Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #422344 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "HGW..." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-06-12 20:18 +1000 |
| Last post | 2017-06-23 21:14 -0700 |
| Articles | 16 on this page of 216 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-12 20:18 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-12 15:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Selina Dieter <uiueeits@wlwtwstd.ci> - 2017-06-12 17:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-06-12 21:57 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? Python <python@example.invalid> - 2017-06-12 18:03 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-12 09:34 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 04:39 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Selina Dieter <uiueeits@wlwtwstd.ci> - 2017-06-12 18:40 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 05:26 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-12 13:57 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-13 05:28 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 15:14 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-13 07:17 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-13 15:16 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-14 08:58 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 10:45 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-14 07:26 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-14 15:00 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 11:30 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 06:15 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 15:48 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 06:54 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 15:56 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-15 01:55 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 20:54 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-15 13:01 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-16 03:41 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Kotovanich Nzerovu <ivhvruo@wovewvw.ev> - 2017-06-15 17:49 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-16 04:28 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 16:44 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? Nými Icelulózy <ejienm@wzsfwe.ul> - 2017-06-16 11:28 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Nými Icelulózy <ejienm@wzsfwe.ul> - 2017-06-16 18:27 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 16:37 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 07:23 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 07:21 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-15 07:25 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 10:24 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:08 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:23 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:28 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:37 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 15:25 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 15:02 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-17 07:35 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-17 11:48 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-17 12:03 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-17 22:21 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-18 04:27 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-06-18 13:52 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-19 05:09 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Rhett Doucet <ttdh@etoe.ee> - 2017-06-19 12:42 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2017-06-19 17:26 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-18 12:32 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-19 05:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-19 12:38 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 13:03 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-19 11:24 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 13:30 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-21 06:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:08 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-22 07:45 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 15:28 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-24 05:46 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-24 17:05 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-24 15:49 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-04 16:06 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-05 02:50 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-07-04 22:58 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-07-05 20:22 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-05 11:08 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-05 11:06 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-05 04:26 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-06 13:19 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Oveho Trofyzikovu <zfeuur@ceuuwi.ku> - 2017-07-05 11:05 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-05 04:20 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-05 12:44 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-19 11:25 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-19 20:26 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-19 16:12 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-21 06:23 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:10 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-22 09:00 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-22 01:16 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 15:29 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-22 01:56 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-22 12:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-22 05:49 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-22 06:54 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-22 15:58 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-23 09:30 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2017-06-23 09:18 +0200
