Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #480513 > unrolled thread

Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy

Started by"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
First post2018-12-25 10:57 -0800
Last post2018-12-26 16:20 -0800
Articles 20 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-25 10:57 -0800
    Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:08 -0800
      Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0800
        Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-25 12:08 -0800
          Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-25 15:46 -0800
          Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-25 16:01 -0800
    Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2018-12-26 14:52 +1100
      Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-26 04:39 -0800
        Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-26 04:43 -0800
          Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-26 05:09 -0800
            Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-26 05:16 -0800
              Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-26 05:44 -0800
                Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-26 05:51 -0800
                  Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-26 06:30 -0800
        Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2018-12-27 08:56 +1100
          Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-26 14:03 -0800
            Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-26 14:09 -0800
              Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-26 15:00 -0800
                Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-26 15:29 -0800
                  Re: Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-26 16:20 -0800

#480513 — Radius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-25 10:57 -0800
SubjectRadius of Causality set by hbar & Planck Energy
Message-ID<a49eb6c6-dd5b-4d5f-be54-96c35ef76248@googlegroups.com>
My view as to why we always have the view that we are st the center of the universe is that .....

hbar sets the “Radius of Causality” at 13.8880509 Billion Light Years from where ever your view originates. 

We are always at “the center of causality” but not the center of the universe as it has no relationship to the center of an individuals locality. 

The universe may be spatial infinite or not, it doesn’t matter as long as our radius of causality does not actually contact the edge of the universe 


((((1 * (m^3)) / s) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) / (6.5248935 * ((m kg) / s))) * c)) / (0.5pi)) = hbar 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H92tB6d7Z-5IevkQmzvuTO5OooPlNoH4etv9e23-dcE

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#480514

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-25 11:08 -0800
Message-ID<390da01c-51ff-4e73-8f7a-81dc5700a2ce@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480513
A photon at Planck Temp can travel 13.8880509 billion years before being unable to perform useful work 

1.70377849e+53 kg * (((70406.791856 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) * (planck length / (2pi))) = 1.00000000 m kg/s 


((((1 * (m^3)) / s) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) / (6.5248935 * ((m kg) / s))) * c)) / (0.5pi)) = hbar 

((((1.70377849e+53 kg) * (1 kg)) / (6.80566761e-12 * kgf)) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) * pi)^2)) * G = 1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480516

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-25 11:49 -0800
Message-ID<0591b520-3f8d-4d28-801f-c499342106bc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480514
(8m^3/s/2)/((2pi*hbar)*c^2/(6.5248935 (kg m/s*c))) = (13.8880509 billion light years)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480517

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-25 12:08 -0800
Message-ID<e6376319-c5b8-4631-8116-414a4753ed8e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480516
((((2pi) * ((kg m) / s))^2)  / ((1.70377849e+53 kg)  * ((67798.6423 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc))) = hbar

Mass universe & Hubble & hbar

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480519

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-25 15:46 -0800
Message-ID<a0ec83ba-8924-42a0-87da-6bdce4c5b3fa@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480517
Hubble Constant

(1 Mpc) / ((c / G) / (pi^2 s)) = 67,798.6421 m^3/kg/s

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480520

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-25 16:01 -0800
Message-ID<af567f74-e59b-4e2c-93c1-80fb84cf71ef@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480517
Hubble & CMBR 

(1 Mpc) / ((c / G) / (pi^2 s)) = 67,798.6421 m^3/kg/s

((((7.04370151e+4 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) / (160.4589 GHz)) / G) * (6.5248935 * (kg^(-1)) * (m / s)) * (c^2) * (8 s) = 1 

7.04370151e+4 / (6.5248935 / (2pi)) = 67827.7459024

(1Mpc)*(((50^0.5*pi)*G)^2) = 67,827.0785 m^7/kg^2/s^4 = Mandelbrot = https://photos.app.goo.gl/LjkNEWrKWuoWSuQA7


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble%27s_law#Observed_values_of_the_Hubble_constant  

(((2pi * hbar * ((160.4589 GHz) / c)) * c) / eV) * (376.730313462 * 4) = 1 

1 / ((((2pi * hbar * ((160.4589 GHz) / c)) * c) / eV) * (137.0359993 * 4)) = 2.74913391

