Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #361552 > unrolled thread

Are there electrons that are different?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <dwuih2ht@djh3jg3ugh08.org> - 2015-08-22 20:28 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 20:34 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 20:41 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 21:16 -0500
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:23 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:29 +0200
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:31 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:37 +0200
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-24 11:17 -0400
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:46 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 20:44 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 20:54 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:11 -0500
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:22 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:29 -0500
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:33 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:35 -0500
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:38 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:11 -0400
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 23:54 -0400
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:41 +0000
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:28 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:17 +0200
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:25 +0000
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:40 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:51 +0200
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 17:03 +0000
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:50 +0000
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 14:07 -0500
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 19:10 +0000
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 19:24 +0000
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 19:59 +0000
                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 20:35 +0000
                          Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 15:54 +0000
                            Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:45 +0000
                              Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 19:08 +0000
                                Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 20:18 +0000
                                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 20:46 +0000
                                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 21:10 +0000
                                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 21:53 +0000
                                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 21:58 +0000
                                          Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 23:45 +0000
                                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 23:43 +0000
                          Re: Are there electrons that are different? Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 16:13 +0000
                            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-26 02:20 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-22 20:55 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:02 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:08 -0500
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:11 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 16:13 -0500
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:43 +0000
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:43 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:29 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-23 01:54 +0200
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:47 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 17:35 +0200
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 15:51 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:08 +0200
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:30 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-22 18:34 -0700
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 23:15 +0200
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:24 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-23 06:44 +0200
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-22 22:23 -0700
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-24 08:15 +0200
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-24 20:59 -0700
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-24 21:14 -0700
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-25 07:30 +0200
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-24 22:46 -0700
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? underante <underante@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-25 01:58 -0700
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-26 06:20 +0200
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:55 +0200
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 11:18 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-22 21:24 +0000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-22 21:27 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-23 01:40 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-22 18:28 -0700
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-08-23 17:06 +1000
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:53 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:55 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 19:27 +0200
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:44 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 19:25 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-24 16:18 -0400
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:40 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 22:20 +0200
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 12:53 -0400
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:54 +0000
    Re: Are there electrons that are different? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 09:11 -0500
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 14:18 +0000
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 17:24 +0200
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:33 +0000
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 21:59 +0200
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:06 +0000
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 22:06 +0200
      Re: Are there electrons that are different? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 12:02 -0400
        Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:09 +0000
          Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:16 +0200
            Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 16:37 +0000
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 18:50 +0200
                Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 18:46 +0000
                  Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 21:52 +0200
                    Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:03 +0000
                      Re: Are there electrons that are different? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-08-24 22:04 +0200
                        Re: Are there electrons that are different? James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> - 2015-08-24 20:21 +0000
              Re: Are there electrons that are different? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-24 13:48 -0400

Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →

#361576

In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
> */jimp/* wrote:
> 
>> However, before you do that, be sure to get a current tetanus shot,
>> which is another thing only humans have, as the survival rate for severe
>> tetanus is only about 35%.
> 
> This is a stupid thing to read in a science group. Most of the humans 
> never get tetanus, nor are vaccinated against that. Vaccines are obsolete 
> due to sanitation and many other things. You look like a joke, or terribly 
> not updated.

You really are a babbling idiot; tetanus is rare in the US and most
first world countries because of vaccination. Everyone who shows up to
a doctor with an injury that has any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated
on the spot.

The death rate for the rest of the world is about a quarter million
per year.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361670

*/jimp/* wrote:

> In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
>> */jimp/* wrote:
>> 
>>> However, before you do that, be sure to get a current tetanus shot,
>>> which is another thing only humans have, as the survival rate for
>>> severe tetanus is only about 35%.
>> 
>> This is a stupid thing to read in a science group. Most of the humans
>> never get tetanus, nor are vaccinated against that. Vaccines are
>> obsolete due to sanitation and many other things. You look like a joke,
>> or terribly not updated.
> 
> You really are a babbling idiot; tetanus is rare in the US and most
> first world countries because of vaccination. Everyone who shows up to a
> doctor with an injury that has any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on
> the spot.
> 
> The death rate for the rest of the world is about a quarter million per
> year.

Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the impertinence to 
post in a Science group. Even as getting an anti-tetanus shot, that 
supposedly is valid along a short period of time, say 3 years. Then you 
need another one, to stay updated. This type of vaccination is dropped in 
civilized countries. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361699

James Birdy wrote:

> Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the impertinence to
> post in a Science group. […]

ROTFL


PointedEars
-- 
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
 testing your knowledge means everything.”
   —Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
    in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361701

In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
> */jimp/* wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
>>> */jimp/* wrote:
>>> 
>>>> However, before you do that, be sure to get a current tetanus shot,
>>>> which is another thing only humans have, as the survival rate for
>>>> severe tetanus is only about 35%.
>>> 
>>> This is a stupid thing to read in a science group. Most of the humans
>>> never get tetanus, nor are vaccinated against that. Vaccines are
>>> obsolete due to sanitation and many other things. You look like a joke,
>>> or terribly not updated.
>> 
>> You really are a babbling idiot; tetanus is rare in the US and most
>> first world countries because of vaccination. Everyone who shows up to a
>> doctor with an injury that has any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on
>> the spot.
>> 
>> The death rate for the rest of the world is about a quarter million per
>> year.
> 
> Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the impertinence to 
> post in a Science group. Even as getting an anti-tetanus shot, that 
> supposedly is valid along a short period of time, say 3 years. Then you 
> need another one, to stay updated. This type of vaccination is dropped in 
> civilized countries. 

What part of everyone who shows up to a doctor with an injury that
has any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on the spot is it you failed
to understand, kook?

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361704

*/jimp/* wrote:

>> Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the impertinence
>> to post in a Science group. Even as getting an anti-tetanus shot, that
>> supposedly is valid along a short period of time, say 3 years. Then you
>> need another one, to stay updated. This type of vaccination is dropped
>> in civilized countries.
> 
> What part of everyone who shows up to a doctor with an injury that has
> any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on the spot is it you failed to
> understand, kook?

No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face, which 
looks stupid.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361706

James Birdy wrote:

> */jimp/* wrote:
>> What part of everyone who shows up to a doctor with an injury that has
>> any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on the spot is it you failed to
>> understand, kook?
> 
> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face, which
> looks stupid.

ROTFL


PointedEars
-- 
“Science is empirical: knowing the answer means nothing;
 testing your knowledge means everything.”
   —Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss, theoretical physicist,
    in “A Universe from Nothing” (2009)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361711

In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
> */jimp/* wrote:
> 
>>> Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the impertinence
>>> to post in a Science group. Even as getting an anti-tetanus shot, that
>>> supposedly is valid along a short period of time, say 3 years. Then you
>>> need another one, to stay updated. This type of vaccination is dropped
>>> in civilized countries.
>> 
>> What part of everyone who shows up to a doctor with an injury that has
>> any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on the spot is it you failed to
>> understand, kook?
> 
> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face, which 
> looks stupid.

That is just gibberish, kook.

Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook?

If so, you are totally wrong, kook.

Ask your mommy to take you to the doctor and explain it to you, kook.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361729

*/jimp/* wrote:

> In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
>> */jimp/* wrote:
>> 
>>>> Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the
>>>> impertinence to post in a Science group. Even as getting an
>>>> anti-tetanus shot, that supposedly is valid along a short period of
>>>> time, say 3 years. Then you need another one, to stay updated. This
>>>> type of vaccination is dropped in civilized countries.
>>> 
>>> What part of everyone who shows up to a doctor with an injury that has
>>> any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on the spot is it you failed to
>>> understand, kook?
>> 
>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face,
>> which looks stupid.
> 
> That is just gibberish, kook.
> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook?

So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you get 
it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you follow me?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361732

On 8/24/2015 1:50 PM, James Birdy wrote:

Just so you know, it takes me two clicks to killfile every new identity 
you create. It certainly takes you more effort to create them. Keep it 
up, waste your time, it's easy to keep up with you.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361734

*/Odd Bodkin/* wrote:

> On 8/24/2015 1:50 PM, James Birdy wrote:
> 
> Just so you know, it takes me two clicks to killfile every new identity
> you create. It certainly takes you more effort to create them. Keep it
> up,
> waste your time, it's easy to keep up with you.

Must be because you proved yourself nonsensical with your "Voltage 
difference". I don't really care man, if you don't want to read just not 
read. Only an unemployable will need a killfile and a program to help him 
not to read.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361736

In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
> */jimp/* wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
>>> */jimp/* wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> Hey listen, you seems to be severely uneducated having the
>>>>> impertinence to post in a Science group. Even as getting an
>>>>> anti-tetanus shot, that supposedly is valid along a short period of
>>>>> time, say 3 years. Then you need another one, to stay updated. This
>>>>> type of vaccination is dropped in civilized countries.
>>>> 
>>>> What part of everyone who shows up to a doctor with an injury that has
>>>> any risk of tetanus gets vaccinated on the spot is it you failed to
>>>> understand, kook?
>>> 
>>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face,
>>> which looks stupid.
>> 
>> That is just gibberish, kook.
>> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook?
> 
> So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you get 
> it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you follow me?