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-23 23:34 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-25 09:26 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-25 00:55 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Julianna Eliason <nujasenea@wiwnwajau.nc> - 2017-06-18 14:20 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-18 08:45 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Julianna Eliason <nujasenea@wiwnwajau.nc> - 2017-06-18 15:47 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-18 16:10 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-18 16:08 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Julianna Eliason <nujasenea@wiwnwajau.nc> - 2017-06-18 16:54 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-18 03:15 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Nými Icelulózy <ejienm@wzsfwe.ul> - 2017-06-16 13:52 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-15 07:21 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 10:23 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:05 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:21 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-06-16 15:44 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 11:14 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-16 06:23 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-16 08:26 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-06-16 08:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-17 15:02 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-17 11:56 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-06-14 09:21 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-14 07:12 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW, DSc." <HG@....> - 2017-06-15 06:34 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-06-14 10:17 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 23:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:49 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-16 00:57 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:51 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-13 23:59 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-15 08:23 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-14 18:50 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:38 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-17 08:25 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-17 02:10 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 07:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-18 08:53 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-18 05:52 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-18 14:50 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-19 09:48 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-19 01:42 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-19 19:33 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-19 19:45 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-20 08:14 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-20 08:42 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-21 14:37 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-21 19:18 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-22 08:15 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 15:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-21 21:18 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-22 03:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-23 07:00 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 02:16 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 20:07 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 20:39 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 10:19 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-26 12:12 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 13:21 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-27 19:58 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:39 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-27 16:25 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 10:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 13:01 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-27 11:53 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:35 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-27 13:11 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:38 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-28 03:54 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 19:35 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-08-04 00:04 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-28 09:48 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-28 13:54 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2017-07-29 00:46 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-30 09:04 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-30 23:17 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-07-31 10:40 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:08 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-01 09:57 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 03:11 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-02 08:31 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Jeèným Ludnými <hovae@ieuuio.org> - 2017-08-02 09:04 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 11:00 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-03 07:15 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 10:27 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-04 11:48 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 02:34 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 09:01 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 14:42 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-01 03:02 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-01 13:57 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-01 10:43 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? "HGW..." <hgw@....