((((70406.7914 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) / (160.390049 GHz)) / G) * (6.5248935 * (kg^(-1)) * (m / s)) * (c^2) * (8 s) = 1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480521

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Date2018-12-26 14:52 +1100
Message-ID<g8gc8pF4735U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#480513
On 26/12/2018 5:57 am, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> My view as to why we always have the view that we are st the center of the universe is that .....
> 
> hbar sets the “Radius of Causality” at 13.8880509 Billion Light Years from where ever your view originates.
> 
> We are always at “the center of causality” but not the center of the universe as it has no relationship to the center of an individuals locality.
> 
> The universe may be spatial infinite or not, it doesn’t matter as long as our radius of causality does not actually contact the edge of the universe
> 
> 
> ((((1 * (m^3)) / s) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) / (6.5248935 * ((m kg) / s))) * c)) / (0.5pi)) = hbar
> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H92tB6d7Z-5IevkQmzvuTO5OooPlNoH4etv9e23-dcE
> 

This is gibberish.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480523

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-26 04:39 -0800
Message-ID<f6ac0b87-91ff-4249-b7b0-04a3c6c1d38a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480521
Sylvia Else escrito 

On 26/12/2018 5:57 am, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: 
> My view as to why we always have the view that we are st the center of the universe is that ..... 
> 
> hbar sets the “Radius of Causality” at 13.8880509 Billion Light Years from where ever your view originates. 
> 
> We are always at “the center of causality” but not the center of the universe as it has no relationship to the center of an individuals locality. 
> 
> The universe may be spatial infinite or not, it doesn’t matter as long as our radius of causality does not actually contact the edge of the universe 
> 
> 
> ((((1 * (m^3)) / s) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) / (6.5248935 * ((m kg) / s))) * c)) / (0.5pi)) = hbar 
> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H92tB6d7Z-5IevkQmzvuTO5OooPlNoH4etv9e23-dcE 
> 

This is gibberish. 

Sylvia. 

You will automatically reject “this truth” because your brain is infected with the “Aether-less Minkowski Brain Virus”

https://youtu.be/FDq-lQr67Mc

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480524

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-26 04:43 -0800
Message-ID<607d9d82-c51d-44ff-9ca5-9ee1d9540b5f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480523
Sylvia Else escrito 

My view as to why we always have the view that we are st the center of the universe is that ..... 

hbar sets the “Radius of Causality” at 13.8880509 Billion Light Years from where ever your view originates. 

We are always at “the center of causality” but not the center of the universe as it has no relationship to the center of an individuals locality. 

The universe may be spatial infinite or not, it doesn’t matter as long as our radius of causality does not actually contact the edge of the universe 


((((1 * (m^3)) / s) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) / (6.5248935 * ((m kg) / s))) * c)) / (0.5pi)) = hbar 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H92tB6d7Z-5IevkQmzvuTO5OooPlNoH4etv9e23-dcE 


A photon at Planck Temp can travel 13.8880509 billion years before being unable to perform useful work 

1.70377849e+53 kg * (((70406.791856 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) * (planck length / (2pi))) = 1.00000000 m kg/s 


((((1 * (m^3)) / s) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) / (6.5248935 * ((m kg) / s))) * c)) / (0.5pi)) = hbar 

((((1.70377849e+53 kg) * (1 kg)) / (6.80566761e-12 * kgf)) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) * pi)^2)) * G = 1 


(8m^3/s/2)/((2pi*hbar)*c^2/(6.5248935 (kg m/s*c))) = (13.8880509 billion light years) 


((((2pi) * ((kg m) / s))^2)  / ((1.70377849e+53 kg)  * ((67798.6423 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc))) = hbar 

Mass universe & Hubble & hbar 


This is gibberish. 

Sylvia. 

