Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #613164 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-06-17 21:32 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-09-07 16:51 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 317 — 40 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-17 21:32 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-18 10:44 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-18 10:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-18 11:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-18 13:10 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-18 15:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-06-19 09:31 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-19 07:45 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-19 07:51 -0700
Cranks Richard Hertz, Laurence Clark and Pat Dolan keep on slobbering "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-06-19 07:56 -0700
Re: Cranks Richard Hertz, Laurence Clark and Pat Dolan keep on slobbering Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-19 08:01 -0700
Re: Cranks Richard Hertz, Laurence Clark and Pat Dolan keep on slobbering "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-06-19 11:55 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-19 10:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-19 10:53 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-06-19 07:52 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 14:48 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 15:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 15:51 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 16:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-20 20:05 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 18:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 20:19 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 21:08 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 21:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-21 06:23 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-21 17:41 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-21 10:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-21 13:39 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-22 11:04 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-22 11:04 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-22 02:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-21 12:09 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-21 10:53 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-22 11:04 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-22 11:06 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-23 11:49 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 08:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-23 11:59 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 10:38 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-23 13:28 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Chaston Kuipers <rsoc@scusseee.ps> - 2023-06-23 21:42 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-24 10:46 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-24 10:46 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 08:05 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 08:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 09:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 10:30 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 10:54 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:04 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:28 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 13:44 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-25 13:48 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 11:48 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 07:22 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 10:15 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 11:06 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 11:31 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:45 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 22:53 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 14:58 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:23 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 08:44 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:17 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:22 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:22 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:26 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:39 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2023-06-20 18:33 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 15:31 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 19:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 07:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 16:47 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 08:51 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-23 13:13 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Epifanio Schoonenburg <urou@sucinora.br> - 2023-06-23 17:28 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 10:35 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Reginal Langbroek <gorl@gblarllb.ra> - 2023-06-23 17:40 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 10:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 12:01 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 12:58 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 13:02 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-23 21:28 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 15:49 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 16:35 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 17:55 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 16:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 16:46 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 09:51 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-27 10:55 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 12:50 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 13:58 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 12:32 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-27 21:55 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 13:41 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 23:30 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 21:14 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-28 13:23 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 07:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 10:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-28 23:31 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-28 15:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-29 12:48 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 06:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-29 11:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-09-08 12:47 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 04:36 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 06:12 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-09-08 16:11 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 08:46 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 20:28 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-09-09 11:28 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 21:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 21:57 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 22:52 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 20:28 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 23:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 20:28 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 15:36 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-29 12:48 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-29 12:08 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 13:31 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 13:23 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 16:44 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 15:23 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 19:40 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 19:12 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 23:37 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 16:19 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-30 19:52 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-30 20:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-30 22:47 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 09:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 13:07 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 13:39 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 13:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 15:57 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 14:00 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 18:02 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 15:04 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 18:08 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 16:17 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 19:35 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 16:18 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 16:40 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 19:40 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 20:14 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 21:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-02 00:46 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 22:13 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 07:27 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-02 12:07 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 09:34 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-02 19:06 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 10:09 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-03 01:47 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 20:57 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 11:13 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-02 13:33 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 12:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 12:57 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-02 23:17 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-03 11:27 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-02 01:26 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 11:12 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 13:04 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 13:53 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-02 01:15 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 19:39 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Smith Can <aanh@nnnttcth.ia> - 2023-07-01 22:10 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-01 13:26 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Hillary Oorschot <lara@aocolror.ya> - 2023-06-29 21:29 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 17:04 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Emanuele Heel <manl@eeeeleee.ll> - 2023-06-29 22:31 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-29 20:30 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 19:53 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 19:46 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's David Agteren <ainv@gvdideig.aa> - 2023-06-30 09:18 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-30 09:17 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Woodrow Richard <rwao@rwwrrooo.rw> - 2023-07-01 11:43 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Demonte Achthoven <oado@ennmoaea.ch> - 2023-06-28 16:42 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Braxton Amstel <txmt@asememtm.ra> - 2023-06-28 16:50 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Bob Rumpade <peab@orbmarer.ou> - 2023-06-28 23:04 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-28 13:23 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-06-28 15:09 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 17:47 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 18:46 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-28 20:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 21:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-29 12:48 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 05:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-28 21:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Lou <noelturntive@live.co.uk> - 2023-06-29 05:53 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 07:02 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-29 12:14 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 12:17 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 14:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 15:09 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 15:42 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 15:51 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 17:33 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 13:27 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 14:16 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-30 19:44 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-30 21:08 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 21:49 