> - 2017-08-01 09:56 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:08 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 19:33 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-22 02:49 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-23 08:43 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? shuba <thailao2558@gmail.com> - 2017-07-14 19:46 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 02:12 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-15 02:14 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Garfield Dieter <igdle@rdlge.rf> - 2017-07-15 10:41 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 08:27 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-15 09:05 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-16 21:39 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-16 22:16 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-17 00:08 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 08:00 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-07-17 09:39 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-18 21:18 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2017-07-20 14:47 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-07-20 19:16 -0400
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-21 12:59 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 07:51 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-07-17 07:45 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-17 20:02 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com - 2017-07-17 20:19 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-20 11:39 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Lipek Mniak <iluka@sskwpiw.pp> - 2017-06-21 11:43 +0000
Re: What Happened to Seto? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-21 23:10 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-21 06:28 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-21 11:06 -0500
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-22 07:50 -0700
Re: What Happened to Seto? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-06-24 11:11 +1000
Re: What Happened to Seto? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2017-06-23 21:14 -0700
Page 11 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11]
| From | gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-18 21:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b68763dc-64e0-4bc2-87ff-1f938b2a3423@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425308 |
On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 8:30:15 PM UTC+5:30, kenseto wrote: > On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 3:08:49 AM UTC-4, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 10:46:31 AM UTC+5:30, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 9:39:21 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com asked: > > > > > > > ...In the meantime post one review from a kind mainstream scientist? > > > > > > Don't hold your breath, there aren't any, and there won't be any... > > > > Why not, I mean someone could at least look at it and point out its errors (if any) . It will be a learning experience. Also, chapter 5 describes an experiment to test the theory. At least criticize the experiment. > > Scientists refuse to comment because of the following reasons: > 1. Embarrassment > 2. Don’t rock the gravy boat. > 3. Money. > 4. Afraid that it will catch on and spread like wild fire. > > You can bet that scientists would point out any major flaws if they find any.....they can’t and that’s why the silence. All these reasons are plausible and I am sure many of us would accept that they happen. Did you see what happened to the faster than light neutrino experiment? They called a panel and publicly humiliated the experimenters after they retracted the results. So don't do it again. Reason (4) I am not so sure is valid, after all there are many theories out there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-20 14:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8e0e68fe-6583-465e-b5c8-dada64258168@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425308 |
On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 8:00:15 AM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > Scientists refuse to comment because of the following reasons: > 1. Embarrassment > 2. Don’t rock the gravy boat. > 3. Money. > 4. Afraid that it will catch on and spread like wild fire. Cranks always say that, it's their beloved little dream, fabricated in order to maintain their ego. This fabrication BTW betrays at once that you've never been anywhere near real academic/scientific workplace. So here is what happens in the real world: 1. "Embarrassment" No. The reason is simply that scientists get TONS of pure gobbledygook (like yours) 24/7 and it's simply impossible to address the errors, even assuming the cranks would ever admit making a mistake (which is something they NEVER EVER do - another trait absent in real science). 2. "Don’t rock the gravy boat" That's the standard Hollywood line. The truth again is that the first person to disprove some major physics theory will get showered by both prizes and excellent job offers from all over the world. There is no "gravy" is frantic maintaining the status quo. 3. "Money" See above. The real money is in DISPROVING the status quo, not in maintaining it. This is something cranks cannot comprehend for some reason. 4. "Afraid that it will catch on and spread like wild fire" A typical crank ego-booster again. They are not "afraid" of anything like that because they KNOW it's all crank-junk. There is no need to spend even a fraction of a second on any "defense". Keep in mind that the ONLY reason some people who do know their stuff post here in the first place is not "defending" anything but simply ENTERTAINMENT. -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-20 19:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <597139e1$0$53094$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #425714 |