You will automatically reject “this truth” because your brain is infected with the “Aether-less Minkowski Brain Virus” 

https://youtu.be/FDq-lQr67Mc

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480525

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-26 05:09 -0800
Message-ID<ca4eb3f1-919e-4497-8dce-5ffe6c1a2e05@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480524
Sylvia Else,

It is the “Same Physical Relationship” that cyclotrons Use to Accelerate Particles 

https://photos.app.goo.gl/ArvmpsQCpqttfRXx8

https://youtu.be/FDq-lQr67Mc

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480526

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-26 05:16 -0800
Message-ID<ed229189-86bc-42f5-b3ac-db40632cf7a1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480525
Sylvia Else, 

It is the “Same Physical Relationship” that cyclotrons Use to Accelerate Particles 

https://photos.app.goo.gl/ArvmpsQCpqttfRXx8 

https://youtu.be/FDq-lQr67Mc 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EppqqfyAJbEVp8Nk82Q5rC5i_VqnLuDhNJIVIEM9Yk0


((acoustic ohms)/( ohms))^0.5 = Coulombs/meter^3 

(acoustic ohms) = (mass)/(length)^4/(time)

((1.8755459e-18 Coulombs/(planck length)^3)^2 * 29.9792458 Ohms )/(c^7/(hbar*G^2))*((Planck length)^3/(Planck length/c)) = 1

((5.91643087e+174 *(1e-5 acoustic ohms) ))*(1 / (((((1.70377849e+53 kg) * (c^2)) / (4 (m^2))) / joules)^0.5))^6/hbar = 1

1.70377849e+53 kg = mass universe 

(((((5.91643087e+174 *(1e-5 acoustic ohms) ))*(2/c)^6/hbar )))^(1/3) = 1.70377849e+53 s^2/m^4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480527

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-26 05:44 -0800
Message-ID<f05d3d2a-ba40-4e74-9370-c232ec13e739@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480526
1/(5.91643087e+174 *(1e-5 acoustic ohms) ) = Acoustic Conductance 

The Aether has a near perfect acoustic conductance just like the Aether-less Minkowski model  


 ((5.91643087e+174 (kg/s/m^4))*((planck length)^6 = hbar

(((2 (m^3)) / s) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) / (6.5248935 ((m kg) / s))) * c)) / pi = 1.0545718e-34 m2 kg / s


(((2 (m^3)) / s) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) / (6.5248935 ((m kg) / s))) * c)) / pi =  ((5.91643087e+174 (kg/s/m^4))*((planck length)^6 




((((1.70377849e+53 kg) * (1 kg)) / (6.80566761e-12 * kgf)) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) * pi)^2)) * G = 1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480528

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-26 05:51 -0800
Message-ID<c19a0ae4-21e7-48fb-af6a-a18513c74ca5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480527
Perfect acoustic conductance would result in a photon that would DISOBEY Hubble Redshift 

The “Only Near Perfect” acoustic conductance results in an extinction limit & “a Spherical Causality Radius” of 13.888 billion light years for a photon emitted at Planck Temperature

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480529

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-26 06:30 -0800
Message-ID<ac2e6db8-cec0-4924-8a73-6333c28241df@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480528
(c / ((1.41793758e32 kelvin) / (13.8880509 billion light years))) / ((6.5248935 * ((kg m) / s))^3) = 1 m^-1 kg^-3 s^2 K^-1

1.41793758e32 / 1.416808e32 = 1.00079727105

https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?plktmp

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480541

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Date2018-12-27 08:56 +1100
Message-ID<g8ibopFhajnU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#480523
On 26/12/2018 11:39 pm, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> Sylvia Else escrito
> 
> On 26/12/2018 5:57 am, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
>> My view as to why we always have the view that we are st the center of the universe is that .....
>>
>> hbar sets the “Radius of Causality” at 13.8880509 Billion Light Years from where ever your view originates.
>>
>> We are always at “the center of causality” but not the center of the universe as it has no relationship to the center of an individuals locality.
>>
>> The universe may be spatial infinite or not, it doesn’t matter as long as our radius of causality does not actually contact the edge of the universe
>>
>>
>> ((((1 * (m^3)) / s) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) / (6.5248935 * ((m kg) / s))) * c)) / (0.5pi)) = hbar
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H92tB6d7Z-5IevkQmzvuTO5OooPlNoH4etv9e23-dcE
>>
> 
> This is gibberish.
> 
> Sylvia.
> 
> You will automatically reject “this truth” because your brain is infected with the “Aether-less Minkowski Brain Virus”
> 
> https://youtu.be/FDq-lQr67Mc
> 
> 
> 

