Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #613164 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-06-17 21:32 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-09-07 16:51 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 317 — 40 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-17 21:32 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-18 10:44 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-18 10:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-18 11:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-18 13:10 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-18 15:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-06-19 09:31 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-19 07:45 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-19 07:51 -0700
Cranks Richard Hertz, Laurence Clark and Pat Dolan keep on slobbering "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-06-19 07:56 -0700
Re: Cranks Richard Hertz, Laurence Clark and Pat Dolan keep on slobbering Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-19 08:01 -0700
Re: Cranks Richard Hertz, Laurence Clark and Pat Dolan keep on slobbering "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-06-19 11:55 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-19 10:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-19 10:53 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-06-19 07:52 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 14:48 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 15:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 15:51 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 16:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-20 20:05 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 18:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 20:19 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-20 21:08 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 21:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-21 06:23 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-21 17:41 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-21 10:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-21 13:39 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-22 11:04 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-22 11:04 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-22 02:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-21 12:09 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-21 10:53 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-22 11:04 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-22 11:06 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-23 11:49 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 08:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-23 11:59 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 10:38 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-23 13:28 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Chaston Kuipers <rsoc@scusseee.ps> - 2023-06-23 21:42 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-24 10:46 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-24 10:46 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 08:05 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 08:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 09:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 10:30 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 10:54 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:04 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:28 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 13:44 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-25 13:48 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 11:48 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 07:22 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 10:15 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 11:06 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 11:31 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:45 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-26 22:53 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 14:58 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-24 11:23 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 08:44 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:17 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:22 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:22 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:26 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-21 11:39 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paparios <mrios@ing.puc.cl> - 2023-06-20 18:33 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-20 15:31 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 19:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 07:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 16:47 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 08:51 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-23 13:13 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Epifanio Schoonenburg <urou@sucinora.br> - 2023-06-23 17:28 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 10:35 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Reginal Langbroek <gorl@gblarllb.ra> - 2023-06-23 17:40 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 10:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 12:01 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 12:58 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 13:02 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-23 21:28 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 15:49 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 16:35 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 17:55 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 16:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-23 16:46 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 09:51 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-27 10:55 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 12:50 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 13:58 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 12:32 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-27 21:55 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 13:41 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-27 23:30 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 21:14 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-28 13:23 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 07:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 10:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-28 23:31 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-28 15:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-29 12:48 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 06:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-29 11:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-09-08 12:47 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 04:36 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 06:12 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-09-08 16:11 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 08:46 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 20:28 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-09-09 11:28 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 21:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 21:57 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 22:52 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 20:28 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 23:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 20:28 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 15:36 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-29 