Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #425054 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-15 18:57 +0000 |
| Last post | 2017-07-22 17:58 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 148 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 18:57 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 19:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 19:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-15 20:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-16 00:49 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-17 22:34 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:53 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:49 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-07-16 12:24 +1000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-16 11:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-16 11:18 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-16 12:35 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 10:07 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:09 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 13:24 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 19:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 18:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:48 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:56 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:50 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-07-17 22:37 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 13:26 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:09 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:51 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:01 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 14:33 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 20:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 23:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:03 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:23 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 00:00 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:04 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:03 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 12:38 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:44 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 12:47 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:54 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:25 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 21:19 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:22 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 16:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 17:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 17:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-18 15:36 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-18 21:36 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-19 20:21 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:32 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-20 16:52 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 14:58 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:52 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:49 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 19:13 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:03 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:53 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:53 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:57 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-07-16 20:35 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-07-16 21:19 +0200
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 19:30 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 16:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:14 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 02:02 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 02:02 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:21 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 10:59 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:17 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 15:55 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:09 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:58 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:01 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:22 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:33 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:04 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 19:25 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 17:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 22:19 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 01:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:41 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:34 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:05 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 16:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:56 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Ustin Veterre <utve@nauoe.ct> - 2017-07-17 22:06 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 18:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:27 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:58 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 18:26 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-16 18:47 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-16 17:01 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-17 00:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 08:43 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> - 2017-07-17 15:35 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-17 11:06 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-17 16:59 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 18:15 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 00:02 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-17 22:35 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-18 04:05 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 20:04 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 01:15 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-19 21:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-19 21:23 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 03:42 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 11:29 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-20 17:27 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 19:17 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 00:15 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 21:20 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 01:41 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2017-07-21 09:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-15 21:46 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-16 02:13 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 05:49 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 15:26 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 12:45 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 17:10 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 13:43 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 18:07 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 15:10 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 19:32 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 17:32 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2017-07-21 22:11 +0000
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2017-07-22 10:51 -0400
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 17:55 -0500
Re: Question about power capacity of electrical motors. Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-07-22 17:58 -0500
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 00:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596c41ae$0$21689$b1db1813$65575428@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425195 |
On 07/16/2017 02:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Serg io wrote: > >>>> wrong. It costs too much. It is used in some high power tuning >>>> components in RF and microwave. Many connectors are silver plated to >>>> reduce losses. most silver corrosion does not effect performance. >>> >>> That's alloys, not silver. Stay cool. >> >> no, it is silver. they tarnish > > Shut up, you know nothing, just moving your lips. > plumer ignorance is absolutely record-setting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 14:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okij7i$11hn$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425261 |
benj wrote: > On 07/16/2017 02:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >> Serg io wrote: >> >>>>> wrong. It costs too much. It is used in some high power tuning >>>>> components in RF and microwave. Many connectors are silver plated to >>>>> reduce losses. most silver corrosion does not effect performance. >>>> >>>> That's alloys, not silver. Stay cool. >>> >>> no, it is silver. they tarnish >> >> Shut up, you know nothing, just moving your lips. >> > plumer ignorance is absolutely record-setting. You mean yours, surpassing jimp and morony by many lengths. And Serg, you are more stupid than him too. What a moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 10:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okimcm$1854$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425305 |