On 7/20/2017 5:47 PM, JanPB wrote: > On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 8:00:15 AM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: >> >> Scientists refuse to comment because of the following reasons: >> 1. Embarrassment >> 2. Don’t rock the gravy boat. >> 3. Money. >> 4. Afraid that it will catch on and spread like wild fire. > > Cranks always say that, it's their beloved little dream, fabricated in order > to maintain their ego. This fabrication BTW betrays at once that you've never > been anywhere near real academic/scientific workplace. > > So here is what happens in the real world: > > 1. "Embarrassment" > No. The reason is simply that scientists get TONS of pure gobbledygook > (like yours) 24/7 and it's simply impossible to address the errors, even > assuming the cranks would ever admit making a mistake (which is something > they NEVER EVER do - another trait absent in real science). Above is basically scientist propaganda in the same class as journalists boldly declaring how honest they are and how much integrity they all have while lying their asses off to get a "good story'. Scientists never admit mistakes. IF they can they try to cover them up (like killing papers pointing them out) and ef eventually backed into a corner where the mistake cannot be denied they simply switch their opinions 180 degrees and swear they NEVER said the old way and " everybody knows" the new way is right! Mistake simply disappears. > 2. "Don’t rock the gravy boat" > That's the standard Hollywood line. The truth again is that the first > person to disprove some major physics theory will get showered by both > prizes and excellent job offers from all over the world. There is no > "gravy" is frantic maintaining the status quo. Obviously there is science and then there is science politics. Discovering some new thing (say cold fusion) will just get denial and resistance. Even with tenure chances of getting fired are excellent. Only new discovoceries allowed without a fight are empty spots in handbook tables. Even worse is political based science. Like say "global warming". IF you aren't ready to support the politics then the gravy train gets cut off. If course supporting some political agenda goes totally against what science is about, but money are career say it all. > 3. "Money" > See above. The real money is in DISPROVING the status quo, not in > maintaining it. This is something cranks cannot comprehend for some > reason. Nonsense. There is NO money in disproving the accepted status quo. People reward support from others. The further your agenda from reality the greater that support is worth. Support the "right" politics (warming, gun control, you name it) and big salaries are easy. Spout truth and you are out on the street simple as that. > 4. "Afraid that it will catch on and spread like wild fire" > A typical crank ego-booster again. They are not "afraid" of anything > like that because they KNOW it's all crank-junk. There is no need to > spend even a fraction of a second on any "defense". Keep in mind that > the ONLY reason some people who do know their stuff post here in the > first place is not "defending" anything but simply ENTERTAINMENT. Nothing "catches on" and "spreads like wildfire". That is a given. All things that SEEM to catch on and spread "on their own" are in fact, carefully controlled and promoted to achieve various political ends from behind the scenes. If you aren't an insider, and part of the plans, then your ideas are going nowhere. Trust me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-21 12:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0d6a9b1c-aa9c-4238-877a-a530c0edf561@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425714 |
On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 5:47:53 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote: > On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 8:00:15 AM UTC-7, kenseto wrote: > > > > Scientists refuse to comment because of the following reasons: > > 1. Embarrassment > > 2. Don’t rock the gravy boat. > > 3. Money. > > 4. Afraid that it will catch on and spread like wild fire. > > Cranks always say that, it's their beloved little dream, fabricated in order > to maintain their ego. This fabrication BTW betrays at once that you've never > been anywhere near real academic/scientific workplace. > So here is what happens in the real world: You are a mathematicians you are not qualified to evaluate physical theories.....you made up stuff like extra dimensions to explain the physical world. > > 1. "Embarrassment" > No. The reason is simply that scientists get TONS of pure gobbledygook > (like yours) 24/7 and it's simply impossible to address the errors, even > assuming the cranks would ever admit making a mistake (which is something > they NEVER EVER do - another trait absent in real science). That’s baloney......most of the so call physicists post here have plenty of time and that’s why they post here. > > 2. "Don’t rock the gravy boat" > That's the standard Hollywood line. The truth again is that the first > person to disprove some major physics theory will get showered by both > prizes and excellent job offers from all over the world. There is no > “gravy" is frantic maintaining the status quo. It is not necessary to disprove some major theory....in Chapter 5 of my book I showed the result of the following past experiments can be interpreted as the result of absolute motion. 1. The photoelectric experiment. 2. The Compton shift experiment. 3. The Double slit experiment. > > 3. "Money" > See above. The real money is in DISPROVING the status quo, not in > maintaining it. This is something cranks cannot comprehend for some > reason. Sure....you get pay for maintaining it. You don’t get pay by saying that there is no extra dimension. > > 4. "Afraid that it will catch on and spread like wild fire" > A typical crank ego-booster again. They are not "afraid" of anything > like that because they KNOW it's all crank-junk. There is no need to > spend even a fraction of a second on any "defense". Keep in mind that > the ONLY reason some people who do know their stuff post here in the > first place is not "defending" anything but simply ENTERTAINMENT. > Yes they are afraid. How do you know it’s all crank-junk? You mathematicians are all cranks and you force the publics to accept your crank belief that there are extra dimensions of space.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 07:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <99c6bf9c-0f41-401d-b617-c2371148cd48@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425265 |