I'm not rejecting a truth. My criticism is not that I believe that you 
are mistaken, but that what you're writing is meaningless. It is, as I 
said, gibberish.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480542

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-26 14:03 -0800
Message-ID<7e1bdc20-04a8-4ebb-82b1-da2b46a81d77@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480541
Sylvia Else escrito 

On 26/12/2018 11:39 pm, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: 
> Sylvia Else escrito 
> 
> On 26/12/2018 5:57 am, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: 
>> My view as to why we always have the view that we are st the center of the universe is that ..... 
>> 
>> hbar sets the “Radius of Causality” at 13.8880509 Billion Light Years from where ever your view originates. 
>> 
>> We are always at “the center of causality” but not the center of the universe as it has no relationship to the center of an individuals locality. 
>> 
>> The universe may be spatial infinite or not, it doesn’t matter as long as our radius of causality does not actually contact the edge of the universe 
>> 
>> 
>> ((((1 * (m^3)) / s) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) / (6.5248935 * ((m kg) / s))) * c)) / (0.5pi)) = hbar 
>> 
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H92tB6d7Z-5IevkQmzvuTO5OooPlNoH4etv9e23-dcE 
>> 
> 
> This is gibberish. 
> 
> Sylvia. 
> 
> You will automatically reject “this truth” because your brain is infected with the “Aether-less Minkowski Brain Virus” 
> 
> https://youtu.be/FDq-lQr67Mc 
> 
> 
> 

I'm not rejecting a truth. My criticism is not that I believe that you 
are mistaken, but that what you're writing is meaningless. It is, as I 
said, gibberish. 

Sylvia. 

A more accurate statement from you is you do not understand it’s “ meaning”

((acoustic ohms)/( ohms))^0.5 = Coulombs/meter^3 

(acoustic ohms) = (mass)/(length)^4/(time)


((1.8755459e-18 Coulombs/(planck length)^3)^2 * 29.9792458 Ohms )/(c^7/(hbar*G^2))*((Planck length)^3/(Planck length/c)) = 1

Acoustic Ohms in Planck Units is Valid.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480543

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-26 14:09 -0800
Message-ID<c5942f79-91d2-4a2f-926c-30217d9cd85f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480542
Sylvia Else escrito 

On 26/12/2018 11:39 pm, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: 
> Sylvia Else escrito 
> 
> On 26/12/2018 5:57 am, David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: 
>> My view as to why we always have the view that we are st the center of the universe is that ..... 
>> 
>> hbar sets the “Radius of Causality” at 13.8880509 Billion Light Years from where ever your view originates. 
>> 
>> We are always at “the center of causality” but not the center of the universe as it has no relationship to the center of an individuals locality. 
>> 
>> The universe may be spatial infinite or not, it doesn’t matter as long as our radius of causality does not actually contact the edge of the universe 
>> 
>> 
>> ((((1 * (m^3)) / s) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) / (6.5248935 * ((m kg) / s))) * c)) / (0.5pi)) = hbar 
>> 
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1H92tB6d7Z-5IevkQmzvuTO5OooPlNoH4etv9e23-dcE 
>> 
> 
> This is gibberish. 
> 
> Sylvia. 
> 
> You will automatically reject “this truth” because your brain is infected with the “Aether-less Minkowski Brain Virus” 
> 
> https://youtu.be/FDq-lQr67Mc 
> 
> 
> 

I'm not rejecting a truth. My criticism is not that I believe that you 
are mistaken, but that what you're writing is meaningless. It is, as I 
said, gibberish. 

Sylvia. 