On 7/17/2017 9:56 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > benj wrote: > >> On 07/16/2017 02:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>> Serg io wrote: >>> >>>>>> wrong. It costs too much. It is used in some high power tuning >>>>>> components in RF and microwave. Many connectors are silver plated to >>>>>> reduce losses. most silver corrosion does not effect performance. >>>>> >>>>> That's alloys, not silver. Stay cool. >>>> >>>> no, it is silver. they tarnish >>> >>> Shut up, you know nothing, just moving your lips. >>> >> plumer ignorance is absolutely record-setting. > > You mean yours, surpassing jimp and morony by many lengths. And Serg, you > are more stupid than him too. What a moron. > so, how do you know anyone is moving their lips ? Remote Viewing ? don't be shy, we are ready...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 22:37 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1763282.usQuhbGJ8B@PointedEars.de> |
| In reply to | #425261 |
benj wrote: > On 07/16/2017 02:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >> Serg io wrote: >>>>> wrong. It costs too much. It is used in some high power tuning >>>>> components in RF and microwave. Many connectors are silver plated to >>>>> reduce losses. most silver corrosion does not effect performance. >>>> >>>> That's alloys, not silver. Stay cool. >>> >>> no, it is silver. they tarnish >> >> Shut up, you know nothing, just moving your lips. >> > plumer ignorance is absolutely record-setting. It’s the ’nym-shifting troll. What do you expect? -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 18:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okga3l$1hls$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425138 |
Michael Moroney wrote: > Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used > only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, silver nowhere. And copper is less corrosive than silver. Pure silver let alone corrodes in a matter of hours, then its electrical characteristics degrades rapidly jeopardising all circuitry, especially HF. You and your friend Sylvia are uneducated cretins. Dr. Garfield is consistent in his treatise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 13:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okgb4g$1kvg$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425181 |
On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Michael Moroney wrote: > >> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. > > Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, very little use in electronics, too expensive. > silver nowhere. Wrong. > And copper is > less corrosive than silver. Pure silver let alone corrodes in a matter of > hours, then its electrical characteristics degrades rapidly jeopardising > all circuitry, especially HF. totally wrong. I don't have time to educate you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 18:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okgbms$1ksj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425187 |
Serg io wrote: > On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >> Michael Moroney wrote: >> >>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >> >> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, > > very little use in electronics, too expensive. serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are plated in gold. Please shut up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-16 16:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okgnd7$9qh$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425194 |
On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Serg io wrote: > >> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>> >>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>> >>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >> >> very little use in electronics, too expensive. > > serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD > defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are > plated in gold. Please shut up. > wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated in gold, you are looking at gold laquer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 01:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596c4678$0$18977$b1db1813$19ace300@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425222 |
On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: > On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >> Serg io wrote: >> >>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>> >>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>> >>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>> >>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >> >> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >> plated in gold. Please shut up. >> > > wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated > in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more correct your posts become.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 14:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okijdc$11hn$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425264 |
benj wrote: >> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. > > PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge > connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the > worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more > correct your posts become. You are an imbecile, sir. Can't make it shorter.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 10:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okime6$1854$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425307 |
On 7/17/2017 9:59 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote:
> benj wrote:
>
>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated
>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer.
>>
>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge
>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the
>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more
>> correct your posts become.
>
> You are an imbecile, sir. Can't make it shorter.
>
wrong, watch....
You are an imbecile, sir.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Winfred Plumer <lewru@pulwr.cn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 16:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okin1h$11ho$15@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425326 |
Serg io wrote: > On 7/17/2017 9:59 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >> benj wrote: >> >>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not >>>> plated in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>> >>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>> correct your posts become. >> >> You are an imbecile, sir. Can't make it shorter. > > wrong, watch.... You are an imbecile, sir. I beg you to reconsider. You are the guy hating, being incapable to read a datasheet. Unemployable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 11:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okiqec$1f19$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425337 |
On 7/17/2017 11:01 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: > Serg io wrote: > >> On 7/17/2017 9:59 AM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>> benj wrote: >>> >>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not >>>>> plated in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>> >>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>> correct your posts become. >>> >>> You are an imbecile, sir. Can't make it shorter. >> >> wrong, watch.... You are an imbecile, sir. > > I beg you to reconsider. You are the guy hating, being incapable to read a > datasheet. Unemployable. > no, I was only shortening your previous statement. If unemployable, you can collect Social Security Disability
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 16:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2k6v3e-s4g.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #425264 |
In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>> Serg io wrote: >>> >>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>> >>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>> >>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>> >>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>> >> >> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. > > PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge > connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the > worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more > correct your posts become. You can not plate solder. PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to the copper. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 14:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <okj3ej$1ved$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #425354 |