12:48 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-29 12:08 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 13:31 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 13:23 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 16:44 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 15:23 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 19:40 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 19:12 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 23:37 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 16:19 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-30 19:52 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-30 20:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-30 22:47 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 09:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 13:07 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 13:39 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 13:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 15:57 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 14:00 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 18:02 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 15:04 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 18:08 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 16:17 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 19:35 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 16:18 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 16:40 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 19:40 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-01 20:14 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 21:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-02 00:46 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-01 22:13 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 07:27 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-02 12:07 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 09:34 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-02 19:06 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 10:09 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-07-03 01:47 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 20:57 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 11:13 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-02 13:33 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 12:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 12:57 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-02 23:17 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-03 11:27 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-02 01:26 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 11:12 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 13:04 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-02 13:53 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-02 01:15 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-01 19:39 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Smith Can <aanh@nnnttcth.ia> - 2023-07-01 22:10 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-01 13:26 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Hillary Oorschot <lara@aocolror.ya> - 2023-06-29 21:29 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 17:04 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Emanuele Heel <manl@eeeeleee.ll> - 2023-06-29 22:31 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-29 20:30 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 19:53 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-29 19:46 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's David Agteren <ainv@gvdideig.aa> - 2023-06-30 09:18 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-30 09:17 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Woodrow Richard <rwao@rwwrrooo.rw> - 2023-07-01 11:43 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Demonte Achthoven <oado@ennmoaea.ch> - 2023-06-28 16:42 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Braxton Amstel <txmt@asememtm.ra> - 2023-06-28 16:50 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Bob Rumpade <peab@orbmarer.ou> - 2023-06-28 23:04 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-28 13:23 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2023-06-28 15:09 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 17:47 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 18:46 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-28 20:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 21:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-29 12:48 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 05:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-28 21:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Lou <noelturntive@live.co.uk> - 2023-06-29 05:53 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 07:02 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-29 12:14 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 12:17 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 14:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 15:09 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 15:42 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 15:51 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 17:33 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 13:27 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 14:16 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-30 19:44 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-30 21:08 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 21:49 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-30 00:25 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's Peter-John Maes <a-he@t-jtrjsm.ee> - 2023-06-30 11:13 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-30 00:23 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-06-30 11:45 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 04:13 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-01 13:26 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 14:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 19:30 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-03 19:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:34 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-07 11:13 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Keaton Konstantatos <ktnn@tksatooa.ta> - 2023-07-07 19:16 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-08 11:40 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 02:59 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-08 10:23 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 13:20 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 13:19 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-10 13:28 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 13:39 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-10 18:45 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 17:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-10 20:52 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 19:17 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 19:26 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 19:36 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 11:58 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 03:30 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-11 06:40 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-12 15:02 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-12 18:14 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-12 16:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-12 21:30 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-07-12 19:08 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-12 19:29 -0700
Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 18:48 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-13 20:48 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 08:29 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 08:38 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 08:52 -0700
Re: Kapo Imbecile Richard Hertz gets to eat shit Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-14 09:47 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-12 21:36 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-10 23:14 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 20:43 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Barton Demakis <erom@akadikmr.no> - 2023-07-11 09:24 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Pasquale Nomikos <osai@qoauqsqm.ka> - 2023-07-08 20:47 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-07-09 12:35 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 09:29 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:11 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:38 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:40 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 10:44 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 12:22 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:00 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:32 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:34 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:40 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 11:27 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 12:03 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 12:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 12:56 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:39 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-08 13:47 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 14:20 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 22:24 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:01 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 14:10 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:16 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 12:08 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-09 14:25 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 18:43 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 16:07 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 16:18 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Lee Kanavos <alke@avvvvekn.ll> - 2023-07-09 19:21 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 13:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-09 19:54 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 21:25 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 21:58 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-10 13:31 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 10:37 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Jeiker Paraskos <okas@ppkiesre.rr> - 2023-07-10 22:20 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-10 16:30 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-10 23:27 -0400
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Eugene Antimisiaris <anse@neanenae.ir> - 2023-07-11 09:07 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Wyouman Petrakis <iawp@eyapkrsk.or> - 2023-07-10 11:39 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 14:34 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 15:05 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-08 17:46 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-09 11:12 +0200
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Fraga Kalakos <akol@fgkkakar.gk> - 2023-07-09 15:11 +0000
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-08 19:00 -0500
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 17:06 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz refuses to concede, "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-08 06:16 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 08:57 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 09:05 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 11:21 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-18 13:05 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-18 13:09 -0700
Re: The HOAX of Einstein's Mercury's 43"/century perihelion advance exposed. Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 16:44 -0700
Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 16:56 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 18:43 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 19:30 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 19:46 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-18 20:37 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2023-07-18 21:30 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 14:06 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 16:20 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 16:54 -0700
Re: Crank Richard Hertz digs up some fellow crank Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 16:51 -0700
Page 2 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 16 Next page →
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-20 18:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62d559d6-671f-4872-becc-d4f133cf50fan@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613349 |
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 10:05:47 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote: <snip> > "He denied the existence of a God that cares for humans, he argued that > there is nothing divine about morality, he did not believe in any holy > Scriptures, he had no faith in religious teachings, he rejected the > authority of all churches and temples, he belonged to no congregation, > he denied the existence of souls, life after death, divine rewards or punishments." > > <https://notevenpast.org/was-einstein-really-religious-0/#:~:text=He%20denied%20the%20existence%20of,the%20existence%20of%20souls%2C%20life> <snip> - He was mainly a racist and a communist, an advocate of One World Government. - He EXPRESSED his thoughts about chinese as a filthy, inferior race, completely different from the japanese (World Tour 1922-1925). - He EXPRESSED his thoughts of brazilian ENGINEERS as ignorant monkies (World Tour 1922-1925, Latam Section). Same with black people. - He only had social ties with WEALTHY JEWS, and scientific ties with jew or zionist scientists (do you want the list?). - He, by design, acted as the front man of the jew revolution in physics, taking all the credits. The cabal buried his "helpers" in history. - He couldn't handle the superior intellect of Mileva Maric, his legitimate spouse. He thought that women were inferior beings, only apt to cook, clean and make babies. He hated any women in science, philosophy, mathematics, etc. He HATED Mm. Curie. - He hated Germany and non-jew german scientists, in particular after 1919 and the wave of critics for his behavior. While his "colleagues" were starving, after WWI, he fled Germany for the Zionist World Fundraising Tour. He was DESPISED there, and he expressed his fear to be assassinated, so he ran away. - He was an early supporter of gay and lesbians, and the first wave of movements to legalize homosexuality (Michel Besso?). - He was a cynical back-stabber. The list of "friends" betrayed by him has no less than a dozen jews. Not for nothing Besso kept the 1913 (54 pages) manuscript under his bed until his death in 1954 (41 years). Being analyzed by dozen of scholars in the '70s and '80s, showed no less than 200 fatal errors and misconceptions on the analysis of Mercury, which shows how IMBECILE IGNORANT he was. The manuscript is online, along with more than 200 pages of details written by scholars. The difference between this manuscript and "his" 1915 paper is abysmal, proving that TWO DIFFERENT teams were involved. And BOTH ARE WRONG. - He believed in a God that did care for him, and he wrote about that many times. - He, maybe forced to, embraced his jewinesh openly after 1915. - He supported the atomic bomb, but to be dropped on Germany, not Japan. He was a war consultant (forced or not) for the Pentagon, about how to KILL people more efficiently (like those in ships). - He was a natural-born SOB.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-20 20:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <507a1e8b-19e8-4a42-949d-ee6b1332eeaan@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613351 |
