because he suffered heavy racist bullying in school. 
> > 
> > Book: "I Stooged to Conquer The Autobiography of the Leader of the Three Stooges"
> As always, you just make it up as you go along, completely oblivious to your ignorance...

As always, you're waving arms and making wise faces.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614509

Frompatdolan <patdolan@comcast.net>
Date2023-07-05 09:16 -0700
Message-ID<6f3bed31-d06e-43e4-a6c8-72059c696b02n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614426
On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 8:03:56 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote:
> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 10:44:19 PM UTC-3, patdolan wrote: 
> > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 4:59:15 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > > On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 2:57:35 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > You are an idiot who miss Bodkin, the King of Idiots. 
> > > Bodkin has forgotten more physics than you will ever know... 
> > Bodkin was a fool. But one of the wisest fool in Christendom (even though he was orthodox?). Bodkin was always ready and willing to be painted into corner. It usually took me less than a 1/2 pint of dialectic to do it.
> Much more orthodox than Moses Horowitz (Moe), the leader of the Three Stooges. 
> 
> Only that he cut his curls and got his Beatles' like hair signature because he suffered heavy racist bullying in school. 
> 
> Book: "I Stooged to Conquer The Autobiography of the Leader of the Three Stooges"
Richard, thank you for bringing this book to my attention.  From my youth I have always held the Stooges in the highest regard.  Their corpus of work is a veritable font of filosophy from which one can draw much wisdom.  Our worthless Seattle Public Library system does retain this tome in its stacks.  I shall purchase a copy on Amazon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614435

FromMaciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com>
Date2023-07-03 22:07 -0700
Message-ID<9db97231-dfdb-4ada-a3b2-4c2f140cc4afn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614415
On Tuesday, 4 July 2023 at 01:59:15 UTC+2, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 2:57:35 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: 
> 
> > You are an idiot who miss Bodkin, the King of Idiots.
> Bodkin has forgotten more physics than you will ever know...

If he has forgotten some of your delusional
nonsenses - good for him.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614412 — Re: If relativity was easy

FromBaldomero Pefanis <emls@rilaffne.lo>
Date2023-07-03 22:39 +0000
SubjectRe: If relativity was easy
Message-ID<u7ving$1out8$1@paganini.bofh.team>
In reply to#614407
Volney wrote:

> On 7/3/2023 5:41 PM, whodat wrote:
>> 
>> If relativity was easy to understand we probably wouldn't have cranks.
> 
> Odd Bodkin once pointed out the reason we have so many relativity cranks
> is that relativity is (comparatively) easy to understand. We don't have
> that many QM/QED cranks other than relativity cranks which extend their

yes sure.

Narco-Fuhrer, khazar goy zelenske,
*_Admits_Russian_Strikes_Destroyed_SBU_Headquarters_* in Sumy
https://b%69%74%63hute.com/video/cuSYA5n9BhSy

yet another "opportunity" terrorist motherfucker. What the hell is wrong 
with you, fucking gringos.
*_Ukraine_conflict_is_a_once_in_a_generation_opportunity_* - CIA
https://b%69%74%63hute.com/video/f6O6a7shMuwj


Chechen Commander Feels Sorry For Ukrainian CannonFodder Who Will Fight To
The Last Man https://b%69%74%63hute.com/video/0QpdktSBX4ht

*_Joe_Bidens_itchy_mask_shows_the_truth_*, hes a fake
https://b%69%74%63hute.com/video/pgt58X4rGftb

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614607

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2023-07-07 08:05 +0200
Message-ID<kgpo7sFm6l3U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#614407
Am 03.07.2023 um 23:53 schrieb Volney:
> On 7/3/2023 5:41 PM, whodat wrote:
>>
>> If relativity was easy to understand we probably wouldn't have cranks.
>
> Odd Bodkin once pointed out the reason we have so many relativity cranks
> is that relativity is (comparatively) easy to understand. We don't have
> that many QM/QED cranks other than relativity cranks which extend their
> crankiness to QM. Cranks see the math of w=(u+v)/(1+uv/c^2) as
> understandable but it (and light always moving at c) conflicts with the
> "obvious" w=u+v so it "must" be wrong.

After spending roughly three years on analyzing Einstein's 'On the 
electrodynamics of moving bodies', I have decided, that Einstein's text 
was intentionally made to distract physicists from true science.

Technically Einstein (or whoever else wrote it) used the works of (at 
least) Poincare and Heinrich Hertz and created a piece of crap.

The author was deified and the criticism ot that particular paper was 
punished.

So, in the end, generations of physicists were put on the wrong track.