On 7/17/2017 11:52 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>> Serg io wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>> >>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>> >>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>> >>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >> >> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >> correct your posts become. > > You can not plate solder. > > PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to > the copper. > its called wave soldering, most everybody does it. I knew a guy that tried to grab a board that sank into the wave, and dipped his hand in it, pulled it out real fast but he had burns. Gold plating is also avoided due to the chemicals needed to support that process, a while back the EPA put the chomp on many of them,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 20:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cshv3e-tch.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #425370 |
In sci.physics Serg io <invaalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 7/17/2017 11:52 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it is used >>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>> >>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>> >>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my PCBs are >>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. > >>>> >>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>> >>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>> correct your posts become. >> >> You can not plate solder. >> >> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >> the copper. >> > > its called wave soldering, most everybody does it. No shit? > I knew a guy that > tried to grab a board that sank into the wave, and dipped his hand in > it, pulled it out real fast but he had burns. > > Gold plating is also avoided due to the chemicals needed to support that > process, a while back the EPA put the chomp on many of them, That and gold is $1,233.40 an ounce while tin is about $9.00 a pound. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 18:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596d35c2$0$34552$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425370 |
On 7/17/2017 3:33 PM, Serg io wrote: > On 7/17/2017 11:52 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it >>>>>>>> is used >>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>> >>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>> >>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my >>>>> PCBs are >>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. > >>>> >>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>> >>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>> correct your posts become. >> >> You can not plate solder. >> >> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >> the copper. >> > > its called wave soldering, most everybody does it. I knew a guy that > tried to grab a board that sank into the wave, and dipped his hand in > it, pulled it out real fast but he had burns. > > Gold plating is also avoided due to the chemicals needed to support that > process, a while back the EPA put the chomp on many of them, > Chimp as usual shows his ignorance of all things technical. When contact fingers are not gold plated they are solder plated. And yes, I used to have two 5 gallon containers of one each lead fluoroborate and Tin Fluoroborate which are the two main chemicals for solder plating. Luckily I sold them before the EPA put the chomp on me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 23:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9jvv3e-kri.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #425392 |
In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 7/17/2017 3:33 PM, Serg io wrote: >> On 7/17/2017 11:52 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it >>>>>>>>> is used >>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>> >>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my >>>>>> PCBs are >>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >> >>>>> >>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>> >>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>> correct your posts become. >>> >>> You can not plate solder. >>> >>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>> the copper. >>> >> >> its called wave soldering, most everybody does it. I knew a guy that >> tried to grab a board that sank into the wave, and dipped his hand in >> it, pulled it out real fast but he had burns. >> >> Gold plating is also avoided due to the chemicals needed to support that >> process, a while back the EPA put the chomp on many of them, >> > Chimp as <snip> The troll continues to seek attention, starting with an ad hominem. The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 22:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <596d7364$0$11353$b1db1813$e2fc9064@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425405 |
On 7/17/2017 7:59 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 7/17/2017 3:33 PM, Serg io wrote: >>> On 7/17/2017 11:52 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it >>>>>>>>>> is used >>>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my >>>>>>> PCBs are >>>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>>> >>>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>>> correct your posts become. >>>> >>>> You can not plate solder. >>>> >>>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>>> the copper. >>>> >>> >>> its called wave soldering, most everybody does it. I knew a guy that >>> tried to grab a board that sank into the wave, and dipped his hand in >>> it, pulled it out real fast but he had burns. >>> >>> Gold plating is also avoided due to the chemicals needed to support that >>> process, a while back the EPA put the chomp on many of them, >>> >> Chimp as <snip> > > The troll continues to seek attention, starting with an ad hominem. > > The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: > > "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" > Chimp is right on the money again. I actually was lying when I said he said something that was right.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 04:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <etd04e-5ck.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #425416 |
In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 7/17/2017 7:59 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 7/17/2017 3:33 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>> On 7/17/2017 11:52 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics benj <nobody@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 07/16/2017 05:55 PM, Serg io wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:36 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>> Serg io wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 7/16/2017 1:08 PM, Winfred Plumer wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Gold is an even worse conductor and even more expensive, so it >>>>>>>>>>> is used >>>>>>>>>>> only where its superior corrosion resistance is necessary. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cretin. Gold is used everywhere nowadays, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> very little use in electronics, too expensive. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> serg idiot, all PCBs tracks, vias, pads etc are in gold. Even your OLD >>>>>>>> defect logic/motherboard is worth at least $50+ in gold. All my >>>>>>>> PCBs are >>>>>>>> plated in gold. Please shut up. >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrong. I was in the business and know better. Lands are not plated >>>>>>> in gold, you are looking at gold laquer. >>>>>> >>>>>> PC boards are solder plated (an alloy! Duh!) Only fingers of edge >>>>>> connectors are gold plated for corrosion resistance. Winfred is the >>>>>> worst kind of moron. The thinks that the louder you talk the more >>>>>> correct your posts become. >>>>> >>>>> You can not plate solder. >>>>> >>>>> PC boards are covered by dipping them in molten solder which sticks to >>>>> the copper. >>>>> >>>> >>>> its called wave soldering, most everybody does it. I knew a guy that >>>> tried to grab a board that sank into the wave, and dipped his hand in >>>> it, pulled it out real fast but he had burns. >>>> >>>> Gold plating is also avoided due to the chemicals needed to support that >>>> process, a while back the EPA put the chomp on many of them, >>>> >>> Chimp as <snip> >> >> The troll continues to seek attention, starting with an ad hominem. >> >> The only thing the troll has ever posted worth reading: >> >> "Sorry, Looperji, but while I do love to troll and lie" >> > Chimp <snip troll drool> The troll seeks attention with the usual ad hominems. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web