On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 1:16:31 AM UTC-4, pnal...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 9:39:21 PM UTC-7, gehan.am...@gmail.com asked: > > > ...In the meantime post one review from a kind mainstream scientist? > > Don’t hold your breath, there aren't any, and there won't be any... No wonder you failed the Mars Lander mission.....failed to convert English unit to Metric unit. You should give the government back all the salary you received.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 07:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8001950e-f531-4445-9177-785ea43ea03c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425258 |
On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 12:39:21 AM UTC-4, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, July 15, 2017 at 9:35:37 PM UTC+5:30, kenseto wrote: > > On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 2:59:23 AM UTC-4, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 7:47:16 PM UTC+5:30, kenseto wrote: > > > > On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 6:18:33 AM UTC-4, HGW... wrote: > > > > > Maybe he died. Maybe he has changed his nickname because he was so > > > > > ashamed of his theory. > > > > > > > > I am tired of the low level of the intelligence that exists in this NG. I published a new book of the universe (http://www.modelmechanics.org/2016ibook.pdf) that includes the following items......no body in this NG bothers to give any intelligent comment: > > > > > > > > _ It offers a realistic origin of the universe. > > > > _ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. > > > > _ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. > > > > _ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature. > > > > _ It can be validated experimentally. > > > > _ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). > > > > _ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG) > > > > _ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity as subsets. > > > > _ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. > > > > _ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. > > > > _ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. > > > > _ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum experiments. > > > > _ It explains the structures of atoms. > > > > > > Intriguing. Several comments: > > > > > > 1. I do not have the expertise to evaluate your theory > > > 2. There are several possible objections to the theory: > > > > > > a) Philosophical objections > > > > Can you describe the philosophical objections? > > > > > b) Objections based on mathematical inconsistencies > > > > What are the mathematical inconsistencies? The math of IRT is the LT in different forms. > > > > > c) Objections based on logic > > > > I think that Model Mechanics is more logical than current theories. It does not rely on the existence non-existing of mathematical objects or processes such as extra dimensions, length contraction, virtual particles.....etc. > > > > > d) Objects based on negative experimental results. > > > > I have no idea what you are talking about here. > > > > > > In my opinion, you do not have to worry about (a), or (c). Previous theories have survived without these problems. > > > > > > Have you got your theory peer-reviewed for the mathematics? What experimental results does it predict? > > > > Read Chapter 5 of my book. Model Mechanics provide logical explanations for the following past famous experiments: > > 1. The photoelectric experiment. > > 2. The Compton shift experiment. > > 3. The double-slit experiment. > > > > In addition New experiments to detect absolute motion are proposed. > > Will read chapter 5. In the meantime post one review from a kind mainstream scientist? Go to the link fqxi.org.... 1. click on to the 2014 essay contest. 2. click on to find author by last name (seto). 3. find my essay entitled “The Future Development of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology” 4. You will find some favorite comments on my theory. 5. There are other favorite comments on my theory in different essays.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 20:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b552e9fc-a0ef-40c7-a8f6-8b521a84d9f3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425302 |
On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 8:15:48 PM UTC+5:30, kenseto wrote: > On Monday, July 17, 2017 at 12:39:21 AM UTC-4, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Saturday, July 15, 2017 at 9:35:37 PM UTC+5:30, kenseto wrote: > > > On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 2:59:23 AM UTC-4, gehan.am...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 7:47:16 PM UTC+5:30, kenseto wrote: > > > > > On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 6:18:33 AM UTC-4, HGW... wrote: > > > > > > Maybe he died. Maybe he has changed his nickname because he was so > > > > > > ashamed of his theory. > > > > > > > > > > I am tired of the low level of the intelligence that exists in this NG. I published a new book of the universe (http://www.modelmechanics.org/2016ibook.pdf) that includes the following items......no body in this NG bothers to give any intelligent comment: > > > > > > > > > > _ It offers a realistic origin of the universe. > > > > > _ It offers realistic processes for the origin of all visible matters. > > > > > _ It explains the cell division and the consciousness processes. > > > > > _ It provides a mechanism to unify all the forces of nature. > > > > > _ It can be validated experimentally. > > > > > _ It gives rise to an Improved Relativity Theory (IRT). > > > > > _ It gives rise to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG) > > > > > _ It includes Special Theory of Relativity and General Theory of Relativity as subsets. > > > > > _ It provides physical models for all the math of Quantum Mechanics. > > > > > _ It postulates a new repulsive fifth force identified as the CRE force. > > > > > _ It gives a physical