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614625

FromBubba Konstantatos <bosb@sbbtotab.ts>
Date2023-07-07 11:30 +0000
Message-ID<u88t0a$3ajp5$3@paganini.bofh.team>
In reply to#614607
Thomas Heger wrote:

> Am 03.07.2023 um 23:53 schrieb Volney:
>> On 7/3/2023 5:41 PM, whodat wrote:
>>> If relativity was easy to understand we probably wouldn't have cranks.
>> Odd Bodkin once pointed out the reason we have so many relativity
>> cranks is that relativity is (comparatively) easy to understand. We
>> don't have that many QM/QED cranks other than relativity cranks which
> 
> After spending roughly three years on analyzing Einstein's 'On the
> electrodynamics of moving bodies', I have decided, that Einstein's text
> was intentionally made to distract physicists from true science.

This is a stupid article by a stupid source, Zelensky is obviously a 
puppet of NATO/USA, so *_it's_them_dragging_Earth_to_destruction_* very 
soon.

go tell your corrupt lying government to suck my dick. Tell them I sent 
you to say that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614747

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2023-07-08 07:23 +0200
Message-ID<kgsa4nF4862U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#614607
Am 07.07.2023 um 08:05 schrieb Thomas Heger:
> Am 03.07.2023 um 23:53 schrieb Volney:
>> On 7/3/2023 5:41 PM, whodat wrote:
>>>
>>> If relativity was easy to understand we probably wouldn't have cranks.
>>
>> Odd Bodkin once pointed out the reason we have so many relativity cranks
>> is that relativity is (comparatively) easy to understand. We don't have
>> that many QM/QED cranks other than relativity cranks which extend their
>> crankiness to QM. Cranks see the math of w=(u+v)/(1+uv/c^2) as
>> understandable but it (and light always moving at c) conflicts with the
>> "obvious" w=u+v so it "must" be wrong.
>
> After spending roughly three years on analyzing Einstein's 'On the
> electrodynamics of moving bodies', I have decided, that Einstein's text
> was intentionally made to distract physicists from true science.
>
> Technically Einstein (or whoever else wrote it) used the works of (at
> least) Poincare and Heinrich Hertz and created a piece of crap.
>

See here

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D2m4RV7StviWik2JiB1_Huk_7PR5Sxvi/view?usp=sharing 


This is not really my last version, but the last one that I have put online.

It is called 'annotated version of SRT' and lists a HUGE number of 
various errors in Einstein's text 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'.

So, how could this be?


Was Planck stupid? Definetily not!!


So, how in the world was such a collosal number of errors possible?


Well, you need to read the works of Heinrich Hertz and Henry Poincare to 
see, from where Einstein's paper was actually derived.

As I can't speak French, I have sofar only read papers of Hertz.

But his papers are by orders of magnitude better written and cover 
roughly the same topics.

Even the titel 'Zu Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper' seems to be derived 
from a titel of Hertz 'Grundgleichungen zur Elektrodynmik bewegter Körper'.

So, how did that happen???

My only idea sofar: this was intentional and meant to derail physics by 
means of crap and propaganda.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614760

FromVolney <volney@invalid.invalid>
Date2023-07-08 10:30 -0400
Message-ID<u8bruk$1p0c2$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#614747
On 7/8/2023 1:23 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 07.07.2023 um 08:05 schrieb Thomas Heger:
>> Am 03.07.2023 um 23:53 schrieb Volney:
>>> On 7/3/2023 5:41 PM, whodat wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If relativity was easy to understand we probably wouldn't have cranks.
>>>
>>> Odd Bodkin once pointed out the reason we have so many relativity cranks
>>> is that relativity is (comparatively) easy to understand. We don't have
>>> that many QM/QED cranks other than relativity cranks which extend their
>>> crankiness to QM. Cranks see the math of w=(u+v)/(1+uv/c^2) as
>>> understandable but it (and light always moving at c) conflicts with the
>>> "obvious" w=u+v so it "must" be wrong.
>>
>> After spending roughly three years on analyzing Einstein's 'On the
>> electrodynamics of moving bodies', I have decided, that Einstein's text
>> was intentionally made to distract physicists from true science.
>>
>> Technically Einstein (or whoever else wrote it) used the works of (at
>> least) Poincare and Heinrich Hertz and created a piece of crap.
>>
> 
> See here
> 
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D2m4RV7StviWik2JiB1_Huk_7PR5Sxvi/view?usp=sharing
> 
> This is not really my last version, but the last one that I have put 
> online.
> 
> It is called 'annotated version of SRT' and lists a HUGE number of 
> various errors in Einstein's text 'On the electrodynamics of moving 
> bodies'.
> 
> So, how could this be?

Because you are unable to learn anything? Of all the "errors" anyone has 
bothered to look at, every single one was shot down in flames, as either 
your error or misunderstanding, or not wrong at all.
> 
> 
> Was Planck stupid? Definetily not!!

