Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #425054 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-15 18:57 +0000 |
| Last post | 2017-07-22 17:58 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 148 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 18:57 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 19:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 19:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 20:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 00:49 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-17 22:34 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:53 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:49 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-07-16 12:24 +1000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-16 11:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-16 11:18 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-16 12:35 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 10:07 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:09 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 13:24 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 19:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 18:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:48 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:56 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:50 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-17 22:37 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 13:26 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:09 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:51 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:01 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 14:33 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 20:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 23:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:03 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:23 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 00:00 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:04 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:03 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 12:38 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:44 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 12:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:54 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:25 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 21:19 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:22 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 16:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 17:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 15:36 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 21:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-19 20:21 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:32 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 16:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:58 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:52 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:49 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 19:13 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:03 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:53 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:53 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:57 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-07-16 20:35 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-07-16 21:19 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 19:30 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 02:02 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 02:02 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:21 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:17 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 15:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:09 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:58 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:01 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:33 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:04 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 19:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 17:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:19 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:41 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:34 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:05 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-17 22:06 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 18:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:27 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:58 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:26 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:47 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 17:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:43 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:35 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:06 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:15 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 00:02 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:35 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:04 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:15 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 21:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 21:23 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 03:42 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 11:29 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 17:27 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 19:17 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 00:15 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 21:20 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 01:41 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 09:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 21:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:13 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 05:49 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 15:26 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 12:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:10 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 18:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 15:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 19:32 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 22:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-22 10:51 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 17:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 17:58 -0500
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-19 20:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596ffa0c$0$17305$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425508 |
On 7/18/2017 1:55 PM, Ustin Veterre wrote: > jimp wrote: > >> In sci.physics Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> wrote: >>> jimp wrote: >>> >>>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>>> the copper. >>> >>> Idiot, this might have been fifty years ago. Today around and below >>> 0201 components what you say is toootaly stupid. All smd boards are >>> today gold plated, no need for solder. What an idiot. >> >> Yet another idiot nym for the kill file. > > chimp doesn't even know what a 0201 stands for, thank you very moch. > Neither do you. (stands for the dimensions (minuscule) of the neurons in what tries to pass as your brain)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-20 16:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okqn4n$2e4$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425640 |