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-30 00:25 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's Peter-John Maes <a-he@t-jtrjsm.ee> - 2023-06-30 11:13 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-30 00:23 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-30 11:45 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 04:13 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-01 13:26 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 14:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 19:30 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 19:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:34 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:13 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Keaton Konstantatos <ktnn@tksatooa.ta> - 2023-07-07 19:16 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-08 11:40 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 02:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-08 10:23 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 13:20 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 13:19 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-10 13:28 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 13:39 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-10 18:45 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 17:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-10 20:52 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 19:17 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 19:26 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 19:36 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 11:58 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 03:30 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 06:40 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-12 15:02 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-12 18:14 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-12 16:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-12 21:30 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-07-12 19:08 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 19:29 -0700
Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 18:48 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 20:48 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 08:29 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 08:38 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 08:52 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 09:47 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-12 21:36 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-10 23:14 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 20:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Barton Demakis <erom@akadikmr.no> - 2023-07-11 09:24 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Pasquale Nomikos <osai@qoauqsqm.ka> - 2023-07-08 20:47 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-09 12:35 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 09:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:38 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:40 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:44 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 12:22 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:00 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:32 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:34 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:40 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 11:27 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 12:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 12:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 12:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:39 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:47 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 14:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 22:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:01 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 14:10 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:16 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:08 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-09 14:25 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 18:43 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 16:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 16:18 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Lee Kanavos <alke@avvvvekn.ll> - 2023-07-09 19:21 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 13:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 19:54 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 21:25 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 21:58 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-10 13:31 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 10:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Jeiker Paraskos <okas@ppkiesre.rr> - 2023-07-10 22:20 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 16:30 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-10 23:27 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Eugene Antimisiaris <anse@neanenae.ir> - 2023-07-11 09:07 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Wyouman Petrakis <iawp@eyapkrsk.or> - 2023-07-10 11:39 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 14:34 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 15:05 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-08 17:46 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:12 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Fraga Kalakos <akol@fgkkakar.gk> - 2023-07-09 15:11 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-08 19:00 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 17:06 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz refuses to concede, "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 06:16 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 08:57 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 09:05 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 11:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-18 13:05 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-18 13:09 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 16:44 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 16:56 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 18:43 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 19:30 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 19:46 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-18 20:37 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-18 21:30 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 14:06 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 16:20 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 16:54 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 16:51 -0700