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:00:01 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > - He supported the atomic bomb, but to be dropped on Germany, not Japan. He was a war consultant (forced or not) for > the Pentagon, about how to KILL people more efficiently (like those in ships). > > - He was a natural-born SOB. All very interesting but I doubt he was a consultant for the Manhattan Project. I think the important point is that relativity is essentially idol worship and Einstein really wasn't much of a physicist. Because of a desire to pop the bubble of idol worshipers sometimes he may be criticized slightly too harshly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-20 21:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a6d1d307-ea89-4838-866b-6d14d8905718n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613354 |
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 12:19:24 AM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:00:01 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > - He supported the atomic bomb, but to be dropped on Germany, not Japan. He was a war consultant (forced or not) for > > the Pentagon, about how to KILL people more efficiently (like those in ships). > > > > - He was a natural-born SOB. > All very interesting but I doubt he was a consultant for the Manhattan Project. I think the important point is that relativity is essentially idol worship and Einstein really wasn't much of a physicist. Because of a desire to pop the bubble of idol worshipers sometimes he may be criticized slightly too harshly. I didn't mention the Manhattan Project. I wrote that he worked, part-time, as a war consultant scientist, as many other prominent scientists which didn't know squat about nuclear physics, but knew classic physics. A LOT of them worked in the nascent field of Operational Research, which was developed to merge all branches of physics, chemistry and mathematics into a systemic methodology to focus all of it into specific objectives: algorithms for any conceivable thing, new methods for older problems, cross-fertilization of ideas from different specialists, etc. Much of what is the infrastructure of the modern industry was born during WWII, based on Operational Research, which covered almost any field of activity: From hard sciences, economics, social sciences, political engineering up to making canned food. One of the main drives of OR was the optimization of cost/benefits for whatever.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-20 21:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4bc3d4f4-39b1-47ad-a3d5-b91b0dc93cd9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613356 |
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 9:08:14 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 12:19:24 AM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:00:01 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > - He supported the atomic bomb, but to be dropped on Germany, not Japan. He was a war consultant (forced or not) for > > > the Pentagon, about how to KILL people more efficiently (like those in ships). > > > > > > - He was a natural-born SOB. > > All very interesting but I doubt he was a consultant for the Manhattan Project. I think the important point is that relativity is essentially idol worship and Einstein really wasn't much of a physicist. Because of a desire to pop the bubble of idol worshipers sometimes he may be criticized slightly too harshly. > I didn't mention the Manhattan Project. I wrote that he worked, part-time, as a war consultant scientist, as many other prominent scientists > which didn't know squat about nuclear physics, but knew classic physics. > > A LOT of them worked in the nascent field of Operational Research, which was developed to merge all branches of physics, chemistry and > mathematics into a systemic methodology to focus all of it into specific objectives: algorithms for any conceivable thing, new methods for > older problems, cross-fertilization of ideas from different specialists, etc. Much of what is the infrastructure of the modern industry was > born during WWII, based on Operational Research, which covered almost any field of activity: From hard sciences, economics, social > sciences, political engineering up to making canned food. One of the main drives of OR was the optimization of cost/benefits for whatever. I'm sure he wasn't of any real help there, of all places! How did he get involved?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-21 06:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kfg4tlF7q4aU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #613357 |
On 6/20/2023 11:11 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 9:08:14 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: >> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 12:19:24 AM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>> On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:00:01 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: >>> >>>> - He supported the atomic bomb, but to be dropped on Germany, not Japan. He was a war consultant (forced or not) for >>>> the Pentagon, about how to KILL people more efficiently (like those in ships). >>>> >>>> - He was a natural-born SOB. >>> All very interesting but I doubt he was a consultant for the Manhattan Project. I think the important point is that relativity is essentially idol worship and Einstein really wasn't much of a physicist. Because of a desire to pop the bubble of idol worshipers sometimes he may be criticized slightly too harshly. >> I didn't mention the Manhattan Project. I wrote that he worked, part-time, as a war consultant scientist, as many other prominent scientists >> which didn't know squat about nuclear physics, but knew classic physics. >> >> A LOT of them worked in the nascent field of Operational Research, which was developed to merge all branches of physics, chemistry and >> mathematics into a systemic methodology to focus all of it into specific objectives: algorithms for any conceivable thing, new methods for >> older problems, cross-fertilization of ideas from different specialists, etc. Much of what is the infrastructure of the modern industry was >> born during WWII, based on Operational Research, which covered almost any field of activity: From hard sciences, economics, social >> sciences, political engineering up to making canned food. One of the main drives of OR was the optimization of cost/benefits for whatever. > I'm sure he wasn't of any real help there, of all places! How did he get involved? Wheeler and Einstein were friends. Wheeler's graduate student classes and Wheeler attended an annual tea at Einstein's home. Wheeler actively participated in the Manhattan project and had started teaching at Princeton in 1938. I suggest that any involvement Einstein *may* have had with the project was unofficial.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-21 17:41 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qcoo48.1sdjhqnwml6itN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #613372 |
whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > On 6/20/2023 11:11 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 9:08:14?PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > >> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 12:19:24?AM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen: > >>> On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:00:01?PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > >>> > >>>> - He supported the atomic bomb, but to be dropped on Germany, not > >>>> Japan. He was a war consultant (forced or not) for the Pentagon, > >>>> about how to KILL people more efficiently (like those in ships). > >>>> > >>>> - He was a natural-born SOB. All very interesting but I doubt he was > >>>a consultant for the Manhattan Project. I think the important point is > >>>that relativity is essentially idol worship and Einstein really wasn't > >>>much of a physicist. Because of a desire to pop the bubble of idol > >>>worshipers sometimes he may be criticized slightly too harshly. > >> I didn't mention the Manhattan Project. I wrote that he worked, > >> part-time, as a war consultant scientist, as many other prominent > >> scientists which didn't know squat about nuclear physics, but knew > >> classic physics. > >> > >> A LOT of them worked in the nascent field of Operational Research, > >> which was developed to merge all branches of physics, chemistry and > >> mathematics into a systemic methodology to focus all of it into > >> specific objectives: algorithms for any conceivable thing, new methods > >> for older problems, cross-fertilization of ideas from different > >> specialists, etc. Much of what is the infrastructure of the modern > >> industry was born during WWII, based on Operational Research, which > >> covered almost any field of activity: From hard sciences, economics, > >> social sciences, political engineering up to making canned food. One of > >> the main drives of OR was the optimization of cost/benefits for > >> whatever. > > > > I'm sure he wasn't of any real help there, of all places! How did he get > > involved? > > Wheeler and Einstein were friends. Wheeler's graduate > student classes and Wheeler attended an annual tea at > Einstein's home. > Wheeler actively participated in the Manhattan project and > had started teaching at Princeton in 1938. I suggest that > any involvement Einstein *may* have had with the project was > unofficial. The nutters here are completely crazy about all that 'Einstein and bomb' stuff. He had nothing to do with it, apart from recommending starting the project. (urged by Szilard) Einstein didn't have any security clearance. On the contrary, Hoover was quite delusional about Einstein being a secret communist. (and spent large amounts of taxpayer money in vain attempts to prove it) Talking about anything to do with the Manhattan project with Einstein would have been seen as high treason. (and yes, the phones were tapped, and Hoover's gumshoes were everwhere) And why would they want too? Wheeler was an expert on general relativity, and he made many important contributions to the subject. He also played a major part in popularising it, and in getting it better understood. They had more interesting, and more important things to talk about than technical trivia, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-21 10:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bd5f9f88-8c36-4473-b396-c1dca22cc2a8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613372 |
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 4:23:37 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 6/20/2023 11:11 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 9:08:14 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > >> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 12:19:24 AM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > >>> On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:00:01 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > >>> > >>>> - He supported the atomic bomb, but to be dropped on Germany, not Japan. He was a war consultant (forced or not) for > >>>> the Pentagon, about how to KILL people more efficiently (like those in ships). > >>>> > >>>> - He was a natural-born SOB. > >>> All very interesting but I doubt he was a consultant for the Manhattan Project. I think the important point is that relativity is essentially idol worship and Einstein really wasn't much of a physicist. Because of a desire to pop the bubble of idol worshipers sometimes he may be criticized slightly too harshly. > >> I didn't mention the Manhattan Project. I wrote that he worked, part-time, as a war consultant scientist, as many other prominent scientists > >> which didn't know squat about nuclear physics, but knew classic physics. > >> > >> A LOT of them worked in the nascent field of Operational Research, which was developed to merge all branches of physics, chemistry and > >> mathematics into a systemic methodology to focus all of it into specific objectives: algorithms for any conceivable thing, new methods for > >> older problems, cross-fertilization of ideas from different specialists, etc. Much of what is the infrastructure of the modern industry was > >> born during WWII, based on Operational Research, which covered almost any field of activity: From hard sciences, economics, social > >> sciences, political engineering up to making canned food. One of the main drives of OR was the optimization of cost/benefits for whatever. > > > I'm sure he wasn't of any real help there, of all places! How did he get involved? > Wheeler and Einstein were friends. Wheeler's graduate > student classes and Wheeler attended an annual tea at > Einstein's home. > > Wheeler actively participated in the Manhattan project and > had started teaching at Princeton in 1938. I suggest that > any involvement Einstein *may* have had with the project was > unofficial. Thanks for the info. But what did relativity contribute to the atomic bomb? The mass-energy relationship was already well-known before Einstein's relativistic version.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-21 13:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kfgug0FbkppU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #613391 |
On 6/21/2023 12:59 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 4:23:37 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> On 6/20/2023 11:11 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>> On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 9:08:14 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 12:19:24 AM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:00:01 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> - He supported the atomic bomb, but to be dropped on Germany, not Japan. He was a war consultant (forced or not) for >>>>>> the Pentagon, about how to KILL people more efficiently (like those in ships). >>>>>> >>>>>> - He was a natural-born SOB. >>>>> All very interesting but I doubt he was a consultant for the Manhattan Project. I think the important point is that relativity is essentially idol worship and Einstein really wasn't much of a physicist. Because of a desire to pop the bubble of idol worshipers sometimes he may be criticized slightly too harshly. >>>> I didn't mention the Manhattan Project. I wrote that he worked, part-time, as a war consultant scientist, as many other prominent scientists >>>> which didn't know squat about nuclear physics, but knew classic physics. >>>> >>>> A LOT of them worked in the nascent field of Operational Research, which was developed to merge all branches of physics, chemistry and >>>> mathematics into a systemic methodology to focus all of it into specific objectives: algorithms for any conceivable thing, new methods for >>>> older problems, cross-fertilization of ideas from different specialists, etc. Much of what is the infrastructure of the modern industry was >>>> born during WWII, based on Operational Research, which covered almost any field of activity: From hard