benj wrote: >>>> Idiot, this might have been fifty years ago. Today around and below >>>> 0201 components what you say is toootaly stupid. All smd boards are >>>> today gold plated, no need for solder. What an idiot. >>> >>> Yet another idiot nym for the kill file. >> >> chimp doesn't even know what a 0201 stands for, thank you very moch. >> > Neither do you. (stands for the dimensions (minuscule) of the neurons in > what tries to pass as your brain) Judging your big mouth you definitely should know. How about a 01005, sounds more familiar? The problem with you and jimp is, attempting to hide your stupidity behind some other, even bigger ,stupidity. Will never work.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 14:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okijam$11hn$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425222 |
Serg io wrote: >>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>> >>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >> >> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs >> are plated in gold. Please shut up. >> >> > wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated > in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. A bunch of hald-engineers cretins inhere, not knowing what is going on in physics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 10:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okimfq$1854$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425306 |
On 7/17/2017 9:58 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Serg io wrote: > >>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>> >>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>> >>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs >>> are plated in gold. Please shut up. >>> >>> >> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. > > A bunch of hald-engineers cretins inhere, not knowing what is going on in > physics. > you can buy gold laquer on ebay, cheap.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jios3e-me7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #425181 |
In sci.physics Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> wrote: > Michael Moroney wrote: > >> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. > > Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, silver nowhere. And copper is > less corrosive than silver. Pure silver let alone corrodes in a matter of > hours, then its electrical characteristics degrades rapidly jeopardising > all circuitry, especially HF. You and your friend Sylvia are uneducated > cretins. Dr. Garfield is consistent in his treatise. Idiot nym shifting moron. Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" is actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. Gold may be everywhere on connectors but the thickness is measured in atoms because of the cost and is used only to provide better corrosion resistance to the underlying copper than tin provides. FYI isotope separation for the Manhatten Project was done with silver coils made from silver borrowed from the US Treasury. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Project#Electromagnetic_separation -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 18:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okgcfv$1ksj$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425197 |
jimp wrote: > Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" is > actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. Alloy, or plated with something else, idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 19:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okgvfm$l1q$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425201 |
On 7/16/2017 1:49 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > jimp wrote: > >> Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" is >> actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. > > Alloy, or plated with something else, idiot. > Na, motherboards chipped and tested in box at a store with a price of $50. assuming they make 50% profit, the gold contant is less than $ 0.50
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 15:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okijjl$11hn$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425243 |
Serg io wrote: > On 7/16/2017 1:49 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >> jimp wrote: >> >>> Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" >>> is actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. >> >> Alloy, or plated with something else, idiot. > > Na, motherboards chipped and tested in box at a store with a price of > $50. assuming they make 50% profit, the gold contant is less than $ 0.50 Since you are stupid, then yes, you only get that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 10:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okimi2$1854$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425309 |
On 7/17/2017 10:03 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Serg io wrote: > >> On 7/16/2017 1:49 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>> jimp wrote: >>> >>>> Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" >>>> is actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. >>> >>> Alloy, or plated with something else, idiot. >> >> Na, motherboards chipped and tested in box at a store with a price of >> $50. assuming they make 50% profit, the gold contant is less than $ 0.50 > > Since you are stupid, then yes, you only get that. > I feel sorry for you, I add +20 points to your IQ. Feel Better ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 18:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okgcnh$1ksj$7@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425197 |
jimp wrote: > Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" is > actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. And btw, ICs are all gold inside. NOT silver. You guys are new-beginners in physics and technology. Don't start me in nano-tech and how those things are put together.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 16:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okgnen$9qh$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425203 |
On 7/16/2017 1:53 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > jimp wrote: > >> Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" is >> actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. > > And btw, ICs are all gold inside. NOT silver. You guys are new-beginners > in physics and technology. Don't start me in nano-tech and how those > things are put together. > wrong again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 00:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596c43b9$0$57965$c3e8da3$aae71a0a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425203 |
On 07/16/2017 02:53 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > jimp wrote: > >> Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" is >> actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. > > And btw, ICs are all gold inside. NOT silver. You guys are new-beginners > in physics and technology. Don't start me in nano-tech and how those > things are put together. > Gold or aluminum you dumb shit. The only nano-technology is the brain inside your miniature skull. IC are NOT "all gold" inside. Just certain areas coated. A big loud mouth does not equal intelligence, all Libs have proved that theorem beyond any doubt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 15:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okik3i$11ho$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425263 |