If you want to call 10 years "a short time", babbling kook.

You get it after an injury IF you haven't been vaccinated within the
last 10 years, thus being at risk for tetanus, babbling kook.

You are just another ignorant, bat shit crazy babbler.



-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361740

*/jimp/* wrote:

>>>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face,
>>>> which looks stupid.
>>> 
>>> That is just gibberish, kook.
>>> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook?
>> 
>> So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you
>> get it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you
>> follow me?
> 
> If you want to call 10 years "a short time", babbling kook.
> 
> You get it after an injury IF you haven't been vaccinated within the
> last 10 years, thus being at risk for tetanus, babbling kook.
> 
> You are just another ignorant, bat shit crazy babbler.

It must be your face than, you are so bleep stupid. They give you those 
unnecessary shots just to make sure. Even know you got one yesterday. 

Btw, "kook" comes from the urban dictionary. You are very urban, no doubts 
about that. Stop posting in a science group, go be urban somewhere else.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361751

In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
> */jimp/* wrote:
> 
>>>>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your face,
>>>>> which looks stupid.
>>>> 
>>>> That is just gibberish, kook.
>>>> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook?
>>> 
>>> So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you
>>> get it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you
>>> follow me?
>> 
>> If you want to call 10 years "a short time", babbling kook.
>> 
>> You get it after an injury IF you haven't been vaccinated within the
>> last 10 years, thus being at risk for tetanus, babbling kook.
>> 
>> You are just another ignorant, bat shit crazy babbler.
> 
> It must be your face than, you are so bleep stupid. They give you those 
> unnecessary shots just to make sure. Even know you got one yesterday. 
> 
> Btw, "kook" comes from the urban dictionary. You are very urban, no doubts 
> about that. Stop posting in a science group, go be urban somewhere else.

Seek help from a mental health professional, you babbling kook.

Learn how to compose a coherent sentence in English, you illiterate twit.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361802

jimp wrote:

> In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
>> */jimp/* wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your
>>>>>> face,
>>>>>> which looks stupid.
>>>>> 
>>>>> That is just gibberish, kook.
>>>>> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook?
>>>> 
>>>> So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you
>>>> get it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you
>>>> follow me?
>>> 
>>> If you want to call 10 years "a short time", babbling kook.
>>> 
>>> You get it after an injury IF you haven't been vaccinated within the
>>> last 10 years, thus being at risk for tetanus, babbling kook.
>>> 
>>> You are just another ignorant, bat shit crazy babbler.
>> 
>> It must be your face than, you are so bleep stupid. They give you those
>> unnecessary shots just to make sure. Even know you got one yesterday.
>> 
>> Btw, "kook" comes from the urban dictionary. You are very urban, no
>> doubts about that. Stop posting in a science group, go be urban
>> somewhere else.
> 
> Seek help from a mental health professional, you babbling kook.
> Learn how to compose a coherent sentence in English, you illiterate
> twit.

Sick turd loosing the argument, trolling now by attacking his English. One 
more chance batshit. You either

1. Get your worthless vaccines every 8 years for no reason.

Or 

2. You get your toe bad infected/injured, then later get your anti-tetanus 
vaccine.

Both variants are stupid. Which one is you, jimp?

Now watch the jimp vaporize.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361810

In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote:
> jimp wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics James Birdy <jamesb@barefootwalking.org> wrote:
>>> */jimp/* wrote:
>>> 
>>>>>>> No, you don't, kook. Not anymore. Maybe only to you, with your
>>>>>>> face,
>>>>>>> which looks stupid.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That is just gibberish, kook.
>>>>>> Are you trying to say this no longer happens, kook?
>>>>> 
>>>>> So we agree that those shots are short time/period delimited, and you
>>>>> get it AFTER the injury already happened. How smart is that? Can you
>>>>> follow me?
>>>> 
>>>> If you want to call 10 years "a short time", babbling kook.
>>>> 
>>>> You get it after an injury IF you haven't been vaccinated within the
>>>> last 10 years, thus being at risk for tetanus, babbling kook.
>>>> 
>>>> You are just another ignorant, bat shit crazy babbler.
>>> 
>>> It must be your face than, you are so bleep stupid. They give you those
>>> unnecessary shots just to make sure. Even know you got one yesterday.
>>> 
>>> Btw, "kook" comes from the urban dictionary. You are very urban, no
>>> doubts about that. Stop posting in a science group, go be urban
>>> somewhere else.
>> 
>> Seek help from a mental health professional, you babbling kook.
>> Learn how to compose a coherent sentence in English, you illiterate
>> twit.
> 
> Sick turd loosing the argument, trolling now by attacking his English. One 
> more chance batshit. You either
> 
> 1. Get your worthless vaccines every 8 years for no reason.