sciences, economics, social >>>> sciences, political engineering up to making canned food. One of the main drives of OR was the optimization of cost/benefits for whatever. >> >>> I'm sure he wasn't of any real help there, of all places! How did he get involved? >> Wheeler and Einstein were friends. Wheeler's graduate >> student classes and Wheeler attended an annual tea at >> Einstein's home. >> >> Wheeler actively participated in the Manhattan project and >> had started teaching at Princeton in 1938. I suggest that >> any involvement Einstein *may* have had with the project was >> unofficial. > Thanks for the info. But what did relativity contribute to > the atomic bomb? The mass-energy relationship was already > well-known before Einstein's relativistic version. "He joined the Manhattan Project in 1942, first at the University of Chicago’s Metallurgical Laboratory and then with DuPont in Wilmington, Delaware. Wheeler was the leading physicist in residence at Hanford and is credited with solving the riddle of the B Reactor going dead a few hours after it started, an event that threatened to seriously delay the first production of plutonium." https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/profile/john-wheeler/ In my experience the branches involved in any major project touch all sorts of issues one doesn't, out of hand, particularly associate with such major projects.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 11:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qcq13p.1io85dnz7srz8N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #613399 |
whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> wrote: > On 6/21/2023 12:59 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > Thanks for the info. But what did relativity contribute to > > the atomic bomb? The mass-energy relationship was already > > well-known before Einstein's relativistic version. > > "He joined the Manhattan Project in 1942, first at the University of > Chicago's Metallurgical Laboratory and then with DuPont in Wilmington, > Delaware. Wheeler was the leading physicist in residence at Hanford and > is credited with solving the riddle of the B Reactor going dead a few > hours after it started, an event that threatened to seriously delay the > first production of plutonium." Also memorable as one of the occasions on which Feyman roundly admitted to having been wrong. The engineers had designed the reactor with more fuel tubes that necessary for achieving criticality. Feynman criticised them for that. After Wheeler had identified the problem it could be easily remedied by adding more fuel rods in the 'superfluous' tubes. This would have been impossible if Feynman's ideas had been followed in the construction. Jan > https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/profile/john-wheeler/ > > In my experience the branches involved in any major project touch all > sorts of issues one doesn't, out of hand, particularly associate with > such major projects.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 11:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qcq17c.1a66xcphjml50N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #613391 |
Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 4:23:37?AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > On 6/20/2023 11:11 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 9:08:14?PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > >> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 12:19:24?AM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen: > > >>> On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:00:01?PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > >>> >> - He supported the atomic bomb, but to be dropped on Germany, not > > >>Japan. He was a war consultant (forced or not) for >> the Pentagon, > > >>about how to KILL people more efficiently (like those in ships). >> >> > > >>- He was a natural-born SOB. > All very interesting but I doubt he was > > >>a consultant for the Manhattan Project. I think the important point is > > >>that relativity is essentially idol worship and Einstein really wasn't > > >>much of a physicist. Because of a desire to pop the bubble of idol > > >>worshipers sometimes he may be criticized slightly too harshly. I > > >>didn't mention the Manhattan Project. I wrote that he worked, > > >>part-time, as a war consultant scientist, as many other prominent > > >>scientists which didn't know squat about nuclear physics, but knew > > >>classic physics. > > >> > > >> A LOT of them worked in the nascent field of Operational Research, > > >> which was developed to merge all branches of physics, chemistry and > > >> mathematics into a systemic methodology to focus all of it into > > >> specific objectives: algorithms for any conceivable thing, new > > >> methods for older problems, cross-fertilization of ideas from > > >> different specialists, etc. Much of what is the infrastructure of the > > >> modern industry was born during WWII, based on Operational Research, > > >> which covered almost any field of activity: From hard sciences, > > >> economics, social sciences, political engineering up to making canned > > >> food. One of the main drives of OR was the optimization of > > >> cost/benefits for whatever. > > > > > I'm sure he wasn't of any real help there, of all places! How did he > > get involved? Wheeler and Einstein were friends. Wheeler's graduate > > student classes and Wheeler attended an annual tea at Einstein's home. > > > > Wheeler actively participated in the Manhattan project and had started > > teaching at Princeton in 1938. I suggest that any involvement Einstein > > *may* have had with the project was unofficial. > Thanks for the info. But what did relativity contribute to the atomic > bomb? The mass-energy relationship was already well-known before > Einstein's relativistic version. Not really. What was known before Einstein was what was then known as 'the velocity dependence of mass'. Lorentz had the right relativistic answer, many others had different and hence wrong answers. The concept of -rest mass- also being energy is really due to Einstein. From there to nuclear binding energy manifesting itself as mass differences between nuclei took another 30 years to establish. (by high precision mass spectroscopy) The uranium isotope U235 wasn't discovered until 1935, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 02:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1eb98431-79a2-446f-8996-71deb8ae7d1bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613440 |
On Thursday, 22 June 2023 at 11:03:47 UTC+2, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 4:23:37?AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > > On 6/20/2023 11:11 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 9:08:14?PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > >> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 12:19:24?AM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen: > > > >>> On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:00:01?PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > > > >>> >> - He supported the atomic bomb, but to be dropped on Germany, not > > > >>Japan. He was a war consultant (forced or not) for >> the Pentagon, > > > >>about how to KILL people more efficiently (like those in ships). >> >> > > > >>- He was a natural-born SOB. > All very interesting but I doubt he was > > > >>a consultant for the Manhattan Project. I think the important point is > > > >>that relativity is essentially idol worship and Einstein really wasn't > > > >>much of a physicist. Because of a desire to pop the bubble of idol > > > >>worshipers sometimes he may be criticized slightly too harshly. I > > > >>didn't mention the Manhattan Project. I wrote that he worked, > > > >>part-time, as a war consultant scientist, as