Page 4 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 16 Next page →
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-26 22:53 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qcydk3.t61ubb1dtbe9sN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #613791 |
Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, June 26, 2023 at 2:47:38?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Einstein's theory of Special relativity is founded on an error made by > > > Hendrick Lorentz. > > So you cannot even spell a name correctly. > > It is -Hendrik- Antoon Lorentz. > > > > Ten points on the crackpot index for you, > > > > Jan > How do you tell who's telling the truth? > The ones trying to silence the others are lying. Quote miners, like you, never tell the truth. They quote mine for the purpose of lying, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-26 14:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <20d6fbe4-65f4-4955-b545-43e2b3b1f029n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613795 |
On Monday, June 26, 2023 at 1:53:27 PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Monday, June 26, 2023 at 2:47:38?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Einstein's theory of Special relativity is founded on an error made by > > > > Hendrick Lorentz. > > > So you cannot even spell a name correctly. > > > It is -Hendrik- Antoon Lorentz. > > > > > > Ten points on the crackpot index for you, > > > > > > Jan > > How do you tell who's telling the truth? > > The ones trying to silence the others are lying. > Quote miners, like you, never tell the truth. > They quote mine for the purpose of lying, > > Jan Dumb over-generalization. Once again, you're guilty of fallacious reasoning.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 11:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <425d0680-598f-462e-b5e2-08c38ea6c182n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613626 |
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 10:30:35 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > Why would the tiny discrepancy of 43"/century require a huge change in the velocity of gravity to correct and how would that avoid throwing everything off? > No relativist will answer you, because of: > > 1) Ignorance. > > 2) Sheer ignorance. > > 3) Fanaticism to defend their doctrine, in particular spacetime. > > 4) More ignorance, in particular about Solar System Dynamics. The mathematical formulae of relativity amount to no more than a wizard's cloak.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-24 11:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b152ecb0-4d9c-4f7d-8ca0-3d701f8422b1n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613626 |
On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 10:30:35 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:37:19 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:46:04 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > whodat <who...@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > >> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > > >>>> [-] > > > > >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > > > >>>>>> military-related. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> He had no security clearance. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > > > >>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > > > >>>>>> he didn't). > > > > >>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. > > > > >>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, > > > > >>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > > > > >>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > > > > >>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Jan > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > > > > >>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > > > > >>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > > > > >> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > > > > >> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > > > > >> > > > > >> Zero, Zilch, Nada, > > > > >> > > > > >> Jan > > > > > Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had > > > > > nothing to do with it either. > > > > > > > > > Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was > > > > involved in lots of technological research/development other than > > > > the relativity he was most famous for. > > > Sure. And I'll bet that Einstein was a much beter engineer > > > than any of those here present. > > > After all, he -was- an engineer by training. > > > > > > And being a patent examiner is one of the most demanding jobs > > > in the engineering profession. > > > You need to be able to understand the workings > > > of a very broad range of devices, in technical detail. > > > > > > According to his boss at the office in Bern > > > he was the best patent examiner they ever had, > > > > > > Jan > > Why would the tiny discrepancy of 43"/century require a huge change in the velocity of gravity to correct and how would that avoid throwing everything off? > No relativist will answer you, because of: > > 1) Ignorance. > > 2) Sheer ignorance. > > 3) Fanaticism to defend their doctrine, in particular spacetime. > > 4) More ignorance, in particular about Solar System Dynamics. "all the essential traits of the theory can be made clear without the aid of mathematics" - Thirring "The Ideas of Einstein's Theory" p. v. If so, why can't we be told why the speed of light is invoked in the calculations?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 08:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <488015fb-3784-4ad5-83f8-07485d909d66n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613521 |
On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > [-] > > > > > Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > > > > military-related. > > > > > > > > > > He had no security clearance. > > > > > > > > > > The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > > > > have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > > > > he didn't). > > > > Thank you for the interesting facts. > > > I find it somewhat surprising that you, > > > given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > > > didn't discover the facts on your own. > > > > > > The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > > > and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > > > Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > > Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > > Zero, Zilch, Nada, > > Jan Except he approved of it and signed a petition to the president for it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-21 11:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e4fd681f-6194-45db-b747-6de6cc1ce79cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613376 |