10 years and the reason is to avoid getting tetanus, kook.
 
> Or 
> 
> 2. You get your toe bad infected/injured, then later get your anti-tetanus 
> vaccine.

And hope you got the vaccination in time to save your life from an
incurable disease.

> Both variants are stupid. Which one is you, jimp?

Both variants have virtually eliminated people contracting tetanus in
the first world while the rest of the world dies at about a quarter
million a year, kook.

> Now watch the jimp vaporize.

Are you referring to the vapor between your ears, kook?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361824

jimp wrote:

>> Both variants are stupid. Which one is you, jimp?
> 
> Both variants have virtually eliminated people contracting tetanus in
> the first world while the rest of the world dies at about a quarter
> million a year, kook.

I disagree, jimp. You are an ignorant and know nothing about many things, 
let alone Science.

Vaccines did NOT eliminate anything, since this is not their task, jimp. 
Something aimed to eliminate would the own Immune Syste. You are batshit 
crazy, see a doctor, now!

All the germs in the world are already in your body, learn.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361834

In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote:
> jimp wrote:
> 
>>> Both variants are stupid. Which one is you, jimp?
>> 
>> Both variants have virtually eliminated people contracting tetanus in
>> the first world while the rest of the world dies at about a quarter
>> million a year, kook.
> 
> I disagree, jimp. You are an ignorant and know nothing about many things, 
> let alone Science.

Changing your name doesn't change the fact that you are a raving kook
and I could not care less that an idiot like you disagrees with me
about what can trivially be looked up, shit for brains.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361837

jimp wrote:

> In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote:
>> jimp wrote:
>> 
>>>> Both variants are stupid. Which one is you, jimp?
>>> 
>>> Both variants have virtually eliminated people contracting tetanus in
>>> the first world while the rest of the world dies at about a quarter
>>> million a year, kook.
>> 
>> I disagree, jimp. You are an ignorant and know nothing about many
>> things,
>> let alone Science.
> 
> Changing your name doesn't change the fact that you are a raving kook
> and I could not care less that an idiot like you disagrees with me about
> what can trivially be looked up, shit for brains.

Read for instance this one here
http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of-information-act-documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361841

In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote:
> jimp wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> wrote:
>>> jimp wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> Both variants are stupid. Which one is you, jimp?
>>>> 
>>>> Both variants have virtually eliminated people contracting tetanus in
>>>> the first world while the rest of the world dies at about a quarter
>>>> million a year, kook.
>>> 
>>> I disagree, jimp. You are an ignorant and know nothing about many
>>> things,
>>> let alone Science.
>> 
>> Changing your name doesn't change the fact that you are a raving kook
>> and I could not care less that an idiot like you disagrees with me about
>> what can trivially be looked up, shit for brains.
> 
> Read for instance this one here
> http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of-information-act-documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/

A kook news site, kook.

Try these, kook:
http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/tetanus/basics/definition/con-20021956
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetanus
http://www.medicinenet.com/tetanus/article.htm
https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/tetanus.html
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/tetanus/
http://www.vaccineinformation.org/tetanus/
http://pediatriceducation.org/2010/10/25/
http://www.smartvax.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=88:disease-risk-tetanus


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#361845

jimp wrote:

>>> Changing your name doesn't change the fact that you are a raving kook
>>> and I could not care less that an idiot like you disagrees with me
>>> about what can trivially be looked up, shit for brains.
>> 
>> Read for instance this one here
>> http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of-information-act-documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/
> 
> A kook news site, kook.

Read the references first, you batshit crazy idiot. 
Is this how your science works. Search for "gardasil victims" wherever
you may find appropriated, ie, but not mandatory
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/31/us-court-pays-6-million-gardasil-victims/?page=all

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web