Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #426345 > unrolled thread
| Started by | mlwozniak@wp.pl |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-27 12:15 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-08-01 23:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 5 on this page of 25 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
OK, so what is acceleration? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-27 12:15 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? Ernard Hevalier <adrdo@tarlaab.lr> - 2017-07-27 19:19 +0000
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 12:21 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-27 12:26 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 12:35 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-27 13:12 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 14:08 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-27 23:07 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 13:11 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? Ernard Hevalier <adrdo@tarlaab.lr> - 2017-07-28 20:14 +0000
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 13:59 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-29 01:00 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 13:51 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-07-31 21:25 +0000
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 15:15 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-07-31 22:27 +0000
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 16:05 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-31 23:19 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-01 14:03 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-01 23:27 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? Ernard Hevalier <adrdo@tarlaab.lr> - 2017-07-28 20:06 +0000
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 15:18 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-07-29 01:49 -0700
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-07-31 16:38 +0200
Re: OK, so what is acceleration? "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-08-01 23:45 -0700
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Ernard Hevalier <adrdo@tarlaab.lr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-28 20:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <olg5gj$1trd$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #426372 |
JanPB wrote: >> Don't you have to remove offensive language directed at something you >> don't understand? > > The moron himself need not be convinced of it, it's one of those little > paradoxes in life. Okay, let's abolish the offensive. You may not even use satire. Satire is offensive.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-31 15:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3541647e-3653-45c4-bb5e-eaeff6c20f7d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426465 |
On Friday, July 28, 2017 at 1:06:48 PM UTC-7, Ernard Hevalier wrote: > JanPB wrote: > > >> Don't you have to remove offensive language directed at something you > >> don't understand? > > > > The moron himself need not be convinced of it, it's one of those little > > paradoxes in life. > > Okay, let's abolish the offensive. You may not even use satire. Satire is > offensive. I simply call his bluff. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-29 01:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d263c93f-a802-45ff-9451-df565245c57b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426345 |
On Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 12:15:18 PM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > Some idiots here insist that "acceleration" > is no longer the rate of change of velocity > of an object with respect to time. > What is it then according to modern physics > and The Shit of great Einstein? It's velocity that's constant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-31 16:38 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <eu8tn3FhdfU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #426345 |
Am 27.07.2017 um 21:15 schrieb mlwozniak@wp.pl: > Some idiots here insist that "acceleration" > is no longer the rate of change of velocity > of an object with respect to time. > What is it then according to modern physics > and The Shit of great Einstein? > 'what is' is not really the right question. We - as human beings - define, what we want to express with a certain word or phrase. Some humans do not agree to some of the definitions, but that's no big deal, since the majority (in this case of the physicists) decides, what should be expressed with e.g. the tern 'acceleration'. I would say, your definition is roughly correct, but other words and/or symbols are possible as well, as long as the same concept is meant. TH
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-08-01 23:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <33812d8f-1474-4894-b0bb-43a180c8caf5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426345 |
On Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 2:15:18 PM UTC-5, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > Some idiots here insist that "acceleration" > is no longer the rate of change of velocity > of an object with respect to time. > What is it then according to modern physics > and The Shit of great Einstein? A Change in Entropy
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web