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 1:09:30 PM UTC-3, Volney wrote: <snip> > Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything military-related. > > He had no security clearance. > > The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would have been approved for any such work > even if he wanted to do it (which he didn't). You didn't need a security clearance to work on theoretical physics, within OR. Thousand of mathematicians and physicists worked in this way, during WWII. In 1936, Einstein filed a Declaration of Intention to become an American citizen. He became a U.S. citizen in 1940, but retained his Swiss citizenship. Declaration of Intention for Albert Einstein (doc. from US government): https://www.loc.gov/resource/gdcwdl.wdl_02745/?r=-0.013,0.156,1.485,0.603,0 After he became a US citizen, in 1940, he was obliged to follow any request from the US gov. in war times, since Pearl Harbor. Here is swearing his allegiance to US laws and Constitution, on October 01, 1940 : https://www.facebook.com/History101magazine/photos/a.608192056205191/1017507371940322/?type=3 https://www.rarenewspapers.com/view/613338 Einstein In his study at Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, where he was engaged in research for the U.S. Navy, 24 July 1943. With him are Captain Geoffrey E. Sage, USN, Commanding Officer, Naval Training Station, Princeton (at left); and Lieutenant Commander Frederick L. Douthit, USNR, Executive Officer, Naval Training Station, Princeton. Official U.S. Navy Photograph, now in the collections of the National Archives. https://www.history.navy.mil/our-collections/photography/numerical-list-of-images/nara-series/80-g/80-G-40000/80-G-42919.html As ANYONE CAN READ, this document is from the US NAVY ARCHIVES! Einstein, the pacifist, working for the US Navy https://www.jstor.org/stable/24537208 So, Volney, ADAPT your delusion TO REALITY.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-21 11:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e6aa20a0-b3be-413d-8cab-f327181b5d89n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613392 |
After being drafted by the US Navy, Einstein asked for permission to spend some summer days on vacations: Letter of Albert Einstein to the Lieutenant Stephen Brunauer, U.S. Navy Bureau of Ordnance https://www.docsteach.org/documents/document/letter-of-albert-einstein-to-the-lieutenant-stephen-brunauer-us-navy-bureau-of-ordnance
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-21 11:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d3fc347a-af0a-4d0b-89cd-1c4adc633d53n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613392 |
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 11:17:43 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > Einstein In his study at Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, where he was engaged in research for the U.S. Navy, 24 July 1943. With him are Captain Geoffrey E. Sage, USN, Commanding Officer, Naval Training Station, Princeton (at left); and Lieutenant Commander Frederick L. Douthit, USNR, Executive Officer, Naval Training Station, Princeton. Official U.S. Navy Photograph, now in the collections of the National Archives. > https://www.history.navy.mil/our-collections/photography/numerical-list-of-images/nara-series/80-g/80-G-40000/80-G-42919.html > > As ANYONE CAN READ, this document is from the US NAVY ARCHIVES! > > Einstein, the pacifist, working for the US Navy > https://www.jstor.org/stable/24537208 > > > So, Volney, ADAPT your delusion TO REALITY. What did Einstein do for the Navy? Twiddle his thumbs and make things up?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-21 11:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0fd1d3ca-4c2f-4d1a-8082-e76546a13f2an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613394 |
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 3:22:38 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 11:17:43 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > Einstein In his study at Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, where he was engaged in research for the U.S. Navy, 24 July 1943. With him are Captain Geoffrey E. Sage, USN, Commanding Officer, Naval Training Station, Princeton (at left); and Lieutenant Commander Frederick L. Douthit, USNR, Executive Officer, Naval Training Station, Princeton. Official U.S. Navy Photograph, now in the collections of the National Archives. > > https://www.history.navy.mil/our-collections/photography/numerical-list-of-images/nara-series/80-g/80-G-40000/80-G-42919.html > > > > As ANYONE CAN READ, this document is from the US NAVY ARCHIVES! > > > > Einstein, the pacifist, working for the US Navy > > https://www.jstor.org/stable/24537208 > > > > > > So, Volney, ADAPT your delusion TO REALITY. > What did Einstein do for the Navy? Twiddle his thumbs and make things up? One job was to determine which was the best impact area by torpedoes, in order to sink any kind of ships, as well as the amount of explosive charge (energy of detonation and exact place along the ship structure, like over or under the line of flotation).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-21 11:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <472bc347-54e3-4043-97b4-0980907994d2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613396 |
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 11:26:11 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 3:22:38 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 11:17:43 AM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > Einstein In his study at Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, where he was engaged in research for the U.S. Navy, 24 July 1943. With him are Captain Geoffrey E. Sage, USN, Commanding Officer, Naval Training Station, Princeton (at left); and Lieutenant Commander Frederick L. Douthit, USNR, Executive Officer, Naval Training Station, Princeton. Official U.S. Navy Photograph, now in the collections of the National Archives. > > > https://www.history.navy.mil/our-collections/photography/numerical-list-of-images/nara-series/80-g/80-G-40000/80-G-42919.html > > > > > > As ANYONE CAN READ, this document is from the US NAVY ARCHIVES! > > > > > > Einstein, the pacifist, working for the US Navy > > > https://www.jstor.org/stable/24537208 > > > > > > > > > So, Volney, ADAPT your delusion TO REALITY. > > What did Einstein do for the Navy? Twiddle his thumbs and make things up? > One job was to determine which was the best impact area by torpedoes, in order to sink any kind of ships, as well as the > amount of explosive charge (energy of detonation and exact place along the ship structure, like over or under the line of flotation). He would be pathetic at that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-20 18:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <be2c7f85-cd6e-4c4e-8042-5c40adf95203n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613339 |