explanation for the charge of a particle. > > > > > _ It gives physical explanations all the weird results of all quantum experiments. > > > > > _ It explains the structures of atoms. > > > > > > > > Intriguing. Several comments: > > > > > > > > 1. I do not have the expertise to evaluate your theory > > > > 2. There are several possible objections to the theory: > > > > > > > > a) Philosophical objections > > > > > > Can you describe the philosophical objections? > > > > > > > b) Objections based on mathematical inconsistencies > > > > > > What are the mathematical inconsistencies? The math of IRT is the LT in different forms. > > > > > > > c) Objections based on logic > > > > > > I think that Model Mechanics is more logical than current theories. It does not rely on the existence non-existing of mathematical objects or processes such as extra dimensions, length contraction, virtual particles.....etc. > > > > > > > d) Objects based on negative experimental results. > > > > > > I have no idea what you are talking about here. > > > > > > > > In my opinion, you do not have to worry about (a), or (c). Previous theories have survived without these problems. > > > > > > > > Have you got your theory peer-reviewed for the mathematics? What experimental results does it predict? > > > > > > Read Chapter 5 of my book. Model Mechanics provide logical explanations for the following past famous experiments: > > > 1. The photoelectric experiment. > > > 2. The Compton shift experiment. > > > 3. The double-slit experiment. > > > > > > In addition New experiments to detect absolute motion are proposed. > > > > Will read chapter 5. In the meantime post one review from a kind mainstream scientist? > > Go to the link fqxi.org.... > 1. click on to the 2014 essay contest. > 2. click on to find author by last name (seto). > 3. find my essay entitled “The Future Development of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology” > 4. You will find some favorite comments on my theory. > 5. There are other favorite comments on my theory in different essays. Will have a look. This FXQI has some heavyweights on its advisory board: John Barrow, Professor of Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge University Barrow's research interests are cosmology, the foundations of physics, gravitational and particle physics. Barrow has written a number of popular books on these topics. Nick Bostrom, Director, Oxford Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford University Bostrom's research interests are philosophy of science, ethics, transhumanism, and probability theory. Gregory Chaitin, Researcher, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center Chaitin's research interests include physical and mathematical complexity, algorithmic information theory, metamathematics, and philosophy of science. David Chalmers, Director, Centre for Consciousness & Professor of Philosophy, Australian National University Chalmers' research interests include the philosophy of mind, cognitive science, and the foundations of physics. Patricia M. Gruber, President, Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation Previously a psychotherapist in private practice in California, she now devotes herself full time to the Foundation, which she has guided since its inception in 1993, and has been its full-time president since 2000. Alan Guth, Professor of Physics, MIT Guth's research interests are cosmology and particle physics, especially inflationary theory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gehan.ameresekere@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-17 20:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <eaf0b0a2-771c-4af3-8af9-29a541ea2e6f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #425414 |
I will just have to read it and see. The sections on the history of science are intelligible to me at least. There are a lot of theories out there. I can only point out that some thought experiments used to support relativity seem to be inconsistent, incongruous even. We all live within out knowledge space, it's all "as far as I know". I may be too much to hope that mathematics would form a solid platform for us to test ideas, but not so. Mathematics seems to be manipulated. Ken only wanted people to read his book, and comment, that seems a reasonable request to make. Right or wrong, reading alternative theories serves to stimulate the brain. Where are all your books? It would be nice to see a book on Ballistic Ether Theory, as I mentioned, Henry has helped me analyse light ray concepts, how an angled light ray travels etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-20 11:39 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <eqrcn3FpqgfU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #422344 |
On 12/06/2017 8:18 PM, HGW... wrote: > Maybe he died. Maybe he has changed his nickname because he was so > ashamed of his theory. > > He started taking his meds, and realised that his theory was nonsense. He also realised that yours is and, given his medical history, decided that it was unsafe for him to continue to be exposed to you, and left the group accordingly. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lipek Mniak <iluka@sskwpiw.pp> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-21 11:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oidm56$1osk$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #423055 |
Sylvia Else wrote: > On 12/06/2017 8:18 PM, HGW... wrote: >> Maybe he died. Maybe he has changed his nickname because he was so >> ashamed of his theory. > > He started taking his meds, and realised that his theory was nonsense. Yes, without meds his theory makes perfectly sense. Just you terribly incapable to read.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-21 23:10 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <eqv9hhFmmh8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #423171 |