benj wrote: > On 07/16/2017 02:53 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >> jimp wrote: >> >>> Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" >>> is actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. >> >> And btw, ICs are all gold inside. NOT silver. You guys are >> new-beginners in physics and technology. Don't start me in nano-tech >> and how those things are put together. >> > Gold or aluminum you dumb shit. The only nano-technology is the brain > inside your miniature skull. IC are NOT "all gold" inside. Just certain > areas coated. A big loud mouth does not equal intelligence, all Libs > have proved that theorem beyond any doubt. A dumb shit is your mother. You however, an Imbecile. Let's hope mister Tom will not help you out, since there is an obvious reason, on why GOLD is prefered and used in nono-tech, here IC /MCUs. 14nm fab and less is not even possible without gold. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14_nanometer Take a look at that picture, idiot, all gold inside. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:4-fach-NAND-C10.JPG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 10:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okimlp$1854$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425311 |
On 7/17/2017 10:11 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > benj wrote: > >> On 07/16/2017 02:53 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>> jimp wrote: >>> >>>> Silver is still used a lot in microwave hardware and the "corrosion" >>>> is actually sulfation which has little to no effect on RF properties. >>> >>> And btw, ICs are all gold inside. NOT silver. You guys are >>> new-beginners in physics and technology. Don't start me in nano-tech >>> and how those things are put together. >>> >> Gold or aluminum you dumb shit. The only nano-technology is the brain >> inside your miniature skull. IC are NOT "all gold" inside. Just certain >> areas coated. A big loud mouth does not equal intelligence, all Libs >> have proved that theorem beyond any doubt. > > A dumb shit is your mother. You however, an Imbecile. Let's hope mister > > Take a look at that picture, idiot, all gold inside. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:4-fach-NAND-C10.JPG > wrong, that is ancient Mexican Indian Azteck Symbol
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 20:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <okgbm8$tea$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #425138 |
Den 16.07.2017 14.35, skrev Michael Moroney: > The nymshifting troll, posting as Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> writes: > >> Silver is strict avoided in electronics also because the capacitance and >> induction induced in circuitry by that corrosion. Use your brain before >> you post, lady mam. > > Admit it, nymshifter, you got caught in a mistake. Copper corrodes even > worse than silver, yet it is used all over the place. The reason for that > is because silver is simply too expensive compared to copper. Gold is an > even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used only where its > superior corrosion resistance is necessary. > Because of the skin effect, RF coils are very often made of silver plated copper wire. And wave-guides for microwave frequencies are almost always silver plated on the inside. -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okgbve$1ksj$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425192 |
Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Because of the skin effect, RF coils are very often made of silver > plated copper wire. > And wave-guides for microwave frequencies are almost always silver > plated on the inside. You forgot a lay of protection over, and is not pure silver, but whatever concentration alloy. I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 21:19 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <okge77$o6h$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #425196 |
Den 16.07.2017 20.40, skrev Winfred Plumer: > I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry. > https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-2.html https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-1.html http://www.hbrindustries.com/coil-types https://www.labkings.com/rf-coil/rf-coil-silver-pe.html https://www.meinhard.com/index.cfm/category/421/rf-coils.cfm http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec22-asx/hookup-86.php http://www.tempoelectric.com/cables.htm https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html http://www.precisionglassblowing.com/product/agilent-7500-rf-coil-silver/ http://www.analyticalwest.com/products/icp-oes/icp-oes-jobin-yvon/load-coil/rf-coil-silver.html -- Paul https://paulba.no/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 19:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okgesj$1ksj$8@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425207 |
Paul B. Andersen wrote: > Den 16.07.2017 20.40, skrev Winfred Plumer: >> I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry. >> > https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-2.html > https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-1.html > http://www.hbrindustries.com/coil-types > https://www.labkings.com/rf-coil/rf-coil-silver-pe.html > https://www.meinhard.com/index.cfm/category/421/rf-coils.cfm > http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec22-asx/hookup-86.php > http://www.tempoelectric.com/cables.htm > https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html > http://www.precisionglassblowing.com/product/agilent-7500-rf-coil-silver/ > http://www.analyticalwest.com/products/icp-oes/icp-oes-jobin-yvon/load- coil/rf-coil-silver.html Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. They use silver as a title, you need to look into the datasheet, as always. To see the characteristics, tolerance etc. More than likely plated with something else. Air and water kills silver in no time. Basic things.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 16:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okgnke$9qh$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425209 |
On 7/16/2017 2:30 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Paul B. Andersen wrote: > >> Den 16.07.2017 20.40, skrev Winfred Plumer: >>> I doubt pure silver is used anywhere in circuitry. >>> >> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-2.html >> https://www.surplussales.com/Inductors/Ind-RFCoils/Ind-RFCoils-1.html >> http://www.hbrindustries.com/coil-types >> https://www.labkings.com/rf-coil/rf-coil-silver-pe.html >> https://www.meinhard.com/index.cfm/category/421/rf-coils.cfm >> http://www.cmewire.com/catalog/sec22-asx/hookup-86.php >> http://www.tempoelectric.com/cables.htm >> https://www.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-silver-conductor.html >> http://www.precisionglassblowing.com/product/agilent-7500-rf-coil-silver/ >> http://www.analyticalwest.com/products/icp-oes/icp-oes-jobin-yvon/load- > coil/rf-coil-silver.html > > Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. They use silver as a title, you need to > look into the datasheet, as always. To see the characteristics, tolerance > etc. More than likely plated with something else. Air and water kills > silver in no time. Basic things. > it is silver, probably 90%, some hardener, and corrosion does not hurt performance like you think it does. I know one factory that produces silver commutators from pure silver stock.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 15:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okik8m$11ho$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425226 |
Serg io wrote: >> Thanks. I doubt is pure silver. They use silver as a title, you need to >> look into the datasheet, as always. To see the characteristics, >> tolerance etc. More than likely plated with something else. Air and >> water kills silver in no time. Basic things. > > it is silver, probably 90%, some hardener, and corrosion does not hurt You have to look into the datasheet for the specs etc. These morons are incapable to read datasheets and believe all taken from the frontpage.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web