El martes, 20 de junio de 2023 a las 18:51:34 UTC-4, Richard Hertz escribió: > On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:24:50 PM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 2:48:05 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > I'm quoting here what Clemence, the guy that corrected Newcomb and still is a mandatory reference, > > > had to say about Mercury and Einstein's paper, based on his GR (1943, 1947, 1952). > > > > > > ************************************************************************************** > > > Gerald Clemence ( Rev. Mod. Phys. 19, 361364, 1947) > > > > > > "According to general theory of relativity, the elliptical orbit of a planet referred to a Newtonian frame of reference rotates > > > in its own plane in the same direction as the planet moves... > > > > > > The observations cannot be made in a Newtonian frame of reference. They are affected by the precession of the equinoxes, > > > and the determination of the precessional motion is one of the most difficult problems of observational astronomy. > > > > > > It is not surprising that a difference of opinions could exist regarding the closeness of agreement of observed and > > > theoretical motions... I am not aware that relativity is at present regarded by physicists as a theory that may be > > > believed or not, at will. Nevertheless, it may be of some interest to present the most recent evidence on the degree of > > > agreement between the observed and theoretical motions of the planets." > > > ************************************************************************************** > > > > > > And the above was extracted from this paper of Vankov, the Russian physicist who made an incredible forensic analysis > > > of the Nov. 18, 1915 paper, which WAS NOT translated to English for many decades, and still remains hard to get. Here is > > > link to the English translation, work performed by Professor Roger Rydin from the University of Virginia, who paid much > > > attention to linguistic fidelity and scientific adequacy of the texts. > > > > > > Vankov adds: "It is followed with our critical Comments concerning the rigor of Einstein’s derivation of the equation of motion > > > and the corresponding approximate solution leading to the perihelion advance formula. The latter was obtained in numerous > > > works later on from the Schwarzschild “exact” solution". > > > > > > Einstein’s Paper: “Explanation of the Perihelion Motion of Mercury from General Relativity Theory” > > > Anatoli Andrei Vankov > > > > > > https://etienneklein.fr/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Relativit%C3%A9-g%C3%A9n%C3%A9rale.pdf > > > > > > As in his other paper, of which I provided a link in the OP of this thread. > > > > > > > > > It's clearly demonstrated that Einstein and partners (like the astronomer Freundlich) cooked the paper ENTIRELY, making several > > > noticeable HACKS and subtle FUDGING of equations, just to get the Gerber's formula from 1898. His numerical calculations, don > > > in the last page out of 12, just as a justification to prove Gerber and Newcomb values of 43"/century. What really matter is HOW > > > he FUDGED the integral of his Eq. 11, FORCING THE RESULT to deliver +43" INSTEAD OF -14" (without the fraudulent addition of > > > a term in front of the integral). I claimed that this fraud has been silenced FOR DECADES. > > > > > > EXCERPT FROM VANKOV'S CRITICS > > > ****************************************** > > > 2.1.1 Historical remarks > > > Einstein’s paper devoted to the GR prediction of Mercury’s perihelion advance, Doc.24 (see Notes), is the only one among his publication that contains the explanation of the GR effect. In his following paper "The Foundations of the General Theory of Relativity, 1916, Doc.30", > > > Einstein presents his new (he called it “correct”) calculation of the bending of light while the Mercury perihelion is only mentioned by > > > referring it as in Doc.24, along with Schwarzshild’s work on “the exact solution”. Since then, to our knowledge, he never returned to the methodology of the GR perihelion advance problem. > > > ****************************************** > > > > > > -14"/century, not 43"/century, is the value obtained CORRECTING THE COOK/FRAUD. > > Yes, I have that translation. It includes this: "It is after all the clear meaning of your problem in the best order. > > It is an entirely wonderful thing, that from one so abstract an idea comes > > out such a conclusive clarification of the Mercury anomaly. > > As you see, it means that the friendly war with me, in which in spite of > > your considerable protective fire throughout the terrestrial distance, allows > > this stroll in your fantasy land." - Schwarzschild’s letter to Einstein > I wrote MANY TIMES here about the importance of Schwarzschild in the life of Einstein, between 1913 and 1915, as ADVISOR > (to the least, and probably more than that). > > 1) Schwarzschild convinced two parts to put the money for a 12 years contract (more than $ 2.4 millions in today's money). > > 2) Schwarzschild had volunteered to fight (artillery official) at the eastern front, since mid 1915. YET, he obtained A LICENSE > to witness Einstein's lecture to the Prussian Academy of Science, that day Nov. 18, 1915. That lecture was published by the > PAS one month later, with minor modifications. HE WAS THERE THAT DAY, then went back to the front and got the lethal > autoimmune skin disease that killed him 5 months later. > > 3) Schwarzschild wrote his exact solution, in polar coordinates, and sent it to Einstein 3 WEEKS LATER!!! > He had the solution beforehand, and knew tensors and curvature of space/time SINCE 1900!! > > His seminal paper "About the curvature of the universe", written and published in 1900, is considered FOUNDATIONAL for > what is today COSMOLOGY. Nobody, before him, did attempt to EXPLAIN the behavior of the whole universe (by then, it was > the Milky Way, and had a length of 10,000 ly). > > But he has half jew, and because of THIS he has been ignored by the zionist cabal on his role in GR. He volunteered being 41, > without need, just to prove THAT HE WAS A PATRIOT. And he died for this, while Einstein stole every single credit for EVERYTHING. > What a total load of crap!!! Schwarzschild's solution was the first available GR solution and clearly made him worldwide famous. Had he not died in 1916, he would have continued to contribute a lot to the development of GR. "Schwarzschild provided the first exact solution to the Einstein field equations of general relativity, for the limited case of a single spherical non-rotating mass, which he accomplished in 1915, the same year that Einstein first introduced general relativity. The Schwarzschild solution, which makes use of Schwarzschild coordinates and the Schwarzschild metric, leads to a derivation of the Schwarzschild radius, which is the size of the event horizon of a non-rotating black hole".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-20 15:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <09e1d764-28b8-40c0-a4ea-3df58b68ce2en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613328 |