On 21/06/2017 9:43 PM, Lipek Mniak wrote: > Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 12/06/2017 8:18 PM, HGW... wrote: >>> Maybe he died. Maybe he has changed his nickname because he was so >>> ashamed of his theory. >> >> He started taking his meds, and realised that his theory was nonsense. > > Yes, without meds his theory makes perfectly sense. Just you terribly > incapable to read. > His theory was not even internally consistent, a fact that was drawn to his attention repeatedly. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-21 06:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c7121de3-a000-49d3-90ce-e2111ffb9cd3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423180 |
On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 9:10:12 AM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 21/06/2017 9:43 PM, Lipek Mniak wrote: > > Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >> On 12/06/2017 8:18 PM, HGW... wrote: > >>> Maybe he died. Maybe he has changed his nickname because he was so > >>> ashamed of his theory. > >> > >> He started taking his meds, and realised that his theory was nonsense. > > > > Yes, without meds his theory makes perfectly sense. Just you terribly > > incapable to read. > > > His theory was not even internally consistent, a fact that was drawn to > his attention repeatedly. Liar, Liar....panty on fire......Model Mechanics is fully internal consistent.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-21 11:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oie5j0$k21$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #423183 |
On 6/21/17 8:28 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 9:10:12 AM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 21/06/2017 9:43 PM, Lipek Mniak wrote: >>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/06/2017 8:18 PM, HGW... wrote: >>>>> Maybe he died. Maybe he has changed his nickname because he was so >>>>> ashamed of his theory. >>>> >>>> He started taking his meds, and realised that his theory was nonsense. >>> >>> Yes, without meds his theory makes perfectly sense. Just you terribly >>> incapable to read. >>> >> His theory was not even internally consistent, a fact that was drawn to >> his attention repeatedly. > > Liar, Liar....panty on fire...... Did you really just say that? Are you in the 3rd grade? > Model Mechanics is fully internal consistent. > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-22 07:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bbefec2a-6407-432a-9ac3-7bf7163df6de@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423186 |
On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 12:06:59 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 6/21/17 8:28 AM, kenseto wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 9:10:12 AM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 21/06/2017 9:43 PM, Lipek Mniak wrote: > >>> Sylvia Else wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 12/06/2017 8:18 PM, HGW... wrote: > >>>>> Maybe he died. Maybe he has changed his nickname because he was so > >>>>> ashamed of his theory.> >>>> > >>>> He started taking his meds, and realised that his theory was nonsense. > >>> > >>> Yes, without meds his theory makes perfectly sense. Just you terribly > >>> incapable to read. > >>> > >> His theory was not even internally consistent, a fact that was drawn to > >> his attention repeatedly. > > > > Liar, Liar....panty on fire...... > > Did you really just say that? Are you in the 3rd grade? She lied, so I tried to have some fun with her. > > > Model Mechanics is fully internal consistent. > > > > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-24 11:11 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <er5shnF698dU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #423261 |
On 23/06/2017 12:50 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 12:06:59 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 6/21/17 8:28 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 9:10:12 AM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 21/06/2017 9:43 PM, Lipek Mniak wrote: >>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 12/06/2017 8:18 PM, HGW... wrote: >>>>>>> Maybe he died. Maybe he has changed his nickname because he was so >>>>>>> ashamed of his theory.> >>>> >>>>>> He started taking his meds, and realised that his theory was nonsense. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, without meds his theory makes perfectly sense. Just you terribly >>>>> incapable to read. >>>>> >>>> His theory was not even internally consistent, a fact that was drawn to >>>> his attention repeatedly. >>> >>> Liar, Liar....panty on fire...... >> >> Did you really just say that? Are you in the 3rd grade? > > She lied, so I tried to have some fun with her. > Doesn't appear to have worked. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kenseto <setoken@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-06-23 21:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <962d5828-3e7c-4f4b-895e-4586209867d8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423346 |
On Friday, June 23, 2017 at 9:11:21 PM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 23/06/2017 12:50 AM, kenseto wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 12:06:59 PM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> On 6/21/17 8:28 AM, kenseto wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 9:10:12 AM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>> On 21/06/2017 9:43 PM, Lipek Mniak wrote: > >>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 12/06/2017 8:18 PM, HGW... wrote: > >>>>>>> Maybe he died. Maybe he has changed his nickname because he was so > >>>>>>> ashamed of his theory.> >>>> > >>>>>> He started taking his meds, and realised that his theory was nonsense. > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, without meds his theory makes perfectly sense. Just you terribly > >>>>> incapable to read. > >>>>> > >>>> His theory was not even internally consistent, a fact that was drawn to > >>>> his attention repeatedly. > >>> > >>> Liar, Liar....panty on fire...... > >> > >> Did you really just say that? Are you in the 3rd grade? > > > > She lied, so I tried to have some fun with her. > > > > Doesn't appear to have worked. > > Sylvia. Worked for me. Didn’t your panty catch on fire?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web