Did you consider that perhaps you are?
> 
> 
> So, how in the world was such a collosal number of errors possible?

I don't know, apparently you are just very good at making errors.

> 
> My only idea sofar: this was intentional and meant to derail physics by 
> means of crap and propaganda.

I know many cranks want to derail physics here, but it's not going to 
happen.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614765

FromMaciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com>
Date2023-07-08 10:21 -0700
Message-ID<450c867f-c418-456a-afd8-a915fa5ad5b5n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614760
On Saturday, 8 July 2023 at 16:30:48 UTC+2, Volney wrote:
> On 7/8/2023 1:23 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: 
> > Am 07.07.2023 um 08:05 schrieb Thomas Heger: 
> >> Am 03.07.2023 um 23:53 schrieb Volney: 
> >>> On 7/3/2023 5:41 PM, whodat wrote: 
> >>>> 
> >>>> If relativity was easy to understand we probably wouldn't have cranks. 
> >>> 
> >>> Odd Bodkin once pointed out the reason we have so many relativity cranks 
> >>> is that relativity is (comparatively) easy to understand. We don't have 
> >>> that many QM/QED cranks other than relativity cranks which extend their 
> >>> crankiness to QM. Cranks see the math of w=(u+v)/(1+uv/c^2) as 
> >>> understandable but it (and light always moving at c) conflicts with the 
> >>> "obvious" w=u+v so it "must" be wrong. 
> >> 
> >> After spending roughly three years on analyzing Einstein's 'On the 
> >> electrodynamics of moving bodies', I have decided, that Einstein's text 
> >> was intentionally made to distract physicists from true science. 
> >> 
> >> Technically Einstein (or whoever else wrote it) used the works of (at 
> >> least) Poincare and Heinrich Hertz and created a piece of crap. 
> >> 
> > 
> > See here 
> > 
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D2m4RV7StviWik2JiB1_Huk_7PR5Sxvi/view?usp=sharing 
> > 
> > This is not really my last version, but the last one that I have put 
> > online. 
> > 
> > It is called 'annotated version of SRT' and lists a HUGE number of 
> > various errors in Einstein's text 'On the electrodynamics of moving 
> > bodies'. 
> > 
> > So, how could this be?
> Because you are unable to learn anything? Of all the "errors" anyone has 

And do you still believe that  9 192 631 770  ISO idiocy
is some "Newton mode"? You're such an amazing idiot, 
stupid Mike, even considering the standards of your
moronic religion.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614806

FromCash Adamidis <sida@sshsicih.ac>
Date2023-07-08 22:52 +0000
Message-ID<u8cpbp$3rtkl$3@paganini.bofh.team>
In reply to#614760
Volney wrote:

> On 7/8/2023 1:23 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>> It is called 'annotated version of SRT' and lists a HUGE number of
>> various errors in Einstein's text 'On the electrodynamics of moving
>> bodies'. So, how could this be?
> 
> Because you are unable to learn anything? Of all the "errors" anyone has
> bothered to look at, every single one was shot down in flames, as either
> your error or misunderstanding, or not wrong at all.

you need a proof. Here is another proof.

*_Prigozhin_a_wanker_wannabe_Businessman_*, a parasite, not Military 
Commander https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/ZS0UYo3TZHAl

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614811

FromPaul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com>
Date2023-07-08 17:11 -0700
Message-ID<f9bfb854-effe-4fd9-8371-18f8b83c81a5n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#614806
On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 3:52:44 PM UTC-7, Cash Adamidis wrote:
> Volney wrote: 
> 
> > On 7/8/2023 1:23 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: 
> >> It is called 'annotated version of SRT' and lists a HUGE number of 
> >> various errors in Einstein's text 'On the electrodynamics of moving 
> >> bodies'. So, how could this be? 
> > 
> > Because you are unable to learn anything? Of all the "errors" anyone has 
> > bothered to look at, every single one was shot down in flames, as either 
> > your error or misunderstanding, or not wrong at all.
> you need a proof. Here is another proof. 
> 
> *_Prigozhin_a_wanker_wannabe_Businessman_*, a parasite, not Military 
> Commander https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/ZS0UYo3TZHAl

As always, NONE of your links ever work... time to give up and move along...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614831

FromMikell Michalaras <ella@llrilkhe.ah>
Date2023-07-09 11:28 +0000
Message-ID<u8e5k8$5qh8$1@paganini.bofh.team>
In reply to#614811
Paul Alsing wrote:

> On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 3:52:44 PM UTC-7, Cash Adamidis wrote:
>> Volney wrote:
>> > Because you are unable to learn anything? Of all the "errors" anyone
>> > has bothered to look at, every single one was shot down in flames, as
>> > either your error or misunderstanding, or not wrong at all.
>> you need a proof. Here is another proof.
>> 
>> *_Prigozhin_a_wanker_wannabe_Businessman_*, a parasite, not Military
>> Commander https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/ZS0UYo3TZHAl
> 
> As always, NONE of your links ever work... time to give up and move
> along...

that's just because you don't use your brain, you fucking retard. Your 
capitalist "democratic" internet provider is blocking the site, most 
likely through the DNS. Change your fucking DNS with a one from a 
*_really_free_country_*, idiot. Likely also, a DOH (DNS over https) server 
enabled to something else.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614819

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2023-07-09 08:17 +0200
Message-ID<kgv1miFhgrlU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#614760
Am 08.07.2023 um 16:30 schrieb Volney:
> On 7/8/2023 1:23 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>> Am 07.07.2023 um 08:05 schrieb Thomas Heger:
>>> Am 03.07.2023 um 23:53 schrieb Volney:
>>>> On 7/3/2023 5:41 PM, whodat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If relativity was easy to understand we probably wouldn't have cranks.
>>>>
>>>> Odd Bodkin once pointed out the reason we have so many relativity
>>>> cranks
>>>> is that relativity is (comparatively) easy to understand. We don't have
>>>> that many QM/QED cranks other than relativity cranks which extend their
>>>> crankiness to QM. Cranks see the math of w=(u+v)/(1+uv/c^2) as
>>>> understandable but it (and light always moving at c) conflicts with the
>>>> "obvious" w=u+v so it "must" be wrong.
>>>
>>> After spending roughly three years on analyzing Einstein's 'On the
>>> electrodynamics of moving bodies', I have decided, that Einstein's text
>>> was intentionally made to distract physicists from true science.
>>>
>>> Technically Einstein (or whoever else wrote it) used the works of (at
>>> least) Poincare and Heinrich Hertz and created a piece of crap.
>>>
>>
>> See here
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D2m4RV7StviWik2JiB1_Huk_7PR5Sxvi/view?usp=sharing
>>
>>
>> This is not really my last version, but the last one that I have put
>> online.
>>
>> It is called 'annotated version of SRT' and lists a HUGE number of
>> various errors in Einstein's text 'On the electrodynamics of moving
>> bodies'.
>>
>> So, how could this be?
>
> Because you are unable to learn anything? Of all the "errors" anyone has
> bothered to look at, every single one was shot down in flames, as either
> your error or misunderstanding, or not wrong at all.


Actually I can learn and do so all the time.

I have actually admitted, that my last version contained a number of my 
own errors. But I have already created a new version, which should be 
free of errors.

The number of Einstein's errors was reduced by this, but still remains 
enormous (about 420).

I have actually discussed many subtopics here on this board, paritally 
also with you.

I have invited you and everybody else to show, that there were errors 
made by me in my annotations.

In a few case you were succesfull and I have already changed the covered 
topics.

But more or less these changes were rather small in comparison to the 
overall picture of a paper, that is FULL of errors of all sorts.

So, what you plan to do with this?


Do You still insist on the status of Einstein as true genius in physics?



>>
>> Was Planck stupid? Definetily not!!
>
> Did you consider that perhaps you are?

Well, perhaps...

But I was not the author of 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#614833

FromMichael Eatros <rore@aiaeieee.lt>
Date2023-07-09 11:53 +0000
Message-ID<u8e737$5qh8$3@paganini.bofh.team>
In reply to#614819
Thomas Heger wrote:

> I have actually admitted, that my last version contained a number of my
> own errors. But I have already created a new version, which should be
> free of errors.

right after supplying *_the_forbidden_cluster_bombs_*, illegal in over 120 
countries, because the killing civilians, *_the_terrorist_* khazar goy 
america wants *_another_coup_detat_and_civil_war_* in India, because the 
*_human_rights_*. These khazar goys are evil like shit.

Human rights ? Whilst they are sending cluster bombs (Expired mind you) to 
the Ukraine, have set up over 100 L4 bioweapon labs around the world, 
force entire nations into sanction or crime induced poverty, and screw 
their very own citizens whilst they are at it ? Sheesh.. what delusional 
crack pots !

where were the poms yanks human rights when in 71 they were gonna blow 
india 🇮🇳 off the map thanks to russia who stopped them

Did they bring Cluster Bombs as gifts?

USA planning a regime change or colour revolution in India ? I wouldn't be 
surprised... according to history, they are planning coups in every 
country that is not subordinate/subjected to their rules.

*_US_delegation_brings_'human_rights_concerns'_to_India__*
https://rt.com/india/579420-top-us-human-rights-official/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web