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 2:48:05 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > I'm quoting here what Clemence, the guy that corrected Newcomb and still is a mandatory reference, > had to say about Mercury and Einstein's paper, based on his GR (1943, 1947, 1952). > > ************************************************************************************** > Gerald Clemence ( Rev. Mod. Phys. 19, 361364, 1947) > > "According to general theory of relativity, the elliptical orbit of a planet referred to a Newtonian frame of reference rotates > in its own plane in the same direction as the planet moves... > > The observations cannot be made in a Newtonian frame of reference. They are affected by the precession of the equinoxes, > and the determination of the precessional motion is one of the most difficult problems of observational astronomy. > > It is not surprising that a difference of opinions could exist regarding the closeness of agreement of observed and > theoretical motions... I am not aware that relativity is at present regarded by physicists as a theory that may be > believed or not, at will. Nevertheless, it may be of some interest to present the most recent evidence on the degree of > agreement between the observed and theoretical motions of the planets." > ************************************************************************************** > > And the above was extracted from this paper of Vankov, the Russian physicist who made an incredible forensic analysis > of the Nov. 18, 1915 paper, which WAS NOT translated to English for many decades, and still remains hard to get. Here is > link to the English translation, work performed by Professor Roger Rydin from the University of Virginia, who paid much > attention to linguistic fidelity and scientific adequacy of the texts. > > Vankov adds: "It is followed with our critical Comments concerning the rigor of Einstein’s derivation of the equation of motion > and the corresponding approximate solution leading to the perihelion advance formula. The latter was obtained in numerous > works later on from the Schwarzschild “exact” solution". > > Einstein’s Paper: “Explanation of the Perihelion Motion of Mercury from General Relativity Theory” > Anatoli Andrei Vankov > > https://etienneklein.fr/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Relativit%C3%A9-g%C3%A9n%C3%A9rale.pdf > > As in his other paper, of which I provided a link in the OP of this thread. > > > It's clearly demonstrated that Einstein and partners (like the astronomer Freundlich) cooked the paper ENTIRELY, making several > noticeable HACKS and subtle FUDGING of equations, just to get the Gerber's formula from 1898. His numerical calculations, don > in the last page out of 12, just as a justification to prove Gerber and Newcomb values of 43"/century. What really matter is HOW > he FUDGED the integral of his Eq. 11, FORCING THE RESULT to deliver +43" INSTEAD OF -14" (without the fraudulent addition of > a term in front of the integral). I claimed that this fraud has been silenced FOR DECADES. > > EXCERPT FROM VANKOV'S CRITICS > ****************************************** > 2.1.1 Historical remarks > Einstein’s paper devoted to the GR prediction of Mercury’s perihelion advance, Doc.24 (see Notes), is the only one among his publication that contains the explanation of the GR effect. In his following paper "The Foundations of the General Theory of Relativity, 1916, Doc.30", > Einstein presents his new (he called it “correct”) calculation of the bending of light while the Mercury perihelion is only mentioned by > referring it as in Doc.24, along with Schwarzshild’s work on “the exact solution”. Since then, to our knowledge, he never returned to the methodology of the GR perihelion advance problem. > ****************************************** > > -14"/century, not 43"/century, is the value obtained CORRECTING THE COOK/FRAUD. He gives a reference to another of his own works I like: "General Relativity Problem of Mercury’s Perihelion Advance Revisited"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-21 19:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0ab226c7-02e6-45a1-bb5b-ecaba590dad5n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613164 |
In this paper, one of many from Vankov: General Relativity Problem of Mercury’s Perihelion Advance Revisited Anatoli Andrei Vankov 46 pages, 2010 https://arxiv.org/pdf/1008.1811.pdf he cites 42 references (books and papers from 1882 to 2008), that support or are critics of the theory of relativity (both). In particular, I downloaded this book from Muller (1953), which deals with GR and SR. The book is a first class material for students of relativity and, being of my interest, contain a detailed analysis of the three predictions that Einstein did prior to the development of the 1915 GR. In particular, the analysis of the Mercury's perihelion advance (using Schwarzschild, but following in detail Einstein's 1915 paper) derives the same formulae as Einstein (and Gerber). This section was strongly criticized by Vankov, as it reproduces the same sloppy approximations that Einstein did in his Nov.18, 1915 paper, but with much more clarity and additional explanations. Anyone can download the 409 pages book, by just googling: THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY BY C. MOLLER PROFESSOR OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS IN THE UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN Oxford University Press. 1955, Second Edition and go to XII EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF THE GENERAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY. 130. The advance of the perihelion of Mercury (page 366) which is one of the targets of the criticism of Vankov. It's like if Einstein's paper can be analyzed 40 years after by two first grade physicists, with two completely different positions about THIS particular prediction of GR. Enjoy, and it might help to understand Vankov papers (many), against this particular problem, with more clarity and depth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 07:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <99bf6c82-6cd2-48bb-a937-3d42e601b6b7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613164 |