many other prominent > > > >>scientists which didn't know squat about nuclear physics, but knew > > > >>classic physics. > > > >> > > > >> A LOT of them worked in the nascent field of Operational Research, > > > >> which was developed to merge all branches of physics, chemistry and > > > >> mathematics into a systemic methodology to focus all of it into > > > >> specific objectives: algorithms for any conceivable thing, new > > > >> methods for older problems, cross-fertilization of ideas from > > > >> different specialists, etc. Much of what is the infrastructure of the > > > >> modern industry was born during WWII, based on Operational Research, > > > >> which covered almost any field of activity: From hard sciences, > > > >> economics, social sciences, political engineering up to making canned > > > >> food. One of the main drives of OR was the optimization of > > > >> cost/benefits for whatever. > > > > > > > I'm sure he wasn't of any real help there, of all places! How did he > > > get involved? Wheeler and Einstein were friends. Wheeler's graduate > > > student classes and Wheeler attended an annual tea at Einstein's home. > > > > > > Wheeler actively participated in the Manhattan project and had started > > > teaching at Princeton in 1938. I suggest that any involvement Einstein > > > *may* have had with the project was unofficial. > > > Thanks for the info. But what did relativity contribute to the atomic > > bomb? The mass-energy relationship was already well-known before > > Einstein's relativistic version. > Not really. What was known before Einstein was what was then known as > 'the velocity dependence of mass'. > Lorentz had the right relativistic answer, > many others had different and hence wrong answers. And while the answers of our Giant Guru are the only right answers - forbidden by your bunch of idiots "improper" clocks keep measuring t'=t, just like all serious clocks always did.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-21 12:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <u6v7bn$2uo4t$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #613357 |
On 6/21/2023 12:11 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 9:08:14 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: >> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 12:19:24 AM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>> All very interesting but I doubt he was a consultant for the Manhattan Project. I think the important point is that relativity is essentially idol worship and Einstein really wasn't much of a physicist. Because of a desire to pop the bubble of idol worshipers sometimes he may be criticized slightly too harshly. >> I didn't mention the Manhattan Project. I wrote that he worked, part-time, as a war consultant scientist, as many other prominent scientists >> which didn't know squat about nuclear physics, but knew classic physics. >> >> A LOT of them worked in the nascent field of Operational Research, which was developed to merge all branches of physics, chemistry and >> mathematics into a systemic methodology to focus all of it into specific objectives: algorithms for any conceivable thing, new methods for >> older problems, cross-fertilization of ideas from different specialists, etc. Much of what is the infrastructure of the modern industry was >> born during WWII, based on Operational Research, which covered almost any field of activity: From hard sciences, economics, social >> sciences, political engineering up to making canned food. One of the main drives of OR was the optimization of cost/benefits for whatever. > I'm sure he wasn't of any real help there, of all places! How did he get involved? Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything military-related. He had no security clearance. The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which he didn't).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-21 10:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <00c491a0-754a-4454-bdb7-c794ad5831c1n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613376 |
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > On 6/21/2023 12:11 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 9:08:14 PM UTC-7, Richard Hertz wrote: > >> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 12:19:24 AM UTC-3, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > >>> All very interesting but I doubt he was a consultant for the Manhattan Project. I think the important point is that relativity is essentially idol worship and Einstein really wasn't much of a physicist. Because of a desire to pop the bubble of idol worshipers sometimes he may be criticized slightly too harshly. > >> I didn't mention the Manhattan Project. I wrote that he worked, part-time, as a war consultant scientist, as many other prominent scientists > >> which didn't know squat about nuclear physics, but knew classic physics. > >> > >> A LOT of them worked in the nascent field of Operational Research, which was developed to merge all branches of physics, chemistry and > >> mathematics into a systemic methodology to focus all of it into specific objectives: algorithms for any conceivable thing, new methods for > >> older problems, cross-fertilization of ideas from different specialists, etc. Much of what is the infrastructure of the modern industry was > >> born during WWII, based on Operational Research, which covered almost any field of activity: From hard sciences, economics, social > >> sciences, political engineering up to making canned food. One of the main drives of OR was the optimization of cost/benefits for whatever. > > > I'm sure he wasn't of any real help there, of all places! How did he get involved? > Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > military-related. > > He had no security clearance. > > The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > he didn't). Thank you for the interesting facts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 11:04 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qcq341.9xiqyp17pffubN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #613390 |
Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: [-] > > Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > military-related. > > > > He had no security clearance. > > > > The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > he didn't). > Thank you for the interesting facts. I find it somewhat surprising that you, given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, didn't discover the facts on your own. The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) and there is even a whole book about them, [1] Jan [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War Against the World's Most Famous Scientist
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-22 11:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <78426d0d-0cda-488f-9878-8b40c8e381e9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613441 |
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > [-] > > > Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > > military-related. > > > > > > He had no security clearance. > > > > > > The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > > have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > > he didn't). > > Thank you for the interesting facts. > I find it somewhat surprising that you, > given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > didn't discover the facts on your own. > > The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > Jan > > [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > Against the World's Most Famous Scientist Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 11:49 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1qcrznr.19rsi6j12pzw9fN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #613455 |
Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > [-] > > > > Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > > > military-related. > > > > > > > > He had no security clearance. > > > > > > > > The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > > > have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > > > he didn't). > > > Thank you for the interesting facts. > > I find it somewhat surprising that you, > > given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > > didn't discover the facts on your own. > > > > The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > > and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > > > Jan > > > > [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > > Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. Zero, Zilch, Nada, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 08:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <159a06b4-3a14-4e63-a921-fe040a3d8081n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613521 |
On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > > > [-] > > > > > Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > > > > > military-related. > > > > > > > > > > He had no security clearance. > > > > > > > > > > The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > > > > > have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > > > > > he didn't). > > > > Thank you for the interesting facts. > > > I find it somewhat surprising that you, > > > given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > > > didn't discover the facts on your own. > > > > > > The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > > > and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > > > Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > > Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > > Zero, Zilch, Nada, > > Jan Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had nothing to do with it either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 11:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kfm1c6F58kbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #613531 |
On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: >> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: >>>> [-] >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything >>>>>> military-related. >>>>>> >>>>>> He had no security clearance. >>>>>> >>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would >>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which >>>>>> he didn't). >>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. >>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, >>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, >>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. >>>> >>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) >>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> >>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War >>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist >>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. >> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims >> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. >> >> Zero, Zilch, Nada, >> >> Jan > Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had nothing to do with it either. Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was involved in lots of technological research/development other than the relativity he was most famous for.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 10:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <58520d51-e093-4e33-b477-1aecdda59113n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #613537 |
On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 9:59:55 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: > >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: > >>>> [-] > >>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything > >>>>>> military-related. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> He had no security clearance. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would > >>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which > >>>>>> he didn't). > >>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. > >>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, > >>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, > >>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. > >>>> > >>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) > >>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] > >>>> > >>>> Jan > >>>> > >>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War > >>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist > >>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. > >> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims > >> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. > >> > >> Zero, Zilch, Nada, > >> > >> Jan > > Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had nothing to do with it either. > Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was > involved in lots of technological research/development other than > the relativity he was most famous for. How could he have contributed anything of real value when relativity is pseudoscience?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-23 13:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kfm6jcF5qrvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #613544 |
On 6/23/2023 12:38 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 9:59:55 AM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >> On 6/23/2023 10:37 AM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: >>> On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 2:49:35 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:03:48?AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>>>>> Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 9:09:30?AM UTC-7, Volney wrote: >>>>>> [-] >>>>>>>> Einstein was a pacifist; he would not want to work on anything >>>>>>>> military-related. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He had no security clearance. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The FBI thought he was a flaming communist; there is no way he would >>>>>>>> have been approved for any such work even if he wanted to do it (which >>>>>>>> he didn't). >>>>>>> Thank you for the interesting facts. >>>>>> I find it somewhat surprising that you, >>>>>> given your penchant for crank anti-Einstein books, >>>>>> didn't discover the facts on your own. >>>>>> >>>>>> The FBI files on Einstein are by now declassified, (on fbi.gov) >>>>>> and there is even a whole book about them, [1] >>>>>> >>>>>> Jan >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] Fred Jerome - The Einstein File: J. Edgar Hoover's Secret War >>>>>> Against the World's Most Famous Scientist >>>>> Einstein's politics are very tangential to scientific concerns. >>>> Whatever. They are perpendicular to all silly claims >>>> that Einstein may have been involved with the atomic bomb project. >>>> >>>> Zero, Zilch, Nada, >>>> >>>> Jan >>> Not only did he have nothing to do with the atomic bomb, relativity had nothing to do with it either. >> Most people forget (if they ever actually knew) that Einstein was >> involved in lots of technological research/development other than >> the relativity he was most famous for. > How could he have contributed anything of real value when relativity is pseudoscience? Check his patent applications and other economic activities. There is a lot of crap included whenever one uses "Einstein" in an internet search. The internet has been achieving less as its "dumbing down" progresses. It will probably take some time for this phenomena to subside and for internet searches to yield academically significant results once more. Hopefully all the books will not have been burned in the interim.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web