A more accurate statement from you is you do not understand it’s “ meaning” 

((acoustic ohms)/( ohms))^0.5 = Coulombs/meter^3 

(acoustic ohms) = (mass)/(length)^4/(time) 


((1.8755459e-18 Coulombs/(planck length)^3)^2 * 29.9792458 Ohms )/(c^7/(hbar*G^2))*((Planck length)^3/(Planck length/c)) = 1 

Acoustic Ohms in Planck Units is Valid. 

Minkowski Geometry & Lorentz only produces a photon that travels eternally & no Hubble Redshift

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480544

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-26 15:00 -0800
Message-ID<58765872-bb59-4154-8dd9-0cb13d22625a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480543
((13.8880509 billion years) * ((67798.6421 (m / s)) / (1 Mpc))) * ((6.5248935 ((kg m) / s)) / (2pi)) = 1 m kg / s

(1.70377849e+53 kg * ((((67798.6421 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) * hbar) / ((2pi)^2)))^0.5 = 1 m kg / s

(Mass universe  * ((((67798.6421 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) * hbar) / ((2pi)^2)))^0.5 = 1 m kg / s



Bekenstein Hawking Entropy balanced by Mass universe

c * ((((planck length * 0.5)^3) / (Planck Time * 0.5)) * 1.70377849e+53 (kg^(-1))) = 1 m^4 kg^-1 s^-2  

 ((m^2) / c) / (((planck length * 0.5)^3) / ((planck time) * 0.5)) = 1.70377849e53

Bekenstein Hawking Entropy  = Sbh = A/(4*(Planck Length)^2) 

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Bekenstein-Hawking_entropy#Formula_for_black_hole_entropy 


(4/c / ((Planck Length)^3/(PlanckTime)) = 1.70377849e+53

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480545

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-26 15:29 -0800
Message-ID<0c187047-4ed3-4409-a04d-199545385b71@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480544
((13.8880509 billion years) * ((67798.6421 (m / s)) / (1 Mpc))) * ((6.5248935 ((kg m) / s)) / (2pi)) = 1 m kg / s 

(1.70377849e+53 kg * ((((67798.6421 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) * hbar) / ((2pi)^2)))^0.5 = 1 m kg / s 

(Mass universe  * ((((67798.6421 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) * hbar) / ((2pi)^2)))^0.5 = 1 m kg / s 



Bekenstein Hawking Entropy balanced by Mass universe 

c * ((((planck length * 0.5)^3) / (Planck Time * 0.5)) * 1.70377849e+53 (kg^(-1))) = 1 m^4 kg^-1 s^-2   

 ((m^2) / c) / (((planck length * 0.5)^3) / ((planck time) * 0.5)) = 1.70377849e53 

Bekenstein Hawking Entropy  = Sbh = A/(4*(Planck Length)^2) 

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Bekenstein-Hawking_entropy#Formula_for_black_hole_entropy 


(4/c / ((Planck Length)^3/(PlanckTime)) = 1.70377849e+53 


Orbit force Formula = ((((1.70377849e+53 kg) * (1 kg)) / (6.80566761e-12 * kgf)) / (((13.8880509 billion light years) * pi)^2)) * G = 1

((((((c^4) / G) / (6.80566761e-12 * kgf)) / 1.70377849e+53) / (pi^2))^0.5) * (2pi) = 6.52489349 

(((((Planck Force) / (6.80566761e-12 * kgf)) / (Mass Universe)) / (pi^2))^0.5) * (2pi) = 6.52489349 

6.80566761e-12 * kgf = 6.67408003e-11 newtons

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#480547

From"David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com>
Date2018-12-26 16:20 -0800
Message-ID<fde79b46-bd8b-49ed-a0d6-e5ae62f4758b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#480545
(((((67798.6421 * (m / s)) / (1 Mpc)) )*(planck Length/c)))*1.70377849e+53 joules) = 125.966544 GeV


((((2pi) / 6.5248935) * ((kg m) / s)) / (125.9665445 GeV)) * (2pi) = 299792458 s / m

((((2pi) / 6.5248935) * ((kg m) / s)) / (125.9665445 GeV)) * (2pi) = 299792458 s / m



https://arxiv.org/pdf/1305.1649.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web