What IS NEVER SAID: Apples + Oranges = Total Mercury's perihelion advance. Clemence values (1943, 1947, 1952): Newton: 532.33"/cy [Contributions of every planet, CALCULATED WITH INFINITE SPEED OF GRAVITY] MISSING: 42.98"/cy [Assigned to GR, CALCULATED WITH SPEED OF GRAVITY = c] OBSERVATIONAL ASTRONOMY: 575.31"/cy The above values are from an undisputed calculation that was made almost 125 years ago by Newcomb and NOBODY, after Einstein 1919, dared to refute. In particular, Clemence. This, alone, serves to display THE HOAX of GR PREDICTION (even Gerber's prediction of the speed of gravity) And, for the shame of astronomy and physics in general, the explanation of 1915 GR has been hold for more than a century, Because nobody dares to embarrass the name and actions of the International Astronomical Union (IAU), founded in 1919 and partners in this crime on science. Observe the year of creation of the IAU, created ad-hoc of the HOAX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 16:47 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kflpkbF457bU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #613526 |
On 2023-06-23 14:07:28 +0000, Richard Hertz said: > What IS NEVER SAID: Apples + Oranges = Total Mercury's perihelion advance. Of course it's never said: it's gibberish. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 08:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <778ec761-cd5f-4169-bb39-eaf41d8f136bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613527 |
On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 11:47:43 AM UTC-3, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-06-23 14:07:28 +0000, Richard Hertz said: > > > What IS NEVER SAID: Apples + Oranges = Total Mercury's perihelion advance. > Of course it's never said: it's gibberish. > > -- > athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots You don't understand shit about this. Please, stay with your sticky enzymes, your safe place.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 13:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <u74js7$3pf2d$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #613533 |
On 6/23/2023 11:51 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 11:47:43 AM UTC-3, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >> On 2023-06-23 14:07:28 +0000, Richard Hertz said: >> >>> What IS NEVER SAID: Apples + Oranges = Total Mercury's perihelion advance. >> Of course it's never said: it's gibberish. >> >> -- >> athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots > > You don't understand shit about this. It's so simple that even you should be able to understand it. The precession of the orbit of Mercury is measured; The precession caused by the other planets etc. is calculated and subtracted from the measured value; The difference is about 43"/century; Einstein's GR predicts about 43"/century. Nothing else predicts it; Therefore, there is supporting evidence for GR.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Epifanio Schoonenburg <urou@sucinora.br> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 17:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <u74kog$1fko4$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
| In reply to | #613539 |
Volney wrote: > On 6/23/2023 11:51 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: >> You don't understand shit about this. > > It's so simple that even you should be able to understand it. > The precession of the orbit of Mercury is measured; > The precession caused by the other planets etc. is calculated and > subtracted from the measured value; The difference is about 43"/century; > Einstein's GR predicts about 43"/century. Nothing else predicts it; > Therefore, there is supporting evidence for GR. wow, because the Einstine was a khazar, or what?? You khazars goys just destroyed Einstine. You don't believe The Bible, but you use The Bible when you are about to steal a land. *_"I_steal_this_land,_because_it_stays_in_The_Bible"_*. Nato kiss my ass. Beside *_illegal_bioweapon_labs_in_uKurine_*, you know nothing about relativity. I strongly start to believe, Einstine was a *_falsflag_event_*.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 10:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <35738c6d-5ad4-4b80-b5f2-ab16086bf0a4n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613539 |
On Friday, 23 June 2023 at 19:13:47 UTC+2, Volney wrote: > On 6/23/2023 11:51 AM, Richard Hertz wrote: > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 11:47:43 AM UTC-3, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > >> On 2023-06-23 14:07:28 +0000, Richard Hertz said: > >> > >>> What IS NEVER SAID: Apples + Oranges = Total Mercury's perihelion advance. > > >> Of course it's never said: it's gibberish. > >> > >> -- > >> athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots > > > > You don't understand shit about this. > It's so simple that even you should be able to understand it. > > The precession of the orbit of Mercury is measured; > The precession caused by the other planets etc. is calculated and > subtracted from the measured value; > The difference is about 43"/century; > Einstein's GR predicts about 43"/century. Nothing else predicts it; > Therefore, there is supporting evidence for GR. It's evidence that we're FORCED to THE BEST WAY, sure. And for your ISO idiocy being a "Newton mode" as well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Reginal Langbroek <gorl@gblarllb.ra> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 17:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <u74le4$1fko4$2@paganini.bofh.team> |
| In reply to | #613542 |
Maciej Wozniak wrote: > On Friday, 23 June 2023 at 19:13:47 UTC+2, Volney wrote: >> Einstein's GR predicts about 43"/century. Nothing else predicts it; >> Therefore, there is supporting evidence for GR. > > It's evidence that we're FORCED to THE BEST WAY, sure. And for your ISO > idiocy being a "Newton mode" as well. there are no forces acting in Gravity, my friend. Are you a goy of polakia? You want to steal a country, misnamed right now, as ukurine?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web